Rehabilitation Evidence

The Rehabilitation Evidence section of the website summarizes and critically reviews existing scientific literature on a broad range of topics in SCI rehabilitation. Acquiring and interpreting the evidence from the research literature can be daunting.  Not only is there a wealth of ever changing information from multiple sources, but it is often difficult for those not intimately familiar with the research methods to interpret the results of a study.  In addition, interpretations may be further complicated by the presence of multiple studies on an intervention, often with what appears to be conflicting messages.

SCIRE provides up-to-date, accurate information about the effect of rehabilitation health-care for people with SCI. Through a systematic and transparent procedure to synthesize the rehabilitation evidence (click here to see the methods of SCIRE), SCIRE makes available a wealth of accurate, un-biased information in areas relevant to SCI rehabilitation.

Aging

Introduction

Numerous studies have found the life expectancy after spinal cord injury (SCI) has increased steadily in the past few decades, and is now comparable to that of the able-bodied population (Geisler et al. 1983; Whiteneck et al. 1992; Hartkopp et al. 1997; McColl et al. 1997; Frankel et al. 1998; DeVivo et al. 1999; Yeo et al. 2000; Krause et al. 2004).  Due to advances in emergency, acute, and rehabilitation treatments, persons are now living many decades post-injury.   Although still relatively small, there are increasing numbers of persons who have long-term SCI and who are over the age of 55 years of age (Adkins 2001), which has allowed for some appreciation and perspective on the types of changes that occur for an individual with SCI over time.  

By definition, aging is a multi-dimensional process of physical, psychological, and social change, and gaining an understanding of aging is extremely complex (Aldwin and Gilmer 2004).  Even in the general population, the study of aging is still a relatively new area that has experienced an upsurge in research, but is in the process of gaining consensus on many theoretical and methodological issues (Aldwin and Gilmer 2004).  Initially, SCI was considered a relatively static condition, and that persons with SCI would be able to maintain their functional level for most of their lives (Trieschmann 1987).  However, we now understand that the superimposition of impairment, such as SCI, further complicates the assessment of aging effects (Adkins 2004). 

McColl and colleagues (2002) list five changes that persons with SCI undergo as they age: 1) the effects of living with SCI long-term (e.g., shoulder pain, chronic bladder infections); 2) secondary health conditions of the original lesion (e.g., post-traumatic syringomyelia); 3) pathological processes unrelated to the SCI (e.g., cardiovascular disease); 4) degenerative changes associated with aging (e.g., joint problems); and 5) environmental factors (e.g., societal, cultural) that may potentially complicate the experience of aging with a SCI.  All of these factors have the potential to compromise a person with SCI’s ability to sustain independence and ability to participate in their communities at later stages in life.  

Chronological Age, Years Post-Injury, and Age at Injury

A problem with aging research after SCI is that the relationship between age at injury, current chronological age, and years post-injury (YPI) are all linearly dependent, which limits the ability to assess the influence of all three factors at the same time statistically (Adkins 2001). Hence, investigators are limited to examine only three possible combinations of factors, which include: 1) current age and YPI; 2) current age and age at injury; and 3) age at injury and YPI.  Despite this issue, the field continues to strive to attribute changes in health and well-being to these aging variables.  Thompson and Yakura (2001) comment that “developing an understanding of the effect of advancing age versus longer durations of injury on the incidence and type of changes can help in the prediction of when people with SCI might be susceptible to changes in function” (p. 73).  Doing so may lead to better health promotion strategies to avoid declines in health and well-being since even slight changes in functioning after SCI can adversely affect a person’s level of independence.

SCI: A Model of Premature Aging?

A growing body of evidence in the literature is suggesting that SCI represents a model for premature aging (Bauman and Spungen, 1994).  The premature aging of certain body systems may occur because of additional stresses that extend some physical systems beyond their ability to repair themselves, which then become systematic (Charlifue and Lammertse 2002).  Although the aging process occurs at varying rates and at different ages for each individual (Charlifue 1993), it is generally accepted that our bodily functions reach a maximum capacity prior to or during early adulthood, and then begin to experience a gradual decline.  This decline is thought to commence at approximately 25 years of age when the developmental process plateaus and biological capacity has peaked (Capoor and Stein 2005).   At this point, the reserve capacity of our organ systems begins to drop at a rate of 1% of their function per year in able-bodied persons. When the reserve capacity declines below 40% of original functioning, there is greater chance of becoming injured, and/or more susceptible to infection or disease (Kemp and Thompson 2002).  With the occurrence of an SCI, there is disruption to the system.  This disruption to physiological and functional changes potentially accelerates bodily declines for a period of time or capacity is reduced at approximately the time of injury, after which the effect of aging is said to proceed at a normal rate (Adkins 2004).

Age of injury may have important consequences on different aspects of health.  Because there are increasing numbers of seniors incurring a SCI due to falls, a bi-modal age-of-onset distribution exists, with the prevalence of SCI peaking among individuals who are 30 and 60 years of age (Pickett et al. 2006).  As a result, researchers have been able to investigate and compare age-related outcomes after SCI.  For example, there are a number of studies showing that persons who incur a SCI at later ages have poorer functional outcomes than those injured at younger ages (DeVivo et al. 1990; Alander et al. 1997; Scivoletto et al. 2004), although in some instances, the impact of SCI may be minimized in older persons. 

Within a reserve capacity model of biological aging that is disrupted by SCI, Adkins (2004) theorizes that the impact of injury “decreases the further out on the age continuum the injury occurs” (p. 5).  However, if the injury occurs far enough along the continuum, then even a minimal change in rate will lower reserve capacity below 40% soon after injury since capacity is already low.   Further, adults with older ages of SCI-onset may have other pre-existing or vulnerabilities to co-morbidities that affect outcomes compared to younger adults (Furlan et al. 2009). 

Given the increasing mean age of SCI onset, along with increased life expectancy, we may be able to clarify which changes to systems are attributed to the SCI, those which are related to chronological age and the aging process, and those which result from their interaction.  Adkins (2004), however, suggests that it may be prudent to establish age of onset exclusion criteria when studying biological aging with SCI. In addition, completeness and neurological level of SCI must also be taken into account since a person with a complete lesion may experience aging in a different manner than someone with an incomplete lesion (Charlifue 1993).

Aging and Quality of Life

In addition to issues of biological aging, the interaction of environmental and psychological factors with aging must be taken into account.  Unlike physical aging, it may be that these aspects of a person’s life may actually improve, and may be more amenable to intervention to either delay, modify or eliminate their potential negative impact (Charlifue and Lammertse 2001).  There are a multitude of individual factors that may affect, or be affected, by physiologic aging, which must be considered when evaluating how people age with SCI.  This may include economic factors, environmental barriers and facilitators, cultural issues, and social networks (intimate and remote; Charlifue and Lammertse 2001).  As a result of this complex phenomenon, there are issues that remain unclear with quality of life and aging with SCI, as some studies report contradictory findings, with life satisfaction and community integration decreasing with age, but increasing with years post-injury (YPI; i.e., Eisenberg and Saltz 1991; Krause and Crewe 1991; McColl and Rosenthal 1994; Pentland et al. 1995; Westgren and Levi 1998; Dowler et al. 2001; Tonack et al. 2008).  Hence, it is imperative that we identify which factors lead to high levels of quality of life in order to ensure that people with SCI are not only living long, but that they are also living well.

Chapter Purpose

The chapter summarizes some key issues in the SCI aging literature, and evaluates the level of

evidence provided by selected studies on aging with SCI.  The selected research for evaluation includes longitudinal studies, case-control and cross-sectional comparative studies.  As longitudinal studies inherently include at least a baseline and follow-up evaluation, these studies were graded with a level of evidence of 4 (at least equivalent to pre-post studies).  Prospective longitudinal studies that also included a control group (e.g., able-bodied group) were graded with a level of evidence of 2 as they are considered cohort studies where one group is exposed to a particular condition (in this case, a spinal cord injury).  Longitudinal studies which included historical controls (from chart review or database) were graded with a level of evidence of 3.  Cross-sectional studies (or comparative studies) utilizing both individuals with SCI and able-bodied controls at one point in time were graded with a level of evidence of 5.  Studies involving mixed populations in which < 50% of the subjects had a SCI were excluded as were articles not in English.  Longitudinal studies that only reported cross-sectional analysis were also excluded from evaluation.  The results presented from each study primarily focus on the analyses relevant to aging, and the p-values reported are those reported in the original articles.

Although the use of longitudinal designs are preferred, comparison studies with age-matched able-bodied (AB) controls is a useful approach for studying aging after SCI because it provides some awareness of the factors associated with the typical aging process (Charlifue 1993), while helping to illuminate whether changes are due to YPI rather than current age per se.  After sustaining a SCI, age and YPI increase at the same pace, and so using age-matched AB controls allows us to determine the effects that might have occurred without SCI and those that occurred with SCI (Adkins 2004). This approach may offer some insight on whether changes after SCI are unique and/or accelerated in persons with SCI or if they are typical of the aging process.

The issues related to aging are described as mortality and life expectancy (see Table 1), physiological aging, which include the cardiovascular and endocrine systems (see Table 2), immune system (see Table 3), musculoskeletal system (see Table 4), respiratory system (see Table 5), nervous system (see Table 6), skin and subcutaneous tissues (see Table 7),  and the genitourinary and gastrointestinal systems (see Table 8), and community reintegration and quality of life (see Table 9).

Hitzig SL, Miller WC, Eng JJ, Sakakibara BM (2010). Aging Following Spinal Cord Injury. In: Eng JJ, Teasell RW, Miller WC, Wolfe DL, Townson AF, Hsieh JTC, Connolly SJ, Mehta S, Sakakibara BM, editors. Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Evidence. Volume 3.0. Vancouver: p. 1-67.

Mortality and Life Expectancy

Survival rates for individuals with SCI have made steady improvements over the past five decades.  Prior to World War II, however, life expectancy for individuals with SCI was quite poor (Geisler et al. 1983).  Leading causes of death were those resulting from renal failure and infection (Lammertse 2001).  Since the introduction of antibiotics, improved emergency transportation, advances in long-term health interventions, and the availability of preventative care at specialized treatment centers, mortality rates have been steadily decreasing, and the causes of death have begun to mirror those of the general population (Whiteneck et al. 1992; DeVivo et al. 1999).  However, the life expectancy is still diminished compared to the general population (Geisler et al. 1983; Whiteneck et al. 1992; Hartkopp et al. 1997; McColl et al. 1997; Frankel et al. 1998; DeVivo et al. 1999; Yeo et al. 2000; Krause et al. 2004).

In 2002, the leading causes of death in high- and middle-income countries for the general population included coronary heart disease, stroke and other cerebrovascular diseases, cancer, and lower respiratory infections (WHO 2007).  Similarly, two leading causes of death in the SCI population are respiratory complications and heart disease (Hartkopp et al.1997; Frankel et al.1998; DeVivo et al. 1999; Soden et al. 2000; Zeilig et al. 2000; Garshick et al. 2005; NSCISC 2006).  The latest report from the National Spinal Cord Injury Database (NSCIDB), which has yielded information on the aging SCI population in the United States, indicates the main causes of death are pneumonia, pulmonary emboli, and septicemia (NSCISC 2008).  The cases of septicemia were typically associated with decubitus ulcers, urinary tract or respiratory infections (NSCIS 2006).  The high rates of cardiovascular disease in the SCI population may be partly due to physiological and functional changes following injury (Bauman et al. 1992a; Dearwater et al. 1986; Gupta 2006; Yekutiel et al. 1989; Bauman et al. 1992b).  Interestingly, cancer is a growing cause of death in persons with SCI (DeVivo et al. 1999; Zeilig et al. 2000; Imai et al. 2004; NSCISC 2006). It is unclear if there is an increased risk for all types of cancer, but there is some evidence that individuals with SCI may be at an increased risk for the development of bladder cancer (El-Masri and Fellows 1981; Stonehill et al.1996; West et al. 1999). In general, it appears that as individuals with SCI age, the causes of death become more closely associated with the typical age-related causes of death rather than those associated with the SCI itself (Capoor and Stein 2005).  However, some causes may be occurring prematurely (e.g., cardiovascular disease; Yekutiel et al. 1995), and there are some notable differences in mortality patterns between the SCI and the general populations.

A report from the NSCIDB on data between 1993 and 1998 indicated that external causes (i.e., unintentional injuries, homicide, suicide, etc.) were the third leading causes of death. In particular, suicide was the second leading cause of death in persons younger than 30 years of age, and in persons with paraplegia (DeVivo et al. 1999). These findings were consistent with other studies examining suicide as a cause of death after SCI (e.g., Charlifue and Gerhart 1991; DeVivo and Stover 1995; Hartkopp et al. 1997). The prevalence of these types of death highlight the need to focus energies on improving both treatment procedures and preventative measures since causes of death such as coronary heart disease might be prevented or minimized by promoting healthy lifestyle habits. Similarly, clinical interventions geared at improving coping skills after SCI may help to minimize the risk of suicide (Hartkopp et al. 1997; Imai et al. 2004; Krause et al. 2004).  Overall, important prognostic factors influencing length of survival include age and impairment, which includes neurological level, degree of injury completeness, and ventilator dependency (Kraus et al. 1979; Kiwerski et al. 1981; Le and Price 1982; Sneddon and Bedbrook 1982; Geisler et al. 1983; Whiteneck et al. 1992; Daverat et al. 1989; DeVivo et al. 1992; Alander et al. 1994; DeVivo and Ivie, 1995; DeVivo et al. 1999; Alander et al. 1997; McColl et al. 1997; Coll 1998; Frankel et al. 1998;Yeo et al. 1998; DeVivo et al. 1999; Strauss et al. 2000; Strauss et al. 2006).

In this section, the evidence reviewed (see Table 1) is consistent with the general findings on mortality and life expectancy in the SCI literature.

Table 1:  Mortality and Life-Expectancy

Discussion

In summary, causes of death in persons with SCI appear to be similar to those of the able-bodied population, but mortality may be occurring earlier due to higher rates of disease possibly attributed to metabolic changes. Samsa et al. (1993) found that the life expectancy of male veterans with traumatic SCI who survived at least 3 months (N = 5545) was significantly lower (p < .01) than those of a non-disabled veteran control group (N = 6967).  The mean life expectancy of the SCI group was 39 years after injury, 85% that of similarly aged American males. Hence, life expectancy in persons with SCI is lower than the general population. These findings are consistent with studies not meeting the chapter inclusion criteria examining life-expectancy post- SCI (i.e. Whiteneck et al. 1992; Hartkopp et al. 1997; McColl et al. 1997; Yeo et al. 2000; Imai et al. 2004).

Although Samsa et al. (1993) found that neurologic impairment was not a significant predictor for mortality, they noted a moderate effect (p < .06) for persons with cervical injuries that were complete.   A few studies have shown a lack of association between impairment and mortality (e.g., Liang et al. 2001; Imai et al. 2004; Garshick et al. 2005), whereas several studies have highlighted the importance of impairment as a prognostic factor (Whiteneck et al. 1992; McColl et al. 1997; Coll et al. 1998; DeVivo et al. 1998; Soden et al. 2000; Yeo et al. 2000; Strauss et al. 2006).  Consistent with previous findings of studies not meeting the chapter inclusion criteria (i.e., Whiteneck et al. 1992; Frankel et al. 1998), Samsa and colleagues (1993) found age of onset to be a significant predictor of long-term survival.

With regards to causes of mortality, Samsa et al. (1993) found that diseases of the genitourinary system (i.e., renal failure, septicemia) disproportionately accounted for death in their SCI sample and the patterns of death began to approach that of the general population by 20 years post-injury.  For instance, the rates of circulatory disease and neoplasms steadily increased across time points.  Interestingly, the causes of death due to injury and poisoning, and external conditions were the highest at 3-months to 5 years post-SCI, and steadily decreased across time points.  Although not discussed, their findings on these causes of death may have included suicides.  Regardless, the findings of lower levels of evidence highlighting the high rates of suicide as a cause of death (i.e., Imai et al. 2004) reinforces the need to provide psycho-social services to help minimize the occurrence of suicide in persons with SCI.  An acknowledged limitation of the study by Samsa et al. (1993) is the reliance on secondary data sources for case identification, control selection, and mortality assessment.  The study was also only on male veterans that did not include women or persons who did not survive acute SCI (i.e., less than 3 months post-SCI).

Conclusion

  • There is Level 5 evidence from an observational study (Samsa et al. 1993) that life expectancy for males with SCI is lower than the general male population.
  • There is Level 5 evidence from an observational study (Samsa et al. 1993) that persons who were injured at a younger age (SCI onset approximately < 30 years) will have a longer life expectancy than persons injured at an older age (SCI onset approximately > 30 years).
  • There is Level 5 evidence from an observational study (Samsa et al. 1993) that causes of death post-SCI are beginning to approximate those of the general population.
  • Life-expectancy for males with SCI is likely lower than the general male population.
  • Persons injured at a younger age will likely have a longer life expectancy than persons injured at an older age.
  • Causes of death post-SCI may be beginning to approximate those of the general population.

Physiological Aging

Even at the biological level, aging is a highly complex phenomenon that can be examined at the genetic, cellular, organ-system, and even the psycho-social level(Aldwin and Gilmer 2004).  To address physiological aging after SCI, the identified studies were separated into different body systems, which include the cardiovascular and endocrine systems (see Table 2), immune system (see Table 3), musculoskeletal system (see Table 4), respiratory system (see Table 5), nervous system (see Table 6), skin and subcutaneous tissues (see Table 7), and the genitourinary and gastrointestinal systems (see Table 8).

  • SCI may represent a model for premature aging. There is strong evidence that the endocrine and musculoskeletal systems are prematurely aging, while there is limited evidence for the respiratory, skin and subcutaneous tissues, genitourinary, and gastrointestinal systems. There is weak and limited evidence that the immune and nervous system are prematurely aging.

Cardiovascular and Endocrine Systems

Similar to the general population, cardiovascular disease has become one of the leading causes of death in the SCI population (DeVivo et al. 1989; DeVivo et al. 1993; Frankel et al. 1998).  There are multiple risk factors for its premature development due to physiological and functional changes following SCI (Bauman et al. 1994; Bauman and Spungen 2001a; Bauman and Spungen, 2001b).  For instance, many age-associated disorders such as carbohydrate intolerance, insulin resistance (Duckworth et al. 1980; Duckworth et al. 1983; Bauman et al. 1992; Karlsson et al. 1991) and lipid abnormalities (LaPorte et al. 1983; Brenes et al. 1986; Bauman et al. 1992; Bauman and Spungen 2001) are known to occur prematurely in persons with SCI.   Some have hypothesized that a marked decreased in physical activity (Myers et al. 2007), along with injury-related changes in metabolic function, lead to an increased risk and premature development of cardiovascular disease (Bravo et al. 2004) and diabetes mellitus (Bauman 1993). 

Related to the metabolic changes noted above, there is a high prevalence of muscle weakness in persons with SCI attributed to a loss of lean body mass (Thompson and Yakura 2006), that is possibly linked to reduced activity, and abnormally low levels of endogenous anabolic hormones (i.e., human growth hormone and testosterone; Bauman et al. 1994).  In the general population, age-related declines in the endocrine systems also lead to decreases in lean muscle mass and an increase in fat (Tenover 1999).  However, these declines have been shown to be greater in persons with SCI (Bauman and Spungen 2001b).  Similarly, the noted changes in insulin resistance are thought to account for the high rates of diabetes mellitus in persons with SCI (Yekutiel et al. 1989)  This in turn leads to an increased risk for cardiovascular disease since the development of diabetes impairs the circulatory system (Halter 1999).  As such, it may be that alterations in body composition, which occur early following SCI, contribute to premature development of these disorders as compared to the AB population (Bauman et al. 1994). 

Table 2: Cardiovascular and Endocrine Systems

Discussion

Cardiovascular System

In this section, the evidence reviewedappears to support the notion that the cardiovascular system is prematurely aging.  With regard to risk factors for cardiovascular disease, Bauman and colleagues (2001) found that regardless of age or sex, persons with SCI had significantly higher levels of plasma homocysteine than able bodied (AB) controls, and that older persons with SCI (>50 years) had higher levels than younger persons with SCI.  Plasma homocysteine is thought to promote coagulation and to decrease the resistance of the endothelium to thrombosis (Malinow, 1994), and is a clear independent mark for the prediction of vascular disease (Clarke et al. 1991; Stampfer et al. 1992).  The findings regarding lipid profiles also support an increased risk for the development of cardiovascular disease.  Several studies (Demirel et al. 1991; Zlotolow et al. 1992; Bauman and Spungen, 1994; Bauman et al. 1995; Bauman et al. 1999; Liang et al. 2007; Wang et al. 2007) found that serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c) are depressed in persons with SCI compared to AB controls, which is associated with an increased risk for developing coronary heart disease (Goldbour and Medalie 1979; Castelli 1984). 

An important factor influencing these variables is lifestyle, which includes a sedentary lifestyle that is more common in persons with SCI (Maki et al. 1995).  However, one longitudinal study (Apstein and George 1998) provides evidence that these changes can not be fully explained by diet or physical activity alone, at least at the acute phase of SCI.  Apstein and George (1998) found that total cholesterol (TC), total glycerides (TG), and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) increased while LDL/HDL ratios decreased for males with tetraplegia (n = 65) and paraplegia (n = 35) from the acute phase until 1 YPI.  As well, all lipid profiles were found to be significantly depressed compared to AB controls (n = 80), and persons with tetraplegia had low HDL and elevated LDL/HDL ratios. 

Another risk factor for vascular disease in both symptomatic (Budoff 2005) and asymptomatic (Raggi 2000) populations is coronary artery calcification (CAC), which is a component of artherosclerotic plaque.  Orakzai and colleagues (2007) found higher (p < .05) levels of CAC in persons with SCI (N = 82) compared to AB controls (N = 273), and that this risk is higher for males, and for persons with tetraplegia.

Sustaining a SCI also affects blood pressure by altering the sympathetic activity to blood vessels.  There is evidence that men with tetraplegia (Yamamoto et al. 1999) and paraplegia (Petrofsky and Laymon 2002) have increased blood pressure responses during exercise compared to AB controls.  As well, Petrofsky and Laymon (2002) found that their group with paraplegia had a larger change in blood pressure both at rest and during exercise and was more associated with aging than for the controls.  Disturbingly, static exercise has been found to cause tachycardia in AB controls, but not in persons with SCI (Petrofsky and Laymon 2002; Orakzai et al. 2007) when paralyzed muscles were engaged.  Despite these adverse changes in the cardiovascular system, one study with a longitudinal component (Leaf et al. 1993) found that cardiac dysrhythmias occurring in acute SCI do not contribute to their occurrence in the chronic stage.  Overall, these findings are indicative of altered autonomic control, but not of aging per se.  Further work is needed to determine the long-term implications for cardiovascular health.

Decreases in physical activity may contribute to the development of cardiovascular disease, which may be reflected in body composition changes following SCI.  Assessing body composition, however, should not solely rely on body mass index (BMI).   One study (Spungen et al. 2000) found greater BMI levels in persons with SCI compared to AB controls, whereas others found the opposite (Bauman et al. 1999; Bauman et al. 2004) or no differences at all (Zlotolow et al. 1992; Bauman and Spungen 1994; Bauman et al. 1994; Tsitouras et al. 1995; Bauman et al. 1996; Liang et al. 2007).  Given these contradictory findings, BMI may not be an appropriate measure for SCI since studies (Bauman et al. 1996; Bauman et al. 1999; Spungen et al. 2000; Bauman et al. 2004; Jones et al. 2004)that also examined lean and fat mass tissue found that persons with SCI had significantly higher levels of fat mass tissue and lower levels of lean tissue than AB controls.  These differences in lean and fat mass tissue appear to be attributable to YPI, and not age.  For instance, Spungen et al. (2000) found lower lean mass and higher fat mass in persons with SCI who were matched with their AB monozygotic twin, which was directly related to YPI.  As well, Bauman and colleagues (2004) concluded from their monozygotic SCI twin study that reductions in lean muscle tissue lead to reduced energy expenditure, which appear to be related, albeit not significantly, to YPI.  These findings are congruent with SCI-only cross-sectional studies examining body composition (Cardus and McTaggart 1985; Shizgal et al. 1986; Rossier et al. 1991).

Endocrine System

Metabolic changes after SCI may also be associated with changes in body composition, and may increase the risk of developing diabetes mellitus.  Tsitouras and colleagues (1995) posited that impaired hGH secretion may be partially responsible for SCI- and aging-associated lean body and muscle mass depletion.  Several identified studies (Shetty et al. 1993; Bauman et al. 1994; Tsitouras et al. 1995) provide evidence that serum IGF-I levels are lower in persons with SCI compared to age-matched controls, and that this depletion is associated with impaired hGH.  Bauman et al. (1994) found that the average IGF-I was significantly lower (p < .05) in younger individuals with SCI than that in younger AB controls, but not in those greater than 45 years of age.  As such, this pattern of IGF-I levels in younger males with SCI appears to be similar to those of elderly AB individuals (Bauman et al. 1994). 

Related to this, Bauman and Spungen (1994) found that persons with SCI (N = 100) had an abnormality in carbohydrate tolerance, with the SCI group having higher mean glucose and insulin levels (P < .05), and lower mean fasting plasma glucose levels than the AB control group (N = 50).  This intolerance was found to be present in two-thirds of their group with tetraplegia, and in half their group with paraplegia.  Further, 22% of the persons with SCI met the diagnostic criteria for having diabetes mellitus, whereas only 6% of the AB controls were found to be diabtetic.  Since these adverse clinical features occurred at younger ages in their SCI sample, Bauman and Spungen (1994) interpreted their findings as being a model of premature aging.  The findings of Jones and colleagues (2004), and LaVela and colleagues (2006) appear to confirm this hypothesis as they both found higher rates of metabolic syndrome and diabetes in their SCI samples compared to the AB population.  Conversely, Liang et al. (2007) found that males with SCI (N = 185) were not a higher risk for metabolic syndrome compared to AB controls (N = 185).  This discrepancy may be due to some of the study’s limitations (i.e., reliance on self-report height and weight to calculate BMI), and because they used a standard, rather than a modified, criteria for the syndrome which is not appropriate for persons with SCI. 

The predisposition to carbohydrate and lipid abnormalities is thought to be largely a consequence of extreme inactivity, and the constellation of metabolic findings (i.e., hormone growth hormone deficiency, testosterone deficiency) appears to be occurring prematurely in persons with SCI (Bauman and Spungen 1994).  As well, studies (Wang et al. 1992; Huang et al. 1993; Cheville et al. 1995) showing evidence of thyroid impairment after SCI compared to the AB population.  All of these findings suggest that persons with SCI may be frequently physiologically comprised, and more susceptible to minor pathologic insults.  Along with associated changes in body composition, an increased risk for the development of cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, and infection is higher following SCI (Bauman and Spungen 2001b).

Conclusion>

  • There is Level 5 evidence from a cross-sectional study (Bauman and Spungen 2001) that plasma homocysteine levels are higher in persons with SCI compared to the AB population, with the greatest discrepancy in older adults with SCI (> 50 years).
  • There is Level 5 evidence from seven cross-sectional studies (Zlotolow et al. 1992; Huang et al. 1993; Bauman and Spungen 1994; Bauman et al. 1996; Huang et al. 1998; Bauman et al. 1999; Demirel et al. 2001; Liang et al. 2007; Wang et al. 2007) that abnormal lipid profiles after SCI may contribute to the development of cardiovascular disease.
  • There is Level 4 evidence (Apstein and George 1998) that total cholesterol (TC), total glycerides (TG), and low-density lipoproteins (LDL) increased while LDL/high-density lipoproteins (HDL) ratios decreased for males with tetraplegia and paraplegia from the acute phase until 1 YPI. All lipid profiles were significantly depressed compared to controls.
  • There is Level 4 evidence (Apstein and George 1998) that persons with tetraplegia had low HDL and elevated LDL/HDL ratios, which places them at an increased risk for coronary artery disease.
  • There is Level 5 evidence (Wang et al. 2007) that C-reactive protein levels are higher in males with SCI, which could also account for the decreases in TC, LDL, and HDL. Elevated C-reactive protein levels may also partly explain why persons with SCI are at increased risk for accelerated atherogenesis.
  • There is Level 5 evidence (Orakzai et al. 2007) that persons with SCI have greater atherosclerotic burden compared to an AB reference population.
  • There is Level 5 evidence from two studies that men with complete paraplegia have an abnormal (absent) heart rate response (Petrofsky and Laymon 2002)
  • There is Level 5 evidence that men with complete tetraplegia demonstrate increased blood pressure (Yamamoto et al. 1999).
  • There is Level 5 evidence (Tsitouras et al. 1995; Wang et al. 1992; Cheville et al. 1995; Shetty et al. 1999) that there is SCI related lower secretion of testosterone and human growth hormone levels in persons with SCI compared to AB controls.
  • There is Level 5 evidence from two studies (Tsitouras et al. 1995; Bauman et al. 1994) that serum IGF-I levels are impaired in persons with SCI compared to the AB population, and may be a sign of premature aging.
  • There is Level 5 evidence from three studies (Bauman and Spungen 1994; Jones et al. 2004; Liang et al. 2007) that glucose intolerance is lower after SCI, which may lead to an increased risk for premature diabetes mellitus.
  • There is Level 5 evidence (LaVela et al. 2006) that diabetes mellitus occurs prematurely in male veterans with SCI compared to AB veteran controls.
  • Six studies (Nuhlicek et al. 1988; Bauman et al. 1996; Bauman et al. 1999; Spungen et al. 2000; Jones et al. 2003; Jones et al. 2004) provide Level 5 evidence that persons with SCI are likely to have higher levels of fat mass, and that age-related declines of lean tissue in males with SCI may occur at a significantly faster rate than the AB population.
  • There is Level 5 evidence from one monozygotic twin study (Bauman et al. 2004) that basal and resting energy expenditures are lower in males with SCI compared to their AB twin.
  • Greater levels of arthersclerotic burden, higher levels of C-reactive protein levels and abnormal lipid profiles compared to the able-bodied population increases the risk for the development of cardiovascular disease in persons with SCI.
  • Men with complete SCI have abnormal heart rate and blood pressure responses compared to able-bodied controls, which are indicative of altered autonomic control, but not from advancing aging per se.
  • Impaired secretion of both testosterone and human growth hormone may be due to SCI, and not from advancing age per se.
  • Serum IGF-I levels may be impaired compared to the able-bodied population, which may be a sign of premature aging.
  • Glucose intolerance may be impaired in persons with SCI, which may lead to an increased risk for premature diabetes mellitus.
  • Persons with SCI are at higher risk for the development of cardiovascular disease and diabetes mellitus than the able-bodied population.
  • Persons with SCI may have higher levels of fat mass than the able-bodied population.
  • Age-related declines of lean tissue in males with SCI may occur at a significantly faster rate than the able-bodied population.
  • Age of onset may not influence hematologic abnormalities at the acute phase post-SCI (within first week post-injury).

Immune System

Although the immune system is affected by a number of factors, including nutritional status, stress, exercise, neuroendcorine change, and disease, there is consensus that immune functioning undergoes some age-related declines (Miller 1996; Burns and Leventhal 2000; Rabin 2000).  There is limited evidence on the effects of SCI on the immune system with aging, although several studies (i.e., Lyons 1987; Nash 1994; Kliesch et al. 1996; Campagnolo et al. 1999; Cruse et al. 2000) suggest deficits in immune functioning.  Hence, there is greater likelihood of immune impairment in the aging SCI population compared to the non-disabled population (Charlifue and Lammertse 2002).

Table 3: Immune System

Discussion

Only a few studies on the immune system met the inclusion criteria (See Table 3).  Furlan and colleagues (2006) found that hemoglobin concentration, blood leukocyte count, and blood platelet are reduced following acute SCI (N = 21) compared to AB controls (N = 11), but that the age of the person does not play a factor in this reduction.  Persons with chronic SCI who have complete injuries (N = 5) demonstrate altered immune function compared to AB controls (Campagnolo et al. 1994).  As well, a study (Campagnolo et al. 1999) comparing persons with SCI (N = 18) compared to AB controls (N = 18) suggests that persons with SCI have higher levels of cortisol (p = .06) and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DS; p = .05), but comparable levels of dehydroepiandrosterone, adrenocorticotropin, and prolactin.  As well, they found that DS (p = .05) and dehydroepiandrosterone (p = .07) were higher in persons with tetraplegia compared to controls, but no differences between persons with paraplegia and controls. Campagnolo et al. (1999) concluded that immune functioning is altered after SCI, but may be mediated by level of injury.  Meaning, persons with tetraplegia may have a greater degree of alteration to the immune system compared to persons with paraplegia.  Unfortunately, the sample sizes of the identified studies were quite small, and none were longitudinal. 

Further research related to the immune system need to be investigated since older age of SCI-onset leads to poorer outcomes (Prusmack et al. 2006) and SCI of long duration results in increased infection (Whiteneck et al. 1992).  Given that persons with SCI are inundated with antiobiotics throughout their lives, there are a number of important questions regarding the long-term effects on the immune system (Adkins 2004).

Conclusion

  • There is Level 5 evidence (Campagnolo et al. 1994; Campagnolo et al. 1996; Furlan et al. 2006) that the immune function of persons with acute and chronic SCI is compromised compared to the AB population, but there is no influence due to aging.
  • Immune function after SCI at both the acute and chronic phase is compromised compared to able-bodied controls, but age may not play an important role.

Musculoskeletal System

The musculoskeletal (MSK) system provides the most obvious external signs of aging, and is especially impacted by aging as most people have some wear and tear in this area as they age (Aldwin and Gilmer 2004).  Declines in the MSK system after long-term SCI often include upper extremity pain (Waters et al. 1993), reduced strength due to muscle atrophy (Giangregorio and McCartney 2006), and an increased risk for fractures (Lazo et al. 2001).  Hence, the complications associated with a degenerating MSK system hold serious implications in terms of functionality for the person aging with SCI.

 In terms of bone health, peak bone mass is achieved by the age of 30 in the general population and then declines, but the rate of decline is impacted by a number of factors such as age, gender, and lifestyle (e.g., smoking).  Although the risk for osteoporosis and fracture are greater among post-menopausal women over the age of 65 in the general community (Goddard and Kleerekoper1998), there is evidence for increased risk in the SCI population (Ingram et al. 1989; Garland et al. 1992; Lazo et al. 2001).  After sustaining a SCI, there are several reports of bone loss occurring in the early months following injury (Garland et al. 1992).  These losses are regional; areas rich in trabecular bone are demineralized to the greatest degree, with the distal femur and proximal tibia bones being the most affected, followed by the pelvis and arms (Garland et al. 2001a).  However, there is some evidence that there is a continual loss of bone mass with time since injury (Demirel et al. 1998; Bauman et al. 1999), which suggests that a steady-state of lower extremity bone mineral homeostasis is not reached (Ashe et al. 2006).  Assuming that the rate of bone loss in the aging SCI-population is similar to that of the non-disabled population, it is likely that the degree of osteoporosis will be much more severe since they will have less skeletal mass at the onset of typical age-related declines in bone mass (Waters et al. 1993). 

As a result of bone loss associated with SCI, there is an increased risk for fracture (Garland et al. 2001a; Ashe et al. 2006).  In the general population, fracture of the hip is one of the few skeletal disorders associated with significant mortality (Aldwin and Gilmer 2004).  Approximately 20% of older persons who sustain a hip fracture die with in a year, which are thought due to secondary causes or the person was debilitated (Pottenger 1997; Cooney 1999).  After SCI, the most common areas at risk for fracture include the distal femur and proximal tibia, and are consistent with site-specific decreases in bone mineral density around the knee (Ashe et al. 2006).  The majority of fragility fractures occur following transfers or activities that involve minimal or no trauma (Ragnarsson and Sell 1981).  With regards to age, there are studies of lower evidence levels (i.e., Lazo et al. 2001) that individuals with SCI with osteoporosis are older, and who have longer durations of SCI than those who have normal BMD.  However, it is BMD, and not age per se, that is the significant predictor for risk of fracture (Lazo et al. 2001).  Interestingly, the BMD of the spine is often maintained or actually increases (Garland et al. 2001a; Sabo et al. 2001). 

Although BMD of the spine after SCI does not appear to be affected by aging, other age-related changes to the spine do occur. As one ages, the spine undergoes degeneration, which may lead to symptoms of pain radiating into the extremities, deformity, or loss of sensation and/or motor function due to nerve root compression (Waters et al. 1993).  Age-related degenerative changes in the spine could severely impact individuals with SCI whose functional capacities are already limited (Waters et al. 1993).  Long-term SCI is associated with scoliosis and/or Charcot spine (Sobel et al. 1985; Park et al. 1994; Krause 2000; Vogel et al. 2002; Abel et al. 2003).  Age at injury, however, may also play a role as there is some lower level evidence that the odds of developing curvature of the spine is lower in persons who were older when injured (Krause 2000).

In the general population, there is degeneration in the joints of the upper and lower extremities, and common sites include the shoulder, knee, and hip (Waters et al. 1993).  As well, muscle atrophy is inevitable with age, although the rate of decline varies from person to person (Loeser and Delbono 1999).  These age-related changes may lead to joint pain, stiffness, restricted range of motion, or trauma (i.e., fracture) that would not typically occur in a younger person. As a result, independence when performing daily activities may be compromised due to restricted activities of daily living, mobility, and even the ability to maintain body temperature (Aldwin and Gilmer 2004).

In addition to bone loss (see section 2.2.1), persons with SCI experience muscle atrophy Giangregorio and McCartney 2006), especially those denervated from complete SCI (Lam et al. 2006).  In the lower extremities, muscle degeneration typically occurs at the knee in persons who are capable of ambulation but have persisting gait abnormalities, which in turn generate pathologic forces at the knee (Waters et al. 1993). Although persons who primarily utilize wheelchairs rarely develop clinically significant degenerative problems in the lower extremities, they are more likely to have problems in the upper extremities due to increased reliance on the upper extremities to push their wheelchairs, to transfer, and perform weight-shift maneuvers to prevent pressure ulcers (Waters et al. 1993).

Upper extremity pain is common in persons with long-term SCI, and most frequently affects the shoulder and wrist (Sie et al. 1992; Thompson and Yakura 2001; Waters and Sie 2001), and typically increases with duration of injury (Sie et al. 1992; Ballinger et al. 2000; Waters and Sie, 2001). The prevalence of shoulder pain in SCI individuals ranges between 30-100% (Curtis et al. 1999) and is a consequence of increased physical demands and overuse (Nichols et al. 1979; Pentland and Twomey 1991). It is unclear, however, if these findings are independent of treatment era effects or are affected by environmental changes in mobility technology, accessibility, and rehabilitation practices (Adkins 2004). 

Losses in strength and diminished joint capacity along with joint degeneration due to overuse can negatively impact functional ability, which makes maintaining high levels of independence difficult. Since persons with SCI are operating at a near-maximum capacity but have a low reserve capacity, these declines in functionality may occur prematurely (Thompson and Yakura 2001).

Table 4: Musculoskeletal System

Discussion

In general, the evidence (see Table 4) supports the notion that the musculoskeletal system undergoes obvious external signs of premature aging except for a few areas.  Several studies find that there is rapid bone loss, and particularly so for the pelvis and lower limbs within the acute stage post-SCI (Garland et al. 1992; Biering-Sorenson et al. 1990; Wilmet et al. 1995; Dauty et al. 2000; de Bruin et al. 2000; Frey-Rindova et al. 2000; Garland et al. 2004; Frotzler et al. 2008).  Further, this loss may be greater for older persons (Chow et al. 1996), and females with SCI (Garland et al. 2001b)and is evident in both bone mineral density (BMD; amount of matter per cubic centimeter of bones) and content (BMC; bone mass).  Similarly, there are bone geometric changes (Finsen et al. 1992; de Bruin et al. 2000; Giangregorio et al. 2005) that occur, which may be independent of chronological age and YPI (Slade et al. 2005).  Some of the findings are mixed with regards to the duration of decline, with some suggesting that bone mass continues to decline throughout the chronic phase (Finsen et al. 1992), with others reporting a rapid loss with stabilization after approximately 2 years (Biering-Sorenson et al. 1990; Garland et al. 1992).  However, a cross-sectional study with AB controls (Eser et al. 2004) and a longitudinal analysis of the same cohort of persons with complete SCI (Frotzler et al. 2008) found that tibial and femoral bone geometry and density properties reach a new steady-state within 3-8 YPI, with the time frame depending on bone parameter and skeletal site.

Endocrine changes may be contributing to the losses in bone density (Dauty et al. 2000; Szollar et al. 1998; Finsen et al. 1992; Vaziri et al. 1994; Bauman et al. 1995).  It is thought that altered bone structure and microarchitecture due to SCI (de Bruin et al. 2000; Eser et al. 2004; Giangregorio et al. 2005; Kiratli et al. 2000; Slade et al. 2005; Frotzler et al. 2008) leads to impaired calcium and phosphate metabolism and the parathyroid hormone (PTH)-vitamin D axis (Finsen et al. 1992; Vaziri et al. 1994; Bauman et al. 1995; Szollar et al. 1998; Dauty et al. 2000).  For instance, Bauman and colleagues (1995) noted that the reduction in the bioavailabilty of vitamin D in persons with SCI is similar to that found in AB elderly persons.  These changes have been shown to contribute to premature onset of osteoporosis and increased risk for fracture in total and regional sites following SCI when compared to the AB population (Garland et al. 1992; Szollar et al. 1997a; Szollar et al. 1997b; Dauty et al. 2000; Kiratli et al. 2000; Garland et al. 2001b; Vlychou et al. 2003; Eser et al. 2004; Giangregorio et al. 2005; Frotzler et al. 2008), which may be more related to YPI than chronological age (Bauman et al. 1999; Garland et al. 2001b). 

Age of SCI onset, however, may be an influential factor on the extent of the decline in bone loss (Garland et al. 2001b; Kiratli et al. 2000; Szollar et al. 1997a).  For instance, the findings by Szollar and colleagues (1997a) provides evidence that the BMD of persons with SCI are significantly lower than the AB population, but that YPI may be more influential on BMD changes in specific areas (i.e., femoral and trochanter regions), although older males may not be as severely impacted.  Persons who were 60 years or older had comparable levels to their age-matched AB controls in their BMD in all four regions (irrespective of YPI) whereas persons in the younger age categories had significant differences in their femoral regions at different intervals.  For instance, younger adults with SCI (20-39 year olds) had significantly lower BMD at 1-5 YPI and at 10-19 YPI in the femoral regions of their neck and trochanter when compared to their AB controls, and the mid-age group (40-59 year olds) only had lower BMD at 10-19 YPI in the femoral neck and trochanter regions.  These findings possibly allude to premature aging occurring at specific intervals post-injury, most notably in the first year, in the femoral region in younger persons with SCI, and are consistent with the other identified studies (Garland et al. 1992; Biering-Sorenson et al. 1990; de Bruin et al. 2005; Frey-Rindova et al. 2000; Wilmet et al. 1995; Chow et al. 1996; Szollar et al. 1997a; Szollar et al. 1997b; de Bruin et al. 2000; Kiratli et al. 2000; Eser et al. 2004; Frotzler et al. 2008).  It may be that age-related factors become less important on changes in bone mass when an individual reaches a certain chronological age threshold (i.e., 60 years).  At this point, other factors (i.e., immobilization) affecting bone mass may become more prominent.  In general,all of these changes provide additional support that premature aging is occurring

Gender also is an influential factor on bone loss.  Garland and colleagues (2001b) provide evidence that women with a complete SCI incur a rapid bone loss in the knee, resulting in a BMD that is approximately 40% to 45% of the AB population, and that this loss is greater than the loss seen in males with comparable injuries.  Unlike the findings by Szollar and colleagues (1997a), the pattern of bone loss of the hip was linear regardless of the age at the time of injury.  The findings by Bauman and colleagues (1999), which used a cross-sectional monozygotic twin design, also shows evidence that duration of injury may be more closely associated to bone loss than current age.  Although lifestyle habits such as smoking and alcohol intake were examined and found not to be significant, the sample in Bauman et al. (1999) study was quite small, and relatively young.   Similar findings were detected in a cross-sectional monozygotic twin study by Giangregorio and colleagues (2005) that had a sample comprised of two sets of female twins, one set whom was pre-menopausal and had a SCI twin with tetraplegia under 10 YPI, and the other whom was post-menopausal and a SCI twin with paraplegia who was greater than 20 years YPI.  However, they could not provide clarification whether the declines were associated with age, YPI, or menopausal status.  However, the study by Slade and colleagues (2005) who compared bone loss at the knee between AB and SCI women who were pre- and post-menopausal concluded that although age and estrogen effects could not be independently discerned, it was unloading (lack of weight bearing) that resulted in the deterioration of trabeculae that occurs early post-injury.  Given that SCI is uncommon in women, further studies are needed to further our understanding of the interaction between gender, SCI, and aging plays on bone loss. 

Interestingly, the lumbar spine BMD of persons with SCI appear to increase with age regardless of YPI.  Szollar and colleagues (1997a) interpreted this finding as either being representative of the lumbar spine becoming the primary weight bearing region or that neuropathic osetorarthropathy (i.e., spectrum of bone andjoint destructive processes associated with neurosensory deficit) may have caused diffused increased radiodensity of the spinal column.   The finding that BMD and BMC of the spine remains unaffected or increases is consistent with several other of the identified studies (Biering-Sorenson et al. 1990; Dauty et al. 2000; Chow et al. 1996; Garland et al. 2001b; Szollar et al. 1997b; Szollar et al. 1998), and are complementary to the findings by Catz and colleagues (1992).  Based on their findings, Catz et al. (1992) concluded that paraparesis does not accelerate the aging process of the lumbar spine, and that it may even prevent some expected spinal bone changes since no significant differences were detected between their group with SCI and their AB matched control group.  However, they noted that a limitation of their study was that 10 years may be too short a duration to detect any significant effects.  As well, the sample size was small, and consisted of a heterogeneous group of spinal cord etiologies (i.e., non-traumatic).  Finally, one study (Amsters and Nitz, 2006) found that postural changes, such as thoracic kyphosis, may also be independent of age and YPI.

With regard to the upper extremities, the musculoskeletal system appears to decline with YPI (Siddall et al. 2003; Jensen et al. 2005), with the incidence of shoulder pain increasing over time.  However, the role of chronological age may also be influential (Lal et al. 1998; Kivimäki et al. 2008).  The incidence of degenerative shoulder changes (Lal 1998) may be higher in persons with advanced age (older than 30 years) who are less than 10 YPI, suggesting that degenerative changes may occur earlier than previously thought in persons with SCI.

In addition to the lumbar spine, there are other areas of the musculoskeletal system that are not negatively impacted by aging.  For instance, handgrip strength may increase with YPI in males with paraplegia relative to AB controls (Petrofsky and Laymon 2002).  This may be due to the use of manual wheelchairs, as well as to age-related changes in muscle fiber composition, and/or to a reduction in intramuscular pressure (Petrofsky and Laymon 2002).   As well, older males with paraplegia (45 years and older) may have comparable levels of upper extremity strength to AB controls whereas younger adults do not (Pentland and Twomey 1994).

Conclusion

  • Premature aging may occur in the femoral and hip regions in persons with SCI. It may be that declines in bone mass occur rapidly following injury, and reach a new steady-state within 3-8 years post-injury, depending on the bone parameter and skeletal site.
  • Older males and females ( < 60 years) with SCI may not experience rapid declines in bone mass in certain regions when compared to able-bodied controls.
  • Duration of injury may be more associated with bone loss after SCI than chronological age.
  • Women with complete SCI may be at a greater risk for fracture at the knee compared to males with SCI and the able-bodied population.
  • Premature aging may not occur in the lumbar spine after SCI.
  • Upper limb pain in males with complete paraplegia may be attributed to longer durations of injury and not to the aging process.
  • The incidence of shoulder pain increases over time, and that age of onset may contribute to the development of pain. Adults with SCI (< 10 years post-injury) who were 30 years and older were more likely to report shoulder pain over time than those who were less than 30 years of age.
  • Premature aging may not occur in hand grip strength in men with complete paraplegia. Rather, continual wheelchair use may retard the aging process in relation to handgrip strength.
  • Regardless of age or years post-injury, persons with SCI may have increased thoracic kyphosis than the able-bodied population.
  • Persons with SCI may have reduced lung capacity compared to able-bodied controls, but this reduction is due to SCI and not aging.

Respiratory System

As a consequence of SCI, especially injury to the cervical and upper thoracic parts of the spinal cord, functioning of the respiratory muscles is disrupted, and leads to lowered lung volume parameters (Linn et al. 2000), in addition to other respiratory complications, such as decreases in compliance of the chest wall, changes in breathing patterns, sleep-disordered breathing (SBD), and ventilator dependency.

For individuals with SCI who have impaired autonomic function and impaired inspiratory muscle weakness, SDB may occur (Bonekat et al. 1990).  In general, the incidence of SDB, characterized by sleep apnea, is estimated to be at least twice that reported in the general population (Schilero et al. 2009).  Respiratory complications lead to significant morbidity and mortality in people with SCI (DeVivo et al. 1993; Cotton et al. 2005). 

Among the general population, age associated changes in the respiratory system involve loss of elastic recoil of the lung, and similar to SCI, yet for different reasons, decreases in the compliance of the chest wall, and strength of the respiratory muscles are observed (Janssens et al. 1999; Janssens 2005).  Complications resulting from SCI may therefore hold important respiratory implications as individuals’ age.

Table 5: Respiratory System

Discussion

Several of the identified studies highlight that SDB and other respiratory complications are higher in persons with SCI than in the general population (see Table 5).  In a five-year longitudinal study to assess changes in SDB, Bach and Wang (1994) measured oxygen desaturation, which is characteristic of sleep apnea, in 10 individuals with tetraplegia; six individuals had oxygen desaturation below 90%.  At the five-year follow-up, 5 of the 10 individuals had increased patterns of oxygen desaturation, leading to the conclusion that oxygen desaturation is common among people with tetraplegia and increases with age.   Cahan and colleagues (1993) produced similar findings in a case-control study.  Oxygen desaturation in 6 of 16 persons with tetraplegia was found to be outside the normative range of AB controls, and indicative of SDB.  In another longitudinal study (Berlowitz et al. 2005) sleep apnea, defined as an apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) of >10 events per hour, was found in 62% of the sample in the first month, peaking at 83% at 13 weeks, and falling to 68% and 62% at weeks 26 and 52 respectively. 

Snoring is another important indicator of sleep apnea and appears to be more prevalent among SCI populations.  In a large case-control study, 29% of men (N = 331) and 21% of women with SCI (N = 77) snored daily or almost daily compared to 18.2% of the control group (N = 339) representing the normal population of Denmark (Biering-Sorenson and Biering-Sorenson 2001).  Further, those with SCI snored louder and had been snoring for more years than those in the control group.  In addition, those who snored daily or almost daily in the SCI group were significantly older than those with SCI who snored less frequently. 

After SCI, there are temporal changes in pulmonary functioning.  Forced vital capacity (FVC), inspiratory capacity (IC), and maximum inspiratory mouth pressure (Pimax) are lowered in the acute stage of SCI, and then gradually improve over time.  Loveridge and colleagues (1992) showed that seated positioning imposes greater stress on the respiratory system in the acute stages of SCI than the supine position.  While breathing patterns in the supine position at all measured time points one-YPI were comparable to the controls (N = 18), breathing patterns in the seated position had to be adjusted in order to maintain minute ventilation.  Over time, however, improved breathing patterns were observed in the seated position, so much so that differences initially observed between the seated and supine positions became insignificant.  Such improved breathing pattern is speculated to be due to increased accessory muscle function, improved chest wall stability, thoraco-abdominal coupling, or a combination of these factors over time.  Loveridge et al. (1992) also determined that persons with tetraplegia (N = 6) retain the ability to take deep breaths but do not do so as frequently in the sitting position as they do while supinated.  An increasing shallow breathing pattern resulting from a lack of deep breaths, and other factors associated with SCI, such as obesity and decreased chest wall compliance, may lead to hypercapnia, or excessive amounts of carbon dioxide in the blood, and possibly ventilatory failure(Bach and Wang 1994).  Despite these results from this prospective longitudinal study, it is unclear if breathing patterns change as a result of the injury or due to aging with SCI.  The former may be the case as the study followed adjustments only during the first YPI.  No data are available on breathing patterns after individuals have adjusted long-term to their injury.

Sustaining a SCI often leads to an initial respiratory insufficiency and necessitates a need for mechanical ventilation.  In some instances, individuals may be weaned from the ventilator.  Wicks et al. (1986) conducted a 10-year retrospective study of ventilator-dependent patients with tetraplegia (N = 134) to determine factors associated with weaning and long-term survival rate.  Despite similar levels of injury, patients over 50 years of age had a 20% mortality rate compared to 6% for those younger than 50, and that ventilator weaning is less successful for those over the age of 50.  This suggests that ventilator-dependency among SCI individuals who are older than 50 possess a much greater risk of negative health outcomes (Wicks and Menter 1986).

Although there are additional factors that can affect respiratory health long-term for the individual with SCI (i.e., level and completeness), there are several preventative activities that can be done to minimize the aging of the respiratory system, such as not smoking, minimizing exposure to polluted air, and controlling body weight (Wilmot and Hall 1993).  Further work is required but the evidence that SDB is higher in persons with SCI may have implications for cardiovascular health for the aging SCI population and should be monitored.

Conclusion

  • There is Level 4 evidence from two longitudinal studies (Bach and Wang 1994; Berlowitz et al. 2005) and Level 5 evidence from two observational studies (Cahan et al. 1993; Biering-Sorenson and Biering-Sorenson 2001) that SDB as characterized by sleep apnea, oxygen desaturation, and snoring is more prevalent in SCI populations.
  • There is Level 4 evidence from two longitudinal studies (Bach and Wang 1994; Berlowitz et al. 2005) support that SDB may either increase or persist with the aging process.
  • There is Level 2 evidence from a longitudinal study with AB controls (Loveridge et al. 1992) that seated breathing patterns are compromised immediately post injury but recover over time. As well, persons with tetraplegia do not take deep breaths as often as AB individuals.
  • There is Level 4 evidence from a longitudinal study that adults over the age of 50 who are aging with ventilator dependency are at greater risk of death and are less likely to be weaned from their ventilators than younger adults aging with a ventilator (Wicks and Menter 1986).
  • Sleep disordered breathing may increase or persist with the aging process in persons with SCI.
  • Seated breathing patterns after tetraplegia are compromised early post-injury but recover over time.
  • Adults who are older (50 years +) and ventilator dependent have a higher mortality rate and lower weaning rate than adults who are younger and who are ventilator dependent.

Nervous System

Characteristics of an aging nervous system include diminished strength and reaction time (Fozard et al. 1994; Lynch et al. 1999), loss of vibratory sense (Knox 1994), reduced fine coordination and agility (Pathy 1985), slowing of motor unit recruitment patterns (Tax et al. 1990), declining function of basal ganglia (Roth and Joseph 1994) and cerebellarsystems (Bickford et al. 1999), and deterioration of station and gait (Greenhouse 1994).  Whether these normative changes occur in the morphology or structure of the brain is controversial (Aldwin and Gilmer 2004), but it is “generally felt to be the result of a loss of neurons, a diminuition of neuronal dendritic processes, and accompanying gliosis (Lammertse 1993, p. 129).  Aging also impacts the peripheral and autonomic systems, which respectively result in a progressive loss of nerve conduction velocity (Verdú et al. 2000), and impaired temperature regulation (Collins et al. 1977) and of baroreceptor reflexes (Duke et al. 1976).

In SCI, there is a lack of longitudinal evidence regarding the nervous system other than studies that evaluate neurological complications such as chronic pain (see Table 6).  Neuropathic chronic pain following SCI is a complex issue and results from the abnormal processing of sensory input due to damage to the nervous system (Cardenas and Rosenbluth 2001). It is often difficult to identify a specific stimulus or cause for neuropathic syndromes (Scadding 2003).  Although this pain can be identified by site (region of sensory disturbance) and by features (sharp, shooting, electric, burning, stabbing), individuals may find it difficult to describe the quality of neuropathic pain (Scadding 2003). Typically, neuropathic pain is present at- or below-the-level of lesion, and is constant but fluctuates in intensity depending on the individual’s emotional state or level of fatigue.  SCI-related studies that have examined factors associated with the development of pain have yielded mixed results. With regards to age, some studies have found an association between chronological age and pain (e.g., Burke 1973; Anke et al. 1995; Stormer et al. 1997; Dalyan et al. 1999; Siddall et al. 1999; Putzke et al. 2000), whereas others have found none (e.g., Subbarao et al. 1995; Rintala et al. 1998; Curtis et al. 1999).

Overall, the dearth of literature on the nervous system is relatively surprising given the implications of how age may influence the recovery process following injury.  It may be that reported sensory and motor deficits in persons with SCI of more than 20 YPI (Whiteneck et al. 1992) occur due to a presumed age-related dropout of anterior horn cells and loss of myelinated tracts (Charlifue et al. 2002).  As well, it is important to determine whether or not further deterioration in the autonomic nervous system occurs in the later decades of life, which hold implications for the gastrointestinal and genitourinary systems (Lammertse 1993). 

Table 6: Nervous System

Discussion

The most robust finding was that presence of pain at an earlier time point appears to be the best predictor of future pain, and that it likely does not change significantly over time (Jensen et al. 2005; Siddall et al. 2003; Putzke et al. 2002a; Rintala et al. 2004).   A limitation of most studies was the lack of clear assessments of the type and characteristics of pain being experienced by participants.  For instance, Putzke and colleagues (2002a) do not report on the quality (e.g., frequency, intensity, duration) or pain type (e.g., neuropathic, nociceptive, etc.) of their sample. Although their findings suggested that age of onset may be an important factor, pain is a complex issue that involves the interaction of biological, psycho-social, and environmental factors.    

In general, there are considerable gaps in knowledge regarding how the nervous system changes with aging with an SCI.  Although identified as an issue of importance more than a decade ago (Lammertse 1993), research on the nervous system still remains incomplete and speculative at best.

Conclusion

  • Younger persons (> 30 years) may have less pain interference at one and at two years post-injury than older persons (< 60 years).
  • Previous reports of pain interference after SCI, irrespective of age, may be predictive of later pain interference.

Skin and Subcutaneous Tissues

Skin undergoes structural and physiological changes resulting from both the natural aging process and being exposed to damaging environmental elements.  Over a lifetime, skin is observed to progressively degenerate.  Most notable are the changes and deterioration in the structure of the skin which are due to losses and/or a disordering of collagen, the protein primarily responsible for the tensile strength of skin, and elastin fibres (Farage et al. 2009).  The elderly, therefore, have an increased susceptibility to skin injuries such as pressure ulcers, and a decreased healing response.

Pressure ulcers are common among individuals with SCI, which typically occur over boney prominences, such as the ischial tuberosities and malleoli.  Damage to the skin and underlying tissue caused by pressure, shearing, and/or friction due to continuous sitting are the primary causes of developing a pressure ulcer, but as it has also been reported that collagen metabolism increases as a result of SCI.  People with SCI are therefore more susceptible to pressure ulcers than non-SCI individuals (Claus-Walker and Halstead 1982a; Claus-Walker and Halstead 1982b).  As a result of the combined effects of pressure, from sitting, and reduced skin integrity, due to collagen degradation, it is estimated that 85% of individuals with SCI will experience a pressure ulcer in their lifetime (Gunnewicht 1995).  Given that the mean cost of healing a wound is approximately $50,000, which translates into an annual cost of 3.6 billion dollars (Beckrich and Aronovitch 1999), there is a strong need to understand age-related changes to the skin following SCI in order to help minimize the occurrence of wounds.

Table 7: Skin and Subcutaneous Tissues

Discussion

The presence of glu-gal Hyl, a collagen metabolite, in large concentrations in urine is indicative of the degradation of skin collagen.  Although there is no evidence suggesting that glu-gal Hyl excretions increase with age after SCI (Rodriguez and Garber 1994), there is evidence that these levels are higher (but not statistically significant) in persons with SCI (N = 10) compared to the AB population (N = 5; Rodriguez and Claus-Walker 1984).  As well, there appears to be no differences in levels of plasma fibronectin, a macromolecular glycoprotein that contributes to wound healing, between persons with SCI (N = 31) and AB controls (N = 32;Vaziri et al. 1995).  Vaziri et al. (1995) also found that age or YPI were not significant factors on pressure ulcer development, which suggests that behavioural factors may play a stronger role (e.g., smoking).

In summary, the evidence on aging with SCI on the skin and subcutaneous tissues is limited (see Table 7).  Given the impact pressure ulcers holds for health and quality of life (Krause 1998; Jones et al. 2005; Saladin and Krause 2009), further work is needed to help identify factors which may minimize the sequelae of this health condition for people aging with SCI.

Conclusion

  • There is Level 2 evidence indicating that males with SCI have higher levels of a collagen metabolite, glu-gal Hyl, than AB controls (Rodriguez and Claus-Walker 1984).
  • There is Level 4 evidence (Rodriguez and Garber 1994) that increased excretions of glu-gal Hyl is significantly associated with development of pressure ulcers in males with SCI.
  • There is Level 2 evidence (Vaziri et al. 1995) suggesting that plasma fibronectin, as an indicator of wound healing, may rise in SCI male patients with fast healing ulcers but not in SCI patients with poor healing ulcers.
  • Males with SCI have higher levels of collagen metabolite, glu-gal Hyl, than the able-bodied population, which may be a sign of premature aging of the skin.  Further work is needed to conclusively demonstrate this.
  • Behavioural factors play a stronger role in the development of pressure ulcers in persons with SCI than either age or YPI.

Genitourinary and Gastrointestinal Systems

There are several normative age-related changes of the genitourinary and gastrointestinal systems that can lead to serious health problems for the elderly.  With regard to the genitourinary system, there is a progressive and structural breakdown of the kidneys with age, and problems with urinary continence that results from decreased bladder capacity and compliance, and an increase in involuntary bladder contractions (Aldwin and Gilmer 2004).  In males, enlargement of the prostate also contributes to incontinence (Dubeau 1997), and prostate cancer is one of the primary causes of death (McClain and Gray 2000).   Although urinary tract infections (UTIs) increase with age, women are at greater risk, with the incidence in males only approaching that of women when they are 60 years or older (Foxman 2002).  Unlike the genitourinary system, the gastrointestinal system retains much of its regular function, and it is unclear whether the few normal changes do affect the health of the older population.  Some potential issues include slowing in large intestine motility, and diminished gut motility, with an increase in water resorption in the colon, which contributes to hard stool and increased risk of constipation, rectal fissures, hemorrhoids, and diverticular diseases (Wilson et al. 1997).

In persons with SCI, the effects of neurogenic bladder may compound the effects of aging in persons with SCI (Madersbacher and Oberwalder 1987) since bladder management techniques, such as the use of indwelling catheters, may contribute to the occurrence of common complications such as UTIs (Charlifue et al. 1999) and for a higher risk of developing bladder cancer (Groah et al. 2002).  Similarly, neurogenic bowel may also compound aging after SCI given that persons with SCI often have higher rates of bowel-related complications compared to the general population (Cosman et al. 1993).

Table 8: Genitourinary and Gastrointestinal Systems

Discussion

From the list of identified studies on the genitourinary system (see Table 8), there are four longitudinal studies (Viera et al. 1986; DeWire et al. 1992; MacDiarmid et al. 1995; Sekar et al. 1997) suggesting there are no differences in renal function over time among persons using various bladder management techniques.  However, the samples of these studies did incur typical SCI-related complications such as UTIs and bladder stones, and there were some indications of renal decline.  For instance, Lamid (1988) found that after 4 YPI, the number of vesicoureteral refluxes increased and progressed to grades II and IV, which caused kidney damage with caliectasis in 27 of 32 patients with SCI followed over 12 YPI.   Finally, Sekar and colleagues (1997) reported that renal function (as measured by total and individual kidney effective renal plasma flow; ERPF) decreased over time in their SCI sample (N = 1,114) with a slight reversal occurring at 10 YPI.  A methodological strength of the study was the assessment of ERPF, which is thought to be a more sensitive measure of kidney function than serum creatinine (Kuhlemeier et al. 1984a).  Based on the findings of the identified studies, it may be that significant declines in renal function occur approximately at 5 YPI.   

Work regarding age of onset and the genitourinary system is also needed as the findings of a cross-sectional study by Kuhlemeier and colleagues (1984b) suggests that persons with acute SCI (N = 160) who were younger than 20 or older than 50 had comparable levels of individual and global kidney effective plasma flows compared to AB controls (N = 287), whereas persons with between 21-51 had impaired renal function.

Although six cross-sectional studies found there were no differences in serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) between persons with SCI and AB controls (Konety et al. 2000; Pramjudi et al. 2002; Pannek et al. 2003; Scott Sr et al. 2003; Alexandrino et al. 2004; Shim et al. 2008), one study (Scott Sr et al. 2003) did find elevated levels in persons with SCI (n = 7; 63.6%) at the time of cancer diagnosis compared to AB controls (n = 267; 29.1%) with prostate cancer, and that the cancer in individuals with SCI was more advanced or metastatic (p = .012).   Overall, the risk for prostate cancer appears to be lower in persons with SCI due to impaired testosterone levels, but prostate cancer screening should be encouraged given the possibility that males with SCI who do develop prostate cancer may have poorer outcomes than AB males (Scott Sr et al. 2003).

Although bowel function is clearly impaired in persons with SCI compared to AB controls, one study (Lynch et al. 2000) demonstrated that continence deteriorates with increasing age in an AB population (N = 467) but does not change with increasing age in persons with SCI (N = 467).  However, a 10 year longitudinal study (Faaborg et al. 2008) suggests persons with SCI do incur an increase in constipation-related symptoms over time.  Conversely, the need for assistance from medications or persons does not change, while fecal incontinence decreases.  It may be that bowel dysfunction worsens over time for persons with SCI but three studies (Menardo et al. 1987; Krogh et al. 2000; Emmanuel et al. 2009) provide evidence that level of injury plays a primary role in the extent of bowel dysfunction.  At this time, the SCI evidence on aging and the gastrointestinal system is limited, but attention to bowel symptoms should be incorporated into routine follow-up procedures and education (Charlifue et al. 2002).

Conclusion

  • There is Level 4 evidence (Viera et al. 1986; DeWire et al. 1992; MacDiarmid et al. 1995; Sekar et al. 1997) that there are no differences in renal functioning up to 4 YPI using various bladder management techniques with some decline occurring beyond that time.
  • There is Level 4 evidence (Lamid et al. 1988) that repeated episodes of vesicoureteral reflux can cause kidney damage as early as four YPI in some persons with SCI.
  • There is Level 4 evidence (Sekar et al. 1997) that renal plasma flow declines until 10 YPI after SCI, at which time, a slight reversal occurs.
  • There is Level 5 evidence (Kuhlemeier et al. 1984b) that suggests age of SCI onset may be an important factor related to renal function, with persons with SCI who are under 20 and older than 50 having comparable renal function to AB controls, whereas persons between those ages have impaired functioning compared to the general population.
  • There is Level 5 evidence from six studies (Konety et al. 2000; Pramjudi et al. 2002; Pannek et al. 2003; Scott Sr et al. 2003; Alexandrino et al. 2004; Shim et al. 2008) that males with SCI do not appear to be at higher risk for the development of prostate cancer compared to the general population.
  • There is Level 5 evidence (Scott Sr et al. 2003) that persons with SCI and prostate cancer have higher levels of prostate serum antigen at diagnosis and cancer that was more advanced and metastatic than AB controls with prostate cancer.
  • There is Level 5 evidence (Lynch et al. 2000) demonstrating a deterioration in bowel continence with increasing age in an AB population but no change with age in persons with SCI.
  • There is Level 4 evidence (Faaborg et al. 2008) suggesting persons with SCI do incur an increase in constipation-related symptoms and decrease in fecal incontincence over time.
  • There is Level 5 evidence from three studies (Menardo et al. 1987; Krogh et al. 2000; Emmanuel et al. 2009) that level of injury, and not necessarily age or YPI, plays a primary role in the extent of bowel dysfunction.
  • Various bladder management techniques (indwelling catheterization versus intermittent catheterization) may not impact renal functioning in persons with SCI over time.
  • Repeated episodes of vesicoureteral reflux can cause kidney damage as early as four years post-injury.
  • After SCI, renal plasma flow declines until 10 years post-injury, at which time, a slight reversal occurs.
  • Age of onset may play a role in minimizing renal decline, with adults who are under 20 and older than 50 having comparable renal functioning to the able-bodied population, while those between those ages have impaired functioning.
  • Males with SCI do not appear to be at higher risk for prostate cancer compared to the able-bodied male population.  However, males with SCI should be regularly screened since prostate cancer is more advanced and metastatic than the general population when detected.
  • Bowel continence increased with age in the able-bodied population but does not change in persons with SCI.
  • Persons with SCI may experience an increase in constipation-related symptoms and decrease in fecal incontinence over time.
  • Level of injury, and not age or years post-injury, plays a primary role in the extent of bowel dysfunction.

Quality of Life and Community Reintegration

It is not surprising that the majority of articles that met the inclusion criteria for this chapter were on quality of life (QoL).  As more persons survive into their second, third, and even later decades, living with a disability becomes a life-long process for persons with SCI (Hallin et al. 2000).  As a result, the goal of rehabilitation is to maximize functionality and independence to allow for successful community reintegration and high QoL.  QoL describes the well-being and life satisfaction of an individual, and is a multi-factorial construct, which includes but is not limited to, interpersonal relationships and social support, physical and mental health, environmental comfort, and a host of psycho-social factors (Kaplan and Erickson 2000).  Community reintegration is an important constructs shown to be predictive of life satisfaction in persons with SCI (e.g., Pierce et al. 1999; Richards et al. 1999; Putzke et al. 2002b; Tonack et al. 2008). The term community reintegration is used to refer to returning to the mainstream of family and community life, engaging in normal roles and responsibilities, actively contributing to one’s social groups and of society as a whole (Dijkers 1998).  Thus successful reintegration means resuming occupations or activities deemed important to the individual (i.e., self-care, employment, leisure, etc.; Yasui and Berven 2008).  The environment (e.g., social, institutional, cultural or physical), can either create barriers or facilitate access to the community at large. Without exception successful reintegration can lead to improved QoL (Anderson 2004).

In the general population, older adults may face limitations with activities of daily living (e.g., Hoyer et al. 1999), and experience functional declines in the physical domain (e.g., Branch and Jette 1983), which can negatively impact community reintegration and QoL. Similarly, both physical and mental health factors influence quality of life in persons with SCI. For instance, issues with poor physical health, secondary health conditions (e.g., pressure ulcers, pain, etc.), depression and stress, and have all been shown to negatively impact on QoL.

With regards to aging, however, there are some mixed findings in relation to community reintegration and QoL, even within the same studies. For instance, there are some reports that life satisfaction and community reintegration (at least in some domains) improve with years post-SCI (e.g., Zarb et al. 1990; Tonack et al. 2008), whereas older age is associated with poorer community reintegration and quality of life (e.g., Krause and Crewe 1990; Eisenberg and Saltz 1991; Whiteneck et al. 1992; Tonack et al. 2008). As well, some reports provide evidence that QoL improves with increasing age (e.g., Pentland et al. 1995; Westgren and Levi, 1998; Dijkers 1999; McColl 1999). However, discrepancies with aging and quality of life tend to be more evident in cross-sectional analyses whereas longitudinal studies “mostly show relatively high and stable levels of QoL over long periods of time” (Kemp and Ettelson 2001, p. 119).  As well, these differences may arise due to the use of different instruments, which may not all assess the same underlying QoL construct.

In this section (see Table 9), eleven longitudinal studies and one observational study on community reintegration and QoL after SCI are reviewed.  

Table 9: Quality of Life and Community Reintegration

Discussion

Aging is a complex process that not only encompasses biology.  Environmental factors also change over time, which may be particularly critical to persons with SCI, because they not only face physical limitations associated with their SCI, but also social and economic changes that result from injury (Krause and Coker 2006).  As seen in Bushnik and Charlifue (2005), changes were related to changes in economics and technology, and not related to SCI or aging per se.  For example, letter writing, which probably included emails, increased in the sample over time because home computing had likely become more common.  Although not significant, the high percentage of persons who switched to a portable ventilator or pneumobelt from a fixed ventilator may have improved community reintegration for these individuals.  As well, the findings that economic self-sufficiency steadily improves with time (e.g., Charlifue and Gerhart 2004a; Krause and Broderick 2005; Krause and Coker 2006) supports Bushnik’s (2002) speculation that increased economic standing may improve community reintegration.  In the case of Bushnik’s (2002) sample, improved financial status enabled access adaptive equipment (e.g., modified van).  Conversely, level of community reintegration for Charlifue and Gerhart’s (2004a) sample did not significantly change over time, but this may have been due to sample differences between the studies (i.e., high level tetraplegia versus homogeneous impairment groups), and that the time between data collection intervals in the other studies reviewed were further apart. As well, the individuals in Gerhart and Charlifue’s (2004a) study were at least 20 years post-injury when they entered the study.  At 20 years post-injury, it is likely that routines and strategies for community participation have been well-established, and are not likely to dramatically change over 3 year periods.  However, an understanding of environmental factors is important for assessing quality of life since there is evidence that an individual’s adjustment over time is influenced by corresponding environmental changes (Krause and Sternberg 1997).

With regards to change in activity patterns, Bushnik and Charlifue (2005) attributed the changes to the natural progression of time utilization from external social activities associated with youth (e.g., card games with friends) to other activities not captured by the study (e.g., spending time with family).  Further, the reported declines in activity by the SCI cohorts as they aged (Bushnik’s (2002), Charlifue and Gerhart’s (2004a), and Krause and Broderick’s (2005) might be similar to declines in activity patterns in the general population (Christensen et al. 1996; Bukov et al. 2002).

One of the main strengths of the studies by Krause (1997), Krause and Broderick (2005), and Krause and Coker (2006) is they assessed whether there were any differences between their current sample and those who were lost to follow-up. Based on these analyses, clear survivor effects emerged in both studies as the characteristics of respondents (persons who participated in both data collection periods) at Time 1 were younger, younger at age of SCI-onset, were less years post-injury, had higher levels of education, more likely to have cervical injuries, greater sitting tolerance, and had more social outings than non-respondents (persons who only participated in the first data collection period). These findings highlight that some care should be taken when interpreting the findings from these studies as it may only reflect ‘survivors’.

Although having a SCI inevitably does place some form of activity limitation from the onset of injury, aging “may magnify issues of dependency as needs, ability, and limitation change over time” (Charlifue and Lammertse 2001, p. 415).  As with the general population (Roy 1986; Gaston-Johansson et al. 1996; Poluri et al. 2005), issues of fatigue and pain can limit the independence of a person with SCI.  Fatigue can be defined as an overwhelming sense of tiredness, lack of energy and often a feeling of total exhaustion (Herlofson & Larsen, 2002).  Fatigue after SCI is a prevalent issue (Gerhart et al. 1999; McColl et al. 2003; McColl et al. 2004; Fawkes-Kirby et al. 2008).  The findings on the associations between age and fatigue after SCI have been somewhat conflicting.  For example, one study found that males with SCI reported an increased fatigue with increasing age (Pentland et al., 1995), whereas some have found greater reports of fatigue in younger persons with SCI with short durations of injury (McColl et al. 2003). 

Both pain and fatigue have been both found to negatively impact on several domains of function and QoL (Rintala et al. 1998; Ingles et al. 1999; Herlofson and Larsen 2002).  As well, there is some evidence of a relationship between fatigue and pain after SCI (Fawkes-Kirby et al. 2008; Hammell et al. 2008).  When examined together, the study by Charlifue and colleagues (1999) and by Putzke and colleagues (2002a) highlight chronological age as a factor that mediates the expression and/or onset of change. In the study by Charlifue et al. (1999), the youngest and oldest group reported no significant changes between Time 1 and Time 2.  Similarly, the youngest and oldest group reported the least amount of pain interference between Year 1 and Year 2. 

The finding by Charlifue and colleagues (1999) that increasing age is associated with increased fatigue and additional physical assistance is congruent with other studies examining the effects of long-term SCI (e.g., Gerhart et al. 1993; Thompson, 1999; Liem et al. 2004).   A limitation noted by Charlifue et al. (1999) was that their sample was a relatively ‘young’ age (M = 37.1 years), and none having lived with their SCI for more than 20 years (M = 9.3), and may not have been impacted by the aging process to significantly impact overall health and functional status.  However, the consistent findings for increased fatigue between Time 1 and Time 2 do highlight that there is a consistent physical decline occurring.  Charlifue and colleagues (1999) recognized the systematic changes in their sample (i.e., improved health but declining functionality) but attributed them to external factors such as less contact with the healthcare system, funding changes, which lead to fewer participants reporting particular outcomes.  As well, they noted the need for increased physical assistance over time in their sample may have reflected attitude changes in rehabilitation practice where maintaining functionality is preferred over complete physical independence.  Although the strength of the study is its provision of several perspectives to aging with a SCI, an alternative analysis strategy might have helped to provide a more cohesive model of how the factors assessed related to one another.  For instance, the increases in physical assistance between Time 1 and Time 2 were often accompanied with improvements in health but also with increases in fatigue.  Reporting on associations (or lack of) between these variables may have provided additional support for their conclusions. 

The studies reviewed provide some interesting findings regarding living long-term with SCI, but do highlight some of the challenges associated with assessing quality of life in relation to aging.  The findings appear to provide some conflicting evidence where in some cases life satisfaction remained stable over time (i.e., Charlifue et al. 2004; Charlifue and Gerhart 2004b), decreased with time (i.e., Krause 1997; Charlifue et al. 1998), or improved with time (Kemp and Krause 1999).  The discrepancies in these studies are partly due to theoretical and methodological differences.  For instance, the study by Charlifue et al. (1998) was the only study that explicitly provided a theoretical model for assessing life satisfaction.  Specifically, Charlifue and colleagues (1998) framed aging with SCI within a global thesis of function, which took into account physical, psychological, and environmental factors.  Several studies with lower levels of evidence predicting life satisfaction have used other models that incorporate a variety of domains thought to impact on QoL (i.e., Pierce et al. 1999; Richards et al. 1999; Tonack et al. 2008).  Unfortunately, Charlifue et al. (1998) did not provide a clear rationale for including specific predictor variables in their models.  A larger theoretical concern is the issue of response shift (also known as recalibration, reprioritization, and reconceptualization; Schwartz and Spangers 2000), which refers to a dynamic process where an individual undergoes simultaneous changes in their internal standards, values, and conceptulizations of QoL in response to health and physical functioning changes (Tate et al. 2002).  Ambiguous or paradoxical findings can occur because of differences among people or changes within people regarding internal standards, values, or conceptualization of health-related QoL (Schwartz et al. 2007).  As a result, the psychometric properties (e.g., validity and reliability) of measurement tools can be affected (Schwartz et al. 2007).  Hence, issues of response shift should be considered when assessing QoL in persons with SCI, and several recommendations are put forth by Schwartz and colleagues (2007) on how to address them.

In terms of research design, comparing persons with SCI to control groups will also likely provide a different picture on QoL in different domains.  A strength of Kemp and Krause’s (1999) was the use of an able-bodied, and a disabled (i.e., polio) comparison group when examining issues of QoL after SCI as it provides some context to the extent of some problems for persons post-SCI (i.e., levels of depression).  However, the characteristics of the control groups were significantly different to the group with SCI on some key factors. For instance, the able-bodied and polio groups were significantly older (p < 0.01) and had higher levels of education than the group with SCI (p < 0.05). As well, the polio group was comprised mostly of females, had a mean pediatric age of onset, was 50.9 years post-polio, and 90% were Caucasian, whereas the SCI group was comprised of mostly males from culturally diverse backgrounds, and who had an adult age of onset, and were only 14.5 years post-injury. This limitation was addressed in the study, but highlights that the findings should be interpreted with caution since many socio-demographic and historical factors may have influenced levels of depression and life satisfaction. Nonetheless, the finding that persons with SCI have lower QoL compared to the able-bodied population is consistent with other studies that did not meet the chapter’s inclusion criteria (Kemp and Ettelson 2001).

Conclusion

  • There is Level 4 evidence from four longitudinal studies (Bushnik 2002; Bushnik and Charlifue 2005; Krause and Broderick 2005; Krause and Coker 2006) that changes in environmental factors over time (i.e., economics; technology) may influence QoL in persons with SCI rather than the aging process per se.
  • There is Level 4 evidence from two longitudinal studies (Charlifue and Gerhart 2004a; Bushnik and Charlifue 2005) that community reintegration declines with age after SCI. However, these changes in community reintegration may be similar as compared to the aging general population.
  • There is Level 4 evidence from three longitudinal studies (Bushnik 2002; Charlifue and Gerhart 2004a; Bushnik and Charlifue 2005) that perceived QoL does not change as one ages with SCI.
  • There is Level 4 evidence from a longitudinal study (Krause 1997) that selected domains of life satisfaction (i.e., social life and sex life) decrease as one ages with an SCI. It may be that these changes in satisfaction of certain domains are comparable to changes in the general population.
  • There is Level 4 evidence from a longitudinal study (Kemp and Krause 1999) that age of SCI-onset may be an influential factor on life satisfaction.
  • There is Level 4 evidence from two longitudinal studies (Charlifue et al. 2004a; Charlifue and Gerhart 2004b) that previous perceptions of life satisfaction are predictive of later perceptions of life satisfaction.
  • There is Level 5 evidence from an observational study (Kemp and Krause 1999) that life satisfaction is lower for persons with SCI compared to the general population.
  • There is Level 5 evidence from a longitudinal study (Putzke et al. 2002a) that previous reports of pain interference after SCI, irrespective of age, are predictive of later pain interference.
  • There is Level 5 evidence from a longitudinal study (Charlifue et al. 1999) that fatigue and the need for physical assistance increases over time with SCI.
  • Selected domains of life satisfaction (i.e., social life and sex life) may decline as one ages with a SCI. It may be that these changes in satisfaction of certain domains are comparable to changes in the general population.
  • Changes in environmental factors over time (i.e., economics; technology) may influence QOL in persons with SCI rather than the aging process per se.
  • Community participation may decline with age after SCI. However, these changes in community participation may be similar to the aging general population.
  • Fatigue and the need for physical assistance may increase over time with SCI.
  • Perceived QOL may not change as one ages with SCI.
  • Age of SCI-onset may be an influential factor on life satisfaction.
  • Previous perceptions of life satisfaction may be predictive of later perceptions of life satisfaction.

Summary

The majority of studies for all the systems provide some important findings regarding the role of chronological age (including age of SCI onset) and YPI, but there is still lack of clarity on how all of these factors affect (individually and in combination) the individual living with SCI over time, and further work is needed to determine if SCI is indeed a model for premature aging.  It appears that the field of aging with SCI has yet to make significant advances since many of the issues and questions raised over 15 years ago (Whiteneck et al. 1993) are still relevant today.

In general, longitudinal designs are the preferred method for investigating aging, but a number of longitudinal aging-related studies of SCI are limited in scope and quality due to several methodological issues (Krause 2007).  One limitation with longitudinal research designs are problems with retaining sufficient sample size over many years to observe long term changes with aging.  Problems with attrition lead to another type of cohort effect, namely survivor effects.  Survivor effects describe those individuals who may have outlived other members in their cohort due to some unusual advantage (e.g., environmental, physiological, etc.; Adkins 2001).  Persons who remain in longitudinal studies often represent those who are healthier, wealthier, and better educated whereas persons with poorer functioning drop-out or have died.  Another limitation of longitudinal designs is the possibility that data collected at an earlier time point may become obsolete due to advances or changes in measurement.  Longitudinal research is also considerably more resource intensive than cross-sectional studies in terms of cost and time.

Despite the challenges associated with longitudinal research, gaining an understanding of what changes a person with SCI may undergo over time is important to identify potential problems that can be anticipated and perhaps prevented in some cases.  This in turn may contribute to continued levels of maximum independence and overall well-being.  The field of aging with SCI has made some tremendous strides forward, but the dearth of knowledge in some areas highlights research opportunities that will help to resolve current challenges and more importantly provide information to fill many existing gaps.

  • There is Level 5 evidence from an observational study (Samsa et al. 1993) that life expectancy for males with SCI is lower than the general male population.
  • There is Level 5 evidence from an observational study (Samsa et al. 1993) that persons who were injured at a younger age (SCI onset approximately < 30 years) will have a longer life expectancy than persons injured at an older age (SCI onset approximately > 30 years).
  • There is Level 5 evidence from an observational study (Samsa et al. 1993) that causes of death post-SCI are beginning to approximate those of the general population.
  • There is Level 5 evidence from a cross-sectional study (Bauman and Spungen 2001) that plasma homocysteine levels are higher in persons with SCI compared to the AB population, with the greatest discrepancy in older adults with SCI (> 50 years).
  • There is Level 5 evidence from seven cross-sectional studies (Zlotolow et al. 1992; Huang et al. 1993; Bauman and Spungen 1994; Bauman et al. 1996; Huang et al. 1998; Bauman et al. 1999; Demirel et al. 2001; Liang et al. 2007; Wang et al. 2007) that abnormal lipid profiles after SCI may contribute to the development of cardiovascular disease.
  • There is Level 4 evidence (Apstein and George 1998) that total cholesterol (TC), total glycerides (TG), and low-density lipoproteins (LDL) increased while LDL/high-density lipoproteins (HDL) ratios decreased for males with tetraplegia and paraplegia from the acute phase until 1 YPI. All lipid profiles were significantly depressed compared to controls.
  • There is Level 4 evidence (Apstein and George 1998) that persons with tetraplegia had low HDL and elevated LDL/HDL ratios, which placed them at increased risk for coronary artery disease.
  • There is Level 5 evidence (Wang et al. 2007) that C-reactive protein levels are higher in males with SCI compared to AB controls, which could also account for the decreases in TC, LDL, HDL. C-reactive protein levels may also partly explain why persons with SCI are at increased risk for accelerated atherogenesis.
  • There is Level 5 evidence (Orakzai et al. 2007) that persons with SCI have greater atherosclerotic burden compared to an AB reference population.
  • There is Level 5 evidence from two studies that men with complete paraplegia have an abnormal (absent) heart rate response (Petrofsky and Laymon 2002)
  • There is Level 5 evidence that men with complete tetraplegia demonstrate increased blood pressure (Yamamoto et al. 1999).
  • There is Level 5 evidence (Tsitouras et al. 1995; Wang et al. 1992; Cheville et al. 1995; Shetty et al. 1999) that there is SCI related lower secretion of testosterone and human growth hormone levels in persons with SCI compared to AB controls.
  • There is Level 5 evidence from two studies (Tsitouras et al. 1995; Bauman et al. 1994) that serum IGF-I levels are impaired in persons with SCI compared to the AB population, and may be a sign of premature aging.
  • There is Level 5 evidence from three studies (Bauman and Spungen 1994; Jones et al. 2004; Liang et al. 2007) that glucose intolerance is lower after SCI, which may lead to an increased risk for premature diabetes mellitus.
  • There is Level 5 evidence (LaVela et al. 2006) that diabetes mellitus occurs prematurely in male veterans with SCI compared to AB veteran controls.
  • Six studies (Nuhlicek et al. 1988; Bauman et al. 1996; Bauman et al. 1999; Spungen et al. 2000; Jones et al. 2003; Jones et al. 2004) provide Level 5 evidence that persons with SCI are likely to have higher levels of fat mass, and that age-related declines of lean tissue in males with SCI may occur at a significantly faster rate than the AB population.
  • There is Level 5 evidence from one monozygotic twin study (Bauman et al. 2004) that basal and resting energy expenditures are lower in males with SCI compared to their AB twin.
  • There is Level 5 evidence (Campagnolo et al. 1994; Campagnolo et al. 1996; Furlan et al. 2006) that the immune function of persons with acute and chronic SCI is compromised compared to the AB population, but there is no influence due to aging.
  • There is Level 4 evidence from 8 longitudinal studies (Biering-Sorenson et al. 1990; Garland et al. 1992; Wilmet et al. 1995; de Bruin et al. 2000; Frey-Rindova et al. 2000; Garland et al. 2004; de Bruin et al. 2005; Frotzler et al. 2008) and Level 5 evidence from 12 studies (Chow et al. 1996; Szollar et al. 1997a; Szollar et al. 1997b; Szollar et al. 1998; Bauman et al. 1999; Dauty et al. 2000; Kiratli et al. 2000; Garland et al. 2001b; Vlychou et al. 2003; Eser et al. 2004; Giangregorio et al. 2005; Slade et al. 2005) that there is a rapid loss of bone in the hip and lower extremities following SCI, and that this loss is significantly lower than the AB population.
  • There is Level 2 evidence (Frotzler et al. 2008) and Level 5 evidence (Eser et al. 2004) that tibial and femoral bone geometry and density properties reach a new steady-state within 3-8 YPI, with the time frame depending on bone parameter and skeletal site.
  • There is Level 5 evidence from three studies (Szollar et al. 1997a; Szollar et al. 1998; Garland et al. 2001b) that older males and females with SCI may not experience as rapid of a decline in bone mass compared to AB controls.
  • There is Level 5 evidence from two studies (Bauman et al. 1999; Garland et al. 2001b) that YPI may be more associated with bone loss after SCI than chronological age.
  • There is Level 5 evidence (Slade et al. 2005) that there are differences in bone geometric indices and in structural properties in the lower extremities of women with SCI compared to the AB women.
  • There is Level 5 evidence from five studies (Finsen et al. 1992; Vaziri et al. 1994; Bauman et al. 1995; Szollar et al. 1998; Dauty et al. 2000) suggesting that there are impaired biochemical and bone markers in persons with SCI compared to AB controls that persons with SCI are at greater risk for fracture due to the premature development of osteoporosis.
  • There is Level 2 evidence from a longitudinal study with AB controls (Catz et al. 1992), Level 4 evidence from a longitudinal study (Biering-Sorenson et al. 1990), and Level 5 evidence from five studies (Chow et al. 1996; Szollar et al. 1997a; Szollar et al. 1997b; Szollar et al. 1998; Garland et al. 2001b) that premature aging does not occur in the lumbar spine after SCI. The possibility that the lumbar spine becomes the primary weight bearing region, along with immobilization, may serve to protect age-related bone loss changes to this region.
  • There is Level 5 evidence (Amsters and Nitz 2006) that persons with SCI, regardless of age or YPI, had increased thoracic kyphosis compared to AB controls.
  • There is Level 5 evidence from two studies (Pentland and Twomey 1994; Petrofsky and Laymon 2002) that decreased hand grip strength does not occur in men with complete paraplegia and that continual wheelchair use may retard this aging process.
  • There is Level 5 evidence (Pentland and Twomey 1994) that upper limb pain in males with complete paraplegia who use manual wheelchairs may be attributed to longer YPI and not to chronological age.
  • There is Level 2 evidence from two longitudinal studies (Siddall et al. 2003; Jensen et al. 2005) showing that the incidence of shoulder pain increases over time in persons with SCI.
  • There is Level 2 evidence from a longitudinal study (Lal 1998) and Level 5 evidence (Kivimäki et al. 2008) that highlights chronological age having an important influence on developing shoulder pain.
  • There is Level 4 evidence from two longitudinal studies (Bach and Wang 1994; Berlowitz et al. 2005) and Level 5 evidence from two observational studies (Cahan et al. 1993; Biering-Sorenson and Biering-Sorenson 2001) that SDB as characterized by sleep apnea, oxygen desaturation, and snoring is more prevalent in SCI populations.
  • There is Level 4 evidence from two longitudinal studies (Bach and Wang 1994; Berlowitz et al. 2005) support that SDB may either increase or persist with the aging process.
  • There is Level 2 evidence from a longitudinal study with AB controls (Loveridge et al. 1992) that seated breathing patterns are compromised immediately post injury but recover over time. As well, persons with tetraplegia do not take deep breaths as often as AB individuals.
  • There is Level 4 evidence from a longitudinal study that adults over the age of 50 who are aging with ventilator dependency are at greater risk of death and are less likely to be weaned from their ventilators than younger adults aging with a ventilator (Wicks and Menter 1986).
  • There is Level 4 evidence (Putzke et al. 2002a; Siddall et al. 2003; Rintala et al. 2004; Jensen et al. 2005) that the early onset of SCI-related pain is likely to be maintained over time, with some evidence indicating that the degree of interference experienced might be impacted by age of onset (Jensen et al. 2005).
  • There is Level 2 evidence indicating that males with SCI have higher levels of a collagen metabolite, glu-gal Hyl, than AB controls (Rodriguez and Claus-Walker 1984).
  • There is Level 4 evidence (Rodriguez and Garber 1994) that increased excretions of glu-gal Hyl is significantly associated with development of pressure ulcers in males with SCI.
  • There is Level 2 evidence (Vaziri et al. 1995) suggesting that plasma fibronectin, as an indicator of wound healing, may rise in SCI male patients with fast healing ulcers but not in SCI patients with poor healing ulcers.
  • There is Level 4 evidence (Viera et al. 1986; DeWire et al. 1992; MacDiarmid et al. 1995; Sekar et al. 1997) that there are no differences in renal functioning up to 4 YPI using various bladder management techniques with some decline occurring beyond that time.
  • There is Level 4 evidence (Lamid et al. 1988) that repeated episodes of vesicoureteral reflux can cause kidney damage as early as four YPI in some persons with SCI.
  • There is Level 4 evidence (Sekar et al. 1997) that renal plasma flow declines until 10 YPI after SCI, at which time, a slight reversal occurs.
  • There is Level 5 evidence (Kuhlemeier et al. 1984) that suggests age of SCI onset may be an important factor related to renal function, with persons with SCI who are under 20 and older than 50 having comparable renal function to AB controls, whereas persons between those ages have impaired functioning compared to the general population.
  • There is Level 5 evidence from six studies (Konety et al. 2000; Pramjudi et al. 2002; Pannek et al. 2003; Scott Sr et al. 2003; Alexandrino et al. 2004; Shim et al. 2008) that males with SCI do not appear to be at higher risk for the development of prostate cancer compared to the general population.
  • There is Level 5 evidence (Scott Sr et al. 2003) that persons with SCI and prostate cancer have higher levels of prostate serum antigen at diagnosis and cancer that was more advanced and metastatic than AB controls with prostate cancer.
  • There is Level 5 evidence (Lynch et al. 2000) demonstrating a deterioration in bowel continence with increasing age in an AB population but no change with age in persons with SCI.
  • There is Level 4 evidence (Faaborg et al. 2008) suggesting persons with SCI do incur an increase in constipation-related symptoms and decrease in fecal incontincence over time.
  • There is Level 5 evidence from three studies (Menardo et al. 1987; Krogh et al. 2000; Emmanuel et al. 2009) that level of injury, and not necessarily age or YPI, plays a primary role in the extent of bowel dysfunction.
  • There is Level 4 evidence from four longitudinal studies (Bushnik 2002; Bushnik and Charlifue 2005; Krause and Broderick 2005; Krause and Coker 2006) that changes in environmental factors over time (i.e., economics; technology) may influence QoL in persons with SCI rather than the aging process per se.
  • There is Level 4 evidence from two longitudinal studies (Charlifue and Gerhart 2004a; Bushnik and Charlifue 2005) that community reintegration declines with age after SCI. However, these changes in community reintegration may be similar as compared to the aging general population.
  • There is Level 4 evidence from three longitudinal studies (Bushnik 2002; Charlifue and Gerhart 2004a; Bushnik and Charlifue 2005) that perceived QoL does not change as one ages with SCI.
  • There is Level 4 evidence from a longitudinal study (Krause 1997) that selected domains of life satisfaction (i.e., social life and sex life) decrease as one ages with an SCI. It may be that these changes in satisfaction of certain domains are comparable to changes in the general population.
  • There is Level 4 evidence from a longitudinal study (Kemp and Krause 1999) that age of SCI-onset may be an influential factor on life satisfaction.
  • There is Level 4 evidence from two longitudinal studies (Charlifue et al. 2004a; Charlifue and Gerhart 2004b) that previous perceptions of life satisfaction are predictive of later perceptions of life satisfaction.
  • There is Level 5 evidence from an observational study (Kemp and Krause 1999) that life satisfaction is lower for persons with SCI compared to the general population.
  • There is Level 5 evidence from a longitudinal study (Putzke et al. 2002a) that previous reports of pain interference after SCI, irrespective of age, are predictive of later pain interference.
  • There is Level 5 evidence from a longitudinal study (Charlifue et al. 1999) that fatigue and the need for physical assistance increases over time with SCI.

Key Points

  • Life-expectancy for males with SCI is likely lower than the general male population.
  • Persons injured at a younger age will likely have a longer life expectancy than persons injured at an older age.
  • Causes of death post-SCI may be beginning to approximate those of the general population.
  • SCI may represent a model for premature aging. There is strong evidence that the endocrine and musculoskeletal systems are prematurely aging, while there is limited evidence for the respiratory, skin and subcutaneous tissues, genitourinary, and gastrointestinal systems. There is weak and limited evidence that the immune and nervous system are prematurely aging.
  • Greater levels of arthersclerotic burden, higher levels of C-reactive protein levels and abnormal lipid profiles compared to the able-bodied population increases the risk for the development of cardiovascular disease in persons with SCI.
  • Men with complete SCI have abnormal heart rate and blood pressure responses compared to able-bodied controls, which are indicative of altered autonomic control, but not from advancing aging per se.
  • Impaired secretion of both testosterone and human growth hormone may be due to SCI, and not from advancing age per se.
  • Serum IGF-I levels may be impaired compared to the able-bodied population, which may be a sign of premature aging.
  • Glucose intolerance may be impaired in persons with SCI, which may lead to an increased risk for premature diabetes mellitus.
  • Persons with SCI are at higher risk for the development of cardiovascular disease and diabetes mellitus than the able-bodied population.
  • Persons with SCI may have higher levels of fat mass than the able-bodied population.
  • Age-related declines of lean tissue in males with SCI may occur at a significantly faster rate than the able-bodied population.
  • Age of onset may not influence hematologic abnormalities at the acute phase post-SCI (within first week post-injury).
  • Immune function after SCI at both the acute and chronic phase is compromised compared to able-bodied controls, but age may not play an important role.
  • Premature aging may occur in the femoral and hip regions in persons with SCI. It may be that declines in bone mass occur rapidly following injury, and reach a new steady-state within 3-8 years post-injury, depending on the bone parameter and skeletal site.
  • Older males and females ( < 60 years) with SCI may not experience rapid declines in bone mass in certain regions when compared to able-bodied controls.
  • Duration of injury may be more associated with bone loss after SCI than chronological age.
  • Women with complete SCI may be at a greater risk for fracture at the knee compared to males with SCI and the able-bodied population.
  • Premature aging may not occur in the lumbar spine after SCI.
  • Upper limb pain in males with complete paraplegia may be attributed to longer durations of injury and not to the aging process.
  • The incidence of shoulder pain increases over time, and that age of onset may contribute to the development of pain. Adults with SCI (< 10 years post-injury) who were 30 years and older were more likely to report shoulder pain over time than those who were less than 30 years of age.
  • Premature aging may not occur in hand grip strength in men with complete paraplegia. Rather, continual wheelchair use may retard the aging process in relation to handgrip strength.
  • Regardless of age or years post-injury, persons with SCI may have increased thoracic kyphosis than the able-bodied population.
  • Persons with SCI may have reduced lung capacity compared to able-bodied controls, but this reduction is due to SCI and not aging.
  • Sleep disordered breathing may increase or persist with the aging process in persons with SCI.
  • Seated breathing patterns after tetraplegia are compromised early post-injury but recover over time.
  • Adults who are older (50 years +) and ventilator dependent have a higher mortality rate and lower weaning rate than adults who are younger and who are ventilator dependent.
  • Younger persons (> 30 years) may have less pain interference at one and at two years post-injury than older persons (< 60 years).
  • Previous reports of pain interference after SCI, irrespective of age, may be predictive of later pain interference.
  • Males with SCI have higher levels of collagen metabolite, glu-gal Hyl, than the able-bodied population, which may be a sign of premature aging of the skin. Further work is needed to conclusively demonstrate this.
  • Behavioural factors play a stronger role in the development of pressure ulcers in persons with SCI than either age or YPI.
  • Various bladder management techniques (indwelling catheterization versus intermittent catheterization) may not impact renal functioning in persons with SCI over time.
  • Repeated episodes of vesicoureteral reflux can cause kidney damage as early as four years post-injury.
  • After SCI, renal plasma flow declines until 10 years post-injury, at which time, a slight reversal occurs.
  • Age of onset may play a role in minimizing renal decline, with adults who are under 20 and older than 50 having comparable renal functioning to the able-bodied population, while those between those ages have impaired functioning.
  • Males with SCI do not appear to be at higher risk for prostate cancer compared to the able-bodied male population. However, males with SCI should be regularly screened since prostate cancer is more advanced and metastatic than the general population when detected.
  • Bowel continence increased with age in the able-bodied population but does not change in persons with SCI.
  • Persons with SCI may experience an increase in constipation-related symptoms and decrease in fecal incontinence over time.
  • Level of injury, and not age or years post-injury, plays a primary role in the extent of bowel dysfunction.
  • Selected domains of life satisfaction (i.e., social life and sex life) may decline as one ages with a SCI. It may be that these changes in satisfaction of certain domains are comparable to changes in the general population.
  • Changes in environmental factors over time (i.e., economics; technology) may influence QOL in persons with SCI rather than the aging process per se.
  • Community participation may decline with age after SCI. However, these changes in community participation may be similar to the aging general population.
  • Fatigue and the need for physical assistance may increase over time with SCI.
  • Perceived QOL may not change as one ages with SCI.
  • Age of SCI-onset may be an influential factor on life satisfaction.
  • Previous perceptions of life satisfaction may be predictive of later perceptions of life satisfaction.

References

  • Abel R, Cerrel Bazo HA, Kluger PJ, Selmi F, Meiners T, Vaccaro A, J Ditunno J, Gerner HJ.  Management of degenerative changes and stenosis of the lumbar spinal canal secondary to cervical spinal cord injury.  Spinal Cord.  2003; 41: 211-219.
  • Adkins RH. Research issues in aging studies associated with SCI. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2001; 6: 128-135.
  • Adkins RH. Research and interpretation perspectives on aging related physical morbidity with spinal cord injury and brief review of systems. NeuroRehabil. 2004; 19: 3-13.
  • Alander DH, Andreychik DA, Stauffer ES. Early outcome in cervical cord injured patients older than 50 years of age. Spine. 1994; 19: 2299-2301.
  • Alander DH, Parker J, Stauffer ES. Intermediate-term outcome of cervical spinal cord-injured patients older than 50 years of age. Spine. 1997; 11: 1189-1192.
  • Aldwin CM, Gilmer DF. Health, Illness, and Optimal Aging. Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, California, 2004.
  • Alexandrino AP, Rodrigues MAF, Matsuo T. Evaluation of serum and seminal levels of prostate specific antigen in men with spinal cord injury. J Urol.  2004; 171: 2230-2232.
  • Amsters D, Nitz J. The consequences of increasing age and duration of injury upon the wheelchair posture of men with tetraplegia. Int J Rehabil.  2006; 29: 347-349.
  • Anderson KD. Targeting recovery: Priorities of the spinal cord-injured population. J Neurotrauma. 2004; 21:1371-1383.
  • Anke AG, Stenehjem AE, Stanghelle JK. Pain and life quality within 2 years of spinal cord injury. Paraplegia. 1995; 33: 555-559.
  • Apstein MD, George BC. Serum lipids during the first year following acute spinal cord injury. Metabolism. 1998;47: 367-370.
  • Ashe MC, Craven C, Krassioukov A, Eng JJ (2006). Bone Health Following Spinal Cord Injury. In: Eng JJ, Teasell RW, Miller WC, Wolfe DL, Townson AF, Aubut J, Abramson C, Hsieh JTC, Connolly S, editors. Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Evidence. Vancouver, p 9.1-9.18.
  • Bach JR, Wang TG. Pulmonary function and sleep disordered breathing in patients with traumatic tetraplegia: A longitudinal study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994; 75: 279-284.
  • Ballinger DA, Rintala DH, Hart KA. The relation of shoulder pain and range-of-motion problems to functional limitations, disability, and perceived health of men with spinal cord injury: a multifaceted longitudinal study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000; 81: 1575-1581.
  • Bauman WA, Adkins RH, Herbert P, Schechter C, Smith D, Kemp BJ et al. Is immobilization associated with an abnormal lipoprotein profile? Observations from a diverse cohort. Spinal Cord. 1999; 37: 485-493.
  • Bauman WA, Spungen AM. Disorders of carbohydrate and lipid metabolism in veterans with paraplegia or quadriplegia: A model of premature aging. Metabolism. 1994a; 43: 749-756.
  • Bauman WA, Spungen AM.  Carbohydrate and lipid metabolism in chronic spinal cord injury.  J Spinal Cord Med. 2001a; 24: 266-277.
  • Bauman WA, Spungen AM. Body composition in aging: adverse changes in able-bodied persons and in those with spinal cord injury. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2001b; 6: 22-36.
  • Bauman WA, Spungen AM, Flanagan S, Zhong YG, Alexander LR, Tsitouras PD. Blunted growth hormone response to intravenous arginine in subjects with spinal cord injury. Horm Metab Res. 1994b; 26: 152-156.
  • Bauman WA, Spungen AM, Raza M, Rothstein B, Zhang R, Zhang Y, Tsuruta M, Shahidi R, Pierson RN, Wang J, Gordon SK.  Coronary heart disease, metabolic risk factors and latent disease in individuals with paraplegia.  Mt Sinai J Med. 1992a; 59; 163-168.
  • Bauman WA, Spungen AM, Wang J, Pierson RN Jr. The relationship between energy expenditure and lean tissue in monozygotic twin discordant for spinal cord injury. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2004; 41:1-8.
  • Bauman WA, Spungen AM, Wang J, Pierson RN Jr, Schwartz E. Continuous loss of bone during chronic immobilization: a monozygotic twin study. Osteoporos Int. 1999; 10: 123-127.
  • Bauman WA, Spungen AM, Zhong YG, Mobbs CV.  Plasma leptin is directly related to body adiposity in subjects with spinal cord injury.  Horm Metab Res. 1996; 28: 732-736.
  • Bauman WA, Spungen AM, Zhong YG, Rothstein JL, Petry C, Gordon SK.  Depressed serum high density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in veterans with spinal cord injury.  Paraplegia.  1992b; 30: 697-703.
  • Bauman WA, Zhong YG, Schwartz E. Vitamin D deficiency in veterans with chronic spinal cord injury. Metabolism 1995; 44: 1612-166.
  • Berlowitz DJ, Brown DJ, Campbell DA, Pierce RJ. A longitudinal evaluation of sleep and breathing in the first year after cervical spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005; 86: 1193-1199.
  • Bickford PC, Shukitt-Hale B, Joseph J. Effects of aging on cerebellar noradrenergic function and motor learning: nutritional interventions. Mech Age Dev 1999; 111: 1411-54.
  • Biering-Sorensen F, Biering-Sorensen M. Sleep disturbances in the spinal cord injured: an epidemiological questionnaire investigation, including a normal population. Spinal Cord. 2001; 39: 505-513.
  • Biering-Sorenson F, Bohr H, Schaadt OP. Longitudinal study of bone mineral content in the lumbar spine, the forearm, and the lower extremities after spinal cord injury. Eur J Clin Invest. 1990; 20: 330-335.
  • Bonekat HW, Andersen G, Squires J. Obstructive disorder breathing during sleep in patients with spinal cord injury. Paraplegia. 1990; 28: 392-398.
  • Branch LG, Jette AM. Elders’ use of informal long-term care assistance. Gerontologist. 1983; 23: 51-56.
  • Bravo G, Guizar-Sahagun G, Ibarra A, Centurion D, Villalon CM. Cardiovascular alterations after spinal cord injury: an overview. Curr Med Chem Cardiovasc Hematol Agents. 2004; 2: 133-148.
  • Brenes G, Dearwater S, Shapera R, LaPorte RE, Collins E. High density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations in physically active and sedentary spinal cord injured patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1986; 67: 445-450.
  • Bukov A, Mass I, Lampert T. Social participation in very old age: cross-sectional and longitudinal findings from BASE. Berlin aging study. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2002; 57: 510-517.
  • Burke DC. Pain in paraplegia. Paraplegia. 1973; 10: 297-313.
  • Burns EA, Leventhal EA. Aging, immunity, and cancer. Cancer Control. 2000; 7: 513-522.
  • Bushnik T. Access to equipment, participation, and quality of life in aging individuals with high tetraplegia (C1-C4). Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2002; 7: 17-27.
  • Bushnik T, Charlifue S. Longitudinal study of individuals with high tetraplegia (C1-C4) 14 to 24 years postinjury. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2005; 19: 79-93.
  • Cahan C, Gothe B, Decker MJ, Arnold JL, Strohl KP. Arterial oxygen saturation over time and sleep studies in quadriplegic patients. Paraplegia. 1993; 31:172-179.
  • Campagnolo DI, Bartlett JA, Chatterton R Jr, Keller SE. Adrenal and pituitary hormone patterns after spinal cord injury. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1999; 78: 361-366.
  • Campagnolo DI, Keller Se, DeLisa JA, Glick TJ, Sipski ML, Schleifer SJ.  Alteration of immune system function in tetraplegics.  Am J Phys Med Rehabil.  1994; 73: 387-393.
  • Capoor J, Stein AB. Aging with spinal cord injury. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2005; 16: 129-161.
  • Cardenas DD, Rosenbluth J. At-and below-level pain in spinal cord injury: Mechanisms and diagnosis. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2001; 7: 30-40.
  • Cardus D, McTaggart WG. Body composition in spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1985; 66: 257-259.
  • Castelli WP.  Epidemiology of coronary heart disease: The Framingham study.  Am J Med.  1984; 76: 4 -12.
  • Catz A, Reider-Grosswasser I, Gutman I, Gepstein R, Mendelson L. Lumbar spine dimensions in paraparetic patients: A 10 year follow up study. Paraplegia. 1992; 30; 729-733.
  • Charlifue S. Research into the aging process. In: Whiteneck GG, et al. (eds.). Aging with a Spinal Cord Injury. Demos Publications. New York, NY 1993, pp 9-21.
  • Charlifue S, Gerhart K. Community integration in spinal cord injury of long duration.  NeuroRehab. 2004a. 19: 91-101.
  • Charlifue S, Gerhart K. Changing psychosocial morbidity in people aging with spinal cord injury. NeuroRehab. 2004b; 19: 15-23.
  • Charlifue S, Lammertse D.  Aging in spinal cord injury.  In: Kirshblum S, Campagnolo DI, DeLisa JA, editors.  Spinal Cord Medicine.  Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins.  Philadelphia, 2002.  pp 409-23.
  • Charlifue S, Lammertse DP, Adkins RH. Aging with spinal cord injury: Changes in selected health indices and life satisfaction. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004; 85: 1848-1853.
  • Charlifue SW, Gerhart K, Whiteneck GG. Conceptualizing and quantifying functional change: An examination of aging with spinal cord injury. Top Geriatr Rehabil. 1998; 13: 35-48.
  • Charlifue SW, Weitzenkamp DA, Whiteneck GG. Longitudinal outcomes in spinal cord injury: Aging, secondary conditions, and well-being. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999:1429-1434.
  • Cheville AL, S.C. K. Thyroid hormone changes in chronic spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 1995; 18: 227-232.
  • Chow YW, Inman C, Pollintine P, Sharp CA, Haddawa MJ, El Masry W et al. Ultrasound bone densitometry and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in patients with spinal cord injury: a cross-sectional study. Spinal Cord. 1996;34:736-41.
  • Christensen H, Korten A, Jorm AF, Henderson AS, Scott R, Mackinnon AJ. Activity levels and cognitive functioning in an elderly community sample. Age and Ageing. 1996; 25: 72-80.
  • Claus-Walker J, Halstead LS. Metabolic and endocrine changes in spinal cord injury: III. Less quanta of sensory impact plus bedrest and illness. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1982a; 63: 628-631.
  • Claus-Walker J, Halstead LS. Metabolic and endocrine changes in spinal cord injury: IV. Compounded neurologic dysfunction. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1982b; 63: 632-638.
  • Coll JR, Frankel HL, Charlifue SW, Whiteneck GG. Evaluating neurological group homogeneity in assessing the mortality risk for people with spinal cord injuries. Spinal Cord. 1998; 36: 275-279.
  • Collins KF, Dore C, Exton-Smith AN, Fox RH, MacDonald IC, Woodward PM. Accidental hypothermia and impaired temperature homeostasis in the elderly. Br Med J. 1977; 6: 353-356.
  • Cooney LM. Hip fractures. In: Hazzard, WR, Blass JP, Ettinger Jr. WH (eds.). Principles of geriatric medicine and gerontology. McGraw Hill. New York, NY 1999, 4th Edition, pp 1547-1551.
  • Cosman BC, Stone JM, Perkash I. The gastrointestinal system. In: Whiteneck GG, et al. (eds.). Aging with a Spinal Cord Injury. Demos Publications.  New York, NY 1993 pp. 117-127.
  • Cotton BA, Pryor JP, Chinwalla I, Wiebe DJ, Reilly PM, Schwab CW. Respiratory complications and mortality risk associated with thoracic spine injury. J Trauma. 2005; 59: 400-409.
  • Crewe NM, Krause JS. An eleven-year follow-up of adjustment to spinal cord injury. Rehabil Psychol. 1991; 35: 205-210.
  • Cruse JM, Lewis RE, Dilioglou S, Roe DL, Wallace WF, Chen RS. Review of immune function, healing of pressure ulcers, and nutritional status in patients with spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2000; 23: 129-135.
  • Curtis KA, Drysdale GA, Lanza RD, Kolber M, Vitolo RS, West R. Shoulder pain in wheelchair users with tetraplegia and paraplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999; 80: 453-457.
  • Dalyan M, Cardenas DD, Gerard B. Upper extremity pain after spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 1999; 37: 191-195.
  • Daverat P, Gagnon M, Dartigues JF, Mazaux JM, Barat M. Initial factors predicting survival in patients with a spinal cord injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry.1989; 53: 403-406.
  • Dauty M, Perrouin Verbe B, Maugars Y, Dubois C, Mathe JF. Supralesional and sublesional bone mineral density in spinal cord injuryed patients. Bone. 2000; 27: 305-309.
  • de Bruin E, Dietz V, Dambacher MA, Stussi E. Longitudinal changes in bone in men with spinal cord injury. Clin Rehabil. 2000; 14:145-52.
  • de Bruin E, Vanwanseele B, Dambacher MA, Dietz V, Stussi E. Long-term changes in the tibia and radius bone mineral density following spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2005;43: 96-101.
  • Dearwater S, Laporte R, Robertson R, Benes G, Adams L, Becker D. Activity in spinal cord injured patients: an epidemiological analysis of metabolic parameters. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1986; 18: 541-544.
  • Demirel G, Yilmaz H, Paker N, Onel S. Osteoporosis after spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 1998; 36: 822-825.
  • DeVivo MJ, Black KJ, Stover SL. Causes of death during the first 12 years after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993; 74: 248-254.
  • DeVivo MJ, Ivie CS. Life expectancy of ventilator-dependent persons with spinal cord injuries. Chest. 1995; 108: 226-232.
  • DeVivo MJ, Kartus P, Rutt RD, Stover SL, Fine PR. The influence of age at time of spinal cord injury on rehabilitation outcome. Arch Neurol. 1990; 47; 687-691.
  • DeVivo MJ, Krause JS, Lammertse DP. Recent trends in mortality and causes of death among persons with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999; 80:1411-1419.
  • DeVivo MJ, Stover SL. Long-term survival and causes of death. In: Stover SL, DeLisa JA, Whiteneck GG (eds). Spinal Cord Injury: Clinical Outcomes from the Model Systems. Aspen Publishers: Gaithersburg, MD 1995, pp 289 -316.
  • DeVivo MJ, Stover SL, Black KJ. Prognostic factors for 12-year survival after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992; 73: 156-162.
  • DeWire DD, Owens RS, Anderson GA, Gottlieb MS, Lepor H. A comparison of the urological complications associated with long-term management of quadriplegics with and without chronic indwelling urinary catheters. J Urology. 1992; 147: 1069-1072.
  • Dijkers M. Community integration: Conceptual issues and measurement approaches in rehabilitation research. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 1998; 4: 1-15.
  • Dijkers MP. Correlates of life satisfaction among person with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999; 80: 867-876.
  • Dowler R, Richards JS, Putzke JD, Gordon W, Tate D. Impact of demographic and medical factors on satisfaction with life after spinal cord injury: a normative study. J Spinal Cord Med. 2001; 24: 87-91.
  • Dubeau CE. Benign prostatic hyperplasia. In: Cassel CK, Cohen HJ, Larson EB, Meier DE, Resnick NM, Rubenstein LZ et al., editors. Geriatric medicine. 3rd ed. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1997. pp 557-569.
  • Duckworth WC, Jallepalli P, Solomon SS. Glucose intolerance in spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1983; 64: 107-110.
  • Duckworth WC, Solomon SS, Jallepalli P, Heckemeyer C, Finnern J, Powers A. Glucose intolerance due to insulin resistance in patients with spinal cord injuries. Diabetes. 1980; 29: 906-910.
  • Duke PC, Wade JG, Hickey RF, Larson CP. The effects of age on baroreceptor reflex function in man. Can J Anesthesia. 1976; 23: 111-124.
  • El-Masri WS, Fellows G. Bladder cancer after spinal cord injury. Paraplegia. 1981; 19: 265-270.
  • Eisenberg MG, Saltz CC. Quality of life among aging spinal cord injured persons: Long term rehabilitation outcomes. Paraplegia. 1991; 29: 514-520.
  • Emmanuel AV, Chung EAL, Kamm MA, Middleton F. Relationship between gut-specific autonomic testing and bowel dysfunction in spinal cord injury patients. Spinal Cord. 2009; 47: 623-627.
  • Eser P, Frotzler A, Zehnder Y, Wick L, Knecht H, Denoth J et al. Relationship between the duration of paralysis and bone structure: a pQCT study of spinal cord injured individuals. Bone. 2004; 34: 869-80.
  • Faaborg PM, Christensen P, Finnerup N, Laurberg S, Krogh K. The pattern of colorectal dysfunction changes with time since spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2008; 46: 234-238.
  • Farage MA, Miller KW, Berardesca E, Maibach HI. Clinical implications of aging skin: cutaneous disorders in the elderly.  Am J Clin Dermatol. 2009; 10: 73-86.
  • Fawkes-Kirby TM, Wheeler MA, Anton HA, Miller WC, Townson AF, Weeks CAO. Clinical correlates of fatigue in spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2008; 46: 21-25.
  • Finsen V, Indredavik B, Fougner KJ. Bone mineral and hormone status in paraplegics. Paraplegia. 1992;30:343-7.
  • Foxman B. Epidemiology of urinary tract infections: incidence, morbidity, and economic costs. Am J Med.  2002; 113: 5S-13S.
  • Fozard JL, Vercruyssen M, Reynolds SL, Hancock PA, Quilter RE. Age differences and changes in reaction time: the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging. J Gerontol Psychol Sci. 1994; 49: P179-P89.
  • Frankel HL, Coll JR, Charlifue SW, Whiteneck GG, Gardner BP, Jamous MA, Krishnan KR, Nuseibeh I, Savic G, Sett P. Long-term survival in spinal cord injury: a fifty year investigation. Spinal Cord. 1998; 36: 266-274.
  • Frey-Rindova P, de Bruin ED, Stussi E, Dambacker MA, Dietz V. Bone mineral density in upper and lower extremities during 12 months after spinal cord injury measured by peripheral quantitative computed tomography. Spinal Cord. 2000; 38: 26-32.
  • Frotzler A, Berger M, Knecht H, Eser P. Bone steady-state is established at reduced bone strength after spinal cord injury: A longitudinal study using peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT). Bone 2008; 43: 549-555.
  • Furlan JC, Kattail D, Fehlings M. The impact of co-morbidities on age-related differences in mortality after acute traumatic spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma. 2009; 26: 1707-1017.
  • Furlan JC, Krassioukov AV, Fehlings MG. Hematologic abnormalities within the first week after acute isolated traumatic cervical spinal cord injury: A case-control cohort study. Spine.  2006. 31: 2674-2683.
  • Garland DE, Adkins RH, Rah A, Stewart CA. Bone loss with aging and the impact of SCI. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2001a; 6: 47-60.
  • Garland DE, Adkins RH, Scott M, Singh H, Massih M, Stewart C. Bone loss at the os calcis compared with bone loss at the knee in individuals with spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2004; 27: 207-211.
  • Garland DE, Adkins RH, Stewart CA, Ashford R, Vigil D. Regional osteoporosis in women who have a complete spinal cord injury. J Bone Joint Surg. 2001b; 83A: 1195-1200.
  • Garland DE, Steward CA, Adkins RH, Hu SS, Rosen C, Liotta FJ, Weinstein DA. Osteoporosis after spinal cord injury. J Orthop Res. 1992; 10: 371-378.
  • Garshick E, Kelley A, Cohen SA, Garrison A, Tun CG, Gagnon D, Brown R. A prospective assessment of mortality in chronic spinal cord injury.  Spinal Cord. 2005; 43: 408-416.
  • Gaston-Johansson F, Johansson F, Johansson C. Pain in the elderly: prevalence, attitudes and assessments.  Nurs Home Med. 1996; 4: 325-331.
  • Geisler WO, Jousse AT, Wynne-Jones M, Breithaupt D. Survival in traumatic spinal cord injury.  Paraplegia. 1983; 21: 364-373.
  • Gerhart KA, Bergstrom E, Charlifue SW, Menter RR, Whiteneck GG. Long-term spinal cord injury: Functional changes over time.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993; 74: 1030-1034.
  • Giangregorio LM, Craven BC, Webber CA. Musculoskeletal changes in women with spinal cord injury: A twin study.  J Clin Densit. 2005;8: 347-351.
  • Giangregorio LM, McCartney N. Bone loss and muscle atrophy in spinal cord injury: Epidemiology, fracture prediction, and rehabilitation. J Spinal Cord Med. 2006; 29: 489-500.
  • Goddard D, Kleerekoper M. The epidemiology of osteoporosis. Practical implications for patient care.  Postgrad Med. 1998;104: 54-6, 65, 69-72.
  • Goldbour U, Medalie JH.  High density lipoprotein cholesterol and incidence of coronary heart disease: The Israeli ischemic heart disease study.  Am J Epidemiol. 1979; 109: 296-308.
  • Greenhouse AH. Falls among the elderly. In: Albert ML, Knoefel JE, editors. Clinical neurology of aging. New York: Oxford University Press Inc; 1994. pp 611-626.
  • Groah S, Weitzenkamp D, Lammertse D, Whiteneck GG, Lezotte DC, Hamman RF.  Excess risk of bladder cancer in spinal cord injury: Evidence of an association between indwelling catheter use and bladder cancer.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002; 83: 346-51.
  • Gunnewicht BR. Pressure sores in patients with acute spinal cord injury. J Wound Care.  1995; 4: 452-454.
  • Gupta N, White KT, Sandford PR. Body mass index in spinal cord injury – a retrospective study.  Spinal Cord. 2006; 44: 92-94.
  • Hallin P, Sullivan M, Kreuter M. Spinal cord injury and quality of life measures: a review of instrument psychometric quality.  Spinal Cord. 2001; 38: 509-523.
  • Halter JB. Diabetes mellitus. In: Hazzard WR, Blass JP, Ettinger Jr WH, Halter JB, Ouslander JG (eds). Principles of geriatric medicine and gerontology. McGraw-Hill. New York, NY. 1999: 4th ed, 835-842.
  • Hartkopp A, Bronnum-Hansen H, Seidenschnur AM, Biering-Sorensen F. Survival and cause of death after traumatic spinal cord injury. A long-term epidemiological survey from Denmark. Spinal Cord. 1997; 35: 76-85.
  • Herlofson K, Larsen P. Measuring fatigue in patients with Parkinson’s disease – the fatigue severity scale.  Euro J Neurol. 2002; 9: 595-600.
  • Hoyer WJ, Rybash JM, Roodin PA. Adult development and aging (4th Ed.). McGraw-Hill, Boston, NY; 1999.
  • Huang TS, Wang YH, Chen S. The relation of serum leptin to body mass index and to serum cortisol in men with spinal cord injury.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998; 81:1582-1586.
  • Huang TS, Wang YH, Chiang HS, Lien YN. Pituitary-testicular and pituitary-thyroid axes in spinal cord-injured males.  Metabol. 1993; 42: 516-521.
  • Imai K, Kadowaki T, Aizawa Y. Standardized indices of mortality among persons with spinal cord injury: Accelerated aging process.  Industrial Health. 2004; 42: 213-218.
  • Ingles JI, Eskes GA, Phillips SJ. Fatigue after stroke.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999; 80: 173-178.
  • Janssens JP. Aging of the respiratory system: Impact on pulmonary function tests and adaptation to exertion.  Clin Chest Med.  2005; 26: 469-484.
  • Jensen MP, Hoffman AJ, Cardenas DD. Chronic pain in individuals with spinal cord injury: A survey and longitudinal study.  Spinal Cord. 2005; 43: 704-12.
  • Jones LM, Legge M, Goulding A. Healthy body mass index values often underestimate body fat in men with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003; 84:1068-1071.
  • Jones LM, Legge M, Goulding A. Factor analysis of the metabolic syndrome in spinal cord-injured men.  Metabol. 2004; 53: 1372-1377.
  • Jones ML, Mathewson CS, Adkins VK, Ayllon T. Use of behavioral contingencies to promote prevention of recurrent pressure ulcers.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005; 84: 796-802.
  • Kaplan R, Erickson J. Quality adjusted life expectancy for men and women in the United States. In: Manuc SB (ed.). Behavior, health, and aging. Lawrence Erlbaum. Mawhaw, NJ. 2000.
  • Karlsson AK. Insulin resistance and sympathetic function in high spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 1999; 37: 494-500.
  • Kemp B, Ettelson D. Quality of life while living and aging with a spinal cord injury and other impairments. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2001; 6: 116-127.
  • Kemp BJ, Krause JS. Depression and life satisfaction among people ageing with post-polio and spinal cord injury.  Disabil Rehabil. 1999; 21: 241-249.
  • Kiratli BJ, Smith AE, Nauenberg T, Kallfelz CF, Perkash I. Bone mineral and geometric changes through the femur with immobilization due to spinal cord injury. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2000; 37: 255-263.
  • Kivimäki J, Ahoniemi E. Ultrasonographic findings in shoulders of able-bodied, paraplegic and tetraplegic subjects. Spinal Cord 2008;46:50-2.
  • Kiwerski J, Weiss M, Chrostowska T. Analysis of mortality of patients after cervical spine trauma.  Paraplegia. 1981; 19: 347-351.
  • Kliesch WF, Cruse JN, Lewis RE, Bishop GR, Brackin B, Lampton JA. Restoration of depressed immune function in spinal cord injury patients receiving rehabilitation therapy. Paraplegia. 1996; 34: 82-90.
  • Knox CA. Neuoranatomical changes associated with aging in the peripheral nervous system. In: Albert ML, Knoefel JE, editors. Clinical neurology of aging. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press Inc. 1994. pp 68-78.
  • Konety BR, Nguyen TT, Brenes G, Lewis N, Saul M, Nelson JB et al.  Evaluation of the effect of spinal cord injury on serum PSA levels.  Urol.  2000; 56:82-86.
  • Kraus JF, Franti CE, Borhani NO, Riggins RS. Survival with an acute spinal cord injury. J Chronic Dis. 1979; 32: 269-283.
  • Krause JS. Adjustment after spinal cord injury: A 9-year longitudinal study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997; 78: 651-657.
  • Krause JS. Skin sores after spinal cord injury: relationship to life adjustment.  Spinal Cord. 1998; 36: 51-56.
  • Krause JS. Aging after spinal cord injury: an exploratory study. Spinal Cord. 2000; 38: 77-83.
  • Krause JS. Self-reported problems after spinal cord injury: Implications for rehabilitation practice. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2007; 12: 35-44.
  • Krause JS, Broderick L. A 25-year longitudinal study of the natural course of aging after spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2005; 43: 349-356.
  • Krause JS, Coker JL. Aging after spinal cord injury: A 30-year longitudinal study. J Spinal Cord Med. 2006; 29: 371-376.
  • Krause JS, Crewe NM. Chronologic age, time since injury, and time of measurement: effect on adjustment after spinal cord injury.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1991; 72: 91-100.
  • Krause JS, DeVivo MJ, Jackson AB. Health status, community integration, and economic risk factors for mortality after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil.  2004; 85: 1764-1773.
  • Krause JS, Sternberg M. Aging and adjustment after spinal cord injury: the roles of chronologic age, time since injury, and environmental change.  Rehabil Psychol. 1997; 42: 287-302.
  • Krogh K, Mosdal C, Laurberg S. Gastrointestinal and segmental colonic transit times in patients with acute and chronic spinal cord lesions.  Spinal Cord.  2000; 38: 615-621.
  • Kuhlemeier KV, McEachran AB, Lloyd K, Stover SL, Fine PR.  Serum creatinine as an indicator of renal function after spinal cord injury.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil.  1984a; 65: 694-697.
  • Kuhlemeier KV, McEachran AB, Lloyd K, Stover SL, Tauxe WN, Dubovsky EV et al. Renal function after acute and chronic spinal cord injury. J Urology. 1984b; 131: 439-445.
  • Lal S. Premature degenerative shoulder changes I spinal cord injury patients. Spinal Cord. 1998;36:186-9.
  • Lam T, Wolfe DL, Hsieh JTC, Whittaker M, Eng JJ (2006). Lower Limb Rehabilitation Following Spinal Cord Injury. In: Eng JJ, Teasell RW, Miller WC, Wolfe DL, Townson AF, Aubut J, Abramson C, Hsieh JTC, Connolly S, editors. Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Evidence. Vancouver, p 6.1-6.34.
  • Lamid S. Long-term follow-up of spinal cord injury patients with vesicoureteral reflux. Paraplegia. 1988; 26: 27-34.
  • Lammertse DP. The Nervous System. In: Whiteneck GG, et al. (eds.). Aging with a Spinal Cord Injury. Demos Publications.  New York, NY 1993. pp 129-137.
  • Lammertse, DP. Maintaining health long-term with spinal cord injury. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil.  2001; 6: 1-21.
  • LaPorte RE, Brenes G, Dearwater S, Murphy MA, Cauley JA, Dietrick R, Robertson R. HDL cholesterol across a spectrum of physical activity from quadriplegia to marathon running.  Lancet. 1983; 1: 1212-1213.
  • LaVela SL, Weaver FM, Goldstein B, Chen K, Miskevics S, Rajan S et al. Diabetes mellitus in individuals with spinal cord injury or disorder. J Spinal Cord Med. 2006; 29: 387-395.
  • Lazo MG, Shirazi P, Sam M, Giobbe-Hurder A, Blacconiere MJ, Muppidi M. Osteoporosis and risk of fracture in men with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2001; 39: 208-214.
  • Le CT, Price M. Survival from spinal cord injury. J Chron Dis. 1982; 35: 487-492.
  • Liang H, Chen D, Wang Y, Rimmer JH, Braunschweig CL. Different risk factor patterns for metabolic syndrome in men with spinal cord injury compared with able-bodied men despite similar prevalence rates.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007; 88: 1198-1204.
  • Liang HW, Wang YH, Lin YN, Wang JD, Jang Y. Impact of age on the injury pattern and survival of people with cervical injuries. Spinal Cord. 2001; 39: 375-380.
  • Liem NR, McColl MA, King W, Smith KM. Aging with a spinal cord injury: Factors associated with the need for more help with activities of daily living. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004; 85; 1567-1577.
  • Linn WS, Adkins RH, Gong H, Waters RL. Pulmonary function in chronic spinal cord injury: a cross-sectional survey of 222 southern California adult outpatients.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000; 81:757-763.
  • Loeser RF and Delbono O (1999).  The musculoskeletal and joint system.  In: Hazzard WR, Blass JP, Ettinger WH, Halter JB, Ouslander JG, editors. Principles of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology. New York: McGraw Hill; pp 1097–1111
  • Loveridge B, Sanii R, Dubo HI.  Breathing pattern adjustments during the first year following cervical spinal cord injury. Paraplegia. 1992; 30: 479-488.
  • Lynch NA, Metter EJ, Lindle RS, Fozard JL, Tobin JD, Roy TA et al. Muscle quality. I. Age-associated differences between arm and leg muscle groups. J Appl Physiol. 1999; 86: 188-94.
  • Lynch AC, Wong C, Anthony A, Dobbs BR, Frizelle FA. Bowel dysfunction following spinal cord injury: A description of bowel function in a spinal cord-injured population and comparison with age and gender matched controls.  Spinal Cord. 2000; 38:717-723.
  • Lyons, M. Immune function in spinal cord injured males. J Neurosci Nurs. 1987; 19: 18-23.
  • MacDiarmid SA, Arnold EP, Palmer NB, Anthony A. Management of spinal cord injured patients by indwelling suprapubic catheterization. J Urology. 1995; 154: 492-494.
  • Madersbacher G, Oberwalder M. The elderly para- and tetraplegic: special aspects of the urological care.  Paraplegia. 1987; 4: 318-323.
  • Maki KC, Briones ER, Langbein WE, Inman-Felton A, Nemchausky B, Welch M et al. Associations between serum lipids and adiposity in men with spinal cord injury.  Paraplegia. 1995; 22: 102-109
  • McClain R, Gray ML. Prostate cancer: A primer. Clinical Advisor. 2000; 3: 37-48.
  • McColl MA, Walker J, Stirling P, Wilkins R, Corey P. Expectations of life and health among spinal cord injured adults.  Spinal Cord. 1997; 35: 818-828.
  • McColl MA, Arnold R, Charlifue S, Glass C, Savic G, Frankel H.  Aging, spinal cord injury, and quality of life: structural relationships.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003; 84:1137-1144.
  • McColl MA, Charlifue S, Glass C, Lawson N, Savic G.  Aging, gender, and spinal cord injury.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004; 85: 363-367.
  • McColl MA, Charlifue S, Glass C, Savic G, Meehan M.  International differences in ageing and spinal cord injury.  Spinal Cord. 2002. 40:128-136.
  • Menardo G, Bausano G, Corazziri E, Fazio A, Marangi A, Genta V et al. Large-bowel transit in paraplegic patients.  Dis Col Rect. 1987; 30: 924-8.
  • Miller RA. The aging immune system: Primer and prospectus. Science. 1996; 273: 70-74.
  • Myers J, Lee M, Kiratli J. Cardiovascular disease in spinal cord injury: an overview of prevalence, risk evaluation, and management.  Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2007; 86: 142-152.
  • Nash MS. Immune responses to nervous system decentralization and exercise in quadriplegia.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1994; 26: 164-171.
  • National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 2006, Annual Statistical Report, July 2006.
  • National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 2008, Facts and Figures at a Glance, January 2008.
  • Nichols PJR, Norman PA, Ennis JR. Wheelchair user’s shoulder. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1979; 11: 29-32.
  • Nuhlicek DN, Spurr GB, Barboriak JJ, Rooney CB, El Ghatit EL, Bongrard RD. Body composition of patients with spinal cord injury. Euro J Clin Nut. 1988; 42:765-773.
  • Orakzai SH, Orakzai RH, Ahmadi N, Agrawal N, Bauman WA, Yee F et al. Measurement of coronary artery calcification by electron beam computerized tomography in persons with chronic spinal cord injury: evidence for increased atherosclerotic burden. Spinal Cord. 2007; 45: 775-9.
  • Pannek J, Berges RR, Cubick G, Meindl R, Senge T. Prostate size and PSA serum levels in male patients with spinal cord injury. Urol.  2003; 62: 845-848.
  • Park YH, Taylor JA, Szollar SM, Resnick D. Imaging findings in spinal neuroarthropathy. Spine. 1994; 19: 1499-1504.
  • Pathy M. The central nervous system: Clinical presentation and management of neurologic disorders in old age. In: Brockelhurst JC, editor. Textbook of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Churchill-Livingstone; 1985.
  • Pentland W, McColl MA, Rosenthal C. The effect of aging and duration of disability on long term health outcomes following spinal cord injury.  Paraplegia. 1995; 33: 367-373.
  • Pentland W, Twomey LT. The weight-bearing upper extremity in women with long-term paraplegia.  Paraplegia. 1991; 29: 521-530.
  • Pentland WE, Twomey LT. Upper limb function in persons with long term paraplegia and implications for independence: Part I. Paraplegia. 1994; 32: 211-218.
  • Petrofsky JS, Laymon M. The effect of ageing in spinal cord injured humans on the blood pressure and heart rate responses during fatiguing isometric exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2002; 86: 479-486.
  • Pierce CA, Richards JS, Gordon W, Tate D. Life satisfaction following spinal cord injury and the WHO model of functioning and disability. Spinal Cord Injury Psychosoc Process. 1999; 12: 124-127.
  • Poluri A, Mores J, Findley T, Cristian A.  Fatigue in the elderly population. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am.  2005; 16; 91-108
  • Pottenger LA. Orthopedic problems. In: Cassel CK, Cohen HJ, Larson EB, Meier DE, Resnick NM, Rubenstein LZ, Sorenson LB (eds.). Geriatric medicine. Spinger-Verlag; New York, NY: 1997: 3rd ed., pp. 443-448.
  • Pramudji CK, Mtuchnik SE, DeConcini D, Boone TB. Prostate cancer screening with prostate specific antigen in spinal cord injured men.  J Urol. 2002; 167: 1303-1305.
  • Prusmack C, Rochman AS, Levi AD. The effect of age on survival following traumatic spinal cord injury. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 2006; 49-77.
  • Putzke JD, Richards JS, Dowler RN. The impact of pain in spinal cord injury.  J Spinal Cord Med. 2000; 45: 386-401.
  • Putzke JD, Richards JS, Hicken BL, DeVivo MJ. Interference due to pain following spinal cord injury: important predictors and impact on quality of life.  Pain. 2002a; 100: 231-242.
  • Putzke JD, Richards JS, Hicken BL, DeVivo MJ. Predictors of life satisfaction: a spinal cord injury cohort study.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002b; 83: 555–561.
  • Rabin BS.  Changes in the immune system during aging. In: Manuck SB, Jennings R, Rabin BS, Baum A (eds.). Behavior, health, and aging. Lawrence Erlbaum: Mahwah, NJ: 2000: pp. 59-68.
  • Ragnarsson KT, Sell GH. Lower extremity fractures after spinal cord injury: a retrospective study.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1981; 62: 418-423.
  • Richards JS, Bombardier CH, Tate D, Dijkers M, Gordon W, Shewchuk R et al. Access to the environment and life satisfaction after spinal cord injury.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999; 80: 1501-1506.
  • Rintala DH, Hart KA, Priebe MM. Predicting consistency of pain over a 10-year period in persons with spinal cord injury.  J Rehab Res Dev. 2004; 41: 75-88.
  • Rintala DH, Loubser PG, Castro J, Hart KA, Fuhrer MJ. Chronic pain in a community-based sample of men with spinal cord injury: Prevalence, severity, and relationship with impairment, disability, handicap, and subjective well-being. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998; 79: 604-614.
  • Rodriguez GP, Claus-Walker J. . J Chroma. 1984; 308: 65-73.
  • Rodriguez GP, Garber SL. Prospective study of pressure ulcer risk in spinal cord injury patients.  Paraplegia. 1994; 32:150-158.
  • Rossier AB, Favre H, Valloton MB. Body composition and endocrine profile in spinal cord injured patients. In: Lee B, Ostrander E, George J, Cochran B, Shaw WW (eds.). The spinal cord injured patient. Comprehensive management. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1991:163-170.
  • Roth GS, Joseph JA. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of impaired dopaminergic function during aging.  Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1994; 719: 129-135.
  • Roy RTM. A survey of chronic pain in an elderly population. Can Fam Physician. 1986; 32: 513-516.
  • Sabo D, Blaich S, Wenz W, Hohmann M, Loew M, Gerner HJ. Osteoporosis in patients with paralysis after spinal cord injury. A cross sectional study in 46 male patients with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Arch Ortho Trauma Surg. 2001; 121: 75-78.
  • Saladin LK, Krause JS. Pressure ulcer prevalence and barriers to treatment after spinal cord injury: Comparisons of four groups based on race-ethnicity. NeuroRehabil. 2009; 24: 57-66.
  • Samsa GP, Patrick CH, Feussner JR. Long-term survival of veterans with traumatic spinal cord injury.  Arch Neurol. 1993; 50: 909-914.
  • Scadding J. Neuropathic pain. Adv Clin Neurosci Rehabil. 2003; 3: 8-14.
  • Schilero GJ, Spungen AM, Bauman WA, Radulovic M, Lesser M. Pulmonary function and spinal cord injury. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2009; 166:129-141.
  • Schwartz C, Sprangers M. Adaptation to changing health: Response shift in quality-of-life research. Washington DC: American Psychological Association; 2000.
  • Schwartz CE, Andresen EM, Nosek MA, Krahn GL, and the RRTC Expert Panel on Health Status             Management. Response shift theory: important implications for measuring quality of life in           people with disability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil.  2007; 88:529-536
  • Scivoletto G, Morganti B, Ditunno P, Ditunno JF, Molinari M. Effects on age on spinal cord lesion patients' rehabilitation. Spinal Cord. 2004; 41: 457-464.
  • Scott Sr PA, Perkash I, Mode D, Wolfe VA, Terris MK. Prostate cancer diagnosed in spinal cord-injured patients is more commonly advanced stage than in able-bodied patients. J Urol. 2004; 63: 509-512.
  • Sekar P, Wallace DD, Waites KB, DeVivo MJ, Lloyd LK, Stover SL et al. Comparison of long-term renal function after spinal cord injury using different urinary management methods. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997; 78: 992-997.
  • Shetty K, Sutton CH, Mattson DE, et al. Hyposomatomedinemia in quadriplegic men.  Am J Med Sci. 1993; 305: 95-100.
  • Shim HB, Kim YD, Jung TY, Lee JK, Ku JH. Prostate-specific antigen and prostate volume in Korean men with spinal cord injury: A case-control study. Spinal Cord. 2008; 46: 11-5.
  • Shizgal HM, Roza A, Leduc B, Drouin G, Villemure JG, Yaffe C. Body composition in quadriplegic patients. J Parenteral Enteral Nutr. 1986; 10: 364-368.
  • Siddall PJ, McClelland JM, Rutkowski SB, Cousins MJ. A longitudinal study of the prevalence and characteristics of pain in the first 5 years following spinal cord injury. Pain. 2003; 103:249-57.
  • Siddall PJ, Taylor DA, McClelland JM, Rutkowski SB, Cousins MJ. Pain report and the relationship of pain to physical factors in the first 6 months following spinal cord injury. Pain. 1999; 81: 187-197.
  • Sie IH, Waters RL, Adkins RH, Gellman H. Upper extremity pain in the post-rehabilitation spinal cord injured patient. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992; 73: 44-48.
  • Slade JM, Bickel CS, Modlesky CM, Majumdar S, Dudley GA. Trabecular bone is more deteriorated in spinal cord injured versus estrogen-free menopausal women. Osteoporos Int. 2005; 16: 263-272.
  • Sneddon DG, Bedbrook G. Survival following traumatic tetraplegia. Paraplegia. 1982; 20: 201-207.
  • Sobel JW, Bohlman HH, Freehafer AA. Charcot's arthropathy of the spine following spinal cord injury. A report of five cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985; 67: 771–776.
  • Soden RJ, Walsh J, Middleton JW, Craven ML, Rutkowski SB, Yeo JD. Causes of death after spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2000; 38: 604-610.
  • Stonehill WH, Dmochowski RR, Patterson AL, Cox CE. Risk factors for bladder tumours in spinal cord injury patients. J Urol. 1996; 155: 1248-1250.
  • Spungen AM, Wang J, Pierson Jr RN, Bauman WA. Soft tissue body composition differences in monozygotic twins discordant for spinal cord injury. J Appl Physiol. 2000; 88: 1310-1315.
  • Strauss DJ, DeVivo MJ, Paculdo DR, Shavelle RM. Trends in life expectancy after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006; 87: 1079-1085.
  • Strauss D, DeVivo MJ, Shavelle R. Long-term mortality risk after spinal cord injury. J Insur Med.  2000; 32:11-16.
  • Stormer S, Gerner HJ, Gruninger W, Metzmacher K, Follinger S, Wienke C, Aldinger W, Walker N, Zimmermann M, Paeslack V. Chronic pain/dysaesthesiae in spinal cord injury patients: results of a multicentre study. Spinal Cord. 1997; 35: 446-455.
  • Subbarao JV, Klopfstein J, Turpin R. Prevalence and impact of wrist and shoulder pain in patients with spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 1995; 18: 9-13.
  • Szollar SM, Martin EME, Parthemore JG, Sartoris DJ, Deftos LJ. Densitometric patterns of spinal cord injury associated bone loss. Spinal Cord. 1997a; 35: 374-382.
  • Szollar SM, Martin EME, Parthemore JG, Sartoris DJ, Deftos LJ. Demineralization in tetraplegic and paraplegic man over time. Spinal Cord. 1997b; 35: 325-228.
  • Szollar SM, Martin EME, Sartoris DJ, Parthemore JG, Deftos LJ. Bone mineral density and indexes of bone metabolism in spinal cord injury. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1998; 77: 28-35.
  • Tate D, Kalpakjian CZ, Forchheimer MB. Quality of life issues in individuals with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002; 83: S18-S25.
  • Tax AAM, Van der Gon JJD, Gielen CCAM, Kleyne M. Differences in central control of m. biceps brachii in movement tasks and force tasks. Exp Brain Res. 1990; 79: 138-142.
  • Tenover JL. Trophic factors and male hormone replacement. In: Hazzard WR, Blass JP, Ettinger Jr WH, Halter JB, Ouslander JG (eds). Principles of geriatric medicine and gerontology. McGraw-Hill. New York, NY 1999: 4th ed, 1029-1040.
  • Thompson L. Functional changes in persons with aging with spinal cord injury. Assist Technol.  1999; 11: 123-129.
  • Thompson L, Yakura J. Aging related functional changes in persons with spinal cord injury. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2006; 6: 69-82.
  • Tonack M, Hitzig SL, Craven BC, Campbell KA, Boschen KA, McGillivray CF. Predicting life satisfaction after spinal cord injury in a Canadian sample. Spinal Cord. 2008; 46: 380-385.
  • Trieschmann R. Aging with disability. New York: Demos, 1987.
  • Tsitouras PD, Zhong YG, Spungen AM, Bauman WA. Serum testosterone and growth hormone/insulin-like growth factor-I in adults with spinal cord injury. Horm Metab Res. 1995; 27: 287-292.
  • Vogel LC, Krajci KA, Anerson CJ. Adults with pediatric-onset spinal cord injury: Part 2: Musculoskeletal and neurological complications. J Spinal Cord Med. 2002; 25: 117-123.
  • Vaziri ND, Eltorai I, Gonzales E, Winer R, Pham H, Bui TD et al. Pressure ulcer, fibronectin, and related proteins in spinal cord injured patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992; 73: 803-806.
  • Vaziri ND, Pandian MR, Segal JL, Winer RL, Eltorai I, Burnnemann BS. Vitamin D, Parathormone and Calcitonin Profiles in persons with long-standing spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994; 75: 766-769.
  • Verdú E, Ceballos D, Vilches J, Navarro X. Influence of aging on peripheral nerve function and regeneration J Peripher Nerv Syst 2000; 5: 191-208.
  • Viera A, Merritt JL, Erickson RP. Renal function in spinal cord injury: A preliminary report. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1986; 67: 257-259.
  • Vlychou M, Papadaki PJ, Zavras GM, Vasio K, Kelekis N, Malizos KN et al. Paraplegia-related alterations of bone density in forearm and hip in Greek patients after spinal cord injury. Dis Rehabil. 2003; 25: 324-30.
  • Wang YH, Huang TS, Lien IN. Hormone changes in men with spinal cord injuries. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1992; 71: 328-332.
  • Wang TD, Wang YH, Hung TS, Su TC, Pan SL, Chen SY. Circulating levels of markers of inflammation and endothelial activation are increased in men with chronic spinal cord injury. J Formos Med Assoc. 2007;106: 919-928.
  • Waters RL, Sie IH, Adkins RH.  The musculoskeletal system.  In: Whiteneck GG, et al. (eds.).  Aging with a Spinal Cord Injury.  Demos Publications.  New York, NY 1993, pp 53-71.
  • Waters RL, Sie IH. Upper extremity changes with SCI contrasted to common aging in the musculoskeletal system. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2001; 6: 61-68.
  • Waters RL, Sie IH, Adkins RH. The musculoskeletal system. In: Whiteneck GG, et al. (eds.).  Aging with a Spinal Cord Injury. Demos Publications. New York, NY 1993, pp 53-71.
  • West DA, Cummings JM, Longo WE, Virgo KS, Johnson FE, Parra RO. Role of chronic catheterization in the development of bladder cancer in patients with spinal cord injury.  Urology. 1999; 53: 292-297.
  • Westgren N, Levi R. Quality of life and traumatic spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998; 79: 1433-1439.
  • Whiteneck GG, Charlifue SW, Frankel HL, Fraser MH, Gardner BP, Gerhart KA.  Mortality, morbidity and psychosocial outcomes of persons spinal cord injured more than 20 years ago.  Paraplegia. 1992; 30: 617-630.
  • Whiteneck GG, Charlifue SW, Gerhart KA, Lammertse DP, Manley S, Menter RR et al., editors. Aging with Spinal Cord Injury. New York: Demos Publications; 1993.
  • Wicks AB, Menter RR. Long-term outlook in quadriplegic patients with initial ventilator dependency. Chest. 1986; 90: 406-410.
  • Wilmet E, Ismail AA, Heilpron A, Welraeds D, Bergmann P. Longitudinal study of the bone mineral content and of soft tissue composition after spinal cord section. Paraplegia. 1995; 33: 674-677.
  • Wilmot CB, Hall KM. The respiratory system. In: Whiteneck GG, Charlifue SW, Gerhart KA, al., editors. Aging with Spinal Cord Injury. Demos Publications. New York, NY 1993, pp 93-104.
  • Wilson JAP, Rogers EL. Gastroenterologic disorders. In: Cassel CK, Cohen HJ, Larson EB, Meier DE, Resnick NM, Rubenstein LZ et al., editors. Geriatric medicine. 3rd ed. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1997. pp 637-52.
  • World Health Organization (WHO). The ten leading causes of death by broad income group Fact Sheet 2007; 310. Retrieved from: http://www.who.int/entity/mediacentre/factsheets/fs310.pdf.
  • Yamamoto M, Tajima F, Okawa H, Mizushima T, Umezu Y, Ogata H. Static exercise-induced increase in blood pressure in individuals with cervical spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil.  1999; 80: 288-293.
  • Yasui NY, Berven NL.  Community integration: conceptualization and measurement.  Disabil Rehabil.  2008; 31: 761–771.
  • Yekutiel M, Brooks ME, Ohry A, Yarom J, Carel R. The prevalence of hypertension, ischemic heart disease and diabetes in traumatic spinal cord injured patients and amputees.  Paraplegia. 1989; 2: 58-62.
  • Yeo JD, Walsh J, Rutkowski SB, Craven M, Middleton J. Mortality following spinal cord injury.  Spinal Cord. 1998; 36: 329-336.
  • Zarb G, Oliver M, Silver J. Ageing with a spinal cord injury: The right to a supportive environment? London: Thames Polytechnic/Spinal Injuries Association, 1990.
  • Zeilig G, Dolev M, Weingarden H, Blumen N, Shemesh Y, Ohry A. Long-term morbidity and mortality after spinal cord injury: 50 years of follow-up. Spinal Cord. 2000; 38: 563-566.

Autonomic Dysreflexia

Introduction

Autonomic dysreflexia (AD) is a clinical emergency in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI).  It commonly occurs in individuals with injury at level T6 and above (Mathias & Frankel 1988; Teasell et al. 2000; Mathias & Frankel 2002).  An episode of AD is usually characterized by acute elevation of arterial blood pressure (BP) and bradycardia (slow heart rate), which, on occasion, may be replaced by tachycardia (rapid heart rate).  Objectively, an increase in systolic BP greater than 20–30mmHg is considered a dysreflexic episode (Teasell et al. 2000). Individuals with cervical and high thoracic SCI have resting arterial BPs that are approximately 15 to 20 mmHg lower than able-bodied individuals (Mathias & Bannister 2002; Claydon et al. 2006). As such, acute elevation of BP to normal or slightly elevated ranges could indicate AD in this population. Intensity of AD can vary from asymptomatic (Linsenmeyer et al. 1996), mild discomfort and headache to a life threatening emergency when systolic blood pressure can reach 300mmHg (Mathias & Frankel 2002).  Untreated episodes of autonomic dysreflexia may have serious consequences, including intracranial hemorrhage, retinal detachments, seizures and death (Yarkony et al. 1986; Pine et al. 1991; Eltorai et al. 1992; Valles et al. 2005). 

It has been observed that the higher the level of the SCI, the greater the degree of clinical manifestations of cardiovascular dysfunctions (Mathias & Frankel 1992; Curt et al. 1997; Krassioukov et al. 2003). Another crucial factor affecting the severity of AD is completeness of spinal injury as only 27% of incomplete tetraplegics presented signs of AD compared to 91% of tetraplegics with complete lesions (Curt et al. 1997).  AD is three times more prevalent in tetraplegics with a complete injury, in comparison to those with an incomplete injury (Curt et al. 1997).  It is important to note, however, that although autonomic dysreflexia occurs more often in the chronic stage of spinal cord injury at or above the 6th thoracic segment, there is clinical evidence of early episodes of autonomic dysreflexia within the first days and weeks after the injury (Silver 2000; Krassioukov et al. 2003).

Krassioukov A, Warburton DER, Teasell RW, Eng JJ (2010). Autonomic Dysreflexia Following Spinal Cord Injury. In: Eng JJ, Teasell RW, Miller WC, Wolfe DL, Townson AF, Hsieh JTC, Connolly SJ, Mehta S, Sakakibara BM, editors. Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Evidence. Version 3.0. Vancouver: p 1-33.

Pathophysiology of AD

AD is most commonly triggered by urinary bladder or colon irritation.  However, many other causes were reported in the literature (Teasell et al. 2000; Mathias & Frankel 2002).  AD is caused by massive sympathetic discharge triggered by either noxious or non-noxious stimuli below the level of the SCI (Krassioukov & Claydon, 2005).  Numerous reports of AD have been described in the literature: episodes are usually short-lived either due to treatment or being self-limiting.  However, there are reports of AD triggered by a specific stimulus, which then continued to be present for a period of days to weeks (Elliott & Krassioukov 2006). 

Numerous mechanisms have been proposed for the development of AD.  It is known from animal studies that autonomic instability following SCI results from plastic changes occurring within the spinal and peripheral autonomic circuits in both the acute and chronic stages following injury (Mathias & Frankel 1988; Teasell et al. 2000; Mathias & Frankel 2002; Krassioukov 2005).  The destruction of the descending vasomotor pathways results in the loss of inhibitory and excitatory supraspinal input to the sympathetic preganglionic neurons; this is currently considered the major contributor to unstable blood pressure control following SCI (Furlan et al. 2003).  Furthermore, there is numerous animal and human data suggesting that plastic changes within the spinal cord (specifically spinal sympathetic neurons and primary afferents) underlies the abnormal cardiovascular control and AD following SCI.  Altered sensitivity of peripheral alphaadrenergic receptors (receptors in the sympathetic nervous system) is one mechanism that may contribute to AD (Osborn et al. 1990; Arnold et al. 1995; Krassioukov & Weaver 1995, 1996; Karlsson 1999; Krassioukov et al. 1999; Krassioukov et al. 2002). 

Table 1: Signs and Symptoms

  • severe headache
  • feeling of anxiety
  • profuse sweating above the level of injury
  • flushing and piloerection (body hair “stands on end”) above the injury
  • dry and pale skin due to vasoconstriction below the level of injury
  • blurred vision
  • nasal congestion
  • cardiac arrhythmias, atrial fibrillation

Management

Presently there is a well established protocol of management of AD developed by the Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine (Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine 1997).  In patients with spinal cord injury, appropriate bladder and bowel routines, in addition to pressure sore prevention are the most effective measures for prevention of autonomic dysreflexia. However, for each individual, the identification and elimination of specific triggers for autonomic dysreflexia should also be employed to manage and prevent episodes of autonomic dysreflexia (Teasell et al. 2000; Mathias & Frankel 2002; Blackmer 2003).

When AD develops, the initial management of an episode involves placing the patient in an upright position to take advantage of an orthostatic reduction in blood pressure, and the loosening of any tight clothing (Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine 1997). Throughout the episode, the blood pressure should be checked at 5 min intervals.  It is then necessary to search for and eliminate the precipitating stimulus most commonly (in 85% of cases) related to either bladder distention or bowel impaction (Teasell et al. 2000; Mathias & Frankel 2002).  The use of antihypertensive drugs should be considered as a last resort, but may be necessary if the blood pressure remains at 150 mmHg or greater following the steps outlined above (Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine 1997).   The goal of such an intervention is to alleviate symptoms and avoidthe complications associated with uncontrolled hypertension (Yarkony et al. 1986; Pine et al. 1991; Eltorai et al. 1992; Valles et al. 2005).

  • The identification of the possible trigger and decrease of afferent stimulation to the spinal cord is the most effective prevention strategy in clinical practice.

Prevention Strategies

The most effective approach to AD is the prevention of occurrence of this disabling and life threatening condition (Braddom & Rocco 1991).  This includes careful evaluation of individuals with SCI and early recognition of possible triggers that could result in AD.  Improved clinician awareness of AD and greater attention on the need to eliminate noxious stimuli in individuals with SCI is a priority.  Clinicians, family members, and care givers should be aware that increased afferent stimulation (e.g., via surgery, invasive investigational procedures, labour) to persons with SCI will increase the risk for development of AD.  A variety of procedures can be used to prevent occurrence of episodes of AD.

Prevention of AD during Bladder Procedures

Urinary bladder irritation or stimulation is the major trigger of AD following SCI (McGuire & Kumar, 1986; Linsenmeyer et al. 1996; Giannantoni et al. 1998; Teasell et al. 2000; Mathias & Frankel 2002).  A bladder management program and continuous urological follow-up are important elements of the medical care of individuals with SCI (Waites et al. 1993a; Vaidyanathan et al. 1994; Vaidyanathan et al. 2004).  An established bladder management program with intermittent catheterization or an indwelling Foley catheter allows individuals with SCI to plan for bladder emptying when convenient or necessary (Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine 2006).  However, there are no studies which specifically assess the effect of bladder management programs on occurrence of autonomic dysreflexia. 

During the last decade, urological follow-up including annual urodynamic evaluations and cystoscopy (depending on the bladder management program), have decreased the frequency of urinary tract infections and development of renal failure in individuals with SCI (Waites et al. 1993a; Waites et al. 1993b; DeVivo et al. 1999).  However, conservative management is not always successful and alternative strategies (e.g. application of Botulinum toxin, capsaicin, anticholinergics, sacral denervation and bladder and urethral sphincter surgery) are needed to decrease afferent stimulation from the urinary bladder to prevent development of AD. In addition, urodynamic procedures and cystoscopy are associated with significant activation of the urinary bladder afferents and have potential to trigger AD (Linsenmeyer et al. 1996; Dykstra et al. 1987; Snow et al. 1978; Chancellor et al. 1993) and thus also require strategies to reduce afferent stimulation during those procedures.

Botulinum Toxin and AD

Injection of Botulinum toxin into the detrusor muscle is an effective method for treating urinary incontinence secondary to neurogenic detrusor overactivity.

Table 2: Botulinum Toxin and AD

Discussion

Four pre-post studies (n=84)(Dykstra et al. 1988; Schurch et al. 2000; Chen et al. 2008; Kuo et al 2008) found the injection of Botulinum toxin into the detrusor muscle or bladder sphincter to be an effective method for treating urinary incontinence secondary to neurogenic detrusor overactivity and bladder sphincter dyssynergia.  In these conditions, injections of the Botulinum toxin either allowed increased urinary bladder capacity (i.e., reduced overactivity of the bladder) or facilitated improved evacuation of urine (reduced bladder sphincter dyssynergia). The duration of effect was reported to last up to 9 months (Schurch et al. 2000).  All studies were level 4 and showed positive effects. In fact, following treatment with Botulinum toxin, 3 individuals reported fewer episodes of AD (Kuo et al. 2008), 4 individuals reported decreased frequency and intensity of AD (Chen et al. 2008) and 3 individuals who experienced severe AD during bladder emptying reported disappearance of these symptoms altogether (Schurch et al. 2000).

Conclusion

  • There is level 4 evidence (from 4 pre-post studies) (Dykstra et al. 1988; Schurch et al. 2000; Chen et al. 2008; Kuo et al. 2008) that Botulinum toxin injections into the detrusor seem to be a safe and valuable therapeutic option in SCI patients who perform clean intermittent self-catheterization and have incontinence resistant to anticholinergic medications.
  • Botulinum toxin injections into the detrusor seem to be a safe and valuable therapeutic option in SCI patients who perform clean intermittent self-catheterization and have incontinence resistant to anticholinergic medications.

Intravesical Capsaicin for the Prevention of AD Resulting from Bladder Sphincter Dyssynergia

Capsaicin is the pungent extract from red pepper and exerts a selective action on certain sensory nerves, most notably those involved in reflex contractions of the bladder after spinal cord injury.

Table 3:  Capsaicin

Discussion

One RCT (n=23)(Giannantoni et al. 2002) and one pre-post study (n=7)(Igawa et al. 2003) evaluated the effect of capsaicin.  Capsaicin exerts a selective action on those sensory nerves involved in reflex contractions of the bladder after SCI. In their pre-post study, Igawa et al. demonstrated that intravesical capsaicin decreased episodes of AD in patients with SCI during catheterization, thereby suggesting the therapeutic potential of intravesical capsaicin for both AD and detrusor hyperreflexia in SCI patients (Igawa et al. 2003).   Giannantoni et al.’s high quality RCT (PEDro=6) used an analogue of capsaicin (resiniferatoxin RXT) which is more than 1,000 times more potent in desensitizing C-fiber bladder afferents and found reduced episodes of AD (Giannantoni et al. 2002).  In addition, investigators found that intravesical administration of resiniferatoxin was superior to that of intravesical capsaicin in terms of urodynamic results and clinical benefits in SCI patients within 60 days of treatment and did not cause the inflammatory side effects associated with capsaicin. Long-term effects of capsaicin or resiniferatoxin on AD, however, have not been evaluated. 

Conclusion

  • There is level 4 evidence (from 1 pre-post study) (Igawa et el. 2003) that intravesical capsaicin is effective for reducing episodes of AD in SCI.
  • There is level 1 evidence (from 2 RCTs) (Kim et al. 2003; Giannantoni et al. 2002) that intravesical resiniferatoxin is effective for reducing episodes of AD in patients with SCI.
  • There is level 1 evidence (from 1 RCT) (Giannantoni et al. 2002) that intravesical resiniferatoxin is more effective than intravesical capsaicin.
  • Capsaicin and its analogue, resiniferatoxin, are effective in the management of AD in patients with SCI.

Anticholinergics

Anticholinergics are a class of medications that inhibit the binding of the neurotransmitter acetylcholine to its receptors.  Acetylcholine is released by the parasympathetic nerve fibers innervating the urinary bladder and contributes to detrusor contraction and activation of the bladder afferent.  These afferent stimuli activate spinal sympathetic circuits that trigger AD.  Anticholinergic agents may therefore, possibly decrease afferent activations, and consequently AD.  However, only one study, employing an observational cross-sectional design (n=48), has examined the use of anticholinergics (Giannantoni et al. 1998).  Giannantoni et al. (1998) did not observe a correlation between anticholinergic drugs and reduced incidence of AD, unless it resulted in detrusor areflexia.  

Table 4:  Anticholinergics

Conclusion

  • There is level 5 evidence that anticholinergics (from 1 observational study) (Giannantoni et al. 1998) are not associated with reduced incidence of AD episodes.
  • Anticholinergics do not appear to be sufficient for the management of AD in SCI.

Sacral Denervation

When detrusor hyperreflexia post-SCI does not respond to conservative treatment, and patients are not eligible for ventral sacral root stimulation for electrically induced micturition, sacral bladder denervation may be considered as a stand-alone procedure to treat urinary incontinence and AD.  Three level 4 studies (aggregate n=459) (Schurch et al. 1998; Hohenfellner et al. 2001; Kutzenberger 2007) with sacral denervation have reported conflicting results in response to this procedure.  Hohenfellner et al. reported that sacral bladder denervation is a valuable treatment option for eliminating detrusor hyperreflexia and AD in all 9 of their subjects (Hohenfellner et al. 2001).  However, in Schurch et al.’s 10 subjects, it was shown that complete bladder deafferentation does not abolish AD during bladder urodynamic investigations. In a review of 440 patients, Kutzenberger saw sacral deafferentation eliminate AD in 438.

Table 5: Sacral Denervation

Conclusion

  • Sacral deafferentation may reduce AD during urodynamic investigations.

Bladder and Urethral Sphincter Surgery

The association between episodes of AD and the presence of detrusor sphincter dyssynergia, high intravesical pressure and urethral pressure has led to the development of surgical procedures to alleviate voiding dysfunctions and consequently AD.  Three surgical studies (Barton et al. 1986; Sidi et al. 1990; Perkash 2007) included indicators of AD (e.g., blood pressure changes).  An older study by Barton et al.(1986) demonstrated reduced AD with an external sphincterotomy. A recent long-term follow-up of patients treated with transurethral sphincterotomies showed the procedure provides subjective relief of AD and is correlated with a significant decrease in blood pressure (Perkash 2007). In addition, post-void residual urine decreased significantly after surgery (Perkash 2007). However, such procedures are now rarely performed as they are associated with significant risks, including hemorrhage, erectile dysfunction(Ahmed et al. 2006) and the need for repeat procedures (Secrest et al. 2003). Thus, alternatives including intraurethral stents and Botulinum toxin injections have been investigated, both showing some success (Ahmed et al. 2006; Seoane-Rodriguez et al. 2007).  The augmentation enterocystoplasty has demonstrated long-term success based on urodynamic evaluation and has been found to reduce symptoms of AD (Sidi et al. 1990).  Enterocystoplasty with a Mitrofanoff Procedure has become a more frequent choice of bladder augmentation in individuals with SCI, due to more favorable long-term outcomes. 

Table 6:  Bladder and Urethral Sphincter Surgery

Conclusions

  • There is level 4 evidence (based on three pre-post/case series studies) (Barton et al. 1986; Sidi et al. 1990; Perkash 2007) that urinary bladder surgical augmentations may result in a decrease of intravesical and urethral pressure and diminish or resolve episodes of AD.
  • There is level 4 evidence (based on 1 case series) (Seoane-Rodriguez et al. 2007) that an intraurethral stent may be an effective means for the long-term management of detrusor-sphincter dysynergia for SCI patients, including those who have previously underwent sphincterotomy.
  • Urinary bladder surgical augmentations may diminish or resolve episodes of AD.
  • An intraurethral stent may be an effective alternative to sphincterotomy in reducing episodes of AD.

Treatments to Reduce AD during Anorectal Procedures

The second most common cause of AD is pain or irritation within the colorectal area. Constipation, hemorrhoids, and anal fissures, all frequently observed in patients with SCI, contribute to episodes of AD (Teasell et al. 2000; McGuire & Kumar 1986; Hawkins et al. 1994; Teichman et al. 1998). Digital stimulation, a common component of bowel routines in individuals with SCI, can also trigger AD (Furusawa et al. 2007).  In addition, rectosigmoid distension and anal manipulation are common iatrogenic triggers of AD (Cosman & Vu 2005).

Table 7:  Treatments to Reduce AD during Anorectal Procedures

Discussion

In two small RCTs (n=70) (Cosman & Vu 2005; Cosman et al. 2002), investigators compared the effect of topical with local anesthesia of the anorectal area for the prevention of AD during anorectal procedures.  They found that anoscopy, which involves stretching the anal sphincters, was a more potent stimulus for AD than flexible sigmoidoscopy, which involves gaseous distention of the rectosigmoid.  In one randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, AD was not abolished by topical lidocaine in the rectum during the anorectal procedure (Cosman et al. 2002).  However, the same investigators in a later RCT demonstrated that intersphincteric anal block with lidocaine was effective in limiting anorectal procedure-associated AD (Cosman & Vu 2005). In one small RCT (n=25) (Furusawa et al. 2009) investigators found that topical lidocaine applied to the rectum prior to digital bowel stimulation significantly reduced systolic blood pressure and reports of AD over the duration of the bowel program when compared to the control group.

Conclusion

  • There is level 1 evidence (from 1 RCT) (Cosman & Vu 2005) that lidocaine anal block significantly limits the AD response in susceptible patients undergoing anorectal procedures.
  • There is level 1 evidence (from 1 RCT) (Cosman et al. 2002) that topical lidocaine does not limit or prevent AD in susceptible patients during anorectal procedures.
  • There is level 1 evidence (from 1 RCT) (Furusawa et al. 2008) that topical lidocaine may help to prevent AD during gentle bowel stimulation.
  • Lidocaine anal block can limit the AD response in susceptible patients undergoing anorectal procedures.
  • Topical lidocaine may prevent AD during digital bowel stimulation but does not prevent AD during anorectal procedures.

Prevention of AD during Pregnancy and Labour

In North America, women represent a third of the SCI population (Ackery et al. 2004).  Approximately 3,000 American women of childbearing age are affected by SCI (Cross et al. 1992).  The ability of women to have children is not usually affected once their menstrual cycle resumes (Jackson & Wadley 1999).  There are increasing numbers of women with SCI who have healthy babies (Cross et al. 1992).  However, during labor and delivery, women with SCI are at high risk of developing uncontrolled AD (Sipski 1991; Sipski & Arenas 2006). 

Recognition and prevention of this life threatening emergency is critical for managing labor in women with SCI (McGregor & Meeuwsen 1985). The majority of women with SCI above T10 experience uterine contractions with only abdominal discomfort, an increase in spasticity and AD (Hughes et al. 1991).  Numerous observational studies, case reports and expert opinions recommend adequate anesthesia in women with SCI during labor and delivery despite the apparent lack of sensation.  However, there are only five studies (n=59)(Cross et al. 1992; Hughes et al. 1991; Cross et al. 1991; Ravindran et al. 1981; Skowronski & Hartman 2008) with observational evidence recording the management specific to AD during labor.  The American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology emphasized that it is important that obstetricians caring for these patients be aware of the specific problems related to SCI (American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2002).   

Table 8:  Prevention of AD during Pregnancy and Labour

Conclusion

  • There is level 4 evidence that women with SCI may give birth vaginally. With vaginal delivery or when cesarean delivery or instrumental delivery is indicated, adequate anesthesia (spinal or epidural if possible) is needed.
  • There is level 4 and 5 evidence (from 2 case series and 2 observational studies) (Cross et al. 1992; Hughes et al. 1991; Cross et al. 1991; Showronski and Hartman 2008) that epidural anesthesia is preferred and effective for most patients with AD during labor and delivery.
  • Adequate anesthesia (spinal or epidural if possible) is needed with vaginal delivery, cesarean delivery or instrumental delivery.
  • Epidural anesthesia is preferred and effective for most women with AD during labor and delivery.

Prevention of AD during General Surgery

As AD may be triggered by a host of somatic and visceral noxious or non-noxious stimuli below the level of injury, a variety of interventions focusing on decreasing afferent information to the spinal cord have been used, including peripheral anesthetic blocks, epidural anesthesia, general anesthesia, or even dorsal rhizotomy (McGregor & Meeuwsen 1985; Barton et al. 1986; Cosman et al. 2002; Cosman & Vu 2005; Kutzenberger et al. 2005).  However, it is important to acknowledge that despite the partial or total loss of sensation below the level of injury, surgical procedures or manipulations can potentially initiate episodes of AD.  Anesthesiologists and surgeons performing surgery on SCI patients must be aware of the interactions of the anesthetic and its effects on AD and how to prevent or manage AD during these procedures.

Table 9: Prevention of AD during Surgery

Two observational studies (Lambert et al. 1982; Eltorai et al. 1997) presented evidence that AD is a common complication during the general surgery in individuals with SCI.  Up to 90% of individuals undergoing surgery with topical anesthesia or no anesthesia developed AD.  Both studies concluded that patients at risk for AD could be protected by either general or spinal anesthesia.

Conclusion

  • There is level 5 evidence (from 2 observational studies) (Lambert et al. 1982; Eltorai et al. 1997) that indicate that patients at risk for autonomic dysreflexia are protected from developing intraoperative hypertension by either general or spinal anesthesia.
  • Anesthesiologists and surgeons dealing with SCI patients must know how to recognize the AD syndrome, how to prevent its occurrence and how to manage it aggressively.
  • Anesthesia should be used during surgical procedures in individuals with SCI despite apparent lack of sensation.

Prevention of AD during FES Exercise

Functional electrical stimulation (FES) is a widely-used modality in the rehabilitation of individuals with SCI ( Sampson et al. 2000; Wood et al. 2001).  Similar to any non-noxious or noxious stimuli below the level of injury, however, FES may also lead to significant afferent stimulation and trigger the development of AD (Ashley et al. 1993; Matthews et al. 1997). 

Table 10: Prevention of AD during FES Exercise

One RCT (n=7) assessed the effect of topical anaesthetic and placebo creams applied to the skin area over the quadriceps muscle 1 hr prior to FES on two different days (Matthews et al. 1997).  As cardiovascular and AD responses during FES were unaffected by topical anaesthetic cream application at the stimulation site, the authors suggested that mechanisms other than skin nociception contribute to FES-induced AD.

Conclusion

  • There is level 1 evidence (from one RCT) (Matthews et al. 1997) supporting no effect of topical anesthetic for the prevention of AD during FES. 
  • Topical anesthetic is not effective for the prevention of AD during FES

Management of Acute AD

Despite appropriate preventative strategies, AD remains common among individuals with SCI.  As previously noted, especially in individuals with cervical or high thoracic injuries, episodes of AD with a significant increase in arterial blood pressure could be asymptomatic (Linsenmeyer et al. 1996; Ekland et al. 2007; McGillivray et al. 2006).The Guidelines of the Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine for management of AD recommends employing non-pharmacological measures initially; if they fail, and systolic blood pressure continues to be at or above 150 mmHg in adults, 120 mmHg in children under 5 years old, 130 mmHg in children 6-12 years old, and 140 mmHg in adolescents, pharmacological agents should be initiated (Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine 2006).

Non-Pharmacological Management of AD

The initial management of an episode of AD involves placing the patient in an upright position to take advantage of an orthostatic reduction in blood pressure (Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine 2001). While there are no studies that evaluate the effect of a sit-up position on blood pressure during the episodes of AD, significant decreases in resting blood pressure have been shown during a tilt or sit-up test from supine position in individuals with SCI (Claydon & Krassioukov 2006; Krassioukov & Harkema 2006; Sidorov et al. 2007). It is proposed that an upright posture will induce pooling of blood into the abdominal and lower extremity vessels as peripheral vasoconstriction is compromised or lost following SCI; thus arterial blood pressure is reduced.  The next step is to loosen any tight clothing and constrictive devices (Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine 2001).  This procedure will also allow more blood to pool into the vessel beds below the level of injury as well as removal of a possible trigger of peripheral sensory stimulation.  Blood pressure should be checked at a minimum of 5 min intervals until the individual is stable (Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine 2001), at which time it is necessary to search for and eliminate the precipitating stimulus and in 85% of cases, can be found to relate to either bladder distention or bowel impaction (Teasell et al. 2000; Mathias & Bannister 2002). The use of antihypertensive drugs should be considered as a last resort and used if the blood pressure remains at 150 mmHg or greater following the steps outlined above (Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine 2001). The goal of such an intervention is to alleviate symptoms and avoidthe complications associated with uncontrolled hypertension (Yarkony et al. 1986; Pine et al. 1991; Eltorai et al. 1992; Valles et al. 2005).

Pharmacological Management of AD

Episodes of AD in individuals with SCI can vary in severity, but in some cases can be asymptomatic and be managed by the individual once they are familiar with their own triggers and symptoms (Linsenmeyer et al. 1996).  However, in some individuals it is difficult to find the trigger for the acute blood pressure elevation and immediate medical attention is required (Elliott & Krassioukov 2006). Antihypertensive drugs with a rapid onset and short duration of action should be used in management of acute episodes (Blackmer 2003). The Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine recommends that if non-pharmacological measures fail and arterial blood pressure remains 150 mmHg or greater, pharmacological management should be initiated (Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine 2001). However, the Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine (2001) does not identify any particular medication for management of AD. Numerous pharmacological agents (e.g., Nifedipine, nitrates, captopril, terzaosin, prazosin, phenoxybenamine, Prostaglandin E2, sildanefil) have been proposed for management of episodes of AD (Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine; Blackmer 2003; Naftchi & Richardson 1997). The majority of the recommendations are based on the clinical management of hypertensive crises in able-bodied populations.  Characteristics and outcomes of studies assessing pharmacological interventions for the management of AD are presented in the following sections.

Nifedipine (Adalat, Procardia)

Nifedipine, a calcium ion influx inhibitor (Ca-channel blocker), selectively inhibits calcium ion influx across the cell membrane of cardiac muscle and vascular smooth muscle while maintaining serum calcium concentrations.  In man, Nifedipine decreases peripheral vascular resistance and creates a modest fall in systolic and diastolic pressure (5-10mm Hg systolic although sometimes larger).  Nifedipine is generally given using the "bite and swallow" method, in a dose of 10 mg.

Table 11:  Nifedipine (Adalat, Procardia)

Five studies (n=59) (Steinberger et al. 1990; Lindan et al. 1985; Thyberg et al. 1994; Kabalin et al. 1993; Dykstra et al. 1987) have evaluated the effects of Nifedipine; two level 2 controlled but not randomized trials (Steinberger et al. 1990; Lindan et al. 1985), and three level 4 studies (Thyberg et al. 1994; Kabalin et al. 1993; Dykstra et al. 1987).  Four of these five studies saw a reduction or alleviation of AD with nifedipine (Steinberger et al. 1990; Thyberg et al. 1994; Kabalin et al. 1993; Dykstra et al. 1987. In their non-randomized control trial, Steinberger and co-investigators (1990) reported that sublingual nifedipine decreased peak systolic, diastolic, and mean blood pressure in SCI individuals undergoing electroejaculation.  In their study, Braddom and Rocco (1991) surveyed 86 physicians with an average of 16.8 years of experience in managing AD in patients with SCI. While pharmacologic treatment of AD varied greatly from physician to physician, antihypertensive medications were the most frequently used medications with Nifedipine being a drug of choice for 48% of physicians for minor AD cases and for 58% of physicians for severe symptomatic AD cases.  Although nifedipine has been the most commonly used agent for management of AD in individuals with SCI (Thyberg et al. 1994; Dykstra et al. 1987; Esmail et al. 2002; Braddom & Rocco 1991), its use has declined recently (Frost 2002; Anton & Townson 2004). There have beenno reported adverse events from the use of nifedipine in thetreatment of AD (Blackmer 2003), although all studies had a very small sample size.  However, a review of nifedipine for the management of hypertensive emergencies not specific to SCI found serious adverse effects such as stroke, acute myocardial infarction, death and numerous instances of severe hypotension (Grossman et al. 1996). Due to several reports of serious adverse reactions occurring after administration of immediate-release nifedipine, the Joint National Committee on Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (1997) has discouraged use of this drug.

Conclusion

  • There is level 2 evidence (from 2 prospective controlled trials) (Steinberger et al. 1990; Lindan et al. 1985) that Nifedipine may be useful to prevent dangerous blood pressure reactions, e.g. during cystoscopy and other diagnostic or therapeutic procedures in SCI injured patients with AD.
  • There is level 5 evidence (from clinical consensus) (Joint National Committee on Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Pressure 1997), that serious adverse effects from Nifedipine may occur and these have been reported in other populations.
  • Nifedipine may be useful to prevent or control AD in SCI individuals, however, serious adverse effects from may occur as those reported in other populations.

Nitrates (Nitroglycerine, Depo-Nit, Nitrostat, Nitrol, Nitro-Bid)

Nitrates are used for an acute episode of AD as they relax vascular smooth muscle, producing vasodilator effects on peripheral arteries and veins.  Dilation of postcapillary vessels, including large veins, promotes peripheral pooling of blood and reduces venous return to the heart, thereby reducing left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (pre-load) and arterial blood pressure.  On the other hand, arteriolar relaxation reduces systemic vascular resistance which leads to reduced arterial pressure (after-load).  If sildenafil has been used within the last 24 hours in an individual with SCI presenting with acute AD, use of an alternative short-acting, rapid-onset antihypertensive agent is recommended.  Nitrates are the second most commonly used agent after nifedipine for management of AD in individuals with SCI (Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine 2001; Braddom & Rocco 1991).  However, with the exception of one case report with intravenous use of nitroprusside (Ravindran et al. 1981) and expert opinions (Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine 2001), no studies exist to support their use in SCI.  There is level 5 evidence (clinical consensus) (Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine 2001; Braddom & Rocco 1991), but no clinical studies which support the use of nitrates in the acute management of AD in SCI.

Conclusion

  • There is level 5 evidence (clinical consensus) (Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine 2001; Braddom & Rocco 1991), but no clinical studies which support the use of nitrates in the acute management of AD in SCI.
  • Nitrates are commonly used in the control of AD in SCI, but not studies have been done to show their effectiveness or safety in SCI.

Captopril

Captopril is a specific competitive inhibitor of angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE).   During an episode of AD, 25mg of captopril is recommended to be administered sublingually. 

Table 12: Captopril

Discussion

From one pre-post study (n=26) (Esmail et al. 2002), captopril was safe and effective in 4 out of 5 episodes for AD management.  This prospective open labeled study and numerous experts’ opinion suggest the use of the captopril as a primary medication in management of AD (Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine 2001; Frost 2002; Anton & Townson 2004).

Conclusion

  • There is level 4 evidence (from one pre-post study) (Esmail et al. 2002) for the use of captopril in the acute management of AD in SCI.
  • Preliminary evidence suggests that captopril is effective for the management of AD in SCI

Terazosin

Terazosin is a long-acting, alpha-1adrenoceptor selective blocking agent.  Selective alpha 1 blockade has been suggested as a good pharmacological choice in the management of AD because of its dual effect at the bladder level (inhibition of urinary sphincter and relaxation of the smooth muscles of blood vessels).

Table 13: Terazosin

Discussion

Regular doses of Terazosin over weeks or months were evaluated in three level 4 experimental studies (n=57) (Vaidyanathan et al. 1998; Swierzewski et al. 1994; Chancellor et al. 1994) in which it appears to be effective in preventing AD without erectile function impairment.  Patients reported moderate to excellent improvement (Chancellor et al. 1994) or even complete termination of the dysreflexic symptoms (Vaidyanathan et al. 1998) during a 3-month period of Terazosin administration.

Conclusion

  • There is limited evidence for the use of Terazosin as an agent for control of AD in SCI individuals.

Prazosin (Minipress)

Prazosin, a postsynaptic alpha-1 adrenoceptor blocker, lowers blood pressure by relaxing blood vessels. Prazosin has a minimal effect on cardiac function due to its alpha-1 receptor selectivity.The recommended starting dose in adults is 0.5 or 1 milligram (mg) taken two or three times a day.

Table 14: Prazosin (Minipress)

Discussion

In a small (n=15) (Krum et al. 1992), but high quality RCT, Prazosin bid was well tolerated and did not affect the baseline blood pressure; AD episodes were also less severe and shorter in duration over a 2 week period.

Conclusion

  • There is level 1 evidence (from one RCT) (Krum et al. 1992), that Prazosin is superior to placebo in the prophylactic management of AD.
  • Prazosin can reduce severity and duration of AD episodes in SCI.

Phenoxybenzamine (Dibenzyline)

Phenoxybenzamine, a long-acting, adrenergic, alpha-receptor blocking agent, can increase blood flow to skin, mucosae, and abdominal viscera and lower supine and erect blood pressures.  The initial dose is 10 mg of Dibenzyline (phenoxybenzamine hydrochloride) bid with increases once daily, usually up to 20-40 mg 2-3 times/days. 

Table 15: Phenoxybenzamine (Dibenzyline)

Conclusion

  • There is level 4 evidence (from one pre-post study and one case series study)  for use of Phenoxybenzamine in the management of AD, however, the results are conflicting with no effects in one study (Lindan et al. 1985) and positive effects in another (McGuire et al. 1976).
  • It is not known whether Phenoxybenzamine is effective for the management of AD in SCI.

Prostaglandin E2

Prostaglandin E2 is a group of hormone-like substances that contribute to a wide range of body functions including the contraction and relaxation of smooth muscle, the dilation and constriction of blood vessels and control of blood pressure.

Table 16: Prostaglandin E2

Discussion

Frankel and Mathias (1980) studied five subjects; 3 subjects underwent administration with and without Prostaglandin E2 and showed that the level of BP recorded during electrical ejaculation decreased with the drug. 

Conclusion

  • There is level 2 evidence from a very small prospective controlled study (Frankel & Mathias 1980) which used subjects as their own controls which showed that the level of BP recorded during electrical ejaculation was substantially reduced with Prostaglandin E2.
  • Prostaglandin E2 is effective for reducing BP responses during eletroejactulation.

Sildanefil (Viagra)

Sildanefil inhibits phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5), relaxes smooth muscle, and increases levels of cGMP in and inflow of blood to the corpus cavernosum.  Sildenafil at recommended doses has no effect in the absence of sexual stimulation.  The recommended dose is 50 mg taken, as needed, approximately 1 hour before sexual activity, but may be taken anywhere from 4 hours to 0.5 hour before sexual activity. Sildanefil is known to enhance the hypotensive effects of nitrates. Thus, nitrates in any form are contraindicated with sildanefil use.

Table 17: Sildanefil (Viagra)

The effect of sildenafil on AD was reported in one small RCT with 13 subjects (Sheel et al. 2005).  Although sildenafil decreased resting BP, no effect on magnitude of AD resulting from vibrostimulation in men with SCI was observed. 

Conclusion

  • There is level 2 evidence (from 1 RCT) (Sheel et al. 1995) that sildenafil citrate had no effect on changes in BP during episodes of AD initiated by vibrostimulation in men with SCI.
  • Sildenafil has no effect on AD responses in men with SCI during ejaculation.

Other Pharmacological Agents Tested for Management of AD

While other pharmacological agents have been used to manage AD in individuals with SCI and while their use have been reported in the literature (e.g., expert opinion, case report) they currently do not have sufficient evident to warrant recommendation.  These include the use of Phenazopyridine for AD associated with cystitis (Paola et al. 2003), magnesium sulfate for AD associated with labour (Maehama et al. 2000) or life-threatening AD in intensive care (Jones & Jones 2002), Diazoxide (Hyperstat) (Erickson 1980) for acute AD episodes and intrathecal baclofen for AD associated with spasticity (Kofler et al. 2009).  In addition, there have been reports of the use of beta blockers (Pasquina et al. 1998), Mecamylamine (Inversine) (Braddom & Rocco 1991) and Hydralzine (Apresoline) (Erickson 1980) for the general management of AD symptoms in individuals with SCI.  

Table 18: Other Pharmacological Agents Tested for Management of AD

Summary

  • There is level 4 evidence (from 4 pre-post studies) (Dykstra et al. 1988; Schurch et al. 2000; Chen et al. 2008; Kuo et al. 2008) that Botulinum toxin injections into the detrusor seem to be a safe and valuable therapeutic option in SCI patients who perform clean intermittent self-catheterization and have incontinence resistant to anticholinergic medications.
  • There is level 4 evidence (from 1 pre-post study) (Igawa et el. 2003) that intravesical capsaicin is effective for reducing episodes of AD in SCI.
  • There is level 1 evidence (from 2 RCTs) (Kim et al. 2003; Giannantoni et al. 2002) that intravesical resiniferatoxin is effective for reducing episodes of AD in patients with SCI.
  • There is level 1 evidence (from 1 RCT) (Giannantoni et al. 2002) that intravesical resiniferatoxin is more effective than intravesical capsaicin.
  • There is level 5 evidence that anticholinergics (from 1 observational study) (Giannantoni et al. 1998) are not associated with reduced incidence of AD episodes.
  • There is level 4 evidence (from one pre-post study and one case series study) (Hohenfellner et al. 2001; Kutzenberger 2007) that sacral deafferentation may be effective in preventing AD.
  • There is level 4 evidence (based on three pre-post/case series studies) (Barton et al. 1986; Sidi et al. 1990; Perkash 2007) that urinary bladder surgical augmentations may result in a decrease of intravesical and urethral pressure and diminish or resolve episodes of AD.
  • There is level 4 evidence (based on 1 case series) (Seoane-Rodriguez et al. 2007) that an intraurethral stent may be an effective means for the long-term management of detrusor-sphincter dysynergia for SCI patients, including those who have previously underwent sphincterotomy.
  • There is level 1 evidence (from 1 RCT) (Cosman & Vu 2005) that lidocaine anal block significantly limits the AD response in susceptible patients undergoing anorectal procedures.
  • There is level 1 evidence (from 1 RCT) (Cosman et al. 2002) that topical lidocaine does not limit or prevent AD in susceptible patients during anorectal procedures.
  • There is level 1 evidence (from 1 RCT) (Furusawa et al. 2008) that topical lidocaine may help to prevent AD during gentle bowel stimulation.
  • There is level 4 evidence that women with SCI may give birth vaginally. With vaginal delivery or when cesarean delivery or instrumental delivery is indicated, adequate anesthesia (spinal or epidural if possible) is needed.
  • There is level 4 and 5 evidence (from 2 case series and 2 observational studies) (Cross et al. 1992; Hughes et al. 1991; Cross et al. 1991; Showronski and Hartman 2008) that epidural anesthesia is preferred and effective for most patients with AD during labor and delivery.
  • There is level 5 evidence (from 2 observational studies) (Lambert et al. 1982; Eltorai et al. 1997) that indicate that patients at risk for autonomic dysreflexia are protected from developing intraoperative hypertension by either general or spinal anesthesia.
  • Anesthesiologists and surgeons dealing with SCI patients must know how to recognize the AD syndrome, how to prevent its occurrence and how to manage it aggressively.
  • There is level 1 evidence (from one RCT) (Matthews et al. 1997) supporting no effect of topical anesthetic for the prevention of AD during FES.
  • There is level 2 evidence (from 2 prospective controlled trials) (Steinberger et al. 1990; Lindan et al. 1985) that Nifedipine may be useful to prevent dangerous blood pressure reactions, e.g. during cystoscopy and other diagnostic or therapeutic procedures in SCI injured patients with AD.
  • There is level 5 evidence (from clinical consensus) (Joint National Committee on Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Pressure 1997), that serious adverse effects from Nifedipine may occur and these have been reported in other populations.
  • There is level 5 evidence (clinical consensus) (Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine 2001; Braddom & Rocco 1991), but no clinical studies which support the use of nitrates in the acute management of AD in SCI.
  • There is level 4 evidence (from one pre-post study) (Esmail et al. 2002) for the use of captopril in the acute management of AD in SCI.
  • There is level 4 evidence (from 3 pre-post studies) (Vaidyanathan et al. 1998; Swierzewski et al. 1994; Chancellor et al. 1994) that regular use of Terazosin may have positive effects on incontinence and AD.
  • There is level 1 evidence (from one RCT) (Krum et al. 1992), that Prazosin is superior to placebo in the prophylactic management of AD.
  • There is level 4 evidence (from one pre-post study and one case series study) for use of Phenoxybenzamine in the management of AD, however, the results are conflicting with no effects in one study (Lindan et al. 1985) and positive effects in another (McGuire et al. 1976).
  • There is level 2 evidence from a very small prospective controlled study (Frankel & Mathias 1980) which used subjects as their own controls which showed that the level of BP recorded during electrical ejaculation was substantially reduced with Prostaglandin E2.
  • There is level 2 evidence (from 1 RCT) (Sheel et al. 1995) that sildenafil citrate had no effect on changes in BP during episodes of AD initiated by vibrostimulation in men with SCI.

Key Points

  • The identification of the possible trigger and decrease of afferent stimulation to the spinal cord is the most effective prevention strategy in clinical practice.
  • Botulinum toxin injections into the detrusor seem to be a safe and valuable therapeutic option in SCI patients who perform clean intermittent self-catheterization and have incontinence resistant to anticholinergic medications.
  • Capsaicin and its analogue, resiniferatoxin, are effective in the management of AD in patients with SCI.
  • Anticholinergics do not appear to be sufficient for the management of AD in SCI.
  • Sacral deafferentation may educe AD during urodynamic investigations.
  • Urinary bladder surgical augmentations may diminish or resolve episodes of AD.
  • An intraurethral stent may be an effective alternative to sphincterotomy in reducing episodes of AD.
  • Lidocaine anal block can limit the AD response in susceptible patients undergoing anorectal procedures.
  • Topical lidocaine may prevent AD during digital bowel stimulation but does not prevent AD during anorectal procedures.
  • Adequate anesthesia (spinal or epidural if possible) is needed with vaginal delivery, cesarean delivery or instrumental delivery is required.
  • Epidural anesthesia is preferred and effective for most women with AD during labor and delivery.
  • Anesthesia should be used during surgical procedures in individuals with SCI despite apparent lack of sensation.
  • Topical anesthetic is not effective for the prevention of AD during FES
  • Nifedipine may be useful to prevent or control AD in SCI individuals, however, serious adverse effects from may occur as those reported in other populations.
  • Nitrates are commonly used in the control of AD in SCI, but no studies have been done to show their effectiveness or safety in SCI.
  • Preliminary evidence suggests that captopril is effective for the management of AD in SCI.
  • There is limited evidence for the use of Terazosin as an agent for control of AD in SCI individuals.
  • Prazosin can reduce severity and duration of AD episodes in SCI.
  • It is not known whether Phenoxybenzamine is effective for the management of AD in SCI.
  • Prostaglandin E2 is effective for reducing BP responses during eletroejaculation.
  • Sildenafil has no effect on AD responses in men with SCI during ejaculation.

References

  • Ackery A, Tator C, Krassioukov. A global perspective on spinal cord injury epidemiology. J Neurotrauma 2004;21:1355-1370.
  • Acute management of autonomic dysreflexia: Individuals with spinal cord injury presenting to health-care facilities. Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine. Paralyzed Veterans of America; 2001.
  • Ahmed HU, Shergill IS, Arya M, Shah PJ. Management of detrusor-external sphincter dyssynergia. Nat Clin Pract Urol 2006;3:368-380.
  • American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology. ACOG committee opinion. Obstetric management of patients with spinal cord injuries. Number 275, September 2002. Committee on Obstetric Practice. American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2002;79:189-191.
  • Anton HA, Townson A. Drug therapy for autonomic dysreflexia. CMAJ 2004;170:1210.
  • Arnold JM, Feng QP, Delaney GA, Teasell RW. Autonomic dysreflexia in tetraplegic patients: evidence for alpha-adrenoceptor hyper-responsiveness. Clin Auton Res 1995;5:267-270.
  • Ashley EA, Laskin JJ, Olenik LM, Burnham R, Steadward RD, Cumming DC, Wheeler GD. Evidence of autonomic dysreflexia during functional electrical stimulation in individuals with spinal cord injuries. Paraplegia 1993;31:593-605.
  • Barton CH, Khonsari F, Vaziri ND, Byrne C, Gordon S, Friis R. The effect of modified transurethral sphincterotomy on autonomic dysreflexia. J Urol 1986;135:83-85.
  • Blackmer J. Rehabilitation medicine: 1. Autonomic dysreflexia. CMAJ 2003;169:931-935.
  • Bladder management for adults with spinal cord injury: A clinical practice guideline for health-care providers. Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine. Paralyzed Veterans of America; 2006.
  • Braddom RL, Rocco JF. Autonomic dysreflexia. A survey of current treatment. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1991;70:234-241.
  • Chancellor MB, Erhard MJ, Hirsch IH, Stass WE. Prospective evaluation of terazosin for the treatment of autonomic dysreflexia. J Urol 1994;151:111-113.
  • Chancellor MB, Rivas DA, Erhard MJ, Hirsch IH, Bagley DH. Flexible cystoscopy during urodynamic evaluation of spinal cord-injured patients. J Endourol 1993;7:531-535.
  • Chen SL, Bih LI, Huang YH, Tsai SJ, Lin TB, Kao YL. Effect of single botulinum toxin A injection to the external urethral sphincter for treating detrusor external sphincter dyssynergia in spinal cord injury. J Rehabil Med 2008;40:744-748.
  • Claydon VE, Krassioukov AV. Orthostatic hypotension and autonomic pathways after spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma 2006;23:1713-1725.
  • Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine. Acute management of autonomic dysreflexia: Adults with spinal cord injury presenting to health-care facilities. In Clinical practice guidelines. Paralyzed Veterans of America; 1997.
  • Cosman BC, Vu TT, Plowman BK. Topical lidocaine does not limit autonomic dysreflexia during anorectal procedures in spinal cord injury: a prospective, double-blind study. Int J Colorectal Dis 2002;17:104-108.
  • Cosman BC, Vu TT. Lidocaine anal block limits autonomic dysreflexia during anorectal procedures in spinal cord injury: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2005;48:1556-1561.
  • Cross LL, Meythaler JM, Tuel SM, Cross AL. Pregnancy following spinal cord injury. West J Med 1991;154:607-611.
  • Cross LL, Meythaler JM, Tuel SM, Cross LA. Pregnancy, labor and delivery post spinal cord injury. Paraplegia 1992;30:890-902.
  • Curt A, Nitsche B, Rodic B, Schurch B, Dietz V. Assessment of autonomic dysreflexia in patients with spinal cord injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1997;62:473-477.
  • DeVivo MJ, Krause JS, Lammertse DP. Recent trends in mortality and causes of death among persons with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80:1411-1419.
  • Dykstra DD, Sidi AA, Anderson LC. The effect of nifedipine on cystoscopy-induced autonomic hyperrelfexia in patients with high spinal cord injuries. J Urol 1987;138:1155-1157.
  • Dykstra DD, Sidi AA, Scott AB, Pagel JM, Goldish GD. Effects of botulinum A toxin on detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia in spinal cord injury patients. J Urol 1988;139:919-922.
  • Ekland M, Krassioukov A, McBride KE, Elliott SL. Incidence of autonomic dysreflexia and silent autonomic dysreflexia in men with SCI undergoing sperm retrieval: Implications for clinical practice. J Spinal Cord Med 2007;30:43-50.
  • Elliott S, Krassioukov A. Malignant autonomic dysreflexia in spinal cord injured men. Spinal Cord 2006;6:386-392.
  • Eltorai I, Kim R, Vulpe M, Kasravi H, Ho W. Fatal cerebral hemorrhage due to autonomic dysreflexia in a tetraplegic patient: case report and review. Paraplegia 1992;30:355-360.
  • Eltorai IM, Wong DH, Lacerna M, Comarr, AE, Montroy R. Surgical aspects of autonomic dysreflexia. J Spinal Cord Med 1997;20:361-364.
  • Erickson RP. Autonomic hyperreflexia: pathophysiology and medical management. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1980;61:431-440.
  • Esmail Z, Shalansky KF, Sunderji R, Anton H, Chambers K, Fish W. Evaluation of captopril for the management of hypertension in autonomic dysreflexia: a pilot study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:604-608.
  • Frankel HL, Mathias CJ. Severe hypertension in patients with high spinal cord lesions undergoing electroejaculation - management with prostaglandin E2. Paraplegia 1980;18:293-299.
  • Frost F. Antihypertensive therapy, nifedipine, and autonomic dysreflexia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:1325-1326.
  • Furlan JC, Fehlings MG, Shannon P, Norenberg MD, Krassioukov AV. Descending vasomotor pathways in humans: Correlation between axonal preservation and cardiovascular dysfunction after spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma 2003;20:1351-1363.
  • Furusawa K, Sugiyama H, Ikeda A, Tokuhiro A, Koyoshi H, Takahashi M, Tajima F. Autonomic dysreflexia during a bowel program in patients with cervical spinal cord injury. Acta Medica Okayama 2007;61(4):221-227.
  • Furusawa K, Sugiyama H, Tokuhiro A, Takahashi M, Nakamura T, Tajima F. Topical anesthesia blunts the pressor response induced by bowel manipulation in subjects with cervical spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2009;47:144-148.
  • Giannantoni A, Di Stasi SM, Scivoletto G, Mollo A, Silecchia A, Fuoco U, Vespasiani G. Autonomic dysreflexia during urodynamics. Spinal Cord 1998;36:756-860.
  • Giannantoni A, Di Stasi SM, Stephen RL, Navarra P, Scivoletto G, Mearini E, Porena M. Intravesical capsaicin versus resiniferatoxin in patients with detrusor hyperreflexia: a prospective randomized study. J Urol 2002;167:1710-1714.
  • Grossman E, Messerli FH, Grodzicki T, Kowey P. Should a moratorium be placed on sublingual nifedipine capsules given for hypertensive emergencies and pseudoemergencies? JAMA 1996;276:1328-1331.
  • Hawkins RL Jr, Bailey HR, Donnovan WH. Autonomic dysreflexia resulting from prolapsed hemorrhoids. Report of a case. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:492-493.
  • Hohenfellner M, Pannek J, Botel U, Bahms S, Pfitzenmaier J, Fichtner J, et al. Sacral bladder denervation for treatment of detrusor hyperreflexia and autonomic dysreflexia. Urol 2001;58:28-32.
  • Hughes SJ, Short DJ, Usherwood MM, Tebbutt H. Management of the pregnant woman with spinal cord injuries. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1991;98:513-518.
  • Igawa Y, Satoh T, Mizusawa H, Seki S, Kato H, Ishizuka O, Nishizawa O. The role of capsaicin-sensitive afferents in autonomic dysreflexia in patients with spinal cord injury. BJU Int 2003;91:637-641.
  • Jackson AB, Wadley V. A multicenter study of women's self-reported reproductive health after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80:1420-1428.
  • Joint National Committee on Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. The sixth report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Arch Intern Med 1997;157:2413–2445.
  • Jones NA, Jones SD. Management of life-threatening autonomic hyper-reflexia using magnesium sulphate in a patient with a high spinal cord injury in the intensive care unit. Br J Anaesth 2002;88:434-438.
  • Kabalin JN, Lennon S, Gill HS, Wolfe V, Perkash I. Incidence and management of autonomic dysreflexia and other intraoperative problems encountered in spinal cord injury patients undergoing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy without anesthesia on a second generation lithotriptor. J Urol 1993;149:1064-1067.
  • Karlsson AK. Autonomic dysreflexia. Spinal Cord 1999;37:383-391.
  • Kim JH, Rivas DA, Shenot PJ, Green B, Kennelly M, Erickson, JR, O’Leary M, Yoshimura N, Chancellor MB. Intravesical resiniferatoxin for refractory detrusor hyperreflexia: a multicenter, blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J Spinal Cord Med 2003;26:358-363.
  • Kofler M, Poustka K, Leopold S. Intrathecal baclofen for autonomic instability due to spinal cord injury. Autonomic Neuroscience: Basic and Clinical 2009; 146:106-110.
  • Krassioukov A, Claydon VE. The clinical problems in cardiovascular control following spinal cord injury: an overview. Prog Brain Res 2005;152C:223-229.
  • Krassioukov A. Which pathways must be spared in the injured human spinal cord to retain cardiovascular control? Prog Brain Res 2005;152:39-47.
  • Krassioukov AV, Bunge RP, Ruckett WR, Bygrave MA. The changes in human spinal cord sympathetic preganglionic neurons after spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 1999;37:6-13.
  • Krassioukov AV, Harkema SJ. Effect of harness application and postural changes on cardiovascular parameters of individuals with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2006;44:780-6.
  • Krassioukov AV, Johns DG, Schramm LP. Sensitivity of sympathetically correlated spinal interneurons, renal sympathetic nerve activity, and arterial pressure to somatic and visceral stimuli after chronic spinal injury. J Neurotrauma 2002;19:1521-1529.
  • Krassioukov AV, Weaver LC. Morphological changes in sympathetic preganglionic neurons after spinal cord injury in rats. Neuroscience 1996;70:211-226.
  • Krassioukov AV, Weaver LC. Reflex and morphological changes in spinal preganglionic neurons after cord injury in rats. Clin Exp Hypertens 1995;17:361-73.
  • Krum H, Louis WJ, Brown DJ, Howes LG. A study of the alpha-1 adrenoceptor blocker prazosin in the prophylactic management of autonomic dysreflexia in high spinal cord injury patients. Clin Auton Res 1992;2:83-88.
  • Kuo HC. Satisfaction with urethral injection of botulinum toxin A for detrusor sphincter dyssynergia in patients with spinal cord lesion. Neurourol Urodyn 2008;27:793-796.
  • Kutzenberger J, Domurath B, Sauerwein D. Spastic bladder and spinal cord injury: seventeen years of experience with sacral deafferentation and implantation of an anterior root stimulator. Artif Organs 2005;29:239-241.
  • Kutzenberger J. Surgical therapy of neurogenic detrusor overactivity (hyperreflexia) in paraplegic patients by sacral deafferentation and implant driven micturition by sacral anterior root stimulation: methods, indications, results, complications, and future prospects. Acta Neurochir Suppl 2007;97(1):333-339.
  • Lambert DH, Deane RS, Mazuzan JE. Anesthesia and the control of blood pressure in patients with spinal cord injury. Anesth Analg 1982;61:344-348.
  • Lindan R, Leffler EJ, Kedia KR. A comparison of the efficacy of an alpha - I - adrenergic blocker in the slow calcium channel blocker in the control of autonomic dysreflexia. Paraplegia 1985;23:34-38.
  • Linsenmeyer TA, Campagnolo DI, Chou IH. Silent autonomic dysreflexia during voiding in men with spinal cord injuries. J Urol 1996;155:519-22.
  • Maehama T, Izena H, Kanazawa K. Management of autonomic hyperreflexia with magnesium sulfate during labor in a woman with spinal cord injury. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;183:492-493.
  • Mathias CJ, Bannister R. Autonomic disturbances in spinal cord lesions. In: Bannister R, Mathias CJ. (ed). Autonomic Failure: A Textbook of Clinical Disorders of the Autonomic Nervous System. Oxford University Press, NYC NY, 2002, p 839-881.
  • Mathias CJ, Frankel HL. Cardiovascular control in spinal man. Ann Rev Physiol 1988;50:577-592.
  • Mathias CJ, Frankel HL. The cardiovascular system in tetraplegia and paraplegia. In: Frankel HL. (ed). Handbook of Clinical Neurology. Elsevier Science, Philadelphia PA, 1992, p 435-456.
  • Matthews JM, Wheeler GD, Burnham RS, Malone LA, Steadward RD. The effects of surface anaesthesia on the autonomic dysreflexia response during functional electrical stimulation. Spinal Cord 1997;35:647-651.
  • McGillivray CF, Krassioukov A, Hitzing SL, Tonack M, Craven C, Greene C. Autonomic dysreflexia – Evaluating knowledge among individuals with SCI and health practitioners. Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine 2006;29:331.
  • McGregor JA, Meeuwsen, J. Autonomic hyperreflexia: a mortal danger for spinal cord-damaged women in labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985;151:330-333.
  • McGuire J, Wagner FM, Weiss RM. Treatment of autonomic dysreflexia with phenoxybenzamine. J Urol 1976;115:53-55.
  • McGuire TJ, Kumar VN. Autonomic dysreflexia in the spinal cord-injured. What the physician should know about this medical emergency. Postgrad Med 1986;80:81-4, 89.
  • Naftchi NE, Richardson JS. Autonomic dysreflexia: pharmacological management of hypertensive crises in spinal cord injured patients. J Spinal Cord Med 1997;20:355-360.
  • Osborn JW, Taylor RF, Schramm LP. Chronic cervical spinal cord injury and autonomic hyperreflexia in rats. Am J Physiol 1990;258:R169-R174.
  • Paola FA, Sales D, Garcia-Zozaya I. Phenazopyridine in the management of autonomic dysreflexia associated with urinary tract infection. J Spinal Cord Med 2003;26:409-411.
  • Perkash I. Transurethral sphincterotomy provides significant relief in autonomic dysreflexia in spinal cord injured male patients: Long-term followup results. The Journal of Urology 2007;177:1026-1029.
  • Pasquina PF, Houston RM, Belandres PV. Beta blockade in the treatment of autonomic dysreflexia: a case report and review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998;79:582-584.
  • Pine ZM, Miller SD, Alonsa JA. Atrial fibrillation associated with autonomic dysreflexia. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1991;70:271-273.
  • Ravindran RS, Cummins DF, Smith IE. Experience with the use of nitroprusside and subsequent epidural analgesia in a pregnant quadriplegic patient. Anesth Analg 1981;60:61-63.
  • Sampson EE, Burnham RS, Andrews BJ. Functional electrical stimulation effect on orthostatic hypotension after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000;81:139-143.
  • Schurch B, Knapp PA, Jeanmonod D, Rodic B, Rossier AB. Does sacral posterior rhizotomy suppress autonomic hyper-reflexia in patients with spinal cord injury? Br J Urol 1998;81:73-82.
  • Schurch B, Stohrer M, Kramer G, Schmid DM, Gaul G, Hauri D. Botulinum-A toxin for treating detrusor hyperreflexia in spinal cord injured patients: a new alternative to anticholinergic drugs? Preliminary results. J Urol 2000;164:692-697.
  • Seoane-Rodriguez S, Sanchez R-Losada J, Montoto-Marques A, Salvador-de la Barrera S, Ferreiro-Velasco ME, Alvarez-Castelo L, Balsa-Mosquera B, Rodriguez-Sotillo A. Long-term follow-up study of intraurethral stents in spinal cord injured patients with detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia. Spinal Cord 2007;45:621-626.
  • Sheel AW, Krassioukov AV, Inglis JT, Elliott SL. Autonomic dysreflexia during sperm retrieval in spinal cord injury: influence of lesion level and sildenafil citrate. J Appl Physiol 2005;99:53-58.
  • Sidi AA, Becher EF, Reddy PK, Dykstra DD. Augmentation enterocystoplasty for the management of voiding dysfunction in spinal cord injury patients. J Urol 1990;143:83-85.
  • Sidorov EV, Townson AF, Dvorak MF, Kwon BK, Steeves J, Krassioukov A. Orthostatic hypotension in the first month following acute spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2007. [Epub ahead of print].
  • Silver JR. Early autonomic dysreflexia. Spinal Cord 2000;38:229-233.
  • Sipski ML, Arenas A. Female sexual function after spinal cord injury. Prog Brain Res 2006;152:441-447.
  • Sipski ML. The impact of spinal cord injury on female sexuality, menstruation and pregnancy: a review of the literature. J Am Paraplegia Soc 1991;14:122-126.
  • Skowronski E, Hartman K. Obstetric management following traumatic tetraplegia: case series and literature review. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2008;48:485-491.
  • Snow JC, Sideropoulos HP, Kripke BJ, Freed MM, Shah NK, Schlesinger RM. Autonomic hyperreflexia during cystoscopy in patients with high spinal cord injuries. Paraplegia 1978;15:327-332.
  • Steinberger RE, Ohl DA, Bennett CJ, McCabe M, Wang SC. Nifedipine pretreatment for autonomic dysreflexia during electroejaculation. Urol 1990;36:228-231.
  • Swierzewski SJ, Gormley EA, Belville WD, Sweetser PM, Wan J, McGuire EJ. The effect of terazosin on bladder function in the spinal cord injured patient. J Urol 1994;151:951-954.
  • Teasell RW, Arnold JM, Krassioukov A, Delaney GA. Cardiovascular consequences of loss of supraspinal control of the sympathetic nervous system following spinal cord injuries. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000;81:506-516.
  • Teichman JM, Barber DB, Rogenes VJ, Harris JM. Malone antegrade continence enemas for autonomic dysreflexia secondary to neurogenic bowel. J Spinal Cord Med 1998;21:245-247.
  • Thyberg M, Ertzgaard P, Gylling M, Granerus G. Effect of nifedipine on cystometry-induced elevation of blood pressure in patients with a reflex urinary bladder after a high level spinal cord injury. Paraplegia 1994;32:308-313.
  • Vaidyanathan S, Singh G, Soni BM, Hughes PL, Mansour P, Oo T, Bingley J, Sett P. Do spinal cord injury patients always get the best treatment for neuropathic bladder after discharge from regional spinal injuries centre? Spinal Cord 2004;42:438-442.
  • Vaidyanathan S, Soni BM, Dundas S, Krishnan KR. Urethral cytology in spinal cord injury patients performing intermittent catheterization. Paraplegia 1994;32:493-500.
  • Vaidyanathan S, Soni BM, Sett P, Watt JW, Oo T, Bingley J. Pathophysiology of autonomic dysreflexia: long-term treatment with terazosin in adult and paediatric spinal cord injury patients manifesting recurrent dysreflexic episodes. Spinal Cord 1998;36:761-770.
  • Valles M, Benito J, Portell E, Vidal J. Cerebral hemorrhage due to autonomic dysreflexia in a spinal cord injury patient. Spinal Cord 2005;43:738-740.
  • Waites KB, Canupp KC, DeVivo MJ. Epidemiology and risk factors for urinary tract infection following spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993a;74:691-695.
  • Waites KB, Canupp KC, DeVivo MJ. Eradication of urinary tract infection following spinal cord injury. Paraplegia 1993b;31:645-652.
  • Wood DE, Dunkerley AL, Tromans AM. Results from bone mineral density scans in twenty-two complete lesion paraplegics. Spinal Cord 2001;39:145-148.
  • Yarkony GM, Katz RT, Wu Y. Seizures secondary to autonomic dysreflexia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1986;67:834-835.

Bladder Management

Introduction

Bladder dysfunction in persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) can be disabling medically, physically, and socially. Most people with SCI have some degree of bladder dysfunction.

Normally, the bladder is able to store urine with detrusor (i.e., bladder wall muscle) relaxation, at low pressures, until it is socially appropriate to void. At the appropriate time, the sphincter muscles relax, detrusor contracts, and bladder emptying is achieved in a low pressure, coordinated manner. This coordinated function is achieved by the pons micturition centre and timing is controlled by the frontal cortex. The ability to fill the bladder under low pressure is of utmost importance in maintaining health of the kidneys and maintaining continence. The ability to empty the bladder completely on a regular basis in a low pressure manner is also important in maintaining kidney health and preventing urinary tract infections.

After spinal cord injury, the tracts to the pons and cortex are disrupted, hence the loss of coordinated bladder filling and emptying. Although the main types of bladder dysfunction after SCI will be discussed below, it is important in treating people with bladder dysfunction after SCI to appreciate that there are main goals, as follows: achieving regular bladder emptying and avoiding stasis; avoiding high filling and voiding pressures; maintaining continence and avoiding frequency and urgency; and preventing and treating complications such as urinary tract infections (UTIs), stones, strictures and autonomic dysreflexia.

In the present chapter, the literature has been classified into sections pertaining to type of bladder dysfunction i.e., neurogenic overactivity (hypperreflexia) or areflexia, and then methods of treating these either pharmacologically or non-pharmacologically. This includes a section describing literature addressing various bladder management methods. Prevention of complications is best achieved with proper management of the type of bladder dysfunction. The last section focuses on UTI prevention and treatment.

Wolfe DL, Ethans K, Hill D, Hsieh JTC, Mehta S, Teasell RW, Askes H (2010). Bladder Health and Function Following Spinal Cord Injury. In Eng JJ, Teasell RW, Miller WC, Wolfe DL, Townson AF, Hsieh JTC, Connolly SJ, Mehta S, Sakakibara BM, editors. Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Evidence. Version 3.0. Vancouver: p 1-19.

Types of Bladder Dysfunction in SCI

There are two main types of bladder dysfunction in SCI:1) neurogenic detrusor overactivity, usually associated with associated sphincter dysynergia (Detrusor external spincter dyssynergia: DESD) and 2) detrusor areflexia. Occasionally detrusor overactivity is seen without associated sphincter dysynergia in the SCI population which can result in difficulty with continence. Methods to improve continence in those with or without DESD are often similar and as such, are addressed in the sections on enhancing bladder volumes in DESD.

Detrusor Overactivity Associated with Sphincter Dysynergia (DESD)

This type of dysfunction tends to be seen in those with injuries of the spinal cord affecting the upper motor neurons, i.e., often in people with L1 spinal level lesions or above. In these cases, the lack of coordination of the sphincter and the detrusor is caused by the spinal cord lesion not allowing coordination by the pons. Both the detrusor and the sphincter are overactive due to lack of control and descending inhibition from the pons and cortex, and both sphincter and detrusor contract reflexively when stretched. The detrusor becomes overactive, reflexively contracting at small volumes, and contracting against an overactive sphincter, to cause high pressures in the bladder. This leads to incontinence (when the detrusor contracts hard enough to overcome the sphincter contraction), incomplete emptying (due to the sphincter co-contraction), and reflux (due to the high bladder pressures) with resultant recurrent bladder infections, stones, hydronephrosis, pyelonephritis, and renal failure.

Detrusor Areflexia

In the case of a flaccid bladder, loss of detrusor muscle tone prevents bladder emptying and leads to bladder wall damage from over-filling, urine reflux and an increase in infection risk due to stasis. The sphincter tone also tends to be flaccid (at least the external sphincter) causing incontinence, especially with maneuvers that increase intraabdominal pressure (so-called “Valsalva” maneuvers). These maneuvers include sneezing, coughing, but more relevant for the SCI individual, straining during transfers. Internal sphincter tone may be intact due to the higher origin of the sympathetic innervation, thus complete emptying, even with externally applied suprapubic pressure, may be difficult.

Compared to DESD, patients with detrusor areflexia comprise a much smaller proportion of ones practice and there is very little literature examining the effectiveness of interventions in which these patients comprise a significant proportion of the subject pool. Therefore, in the present review the focus is on the literature addressing DESD therapy. In some cases, individual papers may include persons with detrusor areflexia and individual treatments or management methods may still be appropriate for and applied to those with an areflexic bladder.

DESD Therapy in SCI

Due to the small capacity bladder seen with neurogenic detrusor overactivity, and the potential for high bladder pressures leading to reflux, hydronephrosis, and kidney damage, and due to the potential for the contractions and small volumes to cause incontinence, the goals of therapy are to: 1) enhance bladder volume while lowering bladder filling pressures, and 2) to empty the bladder regularly in a low pressure voiding manner, usually with intermittent catheterization in people with an intact external sphincter, or external drainage in people that have had a procedure to physically or chemically obliterate the external sphincter. Methods to enhance bladder volumes will be discussed first. Note that this pertains to people usually on concomitant intermittent catheterization for drainage. Occasionally the volume enhancing treatments below will be used in combination with an indwelling catheter to avoid leakage around the catheter.

Enhancing Bladder Volumes Pharmacologically

Anticholinergic Therapy for SCI-Related Detrusor Overactivity

The body of the detrusor is smooth muscle that contains muscarinic receptors that are triggered by acetylcholine to cause contraction of the muscle. Therefore, to relax the detrusor and allow it to fill with higher volumes under lower pressure, anticholinergics may be used. Common marketed medications in this class for overactive bladder include oxybutynin (available as Ditropan, Ditropal XL, Oxytrol, Uromax, etc), tolterodine (available as Detrol, Detrol LA), and more recently, trospium chloride (Trosec), propiverine hydrochloride (Mictonorm) and M3-receptor specific medications darifenacin (Enablex) and solifenacin (Vesicare).

Table 1 Summary Table of Oral Anticholinergics

Discussion

Although there are numerous anticholinergics available for use in overactive bladder, few have actually been used in clinical trials for people with SCI and neurogenic detrusor overactivity. Those that have been used for SCI-related neurogenic bladder are presented here.

Propiverine has both anticholinergic and calcium channel blocking properties, thus decreasing involuntary smooth muscle contractions. In the SCI population, a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, multicentre (n=124 with 113 completers) study, utilizing 15mg tid administration of propiverine over 2 weeks yielded significant improvement of SCI detrusor hyperreflexia represented by increased maximal cystometric bladder capacity (Stohrer et al. 1999).  A subsequent increase in residual urine volume was found, as is the goal in those on concurrent intermittent catheterization. Side effects (primarily dry mouth) were considered tolerable. 

Oxybutynin is an anticholinergic agent used extensively clinically to treat overactive bladder, yet few studies have been performed on the neurogenic population with this medication.  Newer versions of oxybutynin in longer acting forms have sparked renewed interest in this medication with the hopes to decrease side effects seen with the short acting oxybutynin. O’Leary et al. (2003), in a small (n=10) pre-post trial showed that controlled-release oxybutynin was efficacious for SCI individuals with detrusor hyperreflexia as reflected by significantly increased bladder volume with decreased mean number of voids per 24 hours.  However, post-void residual volumes, nocturia and weekly incontinence episodes did not change significantly.

Although oxybutynin is commonly chosen to treat overactive bladder, it is accompanied by annoying side effects such as dry mouth.  A newer anticholinergic that causes less dry mouth, tolterodine, has also been shown to be efficacious for the treatment of neurogenic bladder dysfunction.  In a RCT tolterodine was shown to be significantly better at increasing intermittent catheterization (IC) volumes (p<0.0005) and reducing incontinence (p<0.001) but was similar in its effects on cystometric bladder capacity when compared to placebo (Ethans et al. 2004). This trial was small, thus type 2 error is possible. As part of the eligibility criteria for this study, subjects were using oxybutynin and intermittent catheterization prior to a 4-day washout before randomization to the tolterodine vs placebo study. This design allowed for a comparison between oxybutynin and tolterodine where the difference in effectiveness of the two drugs were found to be equivocal with respect to IC volumes, degree of incontinence and bladder capacity. Horstmann (2006) found that tolterodine improved reflex volumes, cystometric capacity, and maximum detrusor pressures. Although this study also evaluated trospium, the 2 medications were both only evaluated in a pre-post manner rather than head to head comparison.

Although available in Europe for many years, trospium chloride (an anticholinergic medication that is reported not to cross the blood-brain barrier) has been approved in North America only recently for use in overactive bladder.  The efficacy of trospium chloride (20mg bid) in SCI with detrusor hyperreflexia was confirmed by Stohrer et al. (1991) in a RCT.  Highly significant (p<0.001) responses were found in favour of trospium chloride vs placebo for increased  bladder capacity and compliance, and decreased bladder pressure with low side effects and no effect on flow rate and residual urine volumes. Horstmann et al. (2006) found that trospium chloride improved reflex volumes, cystometric capacity, and maximum detrusor pressures. Presumably the cognitive changes seen on psychometric testing with medications such as oxybutinin are not seen with this medication due to lack of crossing the blood brain barrier, but this aspect has not been tested in persons with SCI.

More recent investigations have been conducted to provide comparison information about the relative efficacy and presence of side effects associated with these anticholinergic options (Amend et al. 2008; Stohrer et al. 2007). Stohrer et al. (2007) showed similarities in efficacy in a comparison study of propiverine vs oxybutynin that employed a double-blind, randomized, controlled study design. Both treatments significantly improved bladder capacity and reduced maximum detrusor pressure although fewer side effects (most notably dry mouth) were evident in subjects in the propiverine group. Of note, Amend et al. (2008) examined 3 combinations of anti-cholinergics in subjects (n=27) whose initial symptoms of incontinence did not completely resolve – even with dosages doubled from manufacturer recommendations (i.e., Horstmann et al. 2006). These authors added a second anti-cholinergic medication such that participants took either 1) tolterodine / oxybutynin, 2) trospium / tolterodine or 3) oxybutynin / trospium and demonstrated that 85% of patients were treated successfully, despite having mostly unsatisfactory outcomes with a single medication. Each initial medication was maintained at the high (i.e., double dose) and there were no clear combinations that were superior to the other in terms of either effectiveness or side effect profile.

In addition, Kennelly et al. (2009) reported that a transdermal method of oxybutinin was effective in increasing the proportion of clean intermittent catheterizations without leaking as well as improving various urodynamic measures (e.g., reflex volume, amplitude of detrusor contraction, maximum  bladder capacity, residual urine volume) in a pre-post investigation (n=24). These positive effects were seen and more importantly there were fewer side effects than typically seen with oral delivery, even at up to three times the standard dose. 

Conclusion

  • Level 1 evidence from two RCTs supports the use of propiverine in the treatment of detrusor hyperreflexia resulting in significantly improved bladder capacity, with one of these trials showing equivalent results to oxybutinin but fewer side effects, notably dry mouth.
  • Level 1 evidence from a single RCT supports the use of tolterodine vs placebo to significantly increase intermittent catheterization volumes and decrease incontinence in neurogenic detrusor overactivity.
  • There is level 2 evidence from a single open label prospective controlled trial that  tolterodine and oxybutynin are equally efficacious in SCI patients with neurogenic detrusor overactivity except that tolterodine results in less dry mouth.
  • Level 4 evidence from single pre-post trials support the potential benefits of controlled-release oxybutynin as well as a transdermal system for oxybutinin administration, the latter with reduced side effect profile. 
  • There is level 4 evidence from a single study that suggests benefits such as reduced incontinence and increased bladder capacity may be seen with combination treatments of 2 of oxybutinin, trospium or tolterodine, even in patients with unsatisfactory outcomes following a trial with one of these medications.
  • Level 1 evidence from a single RCT supports the use of trospium chloride to increase bladder capacity and compliance, and decrease bladder pressure with very few side effects in SCI individuals with neurogenic bladder.
  • Propiverine, oxybutynin, tolterodine and trospium chloride are efficacious anticholinergic agents for the treatment of SCI neurogenic bladder.
  • Treatment with 2 of oxybutynin, tolterodine or trospium may be effective for the treatment of SCI neurogenic bladder in those not previously responding to one of these medications.
  • Oxybutynin co-treatment with verapamil may enhance the standard formulation of oxybutynin in the treatment of SCI detrusor hyperreflexia.
  • Tolterodine, propiverine, or transdermal application of oxybutinin likely result in less dry mouth but are similarly efficacious to oral oxybutynin in terms of improving neurogenic detrusor overactivity.

Toxin Therapy for SCI-Related Detrusor Overactivity

Botulinum toxin, the most toxic naturally occurring substance, used in minute doses can be administered therapeutically. Botulinum toxin A (BTx-A) has been used for many disorders including strabismus, focal spasticity, hyperhydrosis, cosmetic disorders (wrinkles) and others.  A promising emerging use is for neurogenic detrusor overactivity treatment in individuals with SCI. The advantage of botulinum toxin over systemic administration of medications such as anti-cholinergics is the treatment of focal portions of the dysfunctional voiding process. Application of botulinum toxin focally to the detrusor directs the drug to the area of need and avoids systemic side effects. There are various types of botulinum toxin available, including various types of botulinum toxin type A. When evaluating the literature in this area, for example comparing Dysport to Botox, one must be very aware that although these medications are both botulinum toxin type A, they are very different and units cannot be compared or interchanged.

The use of capsaicin (CAP), a vanilloid, as a topical temporary analgesic is not uncommon as evidenced by over-the-counter ointments available for purchase in local pharmacies.  Localized and reversible antinociception by capsaicin is a result of induced C-fibre conduction and subsequent neuropeptide release inactivation (Dray 1992).  Although C-fibers are not involved in normal voiding, neuroplastic changes to C-fiber bladder afferent growth account for injury emergent C-fiber mediated voiding reflex (i.e., spinal detrusor hyperreflexia; (deGroat 1995)).  Resiniferatoxin (RTX) is another vanilloid which has been studied for its similar beneficial effects, with less irritation to the bladder and is thus better tolerated. By chemically decreasing C-fiber bladder afferent influence with intravesical vanilloids (i.e., CAP, RTX) bladder contractility is decreased and bladder capacity is increased (Evans 2005). 

Table 2 Toxin Therapy for SCI-Related Detrusor Overactivity

Discussion

Botulinum toxin

In 2005 Schurch et al., published the first multi-centre trial evaluating the efficacy of botulinum toxin A (Botox) injections into the detrusor muscle in people with SCI to reduce incontinence and increase bladder capacity. This landmark trial was the first published randomized, placebo controlled study to evaluate botulinum toxin for neurogenic overactive bladder. The study evaluated the effects of 200 IU, 300 IU, or placebo injected into the detrusor wall. The results revealed a significant decrease in incontinence by about half for both Botox groups, and a significant drop in maximum detrusor pressure. Baseline maximum detrusor pressures were 92.6cm H2O and 77.0 cm H2O in the 300 IU and 200 IU groups, respectively, and by 2 weeks had dropped to 41.0 cm H20 and 31.6 cm H20), respectively. Dramatic improvements were seen in cystometric capacity with baseline being 293 cc and 260cc in the 300 and 200 group respectively, and improving by 2 weeks to 479cc and 482 cc respectively. Mean reflex detrusor volume improved at 6 weeks in the 300 U BTx A group and at 24 weeks in the 200 U BTx A group (p<0.021). The significant improvements were mostly maintained out to 6 months, at which point the study follow-up was terminated - thus, the true duration of effect of the injection is unknown.

Ehren et al. (2007) studied a different form of botulinum toxin A, Dysport, using 500 IU in a placebo controlled study. These authors also found improved continence, cystometric capacity, and decreased pressures. In addition, concomitant anti-cholinergic use, tolterodine, was found to be less in the botulinum toxin group.

Schurch and colleagues (2000) were also the first group to publish a large prospective trial on the use of botulinum toxin for neurogenic detrusor overactivity to improve incontinence and increase bladder capacity.  This first trial was not placebo controlled, but given the impressive changes in objective measures such as urodynamic measures, it bears considerable significance. Pre-injection, the subjects had detrusor hyperreflexia and urge incontinence resistant to high-dose oral anticholinergic treatment and emptied their bladders by intermittent self-catheterization.  By 6 weeks post injection, ninety percent of subjects were continent between catheterizations in conjunction with markedly decreased or withdrawn anticholinergic drug administration.  Post-void residuals were significantly increased, which is the goal with people on intermittent catheterizations, and significant increases in cystometric bladder capacity as well as decreases in maximum detrusor voiding pressure were found.  Autonomic dysreflexic hypertensive crises were abolished in the 3 patients with a history of autonomic dysreflexia. This group reported that a dose of 300 units of Botox was required for successful treatment of detrusor overactivity lasting at least 9 months per injection. These results were amplified by a large scale study (n=200 - 167 with SCI) involving a retrospective case series design across 10 European centres (Reitz et al. 2004). This study showed significant improvements in a wide variety of urodynamic-related measures that were maintained for up to 36 weeks following a single procedure of botulinum toxin injections to the detrusor. Several smaller open-label studies have had similar promising results (Hajebraimi 2005, Klaphajone 2005, Patki 2006, Tow 2007, Akbar 2007, Kuo 2008, Grosse 2009, Giannantoni et al. 2009, Chen et al. 2010). In all of these studies, incontinence was reduced and bladder capacity increased with botulinum toxin. The unique aspects of each of these will be noted below.

Klaphajone (2005) addressed the question of low compliance bladders in people with SCI. People with poor bladder compliance had been excluded in previous large trials. In this open-label trial, the authors found that bladder compliance, bladder capacity, and reflex detrusor volume all increased and maximum detrusor pressure decreased. However, most of these effects were only seen out to 16 weeks and not to 36 weeks (or longer) as has been shown in other studies in people with compliant but spastic bladders. An evaluation between these two points of 16 weeks and 36 weeks would have been helpful to learn how long to expect effects to last in this type of neurogenic bladder.

Dysport, at 1000 IU, was similiarly found to have beneficial effects (Patki 2006) in an open-labelled trial of 37 people with SCI and drug resistant neurogenic detrusor overactivity. At mean follow up of 7 months the maximum cystometric capacity, maximal detrusor pressure, quality of life and incontinence were significantly improved, and 86% were able to stop anticholinergics.

Recently, Kuo (2006) evaluated the effects of suburothelial injections of botulinum toxin A instead of intradetrusor muscle injection, in hopes of reducing risk of urinary retention in those with neurogenic bladder dysfunction who continue to exhibit voiding dysfunction (frequency, urgency, and incontinence). The proposed mechanism for effect is addressing the afferent system with known effects on the P2X3 and TRYP V1 receptors, thus presumably decreasing the reflexic activity by targeting these receptors on the afferent loop. These subjects were not on intermittent catheterization at time of enrolment although perhaps some should have been as 58% of the people with SCI had baseline post-void residual values of >150ml at baseline. Only 8/24 of the subjects had SCI, and were incomplete or complete, with levels from C6 –S2. Similar beneficial effects to the other studies were seen, with 92% of subjects with SCI becoming continent, but post-void residual increased by 4 times the baseline value. Thus, although the goal of subendothelial injections was to reduce the degree of urinary retention, this goal was not achieved, and no additional benefits were seen over those seen in studies with intra-muscular injection. Head to head comparisons would be required to indicate which type of injection is better. Certainly one cannot conclude from this study that suburothelial injections protect against worsening urinary retention.

Tow et al. (2007) assessed Botox in an open-label fashion and added frequency of catheterizations to the outcomes. This was significantly improved at the 6 week point but not at 24 weeks. Other measures seen in the previous studies were similarly improved, but this study, as did the 2000 Schurch study, followed subjects for 9 months. Only the improvement in catheterized volumes was maintained to the 9 month mark, while most of the other improvements persisted only until the 6 month mark. This study was small (n=15) and not placebo controlled. Perhaps the reason for not reaching statistical significance for changes out to 9 months was small sample size, as Schurch et al. (2000) did find many of these same parameters attained significance at 9 months.

Giannantoni et al. (2009) prospectively followed 17 persons with motor complete SCI and bladder dysfunction due to neurogenic detrusor overactivity over a period of 6 years as they were treated with 300U of Botox with re-injections as required. In addition to the prolonged follow-up period, which showed continued effectiveness and minimal side effects associated with ongoing treatment, this investigation incorporated an assessment of incontinence-related quality of life. Improvements in this measure were maintained throughout the treatment period.

Akbar et al. (2007) used Dysport in an open-label fashion with the objective of reporting effects of repeated use of botulinum toxin to the detrusor. Some of these patients had systemic weakness after injections of 1000 IU, but when reducing the dose to 750 IU this side effect subsided. The subjects were reinjected with botulinum toxin when their symptoms returned or when urodynamic studies revealed a return to baseline. The repeat injections were 7.8-8.0 months apart for the first 3 injections, then 9 months for the subsequent injection, although fewer patients continued in the study to this point (11 as compared to 41 receiving 3 injections). Compliance, maximum detrusor pressure, and capacity all improved significantly with respect to baseline with all reinjections. All these numbers showed a slight gradual improvement with each subsequent injection, but statistical analysis was not performed to show if this modest improvement was significant.

Hori (2008) addressed patient satisfaction with detrusor injections of botulinum toxin A by way of a 5-minute questionnaire conducted via telephone. 90% of people who had botulinum toxin A injections for neurogenic detrusor overactivity stated they would consider staying on this treatment long-term. This group has had low annual withdrawal rate from this long-term treatment and a high annual new patient starting rate, prompting the authors to conclude that health care systems would be advised to incorporate this new treatment option as part of routine service provision.

A retrospective trial (Grosse 2009) compared the effects of Dysport (BTX-A) in doses 500-1000 IU to Botox in doses 200-400 IU. The different doses of Dysport had no difference at follow up of 3.8 months, and comparison of the Dysport group to the Botox group revealed no difference at 3 months. Although the effect lasted 9.5 months in the Dysport 500 group compared to 16.1 months in the Dysport 1000 group, this was not judged to be statistically significant, but seems to have clinical significance. The difference does raise the question of whether larger dosing may have longer lasting effects, and certainly has potential for future studies. Note in this study 9/28 in Dysport group did not respond compared to 7/28 in the Botox group. One subject who received Dysport 750 IU experienced transient hypoasthenia.

Capsaicin

deSeze et al. (1998) has provided level 1 evidence in support of the ability of CAP to improve bladder function (decrease frequency and leakages) by increasing bladder capacity.  These authors found that 30 days after instillation, CAP was superior to placebo in decreasing 24h voiding freq (p=0.016), decreasing 24h leakages (p=0.0008), increasing maximal cystometric capacity (p=0.01), and decreasing maximal detrusor pressure, although not significantly.  They found similar side effects in each group. This corroborates other small, non-RCT studies that also reported significant CAP-induced increases in bladder capacity (Das et al. 1996; Dasgupta et al. 1998).

George et al. (2007) reported use of a capsaicin one time instillation and reported that the “efficacy” of cystometric capacity was significant. However, when evaluating the data, it seems the significant difference was actually a significant decline in capacity at 3 hours (pre=224.6 cc, 3 hr post=139.6 cc, p=0.015) and a non-significant decline at 1 week (174.2 cc at 1 week, p=0.059). The authors claim that there was a marked, progressive and overall improvement following capsaicin except for leak point pressure. But the statistical results do not support this claim, and only leak volume was improved statistically at 2 weeks. Autonomic dysreflexia, a significant side effect, was reported in 2 patients following CAP. Although this study included blinded evaluations of oxybutynin vs propantheline instillation, CAP evaluations could not be blinded and therefore, discussion of oxybutynin vs propantheline results are undertaken separately. 

The Dasgupta group (1998) confirmed presence of metaplasia, dysplasia, flat carcinoma in situ.  However, papillary or solid invasive cancer were not detected after 5 years of follow-up.   Further surveillance is required up to 10 years when chemical carcinogenic morphologies typically present.

Resiniferotoxin

deSeze et al. (2004) established that RTX was similarly effective in increasing bladder capacity when compared to CAP.  CAP was significantly more effective at increasing urgency delay (p<0.01) but there was only a trend to greater maximum bladder capacity in favour of CAP.  There was also a statistically significant increase with CAP for the side effect, suprapubic pain, although it was clinically tolerable and brief (p<0.04).  The increase in persistent clinical improvements due to RTX over CAP at 90 days follow-up was not statistically significant.

The efficacy of RTX vs placebo was confirmed in an RCT conducted by Silva et al. (2005) where they found that RTX was responsible for significantly increased volume of first involuntary detrusor contraction (FDC; 143±95mL vs184±93mL; p=0.03), maximum cystometric capacity (MCC; 115±61mL vs 204±92mL; p=0.02), decreased urinary frequency (p=0.01) and incontinence (p=0.03) with similar side effects as compared to placebo. Kim et al. (2003) confirmed the improvements in SCI bladder function and further investigated the effect of dose (single 100 ml instillation of 0.005, 0.025, 0.05, 0.10, 0.2, 0.5, 1.0 microM RTX or placebo).  Despite the small sample size in each dose category, MCC increased by 53% and 48% for the two highest dosages by 3 weeks post-treatment.  Similarly, incontinence episodes decreased by 51.9% and 52.7%. 

Nociception/orphanin phenylalanine glutamine

Nociception/orphanin phenylalanine glutamine (N/OFG) is a heptadecapeptide (Meunier et al. 1995; Reinscheid et al. 1995) that acts on sensory innvervation of the lower urinary tract in a similar fashion to CAP and RTX. It activates the G protein coupled receptor nociceptin orphan peptide and thus has an inhibitory effect on the micturition reflex in the rat (Lecci et al. 2000).  Following a successful preliminary human study, Lazzeri et al. (2003) confirmed that N/OFG versus placebo is responsible for a significant increase in bladder capacity (p<0.001) and threshold volume of detrusor overactivity (p<0.001), and a non-significant decrease of maximum bladder pressure of the dysfunctional neurogenic bladder. These results were verified in an additional small-scale RCT (n=18) of a 10 day course of N/OFG treatment vs placebo (saline). Statistically significant improvements to bladder capacity (assessed by daily voiding diary) and urine leakage episodes were seen in the treated group but not with placebo (Lazzeri et al. 2006). The authors conclude that this inhibition of the micturition reflex supports nociceptin orphan peptide receptor agonists as a possible new treatment for neurogenic bladders of SCI patients.

Conclusion

  • Level 1 evidence based on two RCTs supports the use of Botox A injections into the detrusor muscle to provide targeted treatment for neurogenic detrusor overactivity and urge incontinence resistant to high-dose oral anticholinergic treatments with intermittent self-catheterization in SCI.  Numerous level 3 and 4 studies confirm the efficacy and safety. 
  • Level 1 evidence supports the use of vanillanoid compounds such as capsaicin or resiniferatoxin to increase maximum bladder capacity and decrease urinary frequency and leakages in neurogenic detrusor overactivity of spinal origin.
  • Level 4 evidence exists to suggest that intravesical capsaicin instillation in bladders of SCI individuals does not increase the rate of common bladder cancers after 5 years of use. 
  • Level 1 evidence based on two small-scale RCTs supports the use of N/OFG, a nociceptin orphan peptide receptor agonist for the treatment of neurogenic bladder in SCI.
  • Overall botulinum toxin for neurogenic detrusor overactivity in SCI is effective in reducing incontinence and excessive bladder pressure while improving bladder capacity for those resistant to, or intolerant of, oral anticholinergics.
  • Capsaicin seems to have some clinical benefits but the side effects of pain and AD are concerning for clinical use. Resiniferotoxin seems to be tolerated much better and has similar improvements therapeutically. Pharmaceutical formulation difficulties make it unavailable for clinical use at present.

Intravesical Instillations for SCI-Related Detrusor Overactivity

Intravesical instillations are intended as a means for increasing bladder capacity, lowering pressures, and decreasing incontinence, with the potential for decreased systemic side effects compared to oral medications. Capsaicin and resiniferotoxin have been discussed under toxins, but in fact may also be administered as an intravesical instillation. Other medications used in this manner are the anticholinergics such as oxybutynin and propantheline which are presented below. Most of these protocols consist of dissolving the medication in a liquid solution, and instilling the medication after emptying the bladder by intermittent catheterization, then leaving it in place until the next scheduled intermittent catherization.

Table 3 Intravesical Instillations for SCI-Related Detrusor Overactivity

Discussion

George et al. (2007) described results with a pre-post trial with both propantheline and oxybutynin. This group also reported effects of capsaicin, but will not be reported as comparative data here due to the different treatment schedule used for capsaicin. Unfortunately, the data is not compared directly between propantheline and oxybutynin, as it was noted that overall the treatments resulted in a significant decrease in leak volume and leak frequency with no significant change in cystometric capacity, leak point pressures and intermittent catheterization volumes. In separate evaluations of propantheline and oxybutynin, it seems only propantheline resulted in significant change in leak frequency, and all other parameters were not changed for either medications before and after therapy. Two of the patients with the oxybutynin instillations developed systemic side effects typical of those on oral medications.

Vaidyananthan et al. (1998) reported a pre-post trial (n=7) for which individuals originally managed by condom catheterization were switched to intermittent catheterization for a period of time, followed by another period when an intra-vesical instillation of oxybutynin was also administered. Although no group statistical results were reported, all subjects showed improved continence with intermittent catheterization and even moreso when oxybutynin was added. Quality of life scores were mixed with intermittent catheterization alone but showed a definite improvement when oxybutynin was added. This may have been partly due to a reduced incidence of UTIs with the combination of intermittent catheterization and intra-vesical oxybutynin. The real implications of the instillations of oxybutynin alone are not known from this study.

Singh and Thomas (1995) presented a pre-post study with oxybutynin instillations, and were unable to show any significant improvements. Given the equivocal results noted in each of these studies (e.g., lack of effect and presence of possible systemic side effects), intra-vesical instillation of oxybutin cannot be recommended for use.

Conclusion

  • There is level 4 evidence from 3 studies that instillations with oxybutinun or propantheline have equivocal benefits for neurogenic bladder in people with SCI. This lack of effect may be compounded by level 4 evidence suggesting systemic absorption may occur with this therapy, resulting in systemic side effects.
  • Intravesical instillations with oxybutinun or propantheline are ineffective for treating neurogenic bladder in people with SCI.

Other Pharmaceutical Treatments for SCI-Related Detrusor Overactivity

There are other therapies reported to decrease neurogenic detrusor overactivity that have not been mentioned nor fit into the categories noted above. In particular, medications that have been traditionally used for treating spasticity of skeletal muscles in spinal cord injury, i.e., intrathecal baclofen and intrathecal clonidine, have been reported to be helpful in the area of decreasing spasticity of the bladder in the same population. Intrathecal therapy has been used since the early 1990’s for treating spasticity, and better spasticity control can be achieved with fewer systemic side effects as compared to oral administration.

Table 4 Intrathecal Baclofen and Clonidine for SCI-Related Detrusor Overactivity

Discussion

Chartier-Kastler et al. (2000) specifically used test bolus intrathecal injections of clonidine (ITC) to investigate its effects on SCI neurogenic detrusor overactivity, in patients otherwise resistant to a combination of oral treatment and self-clean intermittent catheterization (SCIC).  After the test bolus injection, 6 of 9 subjects elected to have permanent pump implantation for the treatment of severe detrusor overactivity.  Further confirmatory study of this proposed alternative treatment is needed as the sample size was small and no objective outcome measures were used.

Steers et al. (1992) investigated the use of intrathecal baclofen (ITB) specifically for the treatment of genitourinary function in 10 SCI patients with severe spasticity.  Compared with placebo, involuntary bladder contraction induced incontinence was eliminated and 1 patient was able to convert from indwelling urethral catheterization to intermittent self-catheterization.  Bladder capacity was increased by a mean of 72% while detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia was eliminated in 50% of patients. These authors recommend the use of ITB for SCI genitourinary dysfunction when oral pharmacological interventions are insufficient to improve bladder function.  However, in light of the documented effectiveness of Botulinum toxin described above, the relative ease and temporary nature of treatment with Botulinum toxin, and the absence of significant adverse effects, it is unlikely that clinicians would chose intrathecal treatments over toxin therapy except in cases when intrathecal therapy is required for other problems (eg. spasticity).

Conclusion

  • There is level 1 evidence from a single small RCT (n=10) that intrathecal baclofen may be beneficial for bladder function improvement in individuals with SCI when oral pharmacological interventions are insufficient.
  • Level 4 evidence is available from a single, small (n=9), case series study for the use of intra-thecal clonidine to improve detrusor overactivity in individuals with SCI when a combination of oral treatment and sterile intermittent catheterization are insufficient.
  • Intrathecal baclofen and clonidine may be beneficial for bladder function improvement but further confirmatory evidence is needed.

Enhancing Bladder Volumes Non-Pharmacologically

Electrical Stimulation to Enhance Bladder Volumes

Electrical stimulation, most notably anterior sacral root stimulation, has been used to enhance bladder volume and induce voiding (Egon et al. 1998; Brindley et al. 1982). Typically, this approach has involved concomitant dorsal sacral rhizotomy and implantation of a sacral nerve stimulator. The combined effect of this is a more compliant bladder with more storage capacity under lower pressure and triggered voiding resulting in reduced incontinence, without the need to catheterize. As the focus of many of the studies involving electrical stimulation is on both of these functions (i.e., increased bladder capacity and control of bladder emptying), we will describe the evidence for these and other methods of electrical stimulation for improving bladder outcomes in a single subsequent subsection (see Section 13.3.4.7 Electrical Stimulation for Bladder Emptying (and Enhancing Volumes)).

Surgical Augmentation of the Bladder to Enhance Volume

Bladder augmentation or augmentation cystoplasty is a surgical repair to the bladder typically suggested when conservative approaches such as anticholinergics with intermittent catheterization have failed to create an adequate bladder volume under low pressure for storage (Chartier-Kastler et al. 2000; Quek & Ginsberg 2003) Intolerable incontinence, renal deterioration, and/or local erosions or infections related to the use of catheters are common final pathways that may lead the clinician to consider definitive urological surgery. There are several approaches that have been described in the SCI literature with a common method being variations of the “clam-shell” ileocystoplasty in which the bladder is opened up like a clam and isolated intestine (ileum) are patched in to create a larger bladder (Chartier-Kastler et al. 2000; Nomura et al. 2002; Quek & Ginsberg 2003). Surgical techniques that are focused on urinary diversion away from the bladder and subsequent drainage (e.g., cutaneous ileal conduit diversion) are discussed in the section on incontinent urinary diversion in the section that is focused on drainage (see 13.3.4.6 Continent Catheterizable Stoma and Incontinent Urinary Diversion).

Table 5 Surgical Augmentation of the Bladder to Enhance Volume

Discussion

As is the case for most surgical approaches, the evidence for surgical augmentation of the bladder exists in the form of clinical experience from individual centres as is described in retrospective chart reviews (e.g., Nomura et al. 2002; Quek & Ginsberg 2003) or more rarely may be found in prospective studies that are limited to non-controlled, non-randomized pre-post (cohort) study designs (e.g., Chartier-Kastler et al. 2000). Long-term retrospective results associated with ileocystoplasty in persons with traumatic and non-traumatic SCI (or spina bifida) were reported over a mean period of 5.5 and 8 years by Nomura et al. (2002) (n=21) and Quek and Ginsberg (2003) (n=26) respectively. Chartier-Kastler et al. (2000) conducted a prospective evaluation of 17 persons with traumatic longstanding SCI who underwent enterocystoplasty (i.e., ileocystoplasty) with systematic follow-up at 1, 3, 6, 12 months and then yearly for a mean follow-up of 6.3 years. In all cases, this was conducted in individuals with overactive bladder and/or detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia with reflex incontinence which failed to respond to conservative treatment. Across all these studies at each follow-up, bladder capacity increased dramatically with near or complete resolution of incontinence in the vast majority of patients. Chartier-Kastler et al. (2000) conducted systematic urodynamic investigations and showed a significant increase in maximal cystometric capacity by 191% (174.1 to 508.1 ml, p<0.05) with a concomitant decrease in maximal filling pressure of 72% (65.5 60 18.3 cm H2O, p<0.05). These results are similar to those reported by Nomura et al. (2002) and Quek and Ginsberg (2003). No serious complications were noted across the studies, and other complications were noted in only a few individuals (e.g., transient paralytic ileus, vesicoureteral reflux, wound infection, urethral stricture of unknown cause, recurrent pyelonephritis possibly due to non-compliance with intermittent catheterization and use of Crede maneuver) with the vast majority of these responding well to conservative treatment (Chartier-Kastler et al. 2000; Nomura et al. 2002; Quek & Ginsberg 2003). Subsequent subjective assessment of patient satisfaction with the procedure was reported to be extremely high (Quek & Ginsberg 2003) which is consistent with other similar investigations in SCI patients (Khastgir et al. 2003). Reyblat et al (2009), in a retrospective chart review, reported equivocal postoperative continence using a extraperitoneal vs the standard intraperitoneal augmentation.  However, the extraperitoneal group had shorter operative times, shorter lengths of stay, sooner return of bowel function and no difference in complication rates.  There was a potential for selection bias in this study that was mitigated with a subgroup analysis in an effort to control for a significant confounding variable of higher rates of prior abdominal surgery in the intraperitoneal group.

Conclusions

  • There is level 4 evidence from three studies that surgical augmentation of bladder (ileocystoplasty) may result in enhanced bladder capacity under lower filling pressure and improved continence in persons with SCI who previously did not respond well to conservative approaches for overactive bladder.
  • There is level 3 evidence from a single study that extraperitoneal (vs intraperitoneal) augmentation enterocystoplasty produces equivocal postoperative continence with easier early postoperative recovery.
  • Surgical augmentation of bladder may result in enhanced bladder capacity under lower filling pressure and improved continence in persons with SCI.
  • Extraperitoneal vs intraperitoneal augmentation enterocystoplasty may result in better postoperative recovery.

Enhancing Bladder Emptying Pharmacologically

As noted previously, normal voiding process occurs through a pathway between the pontine and sacral micturition centers. These centers work synergistically to allow for bladder storage or drainage. However, in individuals with SCI lesions this process can be interrupted. This causes impairment of voiding function which can be classified into two categories: impairment in storing and impairment in emptying (Hanno 2001). 

Enhancing bladder storage, as discussed earlier in the chapter, involves relaxing the detrusor muscle and allowing for increased bladder volumes. Individuals with impairment of bladder emptying are those whose sphincter is unable to relax or who have weak or nonexistent detrusor muscle contractions, both causing failure to empty.  These individuals can be treated pharmacologically with oral alpha adrenergic blockers and botulinum toxin (injected into the sphincter). Both interventions are intended to improve voiding but also may increase the tendency towards incontinence, a point not highlighted in the studies presented below. However, in those male patients who already have incontinence, and are using condom drainage, but have persistently elevated residuals, alpha blockers or Botulinum toxin (injected into the sphincter) may result in more complete emptying.

Alpha-adrenergic Blockers for Bladder Emptying

A variety of alpha adrenergic blockers have been used to treat SCI bladder dysfunction.  These drugs have been used to target alpha adrenoreceptor blocker subtypes which may be implicated in a variety of mechanisms including bladder neck dysfunction, increased bladder outlet resistance, detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia, autonomic hyperreflexia or upper tract stasis.

Table 6 Summary of Alpha Adrenergic Blockers

Discussion

Tamsulosin is an alpha1 adrenoreceptor antagonist that has been used to treat SCI bladder neck dysfunction by causing smooth muscles in the bladder neck to relax and improve urine flow rate. A large scale (n=263) RCT conducted by Abrams et al. (2003), provided evidence for increased micturition frequency and improvement in urinary leakage parameters for individuals with SCI. This study consisted of a 4 week RCT followed by a longer-term open-label period conducted over a year in persons with overactive bladder with or without dyssynergia. Maximal urethral pressure determined via urethral pressure profilometry was reduced significantly with the longer-term trial (p<0.001) although only a trend was apparent during the one month RCT with 0.4 mg dose (p=0.183) but not with a dose of 0.8 mg (p=0.443). In the 1 year open-label investigation tamsulosin also was associated with several improved cystometry parameters related to bladder storage and emptying, and also resulted in increased mean voided volume values as reported in a patient diary. Given that most positive outcomes were more apparent with the open-label phase, which consisted of a pre-post trial design, this trial has been assigned as level 4 evidence.

Moxisylyte is an alpha adrenoreceptor blocker used commonly in the treatment of Raynaud’s disease where narrowing of the blood vessels in the hands causes numbness and pain in the fingers. Costa et al. (1993) in an n=20 RCT investigated the off-label use of moxisylyte in the treatment of SCI bladder neck dysfunction.  With its smooth muscle relaxant property, the decrease in urethral closure pressure was found to be dose related and significant when compared to placebo, with the maximum reduction of 47.6% occurring at 10 minutes after 0.75mg/kg in individuals with SCI.

Terazosin is often used to treat hypertension. However, this alpha-adrenergic blocker is also useful in treating bladder neck dysfunction by relaxing the bladder neck muscles and easing the voiding process. Perkash (1995) reported that although 82% of patients (N=28), with absent detrusor sphincter dyssynergia, perceived improvement in voiding; only 42% registered meaningful objective decreases in maximum urodynamic voiding pressure. Side effects, tolerance and required subsequent urodynamic monitoring may be deterrents to the wide-spread adoption of terazosin as an alternative treatment for bladder neck dysfunction in SCI individuals.  The specificity of terazosin action on the bladder neck, exclusive of the external sphincter, was demonstrated by Chancellor et al. (1993) in a subgroup of SCI patients who had persistent voiding difficulty after previous sphinterotomy subsequent to failed initial terazosin treatment.

Phenoxybenzamine is an antihypertensive usually chosen to treat autonomic symptoms of pheochromocytomas such as high blood pressure or excess sweating.  Al-Ali et al. (1999) undertook to utilize the autonomic effects of phenoxybenzamine to treat bladder dysfunction which is in part under autonomic control.  Treatment with phenoxybenzamine (n=46 with 41 completers), resulted in a reduction of bladder outlet resistance, detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia or autonomic hyperreflexia in some subjects while no benefits were recorded for areflexive bladders.  Phenoxybenzamine can be beneficial as an adjunct treatment for neuropathic bladder following SCI, when tapping or crede is unable to achieve satisfactory residual urine volumes of < 100 mL.  The lack of efficacy in those with bladder neck dysfunction was specifically noted in this study.  Since statistically significant results were not reported in this study, further appropriately sized RCTs would be helpful in providing sufficient evidence for the use of phenoxybenzamine in the treatment of SCI neuropathic bladder.

The pyelouretheral smooth muscle responsible for urethral peristalsis and movement of the urine from the kidneys to the bladder via the ureters is also a potential site of action for alpha 1-receptor antagonist therapy.  Linsenmeyer et al. (2002), in a small (n=10) retrospective chart review found that in men with upper tract (i.e. kidneys and ureters) stasis secondary to SCI at or above T6, 6 months of alpha1-blocker therapy provided improvement in upper tract stasis in 80% of subjects who used reflex voiding to manage their bladder as measured by significant decreases of the duration of uninhibited bladder contractions.  Firm conclusions about effectiveness and the optimum duration of treatment can only be validated with further RCT trials.

Conclusion

  • Level 1 evidence from a single study suggests that moxisylyte decreases maximum urethral closure pressure by 47.6% at 10 minutes after an optimum dose of 0.75mg/kg in individuals with SCI.
  • There is level 4 evidence from a single study that suggests that tamsulosin may improve bladder neck relaxation and subsequent urine flow in SCI individuals. 
  • There is level 4 evidence (two studies, n=28 & 9) that  supports terazosin as an alternative treatment for bladder neck dysfunction in SCI individuals provided that side effects and drug tolerance are monitored.
  • There is level 4 evidence derived from a single, case series study involving 46 subjects (41 completers) that indicates some potential for phenoxybenzamine as an adjunct treatment for neuropathic bladder following SCI, when tapping or crede is insufficient to achieve residual urine volume of <100mL. Further evidence is required.
  • Level 4 evidence from 1 small retrospective chart review suggests that 6 months of alpha 1-blocker therapy may improve upper tract stasis secondary to SCI in men by decreasing the duration of involuntary bladder contractions.
  • Tamsulosin may improve urine flow in SCI individuals with bladder neck dysfunction.
  • Mosixylyte is likely able to decrease maximum urethral closure pressure at a dose of 0.75mg/kg in individuals with SCI.
  • Terazosin may be an alternative treatment for bladder neck dysfunction in individuals with SCI. but side effects and drug tolerance should be monitored.
  • Phenoxybenzamine may be useful as an adjunct therapy for reducing residual urine volume in SCI neuropathic bladders maintained by crede or tapping.
  • Six months of alpha 1-blocker therapy in male SCI patients may improve upper tract stasis.

Botulinum Toxin for Bladder Emptying

Botulinum toxin is an exotoxin produced by the bacteria Clostridium botulinum. As noted previously (see 3.1.2 Toxin therapy for SCI-related Detrusor Overactivity), it has been used for many conditions associated with muscular overactivity and specifically for neurogenic detrusor overactivity. In SCI individuals with sphincter overactivity causing drainage impairment, botulinum toxin may also be administered into the external urethral sphincter causing the muscle to relax resulting in improved drainage (deSeze et al. 2002). The toxin works by inhibiting acetylcholine release at the neuromuscular junction and relaxing the muscle, an effect that gradually wears off over the months following injection. Improving emptying and if possible eliminating the need for catheterizing may be a goal for some individuals with neurogenic bladder treated by injections of botulinum toxin A into the sphincter, provided unwanted incontinence or more serious urological complications do not develop. 

Table 7 Bladder Emptying through Botulinum Toxin

Discussion

DESD and associated high bladder pressures, vesicoureteral reflux, and frequent UTI are associated with poor outcomes. Patients may develop upper tract deterioration and/or suffer incontinence and poor quality of life.  Injection into the external urethra with botulinum toxin has been shown to reduce bladder pressures, improve incidence of UTI, and in some patients, normalize bladder emptying (Tsai et al. 2009, Kuo 2008).  The important impact of increased incontinence after sphincter injection, along with urodynamic parameters were studied by Kuo.  While this author cautions that QoL can decrease due to the increased incontinence experienced by some individuals, careful patient selection may allow some to benefit from the clearly evident improvement in urodynamic parameters and UTI incidence. Tsai et al. (2009) showed statistically significant improvement in quality of life post injection, but did not reveal data on incontinence. 

The improvement found in post voiding residual volume demonstrated by the Kuo and Tsai studies was initially shown in the study by deSeze et al. (2002) who conducted a randomized, controlled, double blind study using lidocaine as a control injection (n=8) and botulinum toxin as a treatment (n=5).  This study found BTx improved post void residual volume in individuals with SCI significantly better than lidocaine. One month after BTx was injected into the external sphincter, post-voiding residual volume decreased significantly by 159.4 mL to 105.0 mL and all patients who previously presented with autonomic dysreflexia no longer possessed symptoms. 

Other studies also showed a decrease in autonomic hyperreflexia symptoms in at least 60% of patients (Tsai et al. 2009, Kuo 2008, Dykstra et al. 1988; Dykstra & Sidi 1990; Petit et al. 1998; Schurch et al.1996).  Almost all patients showed sphincter denervation on electromyography; resulting in temporary relief of these symptoms for about 2-3 months and the need for subsequent BTx injections to maintain results (Dykstra et al. 1988; Dykstra & Sidi 1990).

Schurch et al. (1996) compared the effectiveness of transurethral versus transperineal botulinum toxin A injections through a prospective controlled study.  The study found that transurethral botulinum toxin injections were significantly more effective in reducing urethral pressure than transperineal injections. However, other symptoms were improved through either injection method. Tsai in 2009 described a method in which transperineal sphincter injections were done with fluoroscopic guidance and EMG which resulted in excellent effects on bladder emptying, with most patients returning to voiding, thus avoiding frequent intermittent catheterization, or in three patients, discontinuation of indwelling catheterization.

Schurch et al (1996) also revealed the additive effects of recurrent BTx injections resulting from prolonged inhibition of acetylcholine release.  After 3 monthly injections, the therapeutic effects of BTx lasted for as long as 9 months compared to only 2 – 3 months with 1 injection.

Phelan et al. (2001) were the first to demonstrate the successful use of botulinum toxin A in women.  This study which included 13 females showed that all but 1 patient was able to spontaneously void after botulinum A injection. Women often have greater difficulty performing self-catheterization than do men; therefore restoration of usual voiding as a result of sphincter injection with botulinum toxin may have an even more significant role in the urologic management of females with SCI.  More study on the long term outcome of “spontaneous voiding” after sphincter injection in women is required.

While not specifically mentioned in the above studies, a group of patients likely to benefit from injections of BTx into the sphincter are those men who have persistently elevated bladder volumes while using condom drainage.  Sometimes such patients have chosen condom drainage because of reluctance to perform self catheterization while other times this bladder drainage option is chosen because of persistent incontinence on intermittent catheterization regimes despite adequate trials of anticholinergic medication. These patients could theoretically benefit from improved drainage, as residual urine is a common cause of UTI, and can also accompany elevated bladder pressures, putting upper tracts at risk.  Whether or not such patients actually resume “voiding” allowing discontinuation of condom drainage altogether has not been addressed.

Botulinum toxin therapy has the advantage of avoiding major surgical procedures and their risks.  Botulinum toxin therapy injection relaxes the external sphincter resulting in a decrease in post-voiding residual urine volume, and in 70% of patients, acceptable voiding pressures (Tsai et al. 2009). This improvement further seems to result in decreasing other symptoms such as autonomic dysreflexia and UTI incidence. However, due to sphincter denervation, it has a disadvantage of requiring repeated injections to maintain its therapeutic results.  Also, post injection urodynamic studies should be done to prove that voiding pressures are in the acceptable range.  For those that do not experience unacceptable incontinence, botulinum toxin injection into the external sphincter is effective in assisting with bladder emptying for persons with neurogenic bladder due to SCI.  Whether or not the improved voiding pressure and UTI incidence results in better long term upper tract outcomes after recurrent sphincter injection requires further study.  Furthermore, the patient characteristics that would result in optimal benefit from sphincter injections without suffering unacceptable incontinence must be clarified in future studies in order for this technique to gain clinical acceptance.

Conclusion

  • There is level 1 evidence from a single RCT with support from several additional controlled and uncontrolled trials that botulinum toxin injected into the external urinary sphincter may be effective in improving outcomes associated with bladder emptying in persons with neurogenic bladder due to SCI.
  • Botulinum toxin injected into the sphincter is effective in assisting with bladder emptying for persons with neurogenic bladder due to SCI.

Enhancing Bladder Emptying Non-Pharmacologically

Comparing Methods of Conservative Bladder Emptying

Bladder emptying must be conducted under low pressure conditions in order to prevent upper urinary tract complications which may lead to renal failure. The choice of bladder management method must also result in continence, be acceptable to the individual with neurogenic bladder, and facilitate the greatest independence. During rehabilitation, most people with SCI are evaluated for the most suitable bladder management technique, taught how to manage the chosen method, and are advised as to complications and alternatives. In order to counsel patients appropriately, it is helpful for the clinician to understand the data related to bladder management method and complications.  The section below reviews several papers that review the outcome of groups of patients treated with the most commonly chosen conservative methods of bladder management.  Further papers addressing outcomes are included in the indwelling and intermittent catheterization sections. 

Management methods presented to the patient initially are based on clinical problems – eg. Incomplete emptying, incontinence, dysreflexia, etc. and on the functional ability of the patient – and can be influenced by the frequency of UTI.  The conservative methods for bladder management include the following: Intermittent catheterization, indwelling urethral catheterization, or condom catheterization (males only). If bladder function permits, spontaneous “triggered” or expression voiding without the need for an external drainage system may also be an option, although the disadvantages with these approaches have been outlined in a review (Wyndaele et al. 2001).  Suprapubic catheterization is occasionally chosen in the subacute period as there is no disturbance to the urethra.  However, the complication rate remains high, added to the invasiveness of the technique and thus it is rarely chosen early after SCI, though often becomes an option in the chronic period.  Urodynamic studies provide information on bladder storage and emptying pressure, and on the presence of reflux, and are essential in the management of the patient, influencing the choice of bladder management method.  Whether or not patients change their bladder management method and why is also a topic of importance. Green (2004), Drake et al. (2005), and Yavuser et al. (2000), address this issue, listing some of the common complications as reason for change:  frequent UTI’s, upper tract deterioration, increased post void residual urine volume, bladder or kidney stones, functional decline and patient request. The section below presents data on retrospective studies which attempt to clarify the type and incidence of complications associated with the above methods of bladder management. For the most part, these approaches are considered in advance of other options involving bladder augmentation surgery or stimulator implantation, subjects of later sections.

Table 8 Comparison Studies of Conservative Bladder Emptying

Discussion

Several authors have examined the frequency of a variety of urological and renal complications associated with various forms of chronic bladder management (Ord et al. 2003; Weld & Dmochowski 2000; Hackler 1982). These authors have all employed retrospective chart reviews to examine complication rates associated with long-term follow-up data. In general, these authors concur that the greatest numbers of complications occur with long-term use of indwelling suprapubic and urethral catheters. In particular, of these investigations, Weld and Dmochowski (2000) employed a large sample (N=357) and examined the greatest range of complications. These authors noted that long-term urethral catheterization was associated with the largest overall number of complications, with long-term suprapubic catheterization ranked next. Depending on the specific complication, one of these two methods was associated with the highest incidence. Urethral catheter users had the highest rates for epididymitis, pyelonephritis, upper tract stones, bladder stones, urethral strictures and periurethral abscess. Suprapubic catheter users had the highest rates for vesicoureteral reflux and abnormal upper tracts. It should be noted that these authors did not account for changing bladder management methods, preferring to simplify the analysis by classifying the results by the most predominate bladder management method.

Ord et al. (2003), on the other hand, also examined a relatively large dataset (n=467) but examined all the combinations of changing methods. However, these authors limited their analysis to the effect of various bladder management techniques on the risk of bladder stone formation. Similar to Weld and Dmochowski (2000), these authors also found a slightly greater incidence of bladder stones for indwelling urethral catheters as compared to suprapubic catheters with each much greater than for intermittent catheterization. Ord et al. (2003) reported, hazard ratios relative to intermittent catheterization of 10.5 for suprapubic catheters and 12.8 for indwelling urethral catheters. In contrast, Hackler (1982) reported comparisons between long-term complication rates among those with condom (Texas), urethral (Foley) and suprapubic catheterization and found markedly higher rates for those managed with suprapubic catheters even though the follow-up period for these patients was only 5 years as compared to 20 years for those managed with the other 2 methods. However, these findings reflected a much smaller series of patients (N=31) and the comparisons were made from patients from different time periods reflecting different “generations” of care.

It should be noted that even though the data favor intermittent catheterization or triggered spontaneous voiding, it is not always possible to use these methods. Lack of independence in catheterizing can limit the use of intermittent catheterization in tetraplegics and in women, while spontaneous voiding may not be possible given the state of bladder function (Yavuzer et al. 2000).  While every effort is made to start patients on intermittent catheter programs, some patients change to other methods in the post injury period. Drake et al. (2005) reports a 28.8% incidence in change of bladder management method, while Yavuzer et al. (2000) found that up to 60% of patients changed from intermittent to indwelling catheter use. In Green’s Model System’s study (2004), only 25% changed to indwelling catheters over 15 years. The primary reasons indicated for changing methods were a greater dependence on care-givers than originally thought, presence of severe spasticity, incontinence and inconvenience with intermittent catheterization (females only). Thus assisting patients in choosing the most optimal method of bladder management is important, while if less optimal methods of management are decided on during the years post injury, appropriate or increased surveillance must continue, given the described complication rates.  

Conclusion

  • There is level 4 evidence that indwelling urethral catheterization is associated with a higher rate of acute urological complications than intermittent catheterization.
  • There is level 4 evidence that prolonged indwelling catheterization, whether suprapubic or urethral, may result in a higher long-term rate of urological and renal complications than intermittent catheterization, condom catheterization or triggered spontaneous voiding.
  • There is level 4 evidence that intermittent catheterization, whether performed acutely or chronically, has the lowest complication rate.
  • Results are conflicting about the complications associated with chronic use of spontaneous triggered voiding but some authors present level 4 evidence that this method has comparable long-term complication rates to intermittent catheterization.
  • There is level 4 evidence that those who use intermittent catheterization at discharge from rehabilitation may have difficulty continuing, especially those with tetraplegia and complete injuries. Females also have more difficulty than males in maintaining compliance with IC procedures.
  • Intermittent catheterization, whether performed acutely or chronically, has the lowest complication rate.
  • Indwelling catheterization, whether suprapubic or urethral or whether conducted acutely or chronically, may result in a higher long-term rate of urological and renal complications than other management methods.
  • Persons with tetraplegia and complete injuries and to a lesser degree females may have difficulty in maintaining compliance with intermittent catheterization procedures following discharge from rehabilitation.

Intermittent Catheterization

Intermittent catheterization is the preferred method of bladder management which is associated with a reduced incidence of renal impairment, reflux, stone disease, bladder cancer and possibly UTI than other methods of bladder management (Groah et al. 2002; Weld & Dmochowski 2000; Ord et al. 2003). The present section outlines those studies focusing on specific aspects of intermittent catheterization, including timing of catheterization and catheter selection, (Polliack et al. 2005; Waller et al. 1997; De Ridder et al. 2005; Giannantoni et al. 2001; Kovindha et al. 2004). Effectiveness of intermittent catheterization in emptying the bladder is addressed in Jensen et al. (1995).  Data on long-term follow-up of patients managed by intermittent catheterization is provided in the articles by Ku et al. (2006), Perrouin-verbe et al. (1995) and Nanninga et al. (1982).

Table 9 Intermittent Catheterization

Discussion

Intermittent catheterization is the mode of bladder management generally associated with the fewest long term complications (Groah et al. 2002; Weld & Dmochowski 2000; Ord et al. 2003).  However, there are some complications that occur with higher frequency in patients who intermittently catheterize.  Urethral complications (19% incidence) may lead to urosepsis and epididymorchitis (28.5% incidence) which may result in increased morbidity and reduced fertility, all occuring at a higher frequency in those who use intermittent catheterization (Ku et al. 2006).  However, there is good consensus among the larger retrospective studies available that intermittent catheterization programs protect the upper urinary tract by allowing regular emptying with low bladder pressures (Giannantoni et al. 2001).  Episodes of pylonephritis and UTI are also reduced when bladder emptying is conducted consistently and completely in the absence of indwelling catheters (Groah et al. 2002; Weld & Dmochowski 2000; Ord et al. 2003; Giannantoni et al. 2001). Perrouin-Verbe et al. (1995) showed that patients most likely to continue with intermittent catheterization would be those who are able to independently catheterize and those who have an acceptable level of continence. Thus it is essential to consider an individual’s activities of daily living, psychological factors and potential caregiving needs when intermittent catheterizationis being introduced early after SCI.

A very low incidence of bladder stones and hydronephrosis were reported in Perouin-Verbe et al. (1995) (2%), consistent with previously discussed studies. However, Nanninga et al. (1982), reported  upper tract changes in 33% of patients. While this range is large, it is possible that management of patients in 1982 involved less stringent control of high bladder pressures, the cause of upper tract disease in many cases (Nanninga et al. 1982). Nanninga noted that high bladder pressures may occur even in the setting of patients who remain continent or nearly so between catheterizations, and that the problem can at least be partially avoided by increasing the frequency of catheterization. Other options for patients with persistently elevated pressures already on intermittent catheterization programs are detrusor Botox injections and/or anticholinergic medications.  It is important to note that regular follow-up of these patients including tests of bladder physiology and upper tract function is recommended to monitor for changes and for increasing incidence of complications with time (Perrouin-Verb et al. 1995; Nanninga et al. 1982). 

There are several trials investigating varying properties of catheters used for IC (De Ridder et al. 2005; Giannantoni et al. 2001; Waller et al. 1997). For example, Giannantoni et al. (2001) demonstrated a reduction in the incidence of UTIs and in the presence of asymptomatic bacteriuria for a pre-lubricated catheter vs a conventional PVC catheter. Of note are 3 subjects initially requiring assistance with the conventional catheter transitioning to independence with the pre-lubricated catheter. However, it was not reported if these individuals were in the group using the conventional catheter initially or lastly. In terms of general satisfaction, subjects rated the pre-lubricated catheter significantly higher than the conventional catheter with respect to comfort, ease of insertion, extraction, and handling. Reduced incidence of UTIs was reported by De Ridder et al. (2005) in favour of hydrophilic catheters when compared to conventional PVC catheters. Although this multi-centre investigation employed a RCT design (N=123) results should be cautiously interpreted given a drop-out rate of 54%. A third investigation examining catheter properties investigated the effect of osmolality on two different hydrophilic catheters. Waller et al. (1997) demonstrated reduced friction with the high-osmality catheter vs the other, a finding corroborated by nursing reports of fewer catheter “stickings”. These differences did not translate into clinically significant results for differences in the incidence of UTIs with either catheter.  Finally, a study by Kovindha et al. (2004), provides data on a reusable (average of 3 years of usage) silicone catheter. The frequency of UTIs reported for the reuseable catheter is comparable to that reported for standard disposable catheters (3-7 days of usage), but inferior to frequencies reported for prelubricated catheters. Kovindha et al. (2004) stated that the long-term silicone catheter is an economical option for those in developing countries. In developing countries, the high cost of the single use, prelubricated catheters is prohibitive outside of exceptional situations.

It should be noted that some assistive devices that may enhance compliance with intermittent catheterizationfor those with impaired hand function do exist, although these are likely not in widespread use. For example, Adler and Kirshblum (2003) reported a series of 9 individuals with C5-C7 SCI, originally unable to perform intermittent catheterizationthat were subsequently satisfied and successful with a device to help performance of intermittent catheterization. 

Conclusion

  • There is Level 1 evidence based on 1 RCT that pre-lubricated hydrophilic catheters are associated with fewer UTIs and reduced incidence of urethral bleeding and microtrauma as compared to conventional Poly Vinyl Chloride catheters.
  • There is Level 2 evidence based on 1 RCT that fewer UTIs, but not necessarily urethral bleeding may result with the use of hydrophilic catheters as compared to conventional PVC catheters.
  • There is level 4 evidence that urethral complications and epididymoorchitis occurs more frequently in those using IC programs for bladder emptying, but the advantages of improved upper tract outcome over those with indwelling catheters outweigh these disadvantages.
  • There is level 4 evidence that using a portable ultrasound device reduces the frequency and cost of intermittent catheterizations.
  • Although both pre-lubricated and hydrophilic catheters have been associated with reduced incidence of UTIs as compared to conventional Poly Vinyl Chloride catheters, less urethral microtrauma with their use may only be seen with pre-lubricated catheters.
  • Urethral complications and epididymoorchitis occurs more frequently in those using IC programs.
  • Portable ultrasound device can improve the scheduling of intermittent catheterizations.

Triggering-Type or Expression Voiding Methods of Bladder Management

Individuals with SCI undergoing inpatient rehabilitation are sometimes taught various maneuvers in order to initiate or attempt spontaneous voiding, termed “expression voiding” as well as to provide a “trigger” to initiate voiding (Wyndaele et al. 2001). As noted previously, these involve methods to increase intra-abdominal pressure so as to facilitate voiding. Only 1 study examining these methods met the criteria for inclusion in the present review.

Table 10 Triggering-Type or Expression Voiding Methods

Discussion

Greenstein et al. (1992) documented the use of Valsalva and Crede maneuvers to initiate spontaneous voiding in a small case series of 5 males with paraplegia. Wyndaele et al. (2001) states in his review, that bladder “voiding” by this method utilizes C-fibre activation which triggers the sacral reflex resulting in involuntary and non-sustained bladder contraction.  Wyndaele et al. (2001) cautions readers that DESD may occur in a high percentage of patients who can activate bladder emptying in this manner, resulting in the potential for upper tract changes, as well as incomplete emptying.  The study by Greenstein et al. was intended to examine the potential for long-term complications in those who employed these techniques over an extended period of time. High intravesical pressure was documented during voiding.  The authors suggested that long-term monitoring for these individuals is advisable and intermittent catheterization should replace these methods in the event of urological complications.  Triggered voiding and use of the crede maneuver to initiate “voiding” should only be considered in patients with normal upper tracts, provided that urodynamic studies demonstrate low pressure storage and “voiding”, and that there is a low incidence of UTI.

Conclusion

  • There is level 4 evidence that triggering mechanisms such as the Valsalva or Crede maneuvers may assist some individuals with neurogenic bladder in emptying their bladders without catheterization. However, high intra-vesical voiding pressures can occur which could conceivably lead to renal complications.
  • Valsalva or Crede maneuver may assist some individuals to void spontaneously but produce high intra-vesical pressure, increasing the risk for long-term complications.

Indwelling Catheterization (Indwelling or Suprapubic)

Urethral catheterization may be the bladder management method of choice for a variety of reasons including the following: ease of management, inadequate hand function for IC, severe spasticity, low bladder capacity with high detrusor pressures and/or persistent incontinence especially in women, and pressure ulcers (Yavuzer et al. 2000). Suprapubic catheterization, first described in SCI by Cook and Smith (1976), is the preferred choice for those patients who require an indwelling catheter but have severe urethral disease. Weld and Dmochowski (2000) presented data showing a lower overall complication rate from suprapubic catheter use than from urethral catheter use (44.4 % vs 53% respectively). Since indwelling catheterization is sometimes unavoidable, becoming familiar with the various potential complications and appropriate monitoring is important for managing neurogenic bladder.

Based on a series of case review studies (most described earlier in Section 13.4.3.1) comparing various bladder management methods, long-term use of indwelling catheters are associated with generally higher rates of complications (Wyndaele et al. 1985; Gallien et al. 1998; Weld & Dmochowski 2000) than other methods (especially IC). For example, Ord et al. (2003) noted a significantly greater chance of having bladder stones with long-term suprapubic catheter or urethral indwelling catheter use as indicated by hazard ratios of 10.5 and 12.8 relative to intermittent catheterization respectively. Indwelling catheterization has also been linked to significantly higher rates of bladder cancer development (Groah et al. 2002; Kaufman et al. 1977) and upper tract deterioration (Weld & Dmochowski 2000) as compared to those who use long-term intermittent catheterization.

Table 11 Indwelling Catheterization

Discussion

Although IC is the first choice for neurogenic bladder management, some patients with subacute SCI are managed with indwelling catheters due to prolonged high urine output states, frequent intercurrent medical illnesses or surgical complications, or severe incontinence.  Suprapubic catheterization is occasionally considered during this early period if urethral damage has occurred due to prolonged urethral catheter use.  Later, in chronic situations, suprapubic catheterization may also be favored by individuals with SCI in the case of obesity, severe lower extremity spasticity, inadequate hand function, persistent incontinence, urethral stricture or erosion, or because of perceived increased ability to engage in sexual relations (Weld & Dmochowski 2000; Peatfield et al.1983). Prostatitis and orchiepidymitis occur less frequently in those with suprapubic catheterization but upper tract deterioration remains a concern (Gallien et al. 1998; Weld & Dmochowski 2000; Sugimura et al. 2008). 

Hackler (1982) has suggested that upper tract deterioration may be reduced with concomitant use of anticholinergic medication.  MacDiarmid et al. (1995) hypothesized that clinical factors may also reduce the complication rate. They attributed the low incidence of complications during the year long data collection period to strict adherence to a catheter protocol with regular follow-up and close surveillance with a dedicated medical and nursing team and informed primary care practitioners. Sugimura et al. (2008) also noted that upper tract complication rates with suprapubic catheterization may be lower than earlier studies suggested and reported a renal complication rate of 13.4% associated with a mean follow-up period of 68 months. Furthermore, Sherriff et al. (1998) conducted a satisfaction survey regarding suprapubic catheter use which indicated 70-90% satisfaction based on questions such as impact on life, pleasure with the switch, and “would you do it again”, etc.

Several of the studies described above on suprapubic catheterization contain a relatively short follow-up period (e.g., < 10 years).  The specific concerns regarding indwelling catheter use centre on the potential for urological complications with long-term use.  Many patients are injured as young adults, and may live for greater than 50 years and therefore the target for safety monitoring regarding bladder management choice should emulate SCI life expectancy.  According to the prospective study by Kaufman et al. (1977), the risk of bladder cancer with indwelling urethral catheters increase significantly with duration of use. Interestingly, his data suggest that routine screening with bladder biopsy may be indicated in addition to cystoscopy for those at highest risk of bladder cancer.  His study did not include a significant number of suprapubic catheter users, but Groah et al. (2002) did include both types of indwelling catheter users, and clearly showed a higher incidence of bladder cancer in such patients compared to those not managing their bladders with indwelling catheters.  Stone disease, upper tract deterioration, reflux, and chronic infection remain additional long term concerns in those who resort to indwelling catheter use, with a slightly lower overall incidence reported in those with suprapubic vs. urethral catheters (Weld & Dmochowski 2000).

Conclusion

  • There is level 4 evidence that despite a significant incidence of urological and renal complications associated with acute and chronic indwelling suprapubic catheterization, this may still a reasonable choice for bladder management for people with poor hand function, lack of care-giver assistance, severe lower limb spasticity, urethral disease, and persistent incontinence with urethral catheterization.
  • There is level 4 evidence that those with indwelling catheters are at higher risk for bladder cancer than those with non-indwelling catheter management programs.  Screening for cancer may require routine biopsy as well as cystoscopy.
  • With diligent care and ongoing medical follow-up, indwelling suprapubic catheterization may be an effective and satisfactory bladder management choice for some people, though there is insufficient evidence to report lifelong safety of such a regime.
  • Indwelling catheter users are at higher risk of bladder cancer, especially in the second decade of use, though risk also increases during the first decade of use.

Condom Catheterization

A viable option for bladder management in males is condom catheterization. As noted above, condom catheterization is associated with relatively fewer complications than indwelling methods but more than IC (Ord et al. 2003; Hackler 1982). However, complications may still arise, as described by Newman & Price 1985). Of greatest concern is incomplete drainage, which may be accompanied by persistently high bladder pressures, recurrent UTIs and the likelihood of glomerular filtration rate deterioration described below. Sometimes this situation necessitates adjuvant daily or twice daily catheterization, medications, or sphincterotomy.  Medications to improve draining, such as alpha blockers can improve emptying by reducing outlet resistance, and sometimes by reducing pressures. Newman & Price (1985) raise practical issues such as cleanliness and proper use of appliances.  One issue with condom catheterization is the difficulty by which they may be applied, especially in the event of impaired hand function. Slippage of the condom can result in leaks.  Perkash et al. (1992) describe the use of penile implants, in part as a means to circumvent this issue with condom application.

Table 12 Condom Catheterization

Discussion

Condom drainage is often chosen to deal with persistent incontinence which may occur with other methods of bladder management. However, complete emptying remains key, as emphasized by Newman and Price (1985) following a review of 60 SCI patients with external catheters, stating that bladder “residuals” should be checked periodically. Elevated residuals should raise the possibility of excessive bladder pressure, as incomplete emptying often occurs because of a spastic sphincter. This is a situation that can easily be assessed by urodynamic studies. Though Newman and Price (1985) indicated a high prevalence of bladder trabeculation, and implied that this occurred secondary to high pressure, no urodynamic data was provided. Sphincterotomy is a surgical procedure that eliminates outlet resistance and one that almost 30% of the study group in Newman and Price (1985) had undergone.  Another problem commonly described with condom drainage is infection.  It is difficult to make conclusions in this area based on the rather generalized description of a positive culture (“any organism growing”) as presented by Newman and Price (1985). 

Some patients prefer condom drainage for convenience, as there is usually no or reduced need to catheterize, compared to regimes that involve sole use of clean intermittent catheterization. However, this convenience can be offset by accidental leaks, and skin problems at the site of condom attachment.  Perkash et al. (1992) conducted a retrospective analysis of 79 male patients with penile implants in place over a mean time of 7.08 years. A primary reason for obtaining a penile implant in these patients, among others, was to provide a stable penile shaft to hold a condom for external urinary drainage. In addition, penile implantation allowed some to switch to a more effective and safer bladder management method (i.e. 18% no longer required an indwelling catheter). All patients reported improved continence as reflected in the general observation that it was easier to keep themselves clean and dry.

Conclusion

  • There is level 4 evidence that condom drainage can be associated with urinary tract infection and upper tract deterioration.
  • There is level 4 evidence that penile implants may allow easier use of condom catheters, thereby reducing incontinence and improving sexual function.
  • Patients using condom drainage should be monitored for complete emptying and for low pressure drainage, to reduce UTI and upper tract deterioration. Sphincterotomy may eventually be required.
  • Penile implants may allow easier use of condom catheters and reduce incontinence.

Continent Catheterizable Stoma and Incontinent Urinary Diversion

People with tetraplegia, especially females often have difficulty performing clean intermittent catherization.  In addition, females are more troubled by persistent incontinence.  Surgery as described in this section can result in the ability to self-catheterize, allowing the individual to benefit from intermittent rather than continuous bladder catheterization, the latter being associated with a higher rate of complications. The mitrofanoff channel involves the use of an autologous tubular structure, usually the appendix, as a cutaneous catheterizable stoma.  Implantation in the bladder via a submucosal tunnel provides continence to the conduit (Sylora et al. 1997). The stoma can be hidden in the umbilicus. While performed often in children, the procedure has less commonly been performed in adults. Long term followup is unknown, particularly malignant potential. Karsenty et al. (2008) describes a similar procedure, performed in 13 patients with incontinence and inability to self-catheterize.

Ileal conduit diversion, another surgical approach more commonly performed in females, is often considered for these same reasons of lack of manual dexterity or ease of care and convenience (Pazooki et al. 2006; Chartier-Kastler et al. 2002). This technique aims to establish low-pressure urinary drainage by diverting urine prior to entering the bladder and connecting the ureters to an external urinary collection system via a catheter passed through the ileal lumen. This procedure is sometimes conducted along with removal of the bladder as well (Chartier-Kastler et al. 2002; Kato et al. 2002).

Table 13 Continent Catheterizable Stoma and Incontinent Urinary Diversion

Discussion

Continent Catheterizable Stoma

Although the above studies comprised small sample sizes, the results are very promising.  High levels of continence and independence, and the ability to manage the bladder with intermittent catheterization are reported in all three studies. Upper tract function was implied to be stable by Karsenty et al. (2008), as serum creatinine remained stable.  Patients involved in the procedures reported by Hakenberg et al. (2001) underwent urodynamic testing, which showed safe bladder pressures during storage (20 – 44 mm H20). Participants in this study and the study by Sylora et al. (1997) were kept on anticholinergic medication, a consideration that ensures low pressure storage in those with persistent hyperreflexia and dyssynergia, and contributes to the maintenance of continence. Complications occur, most concerning of which are those requiring surgical procedures (pelvic abscess, bowel occlusion, stomal revision for stenosis).  Larger sample sizes would be necessary to determine true incidence. Length of follow-up ranged from 20 – 44 months, which does not provide sufficiently long term safety and effectiveness data.  However, given the importance of the clinical achievements (i.e., independent use of intermittent catheterization; continence) further study with larger sample sizes is warranted.

Incontinent Urinary Diversion

Ileal conduit diversion is another surgical procedure noted with some frequency in the literature. Chartier-Kastler et al. (2002) and Kato et al. (2002) have reported separate case series (N=33 and N=16 respectively) examining this approach. Chartier-Kastler et al. (2002) reported all patients became continent after initially being incontinent prior to surgery and Kato et al. (2002) reported that most patients were more satisfied with the procedure than their previous management method upon survey a few months after the operation. Both authors also reported several long-term complications. However, it is uncertain if these high complication rates would be comparable in the event individuals had continued with their previous form of bladder management, as often surgical procedures are performed only if other more conservative methods are unsuccessful. Controlled trials (e.g., case control study design) would be beneficial to address this issue.

Conclusion

  • There is level 4 evidence that most individuals who receive catheterizable stomas become newly continent and can self-catheterize. It appears possible that this surgical intervention could protect upper tract function. Larger studies are needed to better evaluate true incidence of complications, and long-term bladder and renal outcome.
  • There is level 4 evidence that most individuals undergoing cutaneous ileal conduit (ileo-ureterostomy) diversion became newly continent and were more satisfied than with their previous bladder management method. Long-term follow-up demonstrated the presence of a high incidence of urological or renal complications.
  • Catheterizable abdominal stomas may increase the likelihood of achieving continence and independence in self-catherization, and may result in a bladder management program that offers more optimal upper tract protection.
  • Cutaneous ileal conduit diversion may increase the likelihood of achieving continence but may also be associated with a high incidence of various long-term complications.

Electrical Stimulation for Bladder Emptying (and Enhancing Volumes)

Although electrostimulation to enhance bladder volume and induce voiding has been studied since the 1950’s it was not until the development of the Brindley anterior sacral nerve root stimulator, and subsequent implantation of the first device in a human in 1978 that widespread clinical applications have been available (Egon et al. 1998; Brindley et al. 1982). Others have noted the important role of Tanagho and Schmidt (1982) in developing this approach – also termed sacral neuromodulation – by conducting a series of experiments to elucidate the neuroanatomical basis of electrical stimulation in enhancing bladder function (Hassouna et al. 2003). Although there are several configurations, Creasey et al. (2001) described the system employed in most investigations (i.e., the Finetech-Brindley system), as consisting of an implanted internal stimulator-receiver which is controlled and powered via telemetered radio transmission by an external controller-transmitter. Cables and electrodes are also implanted which are held in contact with sacral nerves (i.e., often S2-S4). This system allows programmable stimulation patterns and permits control of both bowel and bladder function. Often dorsal sacral rhizotomy is performed at the same time as stimulator implantation (Vastenholt et al. 2003; Creasey et al. 2001; Egon et al. 1998).

Various investigators have examined other forms of stimulation including direct bladder stimulation (Madersbacher et al. 1982; Radziszweski et al. 2009) or employing stimulators intended for other purposes such as enhancing muscle functions for improving movement, spasticity or muscle strength (Katz et al. 1991; Wheeler et al. 1986). In addition, multi-functional stimulators may be configured to provide similar stimulation patterns to similar targets as the bladder-specific stimulators. As noted previously (Section 13.3.2.1 Electrical Stimulation to Enhance Bladder Volumes), the present section describes studies that assess outcomes associated with both bladder emptying and bladder storage as appropriately configured stimulation may result in improvements in both of these functions.

Table 14 Electrical Stimulation to Trigger Bladder Emptying and Enhance Bladder Volume

Discussion

Sacral neuromodulation or sacral anterior root stimulation combined with sacral deafferentation is the most well studied method of triggering bladder emptying via electrical stimulation techniques with many investigators incorporating retrospective case series or prospective pre-post study designs comprising level 4 evidence (Robinson et al. 1988; Van Kerrebroeck et al. 1996; Van Kerrebroeck et al. 1997; Egon et al. 1998; Creasey et al. 2001; Vastenholt et al. 2003; Kutzenberger et al. 2005; Kutzenberger 2007; Lombardi and Del Popolo 2009; Possover 2009). Typical participant characteristics for these studies include: detrusor overactivity; incomplete bladder emptying and frequently recurrent UTI; incontinence; and vesicoureteric reflux, refractory to conservative treatment. In each of these studies, a large percentage of subjects did become continent and were able to successfully void with these devices, whereas this was typically not the case for most participants with whatever bladder management method was used prior to implantation. These findings appear to persist in that several reports have noted continued improvement with successful continence rates of 73-88% over an average follow-up period up to 8.6 years (Egon et al. 1998; Vastenholt et al. 2003; Kutzenbergen et al. 2005; Kutzenberger 2007; Lombardi and Del Popolo 2009). Of note, Lombardi & Del Popolo (2009) conducted a study that included patients with underactive bladder (n=13) in addition to those with overactive bladder (n=11) and reported similar results for both groups (i.e., reduction in incontinence and increased voiding volume). However, 30.8% of persons in the underactive bladder group had a loss of efficacy over the follow-up period (mean of 60.7 months) as compared to none in the overactive bladder group.

Several of these investigators reported a significant decrease in UTIs (Van Kerrebroeck et al. 1996; Egon et al. 1998; Vastenholt et al., 2003; Creasey et al. 2001; Kutzenberger et al. 2005; Kutzenberger 2007) and autonomic dysreflexia (Van Kerrebroeck et al. 1996; Egon et al. 1998; Creasey et al. 2001; Kutzenberger et al. 2005; Kutzenberger 2007; Possover 2009) among participants, even after long-term use. Some investigators performed satisfaction surveys and reported that most participants remained satisfied with the device, even after many years. In particular, Vastenholt et al. (2003) conducted a Qualiveen questionnaire for assessing the bladder health-related quality of life and impact of urinary problems. Overall, the top 3 advantages noted by stimulator users was a reduction in UTIs (68% reporting), improved social life (54%) and improved continence (54%).

Posterior rhizotomy was performed in addition to implantation of a sacral root stimulator in most reports (Creasey et al. 2001; Van Kerrebroeck et al. 1996; Egon et al. 1998; Kutzenberger et al. 2005; Kutzenberger 2007). The stated benefit of this deafferentation is the abolition of dyssynergia and high intravesical pressures, reduced risk of hydronephrosis and reflex incontinence. The cost is the loss of bowel reflexes and reflex erections. Nonetheless, most authors report improved bowel management in many of their patients (since the stimulator is activated during the bowel routine), and a great improvement in autonomic dysreflexia (Van Kerrebroeck et al. 1996; Egon et al. 1998; Creasey et al. 2001; Kutzenberger 2007). In Robinson et al. (1988) sphincterotomies were performed on 3 patients with persistent reflex incontinence, and/or upper tract deterioration, while 3 patients were given sphincterotomies pre-implantation to prevent anticipated autonomic dysreflexia. Thus, sphincterotomy has shown some success as an option for producing some of the benefits attributed to posterior rhizotomy.

A primary purpose of posterior rhizotomy is the attainment of an areflexic bladder, thus allowing a more compliant reservoir with the potential for greater bladder capacity under lower pressure. Results from all investigations measuring capacity have shown this to be true with significant increases in bladder capacity at lower pressures associated with combined sacral anterior root stimulation and sacral deafferentation (Creasey et al. 2001; Van Kerrebroeck et al. 1996; Egon et al. 1998; Kutzenberger et al. 2005, 2007). Several investigations have been conducted using different approaches aimed at conditioning the bladder with different forms of stimulation so as to achieve the same effect of increasing bladder capacity under low-pressure conditions in persons with SCI with overactive bladder and intact dorsal sacral nerves (Madersbacher et al. 1982; Kirkham et al. 2002; Kirkham et al. 2002; Bycroft et al. 2004; Hansen et al. 2005).

Of note, Kirkham et al. (2002) implanted the same sacral anterior root stimulator used in the majority of investigations (i.e., Finetech-Brindley stimulator) in a small group of patients (n=5) without posterior rhizotomies and therefore configured the stimulator to deliver both anterior and posterior sacral root stimulation. The conditioning posterior root stimulation was effective in producing increased bladder capacity in 3 of 5 subjects and the anterior root stimulation was able to elicit bladder emptying, but with significant residual volumes. (Note: the 2 remaining subjects sustained posterior root damage and were not included in post-operative testing.) This preliminary trial suggests there is a possibility of achieving success with sacral anterior root stimulation without necessitating the destructive posterior root ablation.

Others have conducted more mechanistic investigations of conditioning stimuli delivered to the pudenal, dorsal penile or clitoral nerve (Spinelli et al 2005; Kirkham et al. 2001) or magnetic stimulation applied over the sacral nerves (Bycroft et al. 2004) and achieved demonstrations of detrusor inhibition or increased bladder capacity under lower pressure. Further developmental work would be required before these or modified approaches could be incorporated clinically as an approach that permits bladder stimulation in the absence of deafferentation.

Recently, Possover (2009) reported a new surgical technique applied to persons with SCI involving laparoscopic transperitoneal implantation of neural electrodes to pelveoabdominal nerves, which they have termed the “LION procedure” (i.e., laparoscopic implantation of neuroprosthesis). With this method, which is far less invasive than the traditional dorsal approach for stimulator implantation, the risk associated with immediate or long-term complications (e.g., meningitis, encephalitis, infections) is significantly reduced. In addition, the destructive procedures of rhizotomy and laminectomy are not necessary. Possover (2009) conducted this procedure on a series of 8 persons previously having an explanted Brindley-Finetech stimulator, 6 of whom had viable sacral nerves. This resulted in adequate detrusor contractions enabling complete bladder emptying still present at follow-up (3-27 months). Patients undergoing this procedure returned home after only a 3-5 day hospital stay and there were no reported complications.

Another approach has been to apply stimulation to the bladder itself, most appropriately done during initial rehabilitation (Madersbacher et al. 1982; Radziszweski et al. 2009). Radziszweski et al. (2009) applied daily 15 minute bouts of transcutaneous electrical stimulation directly to the bladder for 30 days in patients seen by the Rehabilitation Department of a Military Hospital (time since injury not reported). These authors demonstrated significant increases in bladder capacity and peak flow velocity and a significant decrease in residual urine volume immediately following stimulation and persisting at 2 months follow-up compared to baseline. A similar approach was reported by Madersbacher et al. (1982) in which stimulation, in the form of impulse packages applied to a saline filled bladder, was administered over a variable treatment period after which the treatment effect persisted up to one year when most subjects reported a definite waning of the benefits. Unlike other studies involving sacral neuromodulation, this was conducted on those more recently injured with 17 of 29 becoming continent and 10 others becoming socially dry without need for pads and urinals. This study involved a case series design but would have been much more powerful with the inclusion of a control group, given the potential for natural bladder recovery in individuals with more recent injuries. Further research would also be needed to examine safety information related to bladder pressure during voiding, and follow-up of any potential renal changes before considering this intervention.

Sievert et al (2010) also capitalized on the concept of neural plasticity through early (upon confirmation of bladder acontractility) sacral neromodulation (SNM) and reported no instances of detrusor overactivity and urinary incontinence with normal bladder capacity, reduced UTI rates and improved bowel and erectile functionality without nerve damage. Although follow-up was reported for greater than 2 years, further investigations are needed to augment the small sample size (nSNM=10) and involve fMRI to confirm plastic changes within the brain of those patients undergoing SNM vs those pharmacologically treated.

Other investigators have examined the effects on the urinary system associated with stimulation directed towards other targets For example, Katz et al. (1991) tested the effect of epidural dorsal spinal cord stimulation, intended primarily for spasticity relief, at T1 (for those with tetraplegia) or T11-T12 (for those with paraplegia). Wheeler et al. (1986) investigated the effect of 4 to 8 weeks of quadriceps muscle reconditioning by surface electrical stimulation (FES) bilaterally, intended primarily for strength and spasticity. In each case, these techniques had marginal effects on bladder function. However, in the latter experiment it was noted that some subjects did achieve beneficial changes in bladder function and that these tended to be most noticeable in the same subjects that showed positive improvements in strength and spasticity.

Conclusion

  • There is level 4 evidence from eight studies that ongoing use of sacral anterior root stimulation (accompanied in most cases by posterior sacral rhizotomy) is an effective method of bladder emptying resulting in reduced incontinence for the majority of those implanted. This is associated with increased bladder capacity and reduced post-void residual volume.
  • There is level 4 evidence from five studies that sacral anterior root stimulation (accompanied in most cases by posterior sacral rhizotomy) may be associated with reducing UTIs and autonomic dysreflexia.
  • There is level 4 evidence from two studies that direct bladder stimulation may result in reduced incontinence, increased bladder capacity and reduced residual volumes but requires further study as to its potential clinical use.
  • There is level 4 evidence from various single studies that other forms of neuroanatomically-related stimulation (e.g., electrical conditioning stimulation to posterior sacral, pudenal, dorsal penile or clitoral nerve or surface magnetic sacral stimulation) may result in increased bladder capacity but require further study as to their potential clinical use. Further development involving some of these approaches may permit sacral anterior root stimulation without the need for posterior root ablation.
  • There is limited level 2 evidence from a single small study that reports early sacral neuromodulation may improve management of lower urinary tract dysfunction.  Further investigation is required to confirm the results and substantiate the hypothesis of resultant plastic changes of the brain.
  • There is level 4 evidence from a single study that epidural dorsal spinal cord stimulation at T1 or T11 originally intended for reducing muscle spasticity may have little effect on bladder function.
  • There is level 4 evidence from a single study that a program of functional electrical stimulation exercise involving the quadriceps muscle originally intended for enhancing muscle function and reducing muscle spasticity has only marginal (if any) effects on bladder function.
  • Sacral anterior root stimulation (accompanied in most cases by posterior sacral rhizotomy) enhances bladder function and is an effective bladder management technique though the program (surgery and followup) requires significant expertise.
  • Direct bladder stimulation may be effective in reducing incontinence and increasing bladder capacity but requires further study.
  • Posterior sacral, pudenal,dorsal penile or clitoral nerve stimulation may be effective to increase bladder capacity but requires further study.
  • Early sacral neural modulation may improve management of lower urinary tract dysfunction but requires further study.

Sphincterotomy, Artificial Sphincters, Stents and Related Approaches for Bladder Emptying

Transtherurethral sphincterotomy and related procedures such as insertion of artificial sphincters, sphincteric stents or balloon dilation of the external urinary sphincter provide a means to overcome persistent dysynergia (Chancellor et al. 1999; Juma et al. 1995; Chancellor et al. 1993a; Chancellor et al. 1993b; Patki et al. 2006; Seoane-Rodriguez et al. 2007). Often these are performed when intermittent catheterization is not an option because of lack of manual dexterity and when more conservative options have proven unsuccessful (Chancellor et al. 1999; Juma et al. 1995).

Table 15 Sphincterotomy, Intraurethral Stent Insertion and Related Approaches for Bladder Emptying

Discussion

A common surgical method of treating bladder outlet obstruction or detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia has been transurethral sphincterotomy usually done in anticipation of emptying the bladder with condom drainage with reflex “voiding”.  Autonomic dysreflexia (AD), a common complication of high volume storage and/or high pressure “voiding” or leaking in SCI patients with spinal lesions typically above T12, can be diagnosed with blood pressure (BP) monitoring during cystometrogram and urodynamic studies and subsequently better managed after successful transurethral sphincterotomy (Perkash 2007). Perkash (2007) noted a highly significant (p<0.0001) decrease in systolic and diastolic BP after transurethral sphincterotomy as well as improved voiding and post-void residuals.  However, although diminished symptoms of AD were reported, mean maximum voiding pressures changes were not significant.

Juma et al. (1995) reported a case series of 63 individuals who had received 1 or more sphincterotomies with a mean follow-up time of 11 (range 2-30) years. This study was directed at describing the risk for long-term complications following this procedure. Although more than half of these individuals had normal upper tract imaging studies a significant proportion had complications - with 25/63 having some upper tract pathology (i.e., 12 renal calculi, 11 renal scarring, 1 atrophic kidney, 1 renal cyst). Nineteen of these were deemed significant. Risk of significant upper tract complications in presence or absence of bacteria was 38% and 13% respectively. Thirty out of 63 had lower tract complications (5 bladder calculi, 10 recurrent UTI, 3 urethral diverticula, 6 urethral stricture or bladder neck stenosis and 6 recurrent epididymitis). These authors noted that the most reliable urodynamic measure for predicting potential complications following sphincterotomy appeared to be an increase in leak point pressure. Complication rates of 50% were noted for those with leak point pressure of > 70 cm H2O, whereas rates were reduced to 25% when leak point pressure was < 30 cm H2O.

Despite possible upper renal tract protection and extended periods of satisfactory bladder function (i.e., 81 months), long-term outcome data (Pan et al 2009) caution that high rates of recurring bladder dysfunction symptoms (68%) require approaching sphincterotomy as a staged intervention given that 36% (30/84) of patients required a second procedure to achieve the mean extended period of satisfactory bladder function. When considering these studies, it is uncertain if these high complication rates would be comparable in the event individuals had continued with their previous form of bladder management as often surgical procedures are performed only if other more conservative methods are unsuccessful. A controlled trial is required to address this issue.

One alternative to sphinterotomy is placement of a stent passing through the external sphincter thereby ensuring an open passage. Several studies have been conducted examining the long-term outcomes associated with different types of stents including a wire mesh stent (UroLume) (Chancellor et al.1993a, Abdill et al. 1994, Chancellor et al. 1995) and a nickel-titanium alloy tightly coiled stent (Memokath) (Mehta & Tophill 2006). Long-term outcomes of each of these stents were also investigated in a retrospective case series study of 47 consecutive male patients (Seoane-Rodriguez et al. 2007). All of these studies involved either retrospective case series reviews or prospective pre-post study designs and demonstrated effective treatment of incontinence initially while the stent was in place although some studies also showed the necessity for stent removal due to migration or other complications. In particular, Mehta and Tophill (2006), in a case series of 29 persons with SCI with a follow-up of up to 47 months suggested that the “working life” of the Memokath stent was 21 months. They noted that complications most commonly leading to removal included stent blockage by encrustation, migration (especially in single-ended models), UTIs and persistent haematuria. Others have noted similar issues but typically have reported lower rates of complications leading to stent removal (Abdill et al. 1994, Chancellor et al. 1995, Seoane-Rodriguez et al. 2007). Despite these issues, when the stents are in place they appear to be effective, resulting in significant reductions in voiding pressure and post-void residual urine volumes although no significant changes have been noted in bladder capacity (Chancellor et al.1993a; Abdill et al. 1994; Chancellor et al. 1995; Seoane-Rodriguez et al. 2007). In addition, reduced incidence of UTIs and autonomic dysreflexia has typically been reported (Chancellor et al.1993a; Seoane-Rodriguez et al. 2007). Game et al (2008) advocate for a trial period with a temporary stent early post-injury based on the percentage of patients (~30%) not choosing placement of a permanent stent or in whom the stent did not provide the expected results.  This reversible management option is however, limited by the available materials for temporary stenting.

Chancellor and colleagues (1999) also conducted a RCT (n=57) comparing the outcomes associated with sphincterotomy as compared to placement of the stent (UroLome) prosthesis (Chancellor et al. 1999). This study was deemed a low quality RCT, largely because blinding and concealed allocation was not possible given the nature of the intervention. Similar measurement procedures and overall findings were noted as reported for the studies above (i.e., Chancellor et al. 1993c) with significant decreases in voiding detrusor pressure and post-void residual urine volumes and no significant changes reported for bladder capacity and no differences noted between sphincterotomy and stent for any measure at any time point (i.e., 3, 6, 12 and 24 months). The need for catheterization, initially required in 50% of the sphincterotomy group (n=26) and 71% of the stent group (n=31), was reduced to just 3, 4, 1, & 1 and 1, 0, 1 & 2 individuals respectively at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months respectively. There was little difference in subjective assessment of impact of bladder function on quality of life or in the incidence of complications between the treatment groups although those in the stent group spent less time in the hospital for the procedure.

Chancellor et al. (1993b) also have examined another procedure with similar rationale as that associated with sphincterotomy. This investigation involved a pre-post trial design (n=17) of transurethral balloon dilation of the external urinary sphincter. Again, similar methods were employed as the studies noted above and findings were also similar. Of all 17 patients previously managed by indwelling Foley catheter, 15 used condom catheters post-procedure and 2 voided on their own. Significant decreases were noted in voiding pressure (p=0.008) at all follow-up times (i.e., 3, 6 and 12 months). No changes were seen in bladder capacity (p=0.30) and significant reductions in post-void residual urine volumes (p<0.05) were seen at all follow-up times. Positive urine cultures (i.e., UTI) were noted in 15/17 prior to surgery but only in 5, 8 and 4 of the patients at 3, 6 and 12 months respectively. Subjective autonomic dysreflexia improved in all 9 individuals who had previously complained of this.

More recently, Patki et al. (2006) reported a small retrospective case series investigation (n=9) of implantation of an artificial urinary sphincter (American Medical System 800). This device has evolved over the years to where it is now easier to implant surgically, has a longer life and a higher success rate in achieving incontinence (~80% with more recent models). In this trial, all patients achieved successful incontinence with no self-reported leakage upon activation of the system. However, by 3 month follow-up, 2 patients reported significant recurrrent incontinence, with one implant being removed and the other being revised and by a mean follow-up of 105.2 months 5 of 9 implants have been successful with no revisions. Overall, more than half of the patients with working implants recorded higher maximum detrusor pressures although no upper tract change or deterioration in renal function was noted in any patient.

Conclusion

  • There is level 4 evidence from a single case-series study that sphincterotomy is effective in reducing episodes of autonomic dysreflexia associated with inadequate voiding.
  • There is level 4 evidence from a single case-series study that sphincterotomy, as a staged intervention, can provide long-term satisfactory bladder function.
  • There is level 2 evidence from a single low-quality RCT but supported by level 4 studies that both sphincterotomy and implantation of a sphincteric stent are effective in reducing incontinence, with little need for subsequent catheterization, and both treatments are associated with reduced detrusor pressure and reduced post-void residual volume but not with changes in bladder capacity. The only significant difference in these 2 treatments was the reduced initial hospitalization associated with the stent, given the lesser degree of invasiveness.
  • There is level 4 evidence that implantation of a sphincteric stent may result in reduced incidence of UTIs and bladder-related autonomic dysreflexia over the short-term although several studies have demonstrated the potential for various complications and subsequent need for re-insertion or another approach over the long-term.
  • There is level 4 evidence from a single long-term follow-up study of those having a previous sphincterotomy that the incidence of various upper and lower tract urological complications may be quite high.
  • There is level 4 evidence from a single case-series study that advocates for placement of a temporary stent early after injury as a reversible option that allows patients to choose from the range of permanent stent placement to less invasive bladder management methods such as intermittent catheterization.
  • There is level 4 evidence based on a single study that transurethral balloon dilation of the external sphincter may permit removal of indwelling catheters in place of condom drainage, and also may result in reduced detrusor pressure and post-void residual volume but not with changes in bladder capacity.
  • There is level 4 evidence based on a single study that implantation of an artificial urinary sphincter may be useful in the treatment of incontinence in SCI but further study is required.
  • Surgical and prosthetic approaches (with a sphincterotomy and stent respectively) to allow bladder emptying through a previously dysfunctional external sphincter both seem equally effective resulting in enhanced drainage although both may result in long-term upper and lower urinary tract complications.
  • Artificial urinary sphincter implantation and transurethral balloon dilation of the external sphincter may be associated with improved bladder outcomes but require further study.

Other Miscellaneous Treatments

In addition to those noted in the previous sections, there are a variety of other approaches that have been investigated to address the consequences of neurogenic bladder associated with SCI. These include the use of desmopressin acetate (DDAVP) as an adjuvant therapy to manage the effects of an overactive bladder otherwise refractory to conventional treatment such as nocturnal enuresis (i.e., night-time emission of urine) or the requirement for too frequent catheterizations. DDAVP is a synthetic analogue of antidiuretic hormone (ADH) most commonly administered by intravenous infusion for treatment of bleeding disorders.  It can also be taken in the form of a pill or intranasal spray for reducing urine production as in the present application (Chancellor et al. 1994; Zahariou et al. 2007).  DDAVP is thought to bind to V2 receptors in renal collecting ducts to increase water reabsorption.

Others have employed alternative approaches such as electroacupuncture (Cheng et al. 1998) or nerve crossover surgery / spinal root anastomoses (Livshits et al. 2004; Lin et al. 2008; Lin et al. 2009) to enhance recovery of bladder function.

Table 16 Other Miscellaneous Treatments

Discussion

Zahariou et al. (2007) and Chancellor et al. (1994) conducted a pre-post (n=11) and a case series (n=7) investigation retrospectively to investigate the use of intranasal DDAVP as an alternative therapy to reduce urine production in the hopes of reducing nocturnal emissions or reducing the need for overly frequent catheterization during the day. In each case, DDAVP was employed as an adjuvant therapy in addition to standard therapies of anticholinergics and intermittent catheterization which had resulted in less than satisfactory results. With use of DDAVP just before bedtime, Zahariou et al. (2007) reported a statistically significant increase in urine production rate during the day (p<0.001) and a decrease in nocturnal urine production (p<0.001). After DDAVP treatment, participants had reduced or complete elimination of nocturnal enuresis (Chancellor et al. 1994; Zahariou et al. 2007). In addition, the proportion of persons requiring clean intermittent catheterizations in the night while still maintaining continence was greatly reduced (Zahariou et al. 2007) and 3 individuals used DDAVP during the day at work and were able to achieve an additional 3.5 hours between catheterizations (Chancellor et al. 1994). These improvements persisted for a mean of 12 months.  These small scale studies provides only preliminary evidence and encourages further study, although DDAVP is in fairly widespread use for SCI-related neurogenic bladder. 

Another adjunctive therapy that has been investigated is the use of electroacupuncture. For example, Cheng et al. (1998) conducted a RCT (n=60) investigating the effectiveness of electroacupuncture administered in combination with conventional bladder management method (i.e., intermittent catheterization, tapping and trigger point stimulation) as compared to those not receiving electroacupuncture. Their primary outcome measure was the time to achieve bladder balancing which was defined as the time when 1) the patient could easily pass adequate urine at low pressure, 2) residual urine of approximately 100 ml or less and 3) absent UTIs. Although employing a randomized, controlled design, some limitations (i.e., lack of blinding, concealed allocation or intent to treat) constrained the level of evidence assigned to this trial (i.e., Level 2). Regardless, those receiving electroacupuncture had a reduced time to achieve bladder balancing for both those with upper motor lesions (p<0.005) and lower motor neuron lesions (p<0.01). In addition, if electroacupuncture was started within 3 weeks of SCI, bladder balancing was achieved sooner than those which started after 3 weeks (p<0.005).

Reports regarding microanastamosis to reinnervate the paralyzed bladder reveal recovery of neurogenic bladder dysfunction.  These include surgical anastomosis of the intercostal nerve (Livshits et al 2004; n=11), T11 nerve root (Lin et al 2008, n=10), L5 nerve root (Xiao et al 2003, n=15) or the S1 nerve root (Lin et al 2009, n=12) to the S2 or S3 spinal nerve roots.  Mean follow-up of patients was between 2 to 3 years and restitution of bladder function was observed in the majority of patients. Significant results were reported for pre and post-surgical findings including reduced bladder capacity with increased urine volume under increased force of detrusor contractions and increased voiding pressure. There was also reduced residual urine volume and both detrusor tone and sphincter resistance were increased. Results from individual subjects in Livshits et al (2004) were presented for each of these showing consistency across these measures although statistical analysis techniques were inappropriate consisting of individual Wilcoxon signed rank tests for each variable. Patient self-report measures showed increases within a few months following surgery. Similar findings were evident in 100/67/75% of patients undergoing T11/L5/S1 microanastamosis respectively (Lin et al 2009, Xiao et al 2003, Lin et al 2008). Full recovery of renal function and an absence of urinary tract infections was observed at follow-up (i.e., 6-18 months). Important considerations of this surgical approach are that it is far more invasive than other approaches (i.e., indwelling catherization); and patients do not regain the bladder sensation that contributes to quality of life (i.e., sensing urgency and timing of micturition).  In particular, accidental voiding may be triggered by unintentional dermatomal stimulation or Achilles tendon stretch.  Furthermore, considering the potential for up to 30% failure rates and serious side effects (i.e. neuromas) this invasive procedure must be weighed cautiously against other approaches to treatment of bladder dysfunction.

Conclusion

  • There is level 2 evidence from a single study that early treatment with electroacupuncture may shorten the time that it takes to develop low pressure voiding /emptying with minimal residual volume, when combined with conventional methods of bladder management. 
  • Level 4 evidence from two studies suggests that intranasal DDVAP may reduce nocturnal urine production with fewer night-time emissions and also may reduce the need for more frequent catheterizations in persons with SCI with neurogenic bladder that is otherwise unresponsive to conventional therapy.
  • There is level 4 evidence from four studies that nerve crossover surgery (anastomosis of more rostral ventral nerve roots to S2-S3 spinal nerve roots) may result in improved bladder function in chronic SCI. 
  • Early electroacupuncture therapy as adjunctive therapy may result in decreased time to achieve desired outcomes.
  • Intranasal DDVAP may reduce nocturnal urine emissions and decrease the frequency of voids (or catheterizations).
  • Anastomosis of the T11, L5 or S1 to the S2-S3 spinal nerve roots may result in improved bladder function in chronic SCI.

Detrusor Areflexia

Detrusor areflexia is seen most commonly in cauda equina lesions where the sacral reflex is disrupted. It can occasionally occur at other levels of spinal lesions. The clinical manifestation of this results in an inability for the bladder to empty completely or at all, leading to overdistension and stasis. Additionally, there is frequently incontinence due to lack of external sphincter tone, most often due to increased abdominal pressure on the bladder (i.e. stress incontinence). This can be especially problematic in persons with paraplegia that may require high valsalva forces for activities such as transferring from wheelchairs.

Unfortunately, there is a great paucity of research examining the impact and treatment of detrusor areflexia. Although the goals remain the same as with overactive bladder in SCI, (i.e., avoiding incontinence, stasis, UTI’s, and upper urinary tract damage, etc.), these goals may be achieved differently. In general, the goal is either: 1) stopping leakage and improving storage with medications and intermittent catheterization, or 2) improving emptying, either voluntarily in the incomplete injury, and/or into condom drainage in the person with more severe neurogenic bladder impairments. However, further discussion on detrusor areflexia will not occur in this chapter given the extremely sparse evidence base. It should be noted that in some studies described in the sections pertaining to DESD therapy there may have been mixed samples in which a few subjects with detrusor areflexia might have participated in addition to those with detrusor overactivity. In one instance, subjects with detrusor areflexia comprised all study participants providing level 4 evidence from a single case series (n=10) for the surgical anastomosis of the T11 ventral nerve root to the S2-S3 ventral nerve roots in improving bladder function (e.g., Lin et al. 2008 in Table 13.16 for Other Miscellaneous Treatments).

Urinary Tract Infections

Defining Urinary Tract Infections

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are a common secondary health condition following SCI and a major cause of morbidity (Charlifue et al. 1999; Vickrey et al. 1999). There are numerous ways that UTIs have been defined within individual studies with respect to either identifying the presence of UTIs and/or establishing treatment success. Although this diversity exists across studies, the criteria identified at the National Institute on Disability Rehabilitation Research (NIDRR) sponsored National Consensus Conference on UTI (1992) have become generally accepted standards for UTI definition. These designate a UTI as indicative of significant bacteriuria with tissue invasion and resultant tissue response with signs and / or symptoms. Signs and symptoms include the following:

  • Leukocytes in the urine generated by the mucosal lining,
  • Discomfort or pain over the kidneys or bladder, or during urination,
  • Onset of urinary incontinence,
  • Fever,
  • Increased spasticity,
  • Autonomic hyperreflexia,
  • Cloudy urine with increased odor,
  • Malaise, lethargy, or sense of unease.

Significant bacteriuria varies according to the method of urinary drainage and is defined by the following criteria: ≥102 colony-forming units of uropathogens per milliliter (cfu/mL) in catheter specimens from persons on intermittent catheterization, (b) ≥104 cfu/mL in clean-voided specimens from catheter-free men using condom catheters, c) any detectable concentration of uropathogens in urine specimens from indwelling or suprapubic catheters, and d) ≥105 cfu/mL for spontaneous management.

Detecting and Investigating UTIs

Detecting a UTI is the first stage towards successful treatment. Identification of symptoms by the patient is a critical first step in this detection; however, in a prospective case review undertaken by Linsenmeyer and Oakley (2003) only 61% (90/147) of patients were able to correctly predict the presence of a UTI based on their symptoms. Other methods of detection include urine chemical dipsticks which provide an indication of the presence of nitrites and leukocytes with the benefit of a providing a quick turnaround (Faarvang et al. 2000; Hoffman et al. 2004). However, the primary approach and gold standard is the microbiological evaluation of urine bacterial culture. As noted above, organizations such as NIDRR have defined UTIs at least in part on the results of laboratory investigations documenting the presence, amount and type of bacterial growth that occurs with an infection. This also results in the identification of the antibiotic(s) for which the bacteria species may be susceptible (i.e., sensitivity). Furthermore, it has been noted that 33% of SCI UTIs are polymicrobial (Dow et al. 2004).  The clinician must then decide between a limited or full microbial investigation in selecting the appropriate treatment.  The obvious benefit of a full microbial investigation (i.e. accuracy) is offset by potentially adverse effects due to the time delay for the bacterial sensitivity results and the cost of a full investigation. The studies reviewed in the present section examine specific issues associated with the laboratory investigation of UTIs and how these might impact treatment.

Table 17 Investigating UTIs

Discussion

As noted above, laboratory investigation of suspected UTI using microbiological analysis of urine cultures is important for diagnosing UTI and also for guiding treatment. For example, Shah et al. (2005), Hoffman et al. (2004) and Tantisiriwat et al. (2007) reporting centre-based results under a variety of study designs, noted Enteroccoccus species, K. pneumonia, E coli, Pseudomonas aerginosa, Staphlococcus aureus and Proteus mirabilis as among the most common species of bacteria present in urine from those suspected of having a UTI. Antibiotic sensitivity tests are then conducted to determine if these bacteria are susceptible to specific antibiotics. For example, Tantisiriwat et al. (2007) noted that of the antibiotics tested, E. coli was most susceptible to amikacin (96.1%), ceftazidime (88.9%), and cetriaxone (75%). The efficacy of specific antibiotics investigated in the SCI literature will be summarized in subsequent sections.

However, given the cost and the time spent before results can be obtained with bacterial culture (e.g., from 18-48 hours), simpler screening methods have been developed for assessing the presence of a UTI. One of these methods involves using a urine “dipstick” which signifies the presence of nitrates or the presence of leukocyte esterase (LE) respectively as a potential indicator of UTI. The results of investigations into the sensitivity and specificity of these dipstick tests in predicting UTI in patient populations other than SCI have been mixed so Hoffman et al. (2004) conducted an investigation to compare dipstick results for Nitrites and LE to urine culture results where each test was conducted monthly over a 5 year period in a community-based SCI sample (n=56). Using NIDRR criteria for significant bacteriuria and UTI, 81% of the total 695 samples collected over the study period met criteria for bacteriuria, and of these, 36% met criteria for a positive UTI. In general, sensitivity (i.e., the ability to correctly identify significant results) was relatively low at 63% even when either the LE or nitrate dipstick was positive and specificity (i.e., the ability to correctly identify samples without significant bacteria) was 89% or higher for any combination of test.  When compared to the ability to predict UTIs, the dipstick sensitivity remained relatively low at 63% and specificity was also low at 52% for any combination of dipstick test. Overall results suggest using dipstick testing as a treatment guide could result in inappropriate or delayed treatment and the study authors suggested that individuals with SCI with suspected UTI should be evaluated with urine culture and not dipstick testing (Hoffman et al. 2004). However, a separate investigation comparing positive and negative predictive values for dipstick testing as compared to leukocyte microscopy relative to culture-derived bacteriuria determined that either method was equally effective with reasonable prediction rates of approximately 80% for each alone or in combination (Faarvang et al. 2000).

Practicality and cost savings in UTI prevention and treatment may not have been the prime motive in an investigation by Darouiche et al. (1997), but they did find that an adequate clinical response to treatment was not significantly different as a result of limited vs full microbial investigation.  Limited investigations were conducted by examining colony morphology, appearance on Gram-stain, catalase test and oxidase test without organism identification and antibiotic susceptibilities. Rather, antibiotic selection was based on recognized hospital-based patterns of antibiotic susceptibilities. As well, the cost savings, at an average of $183 US per patient, was not significantly less but indicated a trend (p=0.18) associated with limited vs full investigation.  Although this provides level 1 evidence in favour of deferring to a limited microbial investigation for SCI UTI treatment selection, the sample size was small (N=15) and warrants further study. It is also unclear from this study if the results are transferable to anything but an inpatient hospital unit (i.e., not community-based patients) and if treatment is determined in part by relying on the experience of the clinical team in determining treatment.

The results of clinical laboratory analysis are also prone to contamination from a variety of practical issues. For example, sample deterioration between the time of sampling and processing is controversial.  Horton et al. (1998) conducted a blinded RCT to investigate the effects of refrigeration on urinalysis and culture results.  Samples were split and analyzed at 4 (“fresh”) and 24 (“refrigerated”) hours post-refrigeration.  The bacterial counts of “mixed” organisms (p=0.10) and Staph aureus (p=0.66) were altered with refrigeration but no changes in colony counts would have altered the treatment regimen chosen based on urinalysis or culture results.  This level 1 evidence provides a level of confidence for urine samples refrigerated (up to 24 hours) prior to analysis.

In another investigation of a narrower issue involving potential contamination, Shah et al. (2005) demonstrated that the number of clinically significant organisms (≥105 cfu/mL) detected by urine culture were reduced in SCI inpatients with indwelling or suprapubic catheters suspected of having a UTI when the catheter was changed just prior to urine collection as compared to those where it was left unchanged (p=0.01). This practice also resulted in a savings of $15.64 per patient.

Conclusion

  • Level 1 evidence based on a single RCTon SCI inpatients suggests that both limited and full microbial investigation result in adequate clinical response to UTI treatment with antibiotics.  Therefore the cost savings attributed to a limited microbial investigation favours this practice in the investigation of UTI although more rigorous investigation of the patient outcomes and attributed costs is needed.
  • There is limited level 1 evidence from a single investigation that refrigeration (up to 24 hours) of urine samples prior to sample processing does not significantly alter urinalysis or urine culture results in SCI patients.
  • There is limited level 2 evidence from a single investigation that fewer false positive tests showing bacteriuria occur if indwelling or suprapubic catheters are changed prior to collection for urine culture analysis.
  • There is conflicting level 4 evidence from two investigations concerning whether dipstick testing for nitrates or leukocyte esterase is recommended to guide treatment decision-making.
  • Both limited and full microbial investigation may result in adequate clinical response to UTI treatment with antibiotics.
  • Indwelling or suprapubic catheters should be changed just prior to urine collection so as to limit the amount of false positive urine tests.
  • Urinalysis and urine culture results of SCI patients are not likely to be affected by sample refrigeration (up to 24 hours).
  • It is uncertain if dipstick testing for nitrates or leukocyte esterase is useful in screening for bacteriuria to assist treatment decision-making.

Non-Pharmacological Methods of Preventing UTIs

The method of bladder management one selects is a primary factor in reducing the risk of UTI in persons with SCI (Trautner & Darouiche 2002). The method chosen should minimize access to the urinary system by foreign bodies and reduce their potential for continued residence by draining the bladder effectively. Most SCI-related research for UTI prevention by these means has been conducted on various techniques for intermittent catheterization and these types of studies are summarized in Table 13.18. Different coatings have been applied to catheters to minimize various complications associated with catheterization and neurogenic bladder and Table 13.19 outlines studies investigating the effect of hydrophilic catheters on UTI prevention. Finally, Table 13.20 summarizes studies that compare intermittent catheterization to other bladder management methods or use aids to augment the use of a particular bladder management method with a goal of preventing UTIs.

Table 18 Intermittent Catheterization and Prevention of UTIs

Discussion

During inpatient rehabilitation, intermittent catheterization is the preferred method of bladder management for most cases and several prospective studies have compared sterile techniques with traditional or clean techniques of intermittent catheterization (Charbonneau-Smith 1993; Prieto-Fingerhut et al.1997; Moore et al. 2006). Notably, Moore et al. (2006) and Prieto-Fingerhut et al. (1997) employed RCT designs and showed no statistically significant differences in the number of UTIs occurring in patients using the sterile technique vs the clean technique. Conversely, Charbonneau-Smith (1993) conducted a prospective trial and did find significantly reduced UTI rates for a sterile “no-touch” method as compared to historical controls undergoing a traditional sterile method, although the nature of the historical comparison provides the possibility of confounding variables also affecting this result. Each author noted the greater expense associated with the sterile approach, making it the less attractive option in the absence of evidence for improved positive outcomes.

As with all aspects of rehabilitation, a primary goal of bladder training within an inpatient stay is the goal of patient independence and self-care. Wyndaele and De Taeye (1990) conducted a case control study (n= 73) in which the incidence of UTIs was examined following introduction of an initiative to promote self-catheterization among those with paraplegia on an SCI unit. Prior to this, catheterization was conducted by a specialized catheter health care team using a non-touch technique. There were no significant differences in UTI rates nor with the proportion of people achieving a state of bladder balance or those encountering complications of urethral trauma between these 2 approaches. Interestingly, the introduction of patient self-catheterization also seemed to be a factor in the patients being ready for home visits much sooner in their rehabilitation stay.

Less information exists on the continued use of intermittent catheterization for individuals as they move into the community and live with SCI for a prolonged period of time. A case control investigation was conducted by Yadav et al. (1993) comparing UTI incidence rates between those using a clean intermittent catheterization technique during inpatient rehabilitation with another group of patients continuing to use the same bladder management method and living in the community for 1-12 years. Similar rates of UTI (termed acceptably low by the authors) were found in both samples although there were differences in the types of bacteria causing UTIs between the SCI rehabilitation unit and the community.

Regardless of the approach to bladder management, and even if intermittent catheterization is used, the rate of UTI in the SCI population is still elevated relative to a population with neurologically normal functioning bladders This is thought to be partly due to the residual volume of urine that may persist in the bladder following intermittent catheterization. Jensen et al. (1995) conducted a study in inpatient rehabilitation (n=12) correlating UTI incidence over the rehabilitation period with the average residual urine volume after intermittent catheterization. Correlations between UTIs and residual volumes were low and suggested little relationship or as the authors point out it may have been that residual volumes would have had to be reduced to negligible values before UTI incidence would have been reduced as opposed to the mean values of 40 ± 11 ml (hyperactive bladder) or 19 ± 7 ml (hypoactive bladder) seen in this study.

Conclusion

  • Level 2 evidence based on two RCTs suggests no difference in UTI rates between sterile vs clean approaches to intermittent catheterization during inpatient rehabilitation, however, using a sterile method is significantly more costly.
  • There is limited level 4 evidence from a single study that there is no difference in UTI rates between intermittent catheterization conducted by the patients themselves or by a specialized team during inpatient rehabilitation.
  • There is limited level 4 evidence from a single study that similar rates of UTI may be seen for those using clean intermittent catheterization during inpatient rehabilitation as compared to those using similar technique over a much longer time when living in the community.
  • There is limited level 4 evidence from a single study that differences in residual urine volume ranging from 0-153 ml were not associated with differences in UTI during inpatient rehabilitation.
  • Sterile and clean approaches to intermittent catheterization seem equally effective in minimizing UTIs in inpatient rehabilitation.
  • Similar rates of UTI may be seen with intermittent catheterization as conducted by the patients themselves or by a specialized team during inpatient rehabilitation.
  • Similar rates of UTI may be seen with intermittent catheterization, whether conducted in the short-term during inpatient rehabilitation or in the long-term while living in the community.
  • UTIs were not associated with differences in residual urine volumes after intermittent catheterization.

Table 19 Intermittent Catheterization using Specially Coated Catheters for Preventing UTIs

Discussion

Another approach used to reduce the incidence of UTI associated with catheterization in patients with neurogenic bladder involves the application of coatings to the catheter (Giannantoni et al. 2001; Vapnek et al. 2003; De Ridder et al. 2005; Cardenas & Hoffman 2009). For example, Giannantoni et al. (2001) employed a double-blind, crossover RCT design (n=18) to examine the difference between a pre-lubricated, nonhydrophilic Instantcath catheter as compared to a conventional polyvinyl chloride (PVC) silicon-coated Nelaton catheter with respect to the occurrence of UTIs and urethral trauma. The subjects were randomized to 1 of 2 groups which tried each catheter for a period of 7 weeks in an A-B, B-A design. Both incidence of UTIs (p=0.3) and presence of asymptomatic bacteriuria (p=0.024) were significantly reduced for the pre-lubricated catheter vs the conventional PVC catheter. Perhaps most interesting, 3 subjects requiring assistance with the conventional catheter became independent with the pre-lubricated catheter, although it was not reported if these individuals were in the group using the conventional catheter initially or lastly. The existence of an order effect (or not) for any of the measures was not reported. In terms of general satisfaction with use, subjects rated the pre-lubricated catheter significantly higher than the conventional catheter with respect to comfort, ease of inserting and extracting, and handling.

A similar finding of reduced incidence of UTIs (p=0.02) was reported by De Ridder et al. (2005), but in this case the reduction was associated with a hydrophilic catheter as compared to the conventional PVC catheter. This multi-centre investigation also employed a RCT design (N=123) but had several methodological problems that likely constrained the potential utility of the results. Most significant was a high drop-out rate (54%) with slightly more individuals not completing the study from the hydrophilic catheter group. A probable cause for many of these drop-outs was the lengthy treatment period of 1 year during which many individuals were likely to improve bladder function such that intermittent catheterization was no longer required. There were no other significant differences noted between the two groups including the number of bleeding episodes or occurrence of hematuria, leukocyturia and bacteriuria. More individuals expressed greater satisfaction with various aspects of the hydrophilic catheter, although these differences were also not significant. A reduced incidence of hematuria and a significant decrease in UTI incidence was also reported by Vapnek & Maynard (2003), when hydrophilic vs non-hydrophilic catheter use was compared in a 12 month study of 62 patients (n=49 completed).

Reduced numbers of treated UTIs were reported by Cardenas & Hoffman (2009) with the use of hydrophilic catheters vs standard nohydrophlic catheters even though no difference was reported between the 2 groups of self-IC SCI patients for number of symptomatic UTIs.  Furthermore, lubrication was more beneficial for men since women on self-IC were more likely to develop UTIs regardless of catheter type.  Although this study may have been underpowered, it is important to note that the drop out rate was just under 20% as compared to almost 54% in the DeRidder et al (2005) study with only 57/123 subjects remaining at the end of year 1.  The Cardenas & Hoffman (2009) study also included women which allowed for potential gender differentiation in the effect of hydrophilic catheter use.  Although females accounted for 29% of the participants, an n=16 should invoke caution when interpreting the data.

Conclusion

  • There is level 1 evidence based on 1 RCT that pre-lubricated nonhydrophilic catheters are associated with fewer UTIs as compared to conventional Poly Vinyl Chloride catheters.
  • There is conflicting level 2 evidence based on 1 RCT that fewer UTIsmay result with the use of hydrophilic catheters as compared to conventional PVC catheters.
  • There is level 2 evidence based on 1 RCT that use of hydrophilic vs non-hydrophilic catheters are associated with fewer symptomatic UTIs treated with antibiotics even though the number of symptomatic UTIs are similar between groups.
  • A reduced incidence of UTIs or reduced antibiotic treatment of symptomatic UTIs have been associated with pre-lubricated or hydrophilic catheters as compared to standard non-hydrophilic catheters.

Table 20 Other Issues Associated with Bladder Management and UTI Prevention

Discussion

In addition to intermittent catheterization, the effects of other bladder management methods have been investigated with respect to their impact in preventing UTIs. In particular, intermittent catheterization has been compared to indwelling catheterization. Joshi and Darouiche (1996) report following a prospective controlled trial that the response to antibiotic, as indicated by reduced pyuria, is improved and can be assessed earlier in patients who utilize intermittent catheterization over those whose bladder drainage is reliant on suprapubic or indwelling foley catheters. All patients (n=29) experienced relief from appropriate antibiotic therapy after 3-4 days, but the level of residual pyuria was lowest at mid-therapy and after therapy completion in those patients using intermittent catheterization. 

In another comparison study, Nwadiaro et al. (2007) conducted a retrospective comparison of indwelling urethral catheterization and suprapubic cystostomy on UTI prevalence in a predominately illiterate and impoverished population where intermittent catheterization is a less preferred option. Prevalence of UTI was significantly less in the group having a suprapubic versus indwelling urethral catheter (p<0.05). In addition, there was significantly less mortality with the suprapubic catheter (p<0.05) at 1 year post admission with UTI-related septicaemia the number one cause of death in these patients. Sugimura also looked at the incidence of complications in patients using suprapubic catheterization, and reported a 29% incidence of UTI’s, though there was no comparison group in this study. However, in Ku et al. (2005) no bladder management technique was found to be superior in protecting against pyelonephritis (simple UTI was not tracked as an outcome); instead, the presence of vesicoureteral reflux led to a 2.8 fold higher risk of pylonephritis than those without reflux. Reflux is most often associatiated with high pressure urine storage due to low compliance or high pressure voiding due to sphincter spasticity and obstruction. Thus actual bladder pathophysiology may have the largest affect on clinically significant infections with the caveat that in this study, the group with urethral catheterization did experience more total upper tract deterioration than other bladder management groups.

Lloyd et al. (1986) conducted a case control investigation reviewing a group of 204 SCI patients grouped according to urological management techniques as follows:  A) intermittent catheterization within 36h of injury, B) suprapubic trocar drainage within 36 h of injury, C) urethral catheter drainage for >36h prior to intermittent catheterization,  D) indwelling urethral catheter drainage throughout and after discharge from hospital and E) intermittent catheterization placed in community hospital. Overall, these authors found that the method of initial bladder management does not affect the incidence of UTI, genitourinary complications or frequency of urological procedures at 1 year after injury. The only exception was group D who had a greater rate of UTIs as a result of the prolonged placement of indwelling urethral catheter drainage throughout and after discharge from hospitalization. It should be noted that individual variations in bladder management methods following the initial method and up to the one year follow-up were not accounted for in this investigation representing a potential major confound.

As noted in several of these comparative investigations, complications occur most frequently in those with urethral catheterization.  Despite this, many patients resort to using urethral catheterization for convenience or necessity, if hand dexterity is insufficient, or care givers unaffordable.  Some investigators have suggested an approach to minimizing UTI  when urethral catheterization is determined to be the most viable management approach. Darouiche et al. (2006) conducted a multicentre RCT of hospital inpatients (n=118) in which the effect of securing indwelling catheters with a device called the Statlock as compared to traditional means of catheter securement (i.e., tape, velcro strap, cath-secure, or nothing) was assessed. In addition to SCI, 10 subjects had multiple sclerosis. In this trial, there was a statistically non-significant trend for a lower rate of symptomatic UTI (p=0.16) and also a lower incidence of symptomatic UTI per 1000 device days  (p=0.16) for those using this Statlock device versus the control group. 

Condom catheters also can be a source of bacterial colonization, especially of the perineum, which has been suggested by Sanderson and Weissler (1990b) to be significantly correlated with bacteriuria in SCI individuals.  By discontinuing night time use of an external condom drainage system in a prospective controlled trial involving SCI rehabilitation inpatients (n=119), Pseudomonas colonization of the urethra was found to be significantly reduced where Klebsiella colonization was not significantly affected (p<0.05) (Gilmore et al. 1992).  Further, a 3rd group of patients did not use a condom drainage system at any time and colonization rates for both Pseudomonas and Klebsiella were significantly lower in this group at all sites tested (urethra, perineum and rectum) as compared to those using the external drainage system (p<0.05). However, the prevalence of bacteriuria caused by either gram-negative bacilli, was not reduced with either night-time or continuous disuse of an external condom drainage system. 

Conclusion

  • There is level 2 evidence based on a single prospective controlled trial and supported by a case control study that intermittent catheterization may lead to a lower rate of UTI as compared to other bladder management techniques such as use of indwelling or suprapubic catheter.
  • There is level 3 evidence based on a single case control study that bladder management with a suprapubic as opposed to indwelling catheter may lead to a lower rate of UTI and reduced mortality in a poor, illiterate population where intermittent catheterization may not be viable as an approach to bladder management.
  • There is weak level 2 evidence based on a single low quality RCT that suggests that use of the Statlock device to secure indwelling and suprapubic catheters may lead to a lower rate of UTI.
  • There is level 2 evidence based on a single prospective controlled trial that suggests that removal of external condom drainage collection systems at night or for 24 hours/day might reduce perineal, urethral or rectal bacterial levels but have no effect on bacteriuria.
  • There is level 4 evidence based on a single case series that no bladder management method is advantageous in preventing pyelonephritis (though indwelling urethral catheterization does have the highest incidence of upper tract deterioration). However, the presence of reflux results in a 2.8 fold higher incidence of pyelonephritis.
  • Intermittent catheterization is associated with a lower rate of UTI as compared to use of indwelling or suprapubic catheter.
  • The Statlock device to secure indwelling and suprapubic catheters may lead to a lower rate of UTI.
  • Removal of external condom drainage collection systems at night or for 24 hours/day may reduce perineal, urethral or rectal bacterial levels but has no effect on bacteriuria.
  • The presence of vesicoureteral reflux likely has a greater impact on development of significant infections than the choice of bladder management.

Pharmacological and Other Biological Methods of UTI Prevention

There are a variety of approaches that involve pharmaceuticals and other biological agents that have been examined for UTI prevention in persons with SCI - as is noted in several reviews on this topic (Biering-Sorensen 2002; Garcia Leoni & Esclarin De Ruz 2003). These include pharmacological approaches such as bacterial interference or antibiotic prophylaxis, the use of other biological agents such as antiseptic cleansing agents or the use of nutraceuticals such as cranberry in one form or another.

Table 21 Bacterial Interference for Prevention of UTIs

Discussion

Bacterial interference has been touted as a promising approach to UTI prevention for the future (Biering-Sorensen 2002). In this approach, a group of bacteria that do not cause UTIs are introduced into the bladder which acts to limit the ability of other pathogens to effectively colonize the bladder and cause a symptomatic UTI. To date, the specific approach employed in studies in persons with SCI has been to colonize the bladder with E. coli 83972 (Hull et al. 2000; Darouiche et al. 2005; Prasad et al. 2009). Most notably, Darouiche et al. (2005) conducted a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial (n=27) in which they randomized persons with SCI of greater than 1 years duration and with a history of symptomatic UTIs to receive bladder inoculation of either E. coli 83972 or sterile normal saline at a 3:1 ratio. This was preceded by a one-week course of empirically selected antibiotics as it has been noted that successful colonization is more likely achieved with a sterile bladder (Hull et al. 2000). Patients were monitored over the following year with monthly urine cultures. The number of UTIs experienced by those with successful E. coli 83972 colonization had significantly fewer UTIs than those with saline inoculation or unsuccessful E. coli inoculation (1.6 vs 3.5 episodes/year, p =0.036). The period during which the bladder remained colonized by E. coli 83972 was variable among study participants with only 13 of 21 patients being successfully colonized for at least 1 month, 4 of these remaining colonized for the entire 1 year study period and 9 losing E. coli after an average of 3.5 months. It should be noted that statistical comparisons were made between those with successful colonization (n=13) vs those inoculated with saline (n=6) combined with those not successfully inoculated (n=8). Only 1 of the 13 participants successfully inoculated developed a UTI while E. coli 83972 was in the bladder and this was associated with another organism (P. aeruginosa). No adverse events were obtained with the E. coli 83972 inoculations although 1 person in the saline group developed autonomic dysreflexia which subsided post-inoculation.

Prasad et al. (2009) using a less robust pre-post study design, also reported that preinoculation antibiotics improved inoculation rates, and that rates of UTI went down during the period of colonization, and that colonization with E.coli 83972 is safe.

A longer period of colonization was achieved in the pre-post trial conducted by Hull et al. (2000) in which 21 individuals with longstanding SCI (> 18 months) with a history of symptomatic UTI over the preceding year were inoculated with E. coli 83972 following a course of appropriate antibiotics for 5-7 days. Persistent colonization of greater than 1 month was achieved in 13 study participants with mean colonization duration of 12.3 months (range 2-40 months).  No participant sustained a UTI while colonized with E. coli even though these same individuals had a mean of 3.1 UTIs over the previous year. UTIs were noted in 4 of 7 persons not successfully colonized and at a rate of 3.5 UTIs/year for the months following loss of colonization in those where E. coli 83972 was no longer found in the bladder. The overall results from these three studies point to a strong effectiveness associated with this approach while the bladder remains colonized but that more work is required to enhance the rate of successful inoculation and to examine methods for sustaining the period of colonization.  

Conclusion

  • There is level 1 evidence based on a single RCT and supported by two level 4 investigations that bacterial interference in the form of E. coli 83972 bladder inoculation may prevent UTIs.
  • E. coli 83972 bladder inoculation may prevent UTIs.

Table 22 Antibiotic Prophylaxis of UTIs

Discussion

Several investigations have been conducted which explore the effectiveness of a prophylactic antibiotic approach although cost and conflicting results along with issues of adverse events and increasing likelihood of enhancing resistant organisms have led reviewers to not recommend this approach for routine use(Garcia Leoni & Esclarin De Ruz 2003). Although researchers and clinicians have reservations about this approach, an obvious and important variable is the specific antibiotic that is used for prophylaxis. For the most part investigations in SCI patients have involved different dosages and regimens of orally administered ciprofloxacin or co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole or abbreviated as TMX-SMX) as prophylactic measures.

An RCT comparing low-dose, long-term treatment with ciprofloxacin (100mg each night) vs placebo concluded that ciprofloxacin prophylaxis for up to 39 months resulted in a marked reduction from the pre-study infection rate. (p<0.00005, corrected) with no severe side effects and only 1 instance of ciprofloxacin resistant E. coli found in the feces of 1 patient (Biering-Sorensen et al. 1994). Another RCT involved a 3 day course of ciprofloxacin (500 mg bid) or suitable placebo as a pre-cursor to urodynamic investigation (Darouiche et al. 1994) which has been associated with subsequent development of UTI (Pannek & Nehiba 2007). Of those receiving ciprofloxacin, none had a symptomatic UTI at the study follow-up visit (3-5 days post urodynamic testing), whereas 3 of 22 study participants (14%) in the placebo group developed a symptomatic UTI. This finding was statistically nonsignificant (p=0.24), but the trend for reduced UTI incidence and the fact that no subjects in the treatment group actually developed a UTI suggests that a study with greater power would be required to demonstrate the benefit of pre-urodynamic testing prophylaxis more conclusively.

Conflicting results have been obtained across separate controlled trials conducted in individuals undergoing acute SCI inpatient rehabilitation of sustained (i.e., > 3 months) prophylaxis with TMP-SMX. Gribble and Puterman (1993) reported that oral administration of a TMP (40mg) - SMX (200mg)  formulation once daily was found to significantly reduce frequency and relapse rates of bacteriuria (p=0.0001) and symptomatic urinary tract infection (p=0.0003) in persons with recent SCI using intermittent catheterization for bladder management (n=129). Conversely, Sandock et al. (1995) reported on an investigation of patients at least 6 months post-injury within an inpatient SCI rehabilitation program in which the standard of care was to prescribe TMP-SMX liberally as a prophylaxis. This practice was stopped for the purpose of conducting a prospective controlled trial in 1 of 2 units and it was noted that there was no significant difference in the number of symptomatic UTIs between those stopping vs those continuing suppressive therapy (0.043 vs 0.035 UTIs/week, p>0.5). In addition, there was a significant decrease in the emergence of TMP-SMX resistant asymptomatic bacteriuria in the patients stopping suppressing therapy (78.8% vs 94.1%, p<0.05). This latter finding was also consistent with that noted by Gribble and Puterman (1993) who noted this, along with TMP-SMX related adverse events as serious limitations of TMP-SMX prophylaxis therapy. Reid et al. (1994b) also showed an inability of a higher dose of TMP (160mg)-SMX(800mg) to reduce rates of symptomatic UTI within a prospective controlled trial conducted on a rehabilitation unit in patients using intermittent catheterization for bladder management.

Given the conflicting findings noted above and in other patient groups, a novel approach to UTI prevention in SCI patients was undertaken by Salomon et al. (2006). After a prospective, pre-post study with 2 year follow-up, they concluded that a weekly oral cyclic antibiotic (WOCA) program was beneficial in preventing UTI in SCI patients, decreasing antibiotic consumption and decreasing the number and length of hospitalizations, without severe adverse events or the emergence of multi-drug resistant (MDR) bacteria. The WOCA regimen involved alternating between two antibiotics, administered once per week over at least 2 years. The specific antibiotics selected as prophylaxis were customized to the patient, chosen based on allergy and antimicrobial susceptibility. The most frequent combination of antibiotics utilized were trimethoprim / sulfamethoxazole and cefixime (30%) followed by cefixime and nitrofurantoin (25%). The combination of antibiotics was modified in 40% of the patients once, 20% twice and 10% on three occasions during the follow-up. This level 4 evidence for the effectiveness of WOCA in SCI UTI prevention, treatment and cost, and would serve well as guidance in design of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to confirm these results.

Conclusion

  • There is level 1 evidence from a single RCT that low-dose, long-term ciprofloxacin may prevent symptomatic UTI.
  • There is level 1 evidence from a single RCT that TMP-SMX as prophylaxis may reduce symptomatic UTI rates although conflicting findings were obtained from 2 prospective controlled trials. The potential for emergence of drug resistant bacteria and TMP-SMX related adverse events further limit the potential use of TMP-SMX for prophylaxis.
  • There is level 4 evidence from a single study that suggests weekly oral cyclic antibiotic use, customized as to individual allergy and antimicrobial susceptibility, may be effective for UTI prevention in SCI patients. 
  • Ciprofloxacin may be indicated for UTI prophylaxis in SCI but further research is needed to support its use.
  • Long-term use of TMP-SMX is not recommended for sustained use as a suppressive therapy for UTI prevention.
  • A weekly oral cyclic antibiotic, customized to the individual, may be beneficial in preventing UTI in SCI.

Table 23 Antiseptic and Related Approaches for Preventing UTIs

Discussion

It is generally accepted that good hygiene practices are an important element in UTI prevention. Therefore, it is a natural extension to expect that antiseptic agents applied either directly to the bladder or to potential vectors of indirect transference might be effective in UTI prevention. Accordingly, Sanderson and Weissler (1990b) found that perineal colonization of SCI individuals was significantly correlated with bacteriuria and may be associated with contamination of the environment and indirectly of the hands of patients and staff.  As a result of this finding, this group further examined the effect of chlorhexidine antisepsis on bacteriuria, perineal colonization and environmental contamination in spinally injured patients requiring intermittent catheterization (Sanderson & Weissler 1990a).  In male patients not receiving antibiotics, daily body washing in chlorhexidine and application of chlorhexidine cream to the penis after every catheterization significantly reduced bacteriuria to 60% from 74% in patients who were only washed with standard soap, although the effect was not as strong as that delivered by treatment with appropriate antibiotics.  Chlorhexidine antisepsis alone did not affect perineal coliform colonization or contamination of the environment although there was a trend for this effect (p<0.1). In essence, this antiseptic effect acted to amplify the bacteria-reducing effects of antibiotics.

Acidifying urinary pH for the prevention of UTIs is based on the established fact that pH reduction to ≤5.0 will inhibit growth of urinary E. coli (Shohl & Janney 1917), a prevalent pathogen in the urinary tract. An RCT conducted by Waites et al. (2006) on participants having indwelling or suprapubic catheter with existing bacteriuria and pyuria (n=89) compared sterile saline, acetic acid and neomycin-polymyxin solution bladder irrigants and demonstrated no effect on the degree of bacteriuria/pyuria, or development of antimicrobial resistance. Moreover, the twice daily bladder irrigation for 8 weeks resulted in a significant increase in urinary pH (p=0.01) for all groups to a range that was more favourable for the growth of E. coli (i.e., pH 6.0-7.0).Similarly, 2 weeks of phosphate supplementation or 2 gram per day of ascorbic acid for unspecified duration in SCI neurogenic bladder managed with IC or indwelling catheter have proved ineffective in acidifying urine or altering UTI rates (Schlager et al. 2005; Castello et al. 1996).

Feasibility of treatment is a valid issue for consideration as evidenced by the study conducted by Pearman et al. (1988). These investigators compared the use of trisdine with kanamycin-colistin, a medicated bladder instillation previously demonstrated to be effective to prevent bacteriuria and UTI in SCI (Pearman 1979). In this trial (n=18), they found no difference between incidence of bacteriuria in catheterized patients yet concluded that trisdine was preferred based on its stability at room temperature, association with a reduced likelihood for antibiotic-resistant bacteria and reduced cost compared to kanamycin-colistin. Although the latter are important factors for treatment choice, this study presents no evidence for preferential beneficial effects based on incidence of bacteriuria. 

Another solution shown to have some promise in UTI prevention was studied as a combination therapy, both with antiseptic properties. Krebs et al. (1984) investigated the potential of a 5% hemiacidrin solution instilled as an intravesicular acidifying agent at each intermittent catheterization combined with oral administration of methenamine mandelate (2 mg) qid in persons undergoing SCI inpatient rehabilitation. As compared to individuals undergoing no bacterial prophylaxis, the pH of urine was significantly reduced (p<0.01) and there was a lower rate of symptomatic UTI (p<0.05) and less bacteriuria as indicated by a reduced number of positive cultures (p<0.001). The role of hemiacidrin solution alone in these findings remains uncertain.

 In contrast to these findings, as part of a double-blind, placebo-controlled RCT (n=305) conducted by Lee et al. (2007), oral methenamine hippurate (another formulation of methenamine as an antiseptic) was generally ineffective in preventing symptomatic UTIs. In this well-conducted large sample trial, active and placebo formulations (oral tablet) of both methenamine hippurate and a cranberry preparation were compared as to the occurrence of asymptomatic UTI (up to 6 months) as a primary end-point. There were no statistically significant effects with either treatment alone or in combination as compared to placebo. 

These various conflicting results suggest the specific antiseptic agent, alone or in combination with others, and its mode of administration might be important in determining clinical effectiveness and that the practice of antiseptic bladder instillation along with other methods of delivery, dismissed as ineffective by some or in general practice by others (Pearman et al. 1988; Castello et al. 1996; Schlager et al. 2005; Lee et al. 2007), requires further study.

Conclusion

  • There is level 1 evidence based on a single RCT that oral methenamine hippurate, either alone or in combination with cranberry, is not effective for UTI prevention.
  • There is level 2 evidence from separate studies that bladder irrigation with trisdine, kanamycin-colistin or a 5% hemiacidrin solution combined with oral methenamine mandelate (2 mg qid) may be effective for UTI prevention.
  • There are varying levels of evidence that bladder irrigation with neomycin/polymyxin (level 1), acetic acid (level 1), ascorbic acid (level 2) or phosphate supplementation (level 4) is not effective for UTI prevention.
  • There is level 2 evidence based on a single low quality RCT that supports the use of daily body washing with chlorohexidine and application of chlorhexidine cream to the penis after every catheterization versus using standard soap to reduce bacteriuria and perineal colonization.
  • Oral methenamine hippurate, either alone or in combination with cranberry, is not effective for UTI prevention.
  • The antiseptic agents delivered via bladder irrigation (5% hemiacidrin solution combined with oral methenamine mandelate) may be effective for UTI prevention, whereas others are not (i.e., trisdine, kanamycin-colistin, neomycin/polymyxin, acetic acid, ascorbic acid and phosphate supplementation).
  • Daily body washing with chlorohexidine and application of chlorhexidine cream to the penis after every catheterization instead of using standard soap may reduce bacteriuria and perineal colonization.

Table 24 Cranberry for Preventing UTIs

Discussion

Cranberry (in various forms) is in widespread use for UTI prevention and many clinicians recommend it for this purpose. This remains the fact despite uncertainty as to its effectiveness, especially in persons requiring ongoing catheterization as reported in a recent Cochrane systematic review (Jepson & Craig 2008). However, also in 2008, Hess et al. conducted a study in which subjects were given either cranberry tablets or placebo for 6 months, and then crossed to the opposite arm, showing a significant reduction in UTI incidence for those on cranberry treatment.  These authors chose a robust definition of UTI (see above), and explained in their conclusion that they presume the treatment effect arose from an effect on cell wall adherence to the uroepithelial cell wall, an effect that they propose takes > 1 month to develop.  As such, shorter studies may fail to note benefit from cranberry treatment (see Linsemeyer et al. 2004).  While Reid et al. 2001 is a short study, significant results were noted in biofilm load and bacterial adhesion (though this study was not designed to determine effect on significant UTI). These hypotheses help build our understanding of the potential mechanisms of action cranberry may have in preventing UTI.

As noted in the section on antiseptic agents above, Lee et al. (2007) conducted a well-designed double-blind, placebo-controlled RCT (n=305) that examined the effectiveness of cranberry tablets (1600 mg) for UTI prevention alone or in combination with oral methenamine hippurate (2 g). Neither treatment alone or in combination was effective in preventing symptomatic UTIs as assessed over a 6 month study period. This rigorous study incorporated intention-to-treat and multiple analysis methods including survival analysis and multivariate analysis using Cox proportional hazards regression and investigated outcomes associated with both symptomatic UTIs (primary) and bacteriuria (secondary). 

These results were confirmed by two additional RCTs. Linsenmeyer et al. (2004) found that cranberry tablets (400 mg) were not effective in changing bacterial or white blood cell (WBC) counts of 21 participants who underwent a 9 week placebo-controlled, crossover trial.  Similar results were obtained by Waites et al. (2004) in community residing persons with SCI of greater than 1 years duration (n=48) which showed no difference between cranberry extract or placebo taken for 6 months in reducing bacteriuria or pyuria nor for reducing symptomatic UTI rates.

In contrast to these findings, a prospective controlled trial (n=15) conducted by Reid et al. (2001) showed that cranberry juice intake significantly reduced the adhesion of bacteria to bladder cells whereas water intake did not significantly reduce the bacterial adhesion or biofilm presence in individuals with SCI. These conflicting conclusions may be influenced by the variation in “dose” and formulation of cranberry product (i.e., tablet vs juice) and the outcome measures used across the various studies. Notably, this study (Reid et al. 2001) was not designed or intended to assess the effect of cranberry on asymptomatic UTI.

Hess et al. (2008) comment in their discussion that subjects in the Waites study may have been non-compliant given that study medication was mailed to subjects, that the UTI definition may not have been as robust, and that there was an imbalance in bladder management methods between groups.  It is important to be note that Hess, Linsenmeyer, and Waites lack intent-to-treat statistical analyses which therefore reduces the quality of these investigations. The lack of consistency between results underscores the need for yet further efforts to convincingly prove or disprove the potential value of cranberry prophylaxis. 

Conclusion

  • There is conflicting level 1 evidence across 4 RCTs (1 +ive, 3 –ive) to support the effectiveness of cranberry in preventing UTI in patients with neurogenic bladder due to SCI.
  • It is uncertain if cranberry is effective in preventing UTIs in persons with SCI.

Educational Interventions for Maintaining a Healthy Bladder and Preventing UTIs

SCI patients with neurogenic bladder typically receive education while in initial rehabilitation to assist with bladder management and maintain a healthy bladder. This may continue as their bladder function changes following rehabilitation discharge.

Table 25 Individual Studies of Educational Interventions

Discussion

Health care providers have an excellent opportunity to provide proper bladder management education during inpatient rehabilitation to significantly affect the quality of bladder management after discharge with the goal of assisting clients in maintaining a healthy bladder, often manifest through prevention of UTIs.  Anderson et al. (1983) reported on a case-control study where patients completed a special urinary tract care education program consisting of classes, reading material, written examinations, and demonstration of acquired skills. With this approach 71% of patients were asymptomatic of UTI at 6 month follow-up.  Only 32% of patients had no symptoms when a group of patients, tested 4 years earlier in 1975, did not undergo the education program.  Furthermore, as a result of the education program only 5% of the educated group lost time from their usual daily activities compared to 23% of the non-educated group losing time.  However, both groups registered the same incidence of confirmed or suspected UTI (62-63%).  Therefore, the benefit translated into early detection and definitive action resulting in less impairment and less lost time due to the UTI. This study was assessed as comprising Level 4 evidence due to inadequate control of potential confounds between the education and non-education group among other limitations.

Once discharged, some SCI patients experience unacceptable recurrence of UTIs. Cardenas et al. (2004) examined the effectiveness of an educational program in an RCT of 56 community-dwelling SCI patients with a self-reported history of UTIs.  The educational intervention included written material, a self-administered test, a review by nurse and physician, and a follow-up telephone call.  The control group did not receive the intervention and final interventional data was compared to an equivalent baseline period.  A significant decrease in urine bacterial colony count (but not in UTI incidence) and increased Multidimensional Health Locus of Control scale score reflected the beneficial effects of UTI educational intervention in improving bladder health and the patient’s perception of control over their own health behaviour. 

These results were amplified by Hagglund et al. (2005) and Barber et al. (1999), who each examined participants with longstanding SCI and conducted their investigations in conjunction with outpatient rehabilitation follow-up services. Positive benefits of reduced UTI occurrences were seen following a 6 hour physician-mediated educational workshop conducted as part of a prospective controlled trial with 6 month follow-up periods (n=60) (Hagglund et al. 2005).  Of note, Hagglund et al. (2005) directed their educational intervention at the consumer-personal assistant dyad.

Barber et al. (1999) identified 17 high risk patients (i.e., ≥ 2 UTI/6months) over 1000 consecutive outpatient SCI clinic days. These authors found that 11 (65%) of these patients were able to reduce their number of UTIs to be reclassified as not high-risk with intensive counseling on proper bladder management technique and hygiene, although 8 required multiple counseling sessions to realize an effective reduction of number of UTIs. The remaining patients in this series required pharmaceutical prophylaxis for UTI prevention although there were some issues with compliance when treatment was extended over 1 year. The authors suggested that education intervention by a clinic nurse is a simple, cost-effective means of decreasing the risk of UTIs in at-risk SCI individuals, although the sample size was small and the study was neither randomized nor controlled.

Conclusion

  • There is level 1 evidence from a single RCT that a single educational session conducted by SCI specialist health professionals with accompanying written materials and a single follow-up telephone call can result in reduced urine bacterial colony counts in community-dwelling individuals with prior history of SCI.
  • The beneficial effects of education mediated by SCI specialist health professionals on reducing UTI risk in community-dwelling individuals with SCI are supported by a single level 2 study and two level 4 studies incorporating different features such as one-on one or group workshops, demonstrations, practice of techniques and written materials.
  • There is no evidence assessing the relative effectiveness of different educational approaches for reducing UTI risk. 
  • A variety of bladder management education programs are effective in reducing UTI risk in community-dwelling persons with SCI, although limited information exists as to the most effective approaches.

Pharmacological Treatment of UTIs

UTIs in persons with SCI with neurogenic bladder are termed “complicated UTIs” which refers to the presence of a UTI in a functionally, metabolically, or anatomically abnormal urinary tract or that are caused by pathogens that are resistant to antibiotics (Stamm & Hooton 1993). Complicated UTIs may be caused by a much wider variety of pathogens in persons with SCI and are often polymicrobial. It is generally recommended that persons with SCI be treated for bacteriuria only if they have symptoms, as many individuals especially with indwelling or suprapubic catheters typically have asymptomatic bacteriuria (Biering-Sorensen et al. 2001). Once symptomatic UTI is confirmed, the first line of empirical treatment is via antibiotics and the most common antibiotics chosen for UTI treatment include fluorquinolones (e.g. ciprofloxacin), trimethorprin, sufamethoxazole, amoxicillin, nitrofurantoin and ampicillin.  Fluorquinolones are often chosen because of their effectiveness over a wide spectrum of bacterial strains (Waites et al. 1991; Garcia Leoni & Esclarin De Ruz 2003). Although much experience with treating UTIs in SCI has been gleaned from other indications, there are several studies that are reviewed below which have investigated a variety of antibiotic agents in this population.

Table 26 Antibiotics in Treatment of UTIs

Discussion

The range of effective antibiotic treatment duration can vary widely depending on the specific microorganism causing the infection, the antibiotic used and the patients’ UTI history. Dow et al. (2004) conducted a RCT (n=60) to compare a 14 vs 3 day course of ciprofloxin treatment in SCI patients with UTI symptoms or microbially documented bacteriuria and concluded that a 14 day Ciprofloxin treatment results in improved clinical and microbiological outcomes.   Microbiological relapse rates were significantly lower for those patients treated for 14 vs 3 days.  Although, this high quality level 1 evidence advocates for the use of a 14 vs 3 day course of ciprofloxacin in SCI UTI, as the author notes, it does not address the optimal treatment period which may be 5, 7 or 10 days nor does it examine the question of whether a higher dose might have been more effective with the shorter therapy.

Ofloxacin is a fluoroquinolone antibiotic shown to be promising in its ability to penetrate and eradicate bacterial biofilms in the bladder in vitro and in SCIpatients (Reid et al. 1994a; Reid et al. 1994b). Bacterial biofilms are colonies of microorganisms along with their extracellular products that may form on surfaces as a structured community that enables the pathogens to resist antibiotics and persist in the urinary tract thereby potentially causing recurrent UTI (Biering-Sorensen et al. 2003).  Reid et al. (2000) employed a randomized, double blind design (n=42) to assess the relative effectiveness of a 7 day course of ofloxacin as compared to trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) or other more appropriate antibiotics as detected by culture sensitivity. Study participants had symptomatic UTI and clinical cure rates, defined as patients becoming asymptomatic with sterile urine, were assessed at day 4 and day 7.Clinical cure rate was significantly greater for Ofloxacin as compared to TMP-SMX or other antibiotic at day 4 (90% vs 48%, p=0.003) and day 7 (90% vs 57%, p=0.015). In addition, both treatments were effective at reducing bacterial biofilms at day 4 and 7 (p<.001) although the biofilm eradication rate was significantly higher with Ofloxacin vs TMP-SMX or other antibiotic at day 4 (62% vs 24%, p=.005); and day 7 (67% vs 35%, p=.014). This finding was supported by an earlier study (Reid et al. 1994a) noting that fluoroquinolone therapy was more effective at reducing bladder cell adhesion counts in 63% of asymptomatic SCI UTIs vs 44% of SCI subjects treated with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.   

Reid et al. (2000) suggested that a 3-day regimen in the treatment of SCI UTI could be sufficient based on significant biofilm eradication detected in bladder epithelial cells in patients treated with Ofloxacin compared to TMP-SMX. Shorter courses of antibiotic treatment are currently considered by clinicians and patients who are concerned with side effects, cost and antimicrobial resistance due to longer term use. Treatment course durations as short 3 days are not uncommon while the more common treatment duration is 14 days.  The difference in effective treatment duration, compared to the findings of Dow et al. (2004), is due, in part, to the difference in anti-microbial used.  However, further study comparing the 2 antimicrobials (and others) and differing treatment durations are required to clarify the question of optimum treatment duration for the antimicrobial being considered for use.

Gram-negative bacteria such as Pseudomonas, Acinetobacter, Enterobacter and mycobacteria are susceptible to aminoglycosides such as tobramycin and amikacin which may be chosen for complicated UTI treatment.  Due to their toxicity and inconvenient route of administration (i.e. intramuscular injection), their use is limited.  To investigate the effectiveness of a lower dose of these aminoglycosides, Sapico et al. (1980) compared infection, persistence and reinfection rates of SCI UTI against a standard dose.  An overall low rate of success and no differences between the dose strengths and between tobramycin and amikacin even though high antibiotic concentrations were found in the urine of all subjects suggested that alternative antimicrobial agents would be better to consider for use in this population.

Although Waites et al. (1991) showed norfloxacin, another fluoroquinolone, to be 73% effective in eradicating UTIs by mid-treatment, the rate of reinfection was 84% after 8 to 12 weeks post initial eradication. Furthermore, 16% of strains isolated after eradication became resistant to norfloxacin. This trial, employing a pre-post study design (n=78) with a 14 day course of treatment, enrolled participants with symptomatic UTI and the equivocal results point to the utility of controlled study designs when assessing antibiotic effectiveness. The authors concluded that norfloxacin is a reasonable treatment choice for SCI UTI but the subsequent and problematic emergence of resistance must be monitored (as with other antimicrobials).  

In addition to decisions on selecting the most appropriate antibiotic, the clinician is sometimes faced with additional treatment option challenges when multi-drug resistant bacteria or the patient’s allergy to the appropriate antibiotic are encountered. Although conflicting results have been obtained with the use of antiseptic agents as part of a prophylactic strategy to lower urine pH and thereby assist in the prevention of UTIs, Linsenmeyer et al. (1999) used a case series review (n=10) to investigate the use of medicated bladder irrigation as a method to alter the existing antimicrobial resistance. They found that intermittent neomycin/polymyxin bladder irrigation was effective in altering the resistance of the offending bladder organism(s) to allow for appropriate antibiotic treatment, therefore proving preliminary evidence advocating for a short course treatment of neomycin/polymyxin irrigant to alter existing antimicrobial resistance.

Conclusion

  • There is level 1 evidence from a single RCT that supports the use of 14 vs 3 days of Ciprofloxcin for improved clinical and microbiological outcomes in the treatment of UTI in persons with SCI. 
  • There is level 1 evidence from a single RCT suggesting that 3 or 7 day Ofloxacin treatment is more effective than trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in treating UTI and results in significant bladder bacterial biofilm eradication in persons with SCI patients. 
  • Level 4 evidence from a single study suggests that norfloxacin may be a reasonable treatment choice for UTI in SCI but subsequent resistance must be monitored.
  • A low success rate of aminoglycosides in the treatment of SCI UTI is supported by level 1 evidence from a single RCT.
  • Optimum antimicrobial treatment duration and dosage is uncertain due to the lack of comparative trials in persons with SCI.
  • Level 4 evidence is reported for intermittent neomycin/polymyxin bladder irrigation being effective in altering the resistance of the offending bladder organism(s) to allow for appropriate antibiotic treatment.
  • Ciprofloxin administered over 14 (vs 3) days may result in improved clinical and microbiological SCI UTI treatment outcome.
  • Ofloxacin administered over either a 3 or 7 day treatment regimen may result in significant SCI UTI cure and bladder bacterial biofilm eradication rate, moreso than trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.
  • Norfloxacin may be a reasonable treatment choice for UTI in SCI but subsequent resistance must be monitored.
  • Aminoglycosides have a low success rate in the treatment of SCI UTI.
  • Intermittent neomycin/polymyxin bladder irrigation may be effective in altering the resistance of the offending bladder organism(s) to allow for appropriate antibiotic treatment.

Summary

  • Level 1 evidence from a single RCT supports the use of propiverine to treat detrusor hyperreflexia by significantly improving bladder capacity.
  • Level 1 evidence from a single RCT supports the use of tolterodine vs placebo to significantly increase intermittent catheterization volumes and decrease incontinence in neurogenic detrusor overactivity.
  • There is level 2 evidence from a single open label prospective controlled trial that  tolterodine and oxybutynin are equally efficacious in SCI patients with neurogenic detrusor overactivity except that tolterodine results in less dry mouth.
  • Level 4 evidence from a single pre-post trial supports the potential benefits of controlled-release oxybutynin. 
  • Level 1 evidence from a single RCT supports the use of trospium chloride to increase bladder capacity and compliance, and decrease bladder pressure with very few side effects in SCI individuals with neurogenic bladder.
  • Level 1 evidence based on two RCTs supports the use of Botox A injections into the detrusor muscle to provide targeted treatment for detrusor hyperreflexia and urge incontinence resistant to high-dose oral anticholinergic treatments with intermittent self-catheterization in SCI. 
  • Level 1 evidence supports the use of vanillanoid compounds such as capsaicin or resiniferatoxin to increase maximum bladder capacity and decrease urinary frequency and leakages in neurogenic detrusor overactivity of spinal origin.
  • Level 4 evidence exists to suggest that intravesical capsaicin instillation in bladders of SCI individuals does not increase the rate of common bladder cancers after 5 years of use. 
  • Level 1 evidence supports the use of N/OFG, a nociceptin orphan peptide receptor agonist for the treatment of neurogenic bladder in SCI.
  • There is level 4 evidence from 3 studies that instillations with oxybutinun or propantheline have equivocal benefits for neurogenic bladder in people with SCI. This lack of effect may be compounded by level 4 evidence suggesting systemic absorption may occur with this therapy, resulting in systemic side effects.
  • There is level 1 evidence from a single small RCT (n=10) that intrathecal baclofen may be beneficial for bladder function improvement in individuals with SCI when oral pharmacological interventions are insufficient.
  • Level 4 evidence is available from a single, small (n=9), case series study for the use of intra-thecal clonidine to improve detrussor hyperreflexia in individuals with SCI when a combination of oral treatment and sterile intermittent catheterization are insufficient.
  • There is level 4 evidence from three studies that surgical augmentation of bladder (ileocystoplasty) may result in enhanced bladder capacity under lower filling pressure and improved continence in persons with SCI who previously did not respond well to conservative approaches for overactive bladder.
  • Level 1 evidence suggests that moxisylyte decreases maximum urethral closure pressure by 47.6% at 10 minutes after an optimum dose of 0.75mg/kg in individuals with SCI.
  • There is level 1 evidence from a single study that suggests that tamsulosin may improve bladder neck relaxation and subsequent urine flow in SCI individuals. 
  • There is level 4 evidence (two studies, n=28 & 9) that  supports terazosin as an alternative treatment for bladder neck dysfunction in SCI individuals provided that side effects and drug tolerance are monitored.
  • There is level 4 evidence derived from a single, case series study involving 46 subjects (41 completers) that indicates some potential for phenoxybenzamine as an adjunct treatment for neuropathic bladder following SCI, when tapping or crede is insufficient to achieve residual urine volume of <100mL. Further evidence in required.
  • Level 4 evidence from 1 small retrospective chart review suggests that 6 months of alpha 1-blocker therapy may improve upper tract stasis secondary to SCI in men by decreasing the duration of involuntary contractions.
  • There is level 1 evidence from a single RCT with support from several additional controlled and uncontrolled trials that botulinum toxin injected into the external urinary sphincter may be effective in improving outcomes associated with bladder emptying in persons with neurogenic bladder due to SCI
  • There is level 2 evidence from a single trial that transurethral botulinum toxin injections were significantly more effective in reducing maximum urethral pressure than transperineal injections in persons with neurogenic bladder due to SCI.
  • There is level 4 evidence that indwelling urethral catheterization is associated with a higher rate of acute urological complications than intermittent catheterization.
  • There is level 4 evidence that prolonged indwelling catheterization, whether suprapubic or urethral, may result in a higher long-term rate of urological and renal complications than intermittent catheterization, condom catheterization or triggered spontaneous voiding.
  • There is level 4 evidence that intermittent catheterization, whether performed acutely or chronically, has the lowest complication rate.
  • Results are conflicting about the complications associated with chronic use of a spontaneous triggered voiding but some authors present level 4 evidence that this method has comparable long-term complication rates to intermittent catheterization.
  • There is level 4 evidence that those who use intermittent catheterization at discharge from rehabilitation may have difficulty continuing, especially those with tetraplegia and complete injuries. To a lesser degree females also have more difficulty than males in maintaining compliance with IC procedures.
  • There is level 1 evidence based on 1 RCT that pre-lubricated hydrophilic catheters are associated with fewer UTIs and reduced incidence of urethral bleeding and microtrauma as compared to conventional Poly Vinyl Chloride catheters.
  • There is level 2 evidence based on 1 RCT that fewer UTIs, but not necessarily urethral bleeding may result with the use of hydrophilic catheters as compared to conventional PVC catheters.
  • There is level 4 evidence that urethral complications and epididymoorchitis occurs more frequently in those using IC programs for bladder emptying, but the advantages of improved upper tract outcome over those with indwelling catheters outweigh these disadvantages.
  • There is level 4 evidence that using a portable ultrasound device reduces the frequency and cost of intermittent catheterizations.
  • There is level 4 evidence that triggering mechanisms such as the Valsalva or Crede maneuvers may assist some individuals with neurogenic bladder in emptying their bladders without catheterization. However, high intra-vesical voiding pressures can occur which could conceivably lead to renal complications.
  • There is level 4 evidence that despite a significant incidence of urological and renal complications associated with acute and chronic indwelling suprapubic catheterization, this may still a reasonable choice for bladder management for people with poor hand function, lack of care-giver assistance, severe lower limb spasticity, urethral disease, and persistent incontinence with urethral catheterization.
  • There is level 4 evidence that those with indwelling catheters are at higher risk for bladder cancer than those with non-indwelling catheter management programs.  Screening for cancer may require routine biopsy as well as cystoscopy.
  • There is level 4 evidence that condom drainage can be associated with urinary tract infection and upper tract deterioration.
  • There is level 4 evidence that penile implants may allow easier use of condom catheters, thereby reducing incontinence and improving sexual function.
  • There is level 4 evidence that most individuals who receive catheterizable stomas become newly continent and can self-catheterize.  It appears possible that this surgical intervention could protect upper tract function.  Larger studies are needed to better evaluate true incidence of complications, and long-term bladder and renal outcome.
  • There is level 4 evidence that most individuals undergoing cutaneous ileal conduit (ileo-ureterostomy) diversion became newly continent and were more satisfied than with their previous bladder management method. Long-term follow-up demonstrated the presence of a high incidence of urological or renal complications.
  • There is level 4 evidence from eight studies that ongoing use of sacral anterior root stimulation (accompanied in most cases by posterior sacral rhizotomy) is an effective method of bladder emptying resulting in reduced incontinence for the majority of those implanted. This is associated with increased bladder capacity and reduced post-void residual volume.
  • There is level 4 evidence from five studies that sacral anterior root stimulation (accompanied in most cases by posterior sacral rhizotomy) may be associated with reducing UTIs and autonomic dysreflexia.
  • There is level 4 evidence from two studies that direct bladder stimulation may result in reduced incontinence, increased bladder capacity and reduced residual volumes but requires further study as to its potential clinical use.
  • There is level 4 evidence from various single studies that other forms of neuroanatomically-related stimulation (e.g., electrical stimulation to posterior sacral, dorsal penile or clitoral nerve or surface magnetic sacral stimulation or direct bladder stimulation) may result in increased bladder capacity but require further study as to their potential clinical use. Further development involving this approach may permit sacral anterior root stimulation without the need for posterior root ablation.
  • There is level 4 evidence from a single study that epidural dorsal spinal cord stimulation at T1 or T11 originally intended for reducing muscle spasticity may have little effect on bladder function.
  • There is level 4 evidence from a single study that a program of functional electrical stimulation exercise involving the quadriceps muscle originally intended for enhancing muscle function and reducing muscle spasticity has only marginal (if any) effects on bladder function.
  • There is level 4 evidence from a single case-series study that sphincterotomy is effective in reducing episodes of autonomic dysreflexia associated with inadequate voiding.
  • There is level 4 evidence from a single case-series study that sphincterotomy, as a staged intervention, can provide long-term satisfactory bladder function.
  • There is level 2 evidence from a single low-quality RCT but supported by level 4 studies that both sphincterotomy and implantation of a sphincteric stent are effective in reducing incontinence, with little need for subsequent catheterization, and both treatments are associated with reduced detrusor pressure and reduced post-void residual volume but not with changes in bladder capacity. The only significant difference in these 2 treatments was the reduced initial hospitalization associated with the stent, given the lesser degree of invasiveness.
  • There is level 4 evidence that implantation of a sphincteric stent may result in reduced incidence of UTIs and bladder-related autonomic dysreflexia over the short-term although several studies have demonstrated the potential for various complications and subsequent need for re-insertion or another approach over the long-term.
  • There is level 4 evidence from a single long-term follow-up study of those having a previous sphincterotomy that the incidence of various upper and lower tract urological complications may be quite high.
  • There is level 4 evidence from a single case-series study that advocates for placement of a temporary stent early after injury as a reversible option that allows patients to choose from the range of permanent stent placement to less invasive bladder management methods such as intermittent catheterization.
  • There is level 4 evidence based on a single study that transurethral balloon dilation of the external sphincter may permit removal of indwelling catheters in place of condom drainage, and also be associated with reduced detrusor pressure and post-void residual volume but not with changes in bladder capacity.
  • There is level 4 evidence based on a single study that implantation of artificial urinary sphincter may be useful in the treatment of incontinence in SCI but further study is required.
  • There is level 2 evidence from a single study that early treatment with electroacupuncture may shorten the time that it takes to develop low pressure voiding /emptying with minimal residual volume, when combined with conventional methods of bladder management. 
  • Level 4 evidence from two studies suggests that intranasal DDVAP may reduce nocturnal urine production with fewer night-time emissions and also may reduce the need for more frequent catheterizations in persons with SCI with neurogenic bladder that is otherwise unresponsive to conventional therapy.
  • There is level 4 evidence from four studies that nerve crossover surgery (anastomosis of more rostral ventral nerve roots to S2-S3 spinal nerve roots) may result in improved bladder function in chronic SCI. 
  • Level 1 evidence based on a single RCTon SCI inpatients suggests that both limited and full microbial investigation result in adequate clinical response to UTI treatment with antibiotics.  Therefore the cost savings attributed to a limited microbial investigation favours this practice in the investigation of UTI although more rigorous investigation of the patient outcomes and attributed costs is needed.
  • There is limited level 1 evidence from a single investigation that refrigeration (up to 24 hours) of urine samples prior to sample processing does not alter urinalysis or urine culture results in SCI patients.
  • There is limited level 2 evidence from a single investigation that fewer false positive tests showing bacteriuria occur if indwelling or suprapubic catheters are changed prior to collection for urine culture analysis.
    There is conflicting level 4 evidence from two investigations concerning whether dipstick testing for nitrates or leukocyte esterase is recommended to guide treatment decision-making.
  • Level 2 evidence based on two RCTs suggests no difference in UTI rates between sterile vs clean approaches to intermittent catheterization during inpatient rehabilitation, although using a sterile method is significantly more costly.
    There is limited level 4 evidence from a single study that there is no difference in UTI rates between intermittent catheterization conducted by the patients themselves or by a specialized team during inpatient rehabilitation.
  • There is limited level 4 evidence from a single study that similar rates of UTI may be seen for those using clean intermittent catheterization during inpatient rehabilitation as compared to those using similar technique over a much longer time when living in the community.
  • There is limited level 4 evidence from a single study that differences in residual urine volume ranging from 0-153 ml were not associated with differences in UTI during inpatient rehabilitation.
  • There is level 1 evidence based on 1 RCT that pre-lubricated nonhydrophilic catheters are associated with fewer UTIs as compared to conventional Poly Vinyl Chloride catheters.
  • There is level 2 evidence based on 1 RCT that fewer UTIs, but not necessarily urethral bleeding may result with the use of hydrophilic catheters as compared to conventional PVC catheters.
  • There is level 2 evidence based on a single prospective controlled trial and supported by a case control study that intermittent catheterization may lead to a lower rate of UTI as compared to other bladder management techniques such as use of indwelling or suprapubic catheter.
  • There is level 3 evidence based on a single case control study that bladder management with a suprapubic as opposed to indwelling catheter may lead to a lower rate of UTI and reduced mortality in a poor, illiterate population where intermittent catheterization may not be viable as an approach to bladder management.
  • There is weak level 2 evidence based on a single low quality RCT that suggests that use of the Statlock device to secure indwelling and suprapubic catheters may lead to a lower rate of UTI.
  • There is level 2 evidence based on a single prospective controlled trial that suggests that removal of external condom drainage collection systems at night or for 24 hours/day might reduce perineal, urethral or rectal bacterial levels  but have no effect on bacteriuria.
  • There is level 4 evidence based on a single case series that no bladder management method is advantageous in preventing pyelonephritis (though indwelling urethral catheterization does have the highest incidence of upper tract deterioration). However, the presence of reflux results in a 2.8 fold higher incidence of pyelonephritis.
  • There is level 1 evidence based on a single RCT and supported by two level 4 investigations that bacterial interference in the form of E. coli 83972 bladder inoculation may prevent UTIs.
  • There is level 1 evidence from a single RCT that low-dose, long-term ciprofloxacin may prevent symptomatic UTI.
  • There is level 1 evidence from a single RCT that TMP-SMX as prophylaxis may reduce symptomatic UTI rates although conflicting findings were obtained from 2 prospective controlled trials. The potential for emergence of drug resistant bacteria and TMP-SMX related adverse events further limit the potential use of TMP-SMX for prophylaxis.
  • There is level 4 evidence from a single study that suggests weekly oral cyclic antibiotic use, customized as to individual allergy and antimicrobial susceptibility, may be effective for UTI prevention in SCI patients. 
  • There is level 1 evidence based on a single RCT that oral methenamine hippurate, either alone or in combination with cranberry, is not effective for UTI prevention.
  • There is level 2 evidence from separate studies that bladder irrigation with trisdine, kanamycin-colistin or a 5% hemiacidrin solution combined with oral methenamine mandelate (2 mg qid) may be effective for UTI prevention.
  • There are varying levels of evidence that bladder irrigation with neomycin/polymyxin (level 1), acetic acid (level 1), ascorbic acid (level 2) or phosphate supplementation (level 4) is not effective for UTI prevention.
  • There is level 2 evidence based on a single low quality RCT that supports the use of daily body washing with chlorohexidine and application of chlorhexidine cream to the penis after every catheterization versus using standard soap to reduce bacteriuria and perineal colonization.
  • There is conflicting level 1 evidence across 4 RCTs (1 +ive, 3 –ive) to support the effectiveness of cranberry in preventing UTI in patients with neurogenic bladder due to SCI.
  • There is level 1 evidence from a single RCT that a single educational session conducted by SCI specialist health professionals with accompanying written materials and a single follow-up telephone call can result in reduced urine bacterial colony counts in community-dwelling individuals with prior history of SCI.
  • The beneficial effects of education mediated by SCI specialist health professionals on reducing UTI risk in community-dwelling individuals with SCI are supported by a single level 2 study and two level 4 studies incorporating different features such as one-on one or group workshops, demonstrations, practice of techniques and written materials.
  • There is no evidence assessing the relative effectiveness of different educational approaches for reducing UTI risk. 
  • There is level 1 evidence from a single RCT that supports the use of 14 vs 3 days of Ciprofloxcin for improved clinical and microbiological outcomes in the treatment of UTI in persons with SCI. 
  • There is level 1 evidence from a single RCT suggesting that 3 or 7 day Ofloxacin treatment is more effective than trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in treating UTI and results in significant bladder bacterial biofilm eradication in persons with SCI patients. 
  • Level 4 evidence from a single study suggests that norfloxacin may be a reasonable treatment choice for UTI in SCI but subsequent resistance must be monitored.
  • A low success rate of aminoglycosides in the treatment of SCI UTI is supported by level 1 evidence from a single RCT.
  • Optimum antimicrobial treatment duration and dosage is uncertain due to the lack of comparative trials in persons with SCI.
  • Level 4 evidence is reported for intermittent neomycin/polymyxin bladder irrigation being effective in altering the resistance of the offending bladder organism(s) to allow for appropriate antibiotic treatment.

Key Points

DESD Therapy in SCI: Enhancing Bladder Volumes Pharmacologically

Anticholinergic Therapy for SCI-Related Detrusor Overactivity

Propiverine, oxybutynin, tolterodine and trospium chloride are efficacious anticholinergic agents for the treatment of SCI neurogenic bladder.

  • Treatment with 2 of oxybutynin, tolterodine or trospium may be effective for the treatment of SCI neurogenic bladder in those not previously responding to one of these medications.
  • Oxybutynin co-treatment with verapamil may enhance the standard formulation of oxybutynin in the treatment of SCI detrusor hyperreflexia.
  • Oral Tolterodine, propiverine or transdermal application of oxybutinin likely results in less dry mouth but are similar in efficacy to oral oxybutynin in terms of improving neurogenic detrusor overactivity.

Toxin Therapy for SCI-Related Detrusor Overactivity

  • Overall botulinum toxin for neurogenic detrusor overactivity in SCI is effective in reducing incontinence and excessive bladder pressure while improving bladder capacity for those resistant to, or intolerant of, oral anticholinergics.
  • Capsaicin seems to have some clinical benefits but the side effects of pain and AD are concerning for clinical use. Resiniferotoxin seems to be tolerated much better and has similar improvements therapeutically. Pharmaceutical formulation difficulties make it non-existent for clinical use at present.

Intravesical Instillations for SCI-Related Detrusor Overactivity

  • Intravesical instillations with oxybutinun or propantheline are ineffective for treating neurogenic bladder in people with SCI.

Other Pharmaceutical Treatments for SCI-Related Detrusor Overactivity

  • Intrathecal baclofen and clonidine may be beneficial for bladder function improvement but further confirmatory evidence is needed.

DESD Therapy in SCI: Enhancing Bladder Volumes Non-Pharmacologically

Surgical Augmentation of the Bladder to Enhance Volume

  • Surgical augmentation of bladder may result in enhanced bladder capacity under lower filling pressure and improved continence in persons with SCI.
  • Extraperitoneal vs intraperitoneal augmentation enterocystoplasty may result in better postoperative recovery.

DESD Therapy in SCI: Enhancing Bladder Emptying Pharmacologically

Alpha-adrenergic Blockers for Bladder Emptying

  • Tamsulosin is likely to improve urine flow in SCI individuals with bladder neck dysfunction.
  • Mosixylyte is likely able to decrease maximum urethral closure pressure at a dose of 0.75mg/kg in individuals with SCI.
  • Terazosin may be an alternative treatment for bladder neck dysfunction in individuals with SCI. but side effects and drug tolerance should be monitored.
  • Phenoxybenzamine may be useful as an adjunct therapy for reducing residual urine volume in SCI neuropathic bladders maintained by crede or tapping.
  • Six months of alpha 1-blocker therapy in male SCI patients may improve upper tract stasis.

Botulinum Toxin for Bladder Emptying

  • Botulinum toxin injected into the sphincter is effective in assisting with bladder emptying for persons with neurogenic bladder due to SCI.

DESD Therapy in SCI: Enhancing Bladder Emptying Non-Pharmacologically

Comparing Methods of Conservative Bladder Emptying

  • Intermittent catheterization, whether performed acutely or chronically, has the lowest complication rate.
  • Indwelling catheterization, whether suprapubic or urethral or whether conducted acutely or chronically, may result in a higher long-term rate of urological and renal complications than other management methods.
  • Persons with tetraplegia and complete injuries and to a lesser degree females may have difficulty in maintaining compliance with intermittent catheterization procedures following discharge from rehabilitation.

Intermittent Catheterization

  • Although both pre-lubricated and hydrophilic catheters have been associated with reduced incidence of UTIs as compared to conventional Poly Vinyl Chloride catheters, less urethral microtrauma with their use may only be seen with pre-lubricated catheters.
  • Urethral complications and epididymoorchitis occurs more frequently in those using IC programs.
  • Portable ultrasound device can improve the scheduling of intermittent catheterizations.

Triggering-Type or Expression Voiding Methods of Bladder Management

  • Valsalva or Crede maneuver may assist some individuals to void spontaneously but produce high intra-vesical pressure, increasing the risk for long-term complications.

Indwelling Catheterization (Indwelling or Suprapubic)

  • With diligent care and ongoing medical follow-up, indwelling suprapubic catheterization may be an effective and satisfactory bladder management choice for some people, though there is insufficient evidence to report lifelong safety of such a regime.
  • Indwelling catheter users are at higher risk of bladder cancer, especially in the second decade of use, though risk also increases during the first decade of use.

Condom Catheterization

  • Patients using condom drainage should be monitored for complete emptying and for low pressure drainage, to reduce UTI and upper tract deterioration. Sphincterotomy may eventually be required. 
  • Penile implants may allow easier use of condom catheters and reduce incontinence.

Continent Catheterizable Stoma and Incontinent Urinary Diversion

  • Catheterizable abdominal stomas may increase the likelihood of achieving continence and independence in self-catherization, and may result in a bladder management program that offers more optimal upper tract protection.
  • Cutaneous ileal conduit diversion may increase the likelihood of achieving continence but may also be associated with a high incidence of various long-term complications.

Electrical Stimulation for Bladder Emptying (and Enhancing Volumes)

  • Sacral anterior root stimulation (accompanied in most cases by posterior sacral rhizotomy) enhances bladder function and is an effective bladder management technique, though the program (surgery and followup) requires significant expertise.
  • Direct bladder stimulation may be effective in reducing incontinence and increasing bladder capacity but requires further study.
  • Posterior sacral, pudenal, dorsal penile or clitoral nerve stimulation may be effective to increase bladder capacity but requires further study.
  • Early sacral neural modulation may improve management of lower urinary tract dysfunction but requires further study.

Sphincterotomy, Artificial Sphincters, Stents and Related Approaches for Bladder Emptying

  • Surgical and prosthetic approaches (with a sphincterotomy and stent respectively) to allow bladder emptying through a previously dysfunctional external sphincter both seem equally effective resulting in enhanced drainage although both may result in long-term upper and lower urinary tract complications.
  • Artificial urinary sphincter implantation and transurethral balloon dilation of the external sphincter may be associated with improved bladder outcomes but require further study.

DESD Therapy in SCI: Other Miscellaneous Treatments

  • Early electroacupuncture therapy as adjunctive therapy may result in decreased time to achieve desired outcomes.
  • Intranasal DDVAP may reduce nocturnal urine emissions and decrease the frequency of voids (or catheterizations).
  • Anastomosis of the T11, L5 or S1 roots to the S2-S3 spinal nerve roots may result in improved bladder function in chronic SCI.

Urinary Tract Infections: Detecting and Investigating UTIs

  • Both limited and full microbial investigation may result in adequate clinical response to UTI treatment with antibiotics.
  • Indwelling or suprapubic catheters should be changed just prior to urine collection so as to limit the amount of false positive urine tests.
  • Urinalysis and urine culture results of SCI patients are not likely to be affected by sample refrigeration (up to 24 hours).
  • It is uncertain if dipstick testing for nitrates or leukocyte esterase is useful in screening for bacteriuria to assist treatment decision-making.

Urinary Tract Infections: Non-Pharmacological Methods of Preventing UTIs

Intermittent Catheterization and Prevention of UTIs

  • Sterile and clean approaches to intermittent catheterization seem equally effective in minimizing UTIs in inpatient rehabilitation.
  • Similar rates of UTI may be seen with intermittent catheterization as conducted by the patients themselves or by a specialized team during inpatient rehabilitation.
  • Similar rates of UTI may be seen with intermittent catheterization, whether conducted in the short-term during inpatient rehabilitation or in the long-term while living in the community.
  • UTIs were not associated with differences in residual urine volumes after intermittent catheterization.

Intermittent Catheterization using Specially Coated Catheters for Preventing UTIs

  • A reduced incidence of UTIs or reduced antibiotic treatment of symptomatic UTIs have been associated with pre-lubricated or hydrophilic catheters as compared to standard non-hydrophilic catheters.

Other Issues Associated with Bladder Management and UTI Prevention

  • Intermittent catheterization is associated with a lower rate of UTI as compared to use of indwelling or suprapubic catheter.
  • The Statlock device to secure indwelling and suprapubic catheters may lead to a lower rate of UTI.
  • Removal of external condom drainage collection systems at night or for 24 hours/day may reduce perineal, urethral or rectal bacterial levels but have no effect on bacteriuria.
  • The presence of vesicoureteral reflux likely has a greater impact on development of significant infections than the choice of bladder management.

Urinary Tract Infections: Pharmacological and Other Biological Methods of UTI Prevention

Bacterial Interference for Prevention of UTIs

  • E. coli 83972 bladder inoculation may prevent UTIs.

Antibiotic Prophylaxis of UTIs

  • Ciprofloxacin may be indicated for UTI prophylaxis in SCI but further research is needed to support its use.
  • Long-term use of TMP-SMX is not recommended for sustained use as a suppressive therapy for UTI prevention.
  • A weekly oral cyclic antibiotic, customized to the individual, may be beneficial in preventing UTI in SCI.

Antiseptic and Related Approaches for Preventing UTIs

  • Oral methenamine hippurate, either alone or in combination with cranberry, is not effective for UTI prevention.
  • The antiseptic agents delivered via bladder irrigation (5% hemiacidrin solution combined with oral methenamine mandelate) may be effective for UTI prevention, whereas others are not (i.e., trisdine, kanamycin-colistin, neomycin/polymyxin, acetic acid, ascorbic acid and phosphate supplementation).
  • Daily body washing with chlorohexidine and application of chlorhexidine cream to the penis after every catheterization instead of using standard soap may reduce bacteriuria and perineal colonization.

Cranberry for Preventing UTIs

  • It is uncertain if cranberry is effective in preventing UTIs in persons with SCI.

Urinary Tract Infections: Educational Interventions for Maintaining a Healthy Bladder and Preventing UTIs

  • A variety of bladder management education programs are effective in reducing UTI risk in community-dwelling persons with SCI, although limited information exists as to the most effective approaches.

Urinary Tract Infections: Pharmacological Treatments of UTIs

Antibiotics in Treatment of UTIs

  • Ciprofloxin administered over 14 (vs 3) days may result in improved clinical and microbiological SCI UTI treatment outcome.
  • Ofloxacin administered over either a 3 or 7 day treatment regimen may result in significant SCI UTI cure and bladder bacterial biofilm eradication rate, moreso than trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.
  • Norfloxacin may be a reasonable treatment choice for UTI in SCI but subsequent resistance must be monitored.
  • Aminoglycosides have a low success rate in the treatment of SCI UTI.
  • Intermittent neomycin/polymyxin bladder irrigation may be effective in altering the resistance of the offending bladder organism(s) to allow for appropriate antibiotic treatment.

References

  • Abdill CK, Rivas DR, Chancellor MB. Transurethral placement of external sphincter wire mesh stent for neurogenic bladder. SCI Nurs 1994;11(2):38-41.
  • Abrams P, Amarenco G, Bakke A, Buczynski A, Castro-Diaz D, Harrison S et al. Tamsulosin: efficacy and safety in patients with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction due to suprasacral spinal cord injury. J Urol 2003;170(4 Pt 1):1242-1251.
  • Akbar M, Abel R, Seyler TM, Bedke J, Haferkamp A, Gerner HJ et al. Repeated botulinum-A toxin injections in the treatment of myelodysplastic children and patients with spinal cord injuries with neurogenic bladder dysfunction. BJU Int 2007;100(3):639-645.
  • Al-Ali M, Salman G, Rasheed A, Al-Ani G, Al-Rubaiy S, Alwan A et al. Phenoxybenzamine in the management of neuropathic bladder following spinal cord injury. Aust N Z J Surg 1999;69(9):660-663.
  • Adler US, Kirshblum SC. A new assistive device for intermittent self-catheterization in men with tetraplegia. Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine 2003;26:155-8.
  • Amend B, Hennenlotter J, Schafer T. Horstmann M. Stenzyl A. Sievert K.D. Effective treatment of neurogenic detrusor dysfunction by combined high-dosed antimuscarinics without increased side-effects. European Urology 2008; 53:1021-1028.
  • Anderson TP, Newman E, Dryja R, Price M. Urinary tract care: improvement through patient education. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1983;64(7):314-316.
  • Barber DB, Woodard FL, Rogers SJ, Able AC. The efficacy of nursing education as an intervention in the treatment of recurrent urinary tract infections in individuals with spinal cord injury. SCI Nurs 1999;16(2):54-56.
  • Biering-Sorensen F, Hoiby N, Nordenbo A, Ravnborg M, Bruun B, Rahm V. Ciprofloxacin as prophylaxis for urinary tract infection: prospective, randomized, cross-over, placebo controlled study in patients with spinal cord lesion. J Urol 1994;151(1):105-108.
  • Biering-Sorensen F, Bagi P, Hoiby N. Urinary tract infections in patients with spinal cord lesions: treatment and prevention. Drugs 2001;61(9):1275-1287.
  • Biering-Sorensen F. Urinary tract infection in individuals with spinal cord lesion. Curr Opin Urol 2002;12(1):45-49.
  • Brindley GS, Polkey CE, Rushton DN. Sacral anterior root stimulators for bladder control in paraplegia. Paraplegia 1982;20(6):365-381.
  • Bycroft JA, Craggs MD, Sheriff M, Knight S, Shah PJ. Does magnetic stimulation of sacral nerve roots cause contraction or suppression of the bladder? Neurourol Urodyn 2004;23(3):241-245.
  • Cardenas DD, Hoffman JM, Kelly E, Mayo ME. Impact of a urinary tract infection educational program in persons with spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med 2004;27(1):47-54.
  • Cardenas DD, Hoffman JM. Hydrophilic catheters versus noncoated catheters for reducing the incidence of urinary tract infections: A randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009; 90:1668-1671.Carlsson CA, Sundin T. Reconstruction of efferent pathways to the urinary bladder in a paraplegic child. Rev Surg 1967;24(1):73-76.
  • Castello T, Girona L, Gomez MR, Mena MA, Garcia L. The possible value of ascorbic acid as a prophylactic agent for urinary tract infection. Spinal Cord 1996;34(10):592-593.
  • Chancellor MB, Karasick S, Strup S, Abdill CK, Hirsch IH, Staas WE. Transurethral balloon dilation of the external urinary sphincter: Effectiveness in spinal cord-injured men with detrusor-external urethral sphincter dyssynergia. Radiology 1993;187(2):557-560.
  • Chancellor MB, Erhard MJ, Rivas DA. Clinical effect of alpha-1 antagonism by terazosin on external and internal urinary sphincter function. J Am Paraplegia Soc 1993;16(4):207-214.
  • Chancellor MB, Rivas DA, Staas WE, Jr. DDAVP in the urological management of the difficult neurogenic bladder in spinal cord injury: preliminary report. J Am Paraplegia Soc 1994;17(4):165-167.
  • Chancellor MB, Rivas DA, Abdill CK, Staas WE, Jr., Bennett CJ, Finocchiaro MV et al. Management of sphincter dyssynergia using the sphincter stent prosthesis in chronically catheterized SCI men. J Spinal Cord Med 1995;18(2):88-94.
  • Chancellor MB, Bennett C, Simoneau AR, Finocchiaro MV, Kline C, Bennett JK et al. Sphincteric stent versus external sphincterotomy in spinal cord injured men: prospective randomized multicenter trial. J Urol 1999;161(6):1893-1898.
  • Charbonneau-Smith R. No-touch catheterization and infection rates in a select spinal cord injured population. Rehabil Nurs 1993;18(5):296-9, 305.
  • Charlifue SW, Weitzenkamp DA, Whiteneck GG. Longitudinal outcomes in spinal cord injury: aging, secondary conditions, and well-being. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80(11):1429-1434.
  • Chartier-Kastler E, Azouvi P, Yakovleff A, Bussel B, Richard F, Denys P. Intrathecal catheter with subcutaneous port for clonidine test bolus injection. A new route and type of treatment for detrusor hyperreflexia in spinal cord-injured patients. Eur Urol 2000;37(1):14-17.
  • Chartier-Kastler EJ, Mongiat-Artus P, Bitker MO, Chancellor MB, Richard F, Denys P. Long-term results of augmentation cystoplasty in spinal cord injury patients. Spinal Cord 2000;38(8):490-494.
  • Chartier-Kastler EJ, Mozer P, Denys P, Bitker MO, Haertig A, Richard F. Neurogenic bladder management and cutaneous non-continent ileal conduit. Spinal Cord 2002;40(9):443-448.
  • Cheng P-T, Wong M-K, Chang P-L. A therapeutic trial of acupuncture in neurogenic bladder of spinal cord injured patients - A preliminary report. Spinal Cord 1998;36(7):476-480.
  • Cook JB, Smith PH. Percutaneous suprapubic cystostomy after spinal cord injury. Br J Urol 1976;48(2):119-121.
  • Costa P, Bressolle F, Sarrazin B, Mosser J, Sabatier R. Dose-related effect of moxisylyte on maximal urethral closing pressure in patients with spinal cord injuries. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics 1993;53(4):443-449.
  • Craven ML, Etchells J. A review of the outcome of stoma surgery on spinal cord injured patients. J Adv Nurs 1998; 27(5):922-926.
  • Creasey GH, Grill JH, Korsten M, HS U, Betz R, Anderson R et al. An implantable neuroprosthesis for restoring bladder and bowel control to patients with spinal cord injuries: a multicenter trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82(11):1512-1519.
  • Darouiche RO, Smith MS, Markowski J. Antibiotic prophylaxis for urodynamic testing in patients with spinal cord injury: a preliminary study. J Hosp Infect 1994;28(1):57-61.
  • Darouiche RO, Priebe M, Clarridge JE. Limited vs full microbiological investigation for the management of symptomatic polymicrobial urinary tract infection in adult spinal cord-injured patients. Spinal Cord 1997;35(8):534-539.
  • Darouiche RO, Thornby JI, Cerra-Stewart C, Donovan WH, Hull RA. Bacterial interference for prevention of urinary tract infection: a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind pilot trial. Clin Infect Dis 2005;41(10):1531-1534.
  • Darouiche RO, Goetz L, Kaldis T, Cerra-Stewart C, AlSharif A, Priebe M. Impact of StatLock securing device on symptomatic catheter-related urinary tract infection: a prospective, randomized, multicenter clinical trial. Am J Infect Control 2006;34(9):555-560.
  • Das A, Chancellor MB, Watanabe T, Sedor J, Rivas DA. Intravesical capsaicin in neurologic impaired patients with detrusor hyperreflexia. J Spinal Cord Med 1996;19(3):190-193.
  • Dasgupta P, Chandiramani V, Parkinson MC, Beckett A, Fowler CJ. Treating the human bladder with capsaicin: is it safe? Eur Urol 1998;33(1):28-31.
  • De Groat WC. Mechanisms underlying the recovery of lower urinary tract function following spinal cord injury. Paraplegia 1995; 33(9):493-505
  • De Ridder DJ, Everaert K, Fernandez LG, Valero JV, Duran AB, Abrisqueta ML et al. Intermittent catheterisation with hydrophilic-coated catheters (SpeediCath) reduces the risk of clinical urinary tract infection in spinal cord injured patients: a prospective randomised parallel comparative trial. Eur Urol 2005;48(6):991-995.
  • deSeze M, Wiart L, Joseph PA, Dosque JP, Mazaux JM, Barat M. Capsaicin and neurogenic detrusor hyperreflexia: a double-blind placebo-controlled study in 20 patients with spinal cord lesions. Neurourol Urodyn 1998;17(5):513-523.
  • deSeze M, Petit H, Gallien P, de Seze MP, Joseph PA, Mazaux JM et al. Botulinum a toxin and detrusor sphincter dyssynergia: a double-blind lidocaine-controlled study in 13 patients with spinal cord disease. Eur Urol 2002;42(1):56-62.
  • deSeze M, Wiart L, de Seze MP, Soyeur L, Dosque JP, Blajezewski S et al. Intravesical capsaicin versus resiniferatoxin for the treatment of detrusor hyperreflexia in spinal cord injured patients: a double-blind, randomized, controlled study. J Urol 2004;171(1):251-255.
  • Dow G, Rao P, Harding G, Brunka J, Kennedy J, Alfa M et al. A prospective, randomized trial of 3 or 14 days of ciprofloxacin treatment for acute urinary tract infection in patients with spinal cord injury. Clin Infect Dis 2004;39(5):658-664.
  • Drake MJ, Cortina-Borja M, Savic G, Charlifue SW, Gardner BP. Prospective evaluation of urological effects of aging in chronic spinal cord injury by method of bladder management. Neurourol Urodyn 2005;24(2):111-116.
  • Dray A. Neuropharmacological mechanisms of capsaicin and related substances. Biochem Pharmacol 1992;44(4):611-615.
  • Dykstra DD, Sidi AA, Scott AB, Pagel JM, Goldish GD. Effects of botulinum A toxin on detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia in spinal cord injury patients. J Urol 1988;139(5):919-922.
  • Dykstra DD, Sidi AA. Treatment of detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia with botulinum A toxin: a double-blind study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1990;71(1):24-26.
  • Egon G, Barat M, Colombel P, Visentin C, Isambert JL, Guerin J. Implantation of anterior sacral root stimulators combined with posterior sacral rhizotomy in spinal injury patients. World J Urol 1998;16(5):342-349.
  • Ehren I, Volz D, Farrelly E, Berglund L, Brundin L, Hultling C et al. Efficacy and impact of botulinum toxin A on quality of life in patients with neurogenic detrusor overactivity: a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind study. Scand J Urol Nephrol 2007;41(4):335-340.
  • Ethans KD, Nance PW, Bard RJ, Casey AR, Schryvers OI. Efficacy and safety of tolterodine in people with neurogenic detrusor overactivity. J Spinal Cord Med 2004;27(3):214-218.
  • Evans RJ. Intravesical therapy for overactive bladder. Current Urology Reports 2005; 6:429-433.
  • Faarvang KL, Muller P, Lomberg B, Biering-Sorensen F. Screening for bacteriuria in patients with spinal cord lesion: dipstick test, microscopic examination and urine culture. Spinal Cord 2000;38(2):106-108.
  • Gallien P, Nicolas B, Robineau S, Le Bot MP, Durufle A, Brissot R. Influence of urinary management on urologic complications in a cohort of spinal cord injury patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998;79(10):1206-1209.
  • Game, X., Chartier-Kastler, E., Ayoub, N., Even-Schneider, A., Richard, F., Denys, P. Outcome after treatment of detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia by temporary stent. Spinal Cord 2008;46: 74-77.
  • Garcia Leoni ME, Esclarin De RA. Management of urinary tract infection in patients with spinal cord injuries. Clin Microbiol Infect 2003;9(8):780-785.
  • George J, Tharion G, Richar J, Macaden AS, Thomas R, Bhattacharji S. The effectiveness of intravesical oxybutynin, propantheline, and capsaicin in the management of neuropathic bladder following spinal cord injury. Scientific World Journal 2007;7:1683-1690.
  • Giannantoni A, Scivoletto G, Di Stasi SM, Silecchia A, Finazzi-Agro E, Micali I et al. Clean intermittent catheterization and prevention of renal disease in spinal cord injury patients. Spinal Cord 1998;36(1):29-32.
  • Giannantoni A, Di Stasi SM, Scivoletto G, Virgili G, Dolci S, Porena M. Intermittent catheterization with a prelubricated catheter in spinal cord injured patients: a prospective randomized crossover study. J Urol 2001;166(1):130-133.
  • Giannantoni A, Meatini E, Del Zingaro M, Porena M. Six-year follow-up of Botulinum Toxin A intradetrosrial injections in patients with refractory neurogenic detrusor oceractivity: Clinical and urodynamic results. European Urology 2009; 55:705-712.
  • Gilmore DS, Schick DG, Young MN, Montgomerie JZ. Effect of external urinary collection system on colonization and urinary tract infections with Pseudomonas and Klebsiella in men with spinal cord injury. J Am Paraplegia Soc 1992;15(3):155-157.
  • Green BG. Changes in bladder management of spinal cord-injured patients through the years: have we succeeded in keeping our patients catheter-free. Top Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation 2004;10(2):79-85.
  • Greenstein A, Rucker KS, Katz PG. Voiding by increased abdominal pressure in male spinal cord injury patients--long term follow up. Paraplegia 1992;30(4):253-255.
  • Gribble MJ, Puterman ML. Prophylaxis of urinary tract infection in persons with recent spinal cord injury: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Am J Med 1993;95(2):141-152.
  • Groah SL, Weitzenkamp DA, Lammertse DP, Whiteneck GG, Lezotte DC, Hamman RF. Excess risk of bladder cancer in spinal cord injury: evidence for an association between indwelling catheter use and bladder cancer. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83(3):346-351.
  • Grosse, J., Kramer, G., Jakse, G. Comparing two types of botulinum-A toxin detrusor injections in patients with severe neurogenic detrusor overactivity: a case-control study. BJU International 2009;104: 651-656.
  • Hackler RH. Long-term Suprapubic cystostomy drainage in spinal cord injury patients. Br J Urol 1982;54(2):120-121.
  • Hagglund KJ, Clark MJ, Schopp LH et al. Consumer-assistant education can reduce the occurrence of urinary tract infections among persons with spinal cord injury. Top in Spinal Cord Rehabil 2005;10(5):53-62.
  • Hajebrahimi, S., Altaweel, W., Cadoret, J., Cohen, E., Corcos, J. Efficacy of botulinum-A toxin in adults with neurogenic overactive bladder: initial results. Canadian Journal of Urology 2005; 12: 2543-2546.
  • Hakenberg OW, Ebermayer J, Manseck A, Wirth MP. Application of the Mitrofanoff principle for intermittent self-catheterization in quadriplegic patients. Urology 2001;58(1):38-42.
  • Hanno PM, Sant GR. Clinical highlights of the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases/Interstitial Cystitis Association scientific conference on interstitial cystitis. Urology 2001;57(6 Suppl 1):2-6.
  • Hansen RB, Biering-Sorensen F, Kristensen JK. Urinary calculi following traumatic spinal cord injury. Scandinavian Journal of Urology & Nephrology 2007;41:115-9.
  • Hansen J, Media S, Nohr M, Biering-Sorensen F, Sinkjaer T, Rijkhoff NJ. Treatment of neurogenic detrusor overactivity in spinal cord injured patients by conditional electrical stimulation. J Urol 2005;173(6):2035-2039.
  • Hassouna M, Elmayergi N, Abdelhady M. Update on sacral neuromodulation: indications and outcomes. Curr Urol Rep 2003 Oct;4(5):391-398.
  • Hess, M. J., Hess, P. E., Sullivan, M. R., Nee, M., Yalla, S. V. Evaluation of cranberry tablets for the prevention of urinary tract infections in spinal cord injured patients with neurogenic bladder. Spinal Cord 2008; 46: 622-626.
  • Hoffman JM, Wadhwani R, Kelly E, Dixit B, Cardenas DD. Nitrite and leukocyte dipstick testing for urinary tract infection in individuals with spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med 2004;27(2):128-132.
  • Hori, S., Patki, P., Attar, K. H., Ismail, S., Vasconcelos, J. C., Shah, P. J. Patients' perspective of botulinum toxin-A as a long-term treatment option for neurogenic detrusor overactivity secondary to spinal cord injury. BJU International 2009;104,:216-220.
  • Horstmann M, Schaefer T, Aguilar Y, Stenzl A, Sievert KD. Neurogenic bladder treatment by doubling the recommended antimuscarinic dosage. Neurourol Urodyn 2006;25(5):441-445.
  • Horton JA, III, Kirshblum SC, Linsenmeyer TA, Johnston M, Rustagi A. Does refrigeration of urine alter culture results in hospitalized patients with neurogenic bladders? J Spinal Cord Med 1998;21(4):342-347.
  • Hull R, Rudy D, Donovan W, Svanborg C, Wieser I, Stewart C et al. Urinary tract infection prophylaxis using Escherichia coli 83972 in spinal cord injured patients. J Urol 2000;163(3):872-877.
  • Jensen AE, Hjeltnes N, Berstad J, Stanghelle JK. Residual urine following intermittent catheterisation in patients with spinal cord injuries. Paraplegia 1995;33(12):693-696.
  • Jepson RG, Craig JC. Cranberries for preventing urinary tract infections. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008;(1):CD001321.
  • Joshi A, Darouiche RO. Regression of pyuria during the treatment of symptomatic urinary tract infection in patients with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 1996;34(12):742-744.
  • Juma S, Mostafavi M, Joseph A. Sphincterotomy: long-term complications and warning signs. Neurourol Urodyn 1995;14(1):33-41.
  • Karsenty G, Chartier-Kastler E, Mozer P, Even-Schneider A, Denys P, Richard F. A novel technique to achieve cutaneous continent urinary diversion in spinal cord-injured patients unable to catheterize through native urethra. Spinal Cord 2008;46(4):305-310.
  • Kato H, Hosaka K, Kobayashi S, Igawa Y, Nishizawa O. Fate of tetraplegic patients managed by ileal conduit for urinary control: long-term follow-up. Int J Urol 2002;9(5):253-256.
  • Katz PG, Greenstein A, Severs SL, Zampieri TA, Singh SK. Effect of implanted epidural stimulator on lower urinary tract function in spinal-cord-injured patients. Eur Urol 1991;20(2):103-106.
  • Kaufman JM, Fam B, Jacobs SC, Gabilondo F, Yalla S, Kane JP et al. Bladder cancer and squamous metaplasia in spinal cord injury patients. J Urol 1977;118(6):967-971.
  • Kennelly MJ, Lemack GE, Foote JE, Trop CS. Efficacy and safety of Oxybutynin Transdermal System in spinal cord injury patients with neurogenic detrusor overactivity and incontinence: An open-label, dose-titration study. Urology 2009; 74:741–745.
  • Khastgir J, Hamid R, Arya M, Shah N, Shah PJ. Surgical and patient reported outcomes of 'clam' augmentation ileocystoplasty in spinal cord injured patients. Eur Urol 2003;43(3):263-269.
  • Kim JH, Rivas DA, Shenot PJ, Green B, Kennelly M, Erickson JR et al. Intravesical resiniferatoxin for refractory detrusor hyperreflexia: a multicenter, blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J Spinal Cord Med 2003;26(4):358-363.
  • Kirkham AP, Knight SL, Craggs MD, Casey AT, Shah PJ. Neuromodulation through sacral nerve roots 2 to 4 with a Finetech-Brindley sacral posterior and anterior root stimulator. Spinal Cord 2002;40(6):272-281.
  • Kirkham APS, Shah NC, Knight SL, Shah PJR, Craggs MD. The acute effects of continuous and conditional neuromodulation on the bladder in spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2001;39(8):420-428.
  • Klaphajone, J., Kitisomprayoonkul, W., Sriplakit, S. Botulinum toxin type A injections for treating neurogenic detrusor overactivity combined with low-compliance bladder in patients with spinal cord lesions.  Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 2005; 86: 2114-2118.
  • Kovindha A, Mai WN, Madersbacher H. Reused silicone catheter for clean intermittent catheterization (CIC): is it safe for spinal cord-injured (SCI) men? Spinal Cord 2004;42(11):638-642.
  • Krebs M, Halvorsen RB, Fishman IJ, Santos-Mendoza N. Prevention of urinary tract infection during intermittent catheterization. Journal d'urologie 1984;131(1):82-85.
  • Ku JH, Choi WJ, Lee KY et al. Complications of the upper urinary tract in patients with spinal cord injury: a long-term follow-up study. Urological Research 2005;33:435-9.
  • Ku JH, Jung TY, Lee JK, Park WH, Shim HB. Risk factors for urinary stone formation in men with spinal cord injury: a 17-year follow-up study. BJU Int 2006;97(4):790-793.
  • Kuo, H. C. Therapeutic effects of suburothelial injection of botulinum a toxin for neurogenic detrusor overactivity due to chronic cerebrovascular accident and spinal cord lesions. Urology 2006; 67: 232-236.
  • Kuo, H. C. Satisfaction with urethral injection of botulinum toxin A for detrusor sphincter dyssynergia in patients with spinal cord lesion. Neurourology & Urodynamics 2008; 27,:793-796.
  • Kutzenberger J, Domurath B, Sauerwein D. Spastic bladder and spinal cord injury: seventeen years of experience with sacral deafferentation and implantation of an anterior root stimulator. Artif Organs 2005;29(3):239-241.
  • Kutzenberger J. Surgical therapy of neurogenic detrusor overactivity (hyperreflexia) in paraplegic patients by sacral deafferentation and implant driven micturition by sacral anterior root stimulation: methods, indications, results, complications, and future prospects. Acta Neurochir Suppl 2007; 97(1):333-339.
  • Lazzeri M, Calo G, Spinelli M, Guerrini R, Salvadori S, Beneforti P et al. Urodynamic effects of intravesical nociceptin/orphanin FQ in neurogenic detrusor overactivity: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study. Urology 2003;61(5):946-950.
  • Lazzeri M,Calò G, Spinelli M, Malaguti S, Guerrini R, Salvadori S, Beneforti P, Regoli D, Turini D. Daily intravesical instillation of 1 mg Nociceptin/Orphanin FQ for the control of neurogenic detrusor overactivity: A multicenter, placebo controlled, randomized exploratory study. J. Urol. 2006; 176:2098-2102.Lecci A, Giuliani S, Meini S, Maggi CA. Nociceptin and the micturition reflex. Peptides 2000;21(7):1007-1021.
  • Lecci A, Giuliani S, Meini S, Maggi CA. Nociceptin and the micturition reflex. [Review] [92 refs]. Peptides 2000;21:1007-21.
  • Lee BB, Haran MJ, Hunt LM, Simpson JM, Marial O, Rutkowski SB et al. Spinal-injured neuropathic bladder antisepsis (SINBA) trial. Spinal Cord 2007;45(8):542-550.
  • Lin, H., Hou, C. L., Zhong, G., Xie, Q., & Wang, S. Reconstruction of reflex pathways to the atonic bladder after conus medullaris injury: preliminary clinical results. Microsurgery 2008;28: 429-435.
  • Lin, H., Hou, C., Zhen, X., & Xu, Z. Clinical study of reconstructed bladder innervation below the level of spinal cord injury to produce urination by Achilles tendon-to-bladder reflex contractions. Journal of Neurosurgery Spine 2009;10:452-457.
  • Linsenmeyer TA, Jain A, Thompson BW. Effectiveness of neomycin/polymyxin bladder irrigation to treat resistant urinary pathogens in those with spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med 1999;22(4):252-257.
  • Linsenmeyer TA, Horton J, Benevento J. Impact of alpha1-blockers in men with spinal cord injury and upper tract stasis. J Spinal Cord Med 2002;25(2):124-128.
  • Linsenmeyer TA, Oakley A. Accuracy of individuals with spinal cord injury at predicting urinary tract infections based on their symptoms. J Spinal Cord Med 2003;26(4):352-357.
  • Linsenmeyer TA, Harrison B, Oakley A, Kirshblum S, Stock JA, Millis SR. Evaluation of cranberry supplement for reduction of urinary tract infections in individuals with neurogenic bladders secondary to spinal cord injury. A prospective, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, crossover study. J Spinal Cord Med 2004;27(1):29-34.
  • Livshits A, Catz A, Folman Y, Witz M, Livshits V, Baskov A et al. Reinnervation of the neurogenic bladder in the late period of the spinal cord trauma. Spinal Cord 2004;42(4):211-217.
  • Lloyd LK, Kuhlemeier KV, Fine PR, Stover SL. Initial bladder management in spinal cord injury: does it make a difference? Journal d'urologie 1986;135(3):523-527.
  • Locke JR, Hill DE, Walzer Y. Incidence of squamous cell carcinoma in patients with long-term catheter drainage. J Urol 1985;133(6):1034-1035.
  • Lombardi, G. & Del, P. G. Clinical outcome of sacral neuromodulation in incomplete spinal cord injured patients suffering from neurogenic lower urinary tract symptoms. Spinal Cord 2009; 47: 486-491.
  • MacDiarmid SA, Arnold EP, Palmer NB, Anthony A. Management of spinal cord injured patients by indwelling suprapubic catheterization. J Urol 1995;154(2 I):492-494.
  • Madersbacher H, Pauer W, Reiner E. Rehabilitation of micturition by transurethral electrostimulation of the bladder in patients with incomplete spinal cord lesions. Paraplegia 1982;20(4):191-195.
  • Mehta SS, Tophill PR. Memokath stents for the treatment of detrusor sphincter dyssynergia (DSD) in men with spinal cord injury: the Princess Royal Spinal Injuries Unit 10-year experience. Spinal Cord 2006;44(1):1-6.
  • Meunier JC, Mollereau C, Toll L et al. Isolation and structure of the endogenous agonist of opioid receptor-like ORL1 receptor. Nature 1995; 377(6549):532-535.
  • Moore KN, Burt J, Voaklander DC. Intermittent catheterization in the rehabilitation setting: a comparison of clean and sterile technique. Clin Rehabil 2006;20(6):461-468.
  • Nanninga JB, Wu Y, Hamilton B. Long-term intermittent catheterization in the spinal cord injury patient. J Urol 1982;128(4):760-763.
  • Newman E, Price M. External catheters: hazards and benefits of their use by men with spinal cord lesions. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1985;66(5):310-313.
  • Nomura S, Ishido T, Tanaka K, Komiya A. Augmentation ileocystoplasty in patients with neurogenic bladder due to spinal cord injury or spina bifida. Spinal Cord 2002;40(1):30-33.
  • Nwadiaro HC, Nnamonu MI, Ramyil VM, Igun GO. Comparative analysis of urethral catheterization versus suprapubic cystostomy in management of neurogenic bladder in spinal injured patients. Niger J Med 2007;16(4):318-321.
  • O'Leary M, Erickson JR, Smith CP, McDermott C, Horton J, Chancellor MB. Effect of controlled-release oxybutynin on neurogenic bladder function in spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med 2003;26(2):159-162.
  • Ord J, Lunn D, Reynard J. Bladder management and risk of bladder stone formation in spinal cord injured patients. Journal d'urologie 2003;170(5):1734-1737.
  • Pan, D., Troy, A., Rogerson, J., Bolton, D., Brown, D., & Lawrentschuk, N. Long-term outcomes of external sphincterotomy in a spinal injured population. Journal of Urology 2009; 181: 705-709.
  • Pannek J, Nehiba M. Morbidity of urodynamic testing in patients with spinal cord injury: is antibiotic prophylaxis necessary? Spinal Cord 2007;45(12):771-774.
  • Patki P, Hamid R, Shah PJ, Craggs M. Long-term efficacy of AMS 800 artificial urinary sphincter in male patients with urodynamic stress incontinence due to spinal cord lesion. Spinal Cord 2006;44(5):297-300.
  • Pazooki D, Edlund C, Karlsson AK, Dahlstrand C, Lindholm E, Tornqvist H et al. Continent cutaneous urinary diversion in patients with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2006;44(1):19-23.
  • Pearman JW. The value of kanamycin-colistin bladder instillations in reducing bacteriuria during intermittent catheterisation of patients with acute spinal cord injury. Br J Urol 1979;51(5):367-374.
  • Pearman JW, Bailey M, Harper WE. Comparison of the efficacy of "Trisdine" and kanamycin-colistin bladder instillations in reducing bacteriuria during intermittent catheterisation of patients with acute spinal cord trauma. Br J Urol 1988;62(2):140-144.
  • Peatfield RC, Burt AA, Smith PH. Suprapubic catheterisation after spinal cord injury: a follow-up report. Paraplegia 1983;21(4):220-226.
  • Perkash I, Kabalin JN, Lennon S, Wolfe V. Use of penile prostheses to maintain external condom catheter drainage in spinal cord injury patients. Paraplegia 1992;30(5):327-332.
  • Perkash I. Efficacy and safety of terazosin to improve voiding in spinal cord injury patients. J Spinal Cord Med 1995;18(4):236-239.
  • Perrouin-Verbe B, Labat JJ, Richard I, Mauduyt de lG, I, Buzelin JM, Mathe JF. Clean intermittent catheterisation from the acute period in spinal cord injury patients. Long term evaluation of urethral and genital tolerance. Paraplegia 1995;33(11):619-624.
  • Petit H, Wiart L, Gaujard E, Le BF, Ferriere JM, Lagueny A et al. Botulinum A toxin treatment for detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia in spinal cord disease. Spinal Cord 1998;36(2):91-94.
  • Phelan MW, Franks M, Somogyi GT, Yokoyama T, Fraser MO, Lavelle JP et al. Botulinum toxin urethral sphincter injection to restore bladder emptying in men and women with voiding dysfunction. J Urol 2001;165(4):1107-1110.
  • Polliack T, Bluvshtein V, Philo O, Ronen J, Gelernter I, Luttwak ZP et al. Clinical and economic consequences of volume- or time-dependent intermittent catheterization in patients with spinal cord lesions and neuropathic bladder. Spinal Cord 2005;43(10):615-619.
  • Possover, M. The sacral LION procedure for recovery of bladder/rectum/sexual functions in paraplegic patients after explantation of a previous Finetech-Brindley controller. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 2009,16: 98-101.
  • Prasad, A., Cevallos, M. E., Riosa, S., Darouiche, R. O., & Trautner, B. W. A bacterial interference strategy for prevention of UTI in persons practicing intermittent catheterization. Spinal Cord 2009, 47, 565-569.
  • Prieto-Fingerhut T, Banovac K, Lynne CM. A study comparing sterile and nonsterile urethral catheterization in patients with spinal cord injury. Rehabil Nurs 1997;22(6):299-302.
  • Quek ML, Ginsberg DA. Long-term urodynamics followup of bladder augmentation for neurogenic bladder. J Urol 2003;169(1):195-198.
  • Radziszewski, K., Zielinski, H., Radziszewski, P., & Swiecicki, R. Transcutaneous electrical stimulation of urinary bladder in patients with spinal cord injuries. International Urology & Nephrology 2009, 41, 497-503.
  • Reid G, Sharma S, Advikolanu K, Tieszer C, Martin RA, Bruce AW. Effects of ciprofloxacin, norfloxacin, and ofloxacin on in vitro adhesion and survival of Pseudomonas aeruginosa AK1 on urinary catheters. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1994;38(7):1490-1495.
  • Reid G, Dafoe L, Delaney G, Lacerte M, Valvano M, Hayes KC. Use of adhesion counts to help predict symptomatic infection and the ability of fluoroquinolones to penetrate bacterial biofilms on the bladder cells of spinal cord injured patients. Paraplegia 1994;32(7):468-472.
  • Reid G, Potter P, Delaney G, Hsieh J, Nicosia S, Hayes K. Ofloxacin for the treatment of urinary tract infections and biofilms in spinal cord injury. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2000;13(4):305-307.
  • Reid G, Hsiehl J, Potter P, Mighton J, Lam D, Warren D et al. Cranberry juice consumption may reduce biofilms on uroepithelial cells: pilot study in spinal cord injured patients. Spinal Cord 2001;39(1):26-30.
  • Reinscheid RK, Nothacker HP, Bourson A et al. Orphanin FQ: a neuropeptide that activates an opioidlike G protein-coupled receptor. Science 1995; 270(5237):792-794.
  • Reitz A, Stohrer M, Kramer G, Del Popolo G, Chartier-Kastler E, Pannek J, Burgdorfer H, Gocking K, Madersbacher H, Schumacher S, Richter R, von Tobel J, SchurchB. European experience of 200 cases treated with Botulinum-A Toxin injections into the detrusor muscle for urinary incontinence due to neurogenic detrusor overactivity. European Urology 2004; 45: 510-515.
  • Reyblat P, Chan KG, Josephson DY, Stein JP, Freeman JP, Grossfeld GD, Esrig D, Ginsberg DA. Comparison of extraperitoneal and intraperitoneal augmentation enterocystoplasty for neurogenic bladder in spinal cord injury patients. World J Urol. 2009; 27:63-68.Robinson LQ, Grant A, Weston P, Stephenson TP, Lucas M, Thomas DG. Experience with the Brindley anterior sacral root stimulator. Br J Urol 1988;62(6):553-557.
  • Robinson LQ, Grant A, Weston P, Stephenson TP, Lucas M, Thomas DG. Experience with the Brindley anterior sacral root stimulator. British Journal of Urology 1988;62:553-7.
  • Salomon J, Denys P, Merle C, Chartier-Kastler E, Perronne C, Gaillard JL et al. Prevention of urinary tract infection in spinal cord-injured patients: safety and efficacy of a weekly oral cyclic antibiotic (WOCA) programme with a 2 year follow-up--an observational prospective study. J Antimicrob Chemother 2006;57(4):784-788.
  • Sanderson PJ, Weissler S. A comparison of the effect of chlorhexidine antisepsis, soap and antibiotics on bacteriuria, perineal colonization and environmental contamination in spinally injured patients. J Hosp Infect 1990;15(3):235-243.
  • Sanderson PJ, Weissler S. The relation of colonization of the perineum to bacteriuria and environmental contamination in spinally injured patients. J Hosp Infect 1990;15(3):229-234.
  • Sandock DS, Gothe BG, Bodner DR. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis against urinary tract infection in the chronic spinal cord injury patient. Paraplegia 1995;33(3):156-160.
  • Sapico FL, Lindquist LB, Montgomerie JZ, Jimenez EM, Morrow JW. Short-course aminoglycoside therapy in patients with spinal cord injury. Standard dose versus low dose. Urology 1980;15(5):457-460.
  • Schlager TA, Ashe K, Hendley JO. Effect of a phosphate supplement on urine pH in patients with neurogenic bladder receiving intermittent catheterization. Spinal Cord 2005;43(3):187-189.
  • Schurch B, Hauri D, Rodic B, Curt A, Meyer M, Rossier AB. Botulinum-A toxin as a treatment of detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia: a prospective study in 24 spinal cord injury patients. J Urol 1996;155(3):1023-1029.
  • Schurch B, Stohrer M, Kramer G, Schmid DM, Gaul G, Hauri D. Botulinum-A toxin for treating detrusor hyperreflexia in spinal cord injured patients: a new alternative to anticholinergic drugs? Preliminary results. J Urol 2000;164(3 Pt 1):692-697.
  • Schurch B, de SM, Denys P, Chartier-Kastler E, Haab F, Everaert K et al. Botulinum toxin type a is a safe and effective treatment for neurogenic urinary incontinence: results of a single treatment, randomized, placebo controlled 6-month study. J Urol 2005;174(1):196-200.
  • Seoane-Rodriguez S, Sanchez R-L, Montoto-Marques A, Salvador-de la BS, Ferreiro-Velasco ME, varez-Castelo L et al. Long-term follow-up study of intraurethral stents in spinal cord injured patients with detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia. Spinal Cord 2007;45(9):621-626.
  • Shah PS, Cannon JP, Sullivan CL, Nemchausky B, Pachucki CT. Controlling antimicrobial use and decreasing microbiological laboratory tests for urinary tract infections in spinal-cord-injury patients with chronic indwelling catheters. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2005;62(1):74-77.
  • Sheriff MK, Foley S, McFarlane J, Nauth-Misir R, Craggs M, Shah PJ. Long-term suprapubic catheterisation: clinical outcome and satisfaction survey. Spinal Cord 1998;36(3):171-176.
  • Shin JC, Kim YW, Park CI, Kang SW, Yang SC. Effect of the intravesical resiniferatoxin instillation evaluated by the ice provocative urodynamic study. Spinal Cord 2006;44(5):309-314.
  • Shohl AT, Janney JH. Optimal growth of E.coli in urine at varying hydrogen ion concentrations. J Urol 1917;1:211-228.
  • Sievert KD, Amend B, Gakis G, Toomey P, Badke A, Kaps HP, Stenzl A. Early sacral neuromodulation prevents urinary incontinence after complete spinal cord injury. Ann Neurol 2010; 67:74-84.Silva C, Silva J, Ribeiro MJ, Avelino A, Cruz F. Urodynamic effect of intravesical resiniferatoxin in patients with neurogenic detrusor overactivity of spinal origin: results of a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial. Eur Urol 2005;48(4):650-655.
  • Silva C, Silva J, Ribeiro MJ, Avelino A, Cruz F. Urodynamic effect of intravesical resiniferatoxin in patients with neurogenic detrusor overactivity of spinal origin: results of a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial. European Urology 2005;48:650-5.
  • Singh G, Thomas DG. Intravesical oxybutynin in patients with posterior rhizotomies and sacral anterior root stimulators. Neurourol Urodyn 1995;14(1):65-71.
  • Spinelli M, Malaguti S, Giardiello G, Lazzeri M, Tarantola J, Van Den Hombergh U. A new minimally invasive procedure for pudendal nerve stimulation to treat neurogenic bladder: Description of the method and preliminary data. Neurology and Urodynamics 2005; 24:305-309.Stamm WE, Hooton TM. Management of urinary tract infections in adults. N Engl J Med 1993;329(18):1328-1334.
  • Steers WD, Meythaler JM, Haworth C, Herrell D, Park TS. Effects of acute bolus and chronic continuous intrathecal baclofen on genitourinary dysfunction due to spinal cord pathology. J Urol 1992;148(6):1849-1855.
  • Stohrer M, Bauer P, Giannetti BM, Richter R, Burgdorfer H, Murtz G. Effect of trospium chloride on urodynamic parameters in patients with detrusor hyperreflexia due to spinal cord injuries. A multicentre placebo-controlled double-blind trial. Urol Int 1991;47(3):138-143.
  • Stohrer M, Madersbacher H, Richter R, Wehnert J, Dreikorn K. Efficacy and safety of propiverine in SCI-patients suffering from detrusor hyperreflexia--a double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Spinal Cord 1999;37(3):196-200.
  • Stohrer M, Murtz G, Kramer G, Schnabel F, Arnold EP, Wyndaele J.J. and the Propiverine Investigator Group. Propiverine compared to Oxybutynin in neurogenic detrusor overactivity – results of a randomized, double-blind, multicenter clinical study. European Urology 2007; 51:235–242.
  • Sugimura, T., Arnold, E., English, S., & Moore, J. Chronic suprapubic catheterization in the management of patients with spinal cord injuries: analysis of upper and lower urinary tract complications. BJU International 2008, 101, 1396-1400.
  • Sylora JA, Gonzalez R, Vaughn M, Reinberg Y. Intermittent self-catheterization by quadriplegic patients via a catheterizable Mitrofanoff channel. J Urol 1997;157(1):48-50.
  • Tanagho EA, Schmidt RA.  Bladder pacemaker: scientific basis and clinical future. Urology 1982 20:614–619.
  • Tantisiriwat N, Kittisomprayoonkul W, Sukonthamarn K, Unhasuta C, Suankratay C, Tantisiriwat W et al. Uropathogens and empiric antibiotics for the treatment of urinary tract infections in spinal cord injured patients at rehabilitation center, Thai Red Cross Society during 2001 to 2005. J Med Assoc Thai 2007;90(11):2482-2486.
  • Tow AM, Toh KL, Chan SP, Consigliere D. Botulinum toxin type A for refractory neurogenic detrusor overactivity in spinal cord injured patients in Singapore. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2007;36(1):11-17.
  • Trautner BW, Darouiche RO. Prevention of urinary tract infection in patients with spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med 2002;25(4):277-283.
  • Tsai, S. J., Ying, T. H., Huang, Y. H., Cheng, J. W., Bih, L. I., & Lew, H. L. Transperineal injection of botulinum toxin A for treatment of detrusor sphincter dyssynergia: localization with combined fluoroscopic and electromyographic guidance. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 2009, 90, 832-836.
  • Vaidyananthan S, Soni BM, Brown E, Sett P, Krishnan KR, Bingley J et al. Effect of intermittent urethral catheterization and oxybutynin bladder instillation on urinary continence status and quality of life in a selected group of spinal cord injury patients with neuropathic bladder dysfunction. Spinal Cord 1998;36(6):409-414.
  • Van Kerrebroeck EV, van der Aa HE, Bosch JL, Koldewijn EL, Vorsteveld JH, Debruyne FM. Sacral rhizotomies and electrical bladder stimulation in spinal cord injury. Part I: Clinical and urodynamic analysis. Dutch Study Group on Sacral Anterior Root Stimulation. Eur Urol 1997;31(3):263-271.
  • Van Kerrebroeck PE, Koldewijn EL, Rosier PF, Wijkstra H, Debruyne FM. Results of the treatment of neurogenic bladder dysfunction in spinal cord injury by sacral posterior root rhizotomy and anterior sacral root stimulation. J Urol 1996;155(4):1378-1381.
  • Vapnek JM, Maynard FM, Kim J. A prospective randomized trial of the LoFric hydrophilic coated catheter versus conventional plastic catheter for clean intermittent catheterization. J Urol. 2003; 169:994-998.Vastenholt JM, Snoek GJ, Buschman HPJ, van der Aa HE, Alleman ERJ, IJzerman MJ. A 7-year follow-up of sacral anterior root stimulation for bladder control in patients with a spinal cord injury: Quality of life and users' experiences. Spinal Cord 2003;41(7):397-402.
  • Vastenholt JM, Snoek GJ, Buschman HP, van der Aa HE, Alleman ER, Ijzerman MJ. A 7-year follow-up of sacral anterior root stimulation for bladder control in patients with a spinal cord injury: quality of life and users' experiences. Spinal Cord 2003;41:397-402.
  • Vickrey BG, Shekelle P, Morton S, Clark K, Pathak M, Kamberg C. Prevention and management of urinary tract infections in paralyzed persons. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ ) 1999;(6):1-3.
  • Waites KB, Canupp KC, DeVivo MJ. Efficacy and tolerance of norfloxacin in treatment of complicated urinary tract infection in outpatients with neurogenic bladder secondary to spinal cord injury. Urology 1991;38(6):589-596.
  • Waites KB, Canupp KC, Armstrong S, DeVivo MJ. Effect of cranberry extract on bacteriuria and pyuria in persons with neurogenic bladder secondary to spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med 2004;27(1):35-40.
  • Waites KB, Canupp KC, Roper JF, Camp SM, Chen Y. Evaluation of 3 methods of bladder irrigation to treat bacteriuria in persons with neurogenic bladder. J Spinal Cord Med 2006;29(3):217-226.
  • Waller L, Telander M, Sullivan L. The importance of osmolality in hydrophilic urethral catheters: a crossover study. Spinal Cord 1997;35(4):229-233.
  • Weld KJ, Dmochowski RR. Effect of bladder management on urological complications in spinal cord injured patients. J Urol 2000;163(3):768-772.
  • Wheeler JS, Jr., Robinson CJ, Culkin DJ, Bolan JM. The effect of thigh muscle reconditioning by electrical stimulation on urodynamic activity in SCI patients. J Am Paraplegia Soc 1986;9(1-2):16-23.
  • Wyndaele JJ, De Sy WA, Claessens H. Evaluation of different methods of bladder drainage used in the early care of spinal cord injury patients. Paraplegia 1985;23:18-26.
  • Wyndaele JJ, De Taeye N. Early intermittent self-catheterisation after spinal cord injury. Paraplegia 1990;28(2):76-80.
  • Wyndaele JJ, Van Kerrebroeck P. The effects of 4 weeks treatment with cisapride on cystometric parameters in spinal cord injury patients. A double-blind, placebo controlled study. Paraplegia 1995;33(11):625-627.
  • Wyndaele JJ, Madersbacher H, Kovindha A. Conservative treatment of the neuropathic bladder in spinal cord injured patients. Spinal Cord 2001;39(6):294-300.
  • Xiao CH, Du MX, Dai C, Li B, Nitti VW, de Groat WC. Aan artificial somatic central nervous system autonomic reflex pathway for controllable micturition afer spinal cord injury: Preliminary results in 15 patients. Journal of Urology 2003;170:1237-1241.
  • Yadav A, Vaidyanathan S, Panigrahi D. Clean intermittent catheterisation for the neuropathic bladder. Paraplegia 1993;31(6):380-383.
  • Yavuzer G, Gok H, Tuncer S, Soygur T, Arikan N, Arasil T. Compliance with bladder management in spinal cord injury patients. Spinal Cord 2000;38(12):762-765.
  • Zahariou A, Karagiannis G, Papaioannou P, Stathi K, Michail X. The use of desmopressin in the management of nocturnal enuresis in patients with spinal cord injury. Eura Medicophys 2007;43(3):333-338.

Bone Health

Introduction

A significant decline in hip and knee region bone mineral density (BMD) occurs after motor complete spinal cord injury (SCI) which leads to a lifetime increased risk of lower extremity fragility or low trauma fracture. Preserving and maintaining bone mass is crucial to decrease the risk of fragility fractures. Within the first few days following SCI there is an increase in excreted calcium (known as hypercalciuria) that is 2-4 times that of individuals without SCI who are confined to prolonged bedrest (Bauman & Spungen 2001) and reflects excessive bone resorption. Longitudinal studies also highlight a higher rate of hypercalcemia (excessive calcium in the blood) for people after SCI that leads to rapid bone mineral loss in the first 4-6 months that slows for the remaining first year post injury (Hancock et al. 1980; Frey-Rindova et al. 2000). Early studies also suggest that bone mineral density (BMD) stabilizes by 1-2 years after SCI (Griffiths et al. 1976; Hancock et al. 1980; Garland et al.1992) at 25-50% below that of able-bodied peers in the hip and knee region. Other investigations support a continual loss of bone mass with time since injury (Demirel et al. 1998; Bauman et al. 1999; Eser et al. 2005) and suggest that a steady-state of a lower extremity bone mineral homeostasis is not reached.

The immediate and excessive loss of bone mass post SCI is believed to result from a decrease in mechanical loading as a result of reduced or complete loss of muscle function and/or weight-bearing activities. Autoimmune, neural, vascular, hormonal and nutritional changes may also negatively impact bone but, the relative contributions of these factors are unknown (Jiang et al 2006). The reader is referred to two recent review articles which characterize the regional changes in bone density and architecture (Jiang et al. 2006, Craven et al. 2008). Further, an inadequate dietary calcium intake (Tomey et al 2005) or insufficient vitamin D may contribute to the rate and severity of BMD decline (Bauman et al. 1995). Aging and inactivity accentuate bone resorption further, resulting in site-specific decreases in bone mineral content (trabecular>cortical bone). Additionally, women with motor complete SCI experience regional declines in hip and knee region BMD during menopause that are greater than age-matched able-bodied women (Garland et al. 2001).  These changes in bone density and bone architecture all contribute to the increased risk for low trauma fractures in people with SCI.

Ashe MC, Craven C, Krassioukov A, Eng JJ (2010). Bone Health Following Spinal Cord Injury. In: Eng JJ, Teasell RW, Miller WC, Wolfe DL, Townson AF, Hsieh JTC, Connolly SJ, Mehta S, Sakakibara BM, editors. Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Evidence. Version 3.0 Vancouver: p 1-26.

Fracture Risk following SCI

There is overwhelming evidence that supports the importance of addressing bone health issues early after SCI. A higher incidence of low-trauma fractures exist in people who sustain SCI (Table 1); the majority of low-trauma fractures occur following transfers or activities that involve minimal or no trauma (Comarr et al. 1962; Ragnarsson & Sell; 1981; Freehafer 1995;). The distal femur and proximal tibia (knee region) are most at risk, consistent with site-specific decreases in BMD such that fractures of the distal femur were previously referred to as ‘the paraplegic fracture’ (Comarr et al. 1962).

Risk factors for low-trauma fracture after SCI include: gender, age, time post injury, impairment, low BMI and low knee region BMD. Women have a greater risk compared with men (Vestergaard et al. 1998; Lazo et al. 2001; Nelson et al. 2003; Garland et al. 2004). Increasing age and longer time since injury (Frisbie 1997; McKinley et al.1999; Garland et al. 2004; Garland et al. 2005) increases fracture risk which rises significantly at 10 years post injury. Further, people with paraplegia have more fractures (Frisbie 1997) and those with complete injuries have greater bone mass loss compared with those with incomplete injuries (Garland et al. 2004; Garland et al. 2005). BMD fracture thresholds are values below which low-trauma fractures begin to occur; whereas fracture breakpoints are values below which the majority of fractures occur (Garland et al. 2005). Knee region aBMD and vBMD thresholds for fracture and breakpoint have been identified (Mazess 1990; Eser et al. 2005; Garland et al. 2005). In the general population, individuals with a prior history of low-trauma fracture or a maternal history of fracture have an elevated fracture risk; these risk factors should also be considered during a fracture risk assessments among patients with SCI.

Table 1: Fractures and risk factors for fragility fractures after SCI

  • Low trauma fractures, especially around the knee, are common in people with SCI.

SLOP Detection and Diagnosis

In order to assess and understand your patient’s bone health, it is important to measure their BMD and document their fracture risk. We advocate diagnosing the presence of SLOP based on the following DXA criteria (Table 2).

Table 2: Definition of Sublesional Osteoporosis (SLOP)

We recommend documenting your patients fracture risk by completing the risk factor profile check-list (Craven et al. 2008, Craven et al. 2009). We propose that the presence of ≥3 risk factors implies a moderate fracture risk, while ≥5 risk factors implies a high fracture risk (Table 3).

Table 3: Risk Factors for Lower Extremity Low-trauma Fracture After SCI

Bone Outcome Measures

There are multiple methods for assessing bone health, commonly used tools include: bone imaging, biochemical markers and histomorphometry.

DXA is considered by the World Health Organisation as the “gold standard” to diagnose osteoporosis and is the most widely used assessment technique for determining treatment effectiveness; although in some countries, peripheral quantitative computed tomography (p-QCT) is available as a research tool (Frotzler et al. 2008) Areal BMD (g/cm2) is quantified non-invasively with imaging technologies such as dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and previously with dual energy photon absorptiometry (DPA). DXA measures areal BMD [aBMD= bone mineral content (BMC)(g)/area (cm2)]; whereas p-QCT measures volumetric BMD [vBMD = BMC(g)/volume (cm3)]. There are several established methods for measuring BMD at the knee (Garland et al. 1993; Moreno et al. 2001; Eser et al. 2004; Morse et al. 2009). Regardless of the methodology chosen, assessment of knee region BMD is crucial as it best predicts knee region fracture risk after SCI (Eser et al. 2005; Garland et al. 2005).

Volumetric BMD (g/cm3) is assessed using peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT). Peripheral QCT is a relatively safe and precise technique to differentiate cortical bone from trabecular bone, assess bone geometry and volumetric density. The imaging resolution has continued to improve and a high resolution (HR) pQCT now exists (80 micrometers) to give detailed information on peripheral bone microstructure.

Increases in aBMD or vBMD are presumed to be a suitable surrogate outcome for fracture risk reduction when assessing the effectiveness of SLOP therapy. Whereby, “optimal therapy” would be defined as increases in knee region BMD above the fracture threshold in the absence of low-trauma fracture.

Biochemical markers of bone turnover can be used as an adjunct to DXA in the assessment of bone health among patients with SCI. Serum and urine markers provide useful insight into bone metabolism at specific time points after injury and are an effective tool for monitoring response to therapy. The current therapeutic utility of bone turnover markers is limited by day-to-day, diurnal, inter-individual, and inter-assay variability. For urine markers, results need to be corrected for creatinine (Reiter et al. 2007).

The bone formation markers include bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BALP), osteocalcin (OC N-terminal propeptide of type I collagen (PINP), and C-terminal propeptide of type I collagen (PICP).

Markers of bone resorption include urinary free and total pyridinoline (Pyr) and deoxypyridinoline (DPD) crosslinks, type 1 collagen C-telopeptide (CTX), and N-telopeptide (NTX). Pyr and DPD are molecules that provide stability to collagen and, along with CTX and NTX, are released when collagen is degraded during bone resorption (Brown et al. 2009).

For a bone marker to be useful in assessing the rate of bone turnover and/or monitoring therapy effectiveness, the difference in the rate of bone turnover before and after SCI, as well as the early period versus the late period after SCI, needs to be discernable.

Alignment of the choice of biomarkers across future bone health studies may allow for cross-study comparison or future meta-analyses.

Histomorphometry are measurements from bone biopsies to provide an in-depth understanding of bone. There are two types of bone histomorphometry, dynamic and static. Dynamic histomorphometry involves using substances such as tetracycline to measure tissue growth. Static histomorphometry involves determining the size and types of cells; measurements include length, area or cell counts. Although bone histomorphometry is considered an important tool, it is not always feasible because it requires surgically obtaining bone specimens from consenting participants.

Clinical Guide

In the following sections, prevention and treatment interventions for maintaining bone health after SCI are discussed. As bone loss is greatest immediately following SCI, in this review pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions are classified as either prevention (the participants are less than 1 year post SCI) or treatment (study involved participants who are > 1 year after the injury). The intent is to address two distinct clinical questions: 1.What is the best way to prevent acute regional declines in bone mineral density?; and 2. What are the best treatments for low bone mass of the hip and knee region for people with longstanding SCI?

When selecting a treatment to offer patients, clinicians seek the best available evidence to support their practice. Ideally, one would like to see three randomized control trials (Level 1 evidence) from separate centres demonstrating the efficacy of a therapy prior to routine implementation. Having highlighted this issue, the diversity of interventions, study design and outcome measures make interpretation of the SCI bone health literature challenging and subject to controversy.

The following sections attempt to identify the best available literature to address specific clinical questions.

Pharmacological Therapy: Bisphosphonates

Within weeks after SCI, there is a marked increase in bone resorption (breaking bone down) with a decrease in bone formation (adding new bone) and this is responsible for the significant loss in bone mass. Bisphosphonates are a group of medications that are used to prevent declines in bone mass or treat low BMD; they act to slow down excessive bone resorption. They are generally divided into two types, those with or without nitrogen; each type has a different mechanism of action. Etidronate, Clodronate and Tiludronate do not contain nitrogen while Pamidronate, Alendronate, Ibandronate, Risedronate and Zoledronate contain nitrogen. Etidronate (Didrocal), Alendronate (Fosamax) and Risedronate (Actonel) are oral bisphosphonates, which are currently approved for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis in Canada (Brown et al. 2002). Clodronate (Benefos or Ostac) is available intravenously (IV) and orally for the treatment of osteoporosis.  Tiludronate (Skelid) is available in oral form in the United States. Zoledronic acid (Zoledronate) is a newer once yearly bisphosphonate which is administered via IV infusion. Concurrent supplementation with calcium and vitamin D have been important additions to bisphosphonate therapy for other medical conditions (such as post-menopausal osteoporosis) (Brown et al. 2002) and should be considered when prescribing oral bisphosphonates although the concurrent administration of all three compounds has not been prospectively evaluated.

Pharmacological Therapy: Prevention (within 12 months of injury)

Table 4: Prevention Studies using Pharmacology for Bone Health after a Spinal Cord Injury.

Discussion

Evidence for pharmacologicalprevention of SCI bone loss includes 7 randomized controlled trials (RCT) (n=138 participants) and 1 non-randomized trial (n=124) (Table 2). These studies were difficult to interpret as a group due to the variability in selection of the pharmacological treatment, primary outcome measure, relatively short durations of follow-up, small sample sizes, and the lack of stratification based on impairment level. Preventing bone loss immediately following SCI is challenging given the rapid bone resorption especially in AIS A patients. The majority of studies found bisphosphonates resulted in a reduction of bone loss compared with a control group. The two studies which report that first generation bisphosphonates (Clodronate) can maintain bone were short in duration (3 month intervention) and participants had less severe injury (paraplegia, incomplete SCI) (Minaire et al. 1981,1987). In the studies by Pearson and colleagues (1997) and Nance and colleagues (1999), both groups continued to lose bone, except AIS D participants who had bone density preservation in the lower extremity with bisphosphonates while participants with AIS A had the greatest decline in both studies. A recent study which used a second-generation version of the bisphosphonate, Pamidronate and a longer intervention period found no significant differences between groups for bone loss after 1 year (Baumann 2005). Gilchrist and colleagues noted a significant difference in BMD at the hip with once weekly Alendronate. In a recent investigation, Shapiro and colleagues (2007) tested the effect of once yearly IV Zoledronate with significant improvement in BMD at the hip at 6 months that returned to baseline values at 12 months; the control group on the placebo treatment lost bone over the 12 months. Although there is evidence that bisphosphonates may reduce bone resorption, current medications do not totally prevent BMD decline. Nonetheless, there is a window of opportunity soon after injury where SLOP prevention may be effective, and there is sufficient evidence of moderate prevention efficacy that patients should be counseled on the available therapies and allowed to ­­make their own decision regarding treatment.

Conclusions

  • There is level 1 evidence (from 3 RCTs) (Chappard et al. 1995; Minaire et al. 1981, 1987) that oral Tiludronate and Clodronate prevent a decrease in BMD of the hip and knee region with no adverse effects on bone mineralization in men with paraplegia.
  • There is level 1 (from 1 RCT) (Pearson et al. 1997) that oral Etidronate prevents a decrease in BMD of the hip and knee region in people with incomplete paraplegia or tetraplegia (AIS D impairment) who return to walking within 3 months of the SCI.
  • There is level 1 evidence (from 1 RCT) (Gilchrist et al. 2007) that once weekly oral Alendronate maintains BMD at the hip.
  • There is level 1 evidence (from 1 RCT) (Shapiro et al. 2007) that once yearly IV Infusion of Zoledronate does not prevent a decline in hip region bone mass at 12 months for men and women with motor complete injuries.
  • There is level 1 evidence (from 1 RCT) (Bauman et al. 2005) that Pamidronate 60mg IV seven times per year and level 2 evidence (from 1 non-randomized prospective controlled trial) (Nance et al. 1999) that Pamidronate 30 mg IV six times per year is not effective for the prevention of BMD loss at the hip and knee region early after SCI in men and women who have motor complete paraplegia or tetraplegia.
  • Ideally, bone health management should be considered early following SCI as there is a significant decline in lower extremity BMD in the first year after injury and the efficacy of drug interventions appear to be most effective with a shorter time period between injury onset and drug administration.
  • Oral Tiludronate and Clodronate prevent a decrease in BMD of the hip and knee region with no adverse effects on bone mineralization in men with paraplegia.
  • Oral Etidronate prevents a decrease in BMD of the hip and knee region in people with incomplete paraplegia or tetraplegia.
  • Once weekly oral Alendronate maintains BMD at the hip.
  • Once yearly IV infusion Zoledronate does not maintain hip BMD at 12 months.
  • Pamidronate 30 mg IV or 60 mg IV 4x/year is not effective for the prevention of BMD loss at the hip and knee region early after SCI people with motor complete paraplegia or tetraplegia.

Pharmacological Therapy: Treatment

Table 5: Treatment Studies using Pharmacology for Bone Health after a Spinal Cord Injury.

Discussion

Evidence for pharmacological treatment of SCI bone loss includes 3 RCTs (n=124 participants). In these studies, the treatment group experienced improvement or maintenance in bone health at various sites. For the two studies that tested Alendronate, the extent of improvement was greater in the study by Zehnder et al. 2004 who found an increase in BMD at the spine with maintenance of BMD at the hip and tibia. In contrast, Moran de Brioto et al. 2005 only found a non-significant increase in BMD in the upper extremity and a significant increase in total BMD. The difference in response of outcomes could be a result of the younger participants with less severe injuries in the work by Zehnder and coworkers. Bauman and colleagues noted positive results in leg BMD for participants who received vitamin D.

This review has provided conflicting support for using first and second generation oral bisphosphonates for prevention of low bone mass and some support for treatment of low bone mass. Despite the benefits of these medications, they are not without their complications. Oral bisphosphonates must be ingested on an empty stomach, with 4-8oz of water, followed by sitting up for one-hour post ingestion prior to taking any other food or medication. About 1% of the ingested oral bisphosphonate is absorbed in the upper intestine, yet it remains in the body in an inactive form for several months or years thereafter. Oral bisphosphonate therapy can cause side effects; joint pain, stomach upset and diarrhea being the most frequently reported adverse effects. Intravenous formulations of bisphosphonates are available in monthly, quarterly and annual preparations, and have a greater relative potency. Although their common short-term side effects include fever, low serum calcium and transient decrease in white blood cells, IV preparations are attractive due to the flexibility in dosing regimens, assured adherence to therapy and the reduced relative risk of an adverse upper gastrointestinal event.

Bisphosphonates should be used with caution in pre-menopausal women due to the unknown effects of these medications on the fetus during pregnancy. Patients taking acetylsalicylicacid (ASA), corticosteroids or NSAIDS may require gastrointestinal prophylaxis as these medications in combination with bisphosphonates increase the relative risk of developing a gastric ulcer or bleeding. Many questions regarding the safety of these medications among people with SCI and the optimal duration of therapy remain. Zolendronate, an IV bisphosphonate, has been reported to increase the incidence of serious atrial fibrillation resulting in hospitalization or disability among 1-3% of elderly non-SCI patients (HORIZON study, Black et al. 2007). Zolendronate should be used with caution in elderly patients or patients with premorbid atrial fibrillation or arrhythmia secondary to autonomic dysfunction after SCI. The risk of osteonecrosis of the jaw is highest among people with a prior history of cancer or radiotherapy.  Both osteonecrosis of the jaw and arrhythmia should be discussed during consent for oral or IV bisphosphonate therapy.

It has been shown that oral bisphosphonates may be taken safely without adverse effects on bone metabolism for 10 years in postmenopausal women (Bone et al. 2004). Data from postmenopausal non-SCI women suggests BMD should be monitored at least alternate years in patients who stop taking oral bisphosphonates; those with a rapid decline in BMD of >10% in two years or >5% from baseline should be switched to alternate treatment or resume bisphosphonate therapy (Colon-Emeric 2006).

Conclusion

  • There is level 1 evidence (from 1 RCT) (Zehnder et al. 2004) that Alendronate 10 mg daily and Calcium 500mg orally 3x/day is effective for the maintenance of BMD of the total body, hip and knee region for men with paraplegia.
  • There is level 1 evidence (from 1 RCT) (Bauman et al. 2005b) that vitamin D analog is effective for maintaining leg BMD.
  • Alendronate 10 mg daily and Calcium 500 mg orally 3x/day is effective for the maintenance of BMD of the total body, hip and knee region for men with paraplegia.
  • Vitamin D analog is effective for maintenance of BMD in the leg.

Non-Pharmacologic Therapy: Rehabilitation Modalities

Rehabilitation options after SCI for bone health focus on stimulating muscles and encouraging weight-bearing. This section includes five modalities; functional electrical stimulation (FES), electrical stimulation (ES), standing and walking, treadmill training and ultrasound. FES is an important option to stimulate muscle with the goal of increasing regional BMD, and involves the use of surface or implanted electrodes to stimulate standing, ambulation or bicycling (cycle ergometry). The FES-cycle ergometer uses a series of electrodes placed over the hamstrings, quadriceps and gluteal muscles of the legs to simulate a cycling pattern. Weight-bearing activities are also used for bone health after SCI; these modalities include either passive (tilt-table or standing frame) or active weight-bearing activities with or without assistance from FES. Many FES studies have enrolled participants with both acute and chronic injuries and are therefore difficult to classify as pure prevention or treatment interventions. For the purpose of this review, studies that enrolled participants that ranged from the acute phase to > 1 year were included with the treatment literature as the majority of their participants were in the chronic phase.

Non-Pharmacologic Therapy: Prevention (within 12 months of injury)

Table 6: Prevention Studies Using Rehabilitation Modalities for Bone Health after SCI

Discussion

Evidence for non-pharmacologicalprevention of SCI bone loss includes nine investigations (n=147 participants). This includes three RCTs (54 participants), four non-randomized controlled trials (84 participants) and two pre-post studies (9 participants) (Table 9.4). As with pharmacological studies, there were difficulties with interpretation because of low numbers of participants and variability with the primary outcome measures. For each of the five different modalities there is limited evidence available and there was variability in the selection of the primary outcomes. The therapeutic ultrasound study by Warden and coworkers found no significant improvement in bone health after a 6 week intervention. Although prospective observational data (Frey-Rindova et al. 2000) highlight the loss of bone in the early phase (first 6-months post SCI), there was no significant influence of self-reported physical activity level. Overall, the evidence suggests that rehabilitation modalities did not prevent bone mass decline in the acute phase after SCI.

Conclusion

  • There is level 1 evidence (from one RCT) (Warden et al. 2001) that short-term (6 weeks) ultrasound is not effective for treating bone loss after SCI.
  • There is level 2 evidence (from 1 non-randomized prospective controlled trial) (Shields et al. 2006a) that ES reduced the decline in BMD in the leg.
  • There is level 2 evidence (from 1 non-randomized prospective controlled trial) (Eser et al. 2003) that FES-cycling did not improve or maintain bone at the tibial midshaft in the acute phase.
  • There is level 4 evidence (from 1 pre-post study) (Giangregorio et al. 2005) that walking and level 1 evidence (from 1 RCT) (Ben et al. 2005) that standing in the acute phase did not differ from immobilization for bone mass decline at the tibia.
  • Short term (6 weeks) therapeutic ultrasound is not effective for preventing bone loss after SCI.
  • FES-cycling does not improve or maintain bone at the tibial midshaft in the acute phase.

Non-Pharmacologic Therapy: Treatment

In this section, non-pharmacological rehabilitation treatment modalities are divided into five sub-sections: Electrical stimulation, vibration, functional electrical stimulation (FES) cycle ergometry, standing and walking (Tables 7-10). Both ES and FES use cyclical patterns of electrical stimulation that simulate muscular activity.; However, FES is directed towards the attainment of purposeful tasks such as cycling or walking. Electrical stimulation, on the other hand, is focused on producing muscle contractions (isometric, isotonic). In some interventions, ES techniques are used as a training stimulus to prepare muscles for a subsequent FES training condition.

Electrical Stimulation

Table 7: Treatment Studies Using Electrical Stimulation for Bone Health after SCI

Discussion

Although there were no randomized controlled trials that assessed the effect of electrical stimulation, Bélanger et al. (2000) produced impressive results with a level 2, non-randomized trial which used 1 limb as the treatment and the other as the control limb.  Following training, the BMD recovered close to 30% of bone loss when compared with able-bodied values.  Stimulation effects only occur over the areas of stimulation and return to baseline within months once stimulation is stopped (Mohr et al. 1997).

Conclusion

  • There is level 2 evidence (from 1 prospective controlled trial) (Bélanger et al. 2000)that electrical stimulation either increased or maintained BMD over the stimulated areas.
  • Electrical stimulation can maintain or increase BMD over the stimulated areas.

Vibration

Table 8: Treatment Studies Using Vibration for Bone Health after SCI

Vibration training is a relatively new treatment option used for potential benefits of muscle and/or bone health. This investigation found no significant changes in upper extremity BMC or BMD after 12 weeks of vibration.

Conclusion

  • There is level 4 evidence (from 1 pre-post study) (Melchiorri et al. 2007) that vibration training did not improve or maintain BMC in the arms.

FES Cycle Ergometry

Table 9: Treatment Studies Using FES Cycle Ergometry for Bone Health after SCI

Discussion

For FES-Cycling there are mixed results for bone outcomes. Three studies found an increase in BMD (Chen et al. 2005; Mohr et al. 1997; Frotzler et al. 2008) at the proximal tibia or distal femur while there was no significant within-participant BMD change at the hip in 3 pre-post studies (Leeds et al. 1990; Pacy et al. 1988; and BeDell et al. 1996) The FES-cycling studies which reported a positive effect on bone parameters used protocols that were at least 3 sessions/week for 6 months in duration, and increased bone parameters over areas directly affected by stimulated muscles (e.g. quads, distal femur and proximal tibia). Although one study showed that FES-cycling intervention needed to be maintained or bone gains were lost (Chen et al. 2005), Frotzler and colleagues found BMD and BMC were preserved at the distal sites for some participants at 12 months. FES shows promise as an effective treatment around the knee; however the limited availability of cycle ergometry for home or longitudinal use may limit its generalizibility if the therapy cannot be sustained outside a clinical trial scenario.

Conclusion

  • There is level 4 evidence that FES cycle ergometry increased regional lower extremity BMD over areas stimulated.
  • FES cycle ergometry may increase lower extremity BMD over areas stimulated.

Standing

Table 10: Treatment Studies Using Standing or Walking for Bone Health after SCI

Discussion

There is inconclusive evidence for Reciprocating Gait Orthosis, long leg braces or passive standing as a treatment for low bone mass after SCI. One cross-sectional study (Goemaere et al. 1994) used a self-report physical activity measure to highlight the potential for standing to reduce bone loss at the femoral shaft; patients with long leg braces had a significantly higher trochanter and total BMD compared with standing frame or standing wheelchair. In contrast, another cross-sectional investigation of bone outcomes and self-report physical activity measures found no effect of activity on lower extremity bone parameters (Jones et al. 2002).

Conclusion

  • There is inconclusive evidence for Reciprocating Gait Orthosis, long leg braces, passive standing or self-reported physical activity as a treatment for low bone mass.
  • There is inconclusive evidence for Reciprocating Gait Orthosis, long leg braces, passive standing or self-reported physical activity as a treatment for low bone mass.

General Discussion

The risk for low trauma fractures after SCI has been established and low bone mass is an important factor to be considered. In 2002, the Canadian Medical Association published clinical practice guidelines for prevention and treatment of bone health (Brown et al. 2002). Currently, these guidelines do not specifically address persons with spinal cord injury. While, they do provide a resourcefor osteoporosis diagnosis, prevention and treatment, the lack of SCI-specific, consensus-based guidelines for SLOP, has resulted in diverse SLOP screening, prevention, and treatment practices among SCI clinicians (Morse et al. 2008; Ashe et al. 2009). Hopefully future national guidelines will provide recommendations for people who have SCI and diverse impairments that lead to reduced weight-bearing, muscle activity and physical activity levels. Recently a decision guide has been published for rehabilitation professionals on the identification and management of bone health related issues for people with SCI (Craven et al. 2008, Craven et al. 2009).

In this review we note some support for pharmacological agents, but less support for rehabilitation modalities for the prevention and management of bone health in people with SCI. Our results have some similarities with the recent systematic review by Bryson and Gourlay (2009). Our results for the non-pharmacological treatment of bone health are consistent with the review by Bering-Sorensen and colleagues (2009) highlighting promise with some modalities. However, this review differs by reporting evidence for early (acute) and late (>12 months) intervention with rehabilitation modalities and therefore provides a description of the results based on whether the goal of therapy is prevention or treatment of SLOP. In the past 40 years there have been a number of interventions (both pharmacological and rehabilitation modalities) aimed to maintain or slow down bone mass decline after SCI yet consistent methodological oversights have emerged including: small sample sizes and broad inclusion criteria that do not always account for gender, time since injury or impairment differences between participants.

The pharmacological interventions (either prevention or treatment interventions) discussed here report stronger methodologies— all except one were RCTs with PEDro scores ranging from 6-10 indicating moderate to high quality. In contrast, the studies employing rehabilitation modalities had low numbers of participants and only 3 of the 25 studies were RCTs. These factors contribute to difficulties drawing generalisible conclusions regarding the impact of rehab interventions on bone parameters. Nonetheless, despite the lack of evidence to establish the effectiveness of these rehab modalities on bone parameters, it does not negate these treatments as beneficial to other body systems. For example, FES-cycling may have small effects on bone, but this modality has been shown to have large effects on cardiovascular health (Jacobs & Nash 2004).

There are a few key points to consider when interpreting the results from interventions designed to maintain and/or improve bone parameters after SCI. These include biological differences in bone development and maintenance between men and women, the natural decline in bone mass with aging and the selected primary outcome measure. Age-related changes in bone mass affect both women and men but the pattern of change is different because estrogen plays such a dominant role in bone remodeling.  Consequently in women, the loss of estrogen at menopause initiates a rapid loss of bone that eventually slows but continues throughout life. Men generally do not experience the rapid phase of bone loss with aging rather, only a slower phase of bone loss is observed. Therefore, keeping in mind that bone mass declines over time, a study that reports no significant difference in BMD between two time periods 6 months apart may be interpreted as positive because of the anticipated loss.

Due to the diversity of primary outcomes (BMD bydual photon absorptiometry [DPA], DXA or pQCT, urine or blood markers) it is difficult to pool the results from multiple studies. When measuring parameters such as urine or blood biomarkers, studies of short duration may yield significant results. However, using imaging, cortical bone remodeling can take at least 9 months in order to observe changes within participants over time. Consequently, investigations that did not maintain an intervention for at least 6 months may not show changes, but, the results cannot be interpreted as negative. Importantly, all primary outcomes for bone health after SCI are surrogate measures, that is, there has yet to be a study published in this area that investigates the effect of an intervention (either pharmacological or non-pharmacological) on fracture reduction. Fracture reduction studies are somewhat infeasible due to cost and the large number of participants that would needed and followed longitudinally. Consequently, the clinical significance of the interventions based on fractures for this population remains to be determined. Prospective multicentre intervention studies using common interventions and outcome assessments are urgently needed.

Conclusion

  • There is a significant risk for low-trauma fractures after SCI; the risk increases for women, people with motor complete injuries (AIS A and B) and longer duration of injury. Early assessment and ongoing monitoring of bone health are essential elements of SCI care. There is Level 1 evidence for the prevention and treatment of bone loss using medications; however, non-pharmacological evidence for preventing a decline in bone mass and treating low bone mass is poor. Interpretation and pooling of bone health studies is limited by small samples, diverse treatment protocols, heterogeneous samples (in terms of impairment and injury duration) and short treatment durations given the time required to detect improvements in bone parameters and variability associated with different imaging technologies. As noted in two recent publications (Craven et al. 2008, Ashe et al. 2009), a consensus regarding the ideal duration of therapy and choice of outcome measures would advance the field.
  • Early assessment and monitoring of bone mass after SCI are essential to identify low bone mass and quantify risk of lower extremity fragility fracture.
  • Prevention with oral bisphosphonates (Tiludronate, Clodronate and Etidronate) may slow the early decline in hip and knee region bone mass after SCI. There is limited evidence that treatment with oral bisphosphonates maintains hip and knee region bone mass late after SCI.
  • There is a lack of definitive evidence supporting non-pharmacological interventions for either prevention or treatment of bone loss after SCI.

Summary

  • There is level 1 evidence (from 3 RCTs) (Minaire et al. 1981, 1987; Chappard et al. 1995) that oral Tiludronate and Clodronate prevent a decrease in BMD of the hip and knee region with no adverse effects on bone mineralization in men with paraplegia.
  • There is level 1 (from 1 RCT) (Pearson et al. 1997) that oral Etidronate prevents a decrease in BMD of the hip and knee region in people with incomplete paraplegia or tetraplegia (AIS D impairment) who return to walking within 3 months of the SCI.
  • There is level 1 evidence (from 1 RCT) (Gilchrist et al. 2007) that once weekly oral Alendronate maintains BMD at the hip.
  • There is level 1 evidence (from 1 RCT) (Shapiro et al. 2007) once yearly IV Infusion Zoledronate does not prevent a decline in hip region BMD at 12 months among patients with motor complete injuries
  • There is level 1 evidence (from 1 RCT) (Bauman et al. 2005) that Pamidronate 60mg IV seven times per year and level 2 evidence (from 1 non-randomized prospective controlled trial) (Nance et al. 1999) that Pamidronate 30 mg IV six times per year is not effective for the prevention of BMD loss at the hip and knee region early after SCI in men and women who have motor complete paraplegia or tetraplegia.
  • There is level 1 evidence (from 1 RCT) (Zehnder et al. 2004) that Alendronate 10 mg daily and Calcium 500mg orally 3x/day is effective for the maintenance of BMD of the total body, hip and knee region for men with paraplegia.
  • There is level 1 evidence (from 1 RCT) (Bauman et al. 2005b) that vitamin D analog is effective for maintaining leg BMD.
  • There is level 1 evidence (from one RCT) (Warden et al. 2001) that short-term (6 weeks) ultrasound is not effective for treating bone loss after SCI.
  • There is level 2 evidence (from 1 non-randomized prospective controlled trial) (Shields et al. 2006a) that ES reduced the decline in BMD in the leg.
  • There is level 2 evidence (from 1 non-randomized prospective controlled trial) (Eser et al. 2003) that FES-cycling did not improve or maintain bone at the tibial midshaft in the acute phase.
  • There is level 4 evidence (from 1 pre-post study) (Giangregorio et al. 2005) that walking and level 1 evidence (from 1 RCT) (Ben et al. 2005) that standing in the acute phase did not differ from immobilization for bone loss at the tibia.
  • There is level 2 evidence (from 1 prospective controlled trial) (Bélanger et al. 2000) that electrical stimulation either increased or maintained BMD over the stimulated areas
  • There is level 4 evidence (from 1 pre-post study) (Melchiorri et al. 2007) that vibration training did not improve or maintain BMC in the arms.
  • There is level 4 evidence that FES cycle ergometry of at least 6 months duration may increased regional lower extremity BMD over areas stimulated.
  • There is inconclusive evidence for Reciprocating Gait Orthosis, long leg braces, passive standing or self-reported physical activity as a treatment for low bone mass.

Key Points

Bone Health & Fracture

  • Low trauma fractures, especially around the knee, are common in people with SCI.
  • Bone health management should begin early following SCI as there is a significant decline in lower extremity BMD in the first year and the efficacy of drug interventions appear to be most effective with a shorter time period between injury onset and drug administration
  • Measurement and monitoring of hip and knee region BMD after SCI are essential to identify low bone mass and quantify lower extremity fracture risk.

Pharmacologic Therapy for Prevention of SLOP

  • Oral Tiludronate and Clodronate prevent a decrease in BMD of the hip and knee region with no adverse effects on bone mineralization in men with paraplegia.
  • Oral Etidronate prevents a decrease in BMD of the hip and knee region in people with AIS D paraplegia or tetraplegia.
  • Once weekly oral Alendronate maintains BMD at the hip in men and women with AIS A-C paraplegia.
  • Once yearly IV infusion Zoledronate does not maintain hip BMD at 12 months in men and women with AIS A or B paraplegia or tetraplegia.
  • Pamidronate 30 mg IV or 60 mg IV 4x/year is not effective for the prevention of BMD loss at the hip and knee region early after SCI people with AIS A paraplegia or tetraplegia.
  • In summary, there is limited evidence that bisphosphonates prevent hip and knee region BMD decline after SCI, although they are moderately effective for reducing the rate of bone resorption and degree of BMD decline in the hip and knee region.

Pharmacologic Therapy for Treatment of SLOP

  • Alendronate 10 mg daily and Calcium 500 mg orally 3x/day is effective for the maintenance of BMD of the total body, hip and knee region for men with paraplegia.
  • Vitamin D analog is effective for maintenance of BMD in the leg.
  • Short term (6 weeks) therapeutic ultrasound is not effective for preventing bone loss after SCI.

Non-pharmacologic Therapy for Prevention and/or Treatment

  • FES-cycling does not improve or maintain bone at the tibial midshaft in the acute phase but may increase/maintain lower extremity BMD the longer time since injury.
  • Electrical stimulation can maintain or increase BMD over the stimulated areas.
  • There is inconclusive evidence for Reciprocating Gait Orthosis, long leg braces, passive standing or self-reported physical activity as a treatment for low bone mass.
  • There is a lack of definitive evidence supporting non-pharmacological interventions for either prevention or treatment of bone loss after a SCI.

References

  • Bauman WA, Zhong YG, Schwartz E. Vitamin D deficiency in veterans with chronic spinal cord injury. Metabolism 1995;44:1612-6.
  • Bauman WA, Spungen AM, Wang J, Pierson RN Jr, Schwartz E. Continuous loss of bone during chronic immobilization: a monozygotic twin study. Osteoporos Int 1999;10:123-7.
  • Bauman WA, Spungen AM. Body Composition in Aging: Adverse Changes in Able-Bodied Persons and in Those with Spinal Cord Injury. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 2001;6:22-36.
  • Bauman WA, Wecht JM, Kirshblum S, Spungen AM, Morrison N, Cirnigliaro C, et al. Effect of pamidronate administration on bone in patients with acute spinal cord injury. J Rehabil Res Dev 2005a;42:305-313.
  • Bauman WA, Spungen AM, Morrison N, Zhang RL, Schwartz E.  Effect of vitamin D analog on leg bone mineral density in patients with chronic spinal cord injury.  J Rehabil Res Dev. 2005b;42:625-634.
  • BeDell KK, Scremin AM, Perell KL, Kunkel CF. Effects of functional electrical stimulation-induced lower extremity cycling on bone density of spinal cord-injured patients. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1996;75:29-34.
  • Belanger M, Stein RB, Wheeler GD, Gordon T, Leduc B. Electrical stimulation: can it increase muscle strength and reverse osteopenia in spinal cord injured individuals? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000;8:1090-1098.
  • Ben M, Harvey L, Denis S, et al.  Does 12 weeks of regular standing prevent loss of ankle mobility and bone mineral density in people with recent spinal cord injuries? Aust J Physiother. 2005;51:251-256.
  • Biering-Sørensen F, Hansen B, Lee BS.  Non-pharmacological treatment and prevention of bone loss after spinal cord injury: a systematic review. Spinal Cord. 2009 Jul;47:508-18.
  • Black DM, Delmas PD, Eastell R, Reid IR, Boonen S, Cauley JA, el al. HORIZON Pivotal Fracture Trial. Once yearly zoledronic acid for treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis New Engl J of Med. 2007;356:1809-22.
  • Bloomfield SA, Mysiw WJ, Jackson RD. Bone mass and endocrine adaptations to training in spinal cord injured individuals. Bone 1996;19:61-68.
  • Bone HG, Hosking D, Devogelaer JP, Tucci JR, Emkey RD, Tonino RP, Rodriguez-Portales JA, Downs RW, Gupta J, Santora AC, Liberman UA; Alendronate Phase III Osteoporosis Treatment Study Group.Ten years' experience with alendronate for osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:1189-99.
  • Brown JP, Josse RG; Scientific Advisory Council of the Osteoporosis Society of Canada. 2002 clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada. CMAJ 2002;12;167(10 Suppl):S1-34.
  • Bryson JE, Gourlay ML.  Bisphosphonate use in acute and chronic spinal cord injury: a systematic review. J Spinal Cord Med. 2009;32:215-25.
  • Carvalho DCL, Garlipp CR, Bottini PV, Afaz SH, Moda MA, Cliquet Jr A. Effect of treadmill gait on bone markers and bone mineral density of quadriplegic subjects.  Braz J Med Biol Res. 2006;36:1357-1363.
  • Chappard D, Minaire P, Privat C, Berard E, Mendoza-Sarmiento J, Tournebise H, et al. Effects of tiludronate on bone loss in paraplegic patients. J Bone Miner Res 1995;10:112-118.
  • Chen B, Mechanick JI, Nierman DM, Stein A. Combined calcitriol-pamidronate therapy for bone hyperresorption in spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med 2001;24:235-240.
  • Chen SC, Lai CH, Chan WP, Huang MH, Tsai HW, Chen JJ. Increases in bone mineral density after functional electrical stimulation cycling exercises in spinal cord injured patients. Disabil Rehabil 2005;27:1337-1341.
  • Clark JM, Jelbart M, Rischbieth H, et al.  Physiological effects of lower extremity functional electrical stimulation in early spinal cord injury: lack of efficacy to prevent bone loss. Spinal Cord. 2007;45:78-85.
  • Comarr AE, Hutchinson RH, Bors E. Extremity fractures of patients with spinal cord injuries. Am J Surg 1962;103:732-739.
  • Craven BC, Robertson LA, McGillivray CF, Adachi JD.  Detection and Treatment of Sublesional Osteoporosis Among Patients with Chronic Spinal Cord Injury: Proposed Paradigms. Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation 2009;14:1-22.
  • Craven BC, Giangregorio L, Robertson L, Delparte JJ, Ashe MC, Eng JJ.  Sublesional Osteoporosis Prevention, Detection, and Treatment: A Decision Guide for Rehabilitation Clinicians Treating Patients with Spinal Cord Injury. Critical Review in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 2008;20:277–321.
  • de Bruin ED, Frey-Rindova P, Herzog RE, Dietz V, Dambacher MA, Stussi E. Changes of tibia bone properties after spinal cord injury: effects of early intervention. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80:214-220.
  • Demirel G, Yilmaz H, Paker N, Onel S. Osteoporosis after spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 1998;36:822-5.
  • Eser P, de Bruin ED, Telley I, Lechner HE, Knecht H, Stussi E. Effect of electrical stimulation-induced cycling on bone mineral density in spinal cord-injured patients. Eur J Clin Invest 2003;33:412-419.
  • Eser P, Frotzler A, Zehnder Y, Denoth J. Fracture threshold in the femur and tibia of people with spinal cord injury as determined by peripheral quantitative computed tomography. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:498-504.
  • Frey-Rindova P, de Bruin ED, Stussi E, Dambacher MA, Dietz V. Bone mineral density in upper and lower extremities during 12 months after spinal cord injury measured by peripheral quantitative computed tomography. Spinal Cord 2000;38:26-32.
  • Frisbie JH. Fractures after myelopathy: the risk quantified. J Spinal Cord Med 1997;20:66-69.
  • Frotzler A, Coupaud S, Perret C, Kakabeeke T, Hunt K, Eser P. Effect of detraining on the bone and muscle tissue in subjects with chronic spinal injury after a period of ellectrically-stiumlated cycling: a small cohert study. J rehabil Med 2009; 41:282-5
  • Frotzler A, Coupaud S, Perret C, Kakabeeke T, Hunt K, Donaldson N, Eser P. High-volume FES-cycling partially reverses done loss in people with chornic spinal cord injury. Bone 2008 43 169-76
  • Garland DE, Stewart CA, Adkins RH, Hu SS, Rosen C, Liotta FJ, Weinstein DA. Osteoporosis after spinal cord injury. J Orthop Res 1992;10:371-8.
  • Garland DE, Adkins RH, Stewart CA, Ashford R, Vigil D. Regional Osteoporosis in Women Who Have a Complete Spinal Cord Injury. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001; 83:1195-1200.
  • Garland DE, Adkins RH, Kushwaha V, Stewart C. Risk factors for osteoporosis at the knee in the spinal cord injury population. J Spinal Cord Med 2004; 27:202-206.
  • Garland DE, Adkins RH, Stewart CA. Fracture threshold and risk for osteoporosis and pathologic fractures in individuals with spinal cord injury. Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation. 2005;11:61-69.
  • Giangregorio LM, Hicks AL, Webber CE, Phillips SM, Craven BC, Bugaresti JM, et al. Body weight supported treadmill training in acute spinal cord injury: impact on muscle and bone. Spinal Cord 2005;43:649-657.
  • Giangregorio LM, Webber CE, Phillips SM, Hicks AL, Craven BC, Bugaresti JM, et al.  Can body weight supported treadmill training increase bone mass and reverse muscle atrophy in individuals with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury? Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2006;31:283-291.
  • Gilchrist NL, Frampton CM, Acland RH, Nicholls MG, March RL, Maguire P, et al.  Alendronate Prevents Bone Loss in Patients with Acute Spinal Cord Injury: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007:92:1385-1390.
  • Goemaere S, Van Laere M, De Neve P, Kaufman JM. Bone mineral status in paraplegic patients who do or do not perform standing. Osteoporos Int 1994;4:138-143.
  • Goktepe A, Tugco I, Alaca, R, Gunduz S, Nikent M. Does standing protect bone density in patients with chronic spinal cord injury? JSCM 2008;31:197-201
  • Griffiths HJ, Bushueff B, Zimmerman RE. Investigation of the loss of bone mineral in patients with spinal cord injury. Paraplegia 1976;14:207-12.
  • Hancock DA, Reed GW, Atkinson PJ. Bone and soft tissue changes in paraplegic patients. Paraplegia 1979;17:267-71.
  • Hangartner TN, Rodgers MM, Glaser RM, Barre PS. Tibial bone density loss in spinal cord injured patients: effects of FES exercise. J Rehabil Res Dev 1994;31:50-61.
  • Jacobs PL, Nash MS. Exercise recommendations for individuals with spinal cord injury. Sports Med 2004;34:727-51.
  • Jones LM, Legge M, Goulding A. Intensive exercise may preserve bone mass of the upper limbs in spinal cord injured males but does not retard demineralization of the lower body. Spinal Cord 2002;40:230-235.
  • Kaplan PE, Roden W, Gilbert E, Richards L, Goldschmidt JW. Reduction of hypercalciuria in tetraplegia after weight-bearing and strengthening exercises. Paraplegia 1981;19:289-293.
  • Kunkel CF, Scremin AM, Eisenberg B, Garcia JF, Roberts S, Martinez S. Effect of "standing" on spasticity, contracture, and osteoporosis in paralyzed males. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993;74:73-78.
  • Lazo MG, Shirazi P, Sam M, Giobbie-Hurder A, Blacconiere MJ, Muppidi M. Osteoporosis and risk of fracture in men with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2001;39:208-214.
  • Leeds EM, Klose J, Ganz W, Serafini A, Green BA. Bone mineral density after bicycle ergometry training. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1990;71:207-9.
  • McKinley WO, Jackson AB, Cardenas DD, DeVivo MJ. Long-term medical complications after traumatic spinal cord injury: a regional model systems analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80:1402-1410.
  • Melchiorri G, Andreoli A, Padura E, Sorge R, De Lorenzo A. Use of vibration exercise in spinal cord injury patients who regularly practice sport. Funct Neurol. 2007;22:151-154
  • Minaire P, Berard E, Meunier PJ, Edouard C, Goedert G, Pilonchery G. Effects of disodium dichloromethylene diphosphonate on bone loss in paraplegic patients. J Clin Invest 1981;68:1086-1092.
  • Minaire P, Depassio J, Berard E, Meunier PJ, Edouard C, Pilonchery G, et al. Effects of clodronate on immobilization bone loss. Bone 1987;8 Suppl 1:S63-8.
  • Mohr T, Podenphant J, Biering-Sorensen F, Galbo H, Thamsborg G, Kjaer M. Increased bone mineral density after prolonged electrically induced cycle training of paralyzed limbs in spinal cord injured man. Calcif Tissue Int 1997;61:22-25.
  • Moran de Brito CM, Battistella LR, Saito ET, Sakamoto H. Effect of alendronate on bone mineral density in spinal cord injury patients: a pilot study. Spinal Cord 2005;43:341-348.
  • Nance PW, Schryvers O, Leslie W, Ludwig S, Krahn J, Uebelhart D. Intravenous pamidronate attenuates bone density loss after acute spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80:243-251.
  • Needham-Shropshire BM, Broton JG, Klose KJ, Lebwohl N, Guest RS, Jacobs PL. Evaluation of a training program for persons with SCI paraplegia using the Parastep 1 ambulation system: part 3. Lack of effect on bone mineral density.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997;78:799-803.
  • Nelson A, Ahmed S, Harrow J, Fitzgerald S, Sanchez-Anguiano A, Gavin-Dreschnack D. Fall-related fractures in persons with spinal cord impairment: a descriptive analysis. SCI Nurs 2003;20:30-37.
  • Ogilvie C, Bowker P, Rowley DI. The physiological benefits of paraplegic orthotically aided walking. Paraplegia 1993;31:111-115.
  • Pacy PJ, Hesp R, Halliday DA, Katz D, Cameron G, Reeve J. Muscle and bone in paraplegic patients, and the effect of functional electrical stimulation. Clin Sci (Lond) 1988;75:481-487.
  • Pearson EG, Nance PW, Leslie WD, Ludwig S. Cyclical etidronate: its effect on bone density in patients with acute spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997;78:269-272.
  • Ragnarsson KT, Sell GH. Lower extremity fractures after spinal cord injury: a retrospective study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1981;62:418-423.
  • Rodgers MM, Glaser RM, Figoni SF, Hooker SP, Ezenwa BN, Collins SR, et al. Musculoskeletal responses of spinal cord injured individuals to functional  stimulation-induced knee extension exercise training. J Rehabil Res Dev 1991;28:19-26.
  • Shapiro J, Smith B, Beck T, Ballard P, Dapthary M, BrintzenhofeSzoc K, et al. Treatment with Zoledronic Acid Ameliorates Negative Geometric Changes in the Proximal Femur following Acute Spinal Cord Injury. Calcif Tissue Int. 2007;80:316–322.
  • Shields RK, Dudley-Javoroski S, Law LA. Electrically induced muscle contractions influence bone density decline after spinal cord injury. Spine. 2006a;31:548-553.
  • Shields RK, Dudley-Javoroski S. Musculoskeletal plasticity after acute spinal cord injury: effects of long-term neuromuscular electrical stimulation training. J Neurophysiol. 2006b;95:2380-2390.
  • Shields RK, Dudley-Javoroski S. Musculoskeletal adaptations in chronic spinal cord injury: Effects of long-term soleus electrical stimulation training. Neuralrehabil Neural Repair. 2007:21:169-179.
  • Thoumie P, Le Claire G, Beillot J, Dassonville J, Chevalier T, Perrouin-Verbe B, et al. Restoration of functional gait in paraplegic patients with the RGO-II hybrid orthosis. A multicenter controlled study. II: Physiological evaluation. Paraplegia 1995;33:654-659.
  • Vestergaard P, Krogh K, Rejnmark L, Mosekilde L. Fracture rates and risk factors for fractures in patients with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 1998;36:790-796.
  • Warden SJ, Bennell KL, Matthews B, Brown DJ, McMeeken JM, Wark JD. Efficacy of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound in the prevention of osteoporosis following spinal cord injury. Bone 2001;29:431-436.
  • Zehnder Y, Luthi M, Michel D, Knecht H, Perrelet R, Neto I, et al. Long-term changes in bone metabolism, bone mineral density, quantitative ultrasound parameters, and fracture incidence after spinal cord injury: a cross-sectional observational study in 100 paraplegic men. Osteoporos Int 2004;15:180-189.
  • Zehnder Y, Risi S, Michel D, Knecht H, Perrelet R, Kraenzlin M, et al. Prevention of bone loss in paraplegics over 2 years with alendronate. J Bone Miner Res 2004;19:1067-1074.

Bowel Management

Neurogenicbowel is a syndrome commonly observed in individuals with SCI and defined as colonic dysfunctions due to lack of central nervous control.  Bowel dysfunction following spinal cord injury (SCI) is a major source of morbidity (Han et al. 1998; Stone et al. 1990a).  Not surprisingly, bowel dysfunctions alone or bladder/bowel dysfunctions were rated among the highest priorities among individuals with SCI in numerous studies (Anderson 2004; Glickman and Kamm 1996;). Depending on the level of injury, a variety of GI problems could arise in these individuals and it has the potential to disrupt almost every aspect of their life. Correa and colleagues found that 27 – 41 % of patients with neurogenic bowel report chronic gastrointestinal GI problems that alter their lifestyle and may require treatment (Correa and Rotter 2000). Fear of bowel accidents is common among individuals with SCI and deters them from participating in social and other outside activities (Correa and Rotter 2000). Severe constipation often follows SCI and chronic constipation has a significant impact on quality of life (Longo et al. 1995). The prevalence of chronic GI symptoms increases with time after injury, suggesting that these problems are acquired and potentially preventable (Rajendran et al. 1992).

Decreased mobility (where constipation is more prevalent) and lack of sensation may partially contribute to GI dysfunction.  However, disrupted autonomic control of the GI tract is probably the dominating cause for major bowel dysfunctions observed in this population, leading to delayed gastric emptying (Leduc et al. 2002; Gondim et al. 2001;Menter 1997; Rajendran et al. 1992; Fealey et al. 1984), poor colonic motility (Lynch & Frizelle 2006; Fajardo et al.2003) resulting in prolonged bowel transit time (Brading & Ramalingam 2006; Lynch et al. 2001), constipation (Faaborg et al.2008; Finnerup et al. 2008;Lynch et al. 2000;), and postprandial (after eating a meal) abdominal distension (Stone et al. 1990a).  Furthermore, a significant number of bowel dysfunctions following SCI are associated with episodes of autonomic dysreflexia (Furusawa et al. 2007; Cosman and Vu 2005).

The level and severity of SCI are important factors to consider when deciding on bowel management strategies with the goal of re-establishing some level of evacuation control. Clinical experience indicates that a successful bowel program results in predictable, regular and thorough evacuation of the bowels without the occurrence of incontinence and additional complications (i.e. autonomic dysreflexia). An effective bowel program takes into consideration diet and nutritional factors, use of medications when necessary and is consistent with the neurologic condition and needs of the individual with SCI.It is important to emphasize that each person with SCI is unique and that individual bowel programs need to be client-specific. Clinical experience indicates that the procedures used and the need for medications will depend greatly on the level of neurologic injury, the extent of impairment and subsequent effect of the injury on bowel function. The effectiveness of a bowel program should be reevaluated and modified as needed.

Innervation of the gastrointestinal system

Figure 1: Innervation of the gastrointestinal system. Schematic diagram of the autonomic and somatic innervations of the lower GI tract and pelvic floor. The brainstem, spinal cord and sympathetic chain are shown on the left, and the colon, rectum and pelvic floor on the right. Sympathetic innervation (dashed lines) originates from the thoracic and upper lumbar regions; parasympathetic innervation (solid lines) orginates from the vagus nerve (to the upper GI and colon up to the colonic flexture) and from the sacral region of the spinal cord (to areas below the splenic flexture). Dotted lines represent the mixed nerves supplying the somatic innervation to the musculature of the external anal sphincter and the pelvic floor.

(Reprinted from Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 78(3), Steins SA, Biener Bergman S, Goetz LL, Neurogenic bowel dysfunction after spinal cord injury: clinical evaluation and rehabilitative management, S86-S102, Copyright (1997), with permission from Elsevier.)

Krassioukov A, Claxton G, Abramson C, Shum S (2010). Neurogenic Bowel Following Spinal Cord Injury. In: Eng JJ, Teasell RW, Miller WC, Wolfe DL, Townson AF, Hsieh JTC, Connolly SJ, Mehta S, Sakakibara BM, editors. Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Evidence. Version 3.0. Vancouver, p 1-41.

Spinal Cord Injury and its Impact on Bowel and Ano-rectal Function

Bowel function is a major physical and psychological problem for persons with spinal cord injury. Following a spinal cord injury, changes in bowel motility, sphincter control and gross motor dexterity interact to make bowel management a major life-limiting problem. In 2000, Lynch et al. surveyed 1200 persons with SCI and 1200 age and gender-matched controls to describe bowel function. For persons with SCI, their mean Fecal Incontinence Score (FIS) was significantly higher than controls. It was also noted that for persons with complete SCI, their mean FIS was significantly higher than those persons with incomplete SCI. Quality of life was affected by incontinence in 62% of SCI respondents compared with 8% of controls. Fecal urgency and time spent on bowel management were also significantly higher for persons with SCI. A significantly higher percentage (39%) of SCI respondents use laxatives compared to 4% of controls. The decreased ability to discriminate between gas and liquid for complete SCI patients also makes the chance for fecal incontinence more likely.

Depending on the level of injury, there are two distinct patterns in the clinical presentation of bowel dysfunction: injury above the conus medullaris results in upper motor neuron (UMN) bowel syndrome and injury at the conus medullaris and cauda equine results in lower motor neuron (LMN) bowel syndrome (Singal et al. 2006; Steins et al. 1997).

The UMN bowel syndrome, or hyperreflexic bowel, is characterized by increased colonic wall and anal tones. Voluntary (cortical) control of the external anal sphincter is disrupted and the sphincter remains tight, thereby promoting retention of stool. The nerve connections between the spinal cord and the colon, however, remain intact; therefore, there is preserved reflex coordination and stool propulsion. The UMN bowel syndrome is typically associated with constipation and fecal retention at least in part due to external anal sphincter activity (Steins et al. 1997).  Stool evacuation in these individuals occurs by means of reflex activity caused by a stimulus introduced into the rectum, such as an irritant suppository or digital stimulation.

LMN bowel syndrome, or areflexic bowel, is characterized by the loss of centrally-mediated (spinal cord) peristalsis and slow stool propulsion.  A segmental colonic peristalsis occurs only due to the activity of the intrinsic myenteric plexus, resulting in the production of drier and round- shaped stool. LMN bowel syndrome is commonly associated with constipation and a significant risk of incontinence due to the atonic external anal sphincter and lack of control over the levator ani muscle that causes the lumen of the rectum to open.

Completeness of injury also has a significant impact on bowel function in individuals with SCI.  Those with an incomplete injury may retain the sensation of rectal fullness and ability to evacuate bowels so no specific bowel program may be required.

Table 1: Clinical Presentations in Bowel Functions Following SCI (Singal et al. 2006)

Difficulties with bowel emptying are of concern to most persons with SCI. For the tetraplegic patient, loss of control over visceral function may be seen as more important than the ability to walk (Frost et al. 1993). Urinary problems in patients with SCI have been extensively studied, and with the advent of intermittent self-catheterization, electrical stimulation of the bladder and advances in diagnostic techniques, considerable improvements have been made in managing lower urinary tract and renal function. In contrast, the management of bowel disorders, and in particular, the intractable constipation that is so common in these patients, has remained essentially unchanged over the past two decades (MacDonagh et al. 1990).

Various researchers have shown that electrical stimulation of the somatic nervous system can bring about an alteration in visceral function in humans. Riedy et al. (2000) showed that short periods of electrical stimulation with perianal electrodes resulted in an increase in anal pressures. Bowel reflex centres within the sacral spinal cord may be released from descending inhibition after SCI and may be altered with somatic input (Frost et al. 1993). Electrical sacral root stimulation induces defecation in SCI patients and is currently under examination as a new therapy for fecal incontinence. In contrast to electrical stimulation, magnetic stimulation may produce similar results and is noninvasive (Morren et al. 2001). Morren et al. (2001) studied the effects of magnetic sacral root stimulation on anorectal pressure and volume in both fecal incontinence and SCI patients. Sun et al. (1995) investigated the role of spinal reflexes in anorectal function. Their subjects underwent anorectal manometry and electromyography, before and after having a sacral posterior rhizotomy performed by the same neurosurgeon. They found that all subjects lost conscious control of the external anal sphincter as well as  responses to intra-abdominal pressure and rectal distention. While the use of sacral root stimulation, either electrical or magnetic, seems to be producing positive results, further research is required.

Management

Few SCI patients feel normal desire to defecate and most use a variety of methods to initiate defecation, including laxatives, enemas, suppositories or digital stimulation of the rectum and anal canal. SCI results in severely prolonged colonic transit times both in the acute and chronic phase. However, the type of colorectal dysfunction depends on the level of SCI (Krogh et al. 2000; Stiens et al. 1997). Colorectal problems often restrict their participation in social activities and influence their quality of life. Krogh et al. (2000) and Nino-Murcia et al. (1990) measured colonic transit time in individuals using ingested radiopaque markers and abdominal radiographs taken at 24 hour intervals. They found that the mean transit time through the entire colon in SCI patients was significantly longer than normal adults. Future studies on colonic transit times and anorectal dynamics could aid in the approach used to manage bowel dysfunction in SCI patients. Difficulty with evacuation has been attributed to prolongation of the colonic transit time in individuals with SCI.

The Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine developed guidelines for neurogenic bowel management (Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine 1998). A comprehensive evaluation of bowel function, impairment, and possible problems is recommended at the onset of SCI and at least once annually.  The evaluation may include a patient history, physical exam, an assessment of the ability of the individual or his caregiver to perform procedures safely and effectively, as well as of the bowel program design, assistive techniques/devices used, and the patient’s diet. More recently, the Multidisciplinary Association of the Spinal Cord Injury Professionals (MASCIP 2009) in affiliation with the Spinal Cord Injury Centres of the United Kingdom and Ireland released guidelines for the management of neurogenic bowel. These guidelines provide standards for care for both those being admitted for rehabilitation and those living in the community.

Management of neurogenic bowel complications is reliant on the clinician to recognize common complications and their clinical presentation (Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine, 1998, MASCIP 2009). Common complications include constipation, fecal impaction and hemorrhoids. Recommended management protocols for constipation include the establishment of a balanced diet with adequate fluid and fibre intake, increased daily activity, and if possible, reduction or elimination of medication contributing to constipation. If these recommendations fail, prokinetic medication may be used to promote transit through the gastrointestinal tract.  The step-wise management recommended for fecal impaction is first manual evacuation, then if not successful, oral stimulants, and finally oil retention enemas. To minimize the development of hemorrhoids, oral agents (to maintain soft-formed stool), minimize straining during bowel efforts, and minimal physical trauma during anal stimulation are recommended. Once hemorrhoids have developed, topical anti-inflammatory creams or suppositories are suggested as early treatment. Overall, the Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine recommends further research in all bowel management areas (Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine, 1998).

Multifaceted Programs

There are several factors that may influence bowel function including diet, fluid consumption, and routine bowel evacuations. Multifaceted programs target more than one factor in an attempt to reduce colonic transit time as well as decrease the incidences of difficult evacuations.

Table 2: Multifaceted Bowel Management Programs

Discussion

Improving the movement of stool through the GI tract is the most important part of any bowel management protocol following SCI. An array of interventions, as components of a bowel routine, is recommended for the management of neurogenic bowel following SCI. These include dietary recommendations, anorectal/perianal stimulation, timing the performance of the bowel routine with food intake (thus taking advantage of gastro-colonic and recto-colonic reflexes), and a variety of pharmacological agents.  Unfortunately, only a limited number of studies evaluated the effects of different protocols on bowel function following SCI. From the results of three pre-post studies, it is apparent that response to the protocols is highly individualized.  However, Badiali et al.’s (1997) multifaceted bowel management program effectively reduced gastrointestinal transit time while Correa and Rotter’s (2000) program reduced the incidence of difficult intestinal evacuation. Coggrave et al. (2006) modified the bowel management program originally proposed by Badiali et al. (1997) by including an additional step of manual evacuation and found a significant decrease in the number of bowel movement episodes requiring laxatives (from 62.8% to 23.1%).  These authors also reported a significant decrease in the mean duration of bowel management episodes with the introduction of this protocol (Coggrave et al. 2006). As these three studies incorporated several factors into the bowel management programs including diet, fluid consumption, and routine bowel practice, it is not possible to determine the key factor. In using the same management program in their 2006 pre-post study (Coggrave et al. 2006), Coggrave et al. (2009a) more recently conducted a 6-week randomized controlled trial in which the management program was compared to the control group’s usual bowel careconsisting of each subject’s usual type, number and order of interventions to achieve evacuation. The authors wanted to examine whether systematic use of less invasive interventions (ie the first few steps in the management program:simulation of gastro-colic reflex 20 min before starting bowel care; abdominal massage; perianal digitation; anorectal digitation; and glycerin suppositories), could reduce the need for oral laxatives or more invasive interventions such as rectal stimulants and manual evacuations.Findings revealed that bowel care took longer in the intervention group, fecal incontinence was more frequent (p=0.04), and the need for oral laxatives and invasive interventions was not reduced (p=0.4). The findings in this RCT (Coggrave et al. 2009a) are in contrast with other published findings in which the use of a multifaceted program reduced the level of intervention needed for evacuation and duration of bowel management. (Coggrave et al. 2006, Badiali et al. 1997). The samples in the earlier studies, however, were younger and injured for a shorter period of time, which both are associated with less frequent use of medicated rectal stimulants, manual evacuation, and oral laxatives (Coggrave et al. 2009b).

Conclusion

  • There is level 1 evidence (from one RCT; N=68) (Coggrave et al. 2009) that systematic use of less invasive interventions do not reduce the need for oral laxatives and invasive interventions. There is also level 1 evidence (Coggrave et al. 2009 that use of multifaceted bowel management programs increase the duration of time required for bowel management. This is in contrast with  level 4 evidence (from three pre-post studies; aggregate N=65) (Coggrave et al. 2006; Correa and Rotter 2000; Badiali et al. 1997;) that multifaceted bowel management programs reduce gastrointestinal transit time, incidences of difficult evacuations, and duration of time required for bowel management.
  • There is limited evidence in support of multifaceted programs for managing a neurogenic bowel.

Dietary Fibre

It is well-known that fibre is an important part of any diet. There are different types of fibre, each benefiting the body in a different way. Soluble fibres mix with water in the intestine to form a gel-like substance, which acts as a trap to collect certain body wastes and then move them out of the body. Insoluble fibres absorb and hold water, producing uniform stool and helping to push content of the gut through the digestive system quickly. Insoluble fibres promote regularity and treat constipation.

The Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine (1998) recommends an initial diet with no less than 15 grams of fibre daily, and the MASCIP (2009) group identify an average intake of 18 grams, however, acknowledge that adjustments should be made if problems arise with stool consistency. The most common source of dietary fibre is bran.  It is not recommended to place individuals with SCI on high fibre diets (Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine, 1998

Table 3: Dietary fibre for managing neurogenic bowel after a spinal cord injury

Discussion

Results of this study suggest that increasing dietary fibre in SCI patients does not have the same effect on bowel function as has been previously demonstrated in individuals with normal-functioning bowels. The effect may actually be the opposite of the desired result (Cameron et al. 1996). Therefore, adding more fibre alone does not improve bowel function, however, more evidence is required to assess the effectiveness of adding fibre to diets.

Conclusion

  • There is level 4 evidence (from 1 case series; N=11) (Cameron et al. 1996) that indicates high fibre diets may lengthen colonic transit time.
  • There is a need for further research to examine the optimal level of dietary intake in spinal cord injured patients.

Reflex Stimulation of the GI Tract

Utilization of the preserved GI reflexes could be useful in bowel management following SCI.   For example, the gastro-colonic and ano-rectal reflexes could be successfully incorporated into a bowel routine for individuals with SCI.  It is well-known that following breakfast, a gastric distention could activate bowel motility and morning defecation (Sloots et al. 2003; Ford et al. 1995).  Furthermore, digital ano-rectal stimulation has been shown to be useful in bowel evacuation following spinal cord injury (Shafik et al. 2000).

Table 4: Reflex Stimulation of the GI Tract

Digital rectal stimulation increases peristaltic waves in the left colon, thus increasing motility in this segment (Korsten et al. 2007).

Conclusion

  • There is level 4 evidence (from 1 pre-post study; N=6) (Korsten et al. 2007) that digital rectal stimulation increases motility in the left colon.
  • Digital rectal stimulation increases motility in the left colon in individuals with SCI.

Electrical and Magnetic Stimulation

A significant number of electrical or magnetic stimulation methods have been proposed and tested for their ability to improve bowel function in SCI individuals.  These techniques are varied, from less expensive and non-invasive ones such as abdominal belt stimulation (Korsten et al. 2004) and superficial peripheral nerve stimulation (Mentes et al 2007), to more complex and invasive techniques including the Praxis FES system (implantation of epineural electrodes for skeletal muscle activation) (Davis et al. 2001) and the implantation of epidural or anterior sacral root electrodes (Kochourbos et al. 2000; Chia et al. 1996; Binnie et al. 1991; MacDonagh et al. 1990) More recently, magnetic stimulation techniques have also been also used.  This method, based on Faraday's Law, uses devices to generate a magnetic field in order to induce an electric field, which then generates sufficient current to stimulate the peripheral nerves (Lin et al. 2002). 

Table 5a: Functional Electrical or Magnetic Stimulation for of Skeletal Muscles

Table 5b: Implanted Electrical Stimulation Systems

Discussion

A variety of methods using electrical or magnetic stimulation devices have been tested to determine whether or not it improves colonic transit time in individuals with SCI. The use of functional magnetic stimulation decreased the mean colonic transit time (Tsai et al. 2009; Lin et al. 2002; Lin et al. 2001), as did stimulation of the abdominal muscles (Hascakova-Bartova et al. 2009; Korsten et al. 2004,). While preliminary results for posterior tibial nerve stimulation appear promising, it is important to note that the statistical significance of the improvements in clinical and physiological parameters were not reported and the study involved only two subjects (Mentes et al. 2007).

In terms of implanted electrical stimulation systems, Binnie et al. (1991) found that an implanted Brindley stimulator did not reduce oro-caecal time for individuals with SCI, however, subjects in the stimulator group did experience a significant increase in defecation compared to the SCI group (Binnie et al. 1991).

Subsequent studies using sacral nerve root stimulation yielded improvements in bowel function,  including better spontaneous evacuation (Chia et al. 1996), reduced bowel program times (Kachourbos and Creasey 2000, Valles et al. 2009, Lombardi et al. 2009), elimination of autonomic dysreflexia related to bowel management (Kachourbos and Creasey 2000), and increased quality of life (Lombardi et al. 2009, Holzer et al. 2007, Kachourbos and Creasey 2000) and elimination of manual help for defecation (Macdonagh et al. 1990). Both Holzer et al. (2007) and Jarrett et al. (2005) found reduced number of incontinence episodes through the use of sacral nerve stimulation, but conflicting evidence on the effects of resting and squeeze canal pressures (Holzer et al. 2007, Jarrett et al. 2005). Gstaltner et al. (2008) found an improved fecal continence, quality of life, and deliberate retention of feces in their study among individuals with cauda equine syndrome. Finally, the Praxis FES system increased the frequency of defecation and decreased the time required for bowel evacuation in one subject (Johnston et al. 2005).

Conclusions

  • There is level 1 evidence (from 1 RCT) (Korsten et al. 2004) that electrical stimulation of the abdominal wall muscles can improve bowel management for individuals with tetraplegia.
  • There is level 2 evidence (from 1 prospective controlled trial) (Binnie et al. 1991) that support the use of sacral anterior root stimulation to reduce severe constipation in complete injuries.
  • There is level 4 evidence (from 3 pre-post studies) (Tsai et al. 2009, Lin et al. 2001; 2002) that functional magnetic stimulation may reduce colonic transit time in individuals with SCI.
  • There is level 4 evidence (from 1 pre-post study with two subjects) (Mentes et al. 2007) that posterior tibial nerve stimulation improves bowel management for those with incomplete SCI.
  • There is level 4 evidence (from 1 pre-post study with two subjects) (Johnston et al. 2005) that the Praxis FES system increases the frequency of defecation and decreases time required for bowel care in individuals with SCI. 
  • Electrical stimulation of the abdominal wall muscles can improve bowel management for individuals with tetraplegia.
  • Functional magnetic stimulation may reduce colonic transit time in individuals with SCI.
  • Sacral anterior root stimulation reduces severe constipation in individuals with SCI.
  • More research is needed to warrant the use of the Praxis FES system for bowel management in individuals with SCI.
  • Posterior tibial nerve stimulation is a relatively new treatment for fecal incontinence and while preliminary results show promise, the sample size is limited and more research is needed to warrant the use of this new modality.

Irrigation Techniques

Persons with SCI require assistance with emptying their bowels regularly. Forms of assistance include the use of medications, suppositories, digital stimulation and/or mini-enemas. Clinical experience shows that despite their best efforts, some persons with SCI are unable to achieve an effective, regular bowel routine and thus, other methods may be explored. Pulse water irrigation is one such technique and consists of supplying intermittent, rapid pulses of warm water into the rectum to break up stool impactions and to stimulate peristalsis (Puet et al. 1997). Christensen et al. (2006) assessed the use of the newly developed Peristeen Anal Irrigation system (Coloplast A/S, Kokkedal, Denmark) for transanal irrigation. The system consists of a rectal balloon catheter, a manual pump, and a water container. The catheter is inserted into the rectum and the balloon inflated to hold the catheter in place while a tap water enema is administered with the manual pump (Christensen et al. 2006).

Table 6: Irrigation Techniques for Neurogenic Bowel After Spinal Cord Injury

Discussion

Pulsed irrigation evacuation is a safe and effective method for individuals with SCI who develop impactions or do not have an effective bowel routine (Puet et al. 1997). Compared to conservative bowel management practices outlined by the Paralyzed Veterans of America, transanal irrigation, through the use of the Peristeen Anal Irrigation System, reduces time spent on bowel management, dependency on others for help, and the frequency of defecation-related symptoms (i.e. abdominal pain, anorectal pain, chills, nausea, dizziness, pounding headache, sweating, facial flushing, general discomfort)  (Christensen et al. 2006). In addition, transanal irrigation appears to alleviate fecal incontinence and constipation more so than conservative bowel management (Christensen et al. 2006). Christensen et al. (2008) and Del Popolo et al. (2008) found similar results. Del Popolo et al. (2008) also found that 9 out of their 32 subjects either reduced or eliminated their use of pharmaceuticals. Finally, Christensen et al. (2000), found that the Enema Continence Catheter can be used to treat the neurogenic bowel with improved fecal incontinence and quality of life.

Conclusion

  • There is level 4 evidence (from 1 case series study) (Puet et al. 1997) that supports using pulsed water irrigation (intermittent rapid pulses) to remove stool in individuals with SCI.
  • There is level 1 evidence (from 1 RCT) (Christensen et al. 2006) that supports the use of transanal irrigation (Peristeen Anal Irrigation system) over conservative bowel treatment (as outlined by the Paralyzed Veterans of America clinical practical guidelines).
  • There is level 4 evidence (from 1 case series study, and one post-test) (Faaborg et al. 2008; Christensen et al. 2000) that supports the use of an Enema Continence Catheter to treat the neurogenic bowel.
  • Pulsed water irrigation may remove stool in individuals with SCI and transanal irrigation alleviates constipation and fecal incontinence. Often, more than one procedure is necessary for individuals that are unable to develop an effective bowel routine.

Use of Pharmacological Agents

Chronic constipation is a common problem after SCI, affecting up to 80% of such patients (Krogh et al. 2002). Prokinetic agents are presumed to promote transit through the GI tract, thereby decreasing the length of time needed for stool to pass through the intestines and increasing the amount of stool available for evacuation. Cisapride (the most commonly used), prucalopride, metoclopramide, neostigmine (administered both with and without glycopyrrolate), and fampridine are five examples presented in the following research. The presence of constipation in patients with SCI with slow transit times has been well-documented (Geders et al. 1995).Often, medication is considered the last resort, with its use reserved for persons with severe constipation and where modification of the bowel program has failed.

Table 7: Treatment studies using pharmacology for neurogenic bowel after SCI

Discussion

The efficacy of cisapride (a “prokinetic" agent with serotoninergic receptor agonist action) for treatment of the neurogenic bowel remains inconclusive. Longo et al. (1995) found subjective improvements in colonic and anorectal function, alleviation of symptoms, an increase in stool frequency, a decrease in the use of laxatives, and an increase in the ease of defecation. These findings are contradicted by an earlier study by De Both et al. (1992) in which the authors found no difference in the number of defecations per week between subjects in the cisapride and placebo groups, similar improvements in both groups in terms of ease of evacuation, and the use of digital stimulation or suppositories unaffected by both treatments. However, cisapride use does seem to improve transit times in persons with SCI. A significant reduction in colonic transit time, from 7.7 days to 5.1 days, was reported by Binnie et al. (1988) and a significant reduction in oro-caecal transit time was reported by De Both et al. (1992).  Geders et al. (1995) and Rajendran et al. (1992) found that cisapride improves transit times in subjects with tetraplegia with initial abnormal transit times. In conjunction with newer and more sophisticated techniques of colonic transit times measurement, further investigations of cisapride in those with SCI and symptomatic bowel dysfunction is warranted (Geders et al. 1995).

Segal et al. (1987) investigated the use of metoclopramide (a potent dopamine receptor antagonistwith prokineticproperties) for enhancing gastric emptying in persons with SCI. They found that impaired gastric emptying is correlated with decreased drug absorption. Since constipation in patients with both acute and chronic SCI is considered primarily a consequence of prolonged colonic transit time, stimulating intestinal motility would appear to be a reasonable therapeutic approach.  Improvement in constipation and increased frequency of bowel movement were also seen with the use of prucalopride - a novel, highly selective serotonin receptor agonist with enterokinetic properties that facilitate cholinergic and excitatory non-adrenergic, non-cholinergic neurotransmission (Krogh et al. 2002).  Korsten et al. (2005) found that neostigmine (a reversible cholinesterase inhibitor) or the combination of neostigmine and glycopyrrolate administered intravenously improved stool expulsion over normal saline. Rosman et al. (2008) reported similar findings for the use of neostigmine and glycopyrrolate in combination over placebo. Finally, a study by Cardenas et al. (2007) reported an increase in the number of days with bowel movements in approximately one-fifth of the subjects given sustained-release fampridine (selective potassium channel blocker).

Conclusion

  • Cisapride: There is level 1 evidence (from 3 RCTs) (De Both et al. 1992; Rajendran et al. 1992; Geders et al. 1995) that cisapride significantly reduces colonic transit time for chronic constipation.
  • Prucalopride: There is level 1 evidence (from 1 RCT) (Krogh et al. 2002) that prucalopride increases stool frequency, improves stool consistency and decreases gastrointestinal transit time.
  • Metoclopramide: There is level 2 evidence (from 1 prospective controlled trial; N=20) (Segal et al. 1987) that intravenous administration of metoclopramide corrects impairments in gastric emptying.
  • Neostigmine: There is level 1 evidence (from 1 RCT) (Korsten et al. 2005) that neostigmine, administered with or without glycopyrrolate, leads to a greater expulsion of stool.
  • There is level 1 evidence that neostigmine with glycopyrrolate decreases total bowel evacuation times and improves bowel evacuation.
  • Fampridine: There is level 1 evidence (from 1 RCT) (Cardenas et al. 2007) that fampridine can increase the number of days with bowel movements.
  • Cisapride, prucalopride, metoclopramide, neostigmine, and fampridine may be used for the treatment of chronic constipation in persons with SCI.
  • Cisapride and Prucalopride are not currently available in Canada or the United States due to adverse side effects. More research is required on these prokinetic agents prior to their regular use.

Use of Suppositories

More than 20% of persons with SCI report difficulty with evacuation of their bowels (House et al. 1997). The use of chemical rectal agents (suppositories) is a common and often necessary component of a successful bowel management program. Bisacodyl (dulcolax) and glycerin are the most common active ingredients in these suppositories. The glycerin suppository is a mild local stimulus and lubricating agent. Bisacodyl (dulcolax) is an irritant that acts directly on the colonic mucosa producing peristalsis throughout the colon. The most commonly used laxative suppositories contain 10 mg of bisacodyl powder distributed within a hydrogenated vegetable-oil base (HVB) (House et al. 1997).

Table 8: Treatment studies using suppositories for neurogenic bowel after SCI

Discussion

The effectiveness of the hydrogenated vegetable oil-based bisacodyl suppositories compared to the polyethylene glycol-based suppositories has been thoroughly examined. The total bowel care time with the polyethylene glycol-based suppository is significantly less (Stiens et al. 1998; Frisbie 1997; Dunn & Galka 1994). House and Stiens (1997) compared the effectiveness of hydrogenated vegetable-based, polyethylene glycol-based and docusate glycerin (mini-enema) in subjects with upper motor neuron (UMN) lesions. Results showed a significant decrease in bowel care time using the polyethylene glycol-based suppository and the mini-enema as compared with the hydrogenated vegetable oil-based suppositories. Chemical rectal agents (suppositories) are used commonly by persons with SCI to maintain or enhance a successful bowel management program.

Conclusion

  • There is level 1 evidence (from 1 RCT) (House and Stiens 1997) to support polyethylene glycol-based suppositories for bowel management. There is a clinically significant decrease in the amount of nursing time for persons requiring assistance and less time performing bowel care for the independent individual.
  • Polyethylene glycol-based suppositories (10 mg. bisacodyl) are effective in maintaining or enhancing a successful bowel management program, especially for persons with an upper motor neuron SCI.

Colostomy

Bowel dysfunction is perceived as one of the most disabling aspects of SCI, causing great anxiety and being a source of emotional upset. Of all the medical problems experienced by persons with SCI, many rate the loss or change in bowel habit as one of the most significant factors affecting their quality of life. A colostomy is the surgical formation of an artificial anus by connecting the colon to an opening in the abdominal wall. SCI patients who receive elective colostomy usually have exhausted all other medical treatments available to them for bowel management.  Colostomy is an option when the extent of bowel dysfunction becomes severe and other non-surgical methods have failed to produce the desired result.  Colostomy is also frequently advocated as an adjunct to the treatment of perineal pressure ulcers in SCI patients. However, colostomy following SCI is not routinely used and is seen by many as the failure of rehabilitation services. There is no general consensus as to when colostomy should be performed in patients with SCI because there has been no way to capture the GI problems that often necessitate colostomy. 

Table 9: Colostomy after a spinal cord injury

Discussion

Colostomy is a safe, effective and well-accepted method of managing severe and chronic GI problems in persons with SCI. As research shows, colostomy reliably reduces the number of hours spent on bowel care (Munck et al. 2008; Branagan et al. 2003; Rosito et al. 2002; Kelly et al. 1999; Stone et al. 1990; Frisbie et al. 1986), reduces the number of hospitalizations caused by GI problems (Rosito et al. 2002) and bowel care-related complaints (Frisbie et al. 1986), simplifies bowel care routine (Frisbie et al. 1986), and improves quality of life (Munck et al. 2008Safadi et al. 2003; Rosito et al. 2002;Kelly et al. 1999). Colostomy increases independence, facilitates travel, elevates feelings of self-efficacy, and does not negatively affect body image (Branagan et al. 2003; Rosito et al. 2002). Colostomy was well-received by patients and either met or exceeded their expectations (Rosito et al. 2002). Most wished to have the colostomy done earlier (Branagan et al. 2003). The evolution of health care will require physicians to evaluate more critically the impact of surgical interventions, including colostomy, on the patient’s well-being.

Conclusions

  • Colostomy is a safe and effective treatment for severe, chronic gastrointestinal problems and perianal pressure ulcers in persons with SCI, and greatly improves their quality of life.

The Malone Antegrade Continence Enema and the Enema Continence Catheter

The Malone Antegrade Continence Enema (MACE) is an approach using a surgically-created entry into the large intestine to irrigate the intestine. The procedure consists of re-implanting the appendix into the cecum and bringing the other end to the abdominal wall, thus forming an appendicostomy (Malone et al. 1990). Consequently, a catheter can be introduced to the patient through the stoma and an enema administered (Christensen et al. 2000). Due to the wash-out effect and perhaps the stimulated colonic peristaltic, the colon and rectum will empty, thus preventing fecal incontinence and constipation (Christensen et al. 2000).

Table 10: The MACE and Enema Continence Catheter

Discussion

In persons with SCI for whom conservative bowel management measures prove ineffective, the MACE eliminates fecal incontinence (Worsoe et al. 2008; Teichman et al. 2003; Christensen et al. 2000; Teichman et al. 1998), reduces time spent on bowel care (Worsoe et al. 2008; Teichman et al. 2003; Teichman et al. 1998), improves quality of life (Teichman et al. 2003; Christensen et al. 2000), resolves autonomic dysreflexia secondary to the neurogenic bowel (Teichman et al. 1998), and successfully treats constipation (Christensen et al. 2000; Teichman et al. 2000). 

Christensen et al. (2000) compared the efficacy of MACE with the Enema Continence Catheter (ECE). The ECE, a specially designed catheter with an inflatable balloon, was originally developed by Shandling & Gilmour (1987) for bowel management in individuals with spina bifida. The catheter is inserted into the rectum and the balloon inflated to hold the catheter in place. When the enema is administered in the bowel, the balloon is deflated, the catheter removed and the bowel contents emptied (Christensen et al. 2000). Christensen et al. (2000) reported successful treatment of fecal incontinence, slow transit or constipation, and obstructed defecation in persons with SCI. The authors recommend that if the ECC fails, the MACE is a suitable alternative to more extensive procedures.

Conclusion

  • The Malone Antegrade Continence Enema is a safe and effective treatment for severe, chronic gastrointestinal problems in persons with SCI when conservative bowel management options are unsuccessful.

Assistive Devices

In addition to standard bowel protocols and pharmacological modalities, numerous devices were evaluated as means to improve bowel evacuation in individuals with SCI. These include a standing table and a modified toilet seat.

Table 11: Assistive Devices

Discussion

Hoenig et al. (2001) reported the case of an individual with SCI who, through the use of a standing table, doubled the frequency of his bowel movements and reduced time spent on bowel care. Uchikawa et al. (2007) developed a new procedure to induce bowel movements using a toilet set equipped with an electronic bidet that provides water flow to the anorectal area. A CCD camera and light are included to facilitate location of the anorectal area. The authors report that a reduction in the time needed for bowel management, with an increase of 40% (n=8) of subjects who can complete defecation in less than 30 minutes. 

Conclusion

  • There is level 5 evidence (from 1 case report with one subject) (Hoenig et al. 2001) that a standing table alleviates constipation in individuals with SCI.
  • There is level 4 evidence (from 1 post-test study) (Uchikawa et al. 2007) that a newly developed washing toilet seat with a CCD camera monitor for visual feedback reduces time spent on bowel care.
  • There is limited evidence that a standing table may reduce constipation.
  • There is limited evidence that a washing toilet seat with visual feedback may assist bowel

Abdominal Massage

Table 12: Abdominal Massage

Discussion

Patients received at least 15 minutes of abdominal massage which began at the cecum and extended along to the length of the colon to the rectum (Ayas et al. 2006). Differences were found in the frequency of defecation and mean CTT between phase I, when subjects partook in a standard bowel program in which they received a standard diet containing 15-20 g of fiber/day and underwent daily digital stimulation, and phase II, when the subjects continued to receive this standard care and abdominal massages. However, these differences were statistically insignificant (Ayas et al. 2006).

Conclusion

  • There is level 4 evidence (from 1 pre-post study; N=24) (Ayas et al. 2006) that the abdominal massage is ineffective for treating the neurogenic bowel.
  • Abdominal massage appears to be ineffective for treating neurogenic bowel.

Summary

Gastrointestinal (GI) complications are frequent following a SCI and their daily challenges can severely affect the quality of life of an individual.  In addition, GI complications can lead to visits to physicians, re-hospitalizations, and even death.  The evidence suggests that a multi-faceted approach to bowel management is effective and includes consideration of diet, medications, fluid intake, and evacuation schedules.  When severe constipation persists and a bowel program cannot be attained, surgical options such as a colostomy or implanted stimulator may be considered.

  • There is level 1 evidence (from one RCT; N=68) (Coggrave et al. 2009) that systematic use of less invasive interventions do not reduce the need for oral laxatives and invasive interventions. There is also level 1 evidence (Coggrave et al. 2009 that use of multifaceted bowel management programs increase the duration of time required for bowel management. This is in contrast with  level 4 evidence (from three pre-post studies; aggregate N=65) (Coggrave et al. 2006; Correa and Rotter 2000; Badiali et al. 1997;) that multifaceted bowel management programs reduce gastrointestinal transit time, incidences of difficult evacuations, and duration of time required for bowel management.
  • There is level 4 evidence (from 1 case series; N=11) (Cameron et al. 1996) that indicates high fibre diets may lengthen colonic transit time.
  • There is level 4 evidence (from 1 pre-post study; N=6) (Korsten et al. 2007) that digital rectal stimulation increases motility in the left colon.
  • There is level 1 evidence (from 1 RCT) (Korsten et al. 2004) that electrical stimulation of the abdominal wall muscles can improve bowel management for individuals with tetraplegia.
  • There is level 2 evidence (from 1 prospective controlled trial) (Binnie et al. 1991) that support the use of sacral anterior root stimulation to reduce severe constipation in complete injuries.
  • There is level 4 evidence (from 3 pre-post studies) (Tsai et al. 2009, Lin et al. 2001; 2002) that functional magnetic stimulation may reduce colonic transit time in individuals with SCI.
  • There is level 4 evidence (from 1 pre-post study with two subjects) (Mentes et al. 2007) that posterior tibial nerve stimulation improves bowel management for those with incomplete SCI.
  • There is level 4 evidence (from 1 pre-post study with two subjects) (Johnston et al. 2005) that the Praxis FES system increases the frequency of defecation and decreases time required for bowel care in individuals with SCI.
  • There is level 4 evidence (from 1 case series study) (Puet et al. 1997) that supports using pulsed water irrigation (intermittent rapid pulses) to remove stool in individuals with SCI.
  • There is level 1 evidence (from 1 RCT) (Christensen et al. 2006) that supports the use of transanal irrigation (Peristeen Anal Irrigation system) over conservative bowel treatment (as outlined by the Paralyzed Veterans of America clinical practical guidelines).
  • There is level 4 evidence (from 1 case series study, and one post-test) (Faaborg et al. 2008; Christensen et al. 2000) that supports the use of an Enema Continence Catheter to treat the neurogenic bowel.
  • Cisapride: There is level 1 evidence (from 3 RCTs) (De Both et al. 1992; Rajendran et al. 1992; Geders et al. 1995) that cisapride significantly reduces colonic transit time for chronic constipation.
  • Prucalopride: There is level 1 evidence (from 1 RCT) (Krogh et al. 2002) that prucalopride increases stool frequency, improves stool consistency and decreases gastrointestinal transit time.
  • Metoclopramide: There is level 2 evidence (from 1 prospective controlled trial; N=20) (Segal et al. 1987) that intravenous administration of metoclopramide corrects impairments in gastric emptying.
  • Neostigmine: There is level 1 evidence (from 1 RCT) (Korsten et al. 2005) that neostigmine, administered with or without glycopyrrolate, leads to a greater expulsion of stool.
  • There is level 1 evidence that neostigmine with glycopyrrolate decreases total bowel evacuation times and improves bowel evacuation.
  • Fampridine: There is level 1 evidence (from 1 RCT) (Cardenas et al. 2007) that fampridine can increase the number of days with bowel movements.
  • There is level 1 evidence (from 1 RCT) (House and Stiens 1997) to support polyethylene glycol-based suppositories for bowel management. There is a clinically significant decrease in the amount of nursing time for persons requiring assistance and less time performing bowel care for the independent individual.
  • There is level 4 evidence (from six studies) (Frisbie et al. 1986; Stone et al. 1990; Kelly et al. 1999; Rosito et al. 2002; Branagan et al. 2003, Munck et al. 2008) that colostomy reduces the number of hours spent on bowel care.
  • There is level 4 evidence (from 1 retrospective pre-post study) (Frisbie et al. 1986) that colostomy greatly simplifies bowel care routines.
  • There is level 4 evidence (from 1 case study) (Rosito et al. 2002) that colostomy reduces the number of hospitalizations caused by gastrointestinal problems and improves physical health, psychosocial adjustment and self-efficacy areas within quality of life.
  • There is level 4 evidence (from 4 retrospective reviews) (Teichman et al. 1998; Christensen et al. 2000; Teichman et al. 2003, Worsoe et al. 2008) that the Malone Antegrade Continence Enema successfully treats the neurogenic bowel.
  • There is level 4 evidence (from 1 retrospective review) (Christensen et al. 2000) that the Enema Continence Catheter can be used to treat the neurogenic bowel.  
  • There is level 5 evidence (from 1 case report with one subject) (Hoenig et al. 2001) that a standing table alleviates constipation in individuals with SCI.
  • There is level 4 evidence (from 1 post-test study) (Uchikawa et al. 2007) that a newly developed washing toilet seat with a CCD camera monitor for visual feedback reduces time spent on bowel care.
  • There is level 4 evidence (from 1 pre-post study; N=24) (Ayas et al. 2006) that the abdominal massage is ineffective for treating the neurogenic bowel.

Key Points

  • There is limited evidence that supports a multifaceted program for managing a neurogenic bowel.
  • There is a need for further research to examine the optimal level of dietary intake in spinal cord injured patients.
  • Digital rectal stimulation increases motility in the left colon in individuals with SCI.
  • Electrical stimulation of the abdominal wall muscles can improve bowel management for individuals with tetraplegia.
  • Functional magnetic stimulation may reduce colonic transit time in individuals with SCI.
  • Sacral anterior root stimulation reduces severe constipation in individuals with SCI.
  • More research is needed to warrant the use of the Praxis FES system for bowel management in individuals with SCI.
  • Posterior tibial nerve stimulation is a relatively new treatment for fecal incontinence and while preliminary results show promise, the sample size is limited and more research is needed to warrant this new modality.
  • Pulsed water irrigation may remove stool in individuals with SCI and transanal irrigation alleviates constipation and fecal incontinence. Often, more than one procedure is necessary for individuals that are unable to develop an effective bowel routine.
  • Cisapride, prucalopride, metoclopramide, neostigmine, and fampridine may be used for the treatment of chronic constipation in persons with SCI.
  • Cisapride and Prucalopride are not currently available in Canada or the United States due to adverse side effects. More research is required on these prokinetic agents prior to their regular use.
  • Polyethylene glycol-based suppositories (10 mg. bisacodyl) are effective in maintaining or enhancing a successful bowel management program, especially for persons with an upper motor neuron SCI.
  • Colostomy is a safe and effective treatment for severe, chronic gastrointestinal problems and perianal pressure ulcers in persons with SCI, and greatly improves their quality of life.
  • The Malone Antegrade Continence Enema is a safe and effective treatment for severe, chronic gastrointestinal problems in persons with SCI when conservative bowel management options are unsuccessful.
  • There is limited evidence that the use of a standing table and a washing toilet seat improves bowel function in individuals with SCI. 
  • There is limited evidence that a washing toilet seat with visual feedback may assist bowel care.
  • The abdominal massage appears to be ineffective for treatment of the neurogenic bowel.

References

  • Amir I, Sharma R, Bauman WA, Korsten MA. Bowel care for individuals with spinal cord injury: comparison of four approaches. J Spinal Cord Med 1998;21:21-24.
  • Anderson KD. Targeting recovery: Priorities of the spinal cord-injured population. Journal of Neurotrauma 2004;21(10):1371-1383.
  • Ayas S, Leblebici B, Sozay S, Bayramoglu M, Niron EA. The effect of abdominal massage on bowel function in patients with spinal cord injury. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2006;85:951-955.
  • Badiali D, Bracci F, Castellano V, Corazziari E, Fuoco U, Habib FI, Scivoletto G. Sequential treatment of chronic constipation in paraplegic subjects. Spinal Cord 1997;35:116-120.
  • Binnie NR, Smith AN, Creasey GH, Edmond P. Constipation associated with chronic spinal cord injury: the effect of pelvic parasympathetic stimulation by the Brindley stimulator. Paraplegia 1991;29:463-469.
  • Binnie NR, Creasey GH, Edmond P, Smith AN. The action of cisapride on the chronic constipation of paraplegia. Paraplegia 1988;26:151-158.
  • Brading AF, Ramalingam T. Mechanisms controlling normal defecation and the potential effects of spinal cord injury. Prog Brain Res 2006;152:345-58.
  • Branagan G, Tromans A, Finnis D. Effect of stoma formation on bowel care and quality of life in patients with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2003;41:680-683.
  • Cameron KJ, Nyulasi IB, Collier GR, Brown DJ. Assessment of the effect of increased dietary fibre intake on bowel function in patients with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 1996;34:277-283.
  • Cardenas DD, Ditunno J, Graziani V, Jackson AB, Lammertse D, Potter P, Sipski M, Cohen R, Blight AR. Phase 2 trial of sustained-release fampridine in chronic spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2007;45:158-168.
  • Chia YW, Lee TKY, Kour NW, Tung KH, Tan ES. Microchip implants on the anterior sacral roots in patients with spinal trauma: Does it improve bowel function? Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39:690-694.
  • Christensen P, Bazzocchi G, Coggrave M, Abel R, Hulting C, Krogh K, Media S, Laurberg S. A randomized, controlled trial of transanal irrigation versus conservative bowel management in spinal cord-injured patients. Gastroenterology 2006;131:738-747.
  • Christensen P, Bazzocchi G, Coggrave M, Abel R, Hulting C, Krogh K, Media S, Laurberg S. Outcome of transanal irrigation for bowel dysfunction in patients with spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med 2008;31:560-567.
  • Christensen P, Kvitzau B, Krogh K, Buntzen S, Laurberg S. Neurogenic colorectal dysfunction – use of new antegrade and retrograde wash-out methods. Spinal Cord 2000;38:255-261.
  • Coggrave MJ, Norton C. The need for manual evacuation and oral laxatives in the management of neurogenic bowel dysfunction after spinal cord injury: a randomized controlled trial of a stepwise protocol. Spinal Cord 2009a; epub ahead of print.
  • Coggrave MJ, Norton C, Wilson-Barnett J. Management of neurogenic bowel dysfunction in the community after spinal cord injury: a postal survey in the United Kingdom. Spinal Cord 2009b; 47: 323-330.
  • Coggrave M, Wiesel PH, Norton C. Management of fecal incontinence and constipation in adults with central neurological diseases. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2008.
  • Coggrave M, Burrows D, Durand MA. Progressive protocol in the bowel management of spinal cord injuries. British Journal of Nursing 2006;15(20):1108-1113.
  • Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine. Neurogenic bowel management in adults with spinal cord injury. In Clinical practice guidelines. Paralyzed Veterans of America; 1998.
  • Correa GI, Rotter KP. Clinical evaluation and management of neurogenic bowel after spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2000;38:301-308.
  • Cosman BC, Vu TT. Lidocaine anal block limits autonomic dysreflexia during anorectal
  • procedures in spinal cord injury: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Dis
  • Colon Rectum 2005;48:1556-1561.
  • Davis R, Patrick J, Barriskill A. Development of functional electrical stimulators utilizing cochlear implant technology. Med Eng Phys 2001;23:61-68.
  • De Both PSM, de Groot GH, Slootman HR. Effects of cisapride on constipation in paraplegic patients: a placebo-controlled randomized double-blind cross-over study. European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology 1992;4:1013-1017.
  • Del Popolo G, Mosiello G, Pilati C, Lamartina M, Battaglino F, Buffa P, Redaelli T, Lamberti G, Menarini M, Di Benedetto P, De Gennaro M. Treatment of neurogenic bowel dysfunction using transanal irrigation: a multicenter Italian study. Spinal Cord 2008;46:517-522.
  • Dunn KL, Galka ML. A comparison of the effectiveness of Therevac SB and bisacodyl suppositories in SCI patients' bowel programs. Rehabil.Nurs 1994;19:334-338.
  • Faaborg PM, Christensen P, Finnerup N, Laurberg S, Krogh K. The pattern of colorectal dysfunction changes with time since spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2008;46(3):234-238.
  • Faaborg PM, Christensen P, Kvitsau B, Buntzen S, Laurberg S, Krogh K. Long-term outcome and safety of transanal colonic irrigation for neurogenic bowel dysfunction. Spinal Cord 2008;47:545-549.
  • Fajardo NR, Pasiliao RV, Modeste-Duncan R, Creasey G, Bauman WA, Korsten MA. Decreased colonic motility in persons with chronic spinal cord injury. Am J Gastroenterol 2003;98(1):128-34.
  • Fealey RD, Szurszewski JH, Merrit JL, DiMagno EP. Effect of traumatic spinal cord transection on human upper gastrointestinal motility and gastric emptying. Gastroenterology 1984;87(1):69-75.
  • Finnerup NB, Faaborg P, Krogh K, Jensen TS. Abdominal pain in long-term spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2008;46(3):198-203.
  • Ford MJ, Camilleri MJ, Hanson RB, Wiste JA, Joyner MJ. Hyperventilation, central autonomic control, and colonic tone in humans. Gut 1995;37:499-504.
  • Frisbie JH, Tun CG, Nguyen CH. Effect of enterostomy on quality of life in spinal cord injury patients. J Am Paraplegia Soc 1986;9:3-5.
  • Frisbie JH. Improved bowel care with a polyethylene glycol based bisacadyl suppository. J Spinal Cord Med 1997;20:227-229.
  • Frost F, Hartwig D, Jaeger R, Leffler E, Wu Y. Electrical stimulation of the sacral dermatomes in spinal cord injury: effect on rectal manometry and bowel emptying. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993;74:696-701.
  • Furusawa K, Sugiyama H, Ikeda A, Tokuhiro A, Koyoshi, H, Takahashi M, Tajima F. Autonomic dysreflexia during a bowel program in patients with cervical spinal cord injury. Acta Med Okayama 2007;61(4):211-227.
  • Geders JM, Gaing A, Bauman WA, Korsten MA. The effect of cisapride on segmental colonic transit time in patients with spinal cord injury. Am.J.Gastroenterol 1995;90:285-289.
  • Glick ME, Meshkinpour H, Haldeman S, Hoehler F, Downey N, Bradley WE. Colonic dysfunction in patients with thoracic spinal cord injury. Gastroenterology 1984;86:287-294.
  • Glickman S, Kamm MA. Bowel dysfunction in spinal-cord-injury patients. Lancet 1996;347(9016):1651-3.
  • Gondim FA, Rodrigues CL, da Graça JR, Camurça FD, de Alencar HM, dos Santos AA, Rola FH. Neural mechanisms involved in the delay of gastric emptying and gastrointestinal transit of liquid after thoracic spinal cord transection in awake rats. Auton Neurosci. 2001;87(1):52-8.
  • Gstaltner K, Rosen H, Hufgard J, Märk R, Schrei K. Sacral nerve stimulation as an option for the treatment of faecal incontinence in patients suffering from cauda equina syndrome. Spinal Cord 2008;46:644-647.
  • Han TR, Kim JH, Kwon BS. Chronic gastrointestinal problems and bowel dysfunction in patients with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 1998;36(7):485-490).
  • Hascakova-Bartova R, Dinant J-F, Parent A, Ventura M. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation of completely paralyzed abdominal muscles in spinal cord-injured patients: a pilot study. Spinal Cord 2008;46:445-450.
  • Heart Health. The complete healthy shopping check list [pamphlet]. Heart Health. Becel and Heart and Stroke Foundation.
  • Hoenig H, Murphy T, Galbraith J, Zolkewitz M. Case study to evaluate a standing table for managing constipation. SCI Nursing 2001;18(2):74-7.
  • Holzer B, Rosen HR, Novi G, Ausch C, Nolbling N, Schiessel. Sacral nerve stimulation for neurogenic faecal incontinence. British Journal of Surgery 2007; 94: 749-753.
  • House JG, Stiens SA. Pharmacologically initiated defecation for persons with spinal cord injury: effectiveness of three agents. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997;78:1062-1065.
  • Jarrett MED, Matzel KE, Christiansen J, Baeten CGMI, Rosen H, Bittorf B, Stosser M, Madoff R, Kamm MA.Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence in patients with previous partial spinal injury including disc prolapse. British Journal of Surgery 2005; 92: 734-739.
  • Johnston TE, Betz RR, Smith BT, Benda BJ, Mulcahey MJ, Davis R, Houdayer TP, Pontari MA, Barriskill A, Creasey GH. Implantable FES system for upright mobility and bladder and bowel function for individuals with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2005;43:713-723.
  • Kachourbos MJ, Creasey GH. Health promotion in motion: Improving quality of life for persons with neurogenic bladder and bowel using assistive technology. SCI Nursing 1986;17(3):125-129.
  • Kelly SR, Shashidharan M, Borwell B, Tromans AM, Finnis D, Grundy DJ. The role of intestinal stoma in patients with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 1999;37:211-214.
  • Keshavarzian A, Barnes WE, Bruninga K, Nemchausky B, Mermall H, Bushnell D. Delayed colonic transit in spinal cord-injured patients measured by indium-111 Amberlite scintigraphy. Am J Gastroenterol 1995;90:1295-1300.
  • Korsten MA, Fajardo NR, Rosman AS, Creasey GH, Spungen AM, Bauman WA. Difficulty with evacuation after spinal cord injury: Colonic motility during sleep and effects of abdominal wall stimulation. JRRD 2004;41:95-99.
  • Korsten MA, Rosman AS, Ng A, Cavusoglu E, Spungen AM, Radulovic M, Wecht J, Bauman WA. Infusion of neostigmine-glycopyrrolate for bowel evacuation in persons with spinal cord injury. Am J Gastroenterol 2005;100:1560-1565.
  • Korsten M, Singal AK, Monga A, Chaparala G, Khan AM, Palmon R, Mendoza JRD, Lirio JP, Rosman AS, Spungen A, Bauman WA. Anorectal stimulation causes increased colonic motor activity in subjects with spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med 2007;30:31-35. 
  • Krogh K, Jensen MB, Gandrup P, Laurberg S, Nilsson J, Kerstens R, De Pauw M. Efficacy and tolerability of prucalopride in patients with constipation due to spinal cord injury. Scand J Gastroenterol 2002;37:431-436.
  • Krogh K, Mosdal C, Laurberg S. Gastrointestinal and segmental colonic transit times in patients with acute and chronic spinal cord lesions. Spinal Cord 2000;38:615-621.
  • Lin VW, Kim KH, Hsiao I,  Brown W. Functional magnetic stimulation facilitates gastric emptying. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:806-810.
  • Lin VW, Nino-Murcia M, Frost F, Wolfe V, Hsiao I, Perkash I. Functional magnetic stimulation of the colon in persons with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82:167-173.
  • Leduc BE, Spacek E, Lepage Y. Colonic transit time after spinal cord injury: any clinical significance? J Spinal Cord Med 2002;25(3):161-6.
  • Lombardi G, Del Popolo G, Cecconi F, Surrenti E, Macchiarella A. Clinical outcome of sacral neuromodulation in incomplete spinal-cord injured patients suffering from neurogenic bowel dysfunctions. Spinal Cord 2009; 48(2): 154-159.
  • Longo WE, Woolsey RM, Vernava AM, Virgo KS, McKirgan L, Johnson FE. Cisapride for constipation in spinal cord injured patients: a preliminary report. J Spinal Cord Med 1995;18:240-244.
  • Luther SL, Nelson AL, Harrow JJ, Chen F, Goetz LL. A comparison of patient outcomes and quality of life in persons with neurogenic bowel: standard bowel care program vs colostomy. J Spinal Cord Med 2005;28:387-393.
  • Lynch AC, Antony A, Dobbs BR, Frizelle FA. Bowel dysfunction following spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2001;39(4):193-203.
  • Lynch AC, Frizelle FA. Colorectal motility and defecation after spinal cord injury in humans. Prog Brain Res 2006;152:335-43.
  • Lynch AC, Wong C, Anthony A, Dobbs BR, Frizelle FA. Bowel dysfunction following spinal cord injury: a description of bowel function in a spinal cord-injured population and comparison with age and gender matched controls. Spinal Cord 2000;38:717-723.
  • MacDonagh RP, Sun WM, Smallwood R, Forster D, Read NW. Control of defecation in patients with spinal injuries by stimulation of sacral anterior nerve roots. BMJ 1990;300:1494-1497.
  • Malone, PS, Ransley PG, Kiely EM. Preliminary report: The antegrade continence enema. The Lancet 1990;336:1217-1218.
  • Menardo G, Bausano G, Corazziari E, Fazio A, Marangi A, Genta V, Marenco G. Large-bowel transit in paraplegic patients. Dis Colon Rectum 1987;30:924-928.
  • Menter R, Weitzenkamp D, Cooper D, Bingley J, Charlifue S, Whiteneck G. Bowel management outcomes in individuals with long-term spinal cord injuries. Spinal Cord 1997;35(9):608-612.
  • Mentes BB, Yuksel O, Aydin A, Tezcaner T, Leventoglu A, Aytac B. Posterior tibial nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence after partial spinal injury: preliminary report. Tech Coloproctol 2007;11:115-119.
  • Meshkinpour H, Nowroozi F, Glick ME. Colonic compliance in patients with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1983;64:111-112.
  • Morren GL, Walter S, Hallbook O, Sjodahl R. Effects of magnetic sacral root stimulation on anorectal pressure and volume. Dis Colon Rectum 2001;44:1827-1833.
  • Munck J, Simoens Ch, Thill V, Smets D, Debergh N, Fievet F, Mendes da Costa P. Intestinal stoma in patients with spinal cord injury: a retrospective study of 23 patients. Hepatogastroenterology 2008;55:2125-2129.
  • Nino-Murcia M, Stone JM, Chang PJ, Perkash I. Colonic transit in spinal cord-injured patients. Invest Radiol 1990;25:109-112.
  • Posser M. The sacral LION procedure for recovery of bladder/rectum/sexual functions in paraplegic patients after explantation of a previous Finetech-Brindley controller. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2009;16:98-101.
  • Puet TA, Jackson H, Amy S. Use of pulsed irrigation evacuation in the management of the neuropathic bowel. Spinal Cord 1997;35:694-699.
  • Rajendran SK, Reiser JR, Bauman W, Zhang RL, Gordon SK, Korsten MA. Gastrointestinal transit after spinal cord injury: effect of cisapride. Am J Gastroenterol 1992;87:1614-1617.
  • Randell N, Lynch AC, Anthony A, Dobbs BR, Roake JA, Frizelle FA. Does a colostomy alter quality of life in patients with spinal cord injury? A controlled study. Spinal Cord 2001;39:279-282.
  • Riedy LW, Chintam R, Walter JS. Use of neuromuscular stimulator to increase anal sphincter pressure. Spinal Cord 2000;38:724-727.
  • Rosito O, Nino-Murcia M, Wolfe VA, Kiratli BJ, Perkash I. The effects of colostomy on the quality of life in patients with spinal cord injury: a retrospective analysis. J Spinal Cord Med 2002;25:174-183.
  • Rosman AS, Chaparala G, Monga A, Spungen AM, Bauman WA, Korsten MA. Intramuscular neostigmine and glycopyrrolate safely accelerated bowel evacuation in patients with spinal cord injury and defecatory disorders. Dig Dis Sci 2008;53:2170-2173.
  • Safadi BY, Rosito O, Nino-Murcia M, Wolfe VA, Perkash I. Which stoma works better for colonic dysmotility in the spinal cord injured patient? Am J Surg 2003;186:437-442.
  • Segal JL, Milne N, Brunnemann SR, Lyons KP. Metoclopramide-induced normalization of impaired gastric emptying in spinal cord injury. Am J Gastroenterol 1987;82:1143-1148.
  • Shafik A, El-Sibai O, Shafik IA. Physiologic basis of digital-rectal stimulation for bowel evacuation in patients with spinal cord injury: identification of an anorectal excitatory reflex. J Spinal Cord Med. 2000;23(4):270-5.
  • Singal AK, Rosman AS, Bauman WA, Korsten MA. Recent concepts in the management of bowel probles after spinal cord injury. Adv Med Sci 2006;51:15-22.
  • Sloots CE, Felt-Bersma RJ, Meuwissen SG, Kuipers EJ. Influence of gender, parity, and caloric load on gastrorectal response in healthy subjects: a barstat study. Dig Dis Sci 2003;48:516-521.
  • Spinal Cord Injury Centres of the United Kingdom and Ireland. Guidelines for management of neurogenic bowel dysfunction after spinal cord injury. Multidisciplinary Association of Spinal Cord Injury Professionals; 2009.
  • Stiens SA, Bergman SB, Goetz LL. Neurogenic bowel dysfunction after spinal cord injury: clinical evaluation and rehabilitative management. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997;78:S86-S102.
  • Stiens SA, Luttrel W, Binard JE. Polyethylene glycol versus vegetable oil based bisacodyl suppositories to initiate side-lying bowel care: A clinical trial in persons with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 1998;36:777-781.
  • Stone JM, Nino-Marcia M, Wolfe VA, Perkash I. Chronic gastrointestinal problems in spinal cord injury patients: a prospective analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 1990a;85:1114-9.
  • Stone JM, Wolfe VA, Nino-Murcia M, Perkash I. Colostomy as treatment for complications of spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1990b;71:514-518.
  • Sun WM, MacDonagh R, Forster D, Thomas DG, Smallwood R, Read NW. Anorectal function in patients with complete spinal transection before and after sacral posterior rhizotomy. Gastroenterology 1995;108:990-998.
  • Teichman JMH, Harris JM, Currie DM, Barber DB. Malone antegrade continence enema for adults with neurogenic bowel disease. Journal of Urology 1998;160:1278-1281.
  • Teichman JMH, Zabihi N, Kraus SR, Harris JM, Barber DB. Long-term results for Malone antegrade continence enema for adults with neurogenic bowel disease. Urology 2003;61:502-506.
  • Tsai PY. Wang CP, Chiu FY, Tsai YA, Chang YC, Chuang TY. Efficacy of functional magnetic stimulation in neurogenic bowel dysfunction after spinal cord injury. J Rehabil Med 2009;41:41-47.
  • Uchikawa K, Takahashi H, Deguchi G, Liu M. A washing toilet seat with a CCD camera monitor to stimulate bowel movement in patients with spinal cord injury. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2007;86:200-204.
  • Valles M, Rodriguez A, Borau A, Mearin F. Effect of sacral anterior root stimulator on bowel dysfunction in patients with spinal cord injury. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 2009; 52(5): 986-992.
  • Wren FJ, Reese CT, Decter RM. Durability of the Malone antegrade continence enema in pregnancy. Urology 2003;61(3):644-644.
  • Yang CC, Stiens SA. Antegrade continence enema for the treatment of neurogenic constipation and fecal incontinence after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000;81:683-5.

Cardiovascular Health

Introduction

Persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) currently have an increased life expectancy owing to improvements in medical treatment (Rick Hansen Spinal Cord Injury Registry 2004). The majority of SCIs (80%) occur in individuals who are under 30 years of age (Rick Hansen Spinal Cord Injury Registry 2004, ICORD 2003,). Therefore, persons with SCI are susceptible to the same chronic conditions across the lifespan as able-bodied persons. In fact, cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of mortality in both able-bodied individuals and persons with SCI (Whiteneck et al 1992). However, there appears to be an earlier onset of CVD and/or an increased prevalence of CVD in persons with SCI (Bauman et al 1999b, DeVivo et al 1993, Whiteneck et al 1992, Yekutiel et al 1989). The separation of the autonomic nervous system from the superior brain centres after injury results in a series of changes that markedly affect the cardiovascular health of persons with SCI (Bravo et al 2004). Adrenergic dysfunction, poor diet, and physical inactivity are thought to play key roles in the elevated risk for CVD in SCI (Warburton et al 2007b).

As reviewed by Myers et al. (2007) there is consistent information indicating that there is a higher prevalence of CVD in persons with SCI in comparison to ambulatory populations (Groah et al 2001). For instance, the prevalence rates of symptomatic CVD in SCI have approximated 30%–50% in comparison to 5%–10% in the general able-bodied population (Myers et al 2007). Moreover, Bauman and colleagues revealed that the prevalence of asymptomatic CVD was 60%–70% in persons with SCI ( Bauman et al 1994, Bauman et al 1993). It also appears that persons with SCI have increased CVD-related mortality rates and those with tetraplegia experience mortality at earlier ages in comparison to able-bodied individuals (Myers et al 2007, DeVivo et al 1999, Whiteneck et al 1992). These are alarming statistics, which place a significant burden upon the patient, his/her family, and society as a whole.

Physical inactivity is a major independent risk factor for CVD and premature mortality (Warburton et al 2006b). Unfortunately, physical inactivity and marked deconditioning are highly prevalent among persons with SCI (Jacobs and Nash 2004). Also, it appears that the ordinary activities of daily living are not adequate to maintain cardiovascular fitness in persons with SCI (Hoffman 1986). It is likely that low levels of physical activity and fitness (as a result of wheelchair dependency) explain (in part) the increased risk for CVD (Myers et al 2007). Marked inactivity associated with SCI has been associated with lower high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol ( Manns et al 2005, Schmid et al 2000); elevated low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (Schmid et al 2000); triglycerides ( Manns et al 2005, Schmid et al 2000); total cholesterol levels (Schmid et al 2000); abnormal glucose homeostasis (Manns et al 2005, Elder et al 2004); increased adiposity ( Manns et al 2005, Elder et al 2004); and excessive reductions in aerobic fitness ( Manns et al 2005, Schmid et al 2000). It is important to note that SCI presents an additional risk for CVD above that seen in able-bodied individuals owing to the marked decrease in physical activity and injury-related changes in metabolic function (Bravo et al 2004). Moreover, a reduction in cardiovascular fitness may also lead to a vicious cycle of further decline, which results in a reduction in functional capacity and the ability to live an independent lifestyle. Based on the available literature, it is clear that effective exercise interventions are required to slow the progression of multiple risk factors for CVD and other chronic diseases (e.g. obesity, type 2 diabetes) in persons with SCI.

The current chapter summarizes and updates the literature regarding the risk for CVD in persons with SCI. This chapter also evaluates critically the level of evidence regarding the effectiveness of varied forms of exercise rehabilitation in increasing cardiovascular fitness and attenuating the risk for CVD in persons with SCI. Table 1 contains a definition of the commonly used terms and/or abbreviations in this chapter.

Table 1: Description of Commonly Used Terms

Warburton DER, Sproule S, Krassioukov A, Eng JJ (2010). Cardiovascular Health and Exercise Following Spinal Cord Injury. In Eng JJ, Teasell RW, Miller WC, Wolfe DL, Townson AF, Hsieh JTC, Connolly SJ, Mehta S, Sakakibara BM, editors. Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Evidence. Version 3.0. Vancouver: p 1-38.

The Risk for Cardiovascular Disease in Persons with SCI

The majority of CVD events are the result of atherosclerosis (i.e., narrowing and hardening of the arteries) (Grey et al 2003). Persons with SCI appear to be particularly susceptible to the development of atherosclerotic disease (Bravo et al 2004). Researchers have revealed that persons with SCI exhibit a series of risk factors for atherosclerotic disease and thus CVD (as shown in Table 2).

A healthy endothelium (interior lining of blood vessels) is essential for the protection against atherosclerosis (Anderson 2003). Relatively limited data exists regarding the vascular health of individuals with SCI (Zbogar et al 2008, de Groot et al 2005,). However, the majority (if not all) of the risk factors for CVD in persons with SCI will have a significant negative impact upon endothelial function. As such, it would appear that vascular dysfunction is also a central step in the development of CVD in persons with SCI. 

Table 2: Risk Factors for Cardiovascular Disease in Persons with SCI

Exercise Rehabilitation and Cardiovascular Fitness

Exercise rehabilitation has been shown to be an effective means of attenuating or reversing chronic disease in persons with SCI. Similar to the general able-bodied population (Warburton et al 2006a), habitual physical activity (beyond activities of daily living) can lead to numerous health benefits that significantly reduce the risk for multiple chronic conditions (in particular CVD) and premature mortality in persons with SCI. However, supporting evidence is relatively low in comparison to the general population and other clinical conditions (e.g., chronic heart failure (Warburton et al 2006b)).

The cardiovascular research conducted within the field of SCI has examined predominantly the effects of aerobic exercise and/or functional electrical stimulation (FES) training. In the following sections we will review the literature regarding to the effects of varied exercise interventions on the risk for CVD in persons with SCI. Particular attention will be given to the changes in cardiovascular fitness, glucose metabolism, and lipid lipoprotein profiles that occur after training interventions in persons with SCI.

Our search revealed 58 studies examining cardiovascular fitness before and after an exercise intervention. It is important to highlight, that our original search included many studies that examined the acute effects of an exercise intervention. However, for inclusion in this systematic review the article must have included the examination of the changes in cardiovascular fitness that occurred as a result of the training intervention (and not simply the temporal changes in cardiovascular parameters with the exercise modality). Within this context, our current search included investigations related to treadmill training (6 studies; n = 56), arm exercise (26 studies; n = 444), and FES (26 studies; n = 307) training.

Treadmill training

Body-weight–supported treadmill training (BWSTT) is an exercise protocol that has been used to potentially affect a number of domains, including motor recovery, bone density, cardiovascular fitness, respiratory function, as well as quality of life. Traditional BWSTT involves the upright walking on a motor-driven treadmill while a harness (suspended from an overhead pulley system) supports the participant’s body weight. Therapists conducting the session determine the magnitude of off-loading of an individual’s body weight (Phillips et al 2004). The treadmill velocity, the amount of body weight supported, and time spent on the treadmill can be individualized (Phillips et al 2004). Significant resources are often required as the majority of individuals will require one or two assistants to manually help ambulate the lower limbs.

Table 3: Effects of Body-weight Sported Treadmill Training on Cardiovascular Fitness and Health

Discussion

Three pre-post studies have been conducted (Soyupek et al. 2009, Ditor et al 2005a, Ditor et al 2005b, to determine changes in cardiovascular health. In the most recent studies, Jack et al (2009) examined two participants (with thoracic injuries) after BWSTT and revealed significant improvements in peak heart rate (HR) and oxygen consumption (VO2), and a decrease in the dynamic oxygen cost. Soyupek et al. (2009), evaluated 8 subjects and found significantly lower heart rate post-training and improved forced vital capacity and inspiratory capacity.

The two earlier studies were conducted by the same Canadian research group (Ditor et al 2005a, Ditor et al 2005b). They reported that BWSTT did not have substantial group effects on HR and blood pressure in motor-complete subjects but did reveal a significant reduction in resting HR in the study with incomplete tetraplegics. There was also evidence that improvements in HR and blood pressure variability may occur after BWSTT in incomplete SCI and a subset of participants with complete SCI. The authors attributed the change in blood pressure variability to reductions in sympathetic tone to the vasculature. These findings have significant physiological relevance since it indicates that both parasympathetic outflow to the heart (as evaluated by heart rate variability) and sympathetic flow to the vasculature (as evaluated by blood pressure variability) can adapt in response to exercise training. This research group also revealed the potential for improvements in vascular health (e.g., arterial compliance) after BWSTT in individuals with motor-complete SCI. There was no indication of the effects of BWSTT on peak oxygen consumption (VO2peak).

The mechanisms responsible for the improvement in markers of cardiovascular health and regulation in individuals with incomplete SCI remain to be determined. Jack et al. 2009 postulated that an improvement in walking ability likely explained the increase in VO2peak with training (in individuals with incomplete SCI). They also highlighted how marked atrophy, fast fatiguing lower limbs and limited neural control may limit the capacity of patients with SCI to make use of their cardiopulmonary reserve.

Ditor et al. (2005a,b) attributed the training-induced changes in autonomic function to the cardiovascular challenge provided by the upright nature of BSWTT (which potentially could be a sufficient stimulus in individuals with postural hypotension) and the spasticity created during the treadmill training. However, it should also be noted that both weight bearing and the passive movement of the limbs may contribute to the observed changes in these studies.

A recent Canadian study employing a randomized cross-over design (Millar et al 2009)revealed that short-term (4 weeks) BWSTT (but not head-up tilt training) led to a significant increase in HR complexity and reduced fractal scaling distance score in persons with SCI. These changes are thought to reflect an improvement in cardiac autonomic balance after short-term BWSTT.

Two investigations (a pre-post study (level 4) and a prospective controlled study (level 2)) from the same research group used partial BWSTT (30%–50%) via neuromuscular electrical stimulation assisted by physiotherapists ( de Carvalho et al 2006, Carvalho and Cliquet 2005). The first investigation revealed that three months of this form of gait training can result in a significant increase in systolic blood pressure at rest and during gait exercise in tetraplegic males (Carvalho and Cliquet 2005). In the latter study (de Carvalho et al 2006)the authors revealed that long-term neuromuscular electrical stimulation gait training (six months) resulted in significant increases in VO2 (36%), minute ventilation (30.5%), and systolic blood pressure (4.8%) during the gait phase. The authors concluded that treadmill gait training combined with neuromuscular electrical stimulation leads to increased metabolic and cardiorespiratory responses in persons with complete tetraplegia.

In a comparison of trials using BWSTT, an interesting discrepancy arises. For instance, in the work of Ditor et al., there was no change in resting blood pressure after BWSTT in individuals with complete or incomplete SCI (Ditor et al 2005a, Ditor et al 2005b). Whereas, the work by de Carvalho and coworkers revealed an increase in resting blood pressure following partial BWSTT (with neuromuscular electrical stimulation) ( de Carvalho et al 2006, Carvalho and Cliquet 2005). It is not clear why these discrepancies exist, and, as such, further research is clearly warranted.

Conclusion

  • There is level 1 evidence (Millar et al. 2009) that BWSTT improves cardiac autonomic balance in persons with tetraplegia and paraplegia (with similar results for varying degrees of lesion level and severity).
  • There is level 4 evidence that BWSTT increases peak oxygen uptake and heart rate, and decreases the dynamic oxygen cost for persons with SCI.
  • Level 4 evidence (Ditor et al. 2005b) indicates that BWSTT can improve arterial compliance in individuals with motor-complete SCI.
  • There is level 2 evidence (de Carvalho et al. 2006) that neuromuscular electrical stimulation gait training can increase metabolic and cardiorespiratory responses in persons with complete tetraplegia.
  • There is growing evidence that BWSTT can improve indicators of cardiovascular health in individuals with complete and incomplete tetraplegia and paraplegia.

Upper extremity exercise

Given the motor loss of the lower limbs following injury, upper extremity exercise is a logical choice for improving cardiovascular fitness and health. However, improving cardiovascular function can be challenging using the smaller mass of the arms especially when muscle fatigue can often occur before exercise training targets are met. From our search, we found four RCTs (one high quality (de Groot et al 2003)and three lower quality trials (Hicks et al 2003, Davis et al 1991, Davis et al 1987), two prospective controlled (Hooker and Wells 1989, Hjeltnes and Wallberg-Henriksson 1998), one cohort study (Valent et al 2008), and 19 pre-post studies.

Given the large number of studies that have looked at upper extremity exercise, we have tabled only those studies that included a control group consisting of participants with SCI (Table 4).

Table 4: Effects of upper extremity training on cardiovascular fitness and health.

Discussion

The reported improvements in aerobic capacity after aerobic arm training in SCI are approximately 20%–30%; however, it is not uncommon for improvements in excess of 50% (DiCarlo 1988). The majority of aerobic training investigations have evaluated the effectiveness of moderate (40%–59% heart rate reserve (HRR) or 55%–69% of maximum HR) to vigorous (60%–84% HRR or 70%–89% of maximum HR) intensity exercise. These studies have used arm ergometry, wheelchair ergometry, and swimming-based interventions. Based on the current level of literature, it appears that moderate intensity exercise performed 20–60 minutes per day for at least three days/week for a minimum of six weeks is effective for improving cardiovascular fitness and exercise tolerance in persons with SCI (Level 1 evidence based on one high-quality RCT(de Groot et al 2003) and several lower quality RCTs). Therefore, the general recommendations provided by agencies such as the Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology are appropriate for improving the cardiovascular fitness of persons with SCI. It is, however, important to note that training intensities may need to be established using a rating of perceived exertion (e.g., RPE) (rather than objective measures of heart rate) in individuals with SCI-induced autonomic denervation of the heart.

An exercise intensity threshold of 70% maximal HRR has been advocated for the attainment of training benefits when a minimal training duration (20 minutes) is the standard ( Bizzarini et al 2005, Tordi et al 2001, Hooker and Wells 1989). It is also apparent that improvements in exercise capacity and functional status may occur after training without significant changes in VO2peak, particularly in persons with tetraplegia (Hjeltnes and Wallberg-Henriksson 1998).

Questions remain regarding the primary mechanisms of importance for improvements in aerobic fitness after training. It is unclear whether central (heart and lung) or peripheral (skeletal muscle) adaptations are of key importance. Enhancements have been observed in peripheral muscle function. For instance, investigators have shown intrinsic cellular adaptations in the paralyzed muscle that facilitate oxidative metabolism following BWSTT (Stewart et al 2004). Only limited investigations, however, have shown an improvement in cardiac function after aerobic exercise training (Davis et al 1987). It could therefore be argued that peripheral adaptations are of primary importance to the improvement in aerobic capacity after aerobic exercise. However, this statement is somewhat misleading as the majority of studies have not evaluated directly cardiac output during maximal/peak exercise. This is owing to the fact that the assessment of maximal cardiac output during exercise is one of the most difficult procedures in clinical exercise physiology (Warburton et al 1999a, 1999b). When exercise measures of cardiac function have been taken, improvements in central function have been observed (Davis et al 1987). Further research examining the primary mechanism(s) of importance for the improved cardiovascular fitness and exercise capacity seen in persons with SCI after aerobic exercise training is warranted. It is also important to highlight that it is often difficult for patients to attain VO2max during exercise. Moreover, the submaximal prediction of VO2peak/VO2max (based on the heart rate response to exercise) is limited owing to the potential impairment in the sympathetic drive to the heart in many persons with SCI. Furthermore, it is often difficult to determine whether the changes in VO2peak/VO2max seen after training are related to changes in musculosketelal fitness rather than changes in cardiovascular fitness.

Less is known about the effects of resistance training on cardiovascular fitness. However, the incorporation of resistance training into the treatment of SCI appears to be essential. In fact, muscle weakness and dysfunction are key determinants of pain and functional status in persons with SCI. Previous studies have revealed improvements in VO2peak/VO2max ( Jacobs et al 2001, Cooney and Walker 1986), exercise tolerance (Jacobs et al 2001), and musculoskeletal fitness (Jacobs et al 2001) after resistance training (e.g., circuit training).

Conclusion

  • There is level 1 evidence (Davis et al. 1987) that moderate intensity aerobic arm training (performed 20–60 min/day, three days/week for at least 6-8 weeks) is effective in improving the aerobic capacity and exercise tolerance of persons with SCI.
  • There is level 1 evidence (de Groot et al. 2003) that vigorous intensity (70%–80% HRR) exercise leads to greater improvements in aerobic capacity than moderate intensity (50-60% HRR) exercise.
  • The relative importance of changes in cardiac function and the ability to extract oxygen at the periphery in persons with SCI after aerobic training remains to be determined.
  • There is level 2 evidence that hand cycling exercise increases the power output, oxygen consumption, and muscle strength in paraplegic, but not tetraplegic subjects during active rehabilitation. Conversely, there is level 4 evidence that hand cycling increases power output and oxygen consumption in tetraplegic subjects. Further research is clearly warranted.
  • Tetraplegics and paraplegics can improve their cardiovascular fitness and physical work capacity through aerobic arm cycling exercise training which are of moderate intensity, performed 20-60 min day, at least three times per week for a minimum of six to eight weeks. Resistance training at a moderate intensity at least two days per week also appears to be appropriate for the rehabilitation of persons with SCI. It remains to be determined the optimal exercise intervention for improving cardiovascular fitness.

Functional electrical stimulation (FES)

Computer-assisted FES during leg cycling has been shown to be an important and practical means of exercising a relatively large muscle mass in persons with SCI (Hooker et al 1992). These devices also permit the activation of the skeletal muscle pump during leg cycling. For these reasons, FES training has been advocated widely as an effective treatment strategy for SCI. It is important to note, that the physiological responses to FES training appear to be distinct from arm ergometry training. For instance, arm exercise has been shown to lead to faster VO2 kinetics (at a constant workload), greater changes in HR, and lower post-exercise blood lactates than FES leg cycling (Barstow et al 2000).

We identified 12 pre-post (Griffin et al 2009, Janssen and Pringle 2008, Zbogar et al 2008, Crameri et al 2004, Hopman et al 2002, Gerrits et al 2001, Mohr et al 1997, Hjeltnes et al 1997, Barstow et al 1996, Hooker et al 1992, , Faghri et al 1992, Ragnarsson et al 1988)studies (n = 132) that examined the effectiveness of FES leg cycle ergometry on indices of cardiovascular fitness and/or health in SCI. We also identified 6 pre-post (Thijssen et al 2006, Thijssen et al 2005, Gurney et al 1998, Mutton et al 1997, Krauss et al 1993, Pollack et al 1989)investigations (n = 55) that examined hybrid FES (combined leg and arm ergometry) on cardiovascular fitness in SCI. There were a further 7 pre-post (Berry et al 2008, Stoner et al 2007, Sabatier et al 2006, de Groot et al 2005, Wheeler et al 2002, Jacobs et al 1997, Solomonow et al 1997)investigations (n = 118) that examined the effects of other electrically assisted training programs on cardiovascular fitness and/or health.

FES Leg Cycle Ergometry

Table 5: Effects of functional electrical stimulation on cardiovascular fitness. 

Hybrid FES (Combined Leg and Arm Ergometry)

Table 6: Effects of hybrid FES training on cardiovascular fitness and health.

Other Electrically-Assisted Training Programs

Table 7: Effects of other electrically assisted training programs on cardiovascular fitness and health.

Discussion

There is a growing body of literature indicating that FES exercise training is an effective way of improving cardiovascular health, peak power output, and exercise tolerance/capacity in persons with SCI (Table 5). These studies generally employ a cycling motion, although rowing and bipedal ambulation have also been evaluated. It appears that moderate-to-vigorous intensity FES training (relative to baseline capacity) may be effective in enhancing cardiovascular fitness in persons with SCI. The majority of the investigations are pre-post designs (level 4) with investigators reporting marked changes in VO2max or VO2peak after FES training. Similar to aerobic training, 20%–40% changes in aerobic capacity are often observed after FES training. However, improvements in excess of 70% are not uncommon.(Faghri et al 1992)

Investigations with FES training have also shown an improvement in musculoskeletal fitness. Similar to arm exercise training, limited investigations have shown an improvement in cardiac function after FES training. A recent investigation has also revealed that the degree of muscular adaptation that can be achieved via FES exercise is dependent upon the load that is applied to the paralyzed muscle (Crameri et al 2004).

Researchers have also shown that hybrid exercise training (FES leg cycling combined with arm ergometry) may elicit greater changes in peak work rates and VO2peak/VO2max than FES leg- cycling exercise alone ( Mutton et al 1997, Krauss et al 1993). Moreover, it appears that the physiological adaptations to combined FES leg cycling and arm ergometry training are partially maintained after eight weeks of detraining (Gurney et al 1998). Other interventions (Table 7) that make use of hybrid FES training have also been shown to improve the exercise capacity and cardiovascular health of persons with SCI. It would appear that the potential adaptations with hybrid exercise may be greater than FES alone; however, further research is required to test this hypothesis.

A series of intrinsic muscle adaptations can also occur after FES training that enhance the ability for oxidative metabolism at the cellular level, which in turn facilitate improved endurance, exercise tolerance and functional capacity. Key intrinsic muscle adaptations that have been observed include an increase in the proportion of type 1 fibres, an enhancement in cross-sectional fibre area, an increase in capillary-to-fibre ratio, a shift towards more fatigue resistant contractile proteins, and an increase in citrate synthase activity. Given the importance of musculoskeletal fitness for health and functional status ( Warburton et al 2006c, Warburton et al 2001b, 2001a), further research is clearly warranted with persons with SCI. Accordingly, randomized, controlled exercise interventions (both arm and/or FES training) that evaluate concurrent changes in musculoskeletal fitness and health status are particularly needed.

Conclusion

  • There is level 4 evidence from multiple pre-post studies that FES training performed for a minimum of three days per week for two months may be effective for improving musculoskeletal fitness, the oxidative potential of muscle, exercise tolerance, and cardiovascular fitness.
  • There is level 4 evidence from multiple pre-post studies that FES training may be effective in improving exercise cardiac function in persons with SCI.
  • There is level 5 evidence that arm-cranking exercise assisted by FES increases peak power output, and may increase oxygen uptake.
  • Interventions that involve FES training a minimum of 3 days per week for 2 months may improve muscular endurance, oxidative metabolism, exercise tolerance, and cardiovascular fitness.

Other Forms of Exercise Interventions

Various forms of exercise interventions have been used in an attempt to improve the health status of persons with SCI (Ballaz et al 2008, Harness et al 2008, Ter Woerds et al 2006, Duran et al 2001, Hopman et al 1996). The forms of potential interventions are numerous and varied. As such, it is difficult to systematically review the literature regarding alternative forms of exercise interventions for SCI. Therefore, we have provided a brief summary of studies that have incorporated non-traditional forms of rehabilitation in SCI (Table 8).

Table 8: Other Forms of Exercise Interventions.

Discussion

The evidence supporting non-traditional forms of exercise interventions in SCI is not clear. This is to be expected given the varied training methodologies that can be employed. The lack of concrete information should not however dissuade researchers from considering non-traditional rehabilitation models when dealing with SCI. It is clear that novel models of exercise rehabilitation are warranted and desired in the rehabilitation of SCI. For instance, stand locomotor training has been shown to be highly effective in improving blood pressure control and orthostatic tolerance in persons with tetraplegia.

Some modalities of exercise that have been applied with success in able-bodied individuals (such as interactive video games (Warburton et al 2007a)) or other clinical populations (e.g. interval training (Warburton et al 2005)) may hold great promise for persons with SCI. As with early research with FES, it is essential that researchers demonstrate innovative thinking that is based upon a strong theoretical foundation.

Glucose homeostasis

Glucose intolerance and decreased insulin sensitivity are independent risk factors for CVD (Hurley and Hagberg 1998). Abnormal glucose homeostasis is associated with worsened lipid lipoprotein profiles and an increased risk for the development of hypertension and type 2 diabetes ( Warburton et al 2001b, 2001a, Hurley and Hagberg 1998). It is well-established that habitual physical activity is an effective primary preventative strategy against insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes in the general population.(Warburton et al 2006c). Although comparatively less information is available for SCI, it appears that exercise training programs are effective in improving glucose homeostasis (Mahoney et al 2005, Phillips et al 2004, de Groot et al 2003, Chilibeck et al 1999, Hjeltnes et al 1998). Key terms used when assessing glucose homeostasis are provided in Table 9.

Table 9: Glucose homeostasis key terms.

Table 10: Effects of exercise training on glucose metabolism in persons with spinal cord injury.

Discussion

The majority of the data is from experimental non-RCT trials. A search of the literature revealed seven investigations (n = 47). This included one RCT (de Groot et al 2003)and six experimental non-RCT (pre-post) trials(Mahoney et al 2005, Phillips et al 2004, Jeon et al 2002, Mohr et al 2001, Chilibeck et al 1999, Hjeltnes et al 1998). The single RCT involved the randomization to two different forms of exercise, and, as such, an exercise condition served as the control (Table 10). The majority (five) of these trials examined the effectiveness of FES training.

Similar to other studies in the field of SCI research, this area of investigation is limited by the lack of quality RCTs. Moreover, the majority of the research relates to the effects of FES training. Limited work has been conducted using aerobic and/or resistance exercise training. As a whole, however, these studies are consistent and reveal several important findings. For instance, the improvements in glucose homeostasis may be the result of increased lean body mass (and associated changes in insulin sensitivity) and increased expression of GLUT-4, glycogen synthase, and hexokinase in exercised muscle.

Consistent with findings in able-bodied individuals (Warburton et al 2001b, 2001a), the improvement in glucose homeostasis after exercise interventions (e.g., aerobic training or FES) does not appear to be related solely to decreases in body adiposity and/or increases in VO2max. This is due to the fact that significant improvements in glucose homeostasis can occur with minor changes in body composition and/or aerobic fitness.

It is also important to note that there appears to be a minimal volume of exercise required for improvements in glucose homeostasis. For instance, Mohr et al.(Mohr et al 2001)revealed that a reduction of FES training was not sufficient to maintain the beneficial changes in insulin sensitivity and GLUT-4 protein observed during a three days/week FES training program.     

Conclusion

  • There is level 1 evidence from 1 RCT (de Groot et al. 2003) and multiple level 4 studies (Jeon et al. 2002; Mohr et al. 2001; Chillibeck et al. 1999) that both aerobic and FES training (approximately 20–30 min/day, three days/week for eight weeks or more) are effective in improving glucose homeostasis in persons with SCI.
  • There is level 4 evidence from multiple pre-post studies that the changes in glucose homeostasis after aerobic or FES training are clinically significant for the prevention and/or treatment of type 2 diabetes.
  • Aerobic and FES exercise training may lead to clinically significant improvements in glucose homeostasis in persons with SCI. Preliminary evidence indicates that a minimum of 30 min of moderate intensity training on 3 days per week is required to achieve and/or maintain the benefits from exercise training.

Lipid lipoprotein profiles

Abnormal lipid lipoprotein profiles have been associated with an increased risk for CVD (Warburton et al 2006c, 2006b, Warburton et al 2001b, 2001a, Hurley and Hagberg 1998). Several studies have revealed worsened lipid lipoprotein profiles in persons with SCI (Dallmeijer et al 1997, Maki et al 1995, Krum et al 1992, Bauman et al 1992a, Brenes et al 1986, Dearwater et al 1986). Routine physical activity has been shown to enhance lipid lipoprotein profiles by reducing triglycerides (TG), increasing HDL, and lowering LDL/HDL in the general population.( Warburton et al 2006b, Warburton et al 2001b, 2001a). Although limited, similar findings have been observed in persons with SCI (El-Sayed and Younesian 2005, Stewart et al 2004, de Groot et al 2003, Nash et al 2001, Solomonow et al 1997, Hooker and Wells 1989,)(Table 12). Table 11 describes the common lipid lipoprotein measurements.

Table 11: Lipid Lipoprotein Profiles

Table 12: Effects of exercise training on lipid lipoprotein profiles in persons with spinal cord injury

Discussion

The information regarding the effects of exercise training on lipid lipoprotein profile is derived from one high-quality RCT (level 1),(de Groot et al 2003)one nonrandomized, prospective controlled trial (level 2),(Hooker and Wells 1989)and several level 4 studies (El-Sayed and Younesian 2005, Stewart et al 2004, Nash et al 2001, Solomonow et al 1997,)(N = 110). The majority of the investigations examined a form of aerobic training (either arm ergometry or assisted treadmill walking). Another investigation examined the effects of reciprocating gait orthosis powered with electrical muscle stimulation.

These findings provide level 1 evidence (based on one high-quality RCT and several lower quality studies) for the role of exercise in the reduction of atherogenic lipid lipoprotein profiles and the reduction of the risk for CVD in persons with SCI. It appears that a minimal threshold of training exists for changes in lipoprotein profile. For instance, authors have reported that 70% of maximal HRR (for at least 20 min/day, three days/week for eight weeks) is the threshold necessary to achieve significant improvements in lipid lipoprotein profiles. Future research is warranted, however, to quantify the effects of varying forms of exercise (including aerobic exercise, resistance exercise, and FES) on lipid lipoprotein profiles in persons with SCI.

Conclusion

  • There is level 1 evidence from 1 high quality RCT (de Groot et al. 2003) to suggest that aerobic exercise training programs (performed at a moderate to vigorous intensity 20-30 min/day, 3 days per week for 8 weeks) are effective in improving the lipid lipoprotein profiles of persons with SCI.
  • Preliminary evidence (level 4; Solomonow et al. 1997) also indicates that the use of a reciprocating gait orthosis with FES training (3 hours/week, for 14 weeks) may improve lipid lipoprotein profiles in SCI.
  • Aerobic and FES exercise training may lead to improvements in lipid lipoprotein profile that are clinically relevant for the at risk SCI population. The optimal training program for changes in lipid lipoprotein profile remains to be determined. However, a minimal aerobic exercise intensity of 70% of heart rate reserve on most days of the week appears to be a good general recommendation for improving lipid lipoprotein profile in persons with SCI.

Summary

Mountingevidence to suggests that persons with SCI are at an increased risk for CVD. Increasing data indicates that persons with SCI experience an earlier onset and increased prevalence of CVD. Similar to able-bodied individuals, physical inactivity plays a significant role in the risk for CVD in persons with SCI. In fact, the ordinary activities of daily living do not appear to be sufficient to maintain cardiovascular fitness in persons with SCI. Moreover, extremely low levels of physical activity and fitness may lead to a vicious cycle of further decline. Ultimately these changes will have significant implications for the development of CVD (and associated comorbidities) and the ability to live an independent lifestyle. It appears that SCI presents an additional risk for CVD above that observed in able-bodied individuals owing to marked physical deconditioning and injury-related changes in metabolic function (e.g., insulin resistance) ( Myers et al 2007, Bravo et al 2004).

Physical activity interventions have been shown to be effective at attenuating the progression of CVD and related comorbidities. The forms of exercise interventions are varied, and the experimental data are limited in comparison to other patient populations (i.e., chronic heart failure). However, there is compelling evidence supporting the health benefits of upper extremity aerobic exercise (level 1 and 4) and FES (level 4) training (see Tables 13 and 14). For instance, there is research indicating that upper extremity exercise at a moderate-to-vigorous intensity, three days/week for at least six weeks, improves cardiovascular fitness and exercise tolerance in persons with SCI. The optimal exercise intervention for improving cardiovascular fitness remains to be determined. There is level 1 evidence (de Groot et al 2003)that high-intensity (70%–80% HRR) exercise leads to greater improvements in peak power and VO2peak than low-intensity (50%–60% HRR) exercise. Further investigation is required to determine the relative roles that cardiac and peripheral muscle function play in the improvement of exercise capacity in persons with SCI. There is level 4 (pre-post) evidence that resistance training at a moderate intensity for at least two days/week also appears to be appropriate for the rehabilitation of persons with SCI (Mahoney et al 2005, Jacobs et al 2001, Nash et al 2001, Cooney and Walker 1986,).

Table 13: Management of the risk for cardiovascular disease in persons with spinal cord injury through aerobic exercise training interventions.

Table 14: Management of the risk for cardiovascular disease in persons with spinal cord injury through functional electrical stimulation training interventions.

There is growing evidence (predominantly level 4) from several pre-post trials that FES training for a minimum of three days/week for two months can improve oxidative metabolism (Crameri et al 2004, Crameri et al 2002, Mohr et al 1997, Andersen et al 1996)exercise tolerance (Thijssen et al 2005, Wheeler et al 2002, Mohr et al 1997, Barstow et al 1996, Hooker et al 1992, Pollack et al 1989)and cardiovascular fitness (Wheeler et al 2002, Hjeltnes et al 1997, Mohr et al 1997, Barstow et al 1996, Thijssen et al 2005, Hooker et al 1992, Pollack et al 1989,). There is limited (level 4) evidence (Ditor et al 2005a, Ditor et al 2005b)that BWSTT can improve indicators of cardiovascular health in individuals with complete and incomplete SCI.

Preliminary (levels 1 and 4) evidence indicates that aerobic and FES exercise training programs (performed 30 min/day, three days per week for eight weeks or more) are effective in improving glucose homeostasis in persons with SCI (de Groot et al 2003, Jeon et al 2002). The magnitude of change in glucose homeostasis appears to be of clinical significance for the prevention and/or treatment of type 2 diabetes in persons with SCI.

There is level 1 evidence from a  high-quality RCT (de Groot et al 2003)and several pre-post studies (El-Sayed and Younesian 2005, Stewart et al 2004, Hooker and Wells 1989)to suggest that aerobic exercise training programs (performed at a moderate-to-vigorous intensity 20–30 min/day, three days/week for eight weeks) are effective in improving the lipid lipoprotein profiles of persons with SCI. The optimal training program for changes in lipid lipoprotein profile remains to be determined. However, a minimal aerobic exercise intensity of 70% of HRR on most days of the week appears to be a good general recommendation for improving lipid lipoprotein profile. Preliminary level 4 data also indicate that FES training (three hr/week for 14 weeks) may improve lipid lipoprotein profiles in SCI (Solomonow et al 1997).

As discussed throughout this article, a growing body of evidence supports the existence of an increased risk for CVD and CVD-related mortality in persons with SCI. Marked physical inactivity appears to play a central role in the increased risk for CVD in persons with SCI. Intuitively, exercise training should lead to significant reductions in the risk for CVD and improved overall quality of life in the SCI population. However, the relationship between increasing physical activity and health status of SCI has not been evaluated adequately to date. Based on preliminary evidence (primarily level 4), it would appear that various exercise modalities (including arm ergometry, resistance training, BWSTT, and FES) may attenuate and/or reverse abnormalities in glucose homeostasis, lipid lipoprotein profiles, and cardiovascular fitness. As such, exercise training appears to be an important therapeutic intervention for reducing the risk for CVD and multiple comorbidities (such as type 2 diabetes, hypertension, obesity) in individuals with SCI. Well-designed RCTs are required in the future to establish firmly the primary mechanisms by which exercise interventions elicit these beneficial changes. Similarly, further research is required to evaluate the effects of lesion level and injury severity on exercise prescription, such that exercise programs can be developed that address the varied needs of persons with SCI. Moreover, long-term follow-up investigations are required to determine whether training-induced changes in risk factors for CVD translate directly into a reduced incidence of CVD and premature mortality in persons with SCI.

  • There is level 1 evidence (Millar et al. 2009) that BWSTT improves cardiac autonomic balance in persons with tetraplegia and paraplegia (with similar results for varying degrees of lesion level and severity).
  • There is level 4 evidence that BWSTT increase peak oxygen uptake and heart rate, and decreases the dynamic oxygen cost for persons with SCI.
  • Level 4 evidence (Ditor et al. 2005b) indicates that BWSTT can improve arterial compliance in individuals with motor-complete SCI.
  • There is level 2 evidence (de Carvalho et al. 2006) that neuromuscular electrical stimulation gait training can increase metabolic and cardiorespiratory responses in persons with complete tetraplegia.
  • There is level 1 evidence (Davis et al. 1987) that moderate intensity aerobic arm training (performed 20–60 min/day, three days/week for at least 6-8 weeks) is effective in improving the aerobic capacity and exercise tolerance of persons with SCI.
  • There is level 1 evidence (de Groot et al. 2003) that vigorous intensity (70%–80% HRR) exercise leads to greater improvements in aerobic capacity than moderate intensity (50-60% HRR) exercise.
  • The relative importance of changes in cardiac function and the ability to extract oxygen at the periphery in persons with SCI after aerobic training remains to be determined.
  • There is level 2 evidence that hand cycling exercise increases the power output, oxygen consumption, and muscle strength in paraplegic, but not tetraplegic subjects during active rehabilitation. Conversely, there is level 4 evidence that hand cycling increases power output and oxygen consumption in tetraplegic subjects.
  • There is level 4 evidence from multiple pre-post studies that FES training performed for a minimum of three days per week for two months may be effective for improving musculoskeletal fitness, the oxidative potential of muscle, exercise tolerance, and cardiovascular fitness.
  • There is level 4 evidence from multiple pre-post studies that FES training may be effective in improving exercise cardiac function in persons with SCI.
  • There is level 5 evidence that arm-cranking exercise assisted by FES increases peak power output, and may increase oxygen uptake.
  • There is level 1 evidence from 1 RCT (de Groot et al. 2003) and multiple level 4 studies (Chillibeck et al. 1999; Mohr et al. 2001; Jeon et al. 2002) that both aerobic and FES training (approximately 20–30 min/day, three days/week for eight weeks or more) are effective in improving glucose homeostasis in persons with SCI.
  • There is level 4 evidence from multiple pre-post studies that the changes in glucose homeostasis after aerobic or FES training are clinically significant for the prevention and/or treatment of type 2 diabetes.
  • There is level 1 evidence from 1 high quality RCT (de Groot et al. 2003) to suggest that aerobic exercise training programs (performed at a moderate to vigorous intensity 20-30 min/day, 3 days per week for 8 weeks) are effective in improving the lipid lipoprotein profiles of persons with SCI.
  • Preliminary evidence (level 4; Solomonow et al. 1997) also indicates that the use of a reciprocating gait orthosis with FES training (3 hours/week, for 14 weeks) may improve lipid lipoprotein profiles in SCI.

Key Points

  • There is growing evidence that BWSTT can improve indicators of cardiovascular health in individuals with complete and incomplete tetraplegia and paraplegia.
  • Tetraplegics and paraplegics can improve their cardiovascular fitness and physical work capacity through aerobic arm cycling exercise training which are of moderate intensity, performed 20-60 min day, at least three times per week for a minimum of six to eight weeks. Resistance training at a moderate intensity at least two days per week also appears to be appropriate for the rehabilitation of persons with SCI. It remains to be determined the optimal exercise intervention for improving cardiovascular fitness.
  • Interventions that involve FES training a minimum of 3 days per week for 2 months may improve muscular endurance, oxidative metabolism, exercise tolerance, and cardiovascular fitness.
  • Aerobic and FES exercise training may lead to clinically significant improvements in glucose homeostasis in persons with SCI. Preliminary evidence indicates that a minimum of 30 min of moderate intensity training on 3 days per week is required to achieve and/or maintain the benefits from exercise training.
  • Aerobic and FES exercise training may lead to improvements in lipid lipoprotein profile that are clinically relevant for the at risk SCI population. The optimal training program for changes in lipid lipoprotein profile remains to be determined. However, a minimal aerobic exercise intensity of 70% of heart rate reserve on most days of the week appears to be a good general recommendation for improving lipid lipoprotein profile in persons with SCI.

References

  • Andersen JL, Mohr T, Biering-Sorensen F, Galbo H, Kjaer M. Myosin heavy chain isoform transformation in single fibres from m. vastus lateralis in spinal cord injured individuals: effects of long-term functional electrical stimulation (FES). Pflugers Arch 1996;431(4):513-8.
  • Anderson TJ. Nitric oxide, atherosclerosis and the clinical relevance of endothelial dysfunction. Heart Fail Rev 2003;8(1):71-86.
  • Ballaz L, Fusco N, Cretual A, Langella B, Brissot R. Peripheral vascular changes after home-based passive leg cycle exercise training in people with paraplegia: a pilot study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008;89(11):2162-6.
  • Barstow TJ, Scremin AM, Mutton DL, Kunkel CF, Cagle TG, Whipp BJ. Changes in gas exchange kinetics with training in patients with spinal cord injury. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1996;28(10):1221-8.
  • Barstow TJ, Scremin AM, Mutton DL, Kunkel CF, Cagle TG, Whipp BJ. Peak and kinetic cardiorespiratory responses during arm and leg exercise in patients with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2000;38(6):340-5.
  • Bauman WA, Adkins RH, Spungen AM, Herbert R, Schechter C, Smith D, et al. Is immobilization associated with an abnormal lipoprotein profile? Observations from a diverse cohort. Spinal Cord 1999a;37(7):485-93.
  • Bauman WA, Adkins RH, Spungen AM, Kemp BJ, Waters RL. The effect of residual neurological deficit on serum lipoproteins in individuals with chronic spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 1998;36(1):13-7.
  • Bauman WA, Adkins RH, Spungen AM, Waters RL, Kemp B, Herbert V. Levels of plasma homocysteine in persons with spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med 2001;24(2):81-6.
  • Bauman WA, Kahn NN, Grimm DR, Spungen AM. Risk factors for atherogenesis and cardiovascular autonomic function in persons with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 1999b;37(9):601-16.
  • Bauman WA, Raza M, Chayes Z, Machac J. Tomographic thallium-201 myocardial perfusion imaging after intravenous dipyridamole in asymptomatic subjects with quadriplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993;74(7):740-4.
  • Bauman WA, Raza M, Spungen AM, Machac J. Cardiac stress testing with thallium-201 imaging reveals silent ischemia in individuals with paraplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994;75(9):946-50.
  • Bauman WA, Spungen AM. Metabolic changes in persons after spinal cord injury. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2000;11(1):109-40.
  • Bauman WA, Spungen AM. Carbohydrate and lipid metabolism in chronic spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med 2001;24(4):266-77.
  • Bauman WA, Spungen AM, Adkins RH, Kemp BJ. Metabolic and endocrine changes in persons aging with spinal cord injury. Assist Technol 1999c;11(2):88-96.
  • Bauman WA, Spungen AM, Raza M, Rothstein J, Zhang RL, Zhong YG, et al. Coronary artery disease: metabolic risk factors and latent disease in individuals with paraplegia. Mt Sinai J Med 1992a;59(2):163-8.
  • Bauman WA, Spungen AM, Zhong YG, Rothstein JL, Petry C, Gordon SK. Depressed serum high density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in veterans with spinal cord injury. Paraplegia 1992b;30(10):697-703.
  • Berry HR, Perret C, Saunders BA, Kakebeeke TH, Donaldson Nde N, Allan DB, et al. Cardiorespiratory and power adaptations to stimulated cycle training in paraplegia. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2008;40(9):1573-80.
  • Bizzarini E, Saccavini M, Lipanje F, Magrin P, Malisan C, Zampa A. Exercise prescription in subjects with spinal cord injuries. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86(6):1170-5.
  • Bravo G, Guizar-Sahagun G, Ibarra A, Centurion D, Villalon CM. Cardiovascular alterations after spinal cord injury: an overview. Curr Med Chem Cardiovasc Hematol Agents 2004;2(2):133-48.
  • Brenes G, Dearwater S, Shapera R, LaPorte RE, Collins E. High density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations in physically active and sedentary spinal cord injured patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1986;67(7):445-50.
  • Carvalho DC, Cliquet A, Jr. Response of the arterial blood pressure of quadriplegic patients to treadmill gait training. Braz J Med Biol Res 2005;38(9):1367-73.
  • Chilibeck PD, Bell G, Jeon J, Weiss CB, Murdoch G, MacLean I, et al. Functional electrical stimulation exercise increases GLUT-1 and GLUT-4 in paralyzed skeletal muscle. Metabolism 1999;48(11):1409-13.
  • Claus-Walker J, Halstead LS. Metabolic and endocrine changes in spinal cord injury: II (section 2). Partial decentralization of the autonomic nervous system. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1982a;63(11):576-80.
  • Claus-Walker J, Halstead LS. Metabolic and endocrine changes in spinal cord injury: III. Less quanta of sensory input plus bedrest and illness. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1982b;63(12):628-31.
  • Cooney MM, Walker JB. Hydraulic resistance exercise benefits cardiovascular fitness of spinal cord injured. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1986;18(5):522-5.
  • Coupaud S, Gollee H, Hunt KJ, Fraser MH, Allan DB, McLean AN. Arm-cranking exercise assisted by Functional Electrical Stimulation in C6 tetraplegia: a pilot study. Technol Health Care 2008;16(6):415-27.
  • Crameri RM, Cooper P, Sinclair PJ, Bryant G, Weston A. Effect of load during electrical stimulation training in spinal cord injury. Muscle Nerve 2004;29(1):104-11.
  • Crameri RM, Weston A, Climstein M, Davis GM, Sutton JR. Effects of electrical stimulation-induced leg training on skeletal muscle adaptability in spinal cord injury. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2002;12(5):316-22.
  • Dallmeijer AJ, Hopman MT, van der Woude LH. Lipid, lipoprotein, and apolipoprotein profiles in active and sedentary men with tetraplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997;78(11):1173-6.
  • Davis G, Plyley MJ, Shephard RJ. Gains of cardiorespiratory fitness with arm-crank training in spinally disabled men. Can J Sport Sci 1991;16(1):64-72.
  • Davis GM, Shephard RJ, Leenen FH. Cardiac effects of short term arm crank training in paraplegics: echocardiographic evidence. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1987;56(1):90-6.
  • de Carvalho DC, Martins CL, Cardoso SD, Cliquet A. Improvement of metabolic and cardiorespiratory responses through treadmill gait training with neuromuscular electrical stimulation in quadriplegic subjects. Artif Organs 2006;30(1):56-63.
  • de Groot P, Crozier J, Rakobowchuk M, Hopman M, MacDonald M. Electrical stimulation alters FMD and arterial compliance in extremely inactive legs. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2005;37(8):1356-64.
  • de Groot PC, Hjeltnes N, Heijboer AC, Stal W, Birkeland K. Effect of training intensity on physical capacity, lipid profile and insulin sensitivity in early rehabilitation of spinal cord injured individuals. Spinal Cord 2003;41(12):673-9.
  • Dearwater SR, LaPorte RE, Robertson RJ, Brenes G, Adams LL, Becker D. Activity in the spinal cord-injured patient: an epidemiologic analysis of metabolic parameters. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1986;18(5):541-4.
  • DeVivo MJ, Black KJ, Stover SL. Causes of death during the first 12 years after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993;74(3):248-54.
  • DeVivo MJ, Krause JS, Lammertse DP. Recent trends in mortality and causes of death among persons with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80(11):1411-9.
  • DiCarlo SE. Effect of arm ergometry training on wheelchair propulsion endurance of individuals with quadriplegia. Phys Ther 1988;68(1):40-4.
  • DiCarlo SE, Supp MD, Taylor HC. Effect of arm ergometry training on physical work capacity of individuals with spinal cord injuries. Phys Ther 1983;63(7):1104-7.
  • Ditor DS, Kamath MV, MacDonald MJ, Bugaresti J, McCartney N, Hicks AL. Effects of body weight-supported treadmill training on heart rate variability and blood pressure variability in individuals with spinal cord injury. J Appl Physiol 2005a;98(4):1519-25.
  • Ditor DS, Macdonald MJ, Kamath MV, Bugaresti J, Adams M, McCartney N, et al. The effects of body-weight supported treadmill training on cardiovascular regulation in individuals with motor-complete SCI. Spinal Cord 2005b;43(11):664-73.
  • Duran FS, Lugo L, Ramirez L, Eusse E. Effects of an exercise program on the rehabilitation of patients with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82(10):1349-54.
  • Elder CP, Apple DF, Bickel CS, Meyer RA, Dudley GA. Intramuscular fat and glucose tolerance after spinal cord injury--a cross-sectional study. Spinal Cord 2004;42(12):711-6.
  • El-Sayed MS, Younesian A. Lipid profiles are influenced by arm cranking exercise and training in individuals with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2005;43(5):299-305.
  • El-Sayed MS, Younesian A, Rahman K, Ismail FM, El-Sayed Ali Z. The effects of arm cranking exercise and training on platelet aggregation in male spinal cord individuals. Thromb Res 2004;113(2):129-36.
  • Faghri PD, Glaser RM, Figoni SF. Functional electrical stimulation leg cycle ergometer exercise: training effects on cardiorespiratory responses of spinal cord injured subjects at rest and during submaximal exercise. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1992;73(11):1085-93.
  • Frost F, Roach MJ, Kushner I, Schreiber P. Inflammatory C-reactive protein and cytokine levels in asymptomatic people with chronic spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86(2):312-7.
  • Gass GC, Watson J, Camp EM, Court HJ, McPherson LM, Redhead P. The effects of physical training on high level spinal lesion patients. Scand J Rehabil Med 1980;12(2):61-5.
  • Gerrits HL, de Haan A, Sargeant AJ, van Langen H, Hopman MT. Peripheral vascular changes after electrically stimulated cycle training in people with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82(6):832-9.
  • Grey E, Bratteli C, Glasser SP, Alinder C, Finkelstein SM, Lindgren BR, et al. Reduced small artery but not large artery elasticity is an independent risk marker for cardiovascular events. Am J Hypertens 2003;16(4):265-9.
  • Griffin L, Decker MJ, Hwang JY, Wang B, Kitchen K, Ding Z, et al. Functional electrical stimulation cycling improves body composition, metabolic and neural factors in persons with spinal cord injury. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2009;19(4):614-22.
  • Groah SL, Weitzenkamp D, Sett P, Soni B, Savic G. The relationship between neurological level of injury and symptomatic cardiovascular disease risk in the aging spinal injured. Spinal Cord 2001;39(6):310-7.
  • Gurney AB, Robergs RA, Aisenbrey J, Cordova JC, McClanahan L. Detraining from total body exercise ergometry in individuals with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 1998;36(11):782-9.
  • Harkema SJ, Ferreira CK, van den Brand RJ, Krassioukov AV. Improvements in orthostatic instability with standard locomotor training in individuals with spinal cord injury. Journal of Neurotrauma 2008; 25: 1467-1475.
  • Harness ET, Yozbatiran N, Cramer SC. Effects of intense exercise in chronic spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2008;46(11):733-7.
  • Hicks AL, Martin KA, Ditor DS, Latimer AE, Craven C, Bugaresti J, et al. Long-term exercise training in persons with spinal cord injury: effects on strength, arm ergometry performance and psychological well-being. Spinal Cord 2003;41(1):34-43.
  • Hjeltnes N, Aksnes AK, Birkeland KI, Johansen J, Lannem A, Wallberg-Henriksson H. Improved body composition after 8 wk of electrically stimulated leg cycling in tetraplegic patients. Am J Physiol 1997;273(3 Pt 2):R1072-9.
  • Hjeltnes N, Galuska D, Bjornholm M, Aksnes AK, Lannem A, Zierath JR, et al. Exercise-induced overexpression of key regulatory proteins involved in glucose uptake and metabolism in tetraplegic persons: molecular mechanism for improved glucose homeostasis. Faseb J 1998;12(15):1701-12.
  • Hjeltnes N, Wallberg-Henriksson H. Improved work capacity but unchanged peak oxygen uptake during primary rehabilitation in tetraplegic patients. Spinal Cord 1998;36(10):691-8.
  • Hoffman MD. Cardiorespiratory fitness and training in quadriplegics and paraplegics. Sports Med 1986;3(5):312-30.
  • Hooker SP, Figoni SF, Rodgers MM, Glaser RM, Mathews T, Suryaprasad AG, et al. Physiologic effects of electrical stimulation leg cycle exercise training in spinal cord injured persons. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1992;73(5):470-6.
  • Hooker SP, Wells CL. Effects of low- and moderate-intensity training in spinal cord-injured persons. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1989;21(1):18-22.
  • Hopman MT, Dallmeijer AJ, Snoek G, van der Woude LH. The effect of training on cardiovascular responses to arm exercise in individuals with tetraplegia. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1996;74(1-2):172-9.
  • Hopman MT, Groothuis JT, Flendrie M, Gerrits KH, Houtman S. Increased vascular resistance in paralyzed legs after spinal cord injury is reversible by training. J Appl Physiol 2002;93(6):1966-72.
  • Hurley BF, Hagberg JM. Optimizing health in older persons: aerobic or strength training? Exercise and Sport Science Reviews 1998;26:61-89.
  • ICORD. SCI Facts and Stats. In: International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries; 2003.
  • Jack LP, Allan DB, Hunt KJ. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing during body weight supported treadmill exercise in incomplete spinal cord injury: a feasibility study. Technol Health Care 2009;17(1):13-23.
  • Jacobs PL, Mahoney ET, Nash MS, Green BA. Circuit resistance training in persons with complete paraplegia. J Rehabil Res Dev 2002;39(1):21-8.
  • Jacobs PL, Nash MS. Exercise recommendations for individuals with spinal cord injury. Sports Med 2004;34(11):727-51.
  • Jacobs PL, Nash MS, Klose KJ, Guest RS, Needham-Shropshire BM, Green BA. Evaluation of a training program for persons with SCI paraplegia using the Parastep 1 ambulation system: part 2. Effects on physiological responses to peak arm ergometry. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997;78(8):794-8.
  • Jacobs PL, Nash MS, Rusinowski JW. Circuit training provides cardiorespiratory and strength benefits in persons with paraplegia. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001;33(5):711-7.
  • Janssen TW, Pringle DD. Effects of modified electrical stimulation-induced leg cycle ergometer training for individuals with spinal cord injury. J Rehabil Res Dev 2008;45(6):819-30.
  • Jeon JY, Weiss CB, Steadward RD, Ryan E, Burnham RS, Bell G, et al. Improved glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity after electrical stimulation-assisted cycling in people with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2002;40(3):110-7.
  • Kahn N, Sinha A, Bauman W. Impaired platelet prostacyclin receptor activity: a monozygotic twin study discordant for spinal cord injury. Clin Physiol 2001;21(1):60-6.
  • Kahn NN. Platelet-stimulated thrombin and PDGF are normalized by insulin and Ca2+ channel blockers. Am J Physiol 1999;276(5 Pt 1):E856-62.
  • Krauss JC, Robergs RA, Depaepe JL, Kopriva LM, Aisenbury JA, Anderson MA, et al. Effects of electrical stimulation and upper body training after spinal cord injury. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1993;25(9):1054-61.
  • Krum H, Howes LG, Brown DJ, Ungar G, Moore P, McNeil JJ, et al. Risk factors for cardiovascular disease in chronic spinal cord injury patients. Paraplegia 1992;30(6):381-8.
  • Lee MY, Myers J, Abella J, Froelicher VF, Perkash I, Kiratli BJ. Homocysteine and hypertension in persons with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2005a.
  • Lee MY, Myers J, Hayes A, Madan S, Froelicher VF, Perkash I, et al. C-reactive protein, metabolic syndrome, and insulin resistance in individuals with spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med 2005b;28(1):20-5.
  • Mahoney ET, Bickel CS, Elder C, Black C, Slade JM, Apple D, Jr., et al. Changes in skeletal muscle size and glucose tolerance with electrically stimulated resistance training in subjects with chronic spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86(7):1502-4.
  • Maki KC, Briones ER, Langbein WE, Inman-Felton A, Nemchausky B, Welch M, et al. Associations between serum lipids and indicators of adiposity in men with spinal cord injury. Paraplegia 1995;33(2):102-9.
  • Manns PJ, McCubbin JA, Williams DP. Fitness, inflammation, and the metabolic syndrome in men with paraplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86(6):1176-81.
  • Millar PJ, Rakobowchuk M, Adams MM, Hicks AL, McCartney N, MacDonald MJ. Effects of short-term training on heart rate dynamics in individuals with spinal cord injury. Auton Neurosci 2009;150(1-2):116-21.
  • Miranda AR, Hassouna HI. Mechanisms of thrombosis in spinal cord injury. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2000;14(2):401-16.
  • Mohr T, Andersen JL, Biering-Sorensen F, Galbo H, Bangsbo J, Wagner A, et al. Long-term adaptation to electrically induced cycle training in severe spinal cord injured individuals. Spinal Cord 1997;35(1):1-16.
  • Mohr T, Dela F, Handberg A, Biering-Sorensen F, Galbo H, Kjaer M. Insulin action and long-term electrically induced training in individuals with spinal cord injuries. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001;33(8):1247-52.
  • Mutton DL, Scremin AM, Barstow TJ, Scott MD, Kunkel CF, Cagle TG. Physiologic responses during functional electrical stimulation leg cycling and hybrid exercise in spinal cord injured subjects. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997;78(7):712-8.
  • Myers J, Lee M, Kiratli J. Cardiovascular disease in spinal cord injury: an overview of prevalence, risk, evaluation, and management. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2007;86(2):142-52.
  • Myllynen P, Koivisto VA, Nikkila EA. Glucose intolerance and insulin resistance accompany immobilization. Acta Med Scand 1987;222(1):75-81.
  • Nash MS, Jacobs PL, Mendez AJ, Goldberg RB. Circuit resistance training improves the atherogenic lipid profiles of persons with chronic paraplegia. J Spinal Cord Med 2001;24(1):2-9.
  • Phillips SM, Stewart BG, Mahoney DJ, Hicks AL, McCartney N, Tang JE, et al. Body-weight-support treadmill training improves blood glucose regulation in persons with incomplete spinal cord injury. J Appl Physiol 2004;97(2):716-24.
  • Pollack SF, Axen K, Spielholz N, Levin N, Haas F, Ragnarsson KT. Aerobic training effects of electrically induced lower extremity exercises in spinal cord injured people. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1989;70(3):214-9.
  • Ragnarsson KT, Pollack S, O'Daniel W, Jr., Edgar R, Petrofsky J, Nash MS. Clinical evaluation of computerized functional electrical stimulation after spinal cord injury: a multicenter pilot study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1988;69(9):672-7.
  • Rick Hansen Spinal Cord Injury Registry. Spinal cord injury facts and statistics. Vancouver, BC: Rick Hansen Spinal Cord Injury Registry; 2004.
  • Roussi J, Bentolila S, Boudaoud L, Casadevall N, Vallee C, Carlier R, et al. Contribution of D-Dimer determination in the exclusion of deep venous thrombosis in spinal cord injury patients. Spinal Cord 1999;37(8):548-52.
  • Sabatier MJ, Stoner L, Mahoney ET, Black C, Elder C, Dudley GA, et al. Electrically stimulated resistance training in SCI individuals increases muscle fatigue resistance but not femoral artery size or blood flow. Spinal Cord 2006;44(4):227-33.
  • Schmid A, Halle M, Stutzle C, Konig D, Baumstark MW, Storch MJ, et al. Lipoproteins and free plasma catecholamines in spinal cord injured men with different injury levels. Clin Physiol 2000;20(4):304-10.
  • Solomonow M, Reisin E, Aguilar E, Baratta RV, Best R, D'Ambrosia R. Reciprocating gait orthosis powered with electrical muscle stimulation (RGO II). Part II: Medical evaluation of 70 paraplegic patients. Orthopedics 1997;20(5):411-8.
  • Soyupek F, Savas S, Ozturk O, Ilgun E, Biran A, Akkaya A. Effects of body weight supported treadmill training on cardiac and pulmonary functions in the patients with incomplete spinal cord injury. Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation 2009; 22: 213-218.
  • Spungen AM, Adkins RH, Stewart CA, Wang J, Pierson RN, Jr., Waters RL, et al. Factors influencing body composition in persons with spinal cord injury: a cross-sectional study. J Appl Physiol 2003;95(6):2398-407.
  • Stewart BG, Tarnopolsky MA, Hicks AL, McCartney N, Mahoney DJ, Staron RS, et al. Treadmill training-induced adaptations in muscle phenotype in persons with incomplete spinal cord injury. Muscle Nerve 2004;30(1):61-8.
  • Stoner L, Sabatier MJ, Mahoney ET, Dudley GA, McCully KK. Electrical stimulation-evoked resistance exercise therapy improves arterial health after chronic spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2007;45(1):49-56.
  • Sutbeyaz ST, Koseoglu BF, Gokkaya NK. The combined effects of controlled breathing techniques and ventilatory and upper extremity muscle exercise on cardiopulmonary responses in patients with spinal cord injury. Int J Rehabil Res 2005;28(3):273-6.
  • Ter Woerds W, De Groot PC, van Kuppevelt DH, Hopman MT. Passive leg movements and passive cycling do not alter arterial leg blood flow in subjects with spinal cord injury. Phys Ther 2006;86(5):636-45.
  • Thijssen DH, Ellenkamp R, Smits P, Hopman MT. Rapid vascular adaptations to training and detraining in persons with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006;87(4):474-81.
  • Thijssen DH, Heesterbeek P, van Kuppevelt DJ, Duysens J, Hopman MT. Local vascular adaptations after hybrid training in spinal cord-injured subjects. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2005;37(7):1112-8.
  • Tordi N, Dugue B, Klupzinski D, Rasseneur L, Rouillon JD, Lonsdorfer J. Interval training program on a wheelchair ergometer for paraplegic subjects. Spinal Cord 2001;39(10):532-7.
  • Vaidyanathan S, Soni BM, Singh G, Mansour P, Watt JW, Sett P, et al. Recurrent urinary infection, raised serum levels of C-reactive protein, and the risk of cardiovascular disease in patients with spinal cord injury: a hypothesis. Spinal Cord 1998;36(12):868-9.
  • Valent LJM, Dallmeijer AJ, Houdijk H, Slootman HJ, Janssen TW, Post MWM, van der Woude LH. Physical capacity in individuals with tetraplegia: A clinical trial. Phys Ther. 2009; 89: 1051-1060.
  • Valent LJ, Dallmeijer AJ, Houdijk H, Slootman HJ, Post MW, van der Woude LH. Influence of hand cycling on physical capacity in the rehabilitation of persons with a spinal cord injury: a longitudinal cohort study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008;89(6):1016-22.
  • Warburton DE, Bredin SS, Horita LT, Zbogar D, Scott JM, Esch BT, et al. The health benefits of interactive video game exercise. Applied Physiology, Nutrition and Metabolism 2007a;32(4):655-663.
  • Warburton DE, Gledhill N, Quinney A. The effects of changes in musculoskeletal fitness on health. Can J Appl Physiol 2001a;26(2):161-216.
  • Warburton DE, Gledhill N, Quinney A. Musculoskeletal fitness and health. Can J Appl Physiol 2001b;26(2):217-37.
  • Warburton DE, Haykowsky MJ, Quinney HA, Humen DP, Teo KK. Reliability and validity of measures of cardiac output during incremental to maximal aerobic exercise. Part I: Conventional techniques. Sports Med 1999a;27(1):23-41.
  • Warburton DE, Haykowsky MJ, Quinney HA, Humen DP, Teo KK. Reliability and validity of measures of cardiac output during incremental to maximal aerobic exercise. Part II: Novel techniques and new advances. Sports Med 1999b;27(4):241-60.
  • Warburton DE, McKenzie DC, Haykowsky MJ, Taylor A, Shoemaker P, Ignaszewski AP, et al. Effectiveness of high-intensity interval training for the rehabilitation of patients with coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 2005;95(9):1080-1084.
  • Warburton DE, Nicol C, Bredin SS. Health benefits of physical activity: the evidence. Cmaj 2006a;174(6):801-9.
  • Warburton DE, Nicol CW, Bredin SS. Health benefits of physical activity: the evidence. Cmaj 2006b;174(6):801-9.
  • Warburton DE, Nicol CW, Bredin SS. Prescribing exercise as preventive therapy. Cmaj 2006c;174(7):961-74.
  • Warburton DER, Eng JJ, Krassioukov A, Sproule S, the SCIRE Research Team. Cardiovascular health and exercise rehabilitation in spinal cord injury. Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation 2007b;13(1):98-122.
  • Wecht JM, de Meersman RE, Weir JP, Bauman WA, Grimm DR. Effects of autonomic disruption and inactivity on venous vascular function. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2000;278(2):H515-20.
  • Wecht JM, De Meersman RE, Weir JP, Spungen AM, Bauman WA. Cardiac homeostasis is independent of calf venous compliance in subjects with paraplegia. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2003;284(6):H2393-9.
  • Wheeler GD, Andrews B, Lederer R, Davoodi R, Natho K, Weiss C, et al. Functional electric stimulation-assisted rowing: Increasing cardiovascular fitness through functional electric stimulation rowing training in persons with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83(8):1093-9.
  • Whiteneck GG, Charlifue SW, Frankel HL, Fraser MH, Gardner BP, Gerhart KA, et al. Mortality, morbidity, and psychosocial outcomes of persons spinal cord injured more than 20 years ago. Paraplegia 1992;30(9):617-30.
  • Yekutiel M, Brooks ME, Ohry A, Yarom J, Carel R. The prevalence of hypertension, ischaemic heart disease and diabetes in traumatic spinal cord injured patients and amputees. Paraplegia 1989;27(1):58-62.
  • Zbogar D, Eng JJ, Krassioukov AV, Scott JM, Esch BT, Warburton DE. The effects of functional electrical stimulation leg cycle ergometry training on arterial compliance in individuals with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2008;46(11):722-6.

Costs

Depression

Psychological adjustment to catastrophic injuries and illnesses is a topic of much interest for practitioners providing clinical rehabilitation services. This chapter attempts to summarize evidence garnered from SCI research that has investigated the treatment of post-SCI depression and depressive symptoms potentially affecting successful adjustment to SCI.  Though limited, these findings can assist in developing a foundation for evidence-based practice, and hopefully lead to improved and more consistent care.  It should be emphasized, however, that evidence-based practice constitutes more than the routine use of treatments supported by the best research evidence available.  Such practice also necessitates that the practitioner employ his or her clinical judgment in determining the applicability of such research conclusions to the treatment provided each patient (APA 2005). 

Concerns regarding “depression” are commonly reported by SCI survivors, staff, or their families.  Indeed, Elliott & Umlauf (1995) report that depression is the most frequently researched psychological issue in individuals who have sustained a SCI.  Given the losses and innumerable adjustments necessitated following a SCI, an individual will likely encounter repeated strains upon available coping resources. The emergence of depressive symptoms is not then a surprising outcome of such challenges (Kemp et al. 2004) and some early investigators have described it as an “inevitable” outcome (e.g. Hohmann 1975).   Of added concern, rates of suicide average approximately 3 to 5 times that reported in the general population (e.g. DeVivo et al. 1991; Charlifue & Gerhart 1991; Hartkopp et al. 1998) and stand in contrast to the reductions achieved in other preventable causes of death following SCI (e.g. septicemia, respiratory illness, diseases of the urinary system) (Soden et al. 2000).  The many consequences of SCI pose multiple stressors for families (e.g., 15% of caregivers reported symptoms consistent with Major Depressive Disorder) (Dreer et al. 2007) and can also result in emotional challenges for rehabilitation staff (North 1999).

The term “depressed mood” refers to a state of dysphoria that occurs routinely and is considered a normal process (Elliott & Frank 1996).  In contrast, a diagnosable “depressive syndrome” refers to a constellation of observable affective, cognitive and neuro-vegetative symptoms of sufficient frequency and severity to negatively impact the functioning of an individual.  The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (APA 2000) is a frequently cited classification system for establishing diagnoses of various depressive and other mental disorders. According to the DSM-IV-TR5, depression is not a single entity, but instead represents a range of disorders which are classified according to symptom type, number, severity, duration and functional impact.   Adiagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder in an adult requires at least a two-week period of five or more symptoms, with at least one either depressed mood or a loss of interest or pleasure in almost all activities.  Further symptoms may include:

Symptoms together must result in impairment in functioning (social, occupational or other) and are not due to the direct physiological effects of a substance or medical condition.  The classification of affective symptoms continues to be revised with the next edition (DSM-V) anticipated for 2013.  As an example, a mixed anxiety and depressive disorder is proposed when anxiety and depression are both present, but neither set of symptoms, considered separately is sufficient to justify a diagnosis (APA, 2010).

Identifying clinical depression is often more difficult than might be anticipated.  Rehabilitation staff has been shown to overestimate the incidence of depression in inpatient populations (Cushman & Dijkers 1990) while underestimating patients’ reported coping ability and mental health (Siosteen et al. 2005). Similarly, the life satisfaction and well-being of persons in the community with complete tetraplegic injuries (including those who required ventilator support) was shown to be underestimated by health care professionals (Bach & Tilton 1994).  Conversely, Kemp and Mosqueda (2004) caution that symptoms of depression can be overlooked or misidentified in people with disabilities. 

Various methodological issues have “served to constrain” the study of depression in the SCI population (Elliott & Frank 1996).  The use of ambiguous definitions and the unclear or inconsistent use of diagnostic criteria are two of many such challenges.  Others issues include a lack of theoretical models, selection biases, limited longitudinal studies and ethical concerns that limit more rigorous experimental designs. 

How best should the occurrence of depression be viewed in the process of adjustment to SCI?  Anecdotal models of adjustment have incorporated the “clinical lore” that depression was to be universally anticipated soon after injury (Elliott & Kennedy 2004), and demonstrating the individual’s rational acceptance of the permanence of the injury and associated losses (Frank et al. 1985). Taken further, those individuals who do not evidence depression were considered to be in “denial” and potentially vulnerable to a more precarious adjustment (e.g. Siller 1969).  Accordingly, it had been also proposed that depression be induced to encourage appropriate grieving (Nemiah 1957).  More recently, both the universality and the benefits of depression in the adjustment process have been questioned by numerous investigative findings (e.g. Howell et al. 1981; Judd et al. 1986).  Given the many negative outcomes associated with depression post injury (e.g. longer hospitalization, decreased longevity, increased rates of suicide, reduced health, daily functioning, limited community participation) it is likely best viewed as a secondary complication or sequelae rather than an adaptive process facilitating overall emotional adjustment  (Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine 1998).

Kemp et al. (2004) noted that depression is not simply a necessary consequence of sustaining a SCI – not all who sustain a SCI become depressed.  Tirch et al. (1999) studied depressive symptoms in 11 pairs of monozygotic twins where one of the pair had sustained a SCI.  The SCI and non-SCI co-twins did not differ significantly in their self-reports, lending additional support to the view that SCI does not inevitably lead to increased depression.  Further, there is little relationship between depression and the level of SCI or the completeness of the lesion (Kemp et al. 2004).  As an example, Hall et al. (1999) sampled 82 individuals with C1-4 quadriplegia between 14 and 24 years post injury, and these individuals reported their self-esteem and quality of life to be high – with 95% feeling they were “glad to be alive”. 

Depression post-SCI can be a function of difficulties coping with the multiple environmental, social and health-related problems that follow.  If depression is not inevitable following SCI, then it is noteworthy that depression is related to modifiable factors that play a role in its development and maintenance (Kemp et al. 2004). In a summary of the adjustment literature, Elliott and Rivera (2003) described a model determining psychological well being and physical health post-SCI.  The components include demographics, injury characteristics, preinjury behaviours and psychopathology, personality factors, social/environmental factors and styles of appraisals.  The authors highlight how the consequences of physical disability exist within a larger context and that changes in public and health policies can dramatically impact post-injury quality of life.

Orenczuk S, Slivinski J, Mehta S, Teasell RW (2010). Depression Following Spinal Cord Injury. In Eng JJ, Teasell RW, Miller WC, Wolfe DL, Townson AF, Hsieh JTC, Connolly SJ, Mehta S, Sakakibara BM, editors. Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Evidence. Version 3.0.

Prevalence of Depression Post-SCI

Estimates of the prevalence of depression are affected by the nature of the measures used, how depression is defined, aging characteristics of the samples studied and when symptoms are assessed post-injury (Elliott & Frank 1996)  The common research practice of employing self-report measures is both convenient and cost-effective.  However, the resulting prevalence rates may reflect subjective anxiety and overall distress rather than symptoms specific to depression, per se.  In clinical practice, self-report measures may serve to alert the clinician to the need for additional evaluation and can aid in monitoring symptom severity over time.  For reviews of depression and other psychosocial measures frequently used in spinal injury research and practice see Vahle et al. (2000), Richards et al. (2006), SCIRE chapter 25.and Sakakibara et al. (2009).

In their review, Bombardier et al. (2004) found rates of major depression or probable major depression following SCI vary widely across studies and can range from 7% to 31% of persons, with estimates of major depressive disorder typically reported in 15%-23% of individuals. In a recent survey of 568 adult traumatic SCI inpatient rehabilitation clients, approximately 22% met self reported symptoms consistent with major depressive disorder on average less than two months post injury (Krause, Bombardier and Carter, 2008). Bombardier et al. (2004) surveyed 849 SCI outpatients at one-year post injury and found 11.4% met criteria for MDD. Krause et al. (2000) suggest a 42% overall rate of depression with a 21% probable rate of major depression – indicative of a 4-fold increase of depressive disorders among individuals with SCI when compared with samples of non-disabled individuals.  Of note, many studies do not include information regarding use of antidepressants, other medications, or psychotherapeutic interventions in their reports.  Accordingly, observed rates of depressive symptoms may potentially be a reflection of multiple additional factors and the “net effect of all treatments” (Krause et al.  2008).

With up to 25% of men and 47% of women affected (Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine 1998) a recent case-matched comparison found an absence of gender differences in probable major depression and symptom severity (Kalpakjian and Albright 2006). In an Italian sample averaging 6 years post-SCI, Scivoletto et al. (1997) found 16% reported significant symptoms of depression and 13% anxiety.  Migliorini et al. (2008) employed an Australian sample who averaged 19 years post-SCI, 37% were identified as depressed, 30% suffered anxiety, 25% experienced significant stress and 8.4% reported post-traumatic stress disorder.  Of note, approximately 60% of individuals with one probable diagnosis were likely to suffer at least one other comorbid condition highlighting the potential complexity of mental health issues. 

In a 6-year follow-up study of 233 Albertans with SCI, 28.9% were treated for depression following their traumatic SCIs, with approximately 59% of these individuals beginning treatment during their initial hospitalization (both acute and rehabilitation admissions). An additional 10% of people were treated during the remainder of the first year.  This exceeded depression treatment rates reported in able-bodied controls of approximately 11% (Dryden et al. 2004), with those at highest risk reporting permanent neurological deficit, a preinjury history of depression, or substance abuse (Dryden et al. 2005).  Kennedy and Rogers (2000) reported that anxiety, depression and hopelessness gradually increased beginning at week 30 post injury and continued until discharge from rehabilitation (week 48).  At that point 60% of SCI clients scored above a clinical cut-off for depression (i.e. Beck Depression Inventory).  Krause et al. 2008 suggested that depressive symptoms may not peak during inpatient rehabilitation and it may take additional time for the “low point of emotional adaptation to appear”.

In a cross sectional study, Richardson and Richards (2008) found that rates of clinically significant depressive symptoms (PHQ-9 scores >10) were reported by approximately 21%, 18%, 12% and 12% of SCI survivors surveyed at 1, 5, 15 and 25 years post injury, suggesting rates tended to decrease with time since injury.  Data obtained in earlier studies also suggested that in newly injured persons who met criteria for major and minor depression, many remit within 3 months of onset (Kishi et al. 1994) and that the frequency of reported problems decreases over the first year (Richards 1986).  In a longitudinal analysis, Pollard and Kennedy (2007) found a substantial relationship between reported depressive symptoms at 3 months and approximately a decade post injury, with 38% and 35% of SCI survivors surveyed meeting a criterion for moderate depression at these times.  Hoffman et al. (2008) followed 411 SCI model system participants and found approximately 20% of at 1 year post injury and 18% at year 5 post-injury reported symptoms consistent with major depression.  Further, approximately a third of those reporting scores suggestive of moderate depression at year 1 experienced remission, while approximately 9% were newly depressed at year 5.  The authors summarized that the natural history of depression post SCI was variable over time with some showing improvement while others exhibited emotional decline. 

It has been questioned whether, despite its reported prevalence, efforts to improve the detection and treatment of depression in individuals with SCI has improved (Bombardier et al. 2004). In an editorial comment, Faber (2005) expressed concern that given possible underestimates, about half of all persons hospitalized for traumatic SCI may benefit from treatment for depression.  Similarly, while a substantial percentage of their SCI clinic sample reported symptoms suggestive of major depression, Kemp and Krause (1999) found that none were receiving treatment (psychotherapy or medications).  In a review of American veterans with spinal cord injuries and disabilities, Smith et al. (2007) concluded that many may not be receiving adequate treatment for depression and the authors encouraged more aggressive screening and treatment.   

As health problems can produce pain, fatigue, sleep disturbances, physical sensations and digestive troubles, the overlap of somatic symptoms can pose diagnostic challenges.  Krause, Bombardier and Carter (2008) noted that on average, nearly a third of a large sample of SCI adult inpatient rehabilitation clients cited sleep, energy and appetite changes, while symptoms of persistent depressed mood and anhedonia were reported by approximately 10% and 15% of the sample, respectively.  In a large outpatient sample, 80% of SCI survivors with probable MDD reported symptoms of depressed mood, anhedonia, feelings of failure, disturbed sleep and decreased energy (Bombardier et al. 2004).  In general, despite the potential for an increase in “false positives”, reports of somatic symptoms merit clinician review given their strong association with affective or more general symptoms of depression (Richardson and Richards, 2008; Krause et al. 2008). 

Conclusions

  • While not universal, for many persons with spinal cord injury, depression can be a complication that poses a significant impediment to their functioning and adaptation.
  • Identifying depression can be difficult, but is most likely to develop during the initial year post-injury. Though many will experience a remission of symptoms over time, for others depressive symptoms may persist for many years, 
  • Self-report measures of depression should be viewed as screening tools to alert the clinician to arrange a more thorough evaluation.  In addition to affective symptoms, endorsement of somatic symptoms (e.g. sleep disturbance, poor energy and appetite disturbance) during inpatient or outpatient contact merits clinical review to clarify possible mechanisms underlying their emergence. 
  • Depression is a common consequence of SCI.
  • Depression post SCI can interfere with function and adaptation.

Interventions for Treatment of Depression following SCI

The American Psychological Association (APA 2005) states that evidence-based practice involves the integration of the best of existing research with clinical expertise and the reality of the patient’s needs and wishes. Practical and ethical concerns may limit the availability of SCI research evidence.

Difficulties inherent in conducting intervention studies are numerous (King & Kennedy 1999).  The SCI population can be heterogeneous.  Most sites do not have access to a large number of patients and obtaining treatment and appropriate control groups requires the participation of multiple sites.  Also, ethical concerns over providing the best possible care to all SCI patients are obvious, so that withholding aspects of treatment in order to establish control conditions is no longer acceptable (e.g. Kahan et al. 2006).   To date, research strategies have frequently used self-report screening measures (e.g. Beck Depression Inventory, Zung Depression Inventory, Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Center for Epidemiological Studies – Depression Scale; Older Adult Health and Mood Questionnaire; Depression, Anxiety and Distress Scale), and while they offer many benefits (e.g. low cost, quick, easy to complete), they require further evaluation to support a diagnosis of depression. 

Typical SCI interventions to encourage post-SCI adjustment are often multi-faceted; thereby posing difficulties in identifying which combination of components can offer optimal care for any particular patient.  Further, psychosocial interventions cannot be independent of other aspects of care (e.g. medical, rehabilitation). Wait-list control conditions do not address personal contact, attention and perceived support available in intervention conditions.  In addition, many pre-morbid psychological and historical influences are very difficult to determine. 

As the nature of SCI studies make it more difficult to limit certain biases, the validity and generalizability of the findings is less clear.  Despite these challenges, researchers have made invaluable clinical contributions using smaller groups, non-randomized control groups, or controls chosen from historical data.  However, in summarizing the limited research currently available, Elliott and Kennedy (2004) suggested “we have many untested assumptions regarding the available treatments for depression among persons with SCI” and have questioned whether the current “glaring lack of intervention data” reflects a lack of interest on the part of consumers, researchers and funding agencies with regard to various interventions for treatment of depression in those with SCI.  Kahan et al. (2006) stressed that treatment of depression in people aging with a disability is “far from being developed”, noting a “massive dearth” of research of any kind for individuals with disabilities.

Psychological Interventions

Cognitive Behavioural Therapy

In the SCI population, the application of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) approaches to aid in the management of anxiety and depression is described as a prudent choice given its demonstrated effectiveness in a wide range of disorders (Craig et al. 1997).  CBT strategies can include addressing “irrational” or negative thoughts, increasing opportunities for participating in rewarding activities, and instruction in relaxation, among others.  Within this context, issues of assertiveness, social skills and discussions of sexuality have also at times been included to address the unique concerns of SCI individuals.  Employing a group setting to provide CBT can also be a cost effective opportunity for peer support, practice of social skills and the opportunity for gaining additional viewpoints.  Several authors have described the effects of group CBT interventions for individuals following SCI to reduce psychological distress and/or provide “immunization” against future difficulties.

Table 1 Cognitive Behavioural Therapy Group Interventions

Discussion 

In Australia, Craig et al. reported several studies (1997, 1998a, 1998b, 1999) employing a 10 week CBT-based group treatment format involving newly injured SCI rehabilitation inpatients with permanent injuries. They developed a CBT-based treatment protocol implemented by a psychologist and an occupational therapist.  Treatment groups consisted of 4-5 individuals and sessions approximated 1.5 to 2 hours weekly. A matched control group of SCI patients received traditional rehabilitation services. Measures of depression, anxiety and self-esteem were completed when individuals were no longer immobilized in bed, after conclusion of therapy (3 months post injury) and at one year post injury.  Prior to treatment, the treatment group reported greater self-esteem than did control, but did not differ on other outcome measures.  Anxiety did not change over time. Both treatment and control groups reported fewer symptoms of depression at 12 months post injury.  Taking into account pretreatment group differences in self-esteem, there was no significant improvement over time for either group.  Given that neither group had high levels of depressive mood before treatment, a further analysis of those with elevated scores on depression revealed that the mean score for the treatment group (n= 10) showed improvement after treatment and further gains one year later.  Controls (n = 12) who were moderately to severely depressed initially remained at these levels over the year.  Patients with initially high levels of anxiety (in either condition) showed decreases in symptoms over the year, with a trend for those in the treatment group to improve more so than did those in the control group.  CBT did not significantly impact upon self-esteem in individuals with recent onset SCI.  The authors conclude that clinicians servicing SCI rehabilitation wards should evaluate individuals soon after admission to identify those with high levels of depression and/or anxiety and then recommend CBT.   Further, not all persons with SCI are depressed, anxious or low in self-esteem, and may not require intervention.

In a follow-up report, Craig et al. (1998a) surveyed a subset of the SCI CBT treatment group participants and SCI controls (noted above) at 24 months post injury.  Group differences were not significant for measures of depression and anxiety.  At 1 and 2 years post injury, subjects were less depressed but levels of anxiety were essentially unchanged.  For those subjects with elevated depressive symptoms prior to treatment, levels of depression over the long term were lower for the treatment than the control group. Differences over time were also noted, with the short-term improvements in the depressive symptoms of the treatment group maintained over the two-year period.  In contrast, controls did not show improvement in the short term and were only slightly improved after 1 to 2 years.  Interestingly, the authors report that none of the treatment group had sought further treatment for depression between the 12 and 24-month period.  Both groups became less anxious over time.  The small number of subjects precluded identification of significance, but an inspection of the data revealed that the treatment group lowered their elevated anxiety scores to within the normal range at two years, while the control subjects’ scores averaged approximately one standard deviation above general population norms.  The authors conclude that not all individuals with recent onset SCI require specialized psychological intervention.  For those with elevated levels of reported depression and anxiety, these symptoms hypothetically could return to normal levels in the absence of intervention. However, such improvements could require a protracted period and result in both increased health costs and a diminished quality of life.  This study further suggests the merits of screening and ongoing benefits of an intervention program.

In a related study, Craig et al. (1998b) used the Locus of Control Behaviour Scale (LCB) to assess subjects’ perceptions that circumstances were within or beyond their control.  No treatment differences were found when comparing SCI CBT group participants and controls over a two-year post injury period.  Both groups averaged scores in the range suggestive of a more internal rather than external orientation.  When subjects with scores suggestive of an external locus of control scores were identified (9 treatment subjects and 16 controls), the treatment group showed a significant reduction in externality over time while controls did not. The finding supports the conclusion that CBT was effective for those in the treatment group who perceived living with a SCI (and related concerns) to be out of their control.  Associations of locus of control scores and depressive mood (Beck Depression Inventory) almost all reached significance for the control group when assessed pre treatment, post treatment, and at one and two year intervals.  In contrast, no associations were evident between LCB scores and reports of depressive symptoms in SCI treatment subjects, even for those who were external in their perceptions prior to participation in the CBT group.  The authors speculated that CBT “positively interfered in the determination of depressive mood”.  While there may be a substantial group at risk for developing psychological difficulties following spinal cord injury, the majority did not show problematic levels of externality and helplessness.  As such, the authors concluded that CBT for all SCI survivors is costly and unnecessary.       

Craig et al. (1999) continued a long term (2 years post injury) assessment of persons with SCI who previously participated in a non-randomized longitudinal controlled trial of CBT during their inpatient admission to a rehabilitation ward (1991-1992).  These responses were compared with those of control subjects who received only traditional rehabilitation services during their hospital stay.  Treatment subjects indicated 15% fewer hospital readmissions, 25% less drug use and much more often reported a positive adjustment than did controls.  Of concern, approximately 40% of controls frequently used drugs.  Forty three percent of controls reported that they had not adjusted well, while only one treatment subject held a similar view.  Neither group reported the occurrence of suicide over the two years. Self-reports of adjustment were negatively correlated with Beck Depression Scale scores.  The groups did not differ in the frequency of relationship breakups, with the majority of those married at the time of injury remaining so at two years.  Further, about half who were unmarried had formed new relationships.  The findings again are seen as suggesting benefits of CBT group treatment in encouraging positive adjustment following SCI. 

Two studies conducted at the National Spinal Cord Injuries Centre (NSCIC) in the UK investigated group Coping Effectiveness Training (CET). CET includes CBT, didactic, and practical elements. The first (King & Kennedy 1999) was a pilot study of CET, and the second (Kennedy et al. 2003) continued the work with additional subjects and measures. Both studies used matched historic controls from the NSCIC database, although there did remain some significant pre-intervention differences between groups. Results suggest that their intervention package produced a number of positive changes, including less depression and anxiety, less use of alcohol, and more positive self-perception. Participants said that they found the sharing of views and experiences and reviews of “real life” scenarios to be most valuable aspects of the group.

In an RCT conducted by Duchnick et al. (2010), 41 individuals from an inpatient rehabilitation hospital were randomized into either a CET group or supportive group therapy (SGT).  The SGT group received minimal structure and skills training compared to the CET group.  Both groups were led by two doctoral level psychologists with SCI rehabilitation experience.  Sessions were 1 hour each week for the duration of their inpatient rehabilitation (8-12 weeks).  No significant difference was initially evident at baseline in the Center of Epidemiologic Studies of Depression Scale (CESD) and State Anxiety Inventory (SAI) scores between the two groups.  Both groups showed significant improvement in depression and anxiety scores at discharge (p<0.05).  However, both depression and anxiety scores at 3 month follow-up had returned to initial levels.

In a level 2 study Norrbrink Budhet al. (2006) investigated the effects of an outpatient comprehensive pain management program for individuals with SCI and neuropathic pain.  The intervention group received education, CBT, relaxation and body awareness training totaling five hours weekly over a 10 week period while matched controls received no treatment. At 1 year follow up, the sign test showed no significant change in depression and anxiety levels (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)) in the treatment group from baseline. However, the treatment group showed a systematic decrease in anxiety and depression as measured by relative change in position (95% confidence interval) at one year follow up. Depression also decreased systematically in the treatment group compared to the control group at 1 year follow up; however, the sign test showed no significant change.   Reported levels of pain intensity, health related quality of life and life satisfaction did not differ between groups or over time.

Dorstyn et al. 2010 conducted a small prospective controlled trial to examine the effectiveness of CBT on the mood of individuals with SCI.  In the study, those with subclinical DASS-21 scores were assigned to the control group, while patients with moderate to severe scores were offered individual CBT treatment for a range of 7 to 22 sessions (30-60mins each).  Low dose amitriptyline was prescribed for a subset of the treatment group to help manage their distress while several control participants were similarly medicated for neuropathic pain.  The authors found mood had no effect on the functional outcome of patients at admission or discharge.  In the treatment group, the total DASS-21 scores did not change significantly over the treatment course; however depression, anxiety and stress subscale scores were found to decrease significantly post intervention and then increase significantly at 3 month follow-up post discharge.  The control groups’ remained stable over the period of investigation.  At 3 month follow-up, 78% of individuals in the treatment group met clinical levels of “caseness” on 1 or more clinical subscales while only 1 individual in the control group met these criteria.

Conclusion

  • There is level 2 evidence from 6 studies to supporting the use of small group CBT based treatment packages to decrease depressive symptoms following SCI. 
  • Follow up findings (up to 1 year post treatment) showed maintenance of affective improvement in 4 level 2 studies.  Conversely, evidence from 2 level 2 studies found that post intervention reduction of depressive symptoms were not sustained at follow up (up to 1 year). 
  • One level 2 study did not identify significant improvement in depressive symptoms.
  • Cognitive behavioural interventions provided in a group setting appear helpful in reducing post-SCI depression and related difficulties.

Combined Psychotherapy and Pharmacotherapy for Treatment of Depression in SCI

Several case series studies have reported positive results using pharmacotherapy for depression in SCI individuals (e.g. amitriptyline (Kim et al. 1977; Fullerton et al. 1981) mianserin and nomifensine (; Judd et al. 1986); tetracyclic and tricyclic antidepressants (Judd et al. 1989)).  Though reports of depressive symptoms were infrequent, Osteraker and Levi (2005) note that 25% and 30% of an inpatient Swedish SCI rehabilitation sample were prescribed antidepressants at admission and discharge, respectively.  In an electronic record review of over 17,000 veterans with “SCI and disorders” who sought inpatient or outpatient services during a three year period, Smith et al. (2007) noted that 22% had at least one encounter with a diagnosis of “depression”.  The majority of these depressed individuals (72%) received antidepressant therapies, typically a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) - most often sertraline.  In a Canadian centre, approximately a third of traumatic spinal cord injured individuals and approximately 40% of those with non-traumatic spinal cord injuries received antidepressant therapy during inpatient rehabilitation in addition to other counseling and therapeutic services (2006-2008) (J. Conlon, personal communication, December 16, 2008).

Overall, support for pharmacological treatment of depression in individuals with SCI is largely an extrapolation from the extant literature concerning use in the general population and comparative trials of medications and cognitive behavioural interventions are “sorely needed” (Elliott & Kennedy 2004).

Table 2 Combined Psychotherapy and Pharmacotherapy for Treatment of Depression in SCI

Discussion 

Kemp et al. (2004) used a pre-post treatment design to assure access to services and avoid ethical concerns that might arise in a randomized trial.  A total of 43 community living adult SCI survivors were identified as depressed using the Older Adult Health and Mood Questionnaire and confirmed by clinical interview.  Citing distance problems, 15 subjects subsequently declined participation but served as a “quasi-control” group.  The 28 remaining subjects began a combined 6-month trial of antidepressant medications and individual cognitive behavioural psychotherapy.  The participants were somewhat older but did not differ from non-participants in terms of level of injury, gender, or race/ethnicity.  Medications employed included SSRI and tricyclic antidepressants.  A clinical psychologist provided psychotherapy that included education regarding the signs, symptoms and consequences of depression, cognitive restructuring, problem solving and encouraging greater community involvement (average of 14 sessions).  During the treatment trial, four subjects discontinued their medications, one discontinued psychotherapy and three developed medical complications. When these eight subjects were excluded, all of the remaining 20 subjects improved, no longer meeting criteria scores for major depression (12 appeared mildly depressed and eight appeared non-depressed).  Their participation in community activities doubled over the 24 weeks, while life satisfaction showed improvement, primarily during the final 16 weeks of the program.  The average depression score for non-treated subjects did not change significantly over a 24-month follow-up period and suggests that untreated depression can become a chronic disorder. 

In a subsequent investigation combining a reanalysis of previous SCI participant data (40 of 43 were presented in above study) and an expansion to include 36 community dwellers with polio, cerebral palsy, stroke, rheumatoid arthritis, or other impairments, Kahan et al. (2006) explored the effects of a 6 month program of CBT and antidepressant therapy in an adult sample reporting major depression (54 received treatment and 22 no treatment).  A pre-post treatment design was employed to assure access to services and avoid ethical concerns that might arise in a randomized trial.  A clinical psychologist provided psychotherapy that included education regarding the signs, symptoms and consequences of depression, cognitive restructuring, problem solving and encouraging greater community involvement (average of 8 sessions; ranging from 4 to 17).  Most commonly used were SSRIs (18 participants) while 7 took tricyclic antidepressants.

On average, depression scores declined 50% over the course of treatment.  Seventy six percent improved to a less severe category of depression, while 24% remained unchanged. Of those who improved, approximately 30% no longer were classified as depressed.  Of those who reported continued major depression despite treatment, they showed a decrease in the number of symptoms reported.  In contrast, approximately a third of the no-treatment group improved, over half remained unchanged, and the remainder became worse.   While the small sample sizes precluded statistical analysis, a pattern of improvement across disability subgroups was apparent.   Benefits of treatment were significant by approximately 10 weeks.

The authors conclude that community dwelling individuals who have long term impairments and report depression can derive benefit from a combined intervention, with six months of treatment suggested as a minimum standard.  The frequency of participation in community activities was specifically targeted and doubled over the course of treatment.  Further, reported life satisfaction also improved, despite persistent dissatisfaction in physical status.  

Furthermore, In two pre-post studies, Judd et al. (1989; 1986) also found improvement in inpatients’ BDI and anxiety levels post pharmacological and psychological treatment.  Fullerton et al. (1981) interviewed 30 SCI rehabilitation patients using the SADS and identified nine as depressed. While three initiated treatment with amitriptyline, one patient responded and side effects required the intervention be discontinued in the remaining two. Depression was reported to have remitted in all patients at time of discharge (average 12 weeks).

Conclusion

  • Evidence of the benefits of pharmacotherapy alone and in combination with individual psychotherapy in the treatment of depressive symptoms in individuals with SCI is encouraging, although support is largely from investigations in other populations.
  • There is level 4 evidence from four non-RCT studies indicating the effectiveness of pharmacotherapy combined with cognitive behavioral psychotherapy for treatment of depression in SCI and other chronic disabling conditions.
  • The benefits of drug treatment for post-SCI depression are largely extrapolated from studies in non-SCI populations.

Exercise for Depression following SCI

Strategies to encourage health, reduce secondary complications and consequently support positive emotional adjustment following SCI have emerged as a source of increasing research interest.  As examples, the following studies review the impact of regular exercise upon various measures of physical health and emotional well-being.

Table 3 Exercise for Depression following SCI

Discussion

In a series of Canadian studies, Ginis et al. (2003), Hicks et al. (2003) and Latimer et al. (2004; 2005) reported RCT investigations of sedentary community dwelling SCI adult volunteers who participated in 3, and later 9 month trials of twice weekly, 60-90 minute sessions of stretching, aerobic arm ergometry and resistance exercises or a “wait” control condition who were asked to continue usual activities and refrain from beginning an exercise program.  Among other findings, Exercisers reported less stress, fewer depressive symptoms and greater satisfaction with physical functioning than did controls While the average frequency of depressive symptoms in the intervention group did not vary substantively over the 9 months (and remained below clinically significant levels), depressive symptoms in the control group increased and the average exceeded levels considered “at risk” for clinical depression.  The authors suggested the benefits of exercise as offering a prophylactic or stabilizing effect on pain – perhaps reducing the propensity for flare-ups, and the potential benefits of targeting sources of recurrent pain (i.e. shoulder pain).  Consistent with the Chronic Pain Process Model, a series of regression analyses the nine-month data revealed that changes in perceived pain mediated changes in stress, and the change in stress mediated a change in reported depression. It was recommended that clinicians prescribe exercise as a therapeutic modality for improving and maintaining well-being among people with SCI.

A Canadian pre-post study (Hicks et al. 2005) examined the effect of body weight supported treadmill training provided three times a week.  This study reported an increase in life satisfaction and physical function satisfaction after one year of exercise; however, there was no change in reports of depressive symptoms.

Two studies (Bradley et al. 1994; Guest et al. 1997), examined the effects of an electrically stimulated walking program on SCI individuals.  Bradley et al. (1994) in a cohort study, reported a significant increase in depression in participants with “unrealistic” expectations of their program.  In contrast, Guest et al. (1997) using a pre-post design, found a decrease in reported depression after completion of their study intervention.  Warms et al. (2004) reported no change in participant depression levels after six weeks of increased physical activity through a “Be Active in Life” intervention program.  A pre-post study (Kennedy et al. 2006), found an intensive 1-week residential program (Back Up) involving participation in recreational activities resulted in fewer symptoms of anxiety and depression.

Conclusion

  • Regular physical exercise may contribute to a reduction of pain, stress, and depression as well as potentially offering a prophylactic effect on sources of recurrent pain and in preventing a decline in quality of life following SCI. 
  • There is level 1 evidence from 2 RCTs and level 2 evidence from 1 RCT that exercise based programs reduced subjective pain, stress and resulting depressive symptoms.
  • There is level 1 evidence from 1 RCT and level 4 evidence from 1 pre-post study that exercise reduces depressive symptoms.
  • Level 2 evidence from 1 cohort study of individuals with unrealistic expectations report more depressive symptoms following an FES exercise program. 
  • Programs to encourage regular exercise, reduce stress, and improve or maintain health appear to have benefits in reducing reports of depressive symptoms in persons with SCI.

Other Treatments Depression following SCI

Table 4 Other Treatments for Depression following SCI

Discussion

Dunn et al. (2000) reported that veterans approaching 20 years post SCI with access to medical follow-upthrough a specialty comprehensive outpatient program reported better health, independence, and less depression than a demographically similar (civilian) group without access to follow-up care.  Neither group reported “depression” with sufficient frequency to earn it a top ten ranking from a list of 40 possible complications.  However, those without access to medical follow-up who did endorse depression considered it of sufficient intensity to rank it among the ten most severe problems.  While the types of secondary complications were similar, these were less frequent and less severe in those receiving health care.  Noting a variety of methodological concerns that limit conclusions and generalizability, the authors reported that their findings were consistent with those in other studies (involving SCI and other patient groups).

Zemper et al. (2003) examined a holistic wellness program for SCI patients. The intervention in this RCT study involved six group workshop sessions focused upon lifestyle management (including sexual health and stress management), physical activity, nutrition, and preventing secondary complications. It also included individual coaching sessions and follow-up phone calls. Assessments were completed at three times: prior to the series, two weeks following completion and four months later.  Results of this study pointed to improvements in awareness and behavior in areas of health practices, nutrition, and stress. Also secondary conditions were fewer and less serious. Reports of depression intensity decreased but did not reach significance.  Self-reports indicated improvements in physical activity, while more objective tests showed no improvement in physical fitness.

With a university clinic group of 20 outpatients with quadriplegic injuries, Diego et al. (2002) compared the effects of a 5-week massage therapy program to those of an independently performed exercise routine conducted over a similar period.  Subjects were stratified according to range of motion and then assigned to either of the two treatment groups.  While both groups averaged pretreatment depression scores approaching the clinically depressed range, only the massage therapy group showed a decrease in reported post treatment depression symptoms.  The massage therapy group also reported lower anxiety immediately after treatment on the first and last days of the protocol.  The authors suggested that the significant gains in upper limb muscle strength and wrist range of motion demonstrated by the massage therapy group may have contributed to their reported reduction in subjective distress

One RCT (Defrin et al. 2007) evaluated the effectiveness of transmagnetic stimulation (TMS) in reducing pain post-SCI.  This study found a significant decrease in depression in individuals treated with transmagnetic stimulation compared to those in the control group at time of follow-up 2-6 weeks post treatment.

Conclusion

  • There is level 2 evidence from 1 RCT suggesting a wellness and health promotion program did not significantly decrease intensity of depressive symptoms.
  • In 1 non-RCT, access to medical follow-up for individuals with SCI found reports of better health, independence, less depression and fewer secondary complications. 
  • There is level 1 evidence that massage therapy can reduce depressive symptoms
  • There level 1 evidence for the effectiveness of TMS in reducing depressive symptoms.
  • Several non-traditional approaches to SCI appear to offer improved health practices and a reduction in reported secondary conditions including depression.

Final Comments

This chapter has summarized research highlighting several promising approaches to the management of post-SCI depression. Additionally, their is also some evidence for the effectiveness of these approaches for related therapeutic targets such as anxiety and self-esteem. However, many of the studies cited note limitations that may introduce caution regarding the generalizability of conclusions to other samples and settings. These have included:

  • Small samples sizes and high rates of attrition (due to illness or other factors)
  • Possible selection biases
  • Ethical concerns that may preclude randomized designs
  • Multifaceted interventions complicate understanding of most relevant component(s)
  • Impact of social contact in the intervention group often not accounted for in “standard treatment” or “wait list” controls
  • Potential impact of adjunctive psychological interventions is unclear
  • Use of antidepressant medications not consistently reported
  • Lacking long term follow up
  • Variability of outcome measures limit comparisons across studies

When leavened with clinical judgment, this research offers preliminary empirical support to guide the practitioner in employing evidenced-based therapeutic strategies.  Future investigations, particularly those employing more stringent research designs, will continue to expand the options and confidence of clinical efforts to assist those individuals who have sustained spinal cord injuries. The reader is encouraged to also consider the following topic reviews of depression and SCI (Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine 1998; Elliott & Frank 1996; Elliott & Kennedy 2004) and also, more generally, a recent state of the science review of SCI rehabilitation (Sipski & Richards 2006).

Summary

  • While not universal, for many persons with spinal cord injury, depression can be a complication that poses a significant impediment to their functioning and adaptation.
  •  Identifying depression can be difficult, but is most likely to develop during the initial year post-injury. Though many will experience a remission of symptoms over time, for some individuals, depressive symptoms may persist for many years.  
  • Self-report measures of depression should be viewed as screening tools to alert the clinician to arrange a more thorough evaluation.  In addition to affective symptoms, endorsement of somatic symptoms (e.g. sleep disturbance, poor energy and appetite disturbance) during inpatient or outpatient contact merits clinical review to clarify possible mechanisms underlying their emergence.
  • There is level 2 evidence from 6 studies supporting the use of small group CBT based treatment packages to decrease depressive symptoms following SCI.
  • Follow up findings (up to 1 year post treatment) showed maintenance of affective improvement in 4 level 2 studies. Conversely, evidence from 2 level 2 studies found that post intervention reduction of depressive symptoms were not sustained at follow up (up to 1 year).
  • One level 2 study did not identify significant improvement in depressive symptoms.
  • Evidence of the benefits of pharmacotherapy alone and in combination with individual psychotherapy in the treatment of depressive symptoms individuals with SCI is encouraging, although support is largely from investigations in other populations.
  • There is level 4 evidence from four non-RCT studies indicating the effectiveness of pharmacotherapy combined with cognitive behavioral psychotherapy for treatment of depression in SCI and other chronic disabling conditions.
  • Regular physical exercise may contribute to a reduction of pain, stress, and depression as well as potentially offering a prophylactic effect on sources of recurrent pain and in preventing a decline in quality of life following SCI. 
  • There is level 1 evidence from 2 RCTs and level 2 evidence from 1 RCT that exercise based programs reduced subjective pain, stress and resulting depressive symptoms.
  • There is level 1 evidence from 1 RCT and level 4 evidence from 1 pre-post study that exercise reduces depressive symptoms.
  • Level 2 evidence from 1 cohort study of individuals with unrealistic expectations report more depressive symptoms following an FES exercise program.
  • There is level 2 evidence from 1 RCT suggesting a wellness and health promotion program did not significantly decrease intensity of depressive symptoms.
  • In 1 non-RCT, access to medical follow-up for individuals with SCI found reports of better health, independence, less depression and fewer secondary complications. 
  • There is level 1 evidence that massage therapy can reduce depressive symptoms
  • There level 1 evidence for the effectiveness of TMS in reducing depressive symptoms.

Key Points

  • Depression is a common consequence of SCI.
  • Depression post SCI can interfere with function and adaptation.
  • Cognitive behavioural interventions provided in a group setting appear helpful in reducing post-SCI depression and related difficulties.
  • The benefits of drug treatment for post-SCI depression are largely extrapolated from studies in non-SCI populations.
  • Programs to encourage regular exercise, reduce stress, and improve or maintain health appear to have benefits in reducing reports of depressive symptoms in persons with SCI.

References

  • American Psychiatrist Association. DSM-5 Development. http://www.dsm5.org/Pages/Default.aspx Accessed March 17, 2010
  • American Psychological Association. Policy statement on evidence-based practice in psychology. American Psychological Association Representatives Meeting, August 2005, http://www.apa.org/practice/ebpreport.pdf
  • Bach JR, Tilton MC. Life satisfaction and well-being measures in ventilator assisted individuals with traumatic tetraplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994;75(6):626-632.
  • Bombardier CH, Richards JS, Krause JS, Tulsky D, Tate DG. Symptoms of major depression in people with spinal cord injury: implications for screening. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:1749-1756.
  • Bradley MB. The effect of participating in a functional electrical stimulation exercise program on affect in people with spinal cord injuries. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 1994;75:676-9.
  • Charlifue SW, Gerhart KA. Behavioral and demographic predictors of suicide after traumatic spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1991;72:488-492.
  • Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine.1998. Depression following spinal cord injury: A clinical practice guideline for primary care physicians. Washington, DC: Paralyzed Veterans of America.
  • Craig AR, Hancock K, Chang E, Dickson H. Immunizing against depression and anxiety after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998a;79:375-377.
  • Craig A, Hancock K, Chang E, Dickson H. The effectiveness of group psychological intervention in enhancing perceptions of control following spinal cord injury. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 1998b;32:112-118.
  • Craig A, Hancock K, Dickson H. Improving the long-term adjustment of spinal cord injured persons. Spinal Cord 1999;37:345-350.
  • Craig AR, Hancock K, Dickson H, Chang E. Long-term psychological outcomes in spinal cord injured persons: results of a controlled trial using cognitive behavior therapy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997;78:33-38.
  • Cushman LA, Dijkers MP. Depressed mood in spinal cord injured patients: staff perceptions and patient realities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1990;71:191-196.
  • Defrin R, Grunhaus L, Zamir D, Zeilig G. The effect of a series of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulations of the motor cortex on central pain after spinal cord injury. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 2007;88:1574-80.
  • DeVivo MJ, Black KJ, Richards JS, Stover SL. Suicide following spinal cord injury. Paraplegia 1991;29:620-627.
  • Diego MA, Field T, Hernandez-Reif M, Hart S, Brucker B, Field T, et al. Spinal cord patients benefit from massage therapy. Int J Neurosci 2002;112:133-142.
  • Dorstyn DS, Mathias JL, Denson LA. Psychological intervention during spinal rehabilitation: a preliminary study. Spinal Cord Advance online publication 22 December 2009; doi: 10.1038/sc.2009.161
  • Dreer, L, Elliott, T. Shewchuk, R, Berry,J, Rivera P. Family caregivers of persons with spinal cord injury predicting caregivers at risk for probable depression. Rehabilitation Psychology 2007;52:351-357.
  • Dryden DM, Saunders LD, Rowe BH, May LA, Yiannakoulias N, Svenson LW, et al. Depression following traumatic spinal cord injury. Neuroepidemiology 2005;25:55-61.
  • Dryden DM, Saunders LD, Rowe BH, May LA, Yiannakoulias N, Svenson LW, et al. Utilization of health services following spinal cord injury: a 6-year follow-up study. Spinal Cord 2004;42:513-525.
  • Duchnick JJ, Letsch EA, Curtiss G. Coping effectiveness training during acute rehabilitation of spinal cord injury/dysfunction: a randomized clinical trial. Rehabilitation Psychology 2009;54:123-32.
  • Dunn M, Love L, Ravesloot C. Subjective health in spinal cord injury after outpatient healthcare follow-up. Spinal Cord 2000;38:84-91.
  • Eack S, Greeno C, Bong-Jae, L. Limitations of the Patient Health Questionnaire Identifying Anxiety and Depression in Community Mental Health: Many Cases are Undetected.  Research on Social Work Practice 2006;16:625-631.
  • Elliott TR, Frank RG. Depression following spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996;77(8):816-823.
  • Elliott TR, Kennedy P. Treatment of depression following spinal cord injury: An evidence-based review. Rehabil Psychol 2004;49:134-9.
  • Elliott TR & Rivera P. (2003). Spinal cord injury. In Nezu A., Maguth C., & Geller P. (Eds). Handbook of psychology: Health psychology, Vol. 9. (pp. 415-435). Hoboken, NJ, US: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  • Elliott TR, Shewchuck. Using the nominal group technique to identify the problems experienced by persons living with severe physical disabilities. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings 2002;9:65-76.
  • Elliott TR, Umlauf RL. (1995). Measurement of personality and psychopathology following acquired physical disability. In Cushman, LA., Scherer, MJ (Eds). Psychological assessment in medical rehabilitation. (pp. 325-358). Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association.
  • Faber RA. Depression and Spinal Cord Injury. Neuroepidemiology 2005;25:53-54.
  • Fullerton DT, Harvey RF, Klein MH, Howell T. Psychiatric disorders in patients with spinal cord injuries. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1981;38:1369-1371.
  • Ginis KAM, Latimer AE, McKechnie K, Ditor DS, McCartney N, Hicks AL, et al. Using exercise to enhance subjective well-being among people with spinal cord injury: the mediating influences of stress and pain. Rehabil Psychol 2003;48:157-164.
  • Graves,D.E. & Bombardier,C.H. Improving the efficiency of screening for major depression in people with spinal cord injury.  J.Spinal Cord Med 2008;31:177-184.
  • Guest RS, Klose KJ, Needham-Shropshire BM, Jacobs PL. Evaluation of a training program for persons with SCI paraplegia using the Parastep 1 ambulation system: part 4. Effect on physical self-concept and depression. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 1997;78:804-7.
  • Hall KM, Knudsen ST, Wright J, Charlifue SW, Graves DE, Werner P. Follow-up study of individuals with high tetraplegia (C1-C4) 14 to 24 years postinjury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80:1507-1513.
  • Hartkopp A, Bronnum-Hansen H, Seidenschnur AM, Biering-Sorensen F. Suicide in a spinal cord injured population: its relation to functional status. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998;79:1356-1361.
  • Hicks AL, Adams MM, Martin GK et al. Long-term body-weight-supported treadmill training and subsequent follow-up in persons with chronic SCI: effects on functional walking ability and measures of subjective well-being. Spinal Cord 2005;43:291-8.
  • Hicks AL, Martin KA, Ditor DS, Latimer AE, Craven C, Bugaresti J, et al. Long-term exercise training in persons with spinal cord injury: effects on strength, arm ergometry performance and psychological well-being. Spinal Cord 2003;41:34-43.
  • Hoffman,J.M., Bombardier,C.H., Graves,D.E., Kalpakjian,C.Z., and Krause,J.S. 2008. Natural history of major depression after spinal cord injury.  The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine 2008;31:236.
  • Hohmann GW. Psychological aspects of treatment and rehabilitation of the spinal cord injured person. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1975;112:81-88.
  • Howell T, Fullerton DT, Harvey RF, Klein M. Depression in spinal cord injured patients. Paraplegia 1981;19:284-288.
  • Judd FK, Burrows GD, Brown DJ. Depression following acute spinal cord injury. Paraplegia 1986;24:358-363.
  • Judd FK, Stone J, Webber JE, Brown DJ, Burrows GD. Depression following spinal cord injury. A prospective in-patient study. Br J Psychiatry 1989;154:668-671.
  • Kahan,J.S., Mitchell,J.M., Kemp,B.J., & Adkins,R.H. The results of a 6-month treatment for depression on symptoms, life, satisfaction, and community activities among individuals aging with a disability.  Rehabilitation Psychology 2006;51:13-22.
  • Kalpakjian,C.Z. & Albright,K.J. An examination of depression through the lens of spinal cord injury. Comparative prevalence rates and severity in women and men.  Womens Health Issues 2006;16:380-388.
  • Kemp BJ, Kahan JS, Krause JS, Adkins RH, Nava G. Treatment of major depression in individuals with spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med 2004;27:22-28.
  • Kemp BJ, Krause JS. Depression and life satisfaction among people ageing with post-polio and spinal cord injury. Disability and Rehabilitation 1999;21:241-249.
  • Kemp,B. & Mosqueda,L. (2004). Aging with a disability: What the clinician needs to know.  Boston: John Hopkins University Press.
  • Kennedy P, Duff J, Evans M, Beedie A. Coping effectiveness training reduces depression and anxiety following traumatic spinal cord injuries. Br J Clin Psychol 2003;42:41-52.
  • Kennedy P, Rogers B. Anxiety and Depression After Spinal Cord Injury: A longitudinal analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000;81:932-937.
  • Kennedy P, Taylor N, Hindson L. A pilot investigation of a psychosocial activity course for people with spinal cord injuries. Psychology Health & Medicine 2006;11:91-9.
  • Kim SP, Davis SW, Sell GH. Amitriptyline in severely depressed spinal cord-injured patients: rapidity of response. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1977;58:157-161.
  • King C, Kennedy P. Coping effectiveness training for people with spinal cord injury: preliminary results of a controlled trial. Br J Clin Psychol 1999;38:5-14.
  • Kishi Y, Robinson RG, Forrester AW. Prospective longitudinal study of depression following spinal cord injury. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 1994;6:237-244.
  • Krause JS, Carter RE, Pickelsimer EE, Wilson D. A prospective study of health and risk of mortality after spinal cord injury. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 2008;89:1482-91.
  • Krause JS, Kemp B, Coker J. Depression after spinal cord injury: relation to gender, ethnicity, aging, and socioeconomic indicators. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000;81:1099-1109.
  • Latimer AE, Ginis KA, Hicks AL, McCartney N. An examination of the mechanisms of exercise-induced change in psychological well-being among people with spinal cord injury. Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development 2004;41:643-52.
  • Latimer AE, Martin Ginis KA, Hicks AL, McCartney N. An examination of the mechanisms of exercise-induced change in psychological well-being among people with spinal cord injury. Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development 2004;41:643-651.
  • Migliorini,C., Tonge,B., and Taleporos,G. Spinal cord injury and mental health.  Aust.N.Z.J.Psychiatry 2008;42:309-314.
  • Nemiah JC. The psychiatrist and rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1957;38:143-147.
  • Norrbrink BC, Kowalski J, Lundeberg T. A comprehensive pain management programme comprising educational, cognitive and behavioural interventions for neuropathic pain following spinal cord injury. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 2006;38:172-80.
  • North,N.T. The psychological effects of spinal cord injury: a review.  Spinal Cord 1999;37: 671-679.
  • Osteraker,A.L. & Levi,R. Indicators of psychological distress in postacute spinal cord injured individuals.  Spinal Cord 2005;43:223-229.
  • Pollard,C. & Kennedy,P. A longitudinal analysis of emotional impact, coping strategies and post-traumatic psychological growth following spinal cord injury: a 10-year review.  Br.J.Health Psychol. 2007;12:347-362.
  • Richards JS. Psychologic adjustment to spinal cord injury during first postdischarge year. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1986;67:362-365.
  • Richards JS, Kogos SC, Richardson EJ. Psychosocial measures for clinical trials in spinal cord injury: quality of life, depression, and anxiety. Top spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 2006; 11: 24-35.
  • Sakakibara BM, Miller WC, Orenczuk SG, Wolfe DL the SCIRE Research Team. A systematic review of depression and anxiety measures used with individuals with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2009; 47:841-851.
  • Scivoletto G, Petrelli A, DiLucente L, Castellano V. Psychological Investigation of spinal cord patients. Spinal Cord 1997;35:516-520.
  • Siller J. Psychological situation of the disabled with spinal cord injuries. Rehabil Lit 1969;30:290-296.
  • Siosteen A, Kreuter M, Lampic C, Persson LO. Patient-staff agreement in the perception of spinal cord lesioned patients' problems, emotional well-being, and coping pattern. Spinal Cord 2005;43:179-186.
  • Sipski ML, Richards JS. Spinal cord injury rehabilitation: state of the science. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2006;85:310-342.
  • Smith,B.M., Weaver,F.M., & Ullrich,P.M. Prevalence of depression diagnoses and use of antidepressant medications by veterans with spinal cord injury.  Am J.Phys.Med Rehabil 2007;86:662-671.
  • Soden RJ, Walsh J, Middleton JW, Craven ML, Rutkowski SB, Yeo JD. Causes of death after spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2000;38:604-610.
  • Tirch D, Radnitz CL, Bauman WA. Depression and spinal cord injury: a monozygotic twin study. J Spinal Cord Med 1999;22:284-286.
  • Vahle VJ, Andresen EM, Hagglund KJ. Depression measures in outcomes research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000;81:S53-S62
  • Warms CA, Belza BL, Whitney JD, Mitchell PH, Stiens SA. Lifestyle physical activity for individuals with spinal cord injury: a pilot study. American Journal of Health Promotion 2004;18:288-91.
  • Zemper ED, Tate DG, Roller S, Forchheimer M, Chiodo A, Nelson VS, et al. Assessment of a holistic wellness program for persons with spinal cord injury. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2003;82:957-68.

Epidemiology

Introduction

Quantifying diseases or clinical conditions in populations is a core domain in Epidemiology. In addition, measuring health status can facilitate the understanding of the impact of healthcare management strategies and health policies, even though measures of health status cannot always be interpreted as health care performance according to the Wildavsky’s proposition of “medical care equals health” (Wildavsky 1977).

Measuring disease frequency in populations requires stipulation of diagnostic criteria or case definition. For the purpose of this review, traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) is defined as a lesion of traumatic nature within the spinal cord that results in the disruption of nerve fibre bundles that convey ascending sensory and descending motor information (Raineteau and Schwab 2001; Kraus et al. 1975).

Given the paucity of reviews on measures of frequency of traumatic SCI in populations, we sought to systematically review the literature with respect to the estimations of incidence, prevalence, and etiology of traumatic SCI in different countries worldwide and distinctive time periods. This review provides up to date knowledge of the global incidence and prevalence, and cause related data of traumatic SCI for clinical and policy comparisons.

The methods used for the development of this review expanded upon the traditional SCIRE methods (see SCIRE Methods). Specifically, we included only original articles that properly estimated incidence, prevalence, or causes of traumatic SCI among adults. Case reports, editorial articles and meeting abstracts were excluded.

Furlan JC, Krassioukov A, Miller WC, von Elm E (2010). Epidemiology of Traumatic SCI. In: Eng JJ, Teasell RW, Miller WC, Wolfe DL, Townson AF, Hsieh JTC, Connolly SJ, Mehta S, Sakakibara BM, editors. Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Evidence. Volume 3.0. Vancouver: p. 1-15.

Incidence and Prevalence of SCI by Continent and Country

The primary search yielded 1,538 article titles of which 69 were selected for a full article review. The secondary search captured 10 additional articles. Of those 79, 51 articles fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria for incidence studies (tables 1-4) and 9 articles were selected as adequate prevalence studies (table 5).

Incidence of SCI

Incidenceis the proportion of a group initially free of the condition that develops it over a given period of time. In our review, incidence is standardized as the number of cases of traumatic SCI per million inhabitants a year. Tables 1 to 4 present the incidence of traumatic SCI by geographic area.

Table 1a: Incidence rates in North America - Canada

Table 1b: Incidence rates in North America - USA

Table 2: Incidence rates in Europe

Table 3: Incidence Rates in Asia

Table 4: Incidence Rates in Oceania

Discussion

In North America, the incidence rate of traumatic SCI varied from 25 to 83 people per million inhabitants a year in the most recent studies. The vast majority of the studies are based on Canadian (n=4) or American data (n=14).

In Europe, the estimated incidence rate varied from 9.2 to 130.6 individuals with traumatic SCI per million inhabitants a year. This reflects the experience of several countries including Bulgaria, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Norway, Portugal, Romania, Spain, The Netherlands and Turkey.

In Asia, the incidence rate of traumatic SCI was reported between 14.6 and 174 persons per million inhabitants a year. While there were 4 Taiwanese studies and 3 Japanese studies, only 1 Russian and 1 Jordan’s study estimated incidence of traumatic SCI in other Asian countries.

In Oceania, the estimated incidence rate varied from 10 to 77 individuals with traumatic SCI per million inhabitants a year. There were 3 Australian studies, 2 articles from New Zealand and another one from Fiji.

Our search did not capture any study focused on incidence or prevalence in an African country.

Incidence time-related trends

Of the 53 articles on incidence, 9 previous studies provided estimated incidence rates of traumatic SCI in at least 2 different periods of time. While most of those studies suggest an increasing incidence of traumatic SCI over the last decades, only three articles reported a decreasing incidence in Taiwan and Australia.

Pickett et al. (2006) found that the incidence rate of traumatic SCI in London (Ontario, Canada) augmented from 21 to 49 people per million inhabitants a year between 1997 and 2000. Similarly, Starr-Bocian et al. (1991) reported that the SCI incidence in Colorado (USA) increased from 26.5 to 38.8 individuals per million inhabitants a year between 1986 and 1990. Based on a broader time series from Olmsted County (Minnesota, USA), Griffin and Opitz (1985) also found considerable increase in the SCI incidence rate from 22.2 people per million inhabitants a year between 1935 and 1994 to 70.8 people per million inhabitants a year between 1975 and 1981. In a Finnish study (Kannus et al. 2007), the incidence rate of traumatic SCI more than doubled (from 52 to 120 individuals per million inhabitants) between 1970 and 2004. Similarly, Maharaj (1996) documented a significant increase in the SCI incidence rate in Fiji from 5.6 to 17.9 people per million inhabitants a year between 1986 and 1991. In the most recent study, Hagen et al. documented an increase in the incidence rate of traumatic SCI from 6.2 to 26.3 individuals per million a year from 50s to 90s in the Western Norway.

Differently, Chen et al. (1997) reported a reduction in the SCI incidence rate in Taiwan from 24.5 to 17.2 individuals per million a year between 1993 and 1996. Yeo (1993) also found a decreasing incidence rate of traumatic SCI in New South Wales (Australia) from 21.6 people per million inhabitants a year in 1987 to 15.6 individuals per million inhabitants a year in 1992. Similarly, Knutsdittir reported a decrease in the incidence rate of traumatic SCI from 24 (in the 70s) to 18 people per million a year (in the 80s).

Prevalence of SCI

Prevalence is the proportion of a group of individuals having a clinical condition at a given point in time. In our review, prevalence is expressed as the number of cases of traumatic SCI per million population in a given year. Table 5 presents the prevalence of traumatic SCI by geographic area.

Table 5: Prevalence by Country

Discussion

Nine studies provided prevalence of traumatic SCI rates ranging from 50 to 906 cases per million population worldwide. In addition to regional differences with regard to the prevalence rates of traumatic SCI across the globe, there has been a trend towards increasing prevalence rates over the last decades.

In the United States, the estimated prevalence rates varied from 50 to 906 individuals with traumatic SCI per million. In Sweden and Finland, the prevalence rate of traumatic SCI was estimated to be 227 and 280 individuals per million, respectively. Based on data from Nepal and India, two Asian studies reported prevalence rates of traumatic SCI to be between 92.5 and 849.8 cases per million while in Australia, O’Connor et al. (2005) documented a prevalence rate of 681 individuals with traumatic SCI per million.

Our results also indicate that the prevalence rate of traumatic SCI has increased. Griffin and O’Fallon (1985) reported an increase in the prevalence rate of traumatic SCI in Olmsted County (Minnesota, USA) from 197 to 473 cases per million population between the 50s and 80s. Similarly, Lakhey et al. (2005) found an increase in the prevalence rates from 92.5 to 849.8 individuals with traumatic SCI per million in Dharan (Nepal) between 1997 and 2001.

Summary - Incidence and Prevalence

The results of our systematic review suggest a relatively broad variation of incidence and prevalence rates of traumatic SCI among distinctive geographic regions. While most of the prior studies indicated an increasing incidence of traumatic SCI over the last decades, a few reports suggest trends towards reduction of its incidence over the past years. Furthermore, prior studies (Griffin and Opitz1985; Starr-Bocian et al.1991; Maharaj 1996; Pickett et al.2003) consistently suggest increasing prevalence of traumatic SCI in the past few decades. While those differences can be partially attributed to methodological divergences or limitations, such as the use of national databases versus hospital databases or regional chart reviews or surveys. Discrepancies among the results can also be associated with country-related differences regarding social-economic-cultural factors, public health policies, and healthcare systems all of which can influence survival where the individual would be acknowledged as a death rather than an individual with SCI.

In our review, the European and Asian continents that have more heterogeneous populations showed a greater range of incidence rates in comparison with Oceania and Americas, which are essentially represented by Australia, Canada and United States. One may speculate that diversity of societies, economies, healthcare systems and public health policies in Europe and Asia amplifies differences regarding health status including traumatic SCI. In addition to this contextualization, there are potential methodological issues and limitations with regard to data collection and its quality assessment. The paucity of validation studies of registries and databases is alarming and suggests caution when comparing those results. For instance, underestimation of the numerator is a major methodological issues in the studies focused on incidence and prevalence of any disease or clinical condition. 

Our review also indicates that the incidence rates of traumatic SCI increased in Canada, United States, Finland, Fiji and Norway, whereas they reduced in Taiwan, Iceland and New South Wales. Again, methodological considerations should be taken prior to interpreting those discrepancies. Further studies are required to confirm those trends and, more importantly, to determine the reasons for such differences which may be applied to improve health status in other countries.

The prevalence studies in our review suggest that the number of people with traumatic SCI can greatly vary depending upon the geographic region. Again, underestimation of the numerator may play a key role in the lower prevalence rates reported in some of those previous studies. Improvement of economics, quality of life and healthcare apparatus actually contributed to an increased life span of person with traumatic SCI as documented in previous studies (DeVivo et al. 1999; Strauss et al. 2006). Therefore, a boost in the prevalence is at least partially explained by an increase in the individuals’ life span after a traumatic SCI. Prevalence rates could also be amplified by a real increase in the incidence rate of traumatic SCI as previously heralded in a number of those studies.

The results of this review indicate differences among geo-political regions regarding the incidence and prevalence rates of traumatic SCI. Also, an increase in the incidence and prevalence rates of traumatic SCI has been reported in several countries worldwide. However, this comprehensive review of the literature also emphasizes the need for further studies on incidence and prevalence of traumatic SCI. By understanding of the reasons for the discrepancies in the incidence and prevalence rates among those geographic regions, one may speculate that successful strategies could favor a reduction in the global burden of this clinical condition.

Frequency of SCI by Cause

It is well established that using safe practices at work and at play can prevent many SCIs.  Although significant efforts have recently been made towards the prevention of SCI, further improvements can be made to prevention strategies by identifying and studying the various causes of SCI throughout the world.

In tables 6 through 13, we present a global perspective on the frequency of the leading causes of SCI (motor vehicle crashes (MVC), falls, sports, self harm, violence, work-related incidents, natural disasters, and other).

Discussion

Motor Vehicle Crashes

There are 59 studies reporting on SCI as a result of MVCs (table 6). These studies present statistics from 30 different countries with all the continental regions having at least one reporting country. A variety of data sources were used including national and regional registries and national, regional or local hospital admission/discharge or survey representing a variety of methodological differences. North America has the most studies (N=24) primarily from the United States (N=17 studies) followed by Europe (N=19 studies). Only one study reported data on South America.

Motor vehicle accidents related SCI ranged from 6.9% in Nepal (Shresta et al. 2007) to 89% in Nigeria (Olasode et al. 2006). The most prevalent proportion fell within the 40-49.9% range (N=18 studies) followed by the 30-39.9% range (N=16 studies). Inclusion criteria is likely one of the primary reasons for the wide variation of reported ranges as some studies included all causes of SCI while others excluded non-traumatic causes or other subgroups such as degeneration, or individuals with or without neurological deficits.

Table 6: Motor Vehicle Crash

Falls

There are 58 studies reporting fall data leading to an SCI (table 7). The majority of the studies (N=20 studies) use data arising from hospital admission/discharge data sources which include either single or multiple regionally located hospitals. A total of 10 studies are based on national data from specifically designed SCI databases. Most of the studies were conducted in North America (Canada N=4 studies; United States N=15 studies) and Europe (N=19 studies) with some representation from countries in Asia (N=9 studies), Africa (N=5 studies), Oceanic (N=5 studies), and South America (N=1 study).

Fall related SCI ranges from a low of 2.2% in Italy (Caldana and Lucca 1998) to a high of 77.6% in Nepal (Lakhey et al. 2005). The high rate of falls reported in Nepal is due to the occupational hazard of working in trees. The most commonly reported proportion of fall related SCI was in the 20-30% range (N=21 studies) followed by the <20% range (N=14 studies). One obvious potential sources of variation in the proportion of fall related cause was based on age as samples that represented all ages tended to have a lower proportion of fall related SCI compared to samples that consisted of older adults. Studies from Japan (Shingu et al. 1995; Shingu et al. 1994) and Romania (Soopramanien et al. 1994) had higher proportions of fall related causes compared to other countries: the mean age of subjects in these studies tended to be older (~40 years plus) than those of the other studies.

Table 7: Falls

Sports

There are 71 different studies reporting sports data (including both organized sports and recreational activities) leading to SCI (table 8). Half of these studies (N=45 studies) report rates of SCI due to sporting accidents in general, and the remaining studies provide frequencies of SCI due to a specific sporting activity. The majority of studies were conducted in North America (Canada N=8 studies; United States N=17 studies) and Europe (N=17 studies), and fewer reports are from Asia (N=10 studies), Oceania (N=12 studies), Africa (N=4 studies) and South America (N=2 studies).  Ten studies reported on the frequency of SCI for more than one specific sporting activity.

Those studies reporting on SCI due to sporting accidents in general have SCI frequencies ranging from a low of 1% in Italy (Caldana and Lucca 1998) to a high of 23.8% in Russia (Silberstein and Rabinovich 1995). The majority of papers citing the frequency of SCI due to sports ranged between 7-16% (N=26 studies). Major sources of variation are likely due to reporting techniques, inclusion criteria, and differences in each study’s definition of sports. For example, in the United States, several studies (Acton et al. 1993; Thurman et al. 1994; Calance et al. 2005) report the frequency of SCI due to diving separately from those frequencies due to sports in general, while other studies include diving in their overall estimates of SCI due to sporting accidents. Moreover, some studies fail to define the sporting activities included in their estimates of SCI due to sports.

Spinal cord injuries due to diving are commonly reported around the world, and are highest in Australia (9.4%) (Ring et al. 1986), Brazil (9.3%) (da Paz et al. 1992), and Finland (9.2%) (Dahlberg et al. 2005). Studies from the US and Japan have also reported SCI frequencies due to diving as high as 8.5%(Acton et al. 1993) and 1.3% (Shingu et al. 1995) respectively.

In South America, Africa, and Oceania, rugby is reported as a leading sports-related cause of SCI. In 16 studies examining SCI due to rugby, incidence was as high as 4.6 per 10,000 player hours in South Africa (Jakoet and Noakes 1998), and prevalence ranged from 1.7 (Rugby League) to 6.8 (Rugby Union) per 100,000 players in Australia (1995-2003) (Berry et al. 2006). Other major causes of sports related SCI include skiing/snowboarding (N=7 studies), ice hockey (N=4 studies) and horseback riding (N=2 studies).

Table 8a: Sports and Recreation - Canada

Table 8b: Sports and Recreation - USA

Table 8c: Sports and Recreation - Europe

Table 8d: Sports and Recreation - Asia

Table 8e: Sports and Recreation - Africa

Table 8f: Sports and Recreation - South America

Table 8g: Sports and Recreation - Oceania

Violence

There are 47 papers reporting SCI as a result of violence . Fourteen studies specifically cite gunshot wounds as the cause of SCI (table 9). The majority of the studies (N=29 studies) use data arising from hospital admission/discharge data sources which include either single or multiple regionally located hospitals. A total of 10 studies are based on national data from specifically designed SCI databases. Most of the studies were conducted in North America (Canada N=3 studies; United States N=16 studies) and Europe (N = 13 studies) with other representation from countries in Asia (N=6 studies), Africa (N=6 studies), Oceania (N=2 studies), and South America (N=1 study).

In North America, the frequency of SCI due to violence in the United States was found to range from a low of 0.97% (Fasset el al. 2007) to a high of 18.9% (Macciocchi et al. 2008). In Canada, reported frequencies were all below 5%. In Europe, the frequency of violence leading to SCI is comparable to that found in North America, with rates ranging from 1% in Germany (Exner and Meicnecke 1997) to11.1% in Greenland (Pederson et al. 1989). Variation in the frequencies is likely due to both reporting and sample population differences.

Rates of SCI due to gunshot wounds are as high as 36% in South Africa (Hart et al. 1994). High rates of SCI due to gunshot wounds are also found in Brazil (26.9%) (de Paz et al. 1992), Turkey (21.3%) (Gur et al. 2005), and Jordan (25.8%) (Otom et al. 1997). High rates of SCI due to gunshot wounds tend to be found in countries with high rates of violent crimes or warfare. Other reported causes of SCI due to violence are knife wounds (N=8 studies) and assault (N=5 studies).

Table 9: Violence

Self-Harm

There are 19 papers reporting SCI as a result of self-harm (table 10).  The majority of the studies use admission data (N=12 studies) from one or multiple hospitals; one study used an SCI specific registry. Eight studies were conducted in Europe (N=8 studies), four studies were from each of North America and Asia, and one study was from Oceania.

Rates of SCI caused by self-harm ranged from a low of 1.3% in Canada (Pickett et al. 2006) to a high of 25.9% in Greenland (Pedersen et al. 1989). The majority of studies reported SCI due to self-harm in the range of 0.5% to 4.5% range (N=11). In addition to Greenland, two other countries reported higher rates of self-harm: Finland (10%; Dahlberg et al. 2005) and Israel (13.6%; Catz et al. 2002). All three countries with high rates of SCI due to self-harm also reported high levels of suicide

Table 10: Self-Harm

Work-related Incidents

There are 12 papers reporting SCI due to work-related injuries (table 11). Eleven papers used admission data from one or multiple hospitals, the remaining paper used data from a SCI registry. The majority of studies were from Europe (N=4) and Oceania (N=3), with representation from North America (N=2), Asia (N=2) and Africa (N=1).

Rates of SCI due to work-related injuries ranged from a low of 3% in New Zealand (Dixon et al. 1993) to a high of 26.8% in Israel (Catz et al. 2002). Of the six studies reporting the specific types of work leading to SCI, all are common in reporting industrial related accidents (ie mining, forestry, farming, etc.) (Dixon et al. 1993; Tator et al. 1993; Stavrev et al. 1994; Igun et al. 1999; O’Connor 2001; Singh et al. 2003).

Table 11: Work-related Incidents

Natural Disasters

An SCI is one of several types of major trauma resulting from a natural disaster. Other injuries include head injury, abdominal injury, fractures of the extremities, crush syndrome and traumatic amputations. Many survivors of natural disasters have multiple injuries. Those with SCI are a subgroup requiring specific adequate care from the beginning e.g. spinal immobilization at the place of injury. It was estimated that in the 2003 earthquake in Bam / Iran more than 40.000 persons died and about 30.000 were injured overall. Of, 854 patients referred to tertiary hospitals out of the region, 156 (12%) had spinal column or cord injury (Mohebbi Prehospital Disast Med 2008).

Adequate provision of pre-hospital and acute care and rehabilitation for spinal cord injured persons is a major problem in low resource countries hit by a natural disaster. Available local medical emergency teams are often understaffed, underequipped or cannot reach remote rural regions in a timely manner. In addition, they are not trained in adequate care for persons with SCI. The health care infrastructures often were not adequate for SCI care before a disaster occurs. Even in regions with sufficient infrastructures, health services may be overwhelmed if many patients with major trauma need to be admitted at the same time. Further, most lay persons and first responders providing rescue and medical aid to disaster survivors do not know how to transport a person with suspected SCI safely. Thus, secondary lesions may result from well-intended but harmful manipulation of the victim.

In situations of mass-casualty with a sudden high load of severely injured, triage schemes are applied in order to allocate scarce resources to those who are most likely to benefit (Benson 1996)(Jenkins Prehosp Disaster Med 2008). Patients with SCI, in particular those with high lesions, may require surgical spinal stabilization and intensive acute care, but such services are usually not available in affected areas with low resources and lack of transport facilities. Thus, patients with complex trauma including SCI might not be given immediate priority because of their smaller probability of survival (Gautschi Prehosp Disaster Med 2008). Also, surgical care may not be regarded as an immediate priority if resources are scarce (Sheng 1987).

We identified 10 studies with a focus on SCI resulting from natural disasters (table 12). These papers cover the earthquakes in Tangshan, China in 1976, Yerevan, Armenia in 1988, Hanshin, Japan in 1995, Bam, Iran in 2003, Kashmir, Pakistan in 2005, and Sichuan, China in 2008. Of note, we did not find any publications reporting on SCI resulting from other types of natural disasters such as the tsunami in the Indian Ocean in 2004 or hurricane Katrina in 2005.

The frequency of SCI ranged from 0.02% in Japan and Iran (Maruo and Matumoto 1996; Naghi et al. 2005) to a high of 1.2% (n = 5000 SCIs) in China (Chang et al. 2000). The majority of injuries reported were to the lumber region of the spine, (Chen et al. 2009; Dong et al. 2009; Tauqir et al. 2006; Chang et al. 2000; Tanaka et al. 1997; Maruo and Matumoto 1996) however, not all injuries resulted in damage to the spinal cord. The most common mechanism of SCI was being struck by a falling object while sitting or standing (Rathore et al. 2007; Maruo and Matumoto 1996).

Table 12: Natural Disasters

Other

There 32 papers reporting SCI due to “other” causes (table 13). “Other” causes may also include the causes discussed above, as well as, miscellaneous causes not mentioned above or unique causes of SCI. The majority of studies were from Europe (N=14 studies) with some representation from North America (N=9 studies), Asia (N=6 studies), Africa (N=3 studies) and Oceania (N=3 studies). Fourteen of these studies reported SCI due to being struck by an object.

Rates of SCI due to “other” causes range from a low of 0.4% in Nigeria (Obalum et al. 2009) to a high of 14.1% in Spain (Garcia-Reneses et al. 1991). The reported frequency of the majority of papers were between 5.3% and 11.0% (N = 12 studies). Rates of SCI due to “struck by object” ranged from 2.0% in New Zealand (Dixon et al. 2003) to 14.6% in Taiwan (Chen et al. 1985). The majority of papers reported frequencies between 2% and 5% (N=8).

Table 13: Other

Summary – Frequency of SCI by Cause

Previous studies have indicated a lack of uniformity in data collection and reporting of information related to the various causes of SCI (Ackery et al 2004). Because of the lack of uniform reporting on the classifications of the various etiologies of SCI, it is difficult to compare results. Nonetheless, as a result of our review, we have found that the most common causes of SCI reported around the world are motor vehicle crashes, falls, sports, violence, self-harm, and work. Althoughmost SCIs result from permanent risks such as those previously mentioned, a single natural disaster such as an earthquake may result in a sudden high burden of trauma in the affected populations. Depending on the type, intensity and extent of a disaster, such incidents can cause a large number of SCIs at one time, and is therefore a cause of SCI that deserves more attention.

In order to truly understand the implications of the differing causes of SCI there is a need for a common approach to evaluate and report on the causes of SCIs in the various regions of the world (Ackery et al. 2004). Therefore, future epidemiological studies on SCI are needed to be conducted with common data collection and reporting techniques, in order better compare data between regions. Such information will lead not only to greater understanding of worldwide statistics on SCI, but also to better developed international injury prevention programs.  Based on the present trends in causes of SCI, the implementation of the following measures could reduce the risk of traumatic spinal cord injury:

  • Motor vehicle accidents and traffic related accidents are the most common causes of SCI in developed countries.  Programs aimed towards the prevention of these types of accidents are crucial and may include: speed control; safety, such as wearing seat belts while driving or riding in a car, and use of the age- and weight-appropriate child safety seats; and increasing knowledge about the implications of driving while intoxicated or under the influence of drugs.
  • Due to aging populations around the world, SCIs due to falls are commonly reported and were found to be the second most common cause of SCI.  Programs aimed towards the prevention of falls among the elderly may include the use of walkers or other assistive devices at home. Program aimed towards the prevention of falls at work may include education and proper safety gaurds.
  • Finally, because sporting and recreational related activities are the 3rd leading cause of SCI, individuals should take precautions when playing sports, use recommended safety gear, and follow proper guidelines for the prevention of SCI.

References

  • Ackery A, Tator C, Krassioukov A. A global perspective on spinal cord injury epidemiology. J Neurotrauma 2004;21(10):1355-1370.
  • Acton PA, Farley T, Freni LW, Ilegbodu VA, Sniezek JE, Wohlleb JC. Traumatic spinal cord injury in Arkansas, 1980 to 1989. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993;74(10):1035-1040.
  • Ahoniemi E, Alaranta H, Hokkinen EM, Valtonen K, Kautiainen H. Incidence of traumatic spinal cord injuries in Finland over a 30-year period. Spinal Cord 2008;46(12):781-784.
  • Albert T, Ravaud JF, Tetrafigap group. Rehabilitation of spinal cord injury in France: a nationwide multicentre study of incidence and regional disparities. Spinal Cord 2005;43(6):357-365.
  • Aung TS, el Masry WS. Audit of a British Centre for spinal injury. Spinal Cord 1997;35(3):147-150.
  • Berry JG, Harrison JE, Yeo JD, Cripps RA, Stephenson SC. Cervical spinal cord injury in rugby union and rugby league: are incidence rates declining in NSW? Aust N Z J Public Health 2006;30(3):268-274.
  • Biering-Sorensen E, Pedersen V, Clausen S. Epidemiology of spinal cord lesions in Denmark. Paraplegia 1990;28(2):105-118.
  • Boden BP, Tacchetti RL, Cantu RC, Knowles SB, Mueller FO. Catastrophic cervical spine injuries in high school and college football players. Am J Sports Med 2006;34(8):1223-1232.
  • Bohu Y, Julia M, Bagate C, Peyrin J, Colonna J, Thoreux P, et al. Declining incidence of catastrophic cervical spine injuries in French rugby: 1996-2006. Am J Sports Med 2009;37(2):319-323.
  • Bracken MB, Freeman DH,Jr, Hellenbrand K. Incidence of acute traumatic hospitalized spinal cord injury in the United States, 1970-1977. Am J Epidemiol 1981;113(6):615-622.
  • Burke DC, Brown D, Hill V, Balian K, Araratian A, Vartanian C. The development of a spinal injuries unit in Armenia. Paraplegia 1993;31(3):168-171.
  • Burke DA, Linden RD, Zhang YP, Maiste AC, Shields CB. Incidence rates and populations at risk for spinal cord injury: a regional study. Spinal Cord 2001;39(5):274-278.
  • Calancie B, Molano MR, Broton JG. Epidemiology and demography of acute spinal cord injury in a large urban setting. J Spinal Cord Med 2005;28(2):92-96.
  • Caldana L, Lucca L. Epidemiological remarks on traumatic spinal cord injuries and non- traumatic spinal cord diseases in Veneto 1994-1995. Europa Medicophysica 1998;34(3):159-168.
  • Cantu RC, Mueller FO. Catastrophic spine injuries in American football, 1977-2001. Neurosurgery 2003;53(2):358-362.
  • Carmody DJ, Taylor TK, Parker DA, Coolican MR, Cumming RG. Spinal cord injuries in Australian footballers 1997-2002. Med J Aust 2005;182(11):561-564.
  • Carroll CM. Spinal cord injuries in Arkansas due to violence: 1980-1989. Spinal Cord 1997;35(6):341-348.
  • Catz A, Thaleinsnik M, Fishel B, Ronen J, Spasser R, Fredman B, Shabtay E, Gepstein R. Survival following spinal cord injury in Israel. Spinal Cord 2002;40(11):595-598.
  • Centers for Disease Control (CDC). Trends in traumatic spinal cord injury--New York, 1982-1988. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1991;40(31):535-537; 543.
  • Chang SM, Hou CL, Dong DQ, Zhang H. Urologic status of 74 spinal cord injury patients from the 1976 Tangshan earthquake, and managed for over 20 years using the Credé maneuver. Spinal Cord 2000;38(9):552-554.
  • Chen HY, Chiu WT, Chen SS, Lee LS, Hung CI, Hung CL, et al. A nationwide epidemiological study of spinal cord injuries in Taiwan from July 1992 to June 1996. Neurol Res 1997;19(6):617-622.
  • Chen CF, Lien IN. Spinal cord injuries in Taipei, Taiwan, 1978-1981. Paraplegia 1985;23(6):364-370.
  • Chen R, Song Y, Kong Q, Zhou C, Liu L. Analysis of 78 patients with spinal injuries in the 2008 Sichuan, China, earthquake. Orthopedics 2009;32(5):322.
  • da Paz AC, Beraldo PS, Almeida MC, Neves EG, Alves CM, Khan P. Traumatic injury to the spinal cord. Prevalence in Brazilian hospitals. Paraplegia 1992;30(9):636-640.
  • Dahlberg A, Kotila M, Leppänen P, Kautiainen H, Alaranta H. Prevalence of spinal cord injury in Helsinki. Spinal Cord 2005;43(1):47-50.
  • Demetriades D, Charalambides K, Chahwan S, Henpeter D, Alo K, Velmahos G, et al. Nonskeletal cervical spine injuries: epidemiology and diagnostic pitfalls. J Trauma 2000;48(4):724-727.
  • Dincer F, Oflazer A, Beyazova M, Celiker R, Basgöze O, Altioklar K. Traumatic spinal cord injuries in Turkey. Paraplegia 1992;30(9):641-646.
  • Ditunno PL, McCauley C, Marquette C. Sensation-seeking behavior and the incidence of spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1985;66(3):152-155.
  • DeVivo MJ, Fine PR, Maetz HM, Stover SL. Prevalence of spinal cord injury: a reestimation employing life table techniques. Arch Neurol 1980;37(11):707-708.
  • DeVivo MJ, Rutt RD, Black KJ, Go BK, Stover SL. Trends in spinal cord injury demographics and treatment outcomes between 1973 and 1986. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1992;73(5):424-430.
  • DeVivo MJ, Krause JS, Lammertse DP. Recent trends in mortality and causes of death among persons with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80(11):1411-9.
  • Dixon GS, Danesh JN, Caradoc-Davies TH. Epidemiology of spinal cord injury in New Zealand. Neuroepidemiology 1993;12(2):88-95.
  • Dong ZH, Yang ZG, Chen TW, Feng YC, Wang QL, Chu ZG. Spinal injuries in the Sichuan earthquake. N Engl J Med 2009;361(6):636-637.
  • Dryden DM, Saunders LD, Rowe BH, May LA, Yiannakoulias N, Svenson LW, Schopflocher DP, Voaklander DC. The epidemiology of traumatic spinal cord injury in Alberta, Canada. Can J Neurol Sci 2003;30(2):113-121.
  • Exner G, Meinecke FW. Trends in the treatment of patients with spinal cord lesions seen within a period of 20 years in German centers. Spinal Cord 1997;35:415-419.
  • Farmer JC, Vaccaro AR, Balderston RA, Albert TJ, Cotler J. The changing nature of admissions to a spinal cord injury center: Violence on the rise. J Spinal Disord 1998;11(5):400-403.
  • Fassett DR, Harrop JS, Maltenfort M, Jeyamohan SB, Ratliff JD, Anderson DG, Hilibrand AS, Albert TJ, Vaccaro AR, Sharan AD. Mortality rates in geriatric patients with spinal cord injuries. J Neurosurg Spine 2007;7(3):277-281.
  • Franz T, Hasler RM, Benneker L, Zimmermann H, Siebenrock KA, Exadaktylos AK. Severe spinal injuries in alpine skiing and snowboarding: a 6-year review of a tertiary trauma centre for the Burnese Alps ski resorts, Switzerland. Br J Sports Med 2008;42(1):55-58.
  • Garcia-Reneses J, Herruzo-Cabrera R, Martinez-Moreno M. Epidemiological study of spinal cord injury in Spain 1984-1985. Paraplegia 1991;28:180-190.
  • Gee RW, Sinha SN. The epidemiology of spinal cord injuries in Papua New Guinea. P N G Med J 1982;25(2):97-99.
  • Goebert DA, Ng MY, Varney JM, Sheetz DA. Traumatic spinal cord injury in Hawaii. Hawaii Med J 1991;50(2):44, 47-48, 50.
  • Griffin MR, O'Fallon WM, Opitz JL, Kurland LT. Mortality, survival and prevalence: traumatic spinal cord injury in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1935-1981. J Chronic Dis 1985;38(8):643-653.
  • Griffin MR, Opitz JL, Kurland LT. Traumatic spinal cord injury in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1935-1981. Am J Epidemiol 1985;121(6):884-895.
  • Gur A, Serdar Kemaloglu M, Cevik R, Jale Sarac A, Nas K, Kapukaya A, et al. Characteristics of traumatic spinal cord injuries in south-eastern Anatolia, Turkey: A comparative approach to 10 years' experience. Int J Rehabil Res 2005;28(1):57-62.
  • Hagen EM, Rekand T, Gilhus NE, Gronning M. Diagnostic coding accuracy for traumatic spinal cord injuries. Spinal Cord 2009 May;47(5):367-371.
  • Hart C, Williams E. Epidemiology of spinal cord injuries: a reflection of changes in South African society. Paraplegia 1994;32(11):709-714.
  • Harvey C, Rothschild BB, Asmann AJ, Stripling T. New estimates of traumatic SCI prevalence: a survey-based approach. Paraplegia 1990;28(9):537-544.
  • Hoque MF, Grangeon C, Reed K. Spinal cord lesions in Bangladesh: an epidemiological study 1994-1995. Spinal Cord 1999;37(12):858-861.
  • Hu R, Mustard CA, Burns C. Epidemiology of incident spinal fracture in a complete population. Spine 1996;21(4):492-499.
  • Ide M, Ogata H, Tokuhiro A, Takechi H. Spinal cord injuries in Okayama Prefecture: An epidemiological study '88-'89. J UOEH 1993;15(3):209-215.
  • Igun GO, Obekpa OP, Ugwu BT, Nwadiaro HC. Spinal injuries in the Plateau State, Nigeria. East Afr Med J 1999;76(2):75-79.
  • Jakoet I, Noakes TD. A high rate of injury during the 1995 Rugby World Cup. S Afr Med J 1998;88(1):45-47.
  • Kalsbeek WD, McLaurin RL, Harris BS 3rd, Miller JD. The National Head and Spinal Cord Injury Survey: Major findings. J Neurosurg 1980;Suppl:S19-31
  • Kannus P, Palvanen M, Niemi S, Parkkari J. Alarming rise in the number and incidence of fall-induced cervical spine injuries among older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2007;62(2):180-183.
  • Karacan I, Koyuncu H, Pekel Ö, Sümbüloglu G, Kirnap M, Dursun H, Kalkan A, Cengiz A, Yalinkilic A, Unalan HI, Nas K, Orkun S, Tekeoglu I. Traumatic spinal cord injuries in Turkey: a nation-wide epidemiological study. Spinal Cord 2000;38(11):697-701.
  • Karamehmetoglu SS, Nas K, Karacan I, Sarac AJ, Hoyuncu AJ, Ataoglu S, Erdogan F. Traumatic spinal cord injuries in Southeast Turkey: an epidemiological study. Spinal Cord 1997;35(8):531-533.
  • Karamehmetoglu SS, Unal S, Karacan I, Yilmaz H, Togay HS, Ertekin M, Dosoglu M, Ziyal MI, Kasaro glu D, Hakan T. Traumatic spinal cord injuries in Istanbul, Turkey. An epidemiological study. Paraplegia 1995;33(8):469-471.
  • Kew T, Noakes TD, Kettles AN, Goedeke RE, Newton DA, Scher AT. A retrospective study of spinal cord injuries in Cape Province rugby players, 1963-1989. Incidence, mechanisms and prevention. S Afr Med J 1991;80(3):127-133.
  • Knutsdottir S. Spinal Cord Injury in Iceland 1973-1989. A follow up study. Paraplegia 1993;31:68-72.
  • Koning W, Frowein RA. Incidence of spinal cord injury in the Federal Republic of Germany. Neurosurg Rev 1989;12(Suppl 1):562-566.
  • Koo DW, Fish WW. Spinal cord injury and snowboarding--the British Columbia experience. J Spinal Cord Med 1999;22(4):246-251.
  • Krassioukov AV, Furlan JC, Fehlings MG. Medical Co-Morbidities, Secondary Complications, and Mortality in Elderly with Acute Spinal Cord Injury. J Neurotrauma 2003;20(4):391-399.
  • Kraus JF, Franti CE, Riggins RS, Richards D, Borhani NO. Incidence of traumatic spinal cord lesions. J Chronic Dis 1975;28(9):471-92.
  • Kuptniratsaikul V. Epidemiology of spinal cord injuries: a study in the Spinal Unit, Siriraj Hospital, Thailand, 1997-2000. J Med Assoc Thai 2003;86(12):1116-1121.
  • Lakhey S, Jha N, Shrestha BP, Niraula S. Aetioepidemiological profile of spinal injury patients in Eastern Nepal. Trop Doct 2005;35(4):231-233.
  • Lan C, Lai JS, Chang KH, Jean YC, Lien IN. Traumatic spinal cord injuries in the rural region of Taiwan: an epidemiological study in Hualien county, 1986-1990. Paraplegia 1993;31(6):398-403.
  • Levi R, Hultling C, Nash MS, Seiger A. The Stockholm spinal cord injury study: 1. Medical problems in a regional SCI population. Paraplegia 1995;33(6):308-315.   
  • Levy LF, Makarawo S, Madzivire D, Bhebhe E, Verbeek N, Parry O. Problems, struggles and some success with spinal cord injury in Zimbabwe. Spinal Cord 1998;36(3)213-218.
  • Macciocchi S, Seel RT, Thompson N, Byams R, Bowman B. Spinal cord injury and co-occurring traumatic brain injury: assessment and incidence. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008;89(7):1350-1357.
  • Maharaj JC. Epidemiology of spinal cord paralysis in Fiji: 1985-1994. Spinal Cord 1996;34(9):549-559.
  • Marshall LF. Epidemiology and cost of central nervous system injury. Clin Neurosurg 2000;46:105-112.
  • Martin B. Paediatric cervical spine injuries. Injury 2005;36(1):14-20.
  • Martins F, Freitas F, Martins L, Dartigues JF, Barat M. Spinal cord injuries--epidemiology in Portugal's central region. Spinal Cord 1998;36(8):574-578.
  • Maruo S, Matumoto M. Spinal fractures resulting from the 1995 Great Hanshin Earthquake of the Kobe-Osaka area of Japan. Spinal Cord 1996;34(7):382-386.
  • Molsa JJ, Tegner Y, Alaranta H, Myllynen P, Kujala UM. Spinal cord injuries in ice hockey in Finland and Sweden from 1980 to 1996. Int J Sports Med 1999;20(1):64-67.
  • Naghi TM, Kiani K, Mazlouman SJ, Taheri A, Kamrani RS, Panjavi B, Harandi BA. Musculoskeletal injuries associated with earthquake. A report of injuries of Iran’s December 26, 2003 Bam earthquake casualties managed in tertiary referral centres. Injury 2005;36(1)27-32.
  • National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center. Spinal cord injury: facts and figures at a glance. J Spinal Cord Med 2000;23(1):51-53.
  • National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center. Spinal cord injury. Facts and figures at a glance. J Spinal Cord Med 2005;28(4):379-380.
  • National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center. Spinal cord injury Facts and figures at a glance. J Spinal Cord Med 2008;31(3):357-8.
  • Noakes TD, Jakoet I, Baalbergen E. An apparent reduction in the incidence and severity of spinal cord injuries in schoolboy rugby players in the Western Cape since 1990. S Afr Med J 1999;89(5):540-545.
  • Nobunaga AI, Go BK, Karunas RB. Recent demographic and injury trends in people served by the Model Spinal Cord Injury Care Systems. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80(11):1372-1382.
  • Obalum DC, Giwa SO, Adekoya-Cole TO, Enweluzo GO. Profile of spinal injuries in Lagos, Nigeria. Spinal Cord 2009;47(2):134-137.
  • O’Connor P. Incidence and patterns of spinal cord injury in Australia. Accid Anal Prev 2002;34(4):405-415.
  • O'Connor PJ. Forecasting of spinal cord injury annual case numbers in Australia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86(1):48-51.
  • Olasode BJ, Komolafe IE, Komolafe M, Olasode OA. Traumatic spinal cord injuries in Ile-Ife, Nigeria, and its environs. Trop Doct 2006;36(3):181-182.
  • Otom AS, Doughan AM, Kawar JS, Hattar EZ. Traumatic spinal cord injuries in Jordan--an epidemiological study. Spinal Cord 1997;35:253-255.
  • Pagliacci MC, Celani MG, Zampolini M, Spizzichino L, Franceschini M, Baratta S, Finali G, Gatta G, Perdon L; Gruppo Italiano Studio Epidemiologico Mielolesioni. An Italian survey of traumatic spinal cord injury. The Gruppo Italiano Studio Epidemiologico Mielolesioni study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003;84(9):1266-75.
  • Pedersen V, Müller PG, Biering-Sørensen F. Traumatic spinal cord injuries in Greenland 1965-1986. Paraplegia 1989;27(5):345-349.
  • Pickett GE, Campos-Benitez M, Keller JL, Duggal N. Epidemiology of traumatic spinal cord injury in Canada. Spine 2006;31(7):799-805.
  • Pickett W, Simpson K, Walker J, Brison RJ. Traumatic spinal cord injury in Ontario, Canada. J Trauma 2003;55(6):1070-1076.
  • Price C, Makintubee S, Herndon W, Istre GR. Epidemiology of traumatic spinal cord injury and acute hospitalization and rehabilitation charges for spinal cord injuries in Oklahoma, 1988-1990. Am J Epidemiol 1994;139(1):37-47.
  • Quarrie KL, Gianotti SM, Hopkins WG, Hume PA. Effect of nationwide injury prevention programme on serious spinal injuries in New Zealand rugby union: ecological study. BMJ 2007;334(7604):1150.
  • Raineteau O, Schwab ME. Plasticity of motor systems after incomplete spinal cord injury. Nat Rev Neurosci 2001;2(4):263-273.
  • Raissi GR, Mokhtari A, Mansouri K. Reports from spinal cord injury patients: eight months after the 2003 earthquake in Bam, Iran. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2007;86(11):912-917.
  • Rathore M, Rashid P, Butt AW, Malik AA, Gill ZA, Haig AJ. Epidemiology of spinal cord injuries in the 2005 Pakistan earthquake. Spinal Cord 2007;45(10):658-663.
  • Ravaud J-F, Delcey M, Desert J-F, TETRAFIGAP Group. The Tetrafigap Survey on the long-term outcome of tetraplegic spinal cord injured persons, Part II: Demographic characteristics and initial cause of injury. Spinal Cord 2000;38(3):164-172.
  • Razdan S, Kaul RL, Motta A, Kaul S, Bhatt RK. Prevalence and patter of major neurological disorders in rural Kashmir (India) in 1986. Neuroepidemiology 1994;13: 113-119.
  • Ring IT, Berry G, Dan NG. Epidemiology and clinical outcomes of neurotrauma in New South Wales. Aust N Z J Surg 1986;56(7):557-566.
  • Roe JP, Taylor TK, Edmunds IA, Cumming RG, Ruff SJ, Plunkett-Cole MD, et al. Spinal and spinal cord injuries in horse riding: the New South Wales experience 1976-1996. Aust N Z J Surg 2003;73(5):331-334.
  • Rotem TR, Lawson JS, Wilson SF, Engel S, Rutkowski SB, Aisbett CW. Severe cervical spinal cord injuries related to rugby union and league football in New South Wales, 1984-1996. Med.J.Aust. 1998 Apr 20;168(8):379-381.
  • Schmitt H, Gerner HJ. Paralysis from sport and diving accidents. Clin J Sport Med 2001;11(1):17-22.
  • Secin FP, Poggi EJ, Luzuriaga F, Laffaye HA. Disabling injuries of the cervical spine in Argentine rugby over the last 20 years. Br J Sports Med 1999;33(1):33-36.
  • Shingu H, Ikata T, Katoh S, Akatsu T. Spinal cord injuries in Japan: A nationwide epidemiological survey in 1990. Paraplegia 1994;32(1):3-8.
  • Shingu H, Ohama M, Ikata T, Katoh S, Akatsu T. A nationwide epidemiological survey in Japan from January 1990 to December 1992.  Paraplegia 1995;33(4):183-188.
  • Shrestha D, Garg M, Singh GK, Singh MP, Sharma UK. Cervical spine injuries in a teaching hospital of eastern region of Nepal: A clinico-epidemiological study. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc 2007;46(167):107-111.
  • Silberstein B, Rabinovich S. Epidemiology of spinal cord injuries in Novosibirsk, Russia. Paraplegia 1995;33(6):322-325.
  • Singh R, Sharma SC, Mittal R, Sharma A. Traumatic spinal cord injuries in Haryana: an epidemiological study. Indian J Community Med 2003;28(4):184-186.
  • Soopramanien A. Epidemiology of spinal injuries in Romania. Paraplegia 1994;32(11):715-722.
  • Spinecare F, Australian Spinal Cord Injury U. Spinal cord injuries in Australian footballers. Aust N Z J Surg 2003;73(7):493-499.
  • Stanford RE, Soden R, Bartrop R, Mikk M, Taylor TKF. Spinal cord and related injuries after attempted suicide: Psychiatric diagnosis and long-term follow-up. Spinal Cord 2007;45(6):437-443.
  • Starr-Bocian J. Colorado's experience. Spinal cord injuries: five years of support and surveillance. Colo Med 1991;88(9):260-261.
  • Stavrev P, Kitov B, Dimov S, Kalnev B, Petrov K. Incidence of spinal cord injuries in Plovdiv and Plovdiv region, Bulgaria. Folia Med (Plovdiv) 1994;36(4):67-70.
  • Strauss DJ, Devivo MJ, Paculdo DR, Shavelle RM. Trends in life expectancy after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006;87(8):1079-85.
  • Surkin J, Gilbert BJ, Harkey HL,3rd, Sniezek J, Currier M. Spinal cord injury in Mississippi. Findings and evaluation, 1992-1994. Spine 2000;25(6):716-721.
  • Tahmasebi MN, Kiani K, Mazlouman SJ, Taheri A, Kamrani RS, Panjavi B, Harandi BA. Musculoskeletal injuries associated with earthquake. A report of injuries of Iran's December 26, 2003 Bam earthquake casualties managed in tertiary referral centers. Injury 2005;36(1):27-32.
  • Tanaka H, Oda J, Iwai A, Kuwagata Y, Matsuoka T, Takaoka M, Kishi M, Morimoto F, Ishikawa K, Mizushima Y, Nakata Y, Yamamura H, Hiraide A, Shimazu T, Yoshioka T. Morbidity and mortality of hospitalized patients after the 1995 Hanshin-Awaji earthquake. Am J Emerg Med 1999;17(2):186-191.
  • Tarazi F, Dvorak MF, Wing PC. Spinal injuries in skiers and snowboarders. Am J Sports Med 1999;27(2):177-180.
  • Tator CH, Duncan EG, Edmonds VE, Lapczak LI, Andrews DF. Changes in epidemiology of acute spinal cord injury from 1947 to 1981. Surg Neurol 1993;40(3):207-215.
  • Tator CH, Edmonds VE, Lapczak L, Tator IB. Spinal injuries in ice hockey players, 1966-1987. Can J Surg 1991;34(1):63-69.
  • Tator CH, Provvidenza CF, Lapczak L, Carson J, Raymond D. Spinal injuries in Canadian Ice Hockey: Documentation of injuries sustained from 1943-1999. Can J Neurol Sci 2004;31(4):460-466.
  • Tauqir SF, Mirza S, Gul S, Ghaffar H, Zafar A. Complications in patients with spinal cord injuries sustained in an earthquake. J Spinal Cord Med 2007;30(4):373-377.
  • Thurman DJ, Burnett CL, Beaudoin DE, Jeppson L, Sniezek JE. Risk factors and mechanisms of occurrence in motor vehicle-related spinal cord injuries: Utah. Accid Anal Prev 1995;27(3):411-415.
  • Torg JS, Vegso JJ, O'Neill MJ, Sennett B. The epidemiologic, pathologic, biomechanical, and cinematographic analysis of football-induced cervical spine trauma. Am J Sports Med 1990;18(1):50-57.
  • Umaru H, Ahidjo A. Pattern of spinal cord injury in Maiduguri, North Eastern Nigeria. Niger J Med 2005;14(3):276-278.
  • van Asbeck F, Post M, Pangalila RF. An epidemiological description of spinal cord injuries in The Netherlands in 1994. Spinal Cord 2000;38(7):420-424.
  • Warren S, Moore M, Johnson MS. Traumatic head and spinal cord injuries in Alaska (1991-1993). Alaska Med 1995;37(1):11-19.
  • Wildavsky A (1977). The political pathology of health policy” in Knowles JH (ed.) “Doing better and Feeling worse”. W.W. Norton. New York, pp.105-123.
  • Woodruff BA, Baron RC. A description of nonfatal spinal cord injury using a hospital-based registry. Am J Prev Med 1994;10(1):10-14.
  • Yamakawa H, Murase S, Sakai H, Iwama T, Katada M, Niikawa S, et al. Spinal injuries in snowboarders: risk of jumping as an integral part of snowboarding. J Trauma 2001;50(6):1101-1105.
  • Yang NP, Deng CY, Lee YH, Lin CH, Kao CH, Chou P. The incidence and characterisation of hospitalised acute spinal trauma in Taiwan--a population-based study. Injury 2008;39(4):443-450.
  • Ye C, Sun T, Li J, Zhang F. Pattern of sports- and recreation-related spinal cord injuries in Beijing. Spinal Cord 2009;47(12):857-60.
  • Yeo JD. Prevention of spinal cord injuries in an Australian study (New South Wales). Paraplegia 1993;31(12):759-763.

Heterotopic Ossification

Introduction

Heterotopic ossification (HO) is the formation of pathological bone in muscle or soft tissue.  The incidence in individuals following a spinal cord injury (SCI) has been reported to vary greatly, ranging from 10-78% (van Kuijk et al. 2002, Banovac 2001).  Banovac et al. (2001) notes HO occurs most frequently in the first 2 months after SCI below the level of paralysis.  The etiology of HO is not fully understood which creates challenges in determining appropriate diagnostic and therapeutic approaches.

Teasell RW, Mehta S, Aubut JL, Ashe MC, Tu L. (2010). Heterotopic Ossification Following Spinal Cord Injury. Syringomyelia Following Spinal Cord Injury. In Eng JJ, Teasell RW, Miller WC, Wolfe DL, Townson AF, Hsieh JTC, Connolly SJ, Mehta S, Sakakibara BM, editors. Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Evidence. Version 3.0.

Pathophysiology of Heterotopic Ossification

The mechanism underlying heterotopic ossification following spinal cord injury is not fully understood but it appears to be initiated by mesenchymal cells into bone precursor cells (Schuetz et al. 2005). Pape et al. (2004) has noted that mesenchymal stem cells can differentiate into osteogenic cells given the right stimuli within the right environment, even soft tissues (Chalmers et al. 1975).  These mesenchymal stem cells can generate cartilage, bone, muscles, tendons, ligaments or fat (Williams et al. 1999) and are thought to play a pivotal role in the development of HO (Pape et al. 2004). HO then forms through a typical process beginning with the formation of a protein mixture created by bone cells (osteoid) that eventually calcifies within a matter of weeks (Pape et al. 2001).   Over the next few months, the calcified osteoid remodels and matures into well-organized trabecular bone (Pape et al. 2001).  Months following the initial trauma patients develop bone formation in muscle and soft tissues adjacent to a joint (paraarticular) with resultant restriction in range of motion, pain and ankylosis (Banovac & Gonzalez 1997, Garland et al. 1980).  The bony lesion has a high metabolic rate, adding new bone at more than three times the rate of normal bone.  Osteoclastic (bone removal cell) density is more than twice that found in healthy bone (Puzas et al. 1987).    It is suspected there may be a neurogenic factor contributing to HO but the mechanism is poorly understood (Hurvitz et al. 1992, Pape et al. 2001, Pape et al. 2004).

Figure 1

chart

Clinical Presentation and Natural History

Schuetz and coworkers (2005) has noted that the symptoms of heterotopic ossification appear 3-12 weeks after spinal cord injury.  SCI patients typically present with joint and muscle pain, parasthesias and tissue swelling in the involved region, accompanied by mild fever (Thomas & Amstutz 1987; Orzel & Rudd 1985; Smith 1998;Shehab et al. 2002).  In the initial stages of HO, clinical signs of inflammation are nonspecific (Neal 2003).

Diagnosis

In the early phase of HO, three phase bone scanning demonstrates increased uptake of osteotropic radionucleotides. Bone scanning has proven to be more sensitive than plain radiography in detecting early HO. Neurogenic HO becomes evident on plain radiography approximately 2 to 6 weeks after diagnosis using the three phase bone scan (Orzel et al. 1985; Freed et al. 1982). However, bone scans have lower specificity than radiography (Freed et al. 1982). CT or MRI scanning may be a useful tool when considering surgery as it allows for better visualization of the heterotopic bone (Amendola et al. 1983). Some studies have looked into diagnosing HO through elevations of biochemical markers such as alkaline phosphatase (Singh et al. 2003; Tibone et al. 1978) and creatine phosphokinase (Singh et al. 2003; Welch et al. 1973; Rossier et al. 1973). The predictive value of alkaline phosphatase has not been validated (Singh et al. 2003; Welch et al. 1973; Rossier et al. 1973), while there is conflicting evidence of an association of HO with increased serum creatine phosphokinase levels (Singh et al. 2003; Welch et al. 1973). Schurch et al. (1997) studied individuals with acute SCI and found increases in the 24 hour prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) urinary excretion a valid indicator of early HO formation.

Treatment of Heterotopic Ossification

The published literature on treatment of HO provides evidence for non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, warfarin, bisphosphonates, pulse low-intensity electromagnetic field therapy, radiation and surgical excision.

Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs as Prophylaxis

Indomethacin and Rofecoxib have both been evaluated in the treatment of HO post SCI.

Table 1 Anti-Inflammatory Drugs as Prophylaxis

Discussion

Two highly rated RCTs examined the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the early phase after SCI in an attempt to reduce the incidence of HO. Banovac and coworkers (2001)randomized 33 SCI patients approximately 3 weeks post SCI and treated them prophylactically with either slow-release indomethacin 75 mg daily or placebo for a total of 3 weeks.  Patients were carefully followed with regular clinical follow-up and nuclear bone scans.  There was a significantly higher incidence of HO, diagnosed on nuclear bone scan and on radiographs, in the placebo group when compared with the group receiving indomethacin (p<.001).  Banovac et al. (2004)in a more recent study randomized 76 patients in the early phase post SCI into 2 groups: the treatment group who received 25 mg rofecoxib daily for weeks and a placebo group.  A significantly lower incidence of HO was found in the rofecoxib group (13.4%) than in the placebo group (33.3%) (p<.05).  Both of these RCTs provided compelling evidence that anti-inflammatory drugs, given prophylactically, reduce the likelihood of developing HO post-SCI.  Rofecoxib is no longer available due to cardiovascular side effects. 

Conclusions

  • There is strong Level 1 evidence that non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications can reduce the incidence of heterotopic ossification when administered early after a spinal cord injury.
  • Anti-inflammatory medications given early post-SCI reduces development of heterotopic ossification.

Warfarin as Prophylaxis

Warfarin is a well-known anticoagulant which may also be useful in the prevention of heterotopic ossification post SCI.

Table 2 Warfarin as a Prophylaxis

Discussion

There is only one observational retrospective study which noted an association between Warfarin use and heterotopic ossification post SCI.  Buschbacher et al. (1992)studied 227 patients with SCI.  None of the 33 patients treated with Warfarin an average of 5.4 weeks post SCI were diagnosed as suffering from heterotopic ossification; of the remaining 193 patients, 34 were diagnosed as suffering from HO and no patient with a diagnosis of HO had been treated with Warfarin.  The authors speculated that Warfarin provided a protective or inhibitory effect against HO.

Conclusion

  • There is Level 5 evidence that Warfarin inhibits the development of heterotopic ossification post spinal cord injury.
  • Warfarin may inhibit the development of heterotopic ossification post SCI.

Bisphosphonates

Two bisphosphonates, Etidronate and pamidronate, have been studied in the treatment of HO progression post SCI. Etidronate was introduced in the 1970s for the treatment of heterotopic ossification post SCI and is still commonly used today (Banovac et al. 1997; Fleisch 1991). Etidronate works by inhibiting the transformation of amorphous calcium phosphate into crystalline hydroxyapetite (Fleisch 1991; Fleisch et al. 1969; Banovac et al. 1997).  Although commonly used its efficacy in prophylaxis has been questioned (Finerman & Stover 1981). Pamidronate is a new generation nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate (Schuetz et al. 2005).

Table 3 Bisphosphonates in the Treatment of Heterotopic Ossification Post SCI

Discussion

Banovac et al. (1993)provided intravenous etidronate for 3-5 days followed by oral etidronate for 6 months to 27 SCI patients following diagnosis of heterotopic ossification and then compared to 11 SCI patients treated with oral etidronate for 6 months alone.  After the initial intravenous therapy, 20 patients showed prompt reduction in swelling over the first 48 hours while 7 patients had no change or an increase in swelling.  Overall, treatment reduced swelling (p<.01).  There was no significant difference noted between the intravenous and orally treated groups in its effect on heterotopic ossification.

Garland et al. (1983) assessed the effectiveness of Etidronate treatment on SCI patients with clinical signs of HO over a 2 year period.  Ossification appeared to plateau in only 1 of 9 patients, while an increase in HO was seen to varying degrees in the remaining patients.

Banovac et al. (1997)subsequently studied 46 patients (of whom 5 were excluded because of discontinuation of therapy) who were treated with 3 days of intravenous disodium etidronate followed by oral etidronate for 6 months.  33 patients had a positive bone scan but a negative x-ray for HO and of these 5 discontinued treatment and showed gradual progression of HO.  Of the remaining 28 patients, 22 had no x-ray evidence of HO while 6 developed HO on x-ray.  13 patients had both a positive bone scan and a positive x-ray; of these progression of soft tissue ossification was inhibited by etidronate in 6 patients, while the remaining 7 did not respond to treatment and showed progression of HO.

Banovac (2000)studied 40 SCI patients with HO, diagnosed early with positive bone scan but negative x-rays, were treated with etidronate (intravenous x 3days and then oral x 6months).  11 of the 40 (27.5%) developed radiographic evidence of HO from 1.5-6.0 years post initiation of therapy. 

Stover et al. (1987) conducted a pre-post trial of 87 adult SCI patients and found that there was no difference between patients treated with etidronate disodium for 3 months vs. 6 months.  However, those who received earlier treatment did better on x-rays.

Secondary prevention of HO post surgical excision was examined by Subbarao et al. (1987, N=5)and Schuetz et al. (2005, N=7).  The first study included etridonate treatment pre and post surgical hip wedge resection and found at followup patients still had severe restriction in their range of motion (Subbarao et al. 1987). In the second study, (Schuetz et al. 2005), pamidronate was administered pre and post surgical removal of HO with no recurrence.  However, sample sizes in both studies were small.

The lack of RCTs and the different treatment scenarios make it difficult to come to definitive conclusion.  It appears that etidronate is able to delay or inhibit HO progression once it is diagnosed and it tends to work better when given earlier after SCI.

Conclusions

  • There is Level 2 evidence that etidronate can stop the progression of heterotopic ossification once the diagnosis is made; it is most effective if treatment is provided when the nuclear bone scan is positive but the radiographs are negative.
  • There is Level 4 evidence that Etidronate is not effective once radiographs are positive for HO.
  • There is Level 4 evidence that pamidronate effectively halts secondary HO progression after surgical resection of HO.
  • Etidronate can halt the progression of heterotopic ossification.
  • Paminodrate halts secondary progression of HO post surgical excision.

Pulse Low Intensity Electromagnetic Field Therapy

Pulse low intensity electromagnetic field therapy uses magnetic fields to increase oxygen levels and decrease toxic by-products of inflammation by increasing local blood flow (Durovic et al. 2009).

Table 4 Pulse Low Intensity in Treatment of Heterotopic Ossification Post SCI

Discussion

Durovic et al. (2009) randomly assigned 29 SCI patients into either the control group or the treatment group.  Both received range of motion and exercise therapy; however only the treatment group received PLIMF therapy an average of 7 weeks post injury for 4 weeks.  The study showed no incidence of HO in the treatment group and a 33% incidence in the control group (p<0.04).

Conclusion

  • There is Level 1 evidence that PLIMF is an effective prophylaxis of HO post SCI
  • PLIMF is effective in preventing HO post SCI

Radiation Therapy

Radiation therapy or radiotherapy is the use of ionizing therapy.

Table 5 Radiation Therapy in Treatment of Heterotopic Ossification Post SCI

Discussion

A case series examined the effectiveness of radiotherapy administered to 52 SCI patients (Sautter-Bihl et al. 2001).  The study found radiotherapy effectively prevented primary and secondary HO post surgical excision in 71% of patients.  However, treatment did not result in regression of HO once developed as measured by the Brooker scale.  Two joints increased in Brooker score, neither of them developed any functional impairments.

Sautter-Bihl et al. (2000)studied 36 patients with HO of whom 27 patients (32 joints) received radiotherapy when ossification was minimal.  11 patients (13 joints) had obvious ossifications, which had to be resected.  Post-op radiotherapy was performed 24-36 hours post-operatively.  2 patients received radiotherapy both before and after surgery.  Mean duration of follow-up was 23.6 months.  30 of the 36 irradiated patients showed no progression of HO.  In 3 patients, reossifications after therapy resulted in a moderate decrease in joint mobility.

Conclusion

  • There is limited Level 4 evidence that radiotherapy reduces the progression of heterotopic ossification.
  • Radiotherapy can reduce the progression of heterotopic ossification.

Surgical Resection of HO Post SCI

Surgical resection of HO post SCI is a well established treatment but still somewhat controversial.

Table 6 Surgical Resection of HO Post SCI

Discussion

Meiners et al. (1997) reported on a case series of 10 quadriplegics and 19 paraplegics who underwent HO resection at the hip followed by irradiation and eventually passive range of motion exercises.  Mean hip ROM increased from 21.95º pre-operatively to 94.51º intra-operatively and 82.68º at 4 year (mean) follow-up.

Garlandand Orwin (1989) examined the effect of HO excision to improve range of motion in 19 individuals with SCI. They found that the largest gain of function occurred intraoperatively followed by a large loss of function within the first 6 months. At final follow up (6 yrs post surgery), 3 of 24 hip joints where HO was surgically excised had similar or less motion when compared with preoperative motion, 15 improved between 10 and 39° while 6 showed greater than 40° improvement.

The effectiveness of surgical excision followed by bisphosphonates was examined in two case series (Schuetz et al. 2005; Subbarao et al. 1987).  Etidronate treatment post surgical excision showed patients were able to function independently in a wheelchair; however they had severe restrictions in their range of motion (Subbarao et al. (1987).  Surgical excision supplemented with pamidronate treatment resulted in no recurrence of HO post surgery (Schuetz et al. 2005).

Conclusion

  • There is level 4 evidence that resection of HO about the hip post SCI can dramatically improve restricted hip range of motion.
  • There is Level 4 evidence that surgical resection combined with pamidronate treatment effectively halts secondary HO progression.
  • Surgical resection of HO can improve hip range of motion.
  • Surgical resection and pamidronate treatment halts secondary HO progression.

Summary

  • Schuetz and coworkers (2005) note that after a SCI, heterotopic ossification still remains a therapeutic challenge.  Anti-inflammatory medications provided early prevent the development of HO while warfarin was associated with a decreased risk of HO.  Both radiotherapy and etidronate appear to halt the progression of HO once it is diagnosed. Although more research is needed, early work is encouraging demonstrating that HO post SCI is treatable.
  • There is strong Level 1 evidence that non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications can reduce the incidence of heterotopic ossification when administered early after a spinal cord injury.
  • There is Level 5 evidence that Warfarin inhibits the development of heterotopic ossification post spinal cord injury.
  • There is Level 2 evidence that etidronate can stop the progression of heterotopic ossification once the diagnosis is made; it is most effective if given when  the nuclear bone scan is positive but the radiographs are negative.
  • There is Level 4 evidence that Etidronate is not effective once radiographs are positive for HO.
  • There is Level 4 evidence that pamidronate effectively halts secondary HO progression after surgical resection of HO.
  • There is Level 1 evidence that PLIMF is an effective prophylaxis of HO post SCI
  • There is limited Level 4 evidence that radiotherapy reduces the progression of heterotopic ossification.
  • There is level 4 evidence that resection of HO about the hip post SCI can dramatically improve restricted hip range of motion.
  • There is Level 4 evidence that surgical resection combined with pamidronate treatment effectively halts secondary progression of HO.

Key Points

  • Anti-inflammatory medications given early post-SCI reduces development of heterotopic ossification.
  • Warfarin may inhibit the development of heterotopic ossification post-SCI.
  • Etidronate can halt the progression of heterotopic ossification.
  • Paminodrate halts secondary progression of HO post surgical excision.
  • Pulse low intensity electromagnetic field therapy is effective in preventing HO post SCI.
  • Radiotherapy can reduce the progression of heterotopic ossification.
  • Surgical resection of HO can improve hip range of motion.
  • Surgical resection and pamidronate treatment halts secondary HO progression.

References

  • Amendola MA, Shirazi K, Amendola BE, Kuhns LR, Tisnado J, Yaghmai I. Computed tomography of malignant tumors of the osseous pelvis. Comput.Radiol 1983;7:107-117.
  • Banovac K, Gonzalez F, Wade N, Bowker JJ.  Intravenous disodium etidronate therapy in spinal cord injury patients with heterotopic ossification.  Paraplegia 1993;31:660-666.
  • Banovac K, Gonzalez F.  Evaluation and management of heterotopic ossification in patients with spinal cord injury.  Spinal Cord 1997;35:158-162.
  • Banovac K, Gonzalez F, Renfree KJ.  Treatment of heterotopic ossification after spinal cord injury.  J Spinal Cord Med 1997;20:60-65.
  • Banovac K.  The effect of etidronate on late development of heterotopic ossification after spinal cord injury.  The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine 2000;23:40-44.
  • Banovac K, Williams JM, Patrick LD, Haniff YM.  Prevention of heterotopic ossification after spinal cord injury with indomethacin.  Spinal Cord 2001;39:370-374.
  • Banovac K, Williams JM, Patrick LD, Levi A.  Prevention of heterotopic ossification after spinal cord injury with COX-2 selective inhibitor (rofecoxib).  Spinal Cord 2004;42:707-710.
  • Buschbacher R, McKinley W, Buschbacher L, Devaney CW, Coplin B.  Warfarin in prevention of heterotopic ossification.  American J Phys Med Rehabil 1992;71:86-91.
  • Chalmers J, Gray DH, Rush J. Observations on the induction of bone in soft tissues. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1975;57:36-45.
  • Durovic A, Miljkovic D, Brdareski Z, Plavsic A, Jevtic M. Pulse low intensity electromagnetic field as prophylaxis of heterotopic ossification in patients with traumatic spinal cord injury. Vojnosanit  Pregl 2009; 66: 22–28.
  • Finerman GA, Stover SL.  Heterotopic ossification following hip replacement or spinal cord injury.  Two clinical studies with EHPD.  Metab Bone Dis Rel Res 1981;3:337-342.
  • Fleisch H.  Biphosphonates.  Pharmacology and use in the treatment of tumour-induced hypercalcaemic and metastatic bone disease.  Drugs 1991;42:919-944.
  • Fleisch H, Russell RG, Francis MD.  Diphosphonates inhibit hydroxyapatite dissolution in vitro and bone resorption in tissue culture and in vivo.  Science 1969;165:1262-1264.
  • Freed JH, Hahn H, Menter R, Dillon T. The use of the three-phase bone scan in the early diagnosis of heterotopic ossification (HO) and in the evaluation of didronel therapy. Paraplegia 1982;208-216.
  • Garland DE, Orwin JF. Resection of heterotopic ossification in patients with spinal cord injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989; 242: 169-276.
  • Garland DE, Thompson R, Waters RL. Musculocutaneous neurectomy for spastic elbow flexion in non-functional upper extremities in adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1980;62:108-112.
  • Hurvitz EA, Mandac BR, Davidoff G, Johnson JH, Nelson VS. Risk factors for heterotopic ossification in children and adolescents with severe traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1992;73:459-462.
  • Meiners T, Abel R, Bohm V, Gerner HJ. Resection of heterotopic ossification of the hip in spinal cord injured patients. Spinal Cord 1997;35:443-445.
  • Neal B.  Effects of heterotopic bone formation on outcome after hip arthroplasty. A J Surg 2003;73:422-426.
  • Orzel JA, Rudd TG.  Heterotopic bone formation: clinical, laboratory, and imaging correlation.  J Nucl Med 1985;26:125-132.
  • Pape HC, Lehmann U, van GM, Gansslen A, von GS, Krettek C. Heterotopic ossifications in patients after severe blunt trauma with and without head trauma: incidence and patterns of distribution. J Orthop Trauma 2001;15:229-237.
  • Pape HC, Marsh S, Morley JR, Krettek C, Giannoudis PV. Current concepts in the development of heterotopic ossification. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004;86:783-787.
  • Puzas JE, Evarts CM, Brand JS. The stimulus for bone formation. Hip 1987;25-38.
  • Rossier AB, Bussat P, Infante F, Zender R, Courvoisier B, Muhelm G et al. Current facts of para-osteo-arthropathy (POA). Paraplegia 1973;11(1):38-78.
  • Sautter-Bihl ML, Hultenschmidt B, Liebermeister E, Nanassy A Fractionated and single-dose radiotherapy for heterotopic bone formation in patients with spinal cord injury. A phase-I/II study, Strahlenther Onkol 2001; 177: 200-205.
  • Sautter-Bihl ML, Liebermeister E, Nanassy A.  Radiotherapy as a local treatment option for heterotopic ossifications in patients with spinal cord injury.  Spinal Cord 2000;38:33-36.
  • Schurch B, Capaul M, Vallotton MB, Rossier AB. Prostaglandin E2 measurements: Their value in the early diagnosis of heterotopic ossification in spinal cord injury patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997;78(7):687-691
  • Schuetz P, Mueller B, Christ-Crain M, Dick W, Haas H.  Amino-biphosphonates in heterotopic ossification: first experience in five consecutive cases.  Spinal Cord 2005;43:604-610.
  • Shehab D. Elgazzar AH, Collier BD.  Heterotopic ossification.  J Nucl Med 2002;43:346-353.
  • Singh RS, Craig MC, Katholi CR, Jackson AB, Mountz JM. The predictive value of creatine phosphokinase and alkaline phosphatase in identification of heterotopic ossification in patients after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003;84(11):1584-1588.
  • Smith R.  Fibrodysplasia (myositis) ossificans progressive.  Clinical lessons learned from a rare disease.  Clin Orthop 1998;346:7-14.
  • Stover SL. Didtonel in the prevention of heterotopic ossification following spinal cord injury: Determination of an optimal treatment schedule. Rehabil R D Prog Rep 1987;25:110-111.
  • Subbarao JV, Nemchausky BA, Gratzer M, Hines E.  Resection of heterotopic ossification and didronel therapy – regaining wheelchair independence in the spinal cord injured patient.  J AM Paraplegia Soc. 1987;10:3-7.
  • Thomas BJ, Amstutz HC.  Prevention of heterotopic bone formation: clinical experience with diphosphonates.  Hip 1987;59-69.
  • Tibone J, Sakimura I, Nickel VL, Hsu JD. Heterotopic ossification around the hip in spinal cord-injured patients. A long-term follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1978;60(6):769-775.
  • van Kuijk AA, Geurts AC, van Kuppevelt HJ.  Neurogenic ossification in spinal cord injury.  Spinal Cord 2002;40:313-326.
  • Welch K, Goldberg D. Serum creatine phosphokinase in motor neuron disease. Neurology 1973;22:697-701.
  • Williams JT, Southerland SS, Souza J, Calcutt AF, Cartledge RG. Cells isolated from adult human skeletal muscle capable of differentiating into multiple mesodermal phenotypes. Am Surg 1999;65:22-26.
  • Wilkinson JM, Stockley I, Hamer AJ, Barrington NA, Eastell R.  Biochemical markers of bone turnover and development of heterotopic ossification after total hip arthroplasty.  J Orthop Res 2003;21:529-534.

Housing and Attendant Care

Introduction

Individuals go through a demanding functional rehabilitation process following a spinal cord injury (SCI). Having an SCI involves taking into account important issues (e.g., financial support, insurance, technological devices or equipment, etc.) when planning for discharge home. Appropriate housing and attendant care are cornerstones of successful reintegration. In cases where individuals are more vulnerable, the quality of these resources, in particular in term of functionality and availability, can make the difference between independent living or not.

For the past three decades these issues have been of interest to and addressed to some extent by both the academic and disability communities. The work done by the disability community has been oriented towards the perspective of increasing access to more specific resources such as support and equipment, as well as to mainstream resources such as transportation, housing, health, and educational services. These advocacy actions have been undertaken to increase choice and control over issues related to the living arrangements of persons with disabilities, in particular those with SCI. Within the academic community many of the studies related to independent living have focused largely on impact research relating to several dimensions of the life of persons with disabilities, as well as on the community as a whole. We present in this chapter the findings involving persons with SCI.

Housing is a fundamental need of all people. Finding appropriate living arrangements within the community can be difficult for many individuals with SCI after they are discharged from rehabilitation. Yet housing is key to a successful transition from rehabilitation to community reintegration. Because of the cost associated with altering the physical environment to accommodate an individual with an SCI, housing presents a financial challenge and therefore housing can be a significant obstacle limiting one’s opportunities to resume an active role and fully integrate within the community. This issue is also connected to two other important factors: 1) community resources related to availability and capacity to provide support, and 2) opportunity to choose one’s living environment. Both factors have been documented as playing an important role in the quality of community reintegration and residential satisfaction.

Attendant care services are a resource designed to provide a person with SCI with support so they can engage in activities of daily living that are considered important. This support is usually put into place after discharge from rehabilitation when the individual returns to his/her community. Several important decisions are required when considering attendant care services, such as who will provide the support, how it will work, who will pay for it, etc. At the same time, the relationship between rehabilitation services and community resources must be also considered in the context of the built environment to ensure the best opportunities for independent living among individuals with SCI. For example, the quality of the built environment, particularly housing adaptations, is very important because it can influence how the attendant care services will be provided in terms of the intensity and frequency of care.

In this chapter we provide a review of literature related to housing and attendant care services, and the influence of these factors on the quality of life of individuals with SCI living in the community. In order to develop a more comprehensive analysis of this material, the literature selection and review methods used have been expanded beyond those traditionally used for the other SCIRE reviews (see SCIRE Methods). Specifically, two new databases with a focus on the social sciences were searched (Social Sciences Abstracts and Social Work Abstracts), and the inclusion criteria were broadened to include any study (including qualitative studies) that was at least partially community-based which examined factors influencing satisfaction with housing and attendant care needs after SCI, issues with access, and/or interventions improving outcomes.

Boucher N, Ballantyne E, Boschen K (2010). Housing and Attendant Care : Cornerstones of Community Reintegration after SCI. In: Eng JJ, Teasell RW, Miller WC, Wolfe DL, Townson AF, Hsieh JTC, Connolly SJ, Mehta S, Sakakibara BM, editors. Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Evidence. Volume 3.0. Vancouver: p. 1-25.

Housing

Housing is a primary need for all individuals. The necessity of having a safe home compatible with one’s personal needs increases when an individual is vulnerable. One of the first questions asked when a person has sustained and survived an SCI is where he/she will be able to live. Successful community reintegration is intimately linked to housing within the background of the person’s needs, the attributes of relevant environmental factors, and the preferred choice of living environment of the person with the injury. Until recently, SCI authors generally only discussed the issue of the suitability of a home regarding its physical accessibility and adaptations (Heywood, 2004; Forrest and Gombas 1995; McAweeney et al. 1996). Forrest and Gombas (1995) revealed that a lack of accessible housing increases a person’s length of stay on the rehabilitation unit, thus increasing the overall cost of healthcare services after SCI.

The choice of living environment for people with SCI is critical because of their increased need for human and environmental support, requiring them to carefully consider who they will live their life with and where. In some cases, individuals with SCI do not have a choice because of the lack of accessible housing inventory. Having a range of choices of housing likely hastens and enhances the transition from rehabilitation to community while improving the personal match to the living environment. Ten non-intervention housing articles are presented below. Given that stable housing is a basic human need, it is virtually impossible to develop intervention studies in this research area of inquiry.

Table 1: Housing

Discussion

From the onset of SCI, the rehabilitation services and the resources required for independent living remain two of the key elements for successful community reintegration. This is particularly true for people with spinal cord injury who use more services (particularly related to housing) than other consumers with disabilities such as TBI or Stroke (Fuhrer et al 1990). According to Tate and Forchheimer (1998) participation in an independent living program (e.g., peer counseling, group support, etc.) can provide better knowledge of the resources needed and may lead to better personal control and adjustment upon return to the community. However, a follow-up study of an independent living program revealed it had little or no impact on life satisfaction or personal control of participants with SCI (Forchheimer and Tate 2004). Marital status and transportation barriers are the most important predictors related to living arrangement post-SCI (DeJong et al 1984). Boschen (1996) found that the best predictor of residential satisfaction was having the perception of choice of residence, and that satisfaction with residential placement was correlated with life satisfaction.

Boschen (1988, 1990) found that the level of satisfaction with the home is also related to difficulties encountered living in the home, primarily because of environmental barriers. Moreover, the level of satisfaction was higher among persons with SCI living in their own apartment. In previous work, Boschen (1988) revealed that having one’s own apartment was preferred by the individuals with SCI and that their choice is determined by the quality of the environment, particularly in terms of accessibility. The choice of residence is limited by many factors and the limitations are magnified as the severity of disability increases. Therefore individuals with tetraplegia are at a significant disadvantage. The findings indicate that those with tetraplegia move several times after discharge from rehabilitation. The moves are influenced by factors such as information, money, accessibility, insurance, personal assistance, etc. Individuals with SCI who eventually end up living with their parents or in an institution consider such living arrangement as their last option (Bergmark et al 2008). Anzai et al (2006) found that certain social and personal factors (e.g., age, having insurance or private funding) reduce the risk of moving to a nursing home after discharge from rehabilitation. Living in an environment considered to be minimally restrictive which enables active participation in daily decisions according to the principles of independent living is more likely to contribute to improved quality of life (DeJong and Hughes 1982).  Finally, safety at home is important to persons with SCI, particularly related to fire. Many participants indicated they would need assistance with that dimension of home safety (Cesar et al. 2002).

The evidence reveals the importance of the continuity of services between rehabilitation and return to the community (Fuhrer et al 1990). The lack of accessible housing is an important barrier that may have an impact on the community reintegration process as well as on rehabilitation service costs. Community services play an important role, especially in housing and peer support to return to independent living (Fuhrer et al. 1990; Tate and Forchheimer 1998). Finally, the quality of the built environment is one of the key determinants of the ability to find housing that meets the needs of persons with SCI, which also affects their level of satisfaction with respect to where they reside. Freedom of choice related to selecting where they will live constitutes a salient feature of life satisfaction for many. However those individuals who encounter obstacles (related to accessibility, financial support and so on) will likely have little choice when it comes to selection of housing (Boschen 1988; 1990). Despite opportunities to participate in transitional or independent living programs before discharge from rehabilitation, the common finding of this body of work is that the move back into the community following SCI seems to be a real test of both the supportiveness of the environment and the resilience and resourcefulness of the individual in determining the success of the reintegration.

Conclusions

  • There is level 5 evidence (Forrest and Gombas 1995) that discharge from hospital was delayed for a significant portion of SCI patients due to lack of accessible housing, which leads to unnecessary increase of cost of care.
  • There is level 5 evidence (Fuhrer et al 1990) that ILCs with MRP relationships serve more clients than those without, and that the most frequently serviced individuals are those with SCI who attend for peer counseling, skills training, and discharge planning.
  • There is level 5 evidence (DeJong and Hughes 1982) that living with a spouse and/or children, living alone, or living with unrelated persons were more desirable arrangements than living with parents and spouse/children together, living with distant family (i.e. grandparents), or living with parents and siblings.
  • There is level 4 evidence (DeJong et al 1984) that marital status, transportation barriers, education level, medical supervision requirements, economic disincentives, services received, and severity of disability are predictors of independent living.
  • There is level 5 evidence  (Boschen 1996) that issues of choice and control are important when planning living situations and setting goals with clients because they are directly related to residential and life satisfaction.
  • There is level 5 evidence (Boschen 1990) that individuals with SCI have lower perceived life satisfaction, locus of control and satisfaction with certain aspects housing than a normative sample.
  • There is level 5 evidence (Boschen 1988) that accommodation options for a person with a disability are limited. The preferred accommodation is a private house or apartment.
  • There is level 5 evidence (Anzai et al 2006) that living with someone prior to SCI, having insurance or private funding for equipment, and being younger decreases the risk of being discharged to an extended care facility following SCI rehabilitation.
  • There is level 5 evidence (Cesar et al 2002) that individuals with SCI have a need for assistance with fire safety to increase their perception of home safety.
  • There is qualitative evidence (Bergmark et al 2008) that suggests individuals with SCI move multiple times after injury. In most cases they start living with their parents and/or in an institution before moving into their own homes.
  • In many cases, discharge from hospital is delayed for SCI patients due to lack of accessible housing, which leads to unnecessary increase of cost of care.
  • ILCs with MRP relationships serve more clients than those without, and the most frequently serviced individuals are those with SCI who attend for peer counseling, skills training and discharge planning.
  • Living with a spouse and/or children, living alone, or living with unrelated persons are more desirable arrangements than living with parents and spouse/children together, living with distant family (i.e. grandparents), or living with parents and siblings.
  • Marital status, transportation barriers, education level, medical supervision requirements, economic disincentives, services received, and severity of disability are predictors of independent living.
  • Choice and control are important when planning living situations and setting goals with clients with SCI because they are directly related to residential and life satisfaction.
  • Individuals with SCI have lower perceived life satisfaction, locus of control, and satisfaction with certain aspects of housing than a normative sample.
  • Accommodation options for a person with a disability are limited. The preferred accommodation is a private house or apartment.
  • Living with someone prior to SCI, having insurance or private funding for equipment, and being younger decreases the risk of being discharged to an extended care facility following SCI rehabilitation.
  • Individuals with SCI have a need for assistance with fire safety to increase their perception of home safety.
  • Individuals with SCI move multiple times after injury. In most cases they start living with their parents and/or in an institution before moving into their own homes.

Attendant Care

Advances in medical technology have increased survival rates for traumatic injuries and as a result, more people are living longer with an SCI (Adams and Beatty 1998).  However, functional impairment due to SCI may necessitate the use of attendant care or personal assistance services (PAS).  Attendant care can be broadly defined as home-based support that assists individuals to perform tasks they would otherwise not be able to perform themselves. Attendant care service providers are usually either non-paid family members or paid workers who help with everyday personal or self-care tasks such as bathing, dressing, grooming, and transfers (Berry et al. 1995; Cockerill and Durham 1992; Meyer et al. 2007). They may also assist with instrumental activities of daily living such as cooking, chores, and shopping (Berry et al. 1995; Cockerill and Durham 1992). In this way, personal assistance or attendant care facilitates what was called independent living 20 - 30 years ago and is now commonly referred to as community integration and social participation, and which may also include accommodated employment and/or adapted sports and recreation (Adams and Beatty 1998). In addition, home-based attendant care, which is typically provided only part-time and not on a full-day basis, has long been recognized as more cost-effective when compared to institutional costs (Hoeman and Winters 1990).

It should be noted that independent living does not require that a person be able to carry out their routine tasks alone without help from someone else. While tasks are completed with some assistance, the emphasis of independent living is placed on the individual’s right to decide when, where, and how tasks are performed (Litvak et al. 1987). Indeed, recipients of paid personal care assistance (PCA) have emphasized the importance of being in control of training the assistant. How the assistance is to be provided is discussed with the attendant at the outset of the professional relationship (Meyer et al. 2007). Some individuals prefer untrained attendants so they can train and direct them to suit their own particular needs. Being able to direct attendants to assist with managing personal care post-SCI maximizes the ability to promote good health and enables the person with the SCI to live more independently and productively. Personal care attendants may be skilled or unskilled workers, licensed or unlicensed, registered nurses, nursing assistants, nurse’s aids, home health aids, or paid or unpaid family members (Berry et al. 1995; Pomeranz et al. 2006).  Typically, individuals with tetraplegia in need of 24-hour care will require such care from nurses with specialized training, whereas persons with lower-level injuries may be fairly self-sufficient and require less-skilled assistance with daily tasks.

Attendant care is a common and essential aspect of daily living for many individuals with an SCI (Berry et al. 1995). The United States Federal Bureau of Statistics predicted that the number of personal care attendants would be 827,000 in 2005 (Frost et al. 1999). Attendant care services can be expensive and are therefore an important financial as well as social consideration. In 1992, the average individual yearly cost of attendant care services for all levels of SCI combined was $14,359 USD two years after injury (Johnson et al. 1996). However, costs ranged dramatically and these data are now clearly outdated. But for comparison purposes it is instructive to know that the annual mean cost of PAS for individuals with high tetraplegia (C1-C4) was $92,441 while average costs were $2,184 for persons with paraplegia (T1-S5). Another study found a range of $38-$798 spent per day on attendant care (Mattson-Prince 1997). A third costing study, also from the 1990’s, found that 44% of total costs related to SCI were for attendant care (Harvey et al. 1992).

Regardless of cost, PCA is essential for many SCI consumers and is correlated with a variety of factors. Previous studies have found that gender may influence PCA use; men tend to rely on family members whereas women are more likely to pay for services from an outside agency (Shackleford et al. 1998). A 1992 study revealed that approximately two-thirds of individuals with SCI received an average of 25 hours of paid or unpaid weekly PCA; more than half received 40 hours per week or less. The majority of this care was provided voluntarily (Harvey et al. 1992). Family caregivers tend to be female, a spouse, and over 40 years of age (Foster et al. 2005). It is important to understand the patterns of PCA use, the characteristics of family support providers, and the impact of this role on these lifelong assistants (Boschen et al. 2005a, 2005b). Families often play a central role in providing home services, which is beneficial to the injured person but has significant health, career, social, and other personal consequences for the informal provider (Boschen and Gargaro 2009). One generic rehabilitation study documented that family caregivers may experience poorer health, higher rates of anxiety and depression, and possibly develop more long-term health problems (Holicky 1996). The evidence base from the above studies of these family caregiver consequences is crucial for justifying healthcare and social support direct service allocation to SCI families, and highlights the need for promoting self-care for all PCA providers to improve stability of services.

Despite using a broad definition of attendant care or personal assistance there are very few high-quality academic articles in the literature on this topic. The articles reviewed in Table 2 below focus both on the characteristics of attendant care for the adult SCI population and on the promotion of their independent function and behaviours that will maintain or improve their health. Specifically, articles were included if they addressed the effectiveness of in-home attendant care services, factors influencing the use of and access to attendant care, and/or future interventions to improve outcomes. Qualitative data were included in this review due to the paucity of intervention articles and the utility of the data obtained from these studies which met the chapter inclusion criteria.  Most of the research evidence comes from observational studies, with few randomized controlled trials (RCTs). All intervention studies involving facilitation of the individual to direct their own attendant care have been included in Table 3 in this chapter.

Non-Intervention Attendant Care Studies

This attendant care literature review for non-intervention attendant care articles includes five peer-reviewed observational articles all classified at Level 5 and one qualitative article. A summary of the findings can be found in Table 2.

Table 2: Non-Intervention Articles

Discussion

Two observational studies identified correlates of PCA turnover and service use. In one study, a large sample of participants with SCI reported the number of new assistants within the past six months, how often they worked, and how satisfied they were with received service (Bushnik et al. 2007). Individuals with high turnover (HT) rates were compared to those with low turnover (LT) rates. The majority of the sample (over 80%) was very or extremely happy with received services, with greater happiness associated with unpaid rather than paid work. There was no difference in turnover rates in relation to injury level. However those with HT had more needs regarding exercise and transfers than those with LT. Individuals with LT had significantly more unpaid attendant care by family members or friends, with higher reported skill level and satisfaction ratings than those with HT. Those with HT were more likely to rate attendant care as restricting their life. No differences were found for QOL, functioning, or rates of secondary complications.

The second observational study identified predictors of PCA use in a large sample of SCI participants by retroactively examining health records from a national SCI database (Weitzenkamp et al. 2002). The motor portion of the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) was the strongest predictor of PCA use, followed by days spent in a nursing home. Length of rehabilitation stay only predicted PCA use for individuals who paid for services. Surprisingly, age, gender, years since injury, and service payer were non-significant variables in predicting attendant care use.

There were two observational studies which described the characteristics of informal caregivers. The first investigated caregivers of a large sample of veterans to obtain a better understanding of future care needs of those aging with an SCI, determine the number of veterans receiving care from family, describe those caregivers, and assess perception of stability of that care (Robinson-Whelan and Rintala 2003). A total of 22% of participants reported receiving only unpaid assistance and received on average 12.9 hours of daily care. Sixteen percent received both unpaid and paid care with an average of 10.4 and 4.8 daily hours respectively. Those with high tetraplegia were more likely to use both paid and paid PCA. Of those who used unpaid care (n = 130), over half (59%) primarily received care from a spouse or partner, followed by parent, sibling/spouse of sibling, and child/spouse of child, most of whom were women. One quarter of participants were not sure their primary caregiver could continue to provide the same care five years in the future, and more than half did not have a suitable alternate person.

A related study of informal caregivers found similar results (Foster et al 2005). PCA were mostly female spouses of the SCI consumer. The most common services provided by unpaid caregivers were practical, emotional, and physical care. Over half of the participants spent more than three hours per day providing care or support. In terms of required services, family caregivers required assistance in six areas: respite/care support (concerns about health problems of caregiver); personal support (managing stress); information services (medical updates and information regarding equipment/aids); health professional services (PT or massage); home help and practical support (housework, yard maintenance); and lifestyle services (employment support for consumer).

A survey compared consumers and attendants with few financial resources on their perceptions of care, satisfaction, independence, and control (Berry et al 1995). Injury level ranged from C7-C3 and most consumers had one regular attendant who worked on a daily basis. Most attendants were family members or friends, as the majority of the sample only had Medicaid to pay for healthcare expenses with no secondary insurance. Most attendants received training during the consumer’s inpatient rehabilitation and were trained by the consumer, nurses, and occupational therapists. The majority of consumers felt assistance was always available in a timely fashion and that meals were on time. All participants felt they were in control of their financial affairs. Most (68%) felt very satisfied with quantity, quality, dependability and overall impression of care. In contrast, attendants often rated their clients as less independent in functioning and self-care than the consumers. They also thought timeliness of care and meals was more of a problem than the individuals with SCI, and they rated their clients’ satisfaction as lower than what clients rated. However, all agreed that control and substance abuse were not problems.

A qualitative study obtained information from attendants and consumers regarding the role of personal assistive services in independent living (Cockerill and Durham 1992). Consumers described the difficulty of obtaining reliable and affordable attendant care services. Attendants struggled with determining whether their agency or the consumer should set priorities and direct care. Burnout was quite common and attributed to little performance appraisal, low pay, and few opportunities for advancement. In terms of transitional centres, both consumers and attendants agreed that the emphasis of care should be promoting consumer independence. However, there was little reported on training for how this was to be accomplished. As a result, attendants created their own methods for educating the client. Obstacles in transitional centers included a lack of tailored skill development for consumers, establishing boundaries for consumer independence, and teaching consumers to direct their attendant care.

Conclusion

  • There is level 5 evidence (Foster et al 2005; Robinson-Whelan and Rintala 2003) indicating that most informal caregivers are female spouses of SCI consumers who required additional assistance in fulfilling and maintaining provided services.
  • There is level 5 evidence (Berry et al 1995) suggesting general satisfaction with informal attendant services from both clients and attendants although there are variations with some aspects of care.
  • There is level 5 evidence (Weitzenkamp et al 2002) that the most significant predictors of PCA use are motor function, days spent in rehabilitation, and length of stay in a nursing home.
  • There is level 5 evidence (Bushnik et al 2007) indicating that personal attendant turnover is positively correlated with higher injury level and increased need for assistance in exercise and transfers.
  • There is qualitative evidence (Cockerill and Durham 1992) that both consumers and attendants agree that the emphasis of care in transitional centres should be placed on facilitating consumer independence which may be accomplished by delineating the role of attendants. 
  • Most informal caregivers are female spouses of individuals with SCI who require assistance in fulfilling and maintaining services.
  • There is general satisfaction with informal attendant services.
  • The most significant predictors of personal care assistance use are motor function, days spent in rehabilitation, and length of stay in a nursing home.
  • Personal attendant turnover is positively correlated with higher injury level and increased need for assistance in exercise and transfers.
  • Directing one’s care, establishing roles and boundaries for PCA, and improving training may facilitate consumer independence.

Intervention Studies for Primary Care Attendant

Maintaining good health practices can lead to a greater level of independence. Moreover maximizing health is an important goal for both the person with the SCI and family caregivers, and is important for the healthcare system since complications and hospitalizations are costly. Most importantly, healthy individuals are more likely to be maintained in community settings and more likely to be productive.

Attendants are often required to perform tasks such as transfers and bowel and bladder care, all of which involve knowledge, skill, and effective communication (Berry et al 1995; DeVivo et al 1989). If not done properly, secondary complications such as pressure sores and urinary tract infections (UTIs) may occur. These issues underscore the need for proper training and assessment of that training.

Personal care assistance services can be obtained through agencies or can be hired, trained, and paid independently by the consumer. The effects of these two approaches in terms of health outcomes and satisfaction is largely unknown. The impact of the type of payer on psychological functioning of SCI consumers has been investigated, and the amount of assistance and payer type may influence self-esteem (Tate et al 1994a).  Those with more psychological distress are more dependent on attendant care and tend to pay for it rather than rely on informal support (Tate et al 1994b).

A total of 6 intervention articles were reviewed which included one Level 1 RCT, a Level 2 prospective study, two Level 4 pre-post studies, one Level 4 case series, and a Level 4 observational study. A summary of the methods and outcomes can be found in Table 3.

Table 3. Interventions that Promote Use of Attendant Care

Discussion

Health promotion is an important area for maintenance of individuals in the community. Only three intervention studies were identified in this area and only one is of a high quality; the other two are observational studies. Cohen and Schemm (2007) conducted an RCT with a convenience sample of persons with SCI in the early phases of rehabilitation. The occupational therapist visits were intended to be client goal-focused, structured, and individualized. They were to help the participants increase their functional independence and the depth and breadth of their social roles. No statistically important differences were noted in the participants’ independence level or handicap level based on this intervention.

Barber and colleagues (1999) studied the effectiveness of skills-focused counselling for persons at risk of developing UTIs and found that the risk can be reduced below threshold levels. It should be noted that a majority of the participants required multiple sessions, suggesting that skill-based interventions such as this must be repeated over sessions and time to achieve change. The authors stressed that this is a simple and cost-effective intervention when compared to the medical interventions required with chronic UTIs.

The Beck and Scroggins (2001) post-test study has several interesting aspects. A health maintenance education program was developed to deal with a preponderance of re-hospitalizations due to spinal cord dysfunction with tetraplegia. The program was comprised of: a one-day workshop consisting of evidence-based education; a collaborative home visit; and ongoing support provided via telephone. Healthcare providers and family members were included, in recognition that the larger healthcare system needs to be educated regarding SCI consequences and available resources; the one-year opportunity for follow-up; and the collaborative home/facility visit after the workshop in order to provide individualized “real-world” follow-up  to the concepts discussion in the workshop (strategies, educational resources, and supervised practice).

Attendant care training was discussed in a prospective controlled trial and a case series. Schopp et al (2007) evaluated a PAS training program with 87 consumers and 53 personal assistants in a longitudinal study that was designed to improve the relationship between consumer and caregiver in addition to increasing knowledge of health and wellness. Both groups attended a workshop which provided information about health threats, severity of various secondary conditions, and specific health behaviours to prevent complications such as pressure sores and UTIs from arising. A physician led this study and provided training for bowel and bladder management, nutrition, and weight-loss strategies. A second component to this intervention was interactive sessions involving role-playing, discussions on effective listening and communication skills, and assertiveness training. Training was completed as one large group and then separate groups consisting of caregivers and consumers. The results revealed no change in the working relationship between the two groups. However, knowledge among participants significantly increased.

A case series investigated the utility of training persons with disabilities to provide PCA for SCI consumers in an inner city via the Linking Employment, Abilities and Potential (LEAP) PVA Training Program (Frost et al 1999). Obtaining preliminary results was hampered by unsafe work environments, changing discharge locations, and limited verbal abilities of the attendants. However, one female client with a C5 injury used LEAP services and was doing well with both the agency and family help. More data must be collected to determine client satisfaction and success of the intervention.

Despite the common use of attendant care services, there have been few studies which investigate the utility of various types of personal care. One observational study compared agency-provided PCA with self-managed attendant care. Seventy-one participants with high-level tetraplegia were interviewed about their experiences with either approach using measures of health status, life satisfaction, functional ability, service satisfaction, locus of control, and cost (Mattson-Prince 1997). Results indicated significant savings using non-agency attendants ($156 per day if using 24-hour care) and are higher when non-agency nurses are used. Further, those not using agencies had better health outcomes, fewer re-hospitalizations, and greater life satisfaction and locus of control than those using agency-based attendant care services. It should be noted that paid attendant services were often complemented by attendant care provided by family members.

Conclusion

  • There is level 1 evidence (Cohen and Schemm 2007) indicating that client-centred visits by an occupational therapist can increase the number of life roles performed and improve life satisfaction.
  • There is level 4 evidence (Barber et al. 1999) that suggests recurrent UTIs can be reduced below threshold levels through a simple cost-effective educational intervention by a clinical nurse.
  • There is level 4 evidence (Beck and Scroggins 2001) that suggests that health can be maintained after participation in an educational intervention focused on skill development and support in the “real world.”
  • There is level 2 evidence (Schopp et al 2007) that a skills training project can improve knowledge in both consumers and personal assistants up to six months post-training.
  • There is insufficient evidence (Frost et al 1999) to determine the efficacy of training persons with disabilities to provide SCI attendant care.
  • There is Level 4 evidence (Mattson-Prince, 1997) suggesting that an independent living self-managed model for attendant care results in decreased costs, better health outcomes and life satisfaction, and fewer re-hospitalizations than agency-based care.
  • Goal-directed occupational therapy can achieve gains in role performance and improvements in life satisfaction.
  • Counselling on proper technique and hygiene for at least one session might reduce the risk of UTI to below threshold for individuals at risk for UTIs.
  • Re-hospitalization might be reduced after participation in an educational intervention involving a workshop, a collaborative home visit, and access to follow-up.
  • Skills development educational workshops for attendants and consumers can increase knowledge about spinal cord injury, wellness, and communication.
  • Directing, training, and financing one's personal attendant care may lead to financial savings, better health outcomes, and increased life satisfaction.

Summary

  • There is level 5 evidence (Forrest and Gombas 1995) that discharge from hospital was delayed for a significant portion of SCI patients due to lack of accessible housing, which leads to unnecessary increase of cost of care.
  • There is level 5 evidence (Fuhrer et al 1990) that ILCs with MRP relationships serve more clients than those without and that the most frequently serviced individuals are those with SCI who attend for peer counseling, skills training and discharge planning.
  • There is level 5 evidence (DeJong and Hughes 1982) that living with a spouse and/or children, living alone, or living with unrelated persons were more desirable arrangements than living with parents and spouse/children together, living with distant family (i.e. grandparents), or living with parents and siblings.
  • There is level 4 evidence (DeJong et al 1984) that marital status, transportation barriers, education level, medical supervision requirements, economic disincentives, services received, and severity of disability are predictors of independent living.
  • There is level 5 evidence  (Boschen 1996) that issues of choice and control are important when planning living situations and setting goals with clients because they are directly related to residential and life satisfaction.
  • There is level 5 evidence (Boschen 1990) that individuals with SCI have lower perceived life satisfaction, locus of control and satisfaction with certain aspects housing.
  • There is level 5 evidence (Boschen 1988) that accommodation options for a person with a disability are limited. The preferred accommodation is a private house or apartment.
  • There is level 5 evidence (Anzai et al 2006) that living with someone prior to SCI, having insurance or private funding for equipment, and being younger decrease the risk of being discharged to an extended care following SCI rehabilitation.
  • There is level 5 evidence (Cesar et al 2002) that individuals with SCI have a need for assistance with fire safety to increase their perception of home safety.
  • There is qualitative evidence (Bergmark et al 2008) that suggests individuals with SCI move multiple times after injury. In most cases they start living with their parents and/or in an institution before moving into their own homes.
  • There is level 5 evidence (Foster et al 2005; Robinson-Whelan and Rintala 2003) indicating that most informal caregivers are female spouses of SCI consumers who required additional assistance in fulfilling and maintaining provided services.
  • There is level 5 evidence (Berry et al 1995) suggesting general satisfaction with informal attendant services from both clients and attendants although there are variations with some aspects of care.
  • There is level 5 evidence (Weitzenkamp et al 2002) that the most significant predictors of PCA use are motor function, days spent in rehabilitation, and length of stay in a nursing home.
  • There is level 5 evidence (Bushnik et al 2007) indicating that personal attendant turnover is positively correlated with higher injury level and increased need for assistance in exercise and transfers.
  • There is qualitative evidence (Cockerill and Durham 1992) that both consumers and attendants agree that the emphasis of care in transitional centres should be placed on facilitating consumer independence which may be accomplished by delineating the role of attendants. 
  • There is level 1 evidence (Cohen and Schemm 2007) indicating that client-centred visits by an occupational therapist can increase the number of life roles performed and improve life satisfaction.
  • There is level 4 evidence (Barber et al. 1999) that suggests recurrent UTIs can be reduced below threshold levels through a simple cost-effective educational intervention by a clinical nurse.
  • There is level 4 evidence (Beck and Scroggins 2001) that suggests that health can be maintained after participation in an educational intervention focused on skill development and support in the “real world.”
  • There is level 2 evidence (Schopp et al 2007) that a skills training project can improve knowledge in both consumers and personal assistants up to six months post-training.
  • There is insufficient evidence (Frost et al 1999) to determine the efficacy of training persons with disabilities to provide SCI attendant care.
  • There is Level 4 evidence (Mattson-Prince, 1997) suggesting that an independent living self-managed model for attendant care results in decreased costs, better health outcomes and life satisfaction, and fewer re-hospitalizations than agency-based care.

Key Points

  • In many cases, discharge from hospital is delayed for SCI patients due to lack of accessible housing, which leads to unnecessary increase of cost of care.
  • Independent Living Centres (ILCs) that have relationships with hospital Medical Rehabilitation Programs (MRPs) serve more clients than those without, and the most frequently serviced individuals are those with SCI who attend for peer counseling, skills training, and discharge planning.
  • Living with a spouse and/or children, living alone, or living with unrelated persons are more desirable arrangements than living with parents and spouse/children together, living with distant family (i.e., grandparents), or living with parents and siblings.
  • Marital status, transportation barriers, education level, medical supervision requirements, economic disincentives, services received, and severity of disability are predictors of independent living.
  • Choice and control are important when planning living situations and setting goals with clients with SCI because they are directly related to residential and life satisfaction.
  • Individuals with SCI have lower perceived life satisfaction, locus of control, and satisfaction with certain aspects of housing than normative samples.
  • Accommodation options for a person with a disability are limited. The preferred accommodation is a private house or apartment.
  • Living with someone prior to SCI, having insurance or private funding for equipment, and being younger decrease the risk of being discharged to an extended care facility following SCI rehabilitation.
  • Individuals with SCI have a need for assistance with fire safety to increase their perception of home safety.
  • Individuals with SCI move multiple times after injury. In most cases they start living with their parents and/or in an institution before moving into their own homes.
  • Most informal caregivers are female spouses of individuals with SCI who require assistance in fulfilling and maintaining services.
  • There is general satisfaction with informal attendant services.
  • The most significant predictors of Personal Care Assistance (PCA) use are motor function, days spent in rehabilitation, and length of stay in a nursing home.
  • Personal attendant turnover is positively correlated with higher injury level and increased need for assistance in exercise and transfers.
  • Goal-directed occupational therapy can achieve gains in role performance and improvements in life satisfaction.
  • Re-hospitalization might be reduced after participation in an educational intervention involving a workshop, a collaborative home visit, and access to follow-up.
  • Counselling on proper technique and hygiene for at least one session might reduce the risk of urinary tract infections (UTIs) to below-threshold for individuals at risk for UTIs.
  • Workshops for attendants and consumers can increase knowledge about SCI.
  • Directing, training, and financing one’s personal attendant care may lead to financial savings, better health outcomes, and increased life satisfaction.

References

  • Adams N and Beatty P. Consumer-driven personal assistance services: Independent living, community integration and the vocational rehabilitation process. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation 1998; 10: 93-101.
  • Anzai K, Young J, MacCullum J, Miller B, Jongbloed L. Factors influencing discharge location following high lesion spinal cord injury rehabilitation in British Columbia, Canada. Spinal Cord 2006; 44: 11-18.
  • Barber DB, Woodard FL, Rogers SJ, Able AC. The efficacy of nursing education as an intervention in the treatment of recurrent urinary tract infections in individuals with spinal cord injury. SCI Nursing 1999;16(2):54-56.
  • Beck LA, Scroggins, LM. Optimizing health of individuals with tetraplegia. SCI Nursing 2001; 18(4):181-186.
  • Bergmark BA, Winograd CH, Koopman C. Residence and quality of life determinants for adults with tetraplegia of traumatic spinal cord injury etiology. Spinal Cord 2008 Oct;46(10):684-689.
  • Berry JF, Hitzman S, Stewart GW, Darwin P. A survey of attendant care arrangements in indigent persons with spinal cord injury. SCI Psychosocial Process 1995; 8(3):112-117.
  • Boschen KA. Housing options and preferences among urban-dwelling spinal cord injured young adults. Canadian Journal of Rehabilitation 1988; 2(1):31-40
  • Boschen KA. Life satisfaction, housing satisfaction and locus of control: A comparison between spinal cord injury and non-disabled individuals. Canadian Journal of Rehabilitation 1990; 4(2):75-85.
  • Boschen KA. Correlates of life satisfaction, residential satisfaction, and locus of control among adults with spinal cord injuries. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin 1996 6;39(4):230-243.
  • Boschen KA, Gargaro J. Experiential outcomes of the SCI support provider role. Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation 2009 14(4):69-87.
  • Boschen KA, Gargaro J, Tonack MI. Community integration and quality of life comparisons among spinal cord injured, support provider, and comparative samples. Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation (2005a) 10(4):116-134.
  • Boschen KA, Tonack, M, Gargaro, J. The impact of being a support provider to a person living in the community with a spinal cord injury.  Rehabilitation Psychology, (2005b). 50(4):397-407.
  • Bushnik T, Wright J and Burdsall D. Personal attendant turnover: Association with level of injury, burden of care, and psychosocial outcome. Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation 2007; 12(3):66-76.
  • Cesar KW, Garavan R, Laud P, Hayat M, Fiedler IG. Perceptions of environmental safety among individuals with spinal cord injury. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 2002;81(10):798-800.
  • Cockerill R, Durham N. Attendant care and its role in independent living as developed in transitional living centres. New England Journal of Human Services 1992; 11(2):17-22.
  • Cohen ME, Schemm RL. Client-centered occupational therapy for individuals with spinal cord injury. 2007; 21(3):1-15.
  • DeJong G, Branch LG, Corcoran PJ. Independent living outcomes in spinal cord injury: Multivariate analysis. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 1984; 65: 65-73
  • DeJong G, Hughes J. Independent living: Methodology for measuring long-term outcome. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 1982; 63: 68-73.
  • DeVivo MJ, Kartus PL, Stover SL. Cause of death for patients with spinal cord injuries. Archives of Internal Medicine 1989; 149: 1761-1776.
  • Forrest G, Gombas G. Wheelchair-accessible housing: Its role in cost containment in spinal cord injury. Arch.Phys.Med.Rehabil. 1995;76(5):450-452.
  • Foster M, Amsters D, Carlson G. Spinal cord injury and family caregivers: A description of care and perception of service need. Australian Journal of Primary Health 2005; 11(1):91-100.
  • Forchheimer M, Tate DG. Enhancing community re-integration following spinal cord injury. NeuroRehabilitation 2004;19(2):103-113.
  • Frost FS, Brennan D, Roach MJ. Opportunities in community placement: An innovative personal care assistant training program in the inner city. Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation 1999; 4(3):94-102.
  • Furher M J, Rossi LD, Gerken L, Nosek MA, Richards L. Relationships between Independent Living Centers and Medical Rehabilitation Services. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 1990; 71:519-522.
  • Harvey C, Wilson SE, Greene CG, Berkowitz M, Stripling TE. New estimates of the direct costs of traumatic spinal cord injuries: Results of a nationwide survey. Paraplegia 1992 30(12):834-850.
  • Heywood F. The health outcomes of housing adaptations. Disability & Society 2004 Mar;19(2):129-143.
  • Hoeman SP, Winters DM. Theory-based case management: High cervical spinal cord injury. Home Healthcare Nurse 1990; 8(1):25-33.
  • Holicky R. Caring for the caregivers: The hidden victims of illness and disability. Rehabilitation Nursing 1996; 21(5):247-252.
  • Johnson RL, Brooks CA, Whiteneck GG. Cost of traumatic spinal cord injury in a population-based registry. Spinal Cord 1996; 34(8):470-480.
  • Litvak S, Zukas H, Heumann J. Attending to America: Personal assistance for independent living – Report of the National Survey of Attendant Services Programs in the U.S. World Institute on Disability. Oakland, CA, pg 19: 1987.
  • Mattson-Prince J. A rational approach to long-term care: Comparing the independent living model with agency-based care for persons with high spinal cord injuries. Spinal Cord 1997: 35; 326-331.
  • McAweeney MJ, Forchheimer M, Tate DG. Identifying the unmet independent living needs of persons with spinal cord injury. J.Rehabil. 1996; 62(3):29-34.
  • Meyer M, Donelly M, Weerakoon P. ‘They’re taking the place of my hands’: Perspectives of people using personal care. Disability & Society 2007; 22(6):595-608.
  • Pomeranz J, Shaw LR, Sawyer HW, Velozo CA. Consensus among life care planners regarding activities to consider when recommending personal attendant care services for individuals with spinal cord injury: A Delphi study. Journal of Life Case Planning 2006; 5(1&2):7-22.
  • Robinson-Whelan S, Rintala DH. Informal care providers for veterans with SCI: Who are they and how are they doing? Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development 2003; 40(6):511-516.
  • Schopp LH, Clark MJ, Hagglund KJ, Mokelke EK, Stout BJ, Mazurek MO. Evaluation of a consumer-personal assistant training project. Disability and Rehabilitation 2007; 29(5):403-410.
  • Shackleford M, Farley T, Vines CL (1998). A comparison of women and men with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 1998; 36: 337-339.
  • Tate DG, Stiers W, Daugherty J, Forchheimer M, Cohen E, Hansen N. The effects of insurance benefits coverage on functional and psychosocial outcomes after spinal cord injury. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 1994a; 75: 407-414.
  • Tate DG, Forchheimer M, Maynard F, Dijkers M. Predicting depression and psychological distress in persons with spinal cord injury based on indicators of handicap. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 1994b; 73: 175-183.
  • Tate DG, Forchheimer M. Enhancing community reintegration after inpatient rehabilitation for persons with spinal cord injury. Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation 1998;4(1):42-55.
  • Weitzenkamp DA, Whiteneck GG, Lammertse DP. Predictors of personal care assistance for people with spinal cord injury. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 2002; 83: 1399-1405.

Lower Limb

Introduction

Loss of function in the lower limbs due to SCI can extend from complete paralysis to varying levels of voluntary muscle activation. The rehabilitation of lower extremity function after SCI has generally focused on the recovery of gait. Even when functional ambulation may not be possible (e.g. in complete tetraplegia), lower limb interventions can be targeted to maintain muscle health as well as reduce other complications, such as decreased cardiovascular health or osteoporosis. Minimizing the risk of these complications would ease health costs related to the treatment of these sequelae and also promote survivors’ participation in society as productive members of the workforce.

Conventional rehabilitation strategies for enhancing lower limb function after SCI have focused on range of motion and stretching, active exercises, electrical stimulation to strengthen functioning musculature, and functional training in daily mobility tasks. Standing and overground ambulation training are also important components of conventional rehabilitation using various bracing and assistive devices (O'Sullivan and Schmitz 1994; Somers 1992). In the last several years, we have seen increasing emphasis on providing task-specific training of functional movements, such as walking, with the help of body weight support and treadmills. We have also seen exciting advances in technology applications for facilitating or augmenting gait rehabilitation strategies, such as robotic devices for treadmill gait retraining (Hesse et al. 2004; Colombo et al. 2001) and the introduction of microstimulators for activating paralyzed muscles (Weber et al. 2004). In the following sections, we review evidence for the efficacy of these various lower limb rehabilitation interventions on lower limb muscle strength and ambulatory capacity following SCI. As will be evident from the review, injury level, severity, chronicity, as well as institutional resources must all be taken into account to help guide the clinical decision-making process and expected outcomes.

Lam T, Wolfe DL, Eng JJ, Domingo A (2010). Lower Limb Rehabilitation Following Spinal Cord Injury. In: Eng JJ, Teasell RW, Miller WC, Wolfe DL, Townson AF, Hsieh JTC, Connolly SJ, Mehta S, Sakakibara BM, editors. Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Evidence. Version 3.0. Vancouver: p 1-47.

Electrical Stimulation to Enhance Lower Limb Muscle Function

After SCI, it is well established that muscles experience deconditioning, especially those denervated following complete SCI. The most visible effect of deconditioning is muscle atrophy, characterized by a reduction in size of individual muscle fibers (Castro et al. 1999a; Castro et al. 1999b). Deconditioning is also associated with a complex cascade of biochemical events and alterations over time in muscle composition such as changes to muscle fiber type (Stewart et al. 2004; Round et al. 1993). Functionally, these changes manifest as loss of strength and endurance of muscular contractions and have been targets for various interventions. It should be noted that there might be additional benefits to enhancing muscle structure and function in addition to the immediate functional consequences of enhancing strength and endurance. For example, muscular contractions have the added potential of ameliorating loss of bone density following SCI. In addition, Anderson (2004) noted that future treatments developed for chronic SCI may require the reversal of muscle atrophy in order for benefits of the treatment to be detectable. Others have noted the potential health benefits (e.g., reduction in secondary conditions) that may be associated with reducing muscle atrophy and enhancing muscular strength and endurance (Shields and Dudley-Javoroski 2006). Various rehabilitation techniques have focused on reducing or reversing these detrimental changes to the muscles of the lower limb following SCI.

A variety of electrical stimulation techniques have been employed to enhance lower limb muscle structure and function in people with SCI. These typically involve delivering a series of electrical pulse trains to the muscle (or nerve supplying the muscle) over time such that it simulates the “normal” exercise experience. Specific stimulation parameters (i.e., pulse width, train duration, between train interval, method of application) and other exercise-related variables (i.e., frequency, duration, intensity, program length) may each be varied to attain an optimal training stimulus. Given the number and variety of these factors, it is not surprising that there is considerable heterogeneity among the specific electrical stimulation interventions that have been investigated to date. In the present review we focus on two strategies: patterned electrical stimulation (PES) and functional electrical stimulation (FES). Whereas both methods typically employ cyclical patterns of electrical stimulation that simulate natural muscular activity, FES is directed towards the attainment of purposeful movement such as cycling or walking. PES, on the other hand, is focused on producing muscle contractions that may be used to generate muscle force such as in an isometric condition. In some applications, PES techniques have been used as a training stimulus to prepare muscles for a subsequent FES training condition (e.g. Kern et al. 2005; Hjeltnes and Lannem 1990). In situations where increased muscle torque and endurance are primary goals to improve function, for example in the quadriceps in an incomplete SCI, the outcomes of these experimental studies have direct clinical relevance.

Patterned Electrical Stimulation (PES)

Table 1: PES Studies Examining Muscle Function and Morphology

Discussion

All studies involving PES and strength evaluated this in individuals with complete or motor complete SCI (Hjeltnes and Lannem 1990; Kagaya et al. 1996; Shields and Dudley-Javoroski 2006). In general, all studies produced beneficial results on muscle size (i.e., reduced muscle atrophy). In addition to enhancing muscle bulk, most interventions also focused on improving muscle function, most notably strength and endurance, as well as contractile speed and muscle fatigue.

The strongest study supporting the efficacy of PES was by Shields and Dudley-Javorski (2006), who employed an experimental non-RCT design to examine the effect of long-term (up to 3 years) PES exercise to unilateral ankle plantarflexor muscles with the untrained leg serving as a control. This study examined 7 males with complete and relatively recent injuries (~6 weeks post-injury). Peak stimulated ankle torque (i.e, non-voluntary) was found to be significantly greater in the stimulated leg as compared to the untrained leg. The trained side also generated significantly higher torque-time integrals than the untrained side (p<0.05). Other pre-post study designs of PES-assisted exercise also found increased stimulated muscle forces or torques following training although the subjects involved in these studies were generally more chronic (Sabatier et al. 2006; Kagaya et al. 1996; Hjeltnes and Lannem 1990;).

Conclusion

  • There is level 2 evidence (Baldi et al. 1998) that PES-assisted isometric exercise reduces the degree of lower limb muscle atrophy in individuals with recent (~10 weeks post-injury) motor complete SCI, but not to the same extent as a comparable program of FES-assisted cycling exercise.
  • There is level 4 evidence (Sabatier et al. 2006) that PES-assisted exercise may partially reverse the lower limb muscle atrophy found in individuals with long-standing (>1 year post-injury) motor complete SCI.
  • There is level 2 evidence (Shields and Dudley-Javoroski 2006) that a program of PES-assisted exercise increases lower limb strength and muscular endurance.
  • PES programs are beneficial in preventing and restoring lower limb muscle atrophy as well as improving lower limb muscle strength and endurance.

Functional Electrical Stimulation

Table 2: FES Studies Examining Muscle Function and Morphology

Discussion

In general, all studies reviewed involving FES produced beneficial results on muscle functions such as strength and endurance or muscle structure such as increased muscle size (i.e., reduced muscle atrophy). FES may have additional benefits over PES alone. In particular, the study by Baldi et al. (1998) should be highlighted as it was the only randomized, controlled trial (n=26) which compared FES (cycle ergometry exercise), PES (isometric exercise) and an untrained control group. These investigators assessed lean body mass in 3 distinct body areas (i.e., total body, lower limb, gluteal) as a marker of muscle atrophy in recently injured (approximately 10 weeks) individuals with motor complete SCI. Their results demonstrate that the FES-assisted cycling program is effective in reducing atrophy and resulted in relative increases in lean body mass in all areas after 3 and 6 months of participation. The PES-assisted isometric exercise group also reduced muscle atrophy but had intermediate results between FES and no treatment (their control group actually loss lean mass).

Reversal of muscle atrophy also appears feasible in more longstanding complete or motor-complete SCI (i.e, > 2 years post-injury) as shown by increases in muscle cross-sectional area and the muscle/adipose tissue ratio using FES-cycling (Crameri et al. 2002; Scremin et al. 1999). However, controlled trials in chronic SCI are lacking.

Note that PES is often used to strengthen the atrophied muscles to some extent prior to FES (Kern et al. 2005) and in some cases, FES is not possible unless PES is first used. Kern et al. (2005) used a progressive PES - FES program for quadriceps building eventually leading to FES-assisted standing in people with longstanding complete cauda equina injuries (>1.2 years post-injury). These investigators demonstrated increases to the overall mean fiber diameter and the proportion of total cross-sectional area covered by muscle fibers with training as compared to an untrained group. However, the feasibility of providing life-long stimulation therapy to subjects with denervation injuries is uncertain.

There was one null finding associated with muscle atrophy in that Gerrits et al. (2000) employed a relatively shorter program of 6 weeks of FES-assisted cycling exercise in people with longstanding motor complete SCI (> 1 year post-injury) and found no change in muscle size. These non-significant results might be due to the relative insensitivity of the measure of thigh circumference, especially with the short intervention period and the absence of a control group for comparison purposes.

In addition to improving muscle properties, FES-cycling can improve work output and endurance (Crameri et al. 2002; Gerrits et al. 2000). For example, Gerrits et al. (2000) used a short (6 weeks) pre-post trial of FES-assisted cycling intervention in people with motor complete SCI and found an increased resistance to fatigue in the quadriceps muscle and greater work output.

Some mechanistic investigations have been conducted which help to explain some of these adaptations to muscle morphology and function with ongoing electrical stimulation exercise programs. For example, using FES-assisted cycling, Koskinen et al. (2000) demonstrated an increase in total collagen content as well as up- and down-regulation of proteins consistent with muscle-building activity. Others have noted an adaptive response to FES-assisted cycling exercise that serves to limit or alter the shift in the oxidative properties or fibre type composition of muscles that typically occurs following SCI (Crameri et al. 2002).

Conclusion

  • There is level 2 evidence (Baldi et al. 1998) that FES-assisted cycling exercise prevents and reverses lower limb muscle atrophy in individuals with recent (~10 weeks post-injury) motor complete SCI and to a greater extent than PES.
  • There is level 4 evidence (Scremin et al. 1999; Crameri et al. 2002) that FES may partially reverse the lower limb muscle atrophy found in individuals with long-standing (>1 year post-injury) motor complete SCI.
  • There is level 4 evidence (Gerrits et al. 2000) that FES-assisted cycle exercise may increase lower limb muscular endurance.
  • FES-assisted exercise is beneficial in preventing and restoring lower limb muscle atrophy as well as improving lower limb muscle strength and endurance in motor complete SCI.

Gait Retraining Strategies to Enhance Functional Ambulation

Body-weight Supported Treadmill Training (BWSTT)

It has been more than a decade now since it was first demonstrated that body-weight supported treadmill training (BWSTT) in animals can enhance locomotor activity after spinal cord transection (Edgerton et al. 1991; Barbeau and Rossignol 1987). In this approach, partial body weight support is provided by a harness suspended from the ceiling or a frame while limb stepping movements are assisted by a moving treadmill belt. Since then, BWSTT strategies have been introduced as a promising approach to improve ambulatory function in people with SCI (Barbeau and Blunt 1991). This area of research has raised much excitement and interest among rehabilitation specialists and neuroscientists.

In this review, we focus on the BWSTT intervention studies that report functional ambulation outcome measures (such as walking speed or endurance). These studies tend to focus on individuals with incomplete SCI lesions as the recovery of overground functional ambulation has not been shown in people with clinically complete spinal lesions (Waters et al. 1992). Although modulation of muscle (EMG) activity during body weight support treadmill-assisted stepping in individuals with complete SCI lesions has been shown (Dietz and Muller 2004 Grasso et al. 2004; Wirz et al. 2001;  Dietz et al. 1998; Wernig et al. 1995; Dietz et al. 1995; Faist et al. 1994), there has not been any evidence for functional ambulatory gains in this sub-population.

In people with incomplete SCI, much motor recovery already occurs within the first 2 months post-injury; the rate of further recovery then decelerates over the next 3 to 6 months (Burns and Ditunno 2001). For the purposes of this review, we defined SCI <12 months post-injury as acute/sub-acute and SCI >12months post-injury as chronic.

BWSTT in Acute/Sub-acute SCI

Table 3: Studies using BWSTT in acute/subacute in SCI (<12 months postinjury)

Discussion

Four studies (summarized in Table 3) have examined the effect of therapist-assisted (Dobkin et al. 2007; Dobkin et al. 2006; Wernig et al. 1998; Wernig et al. 1995) BWSTT in people who had incurred an incomplete SCI <12 months prior (acute/subacute phase) (aggregate N=255). Treatment time ranged from 150-300 minutes per week and total treatment duration lasted between 3 and 23 weeks.

Although lower levels of study design (non-randomized, non-blinded) suggest that BWSTT in acute/sub-acute SCI yields better outcomes than conventional rehabilitation (Wernig et al. 1995), there exists strong evidence from a single-blind RCT (Dobkin et al. 2006) (n=117) that there are no differences in effects between matched amounts of  BWSTT and overground mobility practice in incomplete SCI during inpatient rehabilitation for the locomotor score of the FIM or overground walking speed. These two variables in both groups improved roughly in parallel over the 12 weeks of therapy (Dobkin et al. 2007). In both groups, improvements in walking function were particularly notable in subjects with AIS C (92%) or D (100%). Indeed, as reported by Dobkin et al (2006), the initial AIS classification of subjects is an important indicator of locomotor recovery. Among the subjects who were initially classified as AIS B, those who improved to AIS C within 8 weeks post-injury showed improved walking function while those who remained as AIS B did not (Dobkin et al. 2006). In addition, subjects who entered the trial earlier (< 4 weeks post-injury) had faster walking speeds and endurance post-training. This was particularly the case for subjects who improved in their AIS classification within 4 to 6 weeks post-injury.

Wernig et al. (1995; 1998) showed that 86% (49/57) of incomplete SCI subjects who underwent BWSTT in the acute phase of injury achieved improvements in functional ambulation. They reported that only 50% of the initially non-ambulatory subjects (historical controls) who underwent conventional rehabilitation improved functional ambulation. The results of the remaining 16 historical control subjects who were initially ambulatory were not explicitly reported, although it appears from the article’s bar graphs that they also improved in functional class. Thus, it is possible that the proportion of subjects who improved functional ambulation after Wernig’s conventional rehabilitation may actually have been closer to 70% ([16+12]/40).

The results of the recent RCT (Dobkin et al. 2006) has sparked intense debate among gait rehabilitation researchers (Dietz 2006; Wernig 2006a; 2006b). A contentious issue has been the appropriateness of the control intervention (Wolpaw JR 2006). The ‘conventional’ rehabilitation to which BWSTT was compared was not well defined in Wernig’s studies, although it appeared to focus on wheelchair mobility in addition to gait training in parallel bars and using braces (Wernig 2006a). The control group in the large RCT (Dobkin et al. 2006) underwent task-oriented overground gait retraining of equivalent intensity to the BWSTT group and therefore may not have offered enough of a contrast in treatment modality to detect significant differences. However, these studies do show that intensive task-oriented gait retraining, whether implemented by BWSTT or overground practice, facilitates the recovery of functional ambulation especially <12 months postinjury. However, there is no strong evidence that one rehabilitation approach is superior to another.

Conclusion

  • There is level 3 evidence (Wernig et al. 1995) using historical controls that BWSTT is effective in improving ambulatory function. However, stronger evidence from one level 1 RCT (Dobkin et al. 2006) demonstrates that BWSTT has equivalent effects to conventional rehabilitation consisting of an equivalent amount of overground mobility practice for gait outcomes in acute/sub-acute SCI.
  • For patients less than 12 months post-SCI, body weight supported treadmill training has equivalent effects on gait outcomes to conventional rehabilitation consisting of overground mobility practice

BWSTT in Chronic SCI

Table 4: Studies Using Treadmill Training in Chronic SCI (>1 year post-injury)

Discussion

As shown in Table 4, there have been 7 pre-post studies, 3 RCT (Musselmand et al. 2009; Nooijen et al. 2009; Field-Fote et al. 2005) 1 prospective Controlled Trial (Gorassini et al. 2008) and 1 case-control study (Wernig et al. 1995) that altogether studied 226 persons with incomplete SCI, with chronicity ranging from 1 to 28 years post-injury. Treatment intensity ranged from 45 to 300 minutes per week, and treatment duration lasted between 3 and 48 weeks. Based on the stated primary outcome measure of each study, about 64% of all subjects across these studies showed some improvement following treatment.

There are two small RCTs that compared functional ambulation outcomes among four different approaches to gait training: manual- or robot-assisted BWSTT, BWSTT+FES, and overground gait training (Nooijen et al 2009; Field-Fote et al. 2005). For gait speed measured over a short distance (6 meters), participants in the BWSTT+FES group and those in the overground gait training group showed better outcomes compared to participants in the manual- or robot-assisted BWSTT group. However, for walking speed measured over a longer distance (24.4 m), there were no significant differences among the four groups (Field-Fote et al. 2005). Thus, there is level 1 evidence that these different modes of gait training result in similar effects on gait speed over longer distances. Additional analysis of the quality of the gait pattern also revealed that all these different modes of gait training yielded improvements in over ground walking cadence, step length, and stride length. Greatest improvements were seen in individuals who trained with FES and the least improvements were seen in individuals who trained with the Lokomat (Nooijen et al 2009).

Subjects with initially-slower walking speeds (< 0.10 m/s walking speed) tend to make the most improvements in locomotor function. Subjects with initially high walking capacity (> 0.10 m/s gait speed) or severely impaired, initially non-ambulatory subjects tend to show little improvement after gait retraining (Wernid et al. 1998, Wernig et al. 1995). Note that a large percent improvement from an initially low walking speed can be a result of the mathematics. More recent analysis of walking outcomes post-training showed that time post-injury, voluntary bowel and bladder voiding, functional spasticity, and walking speed before training were the strongest predictors of post-training overground walking speed (Winchester et al 2009). Taken from data from 30 subjects, this model could predict 78% of the variance of final walking speed. Of additional clinical interest is an understanding of how gains in walking speed translate to everyday function. For people with paraplegia, it has been suggested that an overground walking speed of at least 0.9 m/s is necessary for community ambulation (Cerny et al. 1980). Nevertheless, even modest gains in walking speed after treadmill training have been reported to translate into meaningful enhancements in daily function (Field-Fote et al. 2005).

Alternative gait retraining therapies or modified approaches to BWSTT for chronic SCI are being introduced. A more recent study has presented preliminary data for 4 individuals with chronic SCI comparing BWSTT with over ground skilled walking training (Musselman et al. 2009). The skilled walking training consisted of task-specific practice (without body weight support) of various gait tasks, such as stair climbing, obstacle crossing, and walking along sloped surfaces. In this small group of subjects, there was a tendency for participants to show better improvement in functional ambulation scores following skilled training vs. BWSTT, particularly in those who were more chronic (> 4 years post-SCI). Thus skilled walking training may provide additive benefits to those individuals who have already recovered some ambulatory capacity several years after their injury (Musselman et al. 2009).

Conclusion

  • There is level 1 evidence from 1 RCT (Field-Fote et al. 2005) that different strategies for implementing body weight support gait retraining all yield similar ambulatory outcomes in people with chronic, incomplete SCI. It is recommended that therapists may choose a body weight support gait retraining strategy based on available resources (Field-Fote et al. 2005).
  • There is level 4 evidence from pre-test/post-test studies (Winchester et al 2009; Hicks et al. 2005; Wirz et al. 2005; Thomas and Gorassini 2005; Protas et al. 2001; Wernig et al. 1998) that BWSTT is effective for improving ambulatory function in people with chronic, incomplete SCI.
  • Body weight-support gait training strategies can improve gait outcomes in chronic, incomplete SCI, but no body weight-support strategy (overground, treadmill, with FES) is more effective.

Special Case Report: Spinal Cord Stimulation Combined with BWSTT

There are 2 published reports (Carhart et al. 2004; Herman et al. 2002) describing the effects of epidural spinal cord stimulation combined with gait training in a single subject (male with incomplete tetraplegia, 43 years old, injury level C5-C6, AIS C, 3.5 years post-injury). The subject first underwent 12 weeks of BWSTT that resulted in some significant improvements in treadmill gait parameters although overground ambulation remained limited. Subsequently, the subject underwent surgical implantation of an epidural stimulation system placed over the T10-T12 vertebral level. BWSTT and overground gait training in combination with epidural stimulation commenced after surgical healing. The combination of epidural spinal cord stimulation with gait training resulted in a substantial improvement in treadmill gait parameters as well as in overground ambulation. The subject reported a decreased sense of effort, a doubling in walking speed, and increased walking endurance when assisted by spinal cord stimulation. This was associated with improved community and indoor functional ambulation. Obviously, controlled trials of this specific intervention are required before spinal cord stimulation combined with locomotor training can be recommended as a useful rehabilitation strategy. Nevertheless, this special case report highlights one of the innovative and exciting possibilities of technology.

Combined Gait Training and Pharmacological Interventions

Drugs such as clonidine (a noradrenergic agonist), cyproheptadine (a serotonergic antagonist), baclofen (GABA agonist), GM-1 ganglioside, L-Dopa and 4-aminopyridine have been used in association with attempts to improve ambulation in individuals with SCI. The results from animal studies indicate that some of these drugs may act on the receptors in the spinal cord which facilitate interaction with a locomotor central pattern generator (spinal circuits which produce coordinated locomotor movement) (Chau et al. 1998; Rossignol et al. 1996; Barbeau and Rossignol 1990). Although not conclusive, there is some evidence that similar “central pattern generator” circuits exist in humans (Bussel et al. 1996; Illis 1995; Calancie et al. 1994; Bussel et al. 1989; Bussel et al. 1988;) and provide the rationale for clinical use of these drugs.

Table 5: Studies of combined gait training and pharmacological agents

Discussion

The interactions of these pharmacological interventions are complex and appear to affect walking ability and spasticity to varying effects.  The studies on clonidine (oral or intrathecal), cyproheptadine and baclofen demonstrate improvements in various aspects of gait (i.e. walking speed, posture, spasticity), but no improvements led to significant functional changes in walking.  Norman et al. (1998) found the greatest improvements in more severely disabled subjects and in many cases, the effects were retained following washout of clonidine. Bradycardia and hypotension, common side-effects of oral clonidine can be ameliorated with intrathecal injection of clonidine (150-450µg) (Filos et al. 1994).  The combined effect of different drugs has not been well explored.  One very small study (not tabled due to its small sample size of 2 subjects) (Fung et al. 1990) showed that a combination of Clonidine, Cyproheptadine and treadmill training improved SCI locomotion in 2 subjects.

Conflicting evidence exists on the use of GM-1 ganglioside for neurologic recovery for walking in SCI.  The small RCT conducted by Walker and Harris (1993) (N=9) concluded that the use of GM-1 ganglioside improved motor scores, walking distance and walking speed in chronic SCI subjects. A large scale multicenter RCT (n=760) (Geisler et al. 2001) suggested that although GM-1 treatment may have accelerated initial SCI recovery (at 8 weeks), it did not improve the final extent of recovery (26 weeks). However, walking ability was not assessed.

Immediate release, 4-aminopyridine capsules have been shown to have no benefit to ambulation as indicated by 2 RCTs (van der Bruggen et al. (2001), n=20; DeForge et al. (2004), n=15).  However, the study of van der Bruggen et al.(2001) was not directed solely at exploring the effects on walking and therefore the heterogenous nature of the subject groups may have confounded the ambulation results. Furthermore, differences in intervention (i.e. up-titration to 15-45mg/day over 4 weeks in van der Bruggen et al. (2001) vs. up to 10mg 4X/day for 2 weeks in DeForge et al, (2004)) and the lack of consistent clinically relevant outcome measures complicates the interpretation of the available evidence. 

Two of the studies noted above used a combination of pharmacological and physical therapy gait training interventions. One high-quality randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded crossover study (Walker and Harris 1993) (N=9) provided level 1 evidence that a combination of physical therapy (including gait training) and GM-1 ganglioside improved motor scores, walking distance, and walking speed in chronic SCI participants compared to physical therapy plus placebo. Other results from the pre-test/post-test study conducted by Fung et al. (1990) provide level 4 evidence that clonidine and cyproheptadine in conjunction with BWSTT may be effective in enabling nonambulatory incomplete SCI patients to achieve overground ambulation with assistive devices.

A more recent study examined the effects of combining L-Dopa (dopamine precursor) with gait retraining in a group of individuals with acute/sub-acute incomplete SCI (Maric et al. 2008). Unlike the promising effects of L-Dopa on motor recovery following stroke (Scheidtmann et al. 2001), there was no added benefit in this SCI group. Although spinal neural circuits can certainly undergo plastic changes, the results of this study suggest that dopaminergic neurons may not have been sufficiently stimulated by the dosage used here, or that they may not contribute to motor recovery associated with gait retraining.

Conclusion

  • There exists level 1 evidence (Walker and Harris 1993), limited by a small sample size, that GM-1 ganglioside combined with physical therapy improves walking ability in chronic incomplete SCI patients. There is limited level 4 evidence (Fung et al. 1990) that clonidine and cyproheptadine use in conjunction with BWSTT enhances walking ability in non-ambulatory incomplete SCI patients such that overground ambulation with assistive devices can be achieved.
  • There is limited evidence for the benefits of combining the use of certain pharmacological agents with gait training on ambulation in individuals with SCI.

Special Case Report: Nutrient Supplement to Augment Walking Distance

A recent report demonstrated the potential benefits of a nutrient supplement ingested after fatiguing ambulation on gait parameters over a 2-week period (Nash et al. 2007). Subjects were randomized to receive either a blended drink containing whey protein and carbohydrate or a placebo control consisting of soy protein in the first 2 weeks of training. Following a 2-week washout period, subjects returned to receive the other supplement. After 2-weeks of ingesting the whey protein and carbohydrate supplement post-exercise, subjects were able to walk longer and farther than if they ingested the placebo control. Whey protein and carbohydrate supplements are commonly used to facilitate recovery following intense exercise in the able-bodied population. This is the first report to demonstrate the potential benefits of such nutrient supplementation in the SCI population.

Table 6: Nutrient Supplement to Augment Walking Distance

Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES)

The idea of compensating for paralyzed function using electrical stimulation was introduced as early as the 1960s (Liberson et al. 1961). Functional electrical stimulation of the common peroneal nerve was found to be effective in assisting foot clearance during the swing phase (Liberson et al. 1961). There has also been a report of attempts to stimulate the ankle plantarflexor muscles to assist push-off at the end of stance and enhance the initiation of the swing phase in subjects with incomplete SCI (Bajd et al. 1999). Approaches that focus on swing phase activity are more suitable for less severely disabled individuals who have adequate balance to support their stance leg during gait. There are also more complex systems that involve several channels of stimulation that support proper extension as well as foot clearance during swing (e.g. Sigmedics 2000). These are more suitable for patients who require assistance in standing as well as gait, such as those with neurologically complete SCI. FES systems such as the Parastep or ALT-2 provide stimulation of thigh extensor muscles (quadriceps, gluteal muscles) to support extension and standing, as well as stimulation of the common peroneal nerve to assist with swing phase movements. FES may also be combined with bracing to counter trunk and hip instability (Solomonow et al. 1997).

One of the limitations of surface FES is possible skin irritation, discomfort under the electrodes, or difficulties with proper positioning of the electrodes. With improvements in electronics technology, FES systems have become smaller and more practical for everyday use. In addition, some patients have opted for implanted FES systems that may be inserted without surgery. These systems offer a more precise delivery of stimulation, enabling greater muscle selectivity, and the ability to access deeper muscles, such as the hip flexors (Kobetic et al. 1997). Percutaneous electrodes, which are inserted through the skin with a hypodermic needle, offer one possibility to circumvent complications with surface electrodes (Kobetic et al. 1997; Marsolais and Kobetic 1986). However, there may be complications due to infection or irritation at the site of insertion, and electrode movement or breakage (Agarwal et al. 2003). More recently, there was a case study reporting positive effects with a BION microstimulator in an incomplete tetraplegic subject with drop-foot (Weber et al. 2004). Thus, preliminary reports of the use of such innovative FES technology are promising, but further study is warranted to determine the long-term stability and efficacy of such implanted systems.

Table 7: Studies Using Functional Electrical Stimulation to Improve Locomotor Function

Discussion

To date, there are no randomized controlled or blinded assessments of the training effects of FES to improve mobility after SCI. Furthermore, only three of the studies reviewed here (Thrasher et al. 2006; Granat et al. 1993; Klose et al. 1997) report specific usage parameters for FES during gait rehabilitation, whereby FES was applied for at least 30 minutes, 2 to 5 times/week for up to 4.5 months. In the remainder of the studies, participants were provided with FES systems to use at home “as much as possible” or “as desired” over the course of the study (Ladouceur and Barbeau 2000a; 2000b; Wieler et al. 1999Stein et al. 1993). Results from the ten pre-post studies included here show that almost all the participants showed improvements in gait parameters (walking speed or distance) when FES was used (Thrasher et al. 2006; Ladouceur and Barbeau 2000a; 2000b; Wieler et al. 1999; Klose et al. 1997; Granat et al. 1993; Stein et al. 1993; Granat et al. 1992). This is not surprising, given that the FES could compensate for weakened or paralyzed muscle function during gait. Of greater interest is the finding of carryover effects after FES training. Several investigators have also reported a carryover effect after FES training such that improvements in functional ambulation (e.g. overground walking speed and distance, step length) persisted even when the stimulator was turned off (Ladouceur and Barbeau 2000b; Wieler et al. 1999). This suggests that neuroplastic changes may have taken place in response to regular use of FES during walking. Indeed, it has been shown in non-disabled human subjects that the combination of treadmill walking and FES led to an acute increase in corticospinal excitability that persists even after the cessation of FES (Kido Thompson and Stein 2004). Improved muscle strength and conditioning after regular use of FES could also contribute to carryover effects in walking function (Granat et al. 1993).

Although laboratory studies advocate the efficacy of FES systems for improving ambulatory function in patients with SCI, the effectiveness of any technology is only as good as its acceptance by the intended users. Wieler et al. (1999) reported that the majority of their subjects found they could use the FES device easily on a regular basis and that they walked better with the FES. Those who reported difficulties reported problems with finding the proper stimulation site or technical difficulties with the leads, switches, or electrodes. There have also been reports of musculoskeletal complications such as ankle sprain, calcaneum fracture, back pain, or falls with FES use (Brissot et al. 2000; Gallien et al. 1995). Some of these complications may have been associated with commencement of upright exercise (gait) after a period of being non-ambulatory. Anecdotal reports found in several studies suggest that most subjects mainly use FES indoors or at home, for short distance walking, to prevent complications due to prolonged immobilization, and to enhance physical fitness rather than functional community ambulation (Brissot et al. 2000; Gallien et al. 1995; Klose et al. 1997). Subjects who do use FES outdoors for community ambulation tend to be those less severely impaired (Brissot et al. 2000; Granat et al. 1993).

The functional benefits derived from FES are also quite variable. For instance, Stein et al. (1993) report that most subjects showed a modest improvement in gait speed (average: 4 m/min), which was more significant for the more severely disabled subjects. Higher-functioning subjects felt that this small benefit in gait speed did not warrant the daily use of FES. In contrast, Ladouceur and Barbeau (2000b) reported that there was a tendency for the subjects with initially faster gait speed to have greater absolute improvements. Thus, outcomes from FES-use also seem to be quite variable in terms of walking speed (Ladouceur and Barbeau 2000b; Stein et al. 1993) or distance (Klose et al. 1997).

Conclusion

  • FES-assisted walking can enable walking or enhance walking speed in incomplete SCI or complete (T4-T11) SCI. Regular use of FES in gait training or activities of daily living can lead to improvement in walking even when the stimulator is not in use.

Table 8: Studies Combining Functional Electrical Stimulation with Gait Training to Improve Locomotor Function

Discussion

Findings from four studies, including one high-quality RCT (Field-Fote et al. 2005) and three pretest/posttest (Field-Fote 2001; Field-Fote and Tepavac 2002; Hesse et al. 2004) studies, demonstrated favourable outcomes when BWSTT was combined with FES in people with chronic, incomplete SCI. There was level 1 evidence for an overall enhancement of short-distance functional ambulation, as measured by overground gait speed over 6 meters, when BWSTT was combined with FES of the common peroneal nerve (Field-Fote 2001; Field-Fote et al. 2005; Field-Fote and Tepavac 2002). There is level 4 evidence from one pretest/posttest study suggesting that BWSTT combined with FES to the quadriceps and hamstrings muscles enhances functional ambulation (Hesse et al. 2004).

Orthoses/Braces

Bracing alone in SCI

There are several available devices used for bracing the legs in order to support standing and walking function, particularly for people with complete SCI. These range from single-joint bracing (e.g. ankle-foot orthosis), which are usually for individuals with low, incomplete spinal lesions, to whole-leg/long-leg braces that extend from the lower back to the ankle. Among the most common long-leg braces studied in the literature are the purely mechanical Parawalker (Rose 1979) or the Reciprocating Gait Orthosis (RGO) (Douglas et al. 1983). These devices may also be combined with FES to augment gait function and efficiency (Marsolais et al. 2000; Nene and Patrick 1990; Yang et al. 1996). These devices must be used with a walking aid (e.g. crutches or walker) for functional ambulation.

Table 9: Studies of Bracing Interventions in SCI

 

Discussion

Our search criteria yielded 2 pretest/posttest studies (Nakazawa et al. 2004; Saitoh et al. 1996) and 10 posttest-only studies (Marsolais et al. 2000; Scivoletto et al. 2000, Massucci et al. 1998; Franceschini et al. 1997; Harvey et al. 1997; Sykes et al. 1996b; Thoumie et al. 1995; Lotta et al. 1994; Winchester et al. 1993; Whittle et al. 1991) that reported the effects of training with braces. Subjects in the pretest/posttest studies (aggregate N=8) participated in 5 times/week gait training sessions with long-leg braces for at least 2 weeks. Overall, these 12 studies provided level 4 evidence that long-leg braces may facilitate the ability of people with subacute or chronic complete paraplegia to stand independently and to achieve some functional ambulation skills, such as stepping up on curbs or climbing stairs, with assistive devices. The maximum walking speeds achieved with orthosis use ranged from 0.13 to 0.63 m/s (Nakazawa et al. 2004; Massucci et al. 1998; Harvey et al. 1997; Saitoh et al. 1996; Sykes et al. 1996b; Thoumie et al. 1995; Winchester et al. 1993; Whittle et al. 1991), which is 13 to 57% of the optimal speed (1.1 m/s) required for successful community ambulation (Robinett and Vondran 1988). In general, however, the use of any of the braces investigated in these studies did not greatly enhance the ability of complete paraplegic subjects to be fully independent for functional community ambulation (Scivoletto et al. 2000; Harvey et al. 1997; Hong et al. 1990). In a few studies, some subjects demonstrated the ability to climb up and down stairs with the assistance of crutches or walker (Franceschini et al. 1997; Harvey et al. 1997; Whittle et al. 1991). Thus, the greatest benefit derived from orthosis/brace-use is from enhanced home or indoor mobility, for general exercise and health benefits, and psychological benefits from attaining upright posture and standing (Sykes et al. 1996b; Hong et al. 1990; Mikelberg and Reid 1981).

The successful use of orthoses/braces is also dependent on other more individual and practical factors. It has been recommended that orthoses or braces are best for people who are well-motivated, with complete SCI at T9 or below or incomplete SCI at any level, with good postural control and good level of fitness (Franceschini et al. 1997; Thoumie et al. 1995; Hong et al. 1990). Suzuki et al. (2007) showed that injury level, age, motivation, upper extremity strength, as well as spasticity and contractures were predictive of gait outcomes in long-leg brace users. Medical problems such as limited thoraco-lumbar mobility or mechanical back pain, or any musculoskeletal problems that make standing upright uncomfortable also tend to interfere with successful use of these orthoses/braces (Harvey et al. 1997; Middleton et al. 1997).

The ability for a patient to don/doff the orthosis without difficulty and relatively quickly (e.g. <5 minutes) also appears to enhance the probability of their acceptance (Scivoletto et al. 2000; Franceschini et al. 1997; Harvey et al. 1997; Saitoh et al. 1996; Thoumie et al. 1995; Hong et al. 1990; Mikelberg and Reid 1981). Frequent reports of technical problems (e.g. mechanical breakdown at the hinges, improper fitting) across many studies (Scivoletto et al. 2000; Harvey et al. 1997; Thoumie et al. 1995; Whittle et al. 1991; Mikelberg and Reid 1981) suggest that appropriate technical support of these mechanical devices is necessary to enhance ongoing use of these braces (Whittle et al. 1991).

Overall, it appears that most subjects feel that the difficulties and inconvenience encountered with orthoses/braces and the modest increase in function do not warrant their acceptance for regular, daily use in functional activities (Harvey et al. 1997; Sykes et al. 1996b; Hong et al. 1990; Mikelberg and Reid 1981). It has been suggested that the therapeutic benefits of orthosis-use (e.g. health benefits from standing practice) should be stressed to patients rather than setting forth an expectation that they will enhance functional ambulation and be a replacement for wheelchair-use (Franceschini et al. 1997). However, it must be noted that for people with incomplete SCI, bracing (AFO-use) alone during walking can enhance gait speed and endurance compared to walking without an AFO (Kim et al. 2004).

Conclusion

  • None of the studies investigating the effectiveness of brace/orthotic devices for upright support and mobility are randomized or blinded, but that is in part due to the ethical dilemma of providing safe and appropriate bracing and the fact that participants will be able to distinguish which device they received. There is weak evidence from post-test studies (Scivoletto et al. 2000; Franceschini et al. 1997) that bracing alone results in significant gains in functional ambulation for people with complete SCI. Two studies reported pre-test/post-test results (Nakazawa et al. 2004; Saitoh et al. 1996) (total n = 8) that the use of long-leg braces could enhance gait speed and endurance in people with complete SCI.
  • There is limited evidence that bracing alone does not enable significant gains in functional ambulation for people with complete SCI. The advantages of bracing appear largely restricted to the general health and well-being benefits related to practice of standing and the ability to ambulate short-distances in the home or indoor settings. The benefits of bracing-alone on functional ambulation are primarily with people with
    incomplete spinal lesions

Bracing Combined with FES in SCI

Energy expenditure of walking facilitated by bracing alone inSCI is extremely high and contributes to its low use. Hybrid systems combine conventional bracing with FES to activate large lower extremity muscles in the hopes of improving the gait pattern and reduce upper extremity exertion. The FES is used to improve trunk and hip stability and to facilitate forward progression.

Table 10: Studies of Bracing Interventions combined with FES in SCI

Discussion

Our search criteria yielded 6 post-test studies (Marsolais et al. 2000; Solomonow et al. 1997; Sykes et al. 1996a; Sykes et al. 1996b; Yang et al. 1996; Thoumie et al. 1995) that examined the combined effect of lower extremity bracing with FES on functional ambulation in people with complete SCI (aggregate N = 115). The data from these studies provide level 4 evidence that the combination of long-leg bracing and FES may enable overground ambulation of between 180 and 1400 m at one time (Marsolais et al. 2000; Solomonow et al. 1997; Sykes et al. 1996a; Thoumie et al. 1995). There does not seem to be much further benefit of combining FES with orthosis-use in terms of maximal walking speed (Sykes et al. 1996b; Yang et al. 1996; Thoumie et al. 1995), although greater walking distance may be achieved (Marsolais et al. 2000; Thoumie et al. 1995). Three pretest/posttest studies (Marsolais et al. 2000; Yang et al. 1996; Thoumie et al. 1995; and one posttest study (Sykes et al. 1996b) directly compared the effect of bracing+FES with either FES or bracing alone. When subjects walked with either braces or FES alone, maximum walking distance ranged from 3 to 400 m. When braces were combined with FES, maximum distance increased to 200 to 1400 m (Marsolais et al. 2000; Sykes et al. 1996b; Thoumie et al. 1995).

Biomechanical studies (not included in the summary tables if they did not have a training period) provide some insight into the relative benefits of FES versus bracing. One study that compared FES-alone with bracing-alone found that FES provides a particular advantage in facilitating sit-to-stand movements and donning the system (Bonaroti et al. 1999). However, mobility (e.g. walking, stairs) once standing was achieved was not found to be different between FES and bracing. In incomplete SCI, FES-use was found to result in greater benefits in terms of walking speed while bracing alone (with an AFO) was found to be particularly advantageous for improving walking distance (Kim et al. 2004). However, the combination of AFO with FES provided improved gait benefits than either device used alone (Kim et al. 2004).

Conclusion

  • There is level 4 evidence (Yang et al. 1996) that a combined approach of bracing and FES results in additional benefit to functional ambulation in paraplegic patients with complete SCI. However, in subjects who achieve little benefit from bracing alone, the addition of FES appears to help improve standing or short-distance walking function (Marsolais et al. 2000). In incomplete SCI, however, there is some indication that a combination of bracing and FES provides greater ambulatory function than either approach alone (Kim et al. 2004).
  • There is limited evidence that a combined approach of bracing and FES results in additional benefit to functional ambulation in paraplegic patients with complete SCI.

Whole-Body Vibration for Gait Rehabilitation

A recent report demonstrated the potential benefits of whole-body vibration administered for 3 minutes a day for 12 sessions over a 4-week period (Ness & Field-Fote 2009). Following this training period, the authors reported a mean improvement in walking speed of 0.062 m/s, which although statistically significant, was considered a small effect size. Training was also associated with an increase in cadence and hip-knee inter-joint coordination. Although whole-body vibration has been introduced for other neurological disorders such as Parkinson’s disease, this is the first report to demonstrate the potential benefits of whole-body vibration in the SCI population.

Table 11: Whole-Body Vibration for Gait Rehabilitation

Conclusion

Enhancing Strength Following Locomotor Training

Much research is focused on the development of effective therapies directed at enhancing locomotion. Typically, as noted earlier in this chapter, the majority of these investigations focus on individuals with incomplete SCI and also predominately employ ambulation-related outcome measures. However, some investigators have also examined the effect of locomotor training on enhancing lower limb strength as a secondary measure, or in other cases have examined the relationship between changes in lower limb strength and walking ability. For the most part, these therapies include a form of body-weight supported treadmill training. In these therapies, the patient’s limb movements may also be assisted by any (or a combination) of the following: therapist, appropriately timed stimulation (i.e., FES) or a robotically controlled servo-mechanism (Hornby et al. 2005; Wirz et al. 2005; Field-Fote 2001; Wernig et al. 1998; Wernig et al. 1995). In other locomotor studies involving strength measures, locomotor training consisted of overground walking assisted by FES (Granat et al. 1993) or a combination of this with treadmill and biofeedback training (Petrofsky 2001). In the present section, the outcomes associated with the strength benefits of these studies will be presented.

Table 12: Locomotor Training Studies Examining strength Measures

Discussion

In general, investigators have noted significant increases of lower limb strength following locomotor training – despite variations between training protocols and specific methods employed. Outcome measures have included manual muscle testing of individual lower limb muscles in incomplete SCI or summated scores of several muscles (Hornby et al. 2005; Wirz et al. 2005; Field-Fote 2001; Wernig et al. 1998; Wernig et al. 1995; Granat et al. 1993). Most recent studies have adhered to AIS international guidelines for manual muscle testing (Hornby et al. 2005; Wirz et al. 2005; Field-Fote 2001). Others have employed muscle torque measurements by employing strain gauge transducers (Petrofsky 2001; Granat et al. 1993), a dynamometer, or twitch interpolation technique (Jayaraman et al. 2008).

All investigators have reported increases in lower limb muscle strength in individuals with chronic SCI. However, several investigators have noted that enhanced walking capability was not necessarily associated with parallel increases in strength (Wirz et al. 2005; Field-Fote 2001; Wernig et al. 1998; Wernig et al. 1995). Furthermore, the clinical relevance of the small strength gains following locomotor training is questionable when considering the duration and complexity of the intervention (Field-Fote 2001). However, there is weak evidence (from 1 study, n = 3) that significant improvements in muscle strength may be realized when locomotor training is combined with conventional therapy (Hornby et al. 2005). In a more recent study that examined the effects of a 12-week resistance and plyometric training program, improvements in knee extensor and ankle plantarflexor torque production were accompanied by >30% improvement in gait speed (Gregory et al. 2007).

Detecting group differences in strength gains during the acute phase may be more challenging given the natural recovery. Wernig et al. (1995) found no differences between those provided locomotor training versus those treated conventionally in muscle strength gains. However, specific subject characteristics were inadequately described other than stating that body-weight supported treadmill training was initiated within a few weeks (i.e., 2-20 weeks, median 7 weeks) following injury. There was also a lack of standardized assessment, further confounding the findings.

Conclusion

  • There is level 4 evidence (Field-Fote 2001) that most forms of locomotor training (i.e., including body weight supported treadmill training with various assists and FES-assisted overland training) increase lower limb muscle strength in chronic SCI as indicated by overall increases in total lower extremity motor scores.
  • There is level 3 evidence (Wernig et al. 1995) that body weight supported treadmill training is not significantly different than conventional rehabilitation therapy in enhancing lower limb muscle strength in acute SCI, although these studies are confounded by the natural recovery that may take place in the acute period.
  • There is level 4 evidence (Gregory et al. 2007) that a resistance and plyometric training program can enable improvements in overground gait speed in chronic incomplete SCI.
  • Locomotor training programs are beneficial in improving lower limb muscle strength although in acute SCI similar strength increases may be obtained with conventional rehabilitation. The real benefit of locomotor training on muscle strength may be realized when it is combined with conventional therapy. This should be further explored in acute, incomplete SCI where better functional outcomes may be realized with the combination of therapies.

Summary

The studies reviewed here suggest that facilitating the practice of walking during rehabilitation can enhance the recovery of functional ambulation in incomplete SCI. Although specific treatment parameters that depend on the injury location, severity, and chronicity remain to be elucidated, there exists some evidence to help guide the clinical decision-making process. Task-oriented gait retraining with partial body weight support, whether provided by a treadmill and partial BWS or overground with assistive devices, appears to be more beneficial when applied sooner rather than later after the onset of injury in people with motor-incomplete lesions. Where resources permit, therapists may use a body-weight support system combined with a treadmill and manual assistance from additional personnel to implement task-oriented gait training. However, there is increasing evidence that equivalent outcomes can be obtained independent of the specific gait retraining strategy (Dobkin et al. 2006; Field-Fote et al. 2005). Some recent preliminary evidence suggests that gait training strategies may also be potentiated by nutrient supplements (Nash et al. 2007) or resistance training of specific muscles (Gregory et al. 2007).

For individuals with more chronic spinal lesions and who have recovered some walking, FES may provide additional gains in functional ambulation. When resources are available, more complex FES systems, with or without bracing, may be used to provide support of upright mobility in individuals with complete paraplegia. Further evidence is required to determine whether combination therapies offer significant advantages over any given approach alone. Future studies should also examine the role of falls risk and history in ambulatory performance following SCI. Early evidence suggests that the more active a person is, the less likely that they will experience a fall (Brotherton et al. 2007). Finally, although this review has focused on functional ambulation outcomes following various rehabilitation strategies, we must also keep in mind the additional health benefits (e.g. improved cardiovascular or bone health) of performing gait exercises.

  • There is level 2 evidence (Baldi et al. 1998) that PES-assisted isometric exercise reduces the degree of lower limb muscle atrophy in individuals with recent (~10 weeks post-injury) motor complete SCI, but not to the same extent as a comparable program of FES-assisted cycling exercise.
  • There is level 4 evidence (Sabatier et al. 2006) that PES-assisted exercise may partially reverse the lower limb muscle atrophy found in individuals with long-standing (>1 year post-injury) motor complete SCI.
  • There is level 2 evidence (Shields and Dudley-Javoroski 2006) that a program of PES-assisted exercise increases lower limb strength and muscular endurance.
  • There is level 2 evidence (Baldi et al. 1998) that FES-assisted cycling exercise prevents and reverses lower limb muscle atrophy in individuals with recent (~10 weeks post-injury) motor complete SCI and to a greater extent than PES.
  • There is level 4 evidence (Scremin et al. 1999; Crameri et al. 2002) that FES may partially reverse the lower limb muscle atrophy found in individuals with long-standing (>1 year post-injury) motor complete SCI.
  • There is level 4 evidence (Gerrits et al. 2000) that FES-assisted cycle exercise may increase lower limb muscular endurance.
  • There is level 3 evidence (Wernig et al. 1995) using historical controls that BWSTT is effective in improving ambulatory function. However, stronger evidence from one level 1 RCT (Dobkin et al. 2006) demonstrates that BWSTT has equivalent effects to conventional rehabilitation consisting of an equivalent amount of overground mobility practice for gait outcomes in acute/sub-acute SCI.
  • There is level 1 evidence from 1 RCT (Field-Fote et al. 2005) that different strategies for implementing body weight support gait retraining all yield similar ambulatory outcomes in people with chronic, incomplete SCI. It is recommended that therapists may choose a body weight support gait retraining strategy based on available resources (Field-Fote et al. 2005).
  • There is level 4 evidence from pre-test/post-test studies (Winchester et al 2009; Hicks et al. 2005; Wirz et al. 2005; Thomas and Gorassini 2005; Protas et al. 2001; Wernig et al. 1998) that BWSTT is effective for improving ambulatory function in people with chronic, incomplete SCI.
  • There exists level 1 evidence (Walker and Harris 1993), limited by a small sample size, that GM-1 ganglioside combined with physical therapy improves walking ability in chronic incomplete SCI patients.
  • There is limited level 4 evidence (Norman et al. 1998) that clonidine and cyproheptadine use in conjunction with BWSTT enhances walking ability in non-ambulatory incomplete SCI patients such that overground ambulation with assistive devices can be achieved.
  • There is level 4 evidence (Thrasher et al. 2006; Ladouceur and Barbeau 2000a; 2000b; Wieler et al. 1999; Klose et al. 1997; Granat et al. 1993; Stein et al. 1993; Granat et al. 1992) that FES-assisted walking can enhance walking speed and distance in complete and incomplete SCI.
  • There is level 4 evidence from 2 independent laboratories (Ladouceur and Barbeau 2000a,b; Wieler et al. 1999) that regular use of FES in gait training or activities of daily living leads to persistent improvement in walking function that is observed even when the stimulator is not in use.
  • None of the studies investigating the effectiveness of brace/orthotic devices for upright support and mobility are randomized or blinded, but that is in part due to the ethical dilemma of providing safe and appropriate bracing and the fact that participants will be able to distinguish which device they received. There is weak evidence from post-test studies (Scivoletto et al. 2000; Franceschini et al. 1997) that bracing alone results in significant gains in functional ambulation for people with complete SCI. Two studies reported pre-test/post-test results (Nakazawa et al. 2004; Saitoh et al. 1996) (total n = 8) that the use of long-leg braces could enhance gait speed and endurance in people with complete SCI.
  • There is level 4 evidence (Yang et al. 1996) that a combined approach of bracing and FES results in additional benefit to functional ambulation in paraplegic patients with complete SCI. However, in subjects who achieve little benefit from bracing alone, the addition of FES appears to help improve standing or short-distance walking function (Marsolais et al. 2000). In incomplete SCI, however, there is some indication that a combination of bracing and FES provides greater ambulatory function than either approach alone (Kim et al. 2004).
  • There is level 4 evidence that whole body vibration improves walking function (Ness & Field-Fote, 2009).
  • There is level 4 evidence (Field-Fote 2001) that most forms of locomotor training (i.e., including body weight supported treadmill training with various assists and FES-assisted overland training) increase lower limb muscle strength in chronic SCI as indicated by overall increases in total lower extremity motor scores.
  • There is level 3 evidence (Wernig et al. 1995) that body weight supported treadmill training is not significantly different than conventional rehabilitation therapy in enhancing lower limb muscle strength in acute SCI, although these studies are confounded by the natural recovery that may take place in the acute period.
  • There is level 4 evidence (Gregory et al. 2007) that a resistance and plyometric training program can enable improvements in overground gait speed in chronic incomplete SCI.

Key Points

  • PES programs are beneficial in preventing and restoring lower limb muscle atrophy as well as improving lower limb muscle strength and endurance.
  • FES-assisted exercise programs are beneficial in preventing and restoring lower limb muscle atrophy as well as improving lower limb muscle strength and endurance in motor complete SCI.
  • For patients less than 12 months post-SCI, body weight supported treadmill training has equivalent effects on gait outcomes to conventional rehabilitation consisting of overground mobility practice.
  • Body weight-support gait training strategies can improve gait outcomes in chronic, incomplete SCI, but no body weight-support strategy (overground, treadmill, with FES) is more effective.
  • There is limited evidence for the benefits of combining the use of certain pharmacological agents with gait training on ambulation in individuals with SCI.
  • FES-assisted walking can enable walking or enhance walking speed in incomplete SCI or complete (T4-T11) SCI. Regular use of FES in gait training or activities of daily living can lead to improvement in walking even when the stimulator is not in use.
  • There is limited evidence that bracing alone does not enable significant gains in functional ambulation for people with complete SCI. The advantages of bracing appear largely restricted to the general health and well-being benefits related to practice of standing and the ability to ambulate short-distances in the home or indoor settings. The benefits of bracing-alone on functional ambulation are primarily with people with incomplete spinal lesions.
  • There is limited evidence that a combined approach of bracing and FES results in additional benefit to functional ambulation in paraplegic patients with complete SCI.
  • Locomotor training programs are beneficial in improving lower limb muscle strength although in acute SCI similar strength increases may be obtained with conventional rehabilitation. The real benefit of locomotor training on muscle strength may be realized when it is combined with conventional therapy. This should be further explored in acute, incomplete SCI where better functional outcomes may be realized with the combination of therapies.

References

  • Adams MM, Ditor DS, Tarnopolsky MA, Phillips SM, McCartney N, and Hicks AL. The effect of body weight-supported treadmill training on muscle morphology in an individual with chronic, motor-complete spinal cord injury: A case study. J Spinal Cord Med 2006;29: 167-171.
  • Agarwal S, Kobetic R, Nandurkar S, and Marsolais EB. Functional electrical stimulation for walking in paraplegia: 17-year follow-up of 2 cases. J Spinal Cord Med 2003;26: 86-91.
  • Anderson KD. Targeting recovery: priorities of the spinal cord-injured population. J Neurotrauma 2004;21: 1371-1383.
  • Bajd T, Kralj A, Stefancic M, and Lavrac N. Use of functional electrical stimulation in the lower extremities of incomplete spinal cord injured patients. Artificial Organs 1999;23: 403-409.
  • Baldi JC, Jackson RD, Moraille R, and Mysiw WJ. Muscle atrophy is prevented in patients with acute spinal cord injury using functional electrical stimulation. Spinal Cord 1998;36: 463-469.
  • Barbeau H, and Blunt R. A novel approach using body weight support to retrain gait in spastic paretic subjects. In: Plasticity of Motoneuronal Connections, edited by Wernig A. New York, NY: Elsevier Science, 1991, p. 461-474.
  • Barbeau H, and Rossignol S. The effects of serotonergic drugs on the locomotor pattern and on cutaneous reflexes of the adult chronic spinal cat. Brain Res 1990;514: 55-67.
  • Barbeau H, and Rossignol S. Recovery of locomotion after chronic spinalization in the adult cat. Brain Res 1987;412: 84-95.
  • Behrman AL, Lawless-Dixon AR, Davis SB, Bowden MG, Nair P, Phadke C, Hannold EM, Plummer P, and Harkema SJ. Locomotor training progression and outcomes after incomplete spinal cord injury. Phys Ther 2005;85: 1356-1371.
  • Belanger M, Stein RB, Wheeler GD, Gordon T, and Leduc B. Electrical stimulation: can it increase muscle strength and reverse osteopenia in spinal cord injured individuals? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000;81: 1090-1098.
  • Bonaroti D, Akers JM, Smith BT, Mulcahey MJ, and Betz RR. Comparison of functional electrical stimulation to long leg braces for upright mobility for children with complete thoracic level spinal injuries. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80: 1047-1053.
  • Brissot R, Gallien P, Le Bot MP, Beaubras A, Laisne D, Beillot J, and Dassonville J. Clinical experience with functional electrical stimulation-assisted gait with Parastep in spinal cord-injured patients. Spine 2000;25: 501-508.
  • Brotherton SS, Krause JS, and Nietert PJ. A pilot study of factors associated with falls in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med 2007;30: 243-250.
  • Burns AS, and Ditunno JF. Establishing prognosis and maximizing functional outcomes after spinal cord injury: a review of current and future directions in rehabilitation management. Spine 2001;26: S137-145.
  • Bussel B, Roby-Brami A, Azouvi P, Biraben A, Yakovleff A, and Held JP. Myoclonus in a patient with spinal cord transection. Possible involvement of the spinal stepping generator. Brain 1988;111 ( Pt 5): 1235-1245.
  • Bussel B, Roby-Brami A, Neris OR, and Yakovleff A. Evidence for a spinal stepping generator in man. Electrophysiological study. Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars) 1996;56: 465-468.
  • Bussel B, Roby-Brami A, Yakovleff A, and Bennis N. Late flexion reflex in paraplegic patients. Evidence for a spinal stepping generator. Brain Res Bull 1989;22: 53-56.
  • Calancie B, Needham-Shropshire B, Jacobs P, Willer K, Zych G, and Green BA. Involuntary stepping after chronic spinal cord injury. Evidence for a central rhythm generator for locomotion in man. Brain 1994;117 ( Pt 5): 1143-1159.
  • Carhart MR, He J, Herman R, D'Luzansky S, and Willis WT. Epidural spinal-cord stimulation facilitates recovery of functional walking following incomplete spinal-cord injury. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2004;12: 32-42.
  • Carvalho de Abreu DC, Junior AC, Rondina JM, and Cendes F. Muscle hypertrophy in quadriplegics with combined electrical stimulation and body weight support training. Int J Rehabil Res 2008;31: 171-175.
  • Castro MJ, Apple DF, Jr., Hillegass EA, and Dudley GA. Influence of complete spinal cord injury on skeletal muscle cross-sectional area within the first 6 months of injury. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1999a;80: 373-378.
  • Castro MJ, Apple DF, Jr., Staron RS, Campos GE, and Dudley GA. Influence of complete spinal cord injury on skeletal muscle within 6 mo of injury. J Appl Physiol 1999b;86: 350-358.
  • Cerny D, Waters R, Hislop H, and Perry J. Walking and wheelchair energetics in persons with paraplegia. Phys Ther 1980;60: 1133-1139.
  • Chau C, Barbeau H, and Rossignol S. Early locomotor training with clonidine in spinal cats. J Neurophysiol 1998;79: 392-409.
  • Colombo G, Wirz M, and Dietz V. Driven gait orthosis for improvement of locomotor training in paraplegic patients. Spinal Cord 2001;39: 252-255.
  • Crameri RM, Weston A, Climstein M, Davis GM, and Sutton JR. Effects of electrical stimulation-induced leg training on skeletal muscle adaptability in spinal cord injury. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2002;12: 316-322.
  • de Abreu DC, Cliquet A, Jr., Rondina JM, and Cendes F. Electrical stimulation during gait promotes increase of muscle cross-sectional area in quadriplegics: a preliminary study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009;467: 553-557.
  • DeForge D, Nymark J, Lemaire E, Gardner S, Hunt M, Martel L, Curran D, and Barbeau H. Effect of 4-aminopyridine on gait in ambulatory spinal cord injuries: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial. Spinal Cord 2004;42: 674-685.
  • Dietz V. Good clinical practice in neurorehabilitation. The Lancet Neurology 2006;5: 377-378.
  • Dietz V, Colombo G, Jensen L, and Baumgartner L. Locomotor capacity of spinal cord in paraplegic patients. Ann Neurol 1995;37: 574-582.
  • Dietz V, and Muller R. Degradation of neuronal function following a spinal cord injury: mechanisms and countermeasures. Brain 2004;
  • Dietz V, Wirz M, Colombo G, and Curt A. Locomotor capacity and recovery of spinal cord function in paraplegic patients: a clinical and electrophysiological evaluation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1998;109: 140-153.
  • Dobkin B, Apple D, Barbeau H, Basso M, Behrman A, Deforge D, Ditunno J, Dudley G, Elashoff R, Fugate L, Harkema S, Saulino M, and Scott M. Weight-supported treadmill vs over-ground training for walking after acute incomplete SCI. Neurology 2006;66: 484-493.
  • Dobkin B, Barbeau H, Deforge D, Ditunno J, Elashoff R, Apple D, Basso M, Behrman A, Fugate L, Harkema S, Saulino M, Scott M, and Trial Group TS. The evolution of walking-related outcomes over the first 12 weeks of rehabilitation for incomplete traumatic spinal cord injury: the multicenter randomized spinal cord injury locomotor trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2007;21: 25-35.
  • Douglas R, Larson PF, D'Ambrosia R, and McCall RE. The LSU reciprocation-gait orthosis. Orthopedics 1983;6: 834-839.
  • Duffell LD, Donaldson Nde N, Perkins TA, Rushton DN, Hunt KJ, Kakebeeke TH, and Newham DJ. Long-term intensive electrically stimulated cycling by spinal cord-injured people: effect on muscle properties and their relation to power output. Muscle Nerve 2008;38: 1304-1311.
  • Edgerton VR, de Guzman CP, Gregor RJ, Roy RR, Hodgson JA, and Lovely RG. Trainability of the spinal cord to generate hindlimb stepping patterns in adult spinalized cats. In: Neurobiological basis of human locomotion, edited by Shimamura M, Grillner S, and Edgerton VR. Tokyo: Japan Scientific Societies, 1991, p. 411-423.
  • Effing TW, van Meeteren NL, van Asbeck FW, and Prevo AJ. Body weight-supported treadmill training in chronic incomplete spinal cord injury: a pilot study evaluating functional health status and quality of life. Spinal Cord 2006;44: 287-296.
  • Faist M, Mazevet D, Dietz V, and Pierrot-Deseilligny E. A quantitative assessment of presynaptic inhibition of Ia afferents in spastics. Differences in hemiplegics and paraplegics. Brain 1994;117 ( Pt 6): 1449-1455.
  • Field-Fote EC. Combined use of body weight support, functional electric stimulation, and treadmill training to improve walking ability in individuals with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82: 818-824.
  • Field-Fote EC, Lindley SD, and Sherman AL. Locomotor training approaches for individuals with spinal cord injury: a preliminary report of walking-related outcomes. J Neurol Phys Ther 2005;29: 127-137.
  • Field-Fote EC, and Tepavac D. Improved intralimb coordination in people with incomplete spinal cord injury following training with body weight support and electrical stimulation. Phys Ther 2002;82: 707-715.
  • Filos KS, Goudas LC, Patroni O, and Polyzou V. Hemodynamic and analgesic profile after intrathecal clonidine in humans. A dose-response study. Anesthesiology 1994;81: 591-601; discussion 527A-528A.
  • Franceschini M, Baratta S, Zampolini M, Loria D, and Lotta S. Reciprocating gait orthoses: a multicenter study of their use by spinal cord injured patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997;78: 582-586.
  • Fung J, Stewart JE, and Barbeau H. The combined effects of clonidine and cyproheptadine with interactive training on the modulation of locomotion in spinal cord injured subjects. J Neurol Sci 1990;100: 85-93.
  • Gallien P, Brissot R, Eyssette M, Tell L, Barat M, Wiart L, and Petit H. Restoration of gait by functional electrical stimulation for spinal cord injured patients. Paraplegia 1995;33: 660-664.
  • Geisler FH, Coleman WP, Grieco G, and Poonian D. The Sygen multicenter acute spinal cord injury study. Spine 2001;26: S87-98.
  • Gerrits HL, de Haan A, Sargeant AJ, Dallmeijer A, and Hopman MT. Altered contractile properties of the quadriceps muscle in people with spinal cord injury following functional electrical stimulated cycle training. Spinal Cord 2000;38: 214-223.
  • Gorassini MA, Norton JA, Nevett-Duchcherer J, Roy FD, and Yang J. Changes in locomotor muscle activity after treadmill training in subjects with incomplete spinal cord injury. J Neurophysiol 2009;101: 969-979.
  • Granat M, Keating JF, Smith AC, Delargy M, and Andrews BJ. The use of functional electrical stimulation to assist gait in patients with incomplete spinal cord injury. Disabil Rehabil 1992;14: 93-97.
  • Granat MH, Ferguson AC, Andrews BJ, and Delargy M. The role of functional electrical stimulation in the rehabilitation of patients with incomplete spinal cord injury--observed benefits during gait studies. Paraplegia 1993;31: 207-215.
  • Grasso R, Ivanenko YP, Zago M, Molinari M, Scivoletto G, and Lacquaniti F. Recovery of forward stepping in spinal cord injured patients does not transfer to untrained backward stepping. Exp Brain Res 2004;157: 377-382.
  • Gregory CM, Bowden MG, Jayaraman A, Shah P, Behrman A, Kautz SA, and Vandenborne K. Resistance training and locomotor recovery after incomplete spinal cord injury: a case series. Spinal Cord 2007;45: 522-530.
  • Haapala SA, Faghri PD, and Adams DJ. Leg joint power output during progressive resistance FES-LCE cycling in SCI subjects: developing an index of fatigue. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2008;5: 14.
  • Harvey LA, Smith MB, Davis GM, and Engel S. Functional outcomes attained by T9-12 paraplegic patients with the walkabout and the isocentric reciprocal gait orthoses. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997;78: 706-711.
  • Herman R, He J, D'Luzansky S, Willis W, and Dilli S. Spinal cord stimulation facilitates functional walking in a chronic, incomplete spinal cord injured. Spinal Cord 2002;40: 65-68.
  • Hesse S, Werner C, and Bardeleben A. Electromechanical gait training with functional electrical stimulation: case studies in spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2004;42: 346-352.
  • Hicks AL, Adams MM, Martin Ginis K, Giangregorio L, Latimer A, Phillips SM, and McCartney N. Long-term body-weight-supported treadmill training and subsequent follow-up in persons with chronic SCI: effects on functional walking ability and measures of subjective well-being. Spinal Cord 2005;43: 291-298.
  • Hjeltnes N, and Lannem A. Functional neuromuscular stimulation in 4 patients with complete paraplegia. Paraplegia 1990;28: 235-243.
  • Hong C, San Luis EB, and Chung S. Follow-up study on the use of leg braces issues to spinal cord injury patients. Paraplegia 1990;28: 172-177.
  • Illis LS. Is there a central pattern generator in man? Paraplegia 1995;33: 239-240.
  • Janssen TW, and Pringle DD. Effects of modified electrical stimulation-induced leg cycle ergometer training for individuals with spinal cord injury. J Rehabil Res Dev 2008;45: 819-830.
  • Jayaraman A, Shah P, Gregory C, Bowden M, Stevens J, Bishop M, Walter G, Behrman A, and Vandenborne K. Locomotor training and muscle function after incomplete spinal cord injury: case series. The journal of spinal cord medicine 2008;31: 185-193.
  • Kagaya H, Shimada Y, Sato K, and Sato M. Changes in muscle force following therapeutic electrical stimulation in patients with complete paraplegia. Paraplegia 1996;34: 24-29.
  • Kern H, Rossini K, Carraro U, Mayr W, Vogelauer M, Hoellwarth U, and Hofer C. Muscle biopsies show that FES of denervated muscles reverses human muscle degeneration from permanent spinal motoneuron lesion. J Rehabil Res Dev 2005;42: 43-53.
  • Kido Thompson A, and Stein RB. Short-term effects of functional electrical stimulation on motor-evoked potentials in ankle flexor and extensor muscles. Exp Brain Res 2004;159: 491-500.
  • Kim CM, Eng JJ, and Whittaker MW. Effects of a simple functional electric system and/or a hinged ankle-foot orthosis on walking in persons with incomplete spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85: 1718-1723.
  • Klose KJ, Jacobs PL, Broton JG, Guest RS, Needham-Shropshire BM, Lebwohl N, Nash MS, and Green BA. Evaluation of a training program for persons with SCI paraplegia using the Parastep 1 ambulation system: part 1. Ambulation performance and anthropometric measures. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997;78: 789-793.
  • Kobetic R, Triolo RJ, and Marsolais EB. Muscle selection and walking performance of multichannel FES systems for ambulation in paraplegia. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 1997;5: 23-29.
  • Koskinen SO, Kjaer M, Mohr T, Sorensen FB, Suuronen T, and Takala TE. Type IV collagen and its degradation in paralyzed human muscle: effect of functional electrical stimulation. Muscle Nerve 2000;23: 580-589.
  • Ladouceur M, and Barbeau H. Functional electrical stimulation-assisted walking for persons with incomplete spinal injuries: changes in the kinematics and physiological cost of overground walking. Scand J Rehabil Med 2000a;32: 72-79.
  • Ladouceur M, and Barbeau H. Functional electrical stimulation-assisted walking for persons with incomplete spinal injuries: longitudinal changes in maximal overground walking speed. Scand J Rehabil Med 2000b;32: 28-36.
  • Liberson WT, Holmquest HJ, Scot D, and Dow M. Functional electrotherapy: stimulation of the peroneal nerve synchronized with the swing phase of the gait of hemiplegic patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1961;42: 101-105.
  • Liu CW, Chen SC, Chen CH, Chen TW, Chen JJ, Lin CS, and Huang MH. Effects of functional electrical stimulation on peak torque and body composition in patients with incomplete spinal cord injury. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2007;23: 232-240.
  • Lotta S, Fiocchi A, Giovannini R, Silverstrin R, Tesio L, Raschi A, Macchia L, Chiapatti V, Zambelli M, and Tosi C. Restoration of gait with orthoses in thoracic paraplegia: a multicentric investigation. Paraplegia 1994;32: 608-615.
  • Maric O, Zorner B, and Dietz V. Levodopa therapy in incomplete spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma 2008;25: 1303-1307.
  • Marsolais EB, and Kobetic R. Implantation techniques and experience with percutaneous intramuscular electrodes in the lower extremities. J Rehabil Res Dev 1986;23: 1-8.
  • Marsolais EB, Kobetic R, Polando G, Ferguson K, Tashman S, Gaudio R, Nandurkar S, and Lehneis HR. The Case Western Reserve University hybrid gait orthosis. J Spinal Cord Med 2000;23: 100-108.
  • Massucci M, Brunetti G, Piperno R, Betti L, and Franceschini M. Walking with the advanced reciprocating gait orthosis (ARGO) in thoracic paraplegic patients: energy expenditure and cardiorespiratory performance. Spinal Cord 1998;36: 223-227.
  • Middleton JW, Yeo JD, Blanch L, Vare V, Peterson K, and Brigden K. Clinical evaluation of a new orthosis, the 'walkabout', for restoration of functional standing and short distance mobility in spinal paralysed individuals. Spinal Cord 1997;35: 574-579.
  • Mikelberg R, and Reid S. Spinal cord lesions and lower extremity bracing: an overview and follow-up study. Paraplegia 1981;19: 379-385.
  • Musselman KE, Fouad K, Misiaszek JE, and Yang JF. Training of walking skills overground and on the treadmill: case series on individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury. Phys Ther 2009;89: 601-611.
  • Nakazawa K, Kakihana W, Kawashima N, Akai M, and Yano H. Induction of locomotor-like EMG activity in paraplegic persons by orthotic gait training. Exp Brain Res 2004;157: 117-123.
  • Nash MS, Meltzer NM, Martins SC, Burns PA, Lindley SD, and Field-Fote EC. Nutrient supplementation post ambulation in persons with incomplete spinal cord injuries: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled case series. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007;88: 228-233.
  • Nene AV, and Patrick JH. Energy cost of paraplegic locomotion using the ParaWalker--electrical stimulation "hybrid" orthosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1990;71: 116-120.
  • Ness LL and Field-Fote EC. Whole-body vibration improves walking function in individuals with spinal cord injury: A pilot study. Gait and Posture 2009;30: 436-440.
  • Nooijen CFJ, Hoeve Nt and Field-Fote EC. Gait quality is improved by locomotors training in individual with SCI regardless of training approach. J of NeuroEng and Rehab 2009;6: 36-47.
  • Norman KE, Pepin A, and Barbeau H. Effects of drugs on walking after spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 1998;36: 699-715.
  • O'Sullivan SB, and Schmitz TJ. Physical rehabilitation: assessment and treatment. Philadelphia: F. A. Davis Company, 1994.
  • Petrofsky JS. The use of electromyogram biofeedback to reduce Trendelenburg gait. Eur J Appl Physiol 2001;85: 491-495.
  • Postans NJ, Hasler JP, Granat MH, and Maxwell DJ. Functional electric stimulation to augment partial weight-bearing supported treadmill training for patients with acute incomplete spinal cord injury: a pilot study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85: 604-610.
  • Protas EJ, Holmes SA, Qureshy H, Johnson A, Lee D, and Sherwood AM. Supported treadmill ambulation training after spinal cord injury: a pilot study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82: 825-831.
  • Rick Hansen Man in Motion Foundation. About SCI & Links http://www.rickhansen.com. [September 1, 2007, 2007].
  • Remy-Neris O, Barbeau H, Daniel O, Boiteau F, Bussel B. Effects of intrathecal clonidine injection on spinal reflexes and human locomotion in incomplete subjects. Exp Brain Res.1999; 129: 433-440.
  • Robinett CS, and Vondran MA. Functional ambulation velocity and distance requirements in rural and urban communities. A clinical report. Phys Ther 1988;68: 1371-1373.
  • Rose GK. The principles and practice of hip guidance articulations. Prosthet Orthot Int 1979;3: 37-43.
  • Rossignol S, Chau C, Brustein E, Belanger M, Barbeau H, and Drew T. Locomotor capacities after complete and partial lesions of the spinal cord. Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars) 1996;56: 449-463.
  • Round JM, Barr FM, Moffat B, and Jones DA. Fibre areas and histochemical fibre types in the quadriceps muscle of paraplegic subjects. J Neurol Sci 1993;116: 207-211.
  • Sabatier MJ, Stoner L, Mahoney ET, Black C, Elder C, Dudley GA, and McCully K. Electrically stimulated resistance training in SCI individuals increases muscle fatigue resistance but not femoral artery size or blood flow. Spinal Cord 2006;44: 227-233.
  • Saitoh E, Suzuki T, Sonoda S, Fujitani J, Tomita Y, and Chino N. Clinical experience with a new hip-knee-ankle-foot orthotic system using a medial single hip joint for paraplegic standing and walking. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1996;75: 198-203.
  • Scheidtmann K, Fries W, Muller F, and Koenig E. Effect of levodopa in combination with physiotherapy on functional motor recovery after stroke: a prospective, randomised, double-blind study. Lancet 2001;358: 787-790.
  • Scivoletto G, Petrelli A, Lucente LD, Giannantoni A, Fuoco U, D'Ambrosio F, and Filippini V. One year follow up of spinal cord injury patients using a reciprocating gait orthosis: preliminary report. Spinal Cord 2000;38: 555-558.
  • Scremin AM, Kurta L, Gentili A, Wiseman B, Perell K, Kunkel C, and Scremin OU. Increasing muscle mass in spinal cord injured persons with a functional electrical stimulation exercise program. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80: 1531-1536.
  • Segal JL, and Brunnemann SR. 4-Aminopyridine alters gait characteristics and enhances locomotion in spinal cord injured humans. J Spinal Cord Med 1998;21: 200-204.
  • Shields RK, and Dudley-Javoroski S. Musculoskeletal plasticity after acute spinal cord injury: effects of long-term neuromuscular electrical stimulation training. J Neurophysiol 2006;95: 2380-2390.
  • Shimada Y, Hatakeyama K, Minato T, Matsunaga T, Sato M, Chida S, and Itoi E. Hybrid functional electrical stimulation with medial linkage knee-ankle-foot orthoses in complete paraplegics. Tohoku J Exp Med 2006;209: 117-123.
  • Sigmedics I. The Parastep® I System http://www.sigmedics.com/TheParastep/theparastep.html.
  • Simmons C. Effects of aquatic treadmill training on over-ground walking for community ambulators with incomplete spinal cord injury. Journal of Aquatic Physical Therapy 2008;16: 18.
  • Solomonow M, Aguilar E, Reisin E, Baratta RV, Best R, Coetzee T, and D'Ambrosia R. Reciprocating gait orthosis powered with electrical muscle stimulation (RGO II). Part I: Performance evaluation of 70 paraplegic patients. Orthopedics 1997;20: 315-324.
  • Somers MF. Spinal cord injury: functional rehabilitation. Norwalk, CT: Appleton & Lange, 1992.
  • Stein RB, Belanger M, Wheeler G, Wieler M, Popovic DB, Prochazka A, and Davis LA. Electrical systems for improving locomotion after incomplete spinal cord injury: an assessment. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993;74: 954-959.
  • Stewart BG, Tarnopolsky MA, Hicks AL, McCartney N, Mahoney DJ, Staron RS, and Phillips SM. Treadmill training-induced adaptations in muscle phenotype in persons with incomplete spinal cord injury. Muscle Nerve 2004;30: 61-68.
  • Stewart JE, Barbeau H, and Gauthier S. Modulation of locomotor patterns and spasticity with clonidine in spinal cord injured patients. Can J Neurol Sci 1991;18: 321-332.
  • Suzuki T, Sonoda S, Saitoh E, Onogi K, Fujino H, Teranishi T, Oyobe T, Katoh M, and Ohtsuka K. Prediction of gait outcome with the knee-ankle-foot orthosis with medial hip joint in patients with spinal cord injuries: a study using recursive partitioning analysis. Spinal Cord 2007;45: 57-63.
  • Sykes L, Campbell IG, Powell ES, Ross ER, and Edwards J. Energy expenditure of walking for adult patients with spinal cord lesions using the reciprocating gait orthosis and functional electrical stimulation. Spinal Cord 1996a;34: 659-665.
  • Sykes L, Ross ER, Powell ES, and Edwards J. Objective measurement of use of the reciprocating gait orthosis (RGO) and the electrically augmented RGO in adult patients with spinal cord lesions. Prosthet Orthot Int 1996b;20: 182-190.
  • Thoumie P, Le Claire G, Beillot J, Dassonville J, Chevalier T, Perrouin-Verbe B, Bedoiseau M, Busnel M, Cormerais A, Courtillon A, and et al. Restoration of functional gait in paraplegic patients with the RGO-II hybrid orthosis. A multicenter controlled study. II: Physiological evaluation. Paraplegia 1995;33: 654-659.
  • Thrasher TA, Flett HM, and Popovic MR. Gait training regimen for incomplete spinal cord injury using functional electrical stimulation. Spinal Cord 2006;44: 357-361.
  • van der Bruggen MA, Huisman HB, Beckerman H, Bertelsmann FW, Polman CH, and Lankhorst GJ. Randomized trial of 4-aminopyridine in patients with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury. J Neurol 2001;248: 665-671.
  • Wainberg M, Barbeau H, Gauthier S. The effects of cyproheptadine on locomotion and on spasticity in patients with spinal cord injuries. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 1990;53:754-763.
  • Walker JB, and Harris M. GM-1 ganglioside administration combined with physical therapy restores ambulation in humans with chronic spinal cord injury. Neurosci Lett 1993;161: 174-178.
  • Waters RL, Yakura JS, Adkins RH, and Sie I. Recovery following complete paraplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1992;73: 784-789.
  • Weber DJ, Stein RB, Chan KM, Loeb GE, Richmond FJ, Rolf R, James K, Chong SL, Thompson AK, and Misiaszek J. Functional electrical stimulation using microstimulators to correct foot drop: a case study. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 2004;82: 784-792.
  • Wernig A. Treadmill training after spinal cord injury: good but not better. Neurology 2006a;67: 1901; author reply 1901-1902.
  • Wernig A. Weight-supported treadmill vs over-ground training for walking after acute incomplete SCI. Neurology 2006b;67: 1900; author reply 1900.
  • Wernig A, Muller S, Nanassy A, and Cagol E. Laufband therapy based on 'rules of spinal locomotion' is effective in spinal cord injured persons. Eur J Neurosci 1995;7: 823-829.
  • Wernig A, Nanassy A, and Muller S. Maintenance of locomotor abilities following Laufband (treadmill) therapy in para- and tetraplegic persons: follow-up studies. Spinal Cord 1998;36: 744-749.
  • Whittle MW, Cochrane GM, Chase AP, Copping AV, Jefferson RJ, Staples DJ, Fenn PT, and Thomas DC. A comparative trial of two walking systems for paralysed people. Paraplegia 1991;29: 97-102.
  • Wieler M, Stein RB, Ladouceur M, Whittaker M, Smith AW, Naaman S, Barbeau H, Bugaresti J, and Aimone E. Multicenter evaluation of electrical stimulation systems for walking. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80: 495-500.
  • Winchester P, Smith P, Foreman N, Mosby J, Pacheco F, Querry R, and Tansey K. A prediction model for determining over ground walking speed after locomotor training in persons with motor incomplete spinal cord injury. J of Spinal Cord Med 2009; 32:63-71.
  • Winchester PK, Carollo JJ, Parekh RN, Lutz LM, and Aston JW, Jr. A comparison of paraplegic gait performance using two types of reciprocating gait orthoses. Prosthet Orthot Int 1993;17: 101-106.
  • Wirz M, Colombo G, and Dietz V. Long term effects of locomotor training in spinal humans. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2001;71: 93-96.
  • Wirz M, Zemon DH, Rupp R, Scheel A, Colombo G, Dietz V, and Hornby TG. Effectiveness of automated locomotor training in patients with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury: A multicenter trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86: 672-680.
  • Wolpaw JR. Treadmill training after spinal cord injury: Good but not better. Neurology 2006; 66: 466-467.
  • Yang L, Granat MH, Paul JP, Condie DN, and Rowley DI. Further development of hybrid functional electrical stimulation orthoses. Spinal Cord 1996;34: 611-614.

Nutrition

Introduction

Given that traumatic spinal cord injuries tend to occur among young previously well-nourished persons, declines in nutritional status most likely occur post injury.  These declines are likely due to the combined effects of altered metabolism and lifestyle choices.  Many secondary complications of SCI are related to changes in energy, glucose, lipid and vitamin metabolism, including undesirable weight gain, cardiovascular disease risk, insulin resistance and osteoporosis.  Additional nutrition-related complications which can negatively impact quality of life include pressure ulcers and neurogenic bowel and bladder. 

At this point, little is known about the most effective health promotion activities, including nutrition interventions, required to promote long-term wellness forpersons after SCI.  However, it is clear thatadequate nutrition following SCI will help reduce the likelihood of further morbidity associated with post-SCI physiological and metabolic changes.  This chapter will summarize what is currently known regarding nutrition issues in the post-acute SCI population.

Fraser C, Teasell RW, Foulon BL, Mehta S (2010). Nutrition Issues Following Spinal Cord Injury. In Eng JJ, Teasell RW, Miller WC, Wolfe DL, Townson AF, Hsieh JTC, Connolly SJ, Mehta S, Sakakibara BM, editors. Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Evidence. Version 3.0. Vancouver: p 1-19.
We would like to acknowledge previous contributors: Candice A Rideout

Nutrition-Related Complications


Altered Glucose and Lipid Metabolism

In persons with SCI, the usual clinical measures of total body fat, such as weight and body mass index, underestimate the degree of adiposity (Spungen et al 2003; Spungen et al 2000; Bauman et al 1997; Spungen et al 1993; Mollinger et al 1985). The metabolic alterations related to adverse body composition changes, decreased physical activity and other factors in individuals with SCI are considered atherogenic (NCEP 2002; NCEP 2001; Maki et al 1995).  Even mild decline in glucose tolerance is associated with insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia, which are also considered atherogenic (Haffner et al 1990). 

Many factorscontribute to increased risk ofinsulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia, glucose intolerance, cardiovascular disease and obesity in persons with SCI.  These factors tend to correlate with the severity and level of the neurological deficit (Javierre et al. 2005).  It is hypothesized that the decreased lean muscle mass and increased adipose tissue which follow a SCI lead to impaired glucose uptake and affect whole body glucose homeostasis (Javierre et al. 2005).  Pathogenesis of SCI and lifestyle factors impact blood glucose management and increase the risk of morbidity and mortality due to cardiovascular diseases, the principal cause of death among persons with SCI (Arrowwood et al. 1987; Yekutiel et al. 1989; Javierre et al. 2005).  Abnormalities in lipid metabolism in SCI develop early following injury and tend to progress over time (Brenes et al. 1986; Bauman et al. 1992; Kocina 1997; Szlachcic et al. 2001).  Insulin resistance and exaggerated hyperinsulinemia in response to an oral glucose challenge are associated with the development of Type II diabetes mellitus, atherosclerosis and ischemic heart disease in the SCI population (Duckworth et al. 1983; Defronzo et al. 1991; Bauman et al. 1992; Mohr et al. 2001).  Conventional risk factors for coronary heart disease (CHD) should be identified and aggressively treated in individuals with SCI according to current standards of care (Bauman and Spungen 2008). 

Table 1 Altered Glucose and Lipid Metabolism

Discussion

Two studies examined altered glucose metabolism in individuals post SCI (Bauman et al. 1999; Bennegard & Karlsson 2008). Significantly higher serum glucose concentration and DM was seen in persons with complete tetraplegia (Bauman et al. 1999). Gender had no effect on level of serum glucose; however men had greater insulin levels than women (p<0.05; Bauman et al. 1999). In a second study, fasting glucose levels were compared between able bodied individuals and persons with SCI (Bennegard & Karlsson 2008). The study found a significantly higher glucose uptake in SCI individuals compared to the control.  SCI individuals had higher plasma flow rate in their legs compared to the controls; however, lean tissue mass was lower than able bodied individuals (Bennegard & Karlsson 2008).

In a prospective controlled trial, Ketover et al. (1996), evaluated gallbladder emptying in able bodied individuals compared to persons with SCI after administering liquid meal which contained 20g of a fat. Both groups demonstrated similar gallbladder emptying and volumes post interventions; however, diabetic and obese subjects with SCI showed poor gallbladder emptying (Ketover et al. 1996).

Conclusion

  • There is level 2 evidence that glucose uptake is higher in SCI individuals compared to able bodied individuals.
  • There is level 4 evidence that SCI individuals with complete tetraplegia have higher rates of altered glucose metabolism than other SCI individuals.
  • There is level 2 evidence that diabetic and obese SCI individuals show impaired gallbladder emptying in response to a high fat meal compared to healthy SCI individuals.
  • Individuals with complete tetraplegia have higher rates of altered glucose metabolism.
  • Impaired gallbladder emptying is seen in diabetic and obese SCI individuals.

Neurogenic Bowel

Alterations in the central or peripheral nervous system can result in delayed gastric emptying, prolongation of intestinal transit time, and poor colonic motility, collectively known as neurogenic bowel. Neurogenic bowel has a significant impact on the quality of life of spinal cord injured patients, causing morbidity and even death (Correa & Rotter 2000).  Modifications to dietary fibre consumption may assist with the management of neurogenic bowel following SCI. For further discussion on neurogenic bowel and specific nutrition interventions, see Neurogenic Bowel Chapter.

Neurogenic Bladder and Risk for Urinary Tract Infections

Functional foods are products that are demonstrated to have health benefits and/or reduce the risk of chronic disease beyond their basic nutritional functions(Health Canada 1998).Cranberry juice as it pertains to urinary tract infection risk may fall under the category of a functional food.  Refer to Neurogenic Bladder Chapter for further information on the potential impact of cranberry juice on urinary tract infection in the SCI population.

Pressure Ulcers

Pressure ulcers are common following SCI, and healing can be compromised by suboptimal nutrition status.  SCI patients with pressure ulcers have lower zinc, albumin and prealbumin levels than those without pressure ulcers (Cruse et al. 2000a).  Impaired nutritional status contributes to delayed or incomplete wound healing (Cruse et al. 2000b).  Refer to Pressure Ulcers Chapter for additional information regarding pressure ulcers in the SCI population.

Osteoporosis

Osteoporosis is common in SCI and results in increased bone fragility and fracture risk (Warden et al. 2001).  In addition to pharmacological and other management strategies, supplementation with nutrients such as calcium and vitamin D may play a role in bone health following SCI.  Refer to Bone Health Chapter for further details.

Nutritional Intervention Programs for Obesity & Wellness


Energy Imbalance

Obesity is a common secondary complication of chronic SCI and is associated with adverse metabolic sequelae.  In order to maintain a healthy weight, one must stay in energy balance, with energy intake equaling energy expenditure.  Total daily energy expenditure is determined by three factors: resting metabolic rate, physical activity and the thermic effect of food.  Each of these factors is altered following a SCI, rendering it challenging for SCI patients to achieve and maintain energy balance.  The resting metabolic rate of people with chronic SCI is estimated to be 14–27% lower than their able-bodied counterparts, largely due to reductions in fat-free mass and reduced sympathetic nervous system activity (Buchholz & Pencharz 2004).  Physical activity levels of persons with SCI are generally lower than that of able-bodied persons (Buchholz & Pencharz 2004).  In addition, a lower thermic effect of food has been reported in persons with a SCI compared to able-bodied controls (Monroe et al. 1998).  Without appropriate modification of dietary intake following SCI, energy intake readily exceeds daily energy expenditure, thus predisposing persons with SCI to undesirable weight gain (Cox et al. 1985). 

Given alterations in resting energy expenditure, it can be challenging to accurately estimate daily energy requirements for individuals with post-acute SCI.  Equations validated and used in able-bodied populations to predict resting metabolic rate overestimate actual measured energy needs in the SCI population (Buchholz & Pencharz 2004).  For this reason, it has been suggested that energy needs following SCI are best assessed by indirect calorimetry using a metabolic cart (Hadley 2002).   Because not all health care centers have access to metabolic carts to measure resting metabolic rate, validated equations specific to the SCI population are needed.

It is important to note that despite widespread emphasis on obesity-related health risks in persons with SCI, limited research has been carried out to address this problem.   There is a lack of information regarding the health outcomes of weight loss in this population.  In addition, there are limited educational resources available on nutrition issues and weight control for this high-risk group (Chen et al. 2006).

Table 2 Energy Expenditure and Overweight/Obesity

Discussion

Chen et al (2006) conducted a study to assess the effect of a weight loss program on body weight, body mass index, waist and neck circumference, skinfold thickness, fat vs. lean mass, bone mineral content, blood pressure, serum lipids, hemoglobin, albumin, eating habits, nutrition knowledge, bowel function and indicators of psychosocial well-being.  A total of 16 subjects with chronic SCI who were overweight or obese completed the intervention program (15 = traumatic SCI; 1 = spina bifida).  Subjects attended 90 minute counseling sessions once per week for 12 weeks, led primarily by a registered dietitian.  The dietary approach emphasized high-fibre, nutrient-dense foods (fruits, vegetables, grains, cereals) and the moderation of meats, cheeses, sugars and fats (Weinsier et al. 1983).  The program included exercise and behaviour modification.  Reported results included an average weight loss of 3.5 kg (3.8% of initial weight), significant reductions in body mass index, anthropometric measures and fat mass.  Lean mass, hemoglobin, albumin and bone mineral content were maintained.  There was no significant change in blood pressure or LDL cholesterol.  There was a decrease in HDL cholesterol.  There was a trend between weight lost and decrease in waist circumference, increase in nutritional quality of diet, increase in fibre consumption and decrease in time required for bowel movement.  Changes in psychosocial and physical functioning were also reported.  

Conclusion

  • There is level 4 evidence from one pre-post study (Chen et al., 2006) that an intervention program combining diet and exercise is effective for reducing weight among overweight persons with SCI.
  • A combined diet and exercise program can help patients reduce weight following SCI without compromising total lean mass and overall health.

Health Promotion

Little is known about the most effective health promotion activities, including nutrition interventions, to meet the long-term wellness needs for persons after SCI.  A holistic wellness program intervention was developed, conducted and assessed by Zemper et al (2003).

Table 3 Nutritional Intervention and Long-Term Wellness Needs for Individuals after SCI

Discussion

In the Zemper et al (2003) study, 43 adults with SCI were randomly assigned to intervention or control groups. The intervention group attended 6 half-day wellness workshops over a 3-month period which included nutrition, physical activity, lifestyle management and prevention of secondary conditions.  Among other measurements, total cholesterol and body mass index were assessed.  Health Promoting Lifestyle Profile-II (HPLP-II) was used to assess nutrition and other health promotion habits.  There was improvement in the HPLP-II nutrition subscale mean score for the intervention group.  Mean body mass index values actually increased for both groups.  Total cholesterol values rose for both groups (the study reported on total cholesterol only; changes in HDL and LDL cholesterol values were not reported).  There were significant improvements in reported eating and weight related behaviours.

A study was conducted by Liusuwan et al (2007) which investigated the effects of behavioural intervention, exercise and nutrition education to improve health and fitness in adolescents with spinal cord dysfunction as the result of myelomeningocele and SCI.  Fourteen of a total of twenty original adolescent subjects completed all testing sessions conducted prior to and after completing a 16-week intervention program.  Testing included measurements of aerobic fitness, heart rate, oxygen uptake, peak isokinetic arm and shoulder strength, body composition, body mass index and blood work assessment which included total, HDL and LDL cholesterol and triglycerides.  Participants were given a schedule of aerobic and strengthening exercises and attended nutrition education and behaviour modification sessions every other week accompanied by their parents.  Results suggested that there was no significant overall change in weight, body mass index or blood work.  There was a significant increase in whole body lean tissue without a concomitant increase in whole body fat.  Fitness measures revealed a significant increase in maximum power output, work efficiency and resting oxygen uptake.  Shoulder extension strength increased.  There were no significant changes in total, HDL or LDL cholesterol or triglycerides during the 16-week program.   

Conclusion

  • There is level 1 evidence based on one RCT (Zemper et al., 2003) that improved health related behaviours are adopted following a holistic wellness program for individuals with SCI.
  • There is level 4 evidence from one pre-post study (Liusuwan et al 2007) that an education program combining nutrition, exercise and behaviour modification is effective in increasing whole body lean tissue, maximum power output, work efficiency, resting oxygen uptake and shoulder strength in persons with SCI.  
  • Participation in a holistic wellness program is positively associated with improved eating and weight-related behaviours in persons with SCI.
  • A combined nutrition, exercise and behaviour modification program can help persons with SCI increase metabolically active lean tissue, work efficiency, resting oxygen uptake and strength.

Nutritional Interventions for Dyslipidemia

Nutrition Counseling for Individuals with Dyslipidemia and Cardiovascular Disease Risk

Cardiovascular disease appears prematurely in persons with SCI.  It is the most frequent cause of death among persons surviving more than 30 years following injury and accounts for 45% of all SCI deaths (Devivo et al. 1999). Abnormalities in lipid metabolism in individuals with SCI develop shortly after injury and tend to progress over time (Brenes et al. 1986; Bauman et al. 1992; Kocina 1997; Szlachcic et al. 2001).  Despite the high risk for CVD morbidity and mortality in individuals with SCI, few studies have addressed the benefits of risk reduction interventions aimed at modifiable factors and those that exist have been limited to exercise interventions.  This section discusses what is known about the value of nutrition counseling in improving dyslipidemia in persons with SCI.   

Table 4 The Effect of Nutrition Counseling on Dyslipidemia and Cardiovascular Disease Risk

Discussion

Szlachcic et al (2001)evaluated the effects of dietary education for individuals with SCI at least 2 years post-injury who had moderately elevated total cholesterol levels (>5.2mmol/L) and reported significant decreases in total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLC).  Individuals who were assessed at baseline as having total cholesterol (TC) values greater than 5.2 mmol/L (200 mg/dL) (N = 86; control group)were referred to the staff registered dietitian for counseling.  Specifically, individuals were advised to limit daily fat intake to <30% of total daily calories (kcal), daily saturated fat intake to <10%, dailycholesterol intake to <300 mg and to consume 60% of total daily calories as carbohydrate.  Subjects in the treatment group were seen by a dietitian at least twice to assess their dietary compliance.  The remaining 136 subjects (control group) did not receive nutrition consultation.  Subjects in the treatment group were significantly older and had a greater number of years post-injury than those in the control group; therefore, changes in lipid profile were analyzed controlling for differences in age and duration post-injury.  A summary of results is as follows – Total cholesterol – Treatment group demonstrated a significant decrease in TC; control group showed a significant increase in TC; 69% of those in the treatment group had decreases in TC compared to 43% in the control group.  LDLC – The treatment group demonstrated significant declines in LDLC while LDLC in the control group showed a non-significant increase between baseline and follow-up.  In the treatment group, 67% had decreases in LDLC compared with 47% of those in the control group.  High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLC) – Although there were no significant changes in either group, one third of all subjects in both groups had HDLC values below the recommended range at baseline.  Triglycerides (TG) – Although there was a significant group-by-examination interaction for the mean triglyceride values, univariate analyses did not detect a significant difference between the initial and follow-up values for either groups; 60% of the treatment group compared with 45% of control group had declines in TG values.      

Conclusion

  • There is level 2 evidence from one prospective controlled trial (Szlachic et al., 2001) that standard dietary counseling (total fat <30% of kcal, saturated fat <10% of kcal, cholesterol <300 mg, carbohydrate 60% of kcal) can reduce total and LDL cholesterol among individuals with SCI who have total cholesterol >5.2 mmol/L.
  • Dietary counseling results in improved lipid profile; consultation with a registered dietitian should be obtained, because individualized diets may enhance compliance.

Omega-3 Fatty Acid Supplementation

Recent studies suggest that n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (found primarily in fatty fish, and in smaller amounts in flax, soy, canola, olive and wheat germ oils and black walnuts) have beneficial effects on cardiovascular disorders including anti-inflammatory, antithrombotic, hypolipemic and vasodilatory effects and contribute to primary and secondary prevention of ischemic heart disease in the general population (Hirafuji et al. 2003; Simopoulos 1999).     

Table 5 Nutrient Supplementation and Lipid Profile Post SCI

Discussion

Javierre et al. (2005)assessed the effects on lipid profile and fasting blood glucose in 19 adult males with SCI at 3 and 6 months following daily supplementation of 1.5 grams docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and 0.75 grams of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA).  Despite significant increases in the plasma concentration of DHA and EPA, plasma concentrations of glucose, total, HDL and LDL cholesterols, very low density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglycerides did not show differences as the result of n-3 fatty acid supplementation. 

Conclusion

  • There is level 4 evidence from one pre-post study (Javierre et al., 2005) that daily supplementation with DHA (1.5 g) and EPA (0.75 g) increases plasma DHA and EPA levels but does not alter total cholesterol, HDL, LDL, VLDL, triglycerides, or glucose.
  • Blood concentrations of DHA and EPA increased as the result of n-3 fatty acid supplementation; however, no significant changes in lipid profile were identified. 

Nutrient Supplementation and Physical Performance Post-SCI

Studies have suggested that EPA and DHA supplementation may result in changes in red blood cells (Andersson et al 2002; Bruckner et al 1987; Cartwright et al 1985; Terano et al 1983) which in turn may improve oxygen delivery to working muscles.  Another study has shown that fish oil supplementation may facilitate fat oxidation (Delarue et al 2003).  Supplementation with EPA and DHA may improve VO2max and aerobic performance. 

Table 6 Nutrient Supplementation and Physical Performance Post-SCI

Discussion

Javierre et al. (2006) conducted a study to determine whether omega-3 fatty acid supplementation may contribute to improved muscle strength and endurance capacity in persons with SCI.  Twenty-one males, 18 with paraplegia and 3 with tetraplegia, underwent global physical evaluations at the beginning of, at 3 months and 6 months of omega-3 fatty acid supplementation.  Participants continued with their usual diet while taking 1.5 grams per day of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and 0.60 grams per day of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) plus 9 mg of alpha tocopherol provided in capsules; 2 capsules at each of 3 meals were consumed.  No adverse effects were observed during the supplementation period.  Increases in the concentrations of plasma DHA and EPA were observed.  Body weight of the participants was stable during the study.  There was an observed improvement in the functional capacity of the neuromuscular system as shown in enhanced strength and endurance of the upper-body musculature in the tests performed by the subjects. 

Conclusion

  • There is level 4 evidence from one pre-post study (Javierre et al., 2006) that omega-3 fatty acid supplementation increases upper body strength and endurance in persons with SCI.
  • Omega-3 fatty acid supplementation increases upper body strength and endurance in persons with SCI.

Vitamin Deficiencies and Supplementation

Although little work has been done examining the vitamin profiles of individuals following SCI it is generally thought that vitamin deficiency is a significant issue. Moussavi et al. (2003) reported that 16 to 37% of community-dwelling SCI subjects had serum levels below the reference range for vitamins A, C and E compared with general population norms.   

A case controlled study by Lynch et al. (2002) assessed complete blood count, white blood cells, iron status, ferritin, red blood cell folate, vitamin B12, magnesium, zinc, albumin and prealbumin in persons with chronic SCI and compared values to those of age and gender-matched non-SCI controls.  Results were not outside the normal ranges for either group; however, the SCI group had significantly different median values than the control group for hemoglobin, white blood cell count, albumin, prealbumin, serum iron and % saturation.

Vitamin D Supplementation

Vitamin D deficiency is widespread and may result in a vast array of health consequences including osteoporosis, falls, increased cancer risk and altered glucose and lipid metabolism – the pathogenesis of diabetes and cardiovascular disease.  It plays an essential role in muscle and bone health, immunity and muscle signaling and has been linked with autoimmune disorders such as multiple sclerosis (Cherniak et al 2008; Ford et al 2005; Mathieu et al 2005; Cantorna et al 2006). Obesity has been associated with decreased bioavailability of vitamin D, and percentage body fat is inversely related to vitamin D levels and directly correlated with parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels (Snijder et al 2005; Wortsman et al 2000). 

The skeletal effects of hypovitaminosis D are evidenced in progressive stages – calcium malabsorption with secondary elevation of PTH, increased bone remodeling and osteoporosis and further histologic changes related to continued lack of calcium and poor mineralization (Heaney 1999).

Individuals with SCI have an increased occurrence of vitamin D deficiency, resulting from a number of factors including decreased exposure to sunlight, inadequate dietary intake and the effect of medications.  In turn, vitamin D deficiency promotes calcium deficiency and secondary hyperparathyroidism, resulting in further bone loss and exacerbating osteoporosis.  Myopathy and nonspecific musculoskeletal pain may also develop as a consequence of vitamin D deficiency (Bauman et al. 2005; Holick 2005).    

Observational studies have shown that vitamin D deficiency is common among individuals with SCI.  Bauman et al. (1995) reported that 32 of 100 SCI subjects had 25(OH)D levels below normal range; 11 of the 32 had elevated serum PTH levels.  Zhou et al. (1992) measured the 25(OH)D, serum calcium, magnesium and albumin concentrations of 92 men with SCI, 38 of whom had single or multiple pressure ulcers, and compared these values with those of able-bodied controls.  The SCI group had lower serum 25(OH)D,  total calcium and albumin concentrations.  Quadriplegics had lower 25(OH)D levels than paraplegics.  Additionally, the SCI subgroup with pressure ulcers demonstrated significantly lower serum 25(OH)D, calcium and magnesium levels than the SCI subjects without ulcers. 

There is increasing support for vitamin D supplementation beyond present recommendations.  Additional studies are needed to establish the best diagnostic and supplementation guidelines for different populations (Cherniak et al 2008).

Table 7 Vitamin D Supplementation Post SCI

Discussion

Bauman et al. (2005)determined that healthy individuals with chronic SCI living in the community have vitamin D deficiency.  Ten subjects with chronic SCI and a diagnosis of absolute vitamin D (25(OH)D) deficiency received 50 ug (2000 IU) of vitamin D3 twice per week for 2 weeks in addition to 1.5 grams (1500 mg) of elemental calcium daily.  Serum 25(OH)D levels significantly increased by day 14; however, levels remained below normal range in 8/10 subjects.  Serum calcium level was not significantly different but urinary calcium significantly increased.  Serum PTH levels significantly decreased.  Forty subjects with chronic SCI, regardless of initial serum vitamin D status, received 10 ug (400 IU) of vitamin D3 daily in addition to a multivitamin that contained 10 ug (400 IU) vitamin D3 for a total of 20 ug (800 IU) daily for 12 months.  Subjects were encouraged to have at least 0.8 grams (800 mg) of calcium in their daily diet and were supplemented daily with 0.5 grams (500 mg) elemental calcium.  Vitamin D levels significantly increased from baseline at 6 and 12 months.  There was no significant association of level of injury with baseline 25(OH)D levels.  Serum and ionized calcium were not significantly different after 12 months of treatment.  Serum PTH was significantly reduced at 6 and 12 months.  It is important to note that at baseline, 33 of the 40 subjects had 25(OH)D levels that were below the lower limit of normal, and that after 12 months of supplementation at 800 IU, only 8 of the 40 subjects had serum 25(OH)D values greater than 30 ng/mL which is not adequate to reverse elevated parathyroid levels and reduce bone turnover, despite significant decreases in PTH at 12 months.  Finally, 40 subjects were simultaneously enrolled in a placebo-controlled study on the effect of a vitamin D analog (4 ug/day of 1-alpha hydroxyvitamin D2) on lower extremity bone mineral density.  Following randomization, 19 of the 40 subjects received the analog or placebo.  The vitamin D analog was not considered to appreciably affect the serum 25(OH)D response to vitamin D supplementation. Subjects were encouraged to have at least 0.8 grams (800 mg) of calcium in their daily diets and were supplemented daily with 0.5 g (500 mg) elemental calcium.  There was no significant difference at 6 and 12 months in serum PTH level between individuals who were receiving 1-alpha hydroxyvitamin D2 or placebo.

Vitamin D3 supplementation resulted in significant increases in 25(OH)D levels and reductions in parathyroid hormone; however, suboptimal 25(OH)D levels persisted, suggesting the need for higher doses of vitamin D3 supplementation and/or longer periods of administration.

Conclusion

  • There is level 4 evidence from 2 pre-post studies (Bauman et al., 2005) that vitamin D3 supplementation raises serum 25(OH) D levels in persons with chronic SCI.  However, the dose and duration required to ensure vitamin D3 sufficiency remains unclear.
  • Individuals with SCI should be screened for vitamin D deficiency and, if needed, replacement therapy should be initiated.

Vitamin B12

The prevalence of vitamin B12 deficiency in persons with SCI is reported to be between 5.7 and 19% (Petchkrua et al. 2002).  Symptoms may include declining gait, depression or fatigue, upper limb weakness, memory loss and worsening pain (Petchkrua et al. 2002; Petchkrua et al. 2003).  Vitamin B12 deficiency usually responds to supplementation. 

Petchkrua et al. (2003) conducted a cross-sectional study with prospective blood collection and retrospective medical record review to assess the prevalence of vitamin B12 deficiency in persons with SCI.  Biochemical vitamin B12 deficiency was reported in 13% of the subjects.  While hematologic abnormalities were infrequent, neuropsychiatric symptoms were observed in half of the subjects.  The age range most associated with vitamin B12 deficiency was 40 – 59 years; among subjects older than 59 years, 9% had B12 deficiency.  No deficiency was noted in subjects within the age range of 20 – 39 years.  Deficiency was more predominant in subjects with complete SCI.  

Petchkrua et al. (2002) followed a retrospective chart review of patients with SCI who had received serum vitamin B12 testing over a 10 year period.  The most common symptoms among subjects identified as having deficient, subnormal or low normal vitamin B12 levels were declining gait, depression, fatigue, upper limb weakness, memory loss or worsening pain.  In this report, greater than half of the cases of probable vitamin B12 deficiency occurred in young persons with no known risk factors. Neurologic and/or psychiatric symptoms improved in 88% of SCI subjects following high-dose oral or monthly parenteral vitamin B12 supplementation.  It is recommended that clinicians conduct early screening and treatment of vitamin B12 deficiency.  However, definitive trials have not been done.

Given the potential for permanent neurological deficits, the relatively low cost of screening and the low cost and high efficacy of high-dose oral supplementation, Petchkrua et al. (2002) suggest that clinicians conduct early screening and treatment of vitamin B12 deficiency. Additional investigations into the predisposing risk factors for vitamin B12 deficiency in persons with SCI are warranted.

  • Clinicians should conduct early screening for and treatment of vitamin B12 deficiency.

Creatine Supplementation for Muscle Function and Exercise Capacity

Synthesized by the liver, kidney and pancreas, creatine occurs naturally and is found primarily in skeletal muscle. It can be obtained from eating foods rich in creatine such as meat and fish or be consumed in the form of supplement powders.The most predominant form of creatine is phosphocreatine which contributes to the rapid resynthesis of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) during short-term, high-intensity exercise.  Dietary supplementation of creatine has been shown to improve strength, power and recovery from high-intensity exercise in the able-bodied population (Casey et al 1996; Balsom et al 1995; Earnest et al 1995; Greenoff et al 1993; Harris et al 1993). Creatine serves as a short duration reservoir for the energy required for muscle contraction in skeletal muscle. Low levels of intramuscular creatine are seen in some neuromuscular diseases. Creatine supplementation improves muscle strength in some patient populations with neurological disorders (Kendall et al 2005).

Table 8 Creatine Administration Post SCI

Discussion

Kendall et al (2005) reported findings of a study that sought to determine whether creatine supplementation improves muscle strength, endurance and function in weak upper limb muscles in person with tetraplegia.  Eight individuals with tetraplegia and mild wrist extensor weakness were randomized to receive creatine or a placebo in a double-blind crossover design.  During creatine supplementation, participants received oral doses of creatine monohydrate powder (10 grams orally twice per day for 6 days then were maintained on 5 grams daily until they underwent testing).  There was no change in any of the functional tests performed by the participants and none of the participants had a change in self-reported motor Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores.

Persons with SCI have decreased upper extremity work capacity.  Individuals with cervical-level SCI have limited proficiency in the repeated tasks of daily living that require endurance and strength (Lin et al., 1993; Hopman et al., 1992; Jehl et al., 1991; Van Loan et al., 1987).   A study by Jacobs et al (2002) sought to determine the effects of oral creatine monohydrate supplementation on upper-extremity work capacity in persons with complete cervical-level SCI.  Sixteen men with complete tetraplegia (C5 – 7) were randomly assigned to one of two groups and received either 20 grams per day of creatine monohydrate supplement powder or placebo for the first treatment phase; treatment was reversed in the second phase.  Each treatment phase lasted for 7 days with a 21-day washout period.  Peak power output, time to fatigue, heart rate and metabolic measures including oxygen uptake, minute ventilation, tidal volume and respiratory frequency were assessed.  Significantly greater values of oxygen uptake, tidal volume and carbon dioxide production were observed in the groups receiving the creatine monohydrate supplementation.  The investigators concluded that creatine supplementation enhances exercise capacity in persons with complete tetraplegia and may promote greater exercise training benefits. 

Conclusion

  • There is level 1 evidence based on one RCT (Kendall et al., 2005) that creatine supplementation did not result in improvements in wrist extensor strength or muscle function.
  • There is level 1 evidence based on one RCT cross-over trial (Jacobs et al., 2002) that creatine supplementation enhances exercise capacity in persons with complete tetraplegia and may promote greater exercise training benefits.
  • Creatine supplementation does not result in improvements in muscle strength, endurance or function in weak upper limb muscles.
  • Creatine supplementation enhances exercise capacity in persons with complete tetraplegia and may promote greater exercise training benefits.

Cardiovascular and Hormonal Responses to Food Ingestion

Persons with chronic primary autonomic failure and widespread sympathetic denervation and postural hypotension often have postprandial hypotension (Mathias, 1991).  Food consumption often exacerbates symptoms and the degree of postural hypotension in certain groups.  The cardiovascular responses to food ingestion in individuals with tetraplegia have not been investigated.

Table 9 Cardiovascular and Hormonal Responses to Food Ingestion

Discussion

A fall in blood pressure following the ingestion of food has been described in individuals with secondary autonomic failure of various causes; however, the cardiovascular and hormonal responses to food ingestion in individuals with tetraplegia with cervical spinal cord transection have not been studied.  Baliga et al. (1997) investigated the effects of a standard liquid meal (300 mL total liquid volume, 550 kilocalories, 66 grams carbohydrate, 22 grams fat, 18 grams protein) on blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR) and neurohormonal levels in tetraplegics with physiologically complete cervical cord transection.  Five paraplegics with complete lesions (T12-L3) and essentially intact sympathetic nervous systems who did not experience postural hypotension served as the control group.  The experimental group consisted of 6 tetraplegics (C4 – 7) with chronic and complete cervical spinal cord transection.  All had postural hypotension.  After food ingestion there was no fall in BP in tetraplegics or controls.  HR did not change in either group.  Following food ingestion plasma noradrenaline was unchanged in tetraplegics but rose in controls.  Plasma renin activity (PRA) rose in tetraplegics but not in controls.  The fall in BP and rise in HR on head-up tilt after the meal in tetraplegics was similar to that before the meal.  There was no change in PRA following the pre-prandial tilt in either group; post-prandial tilt raised levels in the tetraplegics but not in the controls.  The authors summarized that there is a difference in the responses to food ingestion between tetraplegics and paraplegic controls and even more pronounced differences from other autonomic disorders with sympathetic dysfunction which may relate to the site and nature of the sympathetic lesion and compensatory mechanisms.   

Conclusion

  • There is level 3 evidence from one case control study (Baliga et al., 1997) that consumption of a standard liquid meal does not change blood pressure, heart rate or noradrenalin levels in tetraplegics with postural hypotension. 
  • Consumption of a standard liquid meal does not change blood pressure, heart rate or noradrenalin levels in tetraplegics with postural hypotension.

The Effects of Nutrient Intake on Ambulation Performance

Reconditioning exercises pursued by persons with incomplete SCI have shown to reverse the decline in function imposed by the paralysis (Jacobs et al 2001).  Nutrition-related modifications that optimize physical performance for individuals with SCI have not been studied extensively compared to that of individuals without disability.

Table 10 Nutrient Intake on Ambulation Performance

Discussion

Dietary, pharmacologic and nutrient modifications that may optimize physical performance for individuals with SCI have not been extensively studied.  In the able-bodied population an effective nutrient supplementation combination to hasten recovery from intense activity and to improve performance in subsequent bouts of exercise is whey protein and carbohydrate (Ivy, 2001; Ivy 1998).  Nash et al (2007) investigated the effect of protein and carbohydrate intake on ambulation in three persons with incomplete SCI (C5 – T4).  The subjects walked to fatigue on 5 consecutive days; upon fatigue, participants consumed 48 grams of whey plus 1 gram per kilogram of body weight of carbohydrate.  The process was repeated following a weekend of rest.  Following a 2-week wash-out period the process was repeated using 48 grams of soy supplement.  Oxygen consumption, carbon dioxide production, respiratory exchange ratio, distance and time of walk and calculated calorie expenditure were measured.  The authors concluded that the combination of whey protein plus carbohydrate supplement ingestion following fatiguing ambulation improved subsequent ambulation by increasing distance, time to fatigue and caloric expenditure compared to soy supplement consumption.  

Conclusion

  • There is level 2 evidence based on one RCT cross-over trial (Nash et al., 2007) that the consumption of a whey protein plus carbohydrate supplement following fatiguing ambulation improves subsequent ambulation by increasing distance, time to fatigue and caloric expenditure in persons with incomplete SCI. 
  • The consumption of a whey protein plus carbohydrate supplement following fatiguing ambulation improves subsequent ambulation by increasing distance, time to fatigue and caloric expenditure in persons with incomplete SCI.

Post-Meal Resting Energy Expenditure

Food ingestion increases the metabolic rate to levels above basal (Jequier 1986; Lusk 1930).  This rise in metabolic rate in the able-bodied population is initiated within minutes following meal ingestion, reaches its maximum after approximately one hour and lasts up to 6 hours after food consumption.  The mechanisms whereby nutrients stimulate energy expenditure are not fully understood.  The potential role of the central sympathoadrenal system in the stimulation of nutrient-induced thermogenesis requires investigation.   

Table 11 Post-Meal Resting Energy Expenditure Post SCI

Discussion

The increase in the metabolic rate above basal levels following food ingestion is known as nutrient-induced thermogenesis (Jequier 1986; Lusk 1930).This post-meal rise in metabolic rate is significant to daily heat production and body weight homeostasis and may have a potential role in counteracting the development of obesity.  In many obese individuals and in other conditions of insulin resistance nutrient-induced thermogenesis is reduced below normal levels (Brundin et al 1992; Segal et al 1990; Segal et al 1985; Shetty et al 1981; Pittet et al 1976). The rise in resting energy expenditure following food consumption has been generally considered to be mediated by central activation of the sympathoadrenal system; the purpose of a study by Aksnes et al (1993) was to determine the possible role of central sympathoadrenal stimulation for thermogenesis after ingestion of a normal mixed meal, in liquid form, in seven male subjects with chronic complete lesions of the cervical spinal cord (C4 – C7) (group A).  The thermogenic responses were compared to those in healthy males as well as to the responses in a control group of tetraplegic patients who received equal volumes of water instead of the liquid meal (group B).  The authors concluded that nutrient-induced thermogenesis in tetraplegic individuals with low sympathoadrenal activity is not diminished compared to healthy controls; efferent sympathoadrenal stimulation from the brain is not necessary for nutrient-induced thermogenesis in man. 

Conclusion

  • There is level 3 evidence based on one case control study (Asknes et al., 1993) that meal-induced thermogenesis is not decreased in tetraplegic individuals with low sympathoadrenal activity and that efferent sympathoadrenal stimulation from the brain is not necessary for nutrient-induced thermogenesis.
  • Meal-induced thermogenesis is not decreased in tetraplegic individuals with low sympathoadrenal activity and efferent sympathoadrenal stimulation from the brain is not necessary for nutrient-induced thermogenesis.

Cardiovascular, Endocrine and Renal Responses to Dietary Sodium Restriction in Persons with Paraplegia and Tetraplegia

The kidneys are richly innervated by the sympathetic nervous system (Gazdar and Dammin, 1970, Muller and Barajas, 1972 in Sutters 1992).  The role of the sympathetic renal nerves in the adaptation to changes in dietary sodium intake in persons with spinal cord injury and impaired sympathetic nervous systems warrant study. 

Table 12 Responses to Dietary Sodium Restriction in Persons Post SCI

Discussion

In a study by Sutters et al (1992) the effects of change from a high to low sodium diet on renal sodium and water excretion and hormonal responses were studied in nine individuals with tetraplegia and dissociated sympathetic control (DS) and in six controls with paraplegia with intact sympathetic systems (IS).  Total and fractional urinary sodium excretion, supine mean arterial pressure, creatinine clearance, plasma renin activity and plasma atrial natriuretic peptide concentration were measured.  The authors reported that the results suggested that direct sympathetic control of the kidney is not required for renal sodium conservation in response to dietary salt restriction; however, is likely involved in the hemodynamic and hormonal responses.    

Conclusion

  • There is level 3 evidence based on one case control study (Sutters et al., 1992) that sympathetic control of the kidney is not required for renal sodium conservation in response to dietary salt restriction.    
  • Impairment of sympathetic control of the kidney secondary to SCI resulting in tetraplegia does not impact renal sodium conservation in response to dietary salt restriction.

Summary

There is a paucity of intervention studies investigating nutritional status and associated risk for persons with SCI. Many descriptive and observational publications address the risk for obesity, dyslipidemia and cardiovascular disease, impaired glycemic control and diabetes mellitus. Blood lipid profiles and indicators of impaired glucose tolerance and hyperinsulinemia of persons with SCI have been compared with those of able-bodied controls. Despite the high risk for CVD morbidity and mortality in individuals with SCI as evidenced by blood values, metabolic and lifestyle factors, few studies have addressed the benefits of risk reduction interventions aimed at modifiable factors and have been limited to exercise. Other studies have investigated vitamin and mineral status of persons with SCI and compared values to those of able-bodied controls or to general population norms and have found lower levels of a variety of nutrients in the SCI population. Few publications have suggested screening and supplementation strategies to address these trends.

  • There is level 2 evidence that glucose uptake is higher in SCI individuals compared to able bodied individuals.
  • There is level 4 evidence that SCI individuals with complete tetraplegia have higher rates of altered glucose metabolism than other SCI individuals.
  • There is level 2 evidence that diabetic and obese SCI individuals show gallbladder emptying compared to healthy SCI individuals.
  • There is level 4 evidence from one pre-post trial (Chen et al., 2006) that an intervention program combining diet and exercise is effective for reducing weight among overweight persons with SCI.
  • There is level 1 evidence based on one RCT (Zemper et al., 2003) that improved health related behaviours are adopted following a holistic wellness program for individuals with SCI.
  • There is level 4 evidence from one pre-post study (Liusuwah et al., 2007) that an education program combining nutrition, exercise and behaviour modification is effective in increasing whole body lean tissue, maximum power output, work efficiency, resting oxygen uptake and shoulder strength in persons with SCI.  
  • There is level 2 evidence from one prospective controlled trial (Szlachic et al., 2001) that standard dietary counseling (daily total fat <30% of kcal, saturated fat <10% of kcal, cholesterol <300 mg, carbohydrate 60% of kcal) can reduce total and LDL cholesterol among individuals with SCI and total cholesterol >5.2mmol/L.
  • There is level 4 evidence from one pre-post study (Javierre et al., 2005) that daily supplementation with DHA (1.5 g) and EPA (0.75 g) increases plasma DHA and EPA levels but does not alter total cholesterol, HDL, LDL, VLDL, triglycerides, or glucose.
  • There is level 4 evidence from one pre-post study (Javierre et al., 2006) that omega-3 fatty acid supplementation increases upper body strength and endurance in persons with SCI.
  • There is level 4 evidence from two pre-post studies (Bauman et al., 2005) that vitamin D3 supplementation raises serum 25(OH)D levels.  However, the dose and duration required to ensure vitamin D3 sufficiency remains unclear.
  • There is level 1evidence based on one RCT (Kendall et al., 2005) that creatine supplementation did not result in improvements in wrist extensor strength or muscle function.
  • There is level 1 evidence based on one RCT cross-over trial (Jacobs et al., 2002) that creatine supplementation enhances exercise capacity in persons with complete tetraplegia and may promote greater exercise training benefits.
  • There is level 3 evidence from one case control study (Baliga et al., 1997) that consumption of a standard liquid meal does not change blood pressure, heart rate or noradrenalin levels in tetraplegics with postural hypotension. 
  • There is level 2 evidence based on one RCT cross-over trial (Nash et al., 2007) that the consumption of a whey protein plus carbohydrate supplement following fatiguing ambulation improves subsequent ambulation by increasing distance, time to fatigue and caloric expenditure in persons with incomplete SCI. 
  • There is level 3 evidence based on one case control study (Asknes et al., 1993) that meal-induced thermogenesis is not decreased in tetraplegic individuals with low sympathoadrenal activity and that efferent sympathoadrenal stimulation from the brain is not necessary for nutrient-induced thermogenesis.
  • There is level 3 evidence based on one case control study (Sutters et al., 1992) that sympathetic control of the kidney is not required for renal sodium conservation in response to dietary salt restriction.    
  • More research is needed to evaluate the role of nutrition in the management of post-acute SCI to provide the evidence base required for optimal clinical decisions.

Key Points

  • Individuals with complete tetraplegia have higher rates of altered glucose metabolism.
  • Impaired gallbladder emptying is seen in diabetic and obese SCI individuals.
  • A combined diet and exercise program can help patients reduce weight following SCI without compromising total lean mass and overall health.
  • Participation in a holistic wellness program is positively associated with improved eating and weight-related behaviours in persons with SCI.
  • A combined nutrition, exercise and behaviour modification program can help persons with SCI increase metabolically active lean tissue, work efficiency, resting oxygen uptake and strength.
  • Dietary counseling results in improved lipid profile; consultation with a registered dietitian should be obtained, because individualized diets may enhance compliance.
  • Blood concentrations of DHA and EPA increased as the result of n-3 fatty acid supplementation; however, no significant changes in lipid profile were identified. 
  • Omega-3 fatty acid supplementation increases upper body strength and endurance in persons with SCI.
  • Individuals with SCI should be screened for vitamin D deficiency and, if needed, replacement therapy should be initiated.
  • Clinicians should conduct early screening for and treatment of vitamin B12 deficiency.
  • Creatine supplementation does not result in improvements in muscle strength, endurance or function in weak upper limb muscles.
  • Creatine supplementation enhances exercise capacity in persons with complete tetraplegia and may promote greater exercise training benefits.
  • Consumption of a standard liquid meal does not change blood pressure, heart rate or noradrenalin levels in tetraplegics with postural hypotension.
  • The consumption of a whey protein plus carbohydrate supplement following fatiguing ambulation improves subsequent ambulation by increasing distance, time to fatigue and caloric expenditure in persons with incomplete SCI.
  • Meal-induced thermogenesis is not decreased in tetraplegic individuals with low sympathoadrenal activity and efferent sympathoadrenal stimulation from the brain is not necessary for nutrient-induced thermogenesis.
  • Impairment of sympathetic control of the kidney secondary to SCI resulting in tetraplegia does not impact renal sodium conservation in response to dietary salt restriction.
  • More research is needed to evaluate the role of nutrition in the management of post-acute SCI to provide the evidence base required for optimal clinical decisions.

References

  • Andersson A, Nalsen C, Tanglad S, Vessby B. Fatty acid composition of skeletal muscle reflects dietary fat composition in humans. Am J of Clin Nutrition 2002;76:1222-1229.
  • Arrowwood JA, Mohant PK, Thames MD. Cardiovascular problems in the spinal cord injury patient.  Phys. Med. Rehabil. State Art Review 1987;1:443-456.
  • Asknes AK, Brundin T, Hjetlnes N, Maehlum S, Wahren J. Meal-induced rise in resting energy expenditure in patients with complete cervical spinal cord lesions. Paraplegia1993;31:463-472.
  • Baliga RR, Catz AB, Watson LD, Short DJ, Frankel HL, Mathias CJ. Cardiovascular and hormonal responses to food ingestion in humans with spinal cord transaction. Clinical Autonomic Research 1997;7:137-141.
  • Balsom P, Soderlund K, Sjodin B, Ekblom B. Skeletal muscle metabolism during short duration high-intensity exercise: influence of creatine supplementation. Acta Physiol Scand 1995;1154:303-10.
  • Bauman WA, Adkins RH, Spungen AM, Waters RL. The effect of residual neurological deficit on oral glucose tolerance in persons with chronic spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 1999;37(11):765-771.
  • Bauman WA, Spungen AM. Coronary heart disease in individuals with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2008;46:466-476.
  • Bauman WA, Morrison NG, Spungen AM. Vitamin D replacement therapy in persons with spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med 2005;28:203-207.
  • Bauman WA, Spungen AM, Zhong YG, Mobbs CV.  Plasma leptin is directly related to body adiposity in subjects with spinal cord injury. Horm Metab Res 1997;28:732-736.
  • Bauman WA, Zhong YG, Schwartz E. Vitamin D deficiency in veterans with chronic spinal cord injury. Metabolism 1995;44:1612-1616.
  • Bauman  Wa, Spungen AM, Raza M, Tothstein J, Zhang RL, Zhong YG et al. Coronary artery disease: metabolic risk factors and latent disease in individuals with paraplegia. Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine 1992; 59:163-8.
  • Bennegard GM, Karlsson AK. Higher glucose uptake in paralysed spastic leg. Spinal Cord 2008;46(2):103-106.
  • Brenes G. Dearwater S, Shapera R. Laporte RE, Collins E.  High density lipoprotein cholesterol concentration in physically active and sedentary spinal cord injured patients.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1986; 67:445-450.
  • Bruckner G, Webb P, Greenwell L, Chow C, Richardson D. Fish oil increases peripheral capillary blood cell velocity in humans. Atherosclerosis 1987;66:237-245.
  • Brundin T, Thorne A, Wahren J. Heat leakage across the abdominal wall and meal-induced thermogenisis in normal-weight and obese subjects. 1992;41:49-55.
  • Buchholz AC, Pencharz PB. Energy expenditure in chronic spinal cord injury. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2004;7:635-639.
  • Cantorna MT. Vitamin D and its role in immunology: multiple sclerosis, and inflammatory bowel disease.  Prog Biophys Mol Biol 2006;92:60-64.
  • Cartwright IJ, Pockley AG, Galloway JH Greaves M, Preston FE. The effects of dietary omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids on erythrocyte membrane phospholipids, erythrocyte deformability and blood viscosity in healthy volunteers. Atherosclerosis. 1985;55:267-281.
  • Casey A, Constantin-Teodosiu D, Howell D, Hultman E, Greenhaff P. Creatine ingestion favorably affects performance and muscle metabolism during maximal exercise in humans. Am J Physiol1996;271:E31-7.
  • Chen Y, Henson S, Jackson AB, Richards JS. Obesity intervention in persons with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2006; 44:82-91.
  • Cherniak EP, Levis S, Troen BR. Hypovitaminosis D: a stealthy epidemic that requires treatment.  Geriatrics 2008;63:24-30.
  • Correa GI, Rotter KP. Clinical evaluation and management of neurogenic bowel after spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2000;38:301-308.
  • Cox SA, Weiss SM, Posuniak EA, Worthington P, Prioleau M, Heffley G. Energy expenditure after spinal cord injury: an evaluation of stable rehabilitating patients. J Trauma 1985;25:419-423.
  • Cruse JM, Lewis RE, Dilioglou S, Roe DL, Wallace WF, Chen RS. Review of immune function, healing of pressure ulcers, and nutritional status in patients with spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med 2000a;23:129-135.
  • Cruse JM, Lewis RE, Roe DL, Dilioglou S, Blaine MC, Wallace WF, Chen RS. Facilitation of immune function, healing of pressure ulcers, and nutritional status in spinal cord injury patients. Exp Mol Pathol 2000b;68:38-54.
  • DeFonzo RA, Ferrannini E.  Insulin resistance. A multifaceted syndrome responsible for NIDDM, obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Diabetes Care 1991;14:173-194.
  • DeVivo MJ, Krause JS, Lammertse DP. Recent trends in mortality and causes of death among persons with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80:1411-1419.
  • Delarue J, Labarthe F, Cohen R. Fish-oil supplementation reduces stimulation of plasma glucose fluxes during exercise in untrained males. British J of Nutr 2003;90:777.
  • Duckworth WC, Jallepalli P, Solomon SS. Glucose intolerance in spinal cord injury, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1983; 64:107-10.
  • Earnest C, Snell P, Rodriguez R, Almada A, Mitchell T. The effect of creatine monohydrate ingestion on anaerobic power indices, muscular strength and body composition. Acta Physiol Scand 1995;153:207-9.
  • Ford ES, Ajani UA, McGuire LC, Liu S.  Concentrations of serum vitamin D and the metabolic syndrome among U.S. adults.  Diabetes Care 2005;28:1228-1230.
  • Gazdar AF, Dammin GJ. Neural degeneration and regeneration in human renaltransplants. New England Journal of Medicine 1970;283:222-224.
  • Greenhaff P, Bodin K, Harris R, et al. The influence of oral creatine supplementation on muscle phosphocreatine resynthesis following intense contraction in man. J Physiol 1993;467:75P.
  • Hadley MN. Nutritional support after spinal cord injury. Neurosurgery 2002; 50:S81-S84.
  • Haffner SM, Stern MP, Hazuda HP, Mitchell BD, Patterson JK.  Cardiovascular risk factors in confirmed prediabetic individuals.  Does the clock for coronary heart disease start ticking before the onset of clinical diabetes?  JAMA 1990;263:2893-2898.   
  • Harris R, Viru M, Greenhaff P, Hultman E. The effect of oral creatine supplementation on running performance during maximal short term exercise in man. J Physiol 1993;467:74P.
  • Heaney RP.  Lessons for nutritional science from vitamin D. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999;69:825-826.
  • Health Canada. Final Policy Paper on Nutraceuticals/Functional Foods and Health Claims on Foods. 1998. Available at: http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/fn-an/alt_formats/hpfb-dgpsa/pdf/label-etiquet/nu....
  • Hirafuji M, Machida T, Hamaue N, Minami M. Cardiovascular protective effects of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids with special emphasis on docosahexaenoic acid. J Pharmacol Sci 2003;92:308-316.
  • Holick, MF.  Vitamin D: Important for prevention of osteoporosis, cardiovascular heart disease, type I diabetes, autoimmune diseases, and some cancers. Southern Medical Association 2005:1024-1027.
  • Hopman MT, Oeseburg B, Binkhorst RA. Cardiovascular responses in paraplegic subjects during arm exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol 1992;65:73-8.
  • Ivy JL. Dietary strategies to promote glycogen synthesis after exercise. Can J Appl Physiol 2001;26:S236-45.
  • Ivy JL. Glycogen resynthesis after exercise: effect of carbohydrate intake. Int J Sports Med 1998;19:S142-5.
  • Jacobs PL, Mahoney ET, Cohn KA, Sheradsky PTA, Green BA. Oral creatine supplementation enhances upper extremity work capacity in persons with cervical-level spinal cord injury. 2002;83:19-23.
  • Jacobs PL, Nash MS, Rusinowski JW. Circuit training provides cardiorespiratory and strength benefits in persons with paraplegia. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001;33:711-7.
  • Javierre C, Vidal J, Segura R, Lizarraga MA, Medina J, Ventura JI. The effect of supplementation with n-3 fatty acids on the physical performance in subjects with spinal cord injury. J Physio Biochem. 2006;62:271-280.
  • Javierre C, Vidal J, Segura R, Medina J, Garrido E. Continual supplementation with n-3 fatty acids does not modify plasma lipid profile in spinal cord injury patients. Spinal Cord 2005;43:527-530.
  • Jehl JL, Gandmontagne M, Pastene G, Eyssette M, Flandrois R, Coudert J. Cardiac output during exercise in paraplegic subjects. Eur J Appl Physiol 1991;62:256-60.
  • Jequier E. The influence of nutrient administration on energy expenditure in man. Clin Nutr. 1986;5181-186.
  • Kendall RW, Jacquemin G, Frost R, Burns SP. Creatine supplementation for weak muscles in persons with chronic tetraplegia: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled crossover trial. J Spinal Cord Med 2005;28:208-213.
  • Ketover SR, Ansel HJ, Goldish G, Roche B, Gebhard RL. Gallstones in chronic spinal cord injury: is impaired gallbladder emptying a risk factor? Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1996 Nov;77(11):1136-8(11):1136-1138.
  • Kocina P. Body composition of spinal cord injured adults. Sports Medicine 1997;23:48-60.
  • Lin KH, Lai JS, Kao MJ, Lien IN. Anaerobic threshold and maximal oxygen consumption during arm cranking exercise in paraplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993;74:515-20.
  • Liusuwan RA, Widman LM, Abresch RT, Johnson AJ, McDonald CM. Behavioral intervention, exercise, and nutrition education to improve health and fitness (BENEfit) in adolescents with mobility impairment due to spinal cord dysfunction. The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine. 2007;30:S119-S126.
  • Lusk G. The specific dynamic action. J Nutrition. 1930;3:519-530.
  • Lynch AC, Palmer C, Lynch AC, Anthony A, Roake JA, Frye J, Frizelle FA. Nutritional and immune status following spinal cord injury: a case controlled study. Spinal Cord 2002;40:627-630.
  • Maki KC, Briones ER, Lanbein WE, Inman-Felton A, Nemchausky B, Welch M et al.  Associations between serum lipids and indicators of adiposity in men with spinal cord injury.  Paraplegia 1995;33:102-109.
  • Mathias CJ. Postprandial hypotension. Pathophyisiological mechanisms and clinical implications in different disorders. Hypertensions. 1991;18:694-704.
  • Mathieu C, Gysemans C, Giulietti A, Bouillon R.  Vitamin D and diabetes.  Diabetologia 2005;48:1247-1257.
  • Mohr  T, Dela F, Handberg A, Biering-Sorensen F, Galbo H, Kjaer M.  Insulin action and long-term electrically induced training in individuals with spinal cord injuries. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001;33:1247-1252.
  • Mollinger LA, Spurr GB, El Ghatit AZ, Barboriak JJ, Rooney CB, Davidoff DD et al.  Daily energy expenditure and basal metabolic rates of patients with spinal cord injury.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1985;66:420-426.
  • Monroe MB, Tataranni PA, Pratley R, Manore MM, Skinner JS, Ravussin E. Lower daily energy expenditure as measured by a respiratory chamber in subjects with spinal cord injury compared with control subjects. Am J Clin Nutr 1998;68:1223-1227.
  • Moussavi RM, Garza HM, Eisele SG, Rodriguez G, Rintala DH. Serum levels of vitamins A, C and E in persons with chronic spinal cord injury living in the community. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003;84:1061-1067.
  • Muller J, Barajas L. Electron microscopic and histochemical evidence for a tubular innervation in the renal cortex of the monkey. Journal of Ultrastructural Research. 1972;41:533-549.
  • Nash MS, Meltzer NM, Martins SC, Burns PA, Lindley SD, Field-Fote EC. Nutrient supplementation post ambulation in persons with incomplete spinal cord injuries: A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled case series. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2007;88:228-233.
  • National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III).  Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) final report.  Circulation 2002; 106: 3143 – 3421.
  • National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults. Executive summary of the Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III).  JAMA 2001; 285: 2486 – 2497.
  • Petchkrua W, Burns SP, Stiens SA, James JJ, Little JW.  Prevalence of vitamin B12 deficiency in spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84:1675-1679.
  • Petchkrua W, Little JW, Burns SP, Stiens SA, James JJ.  Vitamin B12 deficiency in spinal cord injury: a retrospective study. J Spinal Cord Med 2002;26:116-121.
  • Pittet P, Chappuis P, Acheson K, De Techtermann F, Jequier E. Thermic effect of glucose in obese subjects studied by direct and indirect calorimetry. British J Nutr. 1976;35:281-292.
  • Segal KR, Edano A, Tomas MB. Thermic effects if a meal over 3 and 6 hours in lean and obese men. Metabolism. 1990;39:985-992.
  • Segal KR, Gutin B, Nyman A, Pi-Sunyer X. Thermic effect of food at rest, during exercise, and after exercise in lean and obese men of similar body weight. J Clin Invest. 1985;76:1107-1112.
  • Shetty PS, Jung RT, James WPT, Barrand MA, Callingham BA. Postprandial thermogenesis in obesity. Clin Sci. 1981;60:519-525.
  • Simopoulos AP. Essential fatty acids in health and chronic disease. Am J Clin Nutr 1999;70:560S-569S.
  • Snijder MB, van Dam RM, Visser M, et al.  Adiposity in relation to vitamin D status and parathyroid hormone levels: a population-based study in older men and women.  J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2005;90:4119-4123.
  • Spungen AM, Adkins RH, Stewart CA, Wang J, Pierson Jr RN, Waters RL et al.  Factors influencing body composition in persons with spinal cord injury: a cross-sectional study.  J Appl Physiol 2003;95:2398-2407.
  • Spungen AM, Wang J, Pierson Jr RN, Bauman WA.  Soft tissue body composition differences in monozygotic twins discordant for immobilization.  J Applied Physiol 2000;88:1310-1315.
  • Spungen AM, Bauman WA, Wang J, Pierson Jr RN.  The relationship between total body potassium and resting energy expenditure in individuals with paraplegia.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993;73:965-968.
  • Sutters M, Wakefield C, O’Neil K, Appleyard N, Frankel H, Mathias CJ, Peart WS. The cardiovascular, endocrine and renal responses of tetraplegic and paraplegic subjects to dietary sodium restriction. The Journal of Physiology. 1992;457:5151-523.
  • Szlachcic Y, RH Adkins, T Adal, F Yee, W Bauman and RL Waters. The effect of dietary  intervention on lipid profiles in individuals with spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med 2001;24:26-29.
  • Terano T, Hirai A, Hamazaki T, Kobayashi S, Fujita T, Tamura Y, Kumagai A. Effect of oral administration of highly purified eicosapentaenoic acid on platelet function, blood viscosity and red cell deformability in healthy human subjects. Atherosclerosis 1983;46:321-331. Van Loan MD, McCluer S, Loftin JM, Boileau RA. Comparison of physiological responses to maximal arm exercise among ablebodied, paraplegics and quadriplegics. Paraplegia 1987;25:397-405.
  • Warden SJ, Bennell KL, Matthews B, Brown DJ, McMeeken JM, Wark JD.  Efficacy of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound in the prevention of osteoporosis following spinal cord injury. Bone 2001;29:431-436.
  • Weinsier RL, Bacon JA, Birch R. Time-calorie displacement diet for weight control: a prospective evaluation of its adequacy for maintaining normal nutritional status. Int J Obes 1983;7:539-548.
  • Wortsman J, Matsuoka LY, Chen TC, Lu Z, Holick MF.  Decreased bioavailability of vitamin D in obesity.  Am J Clin Nutr 2000;72:690-693.
  • Yekutiel M, Brooks ME, Ohry A, Yarmon J, Carel R.  The prevalence of hypertension, ischaemic heart disease and diabetes in traumatic spinal cord injured patients and amputees. Paraplegia, 1989;27:58-62.
  • Zemper ED, Tat DG, Roller S, Forchheimer M, Chiodo A, Nelson VS, Scelza W. Assessment of a holistic wellness program for persons with spinal cord injuries. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2003;82:957-968.
  • Zhou XJ, Vaziri ND, Segal JL, Winer RL, Eltorai I, Brunnemann BS. Effects of chronic spinal cord injury and pressure ulcer on 25(OH)-vitamin D levels. J Am Paraplegic Soc 1992;16:9-13.

Orthostatic Hypotension

Introduction

The Consensus Committee of the American Autonomic Society and the American Academy of Neurology (CCAAS&AAN 1996) defined orthostatic hypotension (OH) as a decrease in systolic blood pressure of at least 20mmHg, or a reduction in diastolic blood pressure of at least 10mmHg, upon the change in body position from a supine position to an upright posture, regardless of the presence of symptoms. Several studies have documented the presence of OH following SCI (Chelvarajah, 2009, Cariga et al. 2002, Faghri et al. 2001; Mathias 1995).  This condition occurs during the acute period of injury and persists in a significant number of individuals for many years (Claydon et al. 2006; Frisbie & Steele 1997).  Standard mobilization treatment during physiotherapy (e.g., sitting or standing) is reported to trigger blood pressure decreases that are diagnostic of orthostatic hypotension in 74% of SCI patients, and cause symptoms of orthostatic hypotension (such as lightheadedness or dizziness) in 59% of SCI individuals (Illman et al. 2000).  Thus, this may discourage SCI individuals from participating in rehabilitation. Management of OH consists of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions.

The low level of efferent sympathetic nervous activity and the loss of the reflex vasoconstriction following SCI are the two major causes of OH (Table 1).  The decrease in blood pressure following the change to an upright position in individuals with SCI may be related to excessive pooling of blood in the abdominal viscera and lower extremities (Krassioukov & Claydon, 2006; Claydon et al. 2006; Mathias 1995). This decrease is compounded by the loss of lower extremity muscle function post-SCI that is known to be important in counteracting venous pooling in the upright position. Excessive venous pooling in the lower extremities coupled with reduced blood volume in the intrathoracic veins lead to a decrease in ventricular end-diastolic filling pressure and end-diastolic volume thereby decreasing left ventricular stroke volume (Ten Harkel et al. 1994).  The reduced ventricular filling and emptying ultimately lead to a reduction in cardiac output, and thus, arterial pressure (provided the reductions in cardiac output are marked). Unloading of the arterial baroreceptors induces a reflexic reduction in cardiac parasympathetic (vagal) activity. As a result, tachycardia may occur, although this is usually insufficient to compensate for decreased stroke volume.  A reduction in cardiac output results and in turn, arterial blood pressure is reduced. Subsequently, pooling of blood in the lower extremities and decreased blood pressure results in reduced cerebral flow, which presents as a number of signs and symptoms (Table 2).

In addition to central causes of OH following SCI, there is also some evidence suggesting peripheral contributions. For example, upregulation of the potent vasodilator nitric oxide (NO) could potentially contribute to the orthostatic intolerance in this population (Vaziri 2003). In animal studies, it has been shown that NO synthase expression is dysregulated following SCI (Zhao et al. 2007).  Moreover, Wecht and co-investigators found that intravenous infusion of NO synthase inhibitors facilitated normalization of blood pressure in individuals with SCI (Wecht et al. 2007).

Several other factors may predispose individuals with SCI to OH, including low plasma volume, hyponatremia, and cardiovascular deconditioning due to prolonged bed-rest (Claydon et al. 2006; Illman et al. 2000; Mathias 1995).  The prevalence of OH is greater in patients with higher spinal cord lesions, and thus it is more common in tetraplegia (Claydon et al. 2006; Mathias 2006; Frisbie & Steele 1997).  Furthermore, individuals with cervical SCI also experience greater posture-related decreases in blood pressure than those with paraplegia ( Claydon et al. 2006; Mathias 1995).  There is also an increased risk of OH in individuals who sustain a traumatic SCI than in nontraumatic injury such as spinal stenosis (McKinley et al. 1999).

Table 1: Factors Predisposing to OH following SCI

Multifactorial   Claydon et al. 2006
Loss of tonic sympathetic control  Houtman et al. 2000; Wallin & Stjernberg 1984
Altered baroreceptor sensitivity Wecht et al. 2003; Munakata et al. 1997;
Lack of skeletal muscle pumps Faghri & Yount 2002; Raymond et al. 2002
Ten Harkel et al. 1994
Cardiovascular deconditioning  Hopman et al. 2002; Vaziri 2003
Altered salt and water balance Frisbie 2004

Table 2: Signs and Symptoms of OH

  • Light-headedness
  • Dizziness
  • Fainting
  • Blurred vision
  • Fatigue
  • Muscle weakness
  • Syncope (temporary loss of consciousness)

Krassioukov A, Warburton DER, Teasell RW, Eng JJ (2010). Orthostatic Hypotension Following Spinal Cord Injury. In: Eng JJ, Teasell RW, Miller WC, Wolfe DL, Townson AF, Hsieh JTC, Connolly SJ, Mehta S, Sakakibara BM, editors. Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Evidence. Version 3.0. Vancouver: p 1-20.

Pharmacological Management of OH in SCI

The majority of our knowledge in managing OH is obtained from patients presenting OH consequent to non-SCI causes (e.g. heart disease, Parkinson’s disease, dyautonomia).  Numerous medications, including Midodrine, fludrocortisone, and ephedrine, have been successful in managing OH in these chronic conditions.  However, as the mechanisms underlying the development of OH are different in individuals with SCI, it is important to assess the effectiveness of these medications specifically in people with SCI.

Table 3: Pharmacological Management of OH in SCI

Discussion

Midodrine (ProAmatine)

Midodrine, a selective alpha1 adrenergic agonist, exerts its actions by activating the alpha-adrenergic receptors of the arteriolar and venous vasculature, thus producing an increase in vascular tone and blood pressure. In the body, Midodrine has a half-life of approximately 25 minutes. Specifically, plasma levels of Midodrine peak at about half an hour, with this amount halved every 25 minutes. However, the primary metabolite reaches peak blood concentrations about 1 to 2 hours after a dose of Midodrine and has a half-life of about 3 to 4 hours. Usual doses are 2.5mg two or three times daily. Doses are increased quickly until a response occurs or a dose of 30 mg/day is attained (Wright et al. 1998). Midodrine does not cross the blood-brain barrier and is not associated with CNS effects.  Benefits of Midodrine in the OH management in individuals with SCI were reported in a level 2 RCT (Nieshoff et al. 2004), two level 4 studies ( Barber et al. 2000; Senard et al. 1991)  and one level 5 study (Mukand et al. 1992). Of note, a recent case report on 2 male subjects demonstrated urinary bladder dysreflexia with the use of midodrine (Vaidyanathan et al. 2007) and suggests Midodrine should be employed cautiously.    

Although the only controlled trial consisted of 4 subjects (Nieshoff et al. 2004), this study used a rigorous double-blind placebo-controlled, randomized, within-subjects cross-over trial.  Not only was systolic blood pressure increased during peak exercise (3/4 subjects), but exercise performance was also enhanced.  Thus, there is level 2 evidence (Nieshoff et al. 2004) that Midodrine enhances exercise performance in some individuals with SCI, similar to other clinical populations with cardiovascular autonomic dysfunction.  Nevertheless, it would be useful to confirm this evidence with a larger trial.

Fludrocortisone (Florinef)

Fludrocortisone is a mineralocorticoid that induces more salt to be released into the bloodstream. As water follows the movement of salt, fludrocortisone increases blood volume. Furthermore, fludrocortisone may enhance the sensitivity of blood vessels to circulating catecholamine (Van Lieshout et al. 2000; Schatz 1984). The starting dose is 0.1 mg daily. Blood pressure rises gradually over several days with maximum effect at 1-2 weeks.  Doses should be adjusted at weekly or biweekly intervals. Adverse effects include hypokalemia (low potassium), which occurs in 50% of individuals, and hypomagnesemia, which occurs in 5%. Both may need to be corrected with supplements. Fludrocortisone should not be used in persons with congestive heart failure due to its effect on sodium retention.  Headache is a common side effect. The benefit of Fludrocortisone has not been sufficiently proven in individuals with SCI.  One level 4 case series (Barber et al. 2000), one level 5 case report (n=1) (Groomes & Huang 1991), and one level 5 observational (Frisbie & Steele 1997) study described the use of Fludrocortisone for management of OH in the SCI population.

In Barber et al.’s (2000) study involving two patients, no effect of fludrocortisone was observed. However, Groomes & Huang (1991) found an improvement in one patient within 10 days of treatment. The other study conducted by Frisbie and Steele (1997) combined fludrocortisone with other pharmacological and physical agents in three patients; unfortunately, since outcomes specific to this group were not described, the specific effects of fludrocortisone could not be discerned. Therefore, at this point, there remains only level 4 evidence (Barber et al. 2000) from one case series of two patients that fludrocortisone is not effective for OH in SCI.  

Dihydroergotamine

Dihydroergotamine, or Ergotamine, is an ergot alkaloid that interacts with alpha adrenergicreceptors and has selective vasoconstrictive effects on peripheral and cranial blood vessels. Plasma levels peak around 2 hours after ingestion.  One case report combined Ergotamine with fludrocortisone to successfully prevent symptomatic OH in one individual with SCI (Groomes & Huang 1991). Hence, there is level 5 (Groomes & Huang 1991) evidence that Ergotamine, taken daily combined with fludrocortisone, successfully prevents OH in one individual with SCI.

Ephedrine

Ephedrine, a non-selective, alpha and beta receptor agonist, acts centrally and peripherally. Its peripheral actions are attributed partly to norepinephrine release and partly to direct effects on receptors. Ephedrine is usually given at a dosage of 12.5-25 mg, administered orally, three times a day.  Side effects may include tachycardia, tremor and supine hypertension. Ephedrine raises blood pressure both by increasing cardiac output and inducing peripheral vasoconstriction. Its plasma half-life ranges from 3 to 6 hours (Kobayashi et al. 2003). Systematic review of the literature elicited level 5 evidence from one retrospective chart review (Frisbie & Steele 1997) and a cross-sectional observation study (Frisbie 2004). Frisbie (2004) reported that daily urinary output of salt and water was inversely related to the prescribed dose of Ephedrine in 4 patients with OH. While results suggest that Ephedrine resulted in an improvement in hyponatremia, renal conservation of water still exceeded that of sodium in 3 of the 4 cases. Frisbie and Steele (1997) report in their retrospective review of 30 patients taking ephedrine that one dose in the morning is usually sufficient to reduce OH symptoms but that some patients failed to recognize the need for a repeated dose later in the day. Hence, there is level 5 evidence (Frisbie & Steele 1997) that Ephedrine may reduce symptoms of OH.

L-threo-3,4-dihydroxyphenylserine (L-DOPS)

L-DOPS is an exogenous, neutral amino acid that is also a precursor of noradrenalin. Only one published study (Muneta et al. 1992)evaluates the effects of L-DOPS on OH. This level 5 study involving one person with nontraumatic SCI, showed that treatment with salt supplementation in combination with L-threo-3,4-dihydroxyphenylserine, markedly improved the syncope and drowsiness associated with hypotension and increased the patient's daily activity. There is level 5 evidence (Muneta et al. 1992) based on one case study that L-DOPS, in conjunction with salt supplementation may be effective for reducing OH.

Nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME)

L-NAME decreases the production of the vasodilator nitric oxide by inhibiting the expression of its enzyme, nitric oxide synthase. Increased nitric oxide release has been associated with orthostatic intolerance after cardiovascular deconditioning and is proposed to play a role in OH after SCI (Wecht et al. 2007). Only one study (Wecht et al. 2009) was found that examined the use of L-NAME in the treatment of OH following SCI. The study found that after infusion of 1.0 mg/kg of L-NAME, people with tetraplegia had a higher mean arterial pressure in response to head tilt procedure compared with people who received a placebo and this pressure was not significantly different than non-SCI controls.  It should be noted that the increase in mean arterial pressure in the treatment group was not maintained over the entire head tilt procedure.  In summary, there is level 2 evidence that L-NAME increases the blood pressure of SCI subjects following a head up tilt procedure.

General Discussion

In summary, the studies addressing the pharmacological management of OH following SCI involve a small number of trials with low number of subjects and numerous case reports.  Furthermore, it is often difficult to determine the effects of individual medications when used as combination therapies.  Midodrine hydrochloride should be included in the management protocol of OH . Further research needs to quantify the effects of the many pharmacological interventions which have been shown to be effective in conditions other than spinal cord injury.  

Conclusion

  • There is level 2 evidence (from 1 RCT) (Nieshoff et al. 2004) that Midodrine enhances exercise performance in some individuals with SCI, similar to other clinical populations with cardiovascular autonomic dysfunction. 
  • There is level 4 evidence (from 1 case series) (Barber et al. 2000) that fludrocortisone is not effective for OH in SCI.
  • There is level 5 evidence (from 1 case report) (Groomes & Huang 1991) that Ergotamine, combined daily with fludrocortisone, may successfully prevent symptomatic OH.
  • There is level 5 evidence (from 1 observational study) (Frisbie & Steele 1997) that Ephedrine may prevent some symptoms of OH.
  • There is level 5 evidence (from 1 case report) (Muneta et al. 1992) that L-DOPS, in conjunction with salt supplementation may be effective for reducing OH.
  • There is level 2 evidence (from 1 prospective control trial) (Wecht et al. 2009) that L-NAME may be effective for reducing OH.
  • Midodrine hydrochloride should be included in the management protocol of OH in individuals with spinal cord injury.
  • There is limited evidence that fludrocortisone is effective for the management of OH in SCI
  • There is limited evidence that ergotamine is effective for the management of OH in SCI
  • There is little evidence that ephedrine is effective for the management of OH in SCI
  • There is limited evidence that L-DOPS is effective for the management of OH in SCI
  • There is limited evidence that L-NAME is effective for the management of OH in SCI

Non-pharmacological Management of OH in SCI

Of the non-pharmacological studies, three involved the regulation of fluid and salt intake while 14 investigated physical modalities such as abdominal binders, physical activities, and electrical muscle stimulation.

Fluid and Salt Intake for Management of OH in SCI

OH is common among patients with higher levels of paralysis, presents variable symptoms, and often coexists with abnormal salt and water metabolism.  Increases in fluid intake and a diet high in salt can expand extracellular fluid volume and augment orthostatic responses.  This simple intervention appears to be effective in patients with idiopathic OH without SCI (Claydon & Hainsworth 2004; Davidson et al. 1976). 

Table 4: Fluid and Salt Intake for Management of OH in SCI

Discussion

Three out of 4 subjects taking salt supplementation with meals in Frisbie and Steele’s (1997) study became independent of their use of Ephedrine. In 4 patients with OH, Frisbie (2004) demonstrated that the estimated daily intake of salt and water was inversely related to their Ephedrine requirements and suggested that greater salt and water intake may lead to a more balanced renal action. Thus, level 5 evidence from two observation studies (Frisbie & Steele 1997; Muneta et al. 1992) suggest that salt and fluid regulation in conjunction with other pharmacological interventions may reduce symptoms of OH. However, as no evidence exists on the effect of salt or fluid regulation alone for OH management in SCI, these conclusions should be interpreted with caution. As of now, there are no guidelines suggesting appropriate water and salt intake specific to individuals with SCI.

Conclusion

  • There is no evidence on the effect of salt or fluid regulation alone for OH management in SCI. Salt and fluid regulation was evaluated in combination with other pharmacological interventions and thus, the effects of salt and fluid regulation cannot be determined. 
  • The benefits of salt loading have not been sufficiently proven in individuals with SCI.

Effect of Pressure Interventions in Management of OH in SCI

The application of external counterpressure by devices such as abdominal binders or pressure stockings is thought to decrease capacitance of the vasculature beds in the legs and abdominal cavity, both major areas of blood pooling during standing.

Table 5: Pressure Interventions for Management of OH in SCI

Discussion

The studies examining pressure interventions generally test different pressure conditions with the same group of individuals (e.g. with and without stockings) either in a randomized order (RCT) (Hopman et al. 1998a,b) or assigned order (non-RCT) (Krassioukov & Harkema 2006).

The application of these interventions must be interpreted with caution, as none of these studies assessed more than the acute effect of pressure application. Thus, whether these effects would persist with chronic use or cause any detrimental effects upon removal after extended use is unknown. Rimaud et al. (2009), after observing a decrease in venous capacitance, suggest that graduated compression stockings worn by individuals with paraplegia may prevent blood pooling in the legs. The effects were observed when the subjects were at rest and in the absence of orthostatic stress however.Kerk et al. (1995) found no statistically significant effects of abdominal binder use on any of the cardiovascular or kinematic variables at submaximal or maximal levels of exercise. In his review, Bhambhani (2002) concluded that the use of abdominal binders does not influence cardiovascular responses. Conversely, Hopman et al. (1998b) demonstrated in a small group of SCI subjects (n=9) that stockings and an abdominal binder do have effect on cardiovascular responses during submaximal exercises, but not during maximal exercises (Hopman et al. 1998a). Krassioukov &  Harkema (2006) found that the use of a harness (which applies abdominal pressure) during locomotor training increased diastolic blood pressure in those with SCI, but not in able-bodied individuals. Therefore, there is level 2 evidence (from 1 RCT) that pressure from elastic stocking and abdominal binders may improve cardiovascular physiological responses during submaximal, but not maximal, arm exercise.

Conclusion

  • There is conflicting evidence based on limited research that elastic stockings/abdominal binders have any effect on cardiovascular responses in individuals with SCI. 
  • There is level 2 evidence stress (Krassioukov & Harkema 2006) that application of a harness in individuals with SCI could alter baseline cardiovascular parameters and the orthostatic response.
  • There is insufficient evidence that elastic stockings or abdominal binders have any effect on cardiovascular responses in SCI

Effect of FES on OH in SCI

The application of FES triggers intermittent muscle contractions that activate the physiologic muscle pump. The physiologic muscle pump produces a pumping mechanism of both the superficial and deep veins of the legs, thus facilitating venous blood return.

Table 6: FES on OH in SCI

Discussion

FESmay be an important treatment adjunct to minimize cardiovascular changes during postural orthostatic stress in individuals with SCI.  Several studies have suggested that FES-induced contractions of the leg muscles increases cardiac output and stroke volume, which increases venous return (Raymond et al. 2002).  Subsequently, this increases ventricular filling and left ventricular end-diastolic volume (i.e., enhanced cardiac preload). According to the Frank-Starling effect, an increase in ventricular preload will lead to a greater stretch of the myocytes and a concomitant increase in left ventricular stroke volume. The increased stroke volume may produce greater cardiac output and in turn, greater arterial blood pressure. In this manner, FES-induced contraction of the leg muscles may attenuate the drop in systolic BP in response to an orthostatic challenge.

FES-induced contraction of the leg muscles may also artificially restore the body’s ability to redistribute blood from below the level of the lesion back to the heart.In fact, it is through this means that Davis et al. (1990) attributes FES’s effectiveness during an orthostatic challenge. In their study, Davis et al. found FES of leg muscles resulted in increase of cardiac output and stroke volume in 6 males with paraplegia performing maximal arm-crank exercise.  These results suggest that FES of leg muscles could alleviate the lower limb pooling effect during the orthostatic challenge. Chi et al. (2009) suggest that the alleviation of the pooling effect could be further enhanced when FES of leg muscles is combined with passive mobilization. The clinical utility of this combination must be examined further as the subjects used in Chi et al. (2009) were able-bodied.  

FESresults in a dose-dependent increase in blood pressure independent of stimulation site that may be useful in treating orthostatic hypotension (Sampson et al. 2000) andmay be an important treatment adjunct to minimize cardiovascular changes during postural orthostatic stress in individuals with acute spinal cord injury.  Three level 2RCTs (Faghri & Yount 2002; Elokda et al. 2000; Sampson et al. 2000) and five non-randomized controlled trials (Chao & Cheing 2005; Raymond et al. 2002; Faghri et al. 2001; Faghri et al. 1992; Davis et al. 1990) with small sample sizes provide support for use of FES in individuals with SCI.FES of the lower extremity could be used by persons with SCI as an adjunct during standing to prevent orthostatic hypotension and circulatory hypokinesis. An FES-induced leg muscle contraction is an effective adjunct treatment to delay orthostatic hypotension caused by tilting; it allows people with tetraplegia to stand up more frequently and for longer durations (Elokda et al. 2000; Sampson et al. 2000).This effect may be more beneficial to those with tetraplegia who have a compromised autonomic nervous system and may not be able to adjust their hemodynamics to the change in position (Faghri et al. 2001).

Conclusion

  • There is level 2 evidence (from small, lower quality RCTs) (Faghri & Yount 2002; Elokda et al. 2000; Sampson et al. 2000) that FES is an important treatment adjunct to minimize cardiovascular changes during postural orthostatic stress in individuals with SCI.
  • The use of FES is an effective adjunct treatment to minimize cardiovascular changes during changes in position.

Effect of Exercise on OH in SCI

Following exercise, individuals with SCI may experience improvements in the autonomic regulation of their cardiovascular system (Lopes et al. 1984).  Exercise, or even passive movement of the legs, could potentially attenuate reduced central blood volume in individuals with SCI during an orthostatic challenge. For example, Dela et al. 2003, found a pronounced increase in blood pressure in individuals with tetraplegia when their legs were passively moved on a cycle ergometer.  There is also some evidence that exercise training could enhance sympathetic outflow in individuals with SCI, as shown by an increase in catecholamine response to maximal arm ergometry exercise (Bloomfield et al. 1994).

Table 7: Exercise on OH in SCI

Only three exercise studies have attempted to assess the effect of exercise on OH in SCI and these are very diverse in protocol.  Lopes et al. (1984) found no effects on orthostatic tolerance with the addition of upper extremity exercises during a progressive vertical tilt protocol.  Such findings are not surprising given the small muscle mass involved in the upper limbs and the fact that venous pooling occurs primarily in the lower limbs. Ditor et al. (2005) demonstrated that individuals with incomplete tetraplegia retain the ability to make positive changes in cardiovascular autonomic regulation with body weight-support treadmill training. Six months of BWSTT did not substantially affect the ability of SCI subjects to tolerate orthostatic stress, however, the authors found this encouraging as it suggests that orthostatic tolerance is retained after exercise training, even though this intervention probably reduced peripheral vascular resistance. Otsuka et al. (2008) found that individuals with complete tetraplegia who were involved in regular physical activity training (2 hrs/day, 2 days/wk, ≥2 yrs) demonstrated greater tolerance to orthostatic stress than individuals with SCI who were not active (<30 mins/wk).  

Conclusion

  • There is level 2 evidence (from 1 RCT) (Lopes et al. 1984) that simultaneous upper extremity exercises does not improve orthostatic tolerance during a progressive tilt exercise. 
  • There is level 4 evidence (from 1 pre-post study) (Ditor et al. 2005) that 6 months of body-weight support treadmill training does not substantially improve orthostatic tolerance during a tilt test.
  • There is level 4 evidence (from 1 post test study) (Otsuka et al. 2008) that regular physical activity (2hrs/day, 2x/wk, ≥2yrs) may improve  orthostatic tolerance during a tilt test.
  • Simultaneous arm exercise during a tilt test is not effective for improving orthostatic tolerance.
  • The benefits of body-weight supported treadmill training for management of OH have not been sufficiently proven in SCI.
  • There is limited evidence that regular physical activity may improve orthostatic tolerance during a tilt test.

Effect of Standing on OH in SCI

Active stand training that emphasizes active weight bearing is thought to stimulate the neuromuscular system below the level of injury in individuals with SCI and affect the response to orthostatic stress by increasing venous return (Harkema et al. 2008).

Table 8: Standing on OH in SCI

Discussion

Only one study examines the effect of active stand training using the body weight support treadmill system on cardiovascular function among individuals with complete SCI.  Harkema et al., (2008) found that after 80 sessions (60 mins 5x/wk) of active stand training, individuals with complete cervical SCI demonstrated increased resting blood pressure and improvements in the cardiovascular responses to standing.

Conclusion

  • There is level 4 evidence (from 1 pre-post study) (Harkema et al. 2008) that 80 sessions of active stand training improves cardiovascular control such as response to orthostatic stress after cervical SCI.

General Discussion

The major part of our present understanding of pathophysiology and management of incapacitating symptoms of OH is derived from the management of this condition in individuals with both central autonomic neurodegenerative disorders, such as multiple system atrophy and Parkinson’s disease, and peripheral autonomic disorders, such as the autonomic peripheral neuropathies and pure autonomic failure (Freeman 2003; Mathias 1995).  From previous studies in non SCI individuals it is well established that combining patient education with the use of pharmacological and non-pharmacological modalities could lead to successful management of OH.  The therapeutic goal for management of OH is not to normalize the blood pressure values but rather to ameliorate symptoms while avoiding side effects. (Kaufmann et al. 2006)  The general approach in management of OH is that the therapeutic interventions should be implemented in stages dependent upon the severity of symptoms (Kaufmann et al. 2006).  It is also well known from previous studies in non-SCI population that nonpharmacologic measures alone are often insufficient to prevent symptoms of OH.  Pharmacological interventions are needed, particularly in SCI patients with moderate to severe OH symptoms. 

Although a wide array of physical and pharmacological measures are recommended for the general management of OH (Kaufman et al. 2006), very few have been evaluated for use in SCI.  Of the pharmacological interventions, only midodrine has some evidence supporting its use and FES is one of the only non-pharmacological interventions having limited evidence to support its utility. Furthermore, the number of studies addressing the pharmacological management of OH following SCI are few and most are case reports comprised of a small sample size. It is often difficult to determine the effects of individual medications when they are used in combination therapies. Nonetheless, Midodrine hydrochloride should be included in the management protocol of OH in individuals with spinal cord injury while further research needs to quantify the effects of the many pharmacological interventions which have been shown to be effective in conditions other than spinal cord injury.

Summary

  • There is level 2 evidence (from 1 RCT) (Nieshoff et al. 2004) that Midodrine enhances exercise performance in some individuals with SCI, similar to other clinical populations with cardiovascular autonomic dysfunction. 
  • There is level 4 evidence (from 1 case series) (Barber et al. 2000) that fludrocortisone is not effective for OH in SCI.
  • There is level 5 evidence (from 1 case report) (Groomes & Huang 1991) that Ergotamine, combined daily with fludrocortisone, may successfully prevent symptomatic OH.
  • There is level 5 evidence (from 1 observational study) (Frisbie & Steele 1997) that Ephedrine may prevent some symptoms of OH.
  • There is level 5 evidence (from 1 case report) (Muneta et al. 1992) that L-DOPS, in conjunction with salt supplementation may be effective for reducing OH.
  • There is no evidence on the effect of salt or fluid regulation alone for OH management in SCI. Salt and fluid regulation was evaluated in combination with other pharmacological interventions and thus, the effects of salt and fluid regulation cannot be determined. 
  • There is conflicting evidence that elastic stockings/abdominal binders have any effect on cardiovascular responses in individuals with SCI. 
  • There is level 2 evidence stress (from 1 prospective controlled trial) (Krassioukov & Harkema 2006) that application of a harness in individuals with SCI could alter baseline cardiovascular parameters and the response to orthostatic.
  • There is level 2 evidence (from small, lower quality RCTs) (Elokda et al. 2000; Faghri & Yount 2002; Sampson et al. 2000) that FES is an important treatment adjunct to minimize cardiovascular changes during postural orthostatic stress in individuals with SCI.
  • There is level 2 evidence (from 1 RCT) (Lopes et al. 1984) that simultaneous upper extremity exercises does not improve orthostatic tolerance during a progressive tilt exercise. 
  • There is level 4 evidence (from 1 pre-post study) (Ditor et al. 2005) that 6 months of body-weight support treadmill training does not substantially improve orthostatic tolerance during a tilt test.
  • There is level 4 evidence (from 1 pre-post study) (Harkema et al. 2008) that 80 sessions of active stand training improves cardiovascular control such as response to orthostatic stress after cervical SCI.

Key Points

  • Midodrine hydrochloride should be included in the management protocol of OH in individuals with spinal cord injury.
  • There is limited evidence that fludrocortisone is effective for the management of OH in SCI.
  • There is limited evidence that ergotamine is effective for the management of OH in SCI.
  • There is little evidence that ephedrine is effective for the management of OH in SCI.
  • There is limited evidence that L-DOPS is effective for the management of OH in SCI.
  • There is limited evidence that L-NAME is effective for the management of OH in SCI
  • The benefits of salt loading have not been sufficiently proven in individuals with SCI.
  • There is insufficient evidence that elastic stockings or abdominal binders have any effect on cardiovascular responses in SCI
  • The use of FES is an effective adjunct treatment to minimize cardiovascular changes during changes in position.
  • Simultaneous arm exercise during a tilt test is not effective for improving orthostatic tolerance.
  • There is limited evidence that regular physical activity may improve orthostatic tolerance during a tilt test.
  • There is limited evidence that active stand training may improve the response to orthostatic stress in cervical SCI. 

References

  • Barber DB, Rogers SJ, Fredrickson MD, Able AC. Midodrine hydrochloride and the treatment of orthostatic hypotension in tetraplegia: two cases and a review of the literature. Spinal Cord 2000;38:109-111.
  • Bhambhani Y. Physiology of wheelchair racing in athletes with spinal cord injury. Sports Med 2002;32:23-51.
  • Bloomfield SA, Jackson RD, Mysiw WJ. Catecholamine response to exercise and training in individuals with spinal cord injury. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1994;26:1213-1219.
  • Cariga P, Ahmed S, Mathias CJ, Gardner BP. The prevalence and association of neck (coat-hanger) pain and orthostatic (postural) hypotension in human spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2002;40:77-82.
  • Chao CY, Cheing GL. The effects of lower-extremity functional electric stimulation on the orthostatic responses of people with tetraplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86:1427-1433.
  • Chi L, Masani K, Miyatani M, Adam TT, Wayne JK, Mardimae A, Kessler C, Fisher JA. Cardiovascular response to functional electrical stimulation and dynamic tilt table therapy to improve orthostatic tolerance. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2008;18:900-907.
  • Claydon VE, Hainsworth R. Salt supplementation improves orthostatic cerebral and peripheral vascular control in patients with syncope. Hypertension 2004;43:809-813.
  • Claydon VE, Steeves JD, Krassioukov A. Orthostatic hypotension following spinal cord injury: understanding clinical pathophysiology. Spinal Cord 2006;44:341-351.
  • Chelvarajah R. Orthostatic hypotension following spinal cord injury: impact on the use of standing apparatus. NeuroRehabilitation 2009; 24:237-242.
  • Davidson C, Smith D, Morgan DB. Diurnal pattern of water and electrolyte excretion and body weight in idiopathic orthostatic hypotension. The effect of three treatments. Am J Med 1976;61:709-715.
  • Davis GM, Servedio FJ, Glaser RM, Gupta SC, Suryaprasad AG. Cardiovascular responses to arm cranking and FNS-induced leg exercise in paraplegics. J Appl Physiol 1990;69:671-677.
  • Dela F, Mohr T, Jensen CM, Haahr HL, Secher NH, Biering-Sorensen F, Kjaer M. Cardiovascular control during exercise: insights from spinal cord-injured humans. Circulation 2003;107:2127-2133.
  • Ditor DS, Macdonald MJ, Kamath MV, Bugaresti J, Adams M, McCartney N, Hicks AL. The effects of body-weight supported treadmill training on cardiovascular regulation in individuals with motor-complete SCI. Spinal Cord 2005;43:664-673.
  • Elokda AS, Nielsen DH, Shields RK. Effect of functional neuromuscular stimulation on postural related orthostatic stress in individuals with acute spinal cord injury. J Rehabil Res Dev 2000;37:535-542.
  • Faghri PD, Glaser RM, Figoni SF. Functional electrical stimulation leg cycle ergometer exercise: Training effects on cardiorespiratory responses of spinal cord injured subjects at rest and during submaximal exercise. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1992;73:1085-1093.
  • Faghri PD, Yount JP, Pesce WJ, Seetharama S, Votto JJ. Circulatory hypokinesis and functional electric stimulation during standing in persons with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82:1587-1595.
  • Faghri PD, Yount J. Electrically induced and voluntary activation of physiologic muscle pump: a comparison between spinal cord-injured and able-bodied individuals. Clin Rehabil 2002;16:878-885.
  • Freeman R. Treatment of orthostatic hypotension. Semin Neurol 2003;23:435-442.
  • Frisbie JH, Steele DJ. Postural hypotension and abnormalities of salt and water metabolism in myelopathy patients. Spinal Cord 1997;35:303-307.
  • Frisbie JH. Postural hypotension, hyponatremia, and salt and water intake: case reports. J Spinal Cord Med 2004;27:133-137.
  • Groomes TE, Huang CT. Orthostatic hypotension after spinal cord injury: treatment with fludrocortisone and ergotamine. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1991;72:56-58.
  • Harkema SJ, Ferreira CK, van den Brand RJ, Krassioukov AV. Improvements in orthostatic instability with stand locomotor training in individuals with spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma 2008;25:1467-1475.
  • Hopman MT, Dueck C, Monroe M, Philips WT, Skinner JS. Limits to maximal performance in individuals with spinal cord injury. Int J Sports Med 1998a;19:98-103.
  • Hopman MT, Monroe M, Dueck C, Phillips WT, Skinner JS. Blood redistribution and circulatory responses to submaximal arm exercise in persons with spinal cord injury. Scand J Rehabil Med 1998b;30:167-174.
  • Hopman MT, Groothuis JT, Flendrie M, Gerrits KH, Houtman S. Increased vascular resistance in paralyzed legs after spinal cord injury is reversible by training. J Appl Physiol 2002;93:1966-1972.
  • Houtman S, Colier WN, Oeseburg B, Hopman MT. Systemic circulation and cerebral oxygenation during head-up tilt in spinal cord injured individuals. Spinal Cord 2000;38:158-163.
  • Illman A, Stiller K, Williams M. The prevalence of orthostatic hypotension during physiotherapy treatment in patients with an acute spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2000;38:741-747.
  • Kaufmann HC, Freeman RH, Kaplan NM. Treatment of orthostatic and postprandial hypotension. Waltham, MA, 2006.
  • Kerk JK, Clifford PS, Snyder AC, Prieto TE, O'Hagan KP, Schot PK, Myklebust JB, Myklebust BM. Effect of an abdominal binder during wheelchair exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1995;27:913-919.
  • Kobayashi S, Endou M, Sakuraya F, Matsuda N, Zhang XH, Azuma M, Echigo N, Kemmotsu O, Hattori Y, Gando S. The sympathomimetic actions of l-ephedrine and d-pseudoephedrine: direct receptor activation or norepinephrine release? Anesth Analg 2003;97:1239-1245.
  • Krassioukov A, Claydon VE. The clinical problems in cardiovascular control following spinal cord injury: an overview. Prog Brain Res 2006;152:223-229.
  • Krassioukov AV, Harkema SJ. Effect of harness application and postural changes on cardiovascular parameters of individuals with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2006.
  • Lopes P, Figoni SF, Perkash I. Upper limb exercise effect on tilt tolerance during orthostatic training of patients with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1984;65:251-253.
  • Mathias CJ. Orthostatic hypotension and paroxysmal hypertension in humans with high spinal cord injury. Prog Brain Res 2006;152:231-243.
  • Mathias CJ. Orthostatic hypotension: causes, mechanisms, and influencing factors. Neurology 1995;45:S6-11.
  • McKinley WO, Jackson AB, Cardenas DD, DeVivo MJ. Long-term medical complications after traumatic spinal cord injury: a regional model systems analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80:1402-1410.
  • Mukand J, Karlin L, Barrs K, Lublin P. Midodrine for the management of orthostatic hypotension in patients with spinal cord injury: A case report. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82:694-696.
  • Munakata M, Kameyama J, Kanazawa M, Nunokawa T, Moriai N, Yoshinaga K. Circadian blood pressure rhythm in patients with higher and lower spinal cord injury: simultaneous evaluation of autonomic nervous activity and physical activity. J Hypertens 1997;15:1745-1749.
  • Muneta S, Iwata T, Hiwada K, Murakami E, Sato Y, Imamura Y. Effect of L-threo-3, 4-dihydroxyphenylserine on orthostatic hypotension in a patient with spinal cord injury. Jpn Circ J 1992;56:243-247.
  • Nieshoff EC, Birk TJ, Birk CA, Hinderer SR, Yavuzer G. Double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of midodrine for exercise performance enhancement in tetraplegia: a pilot study. J Spinal Cord Med 2004;27:219-225.
  • Otsuka Y, Shima N, Moritani T, Okuda K, Yabe K. Orthostatic influence on heart rate and blood pressure variability in trained persons with tetraplegia. Eur J Appl Physiol 2008;104:75-78.
  • Raymond J, Davis GM, van der Plas M. Cardiovascular responses during submaximal electrical stimulation-induced leg cycling in individuals with paraplegia. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 2002;22:92-98.
  • Rimaud D, Boissier C, Calmels, P. Evaluation of the effects of compression stockings using venous plethysmography in persons with spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med 2008;31:202-207. Sampson EE, Burnham RS, Andrews BJ. Functional electrical stimulation effect on orthostatic hypotension after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000;81:139-143.
  • Schatz IJ. Orthostatic hypotension. II. Clinical diagnosis, testing, and treatment. Arch Intern Med 1984;144:1037-1041.
  • Senard JM, Arias A, Berlan M, Tran MA, Rascol A, Montastruc JL. Pharmacological evidence of alpha 1- and alpha 2-adrenergic supersensitivity in orthostatic hypotension due to spinal cord injury: a case report. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1991;41:593-596.
  • Ten Harkel AD, van Lieshout JJ, Wieling W. Effects of leg muscle pumping and tensing on orthostatic arterial pressure: a study in normal subjects and patients with autonomic failure. Clin Sci (Lond) 1994;87:553-558.
  • The Consensus Committee of the American Autonomic Society and the American Academy of Neurology. Consensus statement on the definition of orthostatic hypotension, pure autonomic failure, and multiple system atrophy. Neurol 1996;46:1470.
  • Vaidyanathan S, Soni SBM, Hughes PL. Midodrine: Insidious development of urologic adverse effects in patients with spinal cord injury: A report of 2 cases. Advances in Therapy 2007; 24(4): 712-720.
  • Van Lieshout JJ, ten Harkel AD, Wieling W. Fludrocortisone and sleeping in the head-up position limit the postural decrease in cardiac output in autonomic failure. Clin Auton Res 2000;10:35-42.
  • Vaziri ND. Nitric oxide in microgravity-induced orthostatic intolerance: relevance to spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med 2003;26:5-11.
  • Wallin BG, Stjernberg L. Sympathetic activity in man after spinal cord injury. Outflow to skin below the lesion. Brain 1984;107:183-198.
  • Wecht JM, De Meersman RE, Weir JP, Spungen AM, Bauman WA. Cardiac autonomic responses to progressive head-up tilt in individuals with paraplegia. Clin Auton Res 2003;13:433-438.
  • Wecht JM, Weir JP, Krothe AH, Spungen AM, Bauman WA. Normalization of supine blood pressure after nitric oxide synthase inhibition in persons with tetraplegia. J Spinal Cord Med 2007;30:5-9.
  • Wecht JM, Radulovic M, LaFountaine M, Rosado-Rivera D, Zhang RL, Bauman W. Orthostatic responses to nitric oxide synthase inhibition in persons with tetraplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 90:1428-1434.
  • Wright RA, Kaufmann HC, Perera R, Opfer-Gehrking TL, McElligott MA, Sheng KN, Low PA. A double-blind, dose-response study of midodrine in neurogenic orthostatic hypotension. Neurology 1998;51:120-124.
  • Zhao J, Wecht JM, Zhang Y, Wen X, Zeman R, Bauman WA, Cardozo C. iNOS expression in rat aorta is increased after spinal cord transaction: a possible cause of orthostatic hypotension in man. Neurosci Lett 2007;415:210-214.

Pain Management

Introduction

The last few decades have witnessed increasing sophistication and advances in the rehabilitation of spinal cord injured (SCI) patients with marked improvements in the quality of care accompanied by significant reductions in morbidity and mortality.  Despite these impressive gains in bladder, skin, cardiovascular and respiratory care, the treatment of chronic pain in SCI has proven largely refractory to medical management.  This lack of treatment efficacy has been complicated by an incomplete understanding of pain in individuals with spinal cord injuries and lack of a standardized framework upon which to classify these injuries (Burchiel and Hsu 2001).

Teasell RW, Mehta S, Aubut J, Foulon BL, Wolfe DL, Hsieh JTC, Townson AF, Short C (2010). Pain Following Spinal Cord Injury. In Eng JJ, Teasell RW, Miller WC, Wolfe DL, Townson AF, Hsieh JTC, Connolly SJ, Mehta S, Sakakibara BM, editors. Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Evidence. Version 3.0.

Incidence, Quality and Significance


Incidence of Pain Post SCI

Pain is a frequent complication of traumatic spinal cord injury.  Reported estimates of the incidence of pain following SCI range anywhere from 11 to 94% (Botterell 1953, Burke 1973, Davidoff 1987, Davis 1947, Donovan 1982, Kaplan 1962, Kennedy 1946, Munro 1948, 1950, Nashold 1981) with more recent studies reporting an incidence from 48-94% (Davidoff et al. 1987, Cohen et al. 1988, Rose et al. 1988, Britell and Mariano 1991, Mariano 1992, Cairns et al. 1996).  Estimates of debilitating or disabling pain range from 11-34% (Botterell 1953, Davis 1947, Kaplan 1962, Munro 1948, Nepomunceno 1979).  Bonica (1991) noted that on combining the data on 6 reported studies of pain in SCI and 1,028 subjects (Botterell 1953, Burke 1973, Davis 1947, Nepomunceno 1979, Rose 1988, Woolsey 1986), 53% had various types of “deafferent” pain.  These wide ranging estimates are felt to be a reflection of significant heterogeneity in defining pain in this population.

Bonica (1991) reviewed data contained in 10 reports that surveyed 2,449 SCI patients (Botterell 1953, Britell 1986, Burke 1973, Davis 1947, Kaplan 1962, Munro 1950, Nepomunceno 1979, Richards 1980, Rose 1988, Woolsey 1986).  Chronic pain was present in 1,695 (69%) and in 30% of these patients it was rated as severe.  Six of the reports (Botterell 1953, Burke 1973, Davis 1957, Nepomunceno 1979, Rose 1988, Woolsey 1986) analyzed the different types of pain.  Out of a total of 1,965 patients, 608 (31%) of the patients had central pain/dysesthesia/phantom limb pain, 219 (12%) had root pain, and 198 (10%) had visceral pain caused by a central mechanism.  There were 1,028 (53%) SCI patients with deafferentation pain.

Impact on Quality of Life

It is estimated that 30-40% of patients with SCI experience severe disabling pain (burke and Woodward 1976). Pain is often reported as the most important factor for decreased quality of life.  Nepomuceno (1979) noted that 23% of individuals with cervical or high thoracic SCI and 37% of those with low thoracic or lumbosacral injury would trade the loss of sexual and/or bowel and bladder function as well as hypothetical possibility for cure to obtain pain relief.

Rose et al. (1988) sent a questionnaire to 1,091 spinal cord injured individuals.  “Suitable” replies were received from 885 subjects with a total of 615 reporting pain at or below the level of the injury.  In 110 subjects this occurred in a nerve root distribution with the remainder below the neurological level of SCI.  Pain, which was reported as constant in 43%, was considered severe at some point in the day in half the sample and mild to moderate in 21% of respondents.  Prior to the SCI, 595 of the sample were employed; afterwards only 325 were employed.  Interestingly 98 SCI individuals (11%) reported it was the severity of their pain and not their paralysis, which stopped them from working.  269 of the 325 SCI subjects (83%) who were employed reported that the pain interfered with their work.  A total of 118 SCI subjects found that the pain was severe enough to stop social activity.  Pain appeared to be more severe in the evening and at night, interfering with sleep in 325 of respondents (37%).  This study clearly pointed out the importance of chronic pain in determining disability and morbidity in SCI patients (Rose 1988).

  • Pain post SCI has a significant effect of quality of life.

Severe Pain and SCI Location

Persons with SCI who complain of severe pain are more likely to have low spinal cord or cauda equina lesions (Ragnarsson 1997, Davis and Martin 1947, Botterell et al. 1953, Nepomuceno et al. 1979).  Severe pain was noted in 10-15% of persons with quadriplegia; 25% of those with thoracic paraplegia and 42-51% of those with lesions of the cauda equina (Ragnarsson 1997)

Natural History of SCI Pain

One study examining the timing of the development of pain post-SCI noted that in 901 patients with SCI, pain started immediately after SCI in 34%, within the first year in 58%, pain increased over time in 47% and decreased over time in 7%. (Turner et al 2001). Turner et al. (2001) noted that pain most often started within the first 6 months following SCI. This has also been noted in several other studies (Turner and Cardenas 1999, Stormer et al.1997, Nepomuceno et al. 1979, Siddall et al. 1999).

Conclusion

  • For many SCI patients, pain has a significant impact on quality of life.
  • Over 50% of SCI patients develop chronic pain.  Severe pain is more common the lower down the lesion in the spinal cord. Pain post SCI most often begins within the first 6-12 months post-SCI. 
  • Post-SCI pain is common and often severe beginning relatively early post-injury. 

Location and Quality of SCI Pain

Widerstrom-Noga et al. (2001) conducted a careful analysis of the relationship between the location of the pain and the patients’ description of the pain.  In this study 217 of 330 patients reporting chronic pain in a previous survey agreed to participate in the study.  Participants had been injured for an average of 8.2 ± 5.1 years and 55.4% were quadriplegic.  Most subjects in this study marked multiple areas on a pain drawing with the back area being most frequently implicated (61.8%).  59.9% complained of a burning pain while 54.9% described an aching pain.  Interestingly burning pain was significantly associated with pain localized to the front of the torso and genitals, buttocks and lower extremities.  In contrast, aching type pain was significantly associated with pain localized to the neck, shoulders and back.

Widerstrom-Noga et al. (2001) noted that the descriptor “burning” is often associated with neuropathic pain (Siddall et al. 1999, Ragnarsson 1997, Fenollosa et al. 1993) whereas “aching” is often associated with musculoskeletal pain (Siddall et al. 1999, Tunks 1986).  However, since there is a significant overlap in the quality of pain types it is difficult to establish a definitive clinical relationship(Eide 1998, Bowsher 1996, Widerstrom-Noga et al. 2001).  The authors then go on to suggest that musculoskeletal-type pain (best characterized by the aching pain in the neck, shoulders and back) is potentially amenable to therapeutic interventions and aggressive attempts should be made to ameliorate this type of pain.  All of this underscores the need for a reproducible classification system of the pain experienced following SCI.  Bennett et al (2007) have noted that the increasing reliance on validated screening tools may help “form the basis of forthcoming clinical diagnostic criteria”.

Conclusion

  • The most common types of pain post SCI are: 1) a burning pain (likely neuropathic) usually localized to the front of torso, buttock or legs or 2) an aching pain (likely musculoskeletal) usually localized to the neck, shoulders and back.
  • Post-SCI pain is most commonly divided into neuropathic or musculoskeletal pain.

Classification of SCI Pain

Siddall et al. (1997) noted that one of the concerns regarding SCI-related pain was a lack of consensus over a classification system for SCI pain.  This has led to considerable variation in incidence and prevalence rates for pain post SCI depending on the classification system used.  Twenty-eight (28) classification schemes have been published between 1947 and 2000.   A Task Force on Pain Following Spinal Cord Injury of the International Association for the Study of Pain has introduced a taxonomy, which classified SCI pain based on presumed etiology (Burchiel and Hsu 2001, Siddall 2000).

Table 1 Proposed IASP Classification of Pain Related to SCI (Burchiel & Hsu 2001)

Table 2 SCI pain types according to major classification

Table 3 Reliability of SCI pain classification systems

A new International Classification of Spinal Cord Injury Pain (ICSCIP) has been proposed.  This new classification aims to be more comprehensive in the types of pain directly related to or commonly found in individuals with SCI.

Musculoskeletal or Mechanical Pain

Musculoskeletal or mechanical pain occurs at or above the level of the lesion and is due to changes in bone, tendons or joints (Guttmann 1973).  This is referred to as nociceptive pain caused by a variety of noxious stimuli to normally innervated parts of the body (Ragnarsson 1997).  Overuse of remaining functional muscles after spinal cord injury or those recruited for unaccustomed activity may be of primary importance in some patients (Farkash 1986).  Pain may also be secondary to spinal osteoporosis or facet arthropathy (Farkash 1986).  Instability of the vertebral column may also be a problem (Farkash 1986).  Pain is usually dull and aching in character and although more common soon after SCI, it may become chronic.

Sie et al. (1992) studied 239 SCI outpatients for the presence of upper extremity pain.  Of the 136 patients with quadriplegia, 55% reported upper extremity pain, most commonly at the shoulder (46% of all subjects).  In the case of shoulder pain, 45% were orthopedic-related including tendonitis, bursitis, capsulitis and osteoarthritis.  Of the 103 paraplegics, 66 reported upper extremity pain with two-thirds reporting symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome and 13 reporting musculoskeletal-related shoulder pain. Daylan et al (1999), in a questionnaire returned by 130 SCI patients, found that 58.5% of patients reported upper extremity pain. Of these, 71% had shoulder pain, 53% wrist pain, 43% hand pain, and 35% elbow pain. Pain was most likely to be associated with pressure relief, transfers, and wheelchair mobility. Subbarao et al (1995), in a survey of 800 SCI patients, found that 72.7% of responders reported some degree of chronic pain at the wrist and shoulder, with wheelchair propulsion and transfers being responsible for most of the pain. McCasland et al (2006) noted that in their survey, 70% of SCI had shoulder pain, one-third had a previous injury to their shoulder and 52% reported a bilateral pain. Quadriplegics were more likely to have shoulder pain (80%). Previous shoulder trauma increased the risk of having shoulder pain.

Central or Neurogenic Dysesthetic Pain

"Central" dysesthesia or "deafferentation" pain is the most common type of pain experienced below the level of SCI and is generally characterized as a burning, aching and/or tingling sensation.  In many cases this dysesthetic or deafferentation pain has defied a pathophysiological explanation (Britell, 1991) although most researchers firmly support a central nervous system origin for this pain.  Nashold (1991) goes as far as stating that except for radicular pain, all other pains of paraplegia are central or deafferentation in origin.  This pain is most often perceived in a generalized manner below the level of the lesion, often a diffuse burning type of pain (Britell 1991, Tunks 1986).  Burning pain is reportedly most common with lesions at the lumbar levels, although it may be found with SCI at thoracic and cervical levels (Tunks 1986).  Nashold (1991) reported this pain occurred almost immediately after SCI and persisted.

Beric (1997) refers to this pain as central dysesthetic pain (CDP) and found dissociative sensory loss and absence of spinothalamic-anterolateral functions, with different degrees of dorsal column function preservation present almost exclusively in incomplete SCI patients.  CDP takes weeks or months to appear and is often associated with recovery of some spinal cord function.  Paradoxically CDS is often characterized by complete loss of temperature, pinprick, and pain perception below the level of the lesion.  It rarely occurs in spinal cord Injuries with complete sensory loss or loss of both sensory and motor functions below the level of the lesion.  Davidoff et al. (1987a) concurred and further noted dysesthetic pain was more likely to be found in incomplete paraplegia resulting from penetrating wounds of the spinal cord, and in spinal fractures treated with conservative management.   

A number of factors may contribute to exacerbations of these "central" pain syndromes; these include visceral diseases or disturbances, movement, smoking or alcohol, emotional factors, fatigue, and even weather changes (Botterell 1953, Davis 1947, Davis 1975, Tunks 1986).  Pressure sores, particularly if infected, or an occult injury such as a fracture, may result in an increase in burning, dysesthetic pain.  These stimuli often provoke autonomic dysreflexic-like symptoms and simultaneously also may aggravate this "burning" pain.

Borderzone or Segmental Pain

Individuals with SCI frequently experience a band of pain and hyperalgesia at the border zone between diminished or abnormal and preserved sensation (Tunks 1986, Botterell 1953, Davis 1975, Heliporn 1978, Kaplan 1962, Maury 1978, Melzack 1978, Michaelis 1970).  In the more recent literature, this segmental pain is further described as occurring at or just above the level of sensory loss in the cutaneous transition zone from the area of impaired/lost sensation to areas of normal sensation, involving at least one to three dermatomes (Friedman 1989, Nashold 1991, Ragnarsson 1997) and is often associated with spontaneous painful tingling or burning sensations in the same area.   Ragnarsson (1997) also noted that in an individual with a cervical cord injury, segmental pain may be described as tingling, burning or numbing pain in the shoulders, arms or hands, those with a thoracic cord injury frequently describe a circumferential, feeling of tightness and pain around the chest and abdomen while lumbar lesions tend to be localized to the groins and different parts of the lower extremities.  According to Nashold (1991) paraplegics often complain that touching the skin in the pain region activates the pain causing it to radiate into the lower parts of the body, especially the legs.  Pain can be triggered by stroking and/or touching the skin in adjacent painful dermatomes (Nashold 1991).  Even light touch or the pressure of clothing or bed sheets over this region may provoke marked discomfort (Tunks 1986).  It may be accompanied by sweating or vasodilation at or below the level of hyperalgesia.  Segmental pain is generally symmetrical although a partial spinal cord injury with asymmetrical neurological involvement will produce asymmetries (Nashold 1991). 

This pain has also been described as "neuropathic at level pain" (Siddall et al 1997) Although several theories have been proposed (Tunks 1986, Nashold 1981, Pollock 1951, Matthews 1972, Levitt 1983, Melzack 1978) the neurological mechanism responsible for this area of hyperalgesia after spinal injury is not well understood (Farkesh 1986).  Although radicular pain is most severe in incomplete SCI lesions, it is also seen in transected cauda equina lesions which are by definition radicular types of pain (Heaton 1965, Siddall et al. 1997). It may also be secondary to spinal cord instability by facet or disc material, or to direct damage to the nerve root during the initial injury (Burke 1973, Nashold 1991).  This “radicular” pain is associated with sensory change in the involved painful dermatome (Nashold 1991) and is most common to cervical or lumbosacral nerve roots.  Non-neural structures, such as the dura mater, have also been suggested as a source of radicular pain (Cyriax 1969, Farkash 1986).  In addition, it has been suggested that central borderzone pain may be generated in the damaged spinal cord just proximal to the spinal cord injury (Nashold 1991, Pollock 1951).  Unfortunately, unless there is definitive evidence on imaging of nerve root damage, it is difficult to distinguish between these various mechanisms of pain.

To reflect this uncertainty Siddall et al. (1997) in their proposed classification of SCI pain note that this "neuropathic at level pain" is divided into radicular and central pain.  Radicular pain is due to nerve root pathology while central pain is due to changes within the spinal cord or possibly supraspinal structures.  Pain attributable to nerve root damage is suggested by features of neuropathic pain (i.e. burning, stabbing, shooting, electric-like pain, allodynia) and increased pain with spinal movement. Sjolund (2002) notes that this pain is thought to occur from nerve root entrapment and may occasionally benefit from decompression.

However, pain, which appears radicular in nature, may occur in the absence of nerve root damage.  This leads to the second grouping of borderzone pain, namely central pain or that which is due to pathology within the spinal cord thought to be the result of damage to the gray matter of the dorsal horn of the spinal cord (Ragnassaron 1997, Woolsey 1995).  According to Ragnassaron (1997), such an injury “has been said to result in hyperactivity of the nociceptor cells within the dorsal horn (Nashold and Bullitt 1981, Nashold and Ostdahl 1979)which can be electrically recorded (Nashold and Alexander 1989).”    Sojlund(2002) notes that this second type of at level neuropathic pain is experienced as a girdle pain uni- or bilaterally in 2-4 segments of the transitional region.  This pain is described as stimulus independent, often accompanied by troublesome allodynia or hyperalgesia and thought to arise from segmental deafferentation (Sjolund 2002).

Psychological Factors

Most studies of chronic SCI pain have focused on the medical causes and clinical manifestations of pain while much less is understood about how psychosocial factors impact SCI pain (Summers 1991).  A negative psychosocial environment along with increased age, depression, anxiety and intellect were found to be associated with reports of greater post-SCI pain severity interfering with activities of daily living (Richards et al. 1980).  Greater pain severity was not associated with physiological factors such as injury level, completeness of injury, surgical fusion and/or instrumentation or veteran status.  The authors were unable to distinguish whether the psychological factors were a consequence of, or contributors to, greater pain severity.  Summers et al (1991) studied 54 SCI patients (19 with quadriplegia and 35 with paraplegia) and of these, 42 patients assessed with the Pain questionnaire found that anger and negative cognitions were associated with greater pain severity.  Severity of pain was higher in patients who reported pain in response to a question on general well being , those that were less accepting of their disability and those that perceived that a significant other would express punishing responses to their pain  behaviours.  Pain itself was found to be associated with greater emotional distress than the SCI itself.  The authors concluded that the experience of pain was associated with psychosocial factors.  Hence treatment of post-SCI pain should involve these multidimensional aspects.

Cohen et al. (1988) found that patients with complete SCIs reported significantly less severe pain than did pain clinic patients.  However, they did not differ from patients with incomplete lesions.  Patients with complete SCIs and pain clinic patients showed a significantly more disturbed MMPI (Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory)profile than did patients with incomplete SCIs.  It was hypothesized that those patients with complete lesions view themselves as more functionally limited than patients with incomplete lesions, and the completeness of the SCI may be more important in determining psychosocial adjustment than pain per se.  Rintala (1998) in community-based men with SCI found that chronic pain was associated with more depressive symptoms, more perceived stress and poorer self-assessed health.

Woollaars et al (2007) administered questionnaires to persons with a SCI. Of the potential 575 subjects, 49% provided responses. SCI pain prevalence was 77%. Factors associated with less pain intensity included more internal pain control and coping, less catastrophizing, a higher level of lesion and a non-traumatic SCI cause. More pain was associated with greater pain-related disability. Lower catastrophizing was related to better health. Factors related to greater well-being included less helplessness and catastrophizing, greater SCI acceptance and lower anger levels. Greater levels of depression were associated with higher levels of SCI helplessness, catastrophizing and anger. The authors noted that chronic SCI pain and quality of life were both largely associated with several psychological factors of which pain catastrophizing and SCI helplessness were more important. Surprisingly, pain intensity showed no independent relationships with health, well-being and depression.

Widerström-Noga et al (2007) studied 190 patients with SCI and chronic pain and were able to identify 3 subgroups. The first group was described as ‘dysfunctional’, characterized by higher pain severity, life interference, affective distress scores, and lower levels of life control and activities scores. The second group was described as ‘interpersonally supported’, characterized by moderately high pain severity, and higher life control, support from significant other, distracting responses, solicitous response, and activities scores. The final group was described as ‘adaptive copers’, characterized by lower pain severity, life interference, affective distress , support from significant others, distracting responses, solicitous responses, activities and higher life control scores. Compared with dysfunctional subgroup, the interpersonally supported group reported significantly greater social support.

Catastrophizing and Pain Post SCI

When pain post SCI is refractory to pharmacological and surgical treatment, it is important to fully understand the negative impact of the patient’s psychosocial environment prior to undertaking more invasive approaches to treatment.

Table 4 Catastrophizing and Pain Post SCI

Giardino et al (2003)noted that pain-related catastrophizing, or exaggerating the negative consequences of a situation has been associated with greater pain intensity, emotional distress and functional disability in patients with chronic pain conditions and SCI. This was thought to provide partial support for a “communal coping” model of catastrophizing, where catastrophizing in persons with pain may function as a social communication directed toward obtaining social proximity, support or assistance.

Non-Pharmacological Management of Post-SCI Pain

Before moving to pharmacological and surgical interventions, it is important to deal with those factors which may intensify or worsen the experience of pain.  As mentioned previously, SCI pain may be worsened by decubitus ulcers, a urinary tract infection or stone, autonomic dysreflexia, increased spasticity, anxiety, depression, psychosocial factors and other contributors to post-SCI pain (Davis 1998, Tunks 1986).  There are a number of non-pharmacological interventions for post-SCI pain which have been studied from massage to hypnosis.

Massage and Heat

Massage and heat are used primarily to treat musculoskeletal pain.  Their benefit is well known in a number of musculoskeletal pain disorders, although there are significant differences among therapists as to how treatment is delivered.

Table 5 Massage and Heat in Post-SCI Pain

It stands to reason that local heat and massage therapy would be most effective for musculoskeletal pain post-SCI.Budh and Lundeberg (2004)in a survey of SCI patients 3 years post-injury found massage and heat were the best non-pharmacological treatments. No prospective studies examining heat and massage as treatment modalities for post-SCI pain have conducted.

Conclusion

  • There is limited level 4 evidence that massage and heat are the best non-pharmacological treatments for pain post-SCI
  • Massage and heat may be helpful for post-SCI pain.

Acupuncture

Acupuncture is a component of traditional Chinese medicine that has been used for the treatment of pain for thousands of years and is based on the premise that illness arises from the imbalance of energy flow (Qi) through the body (Dyson-Hudson et al. 2001).  Needle acupuncture involves inserting fine needles into specific points to correct these imbalances (Pomeran 1998; NIH Consensus 1998; Wong & Rapson 1999; Dyson-Hudson et al. 2001). Acupuncture has been shown to activate type II and type III muscle afferent nerves or A delta fibers, blocking the pain gate by stimulating large sensory neurons as well as releasing endogenous opioids, neurotransmitters and neurohormones (Pomeran 1998; Wong & Rapson 1999; Dyson-Hudson et al. 2001).

Table 6 Acupuncture in Post-SCI Pain

Discussion

Dyson-Hudson and colleagues conducted two RCTs (2001; 2007) examining the effect of a 10 treatment, 5 week program of manually stimulated acupuncture on shoulder pain compared to two different control interventions.  In the first study, Dyson-Hudson et al. (2001),compared acupuncture treatment to Trager Psychosocial Integration performed by a certified Trager practitioner.  Trager therapy is a form of bodywork and movement re-education designed to induce relaxation and encourage the patient to identify and correct painful patterns.  It was hypothesized that chronically contracted muscles shortened by stress led to pain (Dyson-Hudson et al. 2001).  There was a significant effect over time for both treatments in reducing shoulder pain but there was no difference between the two groups.  The second RCT, (Dyson-Hudson et al. 2007) examined acupuncture against sham acupuncture (i.e. minimal depth needle insertion at nonspecific anatomic sites). The results suggested that acupuncture was no more effective than sham acupuncture for the treatment of shoulder pain post SCI and/or that there may be a significant placebo effect associated with these interventions.

Nayak et al. (2001)administered 15 acupuncture treatments over a 7.5-week period of time.  Pain intensity decreased from pre-treatment to post-treatment with post-treatment decline in pain intensity being maintained at 3 month follow-up.  Despite these results, 54.5% of those treated reported a worsening of pain after treatment.Those that reported pain below their injury did not respond to treatment (p<.05).  Those who reported pain relief at 3 month follow-up reported only moderate levels of pain intensity at the beginning of the study compared to those who did not report pain relief at follow-up (p<.01).  With the overall reduction in pain intensity there were also a decrease in pain interference with ADLs and an improvement in overall well being.  The authors felt that 50% of patients demonstrated improvement in their pain with acupuncture.

Rapson et al. (2003)asked patients to rate their pain intensity according to a visual analogue scale after electroacupuncture treatments.  Sixty-seven percent (24/36) of patients reported improvement, with improvement best for those with bilateral symmetric constant burning pain.

Banerjee (1974) reported on five patients who developed burning, distressing pain below the level of SCI and who responded to transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) strong enough to lead to muscle contraction below the level of injury.  The exact mechanism of action for this analgesic response was not delineated.

Conclusion

  • There is level 1 evidence that in general acupuncture is no more effective than Trager therapy or sham acupuncture in reducing nociceptive musculoskeletal shoulder pain post SCI.
  • There is level 4 evidence that acupuncture and electroacupuncture reduces neuropathic pain of patients with SCI.
  • Acupuncture may reduce post-SCI pain.

Exercises for Post-SCI Pain

Exercise has been shown to improve subjective well-being for individuals with chronic disease and disability.

Table 7 Exercises for Post-SCI Pain

Discussion

Ginis et al. (2003) studied SCI patients who underwent a regular exercise program and compared them to SCI patients who did not.  Those who underwent the regular exercise program experienced a significant improvement in pain scores which in turn accounted for improved depression scores.  Ditor et al. (2003) found that pain scores were negatively correlated with adherence to a later exercise program.

Conclusion

  • There is level 1 evidence that a regular exercise program significantly reduces post-SCI pain.
  • Regular exercise reduces post-SCI pain.

Exercises for Shoulder Pain

Shoulder pain is a common form of musculoskeletal pain following SCI and is often the result of increased physical demands, awkward or over-use of the upper extremities as the individual with SCI compensates for loss of lower limb functioning (Curtis et al, 1999).  Curtis et al. (1999) has noted, “tightness of the anterior shoulder musculature, combined with weakness of the posterior shoulder musculature both seem to contribute to development of shoulder pain in wheelchair users (Curtis et al 1999, Burnham et al. 1993, Powers et al. 1994, Millikan et al. 1991)and may be further complicated by paralysis and spasticity in the individual with tetraplegia (Silverskiold and Waters 1991, Powers et al. 1994)”.  The prevalence of shoulder pain in SCI individuals ranges between 30-100% (Curtis et al. 1999) and is a consequence of increased physical demands and overuse (Pentland and Twomey 1991, 1994, Nichols et al. 1979).

Table 8 Shoulder Pain Management Post SCI

Discussion

Curtis et al. (1999) in a RCT studied the effectiveness of a 6-month exercise protocol on shoulder pain experienced by wheelchair users where 42 patients were randomized into a treatment and a control group.  Over 75% of all subjects reported a history of shoulder pain since beginning wheelchair use and 50% in both groups had current shoulder pain at the start of the study. The treatment group performed two exercises designed to stretch the anterior shoulder musculature and 3 exercises for strengthening the posterior shoulder musculature.  Compliance rates were higher-over 83% of the subjects completed the 6-month protocol.  Subjects in the treatment group decreased their average PC-WUSPI score by an average of 39.9% vs. only 2.5% in the control group.  Despite this very significant change, 48.3% decreased in the paraplegic group and 27.2% in the tetraplegic group, the treatment group still had a higher mean score than the control group at the end of the study because of disparate baseline scores.

Nawoczenski et al. (2006) in a prospective controlled trial, found 21 SCI patients who participated in an ‘at-home’ exercise program experienced significant improvement in their WUSPI scores and on the Shoulder Rating Questionnaire (SRQ), when compared to subjects who did not participate in the exercise program. Exercises were designed to strengthen and stretch specific scapular and rotator cuff muscles. The authors concluded the exercises were effective at reducing pain and improving function. 

In a pre-post study, Nash et al. (2007) reported that strength and anaerobic power of the upper extremities increased following 16 weeks of circuit training, while shoulder pain scores decreased significantly (p=0.008).

Finley and Rogers (2007) studied 17 patients including 9 SCI patients with a special wheelchair (MAGIC wheels 2-gear wheelchair).  They found use of this particular chair reduced shoulder pain.

Conclusion

  • There is level 2 evidence (from one RCT and one PCT) that a shoulder exercise protocol reduces the intensity of shoulder pain post-SCI.
  • There is level 4 evidence that the MAGIC wheels 2-gear wheelchair results in less shoulder pain.
  • A shoulder exercise protocol reduces post-SCI shoulder pain intensity.
  • MAGIC wheels 2 gear wheelchair reduces shoulder pain.

Behavioural Management of Pain Post SCI

Hypnotic Suggestions

Hypnosis has been used to reduce pain in a number of painful clinical conditions as well as experimental pain (Jensen et al 2000).  Hypnosis is appealing as a potential treatment because it is nonpharmacological although its use is controversial given the variability in hypnotic responsiveness.

Table 9 Hypnotic Suggestion and Post-SCI Pain

Discussion

Jensen et al. (2000), in a before and after study, examined the impact of hypnosis on pain post-SCI.  Eighty-six percent (86%) of the SCI patients reported a decrease in pain intensity and unpleasantness after hypnosis.  There was no control group.

Conclusion

  • There is level 2 evidence that hypnosis reduces pain intensity post SCI.
  • Hypnosis may reduce pain intensity post SCI.

Cognitive Behavioural Therapy

Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) is a commonly used psychological intervention for chronic pain.  Often used as a part of a more comprehensive pain management program, it attempts to modify beliefs and coping skills, particularly when these beliefs and coping skills are dysfunctional.

Table 10 Cognitive Behavioural Therapy

Discussion

Norribrink-Budh et al. (2006) treated post-SCI pain patients with a pain management program consisting of education, behavioural therapy, relaxation therapy, exercises, and body awareness training.  This pre-post design study found no change in pain intensities or treatments with this approach.

In a prospective controlled trial, Perry et al. (2010) placed SCI individuals with chronic pain into either a multidisciplinary cognitive behavioural pain management program involving pharmacological and CBT treatment or in an usual care control group.  The study found significant improvement in both the MPI and SF-12 MCS scores in the treatment group compared to the control group post treatment. A trend towards improved pain intensity and HADS score was also seen in the treatment group post treatment; however, scores returned to pre-treatment scores by 9 month follow-up.

Conclusions

  • There is level 2 evidence that a cognitive behavioural pain management program with pharmacological treatment improves chronic pain post SCI over the short term.
  • There is level 2 evidence that cognitive-behavioural therapy alone does not change post-SCI pain intensity.
  • Cognitive behavioral therapy combined with pharmacological treatment results in short term improvement in chronic pain.
  • Cognitive-behavioral pain management programs alone do not alter post-SCI pain.

Visual Imagery

Visual imagery therapy is a cognitive technique which uses guided images to alter perceptions and modify behaviour.  It has been used in various studies to alleviate pain responses by changing feelings of perceived discomfort (Kazdin 2001; Korn 2002; Kwekkeboom 2001). It is based on a cortical model of pathological pain (Harris, 1999). This model states that the injury causes a mismatch between motor output and sensory feedback which in turn contributes to the pain. Studies have found normalization of the cortical proprioception representation results in recovery from pain (Floor, 2000; Maihofner et al. 2004; Pleger et al. 2005).

Table 11 Visual Imagery

Discussion

Moseley (2007) reported on five individuals with both a T12-L3 paraplegia (AIS B) and neuropathic pain who engaged in a virtual activity, where they were led through a guided walking exercise, visualizing that they were walking pain free. Of the four subjects who completed the trial (one patient withdrew from the study earlier due to distress), there was a mean 42 mm reduction in neuropathic pain following individual treatments, and 53 and 42 mm reductions  immediately and 3 months following virtual walking daily for 3 weeks based on a 100 mm visual analog scale. Control treatments were visual imagery alone, and watching a movie, both of which resulted in less dramatic pain reduction; however, no statistical comparisons were done

Conclusion

  • There is limited (Level 4) evidence, based on one pre-post study with small numbers, that visual imagery may reduce neuropathic pain post SCI.
  • Visual imagery may reduce neuropathic pain post SCI

Transcranial Electrical Stimulation Post SCI Pain

Transcranial Electrical Stimulation (TCES) treatment involves applying electrodes to an individual’s scalp to allow electrical current to be applied and presumably stimulate the underlying cerebrum (Tan et al. 2006).

Table 12 Transcranial Electrical Stimulation Post-SCI Pain

Discussion

Despite the fact that TCES is a relatively new treatment for post-SCI pain, 3 RCTs (Tan et al. 2006; Fregni et al. 2006; Capel et al. 2003) have been published, all suggesting it may be useful in reducing SCI-related chronic pain. Each of these investigations employed a sham stimulation control condition, using modified equipment. Although patients in all 3 studies reported some pain relief following treatment, there was no comment on how long the treatments should continue or how often they should be used.

Tan et al. (2006) conducted a double-blind RCT with 38 SCI participants with either chronic musculoskeletal or neuropathic pain receiving either active transcranial electrical stimulation (TCES) or inactive TCES (sham control) over 21 days. The electrical stimulation was set at a subthreshold level ensuring that patients were blind to their treatment group. The study found that SCI patients receiving transcranial electrotherapy stimulation (n=18) experienced a significant reduction in post-SCI neuropathic and musculoskeletal average daily rating of pain intensity (p=0.03); however, there was no significant reduction in pain as noted on the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI).

Capel et al. (2003) reported transcranial electrostimulation resulted in lower pain scores on the McGill Pain Questionnaire for those in the treatment group (n=15), while those in the control group (n=15) reported no change. No statistical differences were noted across different pain types, although the authors did comment that subjects had greater relief of visceral pain following each active 4-day treatment phase of the study. Transcranial electrostimulation was associated with a reduction in the use of analgesics and antidepressants.  

Fregni et al. (2006)found similar results after examining the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on central neuropathic pain. The treatment group (n=11), those receiving active tDCS for 5 consecutive days, experienced a significant reduction in pain relief over time (p<0.0001) compared to those receiving sham treatments (n=6)

Conclusion

  • Based on three level 1 studies, there is strong evidence, of the benefits of transcranial electrical stimulation in reducing post-SCI pain.
  • Transcranial electrical stimulation is effective in reducing post SCI neuropathic pain.

Static Magnetic Field Therapy Post SCI Pain

Table 13 Static Magnetic Field Therapy Post-SCI Pain

Discussion

Static Magnetic Field (SMF) therapy has been studied as a treatment for pain post SCI. Panagos et al. (2004) in a pre-post study involving 8 individuals, on average 12 years post injury, found that placing a static field magnet of 500 gauss over a self-identified ‘trigger point’ resulted in patients reporting less stabbing, sharp and tender pain (p<0.05); however, there was no significant change noted on a VAS pain severity scale.  These results are severely limited by the uncontrolled study design and relatively few study participants.

Conclusion

  • There is limited (Level 4) evidence that using a static field magnet helps to reduce reports of sharp, stabbing nociceptive shoulder pain but does not significantly reduce the VAS score of pain in individuals with a SCI.
  • Static field magnet may reduce nociceptive shoulder pain post SCI.

Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation Post SCI Pain

Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) is commonly used as an electroanalgesic and has been shown to be efficacious in the treatment of chronic musculoskeletal pain (Johnson et al. 2007). TENS is believed to preferentially stimulate large alpha sensory nerves and reduce pain at the presynaptic level in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord through nociceptive inhibition (Cheing et al. 1999).

Table 14 TENS in Post-SCI Pain

Discussion

Davis and Lentini (1975) reported on a series of patients (n=31) in whom transcutaneous nerve stimulation was applied to painful areas. Among those with a thoracic (n=11) or caudal level injury (n=16), only 36% reported that the treatment was successful in reducing pain at the injury site; meanwhile, none of those with a cervical injury (n=4) experienced any reduction in pain. In general, TENS was not deemed effective for radicular or below-level injury site pain.

Conclusion

  • There is limited (level 4) evidence that TENS reduced at-the-injury site pain in only a minority of patients with thoracic or cauda equina SCI, but not those with cervical SCI.
  • Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation may reduce pain at site of injury in patients with thoracic but not cervical injury.

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a noninvasive and relatively safe technology where electromagnetic currents in a coil produces magnetic pulses which crosses the cranium and induces neuron depolarization (Defrin et al. 2007). Magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex has been shown to attenuate post-stroke pain (Migita et al. 1995).

Table 15 Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Discussion

Defrin et al. (2007) studied transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and found both real and sham TMS stimulated treatments significantly reduced pain.  The real TMS treatment resulted in a much greater reduction in pain (and depression) scores at follow-up.

Conclusion

  • There is level 1 evidence that transcranial magnetic stimulation significantly reduced post-SCI pain significantly over the long-term.
  • Transcranial magnetic stimulation reduces post-SCI pain.

Pharmacological Management of Post-SCI Pain

Pharmacological interventions are the standard treatment for SCI pain.  The limited effectiveness of non-pharmacological treatments has contributed to increasing use of pharmacological interventions to deal with what is often very severe and disabling pain.

Pharmacological Measures Overall

Table 16 Pharmacological Interventions and Post-SCI Pain

Discussion

Widerstrom-Noga and Turk (2003),not unexpectedly, found that SCI patients with more severe pain, in more locations, those with allodynia or hyperalgesia, and those in whom the pain was more likely to interfere with activities were more likely to use pain medications.

Trials of simple non-narcotic analgesics, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), acetaminophen or non-narcotic “muscle relaxants” are common clinical practice in SCI pain.  Unfortunately, these medications are often ineffective in complete SCI neuropathic pain relief and have potential risks such as gastric ulceration with prolonged use. 

For neuropathic or “central” pain seen following SCI, psychotropic drugs such as antidepressants and anticonvulsants are reportedly the most effective (Donovan 1982).  Despite increasing popularity, few drugs (with the exception of Gabapentin and pregabalin) have regulatory approval for use in neuropathic pain and selection for individual patients is largely based on anecdotal evidence, of off-labelled use.

Anticonvulsants in SCI Pain

Anticonvulsant medications are often utilized in treating neurogenic or deafferent pain following SCI based on the theory that these drugs alter sodium conduction in uncontrolled hyperactive neurons (“convulsive environment”) in the spinal cord. Carbamazepine has been reported as being somewhat effective in the paroxysmal, sharp, shooting pain of trigeminal neuralgia (Swerdlow 1984).  Gibson and White (1971) described relief resulting from carbamazepine treatment in two cases of L2 and T8 SCI with intractable pain below the level of SCI.  A similar effect of Carbamazepine (200 mg 2 x daily in combination with Amitriptyline 50 mg 3 x daily) was reported in a complete C8 patient with dysesthesia below the level of the  injury (Sandford et al. 1992).  Again, controlled studies utilizing these drugs in SCI pain are lacking with the exception of gabapentin and pregabalin.

Gabapentin and pregabalin are now regarded as first-line treatments of neuropathic pain (Ahn et al. 2003; Moulin et al. 2007). Gabapentin and pregabalin have been recommended as first line treatments for neuropathic pain in Canadian and international guidelines (Gajraj 2007). The mechanism of action for Pregabalin and Gabapentin is through binding the alpha-2 delta receptors in the central nervous system. These receptors are present on the presynaptic nerve terminals. When bound by gabapentin or pregabalin they decrease the influx of calcium into the presynaptic terminal there by decreasing the release of excitatory neurotransmitters. Gabapentin and pregabalin appear to potentiate GABA effects centrally through enhancement of GABA synthesis and release.  Levendoglu et al. (2004) note that neuropathic pain is ultimately generated by excessive firing of pain-mediating nerve cells, insufficiently controlled by segmental and nonsequental inhibitory circuits.  Gabapentin and pregabalin work by increasing GABA and reducing the release of glutamate thereby suppressing the sensitivity of N-metyl-D-asparate (NMDA) receptor. This has been shown to reduce neuronal hyperexcitability recorded at the spinal dorsal horn near the level of injury (Ahn et al. 2003).  Gabapentin and pregabalin are relatively well tolerated with only a few transient side effects, lack of organ toxicity, and no evidence of significant interaction with other medications (Levendoghu et al. 2004, Gajraj 2007).

Table 17 Anticonvulsants for SCI Pain

Discussion

Gabapentin

To et al. (2002)studied the impact of gabapentin on pain in a case series of 44 SCI patients with neuropathic pain and reported a significant decrease (p<0.001) in visual analogue pain scale (VAS) in 76% of subjects. Tai et al. (2002) studied the impact of gabapentin for pain treatment in a small RCT of only 7 patients.  There was a significant reduction of “unpleasant feeling” with gabapentin vs. placebo (p=0.028) while “pain intensity” and “burning pain” only trended to significance (p=0.094 and 0.065, respectively) and no differences were detected for other pain descriptors such as “sharp”, “dull”, “cold”, “sensitive”, “itchy”, “deep”, “surface”.  Levendoglu et al. (2004) in a cross-over design of 20 paraplegics with neuropathic pain > 6 months found that Gabapentin was more effective (p<0.05) than placebo in reducing neuropathic pain.  Ahn et al. (2003) in a before and after trial found that Gabapentin was effective (p<0.05) in decreasing neuropathic pain which was refractory to conventional analgesics for SCI patients with pain < 6 months and > 6 months and that the impact was greater for those patients with pain < 6 months in the most recent pain group. Putzke et al. (2002) found that, among the 21 patients who answered their questionnaire, 67% (n=14) reported a reduction in pain while on gabapentin. 

Rintala et al (2007) was the only study to report Gabapentin to have no benefit over placebo in the treatment of pain in spinal cord injury. This study may have been complicated by the fact  that the placebo treatment was dimenhydramine and not a true inert placebo and the number of subjects was only twenty two.

Pregabalin

Pregabalinis an analogue of the neurotransmitter gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) with demonstrated analgesic, anxiolytic, and anticonvulsant activity.  It’s mechanism of action is similar to gabapentin, but it has a higher affinity for the alpha-2-delta receptor and has linear pharmacokenetics. Sidall et al (2006) published the results of a double blind randomized control  trial evaluating the use of flexible dose pregabalin in the treatment of neuropathic pain in spinal cord injury. A total of 137 subjects with central neuropathic pain post spinal cord injury participated. The primary outcome was the VAS pain scale and secondary outcomes included sleep interference and anxiety scales. Seventy patients were randomized to receive pregabalin and 67 patients received placebo. At the end of the trial the pregabalin treated patients had significantly more pain relief. The pregabalin treated subjects also reported significantly improved sleep and anxiety. Side effects were mild and transient and included dizziness, drowsiness and edema (similar to gabapentin).

In a RCT conducted by Vranken et al. (2007) patients in the treatment group received escalating doses of pregabalin (150-600 mg daily), while those in the control group received a placebo. Subjects in the treatment group reported a significant decrease in pain (p<0.01), along with improvements in the EQ-5D VAS and utility scores (p<0.01), as well as the Bodily Pain subscale of the SF-36 (p<0.05), relative to the control group.

Lamotrigine

Finnerup et al. in 2002 studies the effects of lamotrigine on post SCI pain. Although the overall result showed no difference between placebo and lamotrigine, there was a significant reduction in pain in the incomplete spinal cord group.

Levetiracetam

Finnerup et al. (2009) conducted a randomized, double blind, crossover trial of levetiracetam in SCI individuals with pain. Participants were placed in either the levetiracetam or placebo group for 5 weeks and then crossed over after a 1 week washout period. This study found no significant difference between the levetiracetam and the placebo treatment group in improving pain intensity (p=0.46).

Valproate

In a double-blind cross-over study (n=20), Drewes et al. (1994) examined the effects of a 3 week treatment course of valoproic acid on chronic central pain in individuals who had sustained a SCI. Overall, they found no significant differences between the control and treatment groups; however, there was a trend towards improvement in the treatment group.

Table 18 Summary of Anticonvulsant Pain Treatment Post SCI

Conclusion

  • There is level 1 evidence that the Gabapentin and pregabalin improve neuropathic pain post SCI.
  • There is level 4 evidence that the anticonvulsant Gabapentin is more effective when SCI pain is <6 months than >6 months.
  • There is level 2 evidence that lamotrigine improves neuropathic pain in incomplete spinal cord injury
  • Based on one Level 1 study, Levetiracetam is not effective in reducing neuropathic pain post SCI.
  • There is Level 1 evidence that valproic acid does not significantly relieve neuropathic pain post SCI.
  • Gabapentin and pregabalin improve neuropathic pain post SCI.
  • Lamotrigine may improve neuropathic pain in incomplete spinal cord injury
  • Levetiracetam is not effective in reducing neuropathic pain post SCI.
  • Valproic acid does not reduce neuropathic pain post SCI.

Tricyclic Antidepressants in Post-SCI pain

Tricyclic antidepressant drugs are thought to modulate pain by inhibiting the uptake of norepinephrine and serotonin in the CNS.  Sandford et al. (1992) have suggested that the tricyclic antidepressants exert an analgesic effect by making more serotonin available in the CNS, thereby potentiating the inhibitory action of the dorsal horn of the spinal cord.  Unfortunately, these medications are often sedating and produce a variety of anticholinergic side effects. 

The partial effectiveness of tricyclic antidepressants (TCA) in some SCI patients with dysesthetic pain suggests that this drug is simply affecting the pain by treating the depression.  Sandford et al. (1992) noted that pain and depression maybe chemically linked.  Depression can lower pain thresholds or pain tolerances thereby increasing the patient's experience of pain.  However Max et al. (1987) were able to show that tricyclic antidepressants (TCA) had analgesic properties despite low doses or short treatment cycles with analgesic activity occurring independent of mood changes.

Davidoff et al. (1987) reported trazodone's lack of effectiveness in relieving pain in 19 SCI patients with chronic dysesthetic pain, using a double-blind placebo controlled trial.  Trazodone reportedly selectively inhibits serotonin and norepinephrine uptake in a ratio of 25:1, and is thought to produce greater analgesia and less anticholinergic side-effects compared to non-selective agents such as amitriptyline. 

Table 19 Tricyclic Antidepressants in Post-SCI Pain 

Discussion

Tricyclic antidepressants are often recommended for the treatment of neuropathic pain following non-SCI causes.  Therefore, it is important to study the use of tricyclic antidepressants in the treatment of post-SCI pain.Cardenas et al. (2002) reported no significant difference in randomized spinal cord injury patients receiving either amitriptyline or placebo given 1-2 hours before bedtime for a period of 6 weeks.  Heilporn (1977) using combinations of melitracin and TENS reported relief of pain in 8 of 11 SCI patients with dysesthetic pain.  In an interesting study by Rintala et al. (2007), amitripyline was no better than gabapentin in depressed and nondepressed subjects but was better than diphenhydramine for depressed subjects only.

Davidoff et al. (1987), in a 6 week double-blind placebo-controlled trial, found that trazodone was ineffective at relieving pain in 18 SCI patients with chronic neuropathic pain

Conclusion

  • There is level 1 evidence that amitriptyline is effective in the treatment of post-SCI pain in depressed individuals.
  • There is Level 1 evidence that trazodone  does not reduce post-SCI neuropathic  pain.
  • Amitriptyline is effective in reducing pain in depressed SCI individuals.
  • Trazodone does not reduce post-SCI pain.

Anaesthetic Medications

Anaesthetic medication such as lidocaine and ketamine are sodium channel blockers and can be delivered by a number of routes.  Ketamine is a noncompetitive N-methyl-D-Aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist can be administered epidurally and intrathecally (and orally) to treat neuropathic pain syndromes (Hocking & Cousins 2003).

Table 20 Anaesthetic Medications for Post-SCI Pain

Discussion

Lidocaine

Given the severity of post-SCI pain, treatments such as lumbar epidural and subarachnoid infusions or anaesthetics are sometimes utilized and there is some evidence for these treatments.  Loubser and Donovan (1991) conducted an RCT of 21 patients who were provided 2 separate lumbar subarachnoid injections of placebo and 5% lidocaine in dextrose.  Following the lidocaine injection (n=13) there was a significant mean reduction in pain (p<0.01) for an average of 2 hours despite the fact that 8 patients showed no changes.   However, this treatment provided short-term relief of pain only.  The authors regarded the value of this treatment as more a diagnostic procedure than a therapeutic one. 

Attal et al. (2000)reported on 15 patients who received lidocaine intravenously and experienced a greater reduction in pain than those who received placebo, with an effect lasting up to 45 minutes post injection, and a reduction in the intensity of brush-induced allodynia and mechanical hyperalgesia. In a RCT study by Finnerup et al. (2005) those patients who received lidocaine intravenously (n=24) in two treatment sessions 6 days apart reported significantly less pain than those who did not receive intravenous lidocaine.

Kvarnstrom et al. 2004 found no evidence for the effectiveness of intravenous lidocaine in reducing neuropathic pain when compared to placebo.

Mexilitine

Chiou-Tan et al. (1996) provided 15 SCI individuals with either oral mexiletine (an orally administered derivative of lidocaine) or placebo (150mg 3 x daily) in a double-blind cross-over RCT.  There was no appreciable improvement in pain severity, as measured either on a VAS or using the McGill Pain Questionnaire, within either group.

Ketamine

In one RCT of 10 subjects, Kvarnstrom et al. (2004) found ketamine was successful in reducing spontaneous neuropathic pain post SCI.  Eideet al. (1995)in an RCT of intravenous ketamine hydrochloride (NMDA receptor antagonist), alfentanil (m-opioid receptor agonist) or placebo were provided as combination of bolus and continuous intravenous infusions.  There was a significant benefit to ketamine or alfentanil vs. placebo for allodynia.  Alfentanil reduced wind-up pain compared toplacebo but not ketamine overall; however, there was a high correlation between the serum concentration of ketamine and the reduction in continuous pain and wind-up pain.  The effects of ketamine and alfentanil were significant when compared to placebo.

Table 21 Summary of Anaesthetic Treatments Post SCI Pain

Conclusion

  • There is level 1 evidence (based on one RCT) that Lidocaine delivered through a subarachnoid lumbar catheter provides short-term relief of pain greater than placebo.
  • There is level 1 evidence (based on one RCT) that intravenous Ketamine significantly reduces allodynia when compared to placebo.
  • There is level 1 evidence (based on one RCT) that mexilitene (a derivative of lidocaine) does not improve SCI dysesthetic pain when compared to placebo.
  • Lidocaine through a subarachnoid lumbar catheter and intravenous Ketamine improve post-SCI pain short term.
  • Mexilitene does not improve SCI dysesthetic pain.

Antispasticity Medications

Herman et al. (1992) note that baclofen, an α-aminobutyric acid (GABA)B receptor agonist,acts to suppress spasticity in SCI patients centrally within the spinal cord itself.   GABA is known to be involved in several analgesics pathways (Savynok 1987) and experimentally induced allodynia has been shown to be suppressed by baclofen (Henry 1982).  However, baclofen, by treating spasticity, may reduce the musculoskeletal pain associated with spasticity. Continuous intrathecal infusion of baclofen can be effective, when oral baclofen is ineffective, in further reducing post-SCI spasticityand/or pain (dysesthetic, musculoskeletal, neurogenic) (Penn & Kroin 1987; Herman & D’Luzamsteg 1991; Boviatsis et al 2005; Plassat et al 2004).  For an in-depth discussion of intrathecal baclofen and it’s effects on spasticity in SCI, please refer to Spasticity chapter.

Table 22 Antispastic Medications for Post-SCI Pain

Discussion

Baclofen

Boviatsis et al (2005) and Plassat et al (2004) presented case series data that reflected improvements in self-reported pain ratings after intrathecal baclofen administration.  Herman et al. (1992)in a RCT found that intrathecal baclofen significantly suppressed the dysesthetic (burning) pain among 6 of the 7 subjects (p<0.001).  Only one of the placebo patients noted the dysesthetic pain was abolished.  Intrathecal baclofen did not have a significant impact on pinch induced pain.  Therefore, in this study, intrathecal baclofen appeared to have an impact on post-SCI dysesthetic pain in addition to treating the spasticity.  Loubser and Akman (1992) performed a before and after study of implanted Baclofen infusion pumps provided for spasticity.  Twelve (12) of 16 patients described pre-existing chronic pain but there was no significant difference in the VAS neurogenic pain symptoms at 6 and 12 months (p=0.26) while musculoskeletal pain symptoms and pain severity decreased in conjunction with control of spasticity in 5 of 6 patients. In this study, it appeared musculoskeletal pain was reduced more with intrathecal baclofen, presumably by reducing spasticity.

Hence it would appear that intrathecal baclofen improves chronic post-SCI pain but the actual mechanism has not been adequately established.  There is evidence that baclofen infusion pumps may be helpful for both neuropathic and musculoskeletal pain after SCI (Loubser et al. 1996). However, studies have shown that intrathecal baclofen only reduces SCI pain when pain is related to muscle spasms (Coffee et al. 1993; Meythaler et al 1992).  Suppression of central pain through baclofen antagonism of substance P has been postulated (Herman et al 1992)

Motor Point Phenol Block

In a case series, Uchikawa et al. 2009 followed 7 spinal cord injury individuals with spastic shoulder pain underwent a motor point phenol block procedure.  A significant improvement in VAS shoulder pain was seen post injection (p<0.05).

Botulinum Toxin

Marciniak et al. (2008) treated 29 SCI patients with Botulinum toxin type A injections to treat focal spasticity.  Pain was improved by 83.3%.

Conclusion

  • There is level 1 evidence (based on one RCT) that Intrathecal Baclofen reduces dysesthetic pain post-SCI.  However, the sample size was small and a before and after trial reported contradictory results.
  • There is level 4 evidence that Intrathecal Baclofen reduces musculoskeletal pain post-SCI in conjunction with spasticity reduction.
  • There is level 4 evidence that motor point phenol block is effective in reducing short term spastic shoulder pain post SCI.
  • There is level 4 evidence that local botulinum toxin injections to treat focal spasticity reduces pain.
  • Intrathecal Baclofen improves musculoskeletal pain post SCI and may help dysethetic pain related to spasticity.
  • Motor point phenol block reduces spastic shoulder pain.
  • Botulinum toxin injections for focal spasticity improves pain.

Opioids for Post-SCI Pain

To date there are few research studies examining opioids in the treatment of SCI pain.  There is a substantial body of research investigating the benefits of opioid analgesics in the treatment of non-cancer chronic pain and some of those studies examined the impact of opioids on neuropathic pain. There are no studies employing opioid analgesics in post-SCI pain.  Furton et al (2006) conducted a meta-analysis of effectiveness and side-effects of opioid analgesics for chronic non-cancer pain.  Their meta-analysis found that opioids reduced pain and improved functional outcomes when compared to placebo for both nociceptive and neuropathic pain syndromes.  Strong opioids (oxydone and morphine) were significantly superior to naproxen and nortriptyline for pain relief but not functional outcomes.  Weak opioids (propylene, tramadol and codeine) did not significantly do better than NSAIDS or tricyclic anti-depressants for either pain relief or functional outcomes (Furton et al. 2006).  The same authors found that clinically, only constipation and nausea were significantly more common with opioids (Furher et al 2006).  The big concern with opioids is of course addiction or opioid abuse.  Unfortunately, as Furton et al. (2006) notes in their meta-analysis, the existing randomized trials were not designed to evaluate addiction.

Table 23 Opioids for Post-SCI Pain

Discussion

Attal et al. (2002) found the intravenous morphine titrated to maximal tolerated dosage, significantly reduced dynamic mechanical allodynia but not necessarily spontaneous or burning pains.  Oral opioids remain untested in this population.

Norrbrink and Lundeberg (2009) conducted a double-blind RCT to assess the efficacy of tramadol in 35 SCI individuals diagnosed with at- or below- level neuropathic pain. The authors reported significant differences between the two group pain ratings (p<0.05). Tramadol was also found to be effective in improving anxiety, global life satisfaction and sleep quality in individuals with post SCI pain (p<0.05). However, no significant improvement was seen in pain unpleasantness and depression levels.

Eide et al. 1995 randomly assigned individuals with chronic SCI pain into three groups receiving ketamine hydrochloride, alfentanil (m-opioid receptor agonist)or placebo treatment. The study found alfentanil and ketamine effectively reduced SCI pain compared to placebo treatment (p<0.04, p<0.01); however no difference was seen between the two treatments in overall pain. Alfentanil significantly reduced wind up like pain while ketamine did not.

Conclusion

  • There is level 1 evidence that intravenous morphine significantly reduces mechanical allodynia more than placebo.
  • There is level 1 evidence that tramadol is effective in reducing neuropathic pain post SCI.
  • There is level 1 evidence that alfentanil reduces overall post SCI pain.
  • There is level 1 evidence that alfentanil is more effective at reducing wind up like pain than ketamine.
  • Intravenous morphine reduces mechanical allodynia.
  • Tramadol reduces neuropathic pain.
  • Alfentanil reduces chronic pain post SCI.
  • Alfentanil is more effective in reducing wind up like pain post SCI than ketamine.

Cannabinoids in Post-SCI Pain

Wade et al. (2003) note that delta-9-tetra hydrocannabinol (THC) and other cannabinoids have been shown to improve both tremor and spasticity in animal models of multiple sclerosis supported by anecdotal reports that cannabis relieves some of the troublesome symptoms of multiple sclerosis and spinal cord injury (Dunn & Davis 1974; Petro & Ellenberger 1981; Ungeleider et al. 1987; Meinck et al. 1989; Martyn et al. 1995; Consroe et al. 1997; Baker 2000). There is a clinical impression that marijuana smoking is very common among patients post-SCI; however, there are social and legal implication to its use and medical concerns about smoking as a delivery system.

Table 22 Cannabinoids and Post-SCI Pain

Discussion

Hagenbach et al. (2007) conducted a study examining primarily the effectiveness of THC in improving spasticity and secondarily, in improving pain with SCI individuals. In the first phase of the study, 22 individuals received 10mg of oral THC which was then dose titrated until maximum tolerance or treatment dose was reached for 6 weeks. The study found a significant reduction in the pain of SCI individuals post treatment (p=0.047). The third phase of the study involved a double blind randomized control trial which included 13 of the previously mentioned individuals receiving either individual maximum treatment dosage previously determined or a placebo dose. In this phase, Hagenbach et al. (2007), found individuals in the treatment group had no significant pain reduction compared to those in the placebo group.

Given that marijuana has anecdotally been thought to have benefits for post-SCI pain, Wade et al. (2003) conducted an RCT of sublingual 2.5 mg tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and/or cannabidiol and found that it helped to reduce pain, muscle spasm, spasticity and sleep in a group of largely multiple sclerosis patients with neuropathic pain.  It is of note that only a small percentage of the patients in this study had spinal cord injuries hence did not meet inclusion criteria.  Cannabinoids are a promising treatment, which would benefit from other studies.

Conclusion

  • There is conflicting evidence for the use of THC in reducing spastic pain in SCI individuals.
  • Cannabinoids are a potential new treatment for post-SCI pain in need of further study.

Clonidine for Post-SCI Pain

Clonidine is an alpha-2 adrenoceptor agonist which has been shown to activate spinal receptors that reduce responses to painful stimuli (Yaksh 1985).  Ackerman et al. (2003) note that clonidine inhibits nociceptive impulses by activating alpha-2 adrencoceptors in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord (Rainov et al. 2001).  The anti-nociceptive effects of clonidine are thought to be mediated via inhibitory interaction with pre- and post-synaptic primary afferent nociceptive projections in the dorsal horn (Osenbach and Harvey 2001) and possibly by inhibition of substance P release (Hassenbusch et al. 1999; Ackerman et al. 2003).  Ackerman et al. (2003) noted selective alpha-2 adrenergic antagonists (e.g. Yohimbine) have been shown to reverse clonidine-induced analgesia (Osenbach & Harvey 2001).  Teasell and Arnold (2004) were able to show that venous alpha-adrenoceptor hyperresponsiveness was present in patients with RSD, in diabetic peripheral neuropathy (Arnold et al. 1993) and below the level of lesion in quadriplegics (Arnold et al. 1995).  They speculated that this alpha-adrenoceptor hyperresponsiveness was in fact due to alpha-2 adrenoceptor dysfunction leading to overstimulation of the post-synaptic alpha-1 adrenoceptor peripherally. This would fit with the observation that clonidine reduces pain post-SCI below the level of the lesion, presumably through its alpha-2 adrenoceptor agonist function.

Ackerman et al. (2002) noted that clonidine may be useful for patients who are non-responsive to opioids.  Clonidine appears to work synergistically with opioids to provide pain relief (Plummer et al. 1992; Tollerida et al. 1999; Siddall et al. 2000; Osenbach & Harvey 2001)

Table 23 Clonidine for Treatment of SCI Pain

Discussion

Siddall et al. (2000) in a RCT/cross over trial of 20 subjects with post-SCI neuropathic pain.  Intrathecal morphine clonidine or placebo was given at the lumbar level.  Once the subject received satisfactory pain relief or drug side effects they were given a mixture of clonidine and morphine.  Morphine or clonidine showed a trend in pain reduction, which was not statistically significant but when the combination of morphine and clonidine was administered there, was a significant reduction in pain.  Siddall et al. (2000) did postulate that by administering half the effective minimum dose of clonidine and morphine together resulted in a synergistic addictive effect above the simple summing up of each drug in isolation.  Uhle et al. (2000) in a study of study 10 patients were given morphine followed by clonidine via a medical pump.  Patients when given clonidine experienced a good to excellent reduction in their pain.

Conclusion

  • There is level 1 evidence (based on only one RCT) that Intrathecal Clonidine alone did not provide pain relief greater than placebo, although there was a trend.
  • There is level 2 evidence (based on one prospective controlled study) that the combination of Intrathecal Morphine and Clonidine did provide pain relief greater than placebo.
  • Intrathecal Clonidine alone does not appear to provide pain relief although it may be helpful in combination with Intrathecal Morphine.

Topical Capsaicin

Capsaicin is an active alkaloid in hot peppers.  It has been successfully used to reduce pain in herpes zoster, diabetic neuropathy and post-mastectomy pain syndrome (Sandford & Benes 2000).  It works as an inhibitor of substance P.

Table 24 Topical Capsaicin in Post-SCI Pain

Discussion

Topical capsaicin was used to treat radicular post-SCI pain for 1-2 weeks (Sandford & Benes 2000).  Patients showed improvement in pain and 2 of the 8 patients were still improved for over 2 years.

Conclusion

  • There is level 4 evidence that topical capsaicin reduces post-SCI radicular pain.
  • Topical capsaicin reduces post-SCI radicular pain.

Surgical Interventions


Spinal Cord Stimulation

Spinal cord stimulation has been used to try to treat intractable pain. The procedure is both expensive and invasive.

Table 25 Spinal Cord Stimulation Post SCI

Cioni et al. (1995)in a case series reported inserting epidural electrodes percutaneously over the posterior columns of the spinal cord to allow for spinal cord stimulation.  During spinal cord stimulation, 22 patients reported parasthesias overlapping the painful area.  9 patients reported 50% pain relief and 3 patients experienced no pain relief.

Conclusion

  • There is level 4 evidence that spinal cord stimulation improves post-SCI pain.
  • Spinal cord stimulation may improve post-SCI pain.

Dorsal Longitudinal T-Myelotomy for Pain Management Post-SCI

Table 26 Dorsal Longitudinal T-Myelotomy Post-SCI Pain

Discussion

Livshits et al. (2002) conducted a case control study comparing two approaches of dorsal longitudinal T-myelotomy (i.e., Pourpre vs. Bischof II) with respect to their effectiveness in reducing pain and spasticity in people with SCI, initially refractory to more conservative approaches (N=40).  Systematic follow-up assessments at 6 months, 5 and 10 years were conducted. In this study, significant pain reduction was obtained with either of these surgical techniques, as measured using scores obtained from the Short Form – McGill Pain Questionnaire, the Present Pain Intensity scale, and a visual analog scale, but this appeared to be more notable with the Pourpre versus the Bischof II procedure.

Conclusion

  • There is level evidence to support the use of dorsal longitudinal T-myelotomy procedures, in particular Pourpre’s technique, to reduce spastic pain post SCI.
  • Dorsal longitudinal T-myelotomy procedures reduce pain post SCI.

Dorsal Rhizotomy

Dorsal rhizotomy is a procedure where the sensory roots are divided either intradurally or extradurally.  According to Nashold (1991) a single one or two level root rhizotomy may be appropriate when the pain is localized as in those patients with paraparesis and single root pain.  Moreover, Nashold (1991) reported the Dorsal Root Entry Zone (DREZ) procedure was more likely to be successful in these patients.

Table 27 Dorsal Root Entry Zone Procedure Post-SCI Pain

Discussion

Notably, Nashold et al. (1990) reported 14 of 18 individuals (77%) with paraplegia who underwent cyst drainage and the DREZ surgical procedure reported pain relief following surgery. In general, approximately 50% or more of the patients across these case series achieved greater than 50% pain relief or experienced no pain-related activity limitations and no need for narcotics following the surgery (Nashold et al. 1990; Sintou et al. 2001; Sampson et al. 1995; Friedman & Nashold. 1986; Spaic et al. 2002; Spaic et al. 1999; Sindou Rath et al. 1997).  However, all of these were retrospective, uncontrolled reports with obvious methodological limitations, such as ill-defined eligibility criteria (i.e., potential selection bias) and inadequate outcome measurement which limits the generalizability of the results.

Conclusion

  • There is limited (Level 4) evidence to support the use of the DREZ surgical procedure to reduce pain post SCI. It may be that some populations (segmental pain) are more likely to benefit from this procedure.
  • DREZ surgical procedure reduces pain post SCI.

Sympathectomy

Sympathectomy is not recommended for pain following SCI (Nashold 1991).  As mentioned previously, sympathetic blockade and sympathectomy have reportedly failed to relieve the central pain of SCI (White 1969; Melzack 1978; Friedman 1986).

Lateral Spinothalamic Tractotomy

Hazouri and Mueller (1950) described three selected cases of patients with intractable root pain, subsequent to severe trauma to the cauda equina which resulted in paraplegia (L2-4 lesions).  All three patients demonstrated a distinct increase in the threshold for perception of pain and "an even more remarkable increase in the threshold for reaction to pain."  Lateral spinothalamic tractotomy in all three of these patients resulted in complete relief from pain.  Threshold studies subsequent to the tractotomy "revealed a striking return of perception and reaction thresholds to a normal range."

Spinal Cordotomy

This procedure can be performed openly or percutaneously.  Anterior spinothalamic tracts subserving pain and temperature function are sectioned, often requiring a bilateral approach.  Spinal cordotomy is an option but is rarely employed and there is little evidence that it works.

Summary

Pain following SCI is quite common. The most common type of pain post SCI is central or neuropathic in nature characterized by a dysesthetic, burning pain below the level of SCI. Borderzone or segmental pain is much less common; occurring along the border between normal and absent sensation. The precise etiology of central/neuropathic or borderzone segmental pain is not known. There is some evidence suggesting an association may exist between the central or neuropathic dysesthetic burning pain and abnormalities of the sympathetic nervous system. Musculoskeletal pain, either secondary to the original trauma or to overuse is both common and well understood. Unfortunately, the management of central or neuropathic pain remains difficult and largely ineffective.

  • For many SCI patients pain has a significant impact on quality of life.
  • Over 50% of SCI patients develop chronic pain.  Severe pain is more common the lower down the lesion in the spinal cord. Pain post-SCI most often begins within the first 6-12 months post-SCI. 
  • The most common types of pain post SCI are: 1) is a burning pain (likely neuropathic) usually localized to the front of torso, buttock or legs; 2) an aching pain (likely musculoskeletal) usually localized to the neck, shoulders and back.
  • There is limited level 4 evidence that massage and heat are the best non-pharmacological treatments for pain post SCI.
  • There is level 1 evidence that in general acupuncture is no more effective than Trager therapy or sham acupuncture in reducing nociceptive musculoskeletal shoulder pain post SCI.
  • There is level 4 evidence that acupuncture and electroacupuncture reduces neuropathic pain of patients with SCI.
  • There is level 1 evidence that a regular exercise program significantly reduces post-SCI pain.
  • There is level 2 evidence (from one RCT and one PCT) that a shoulder exercise protocol reduces the intensity of shoulder pain post SCI.
  • There is level 4 evidence that the MAGIC wheels 2-gear wheelchair results in less shoulder pain.
  • There is level 4 evidence that hypnosis reduces pain intensity post SCI.
  • There is level 2 evidence that a cognitive behavioural pain management program with pharmacological treatment improves chronic pain post SCI over the short term.
  • There is level 2 evidence that cognitive-behavioural therapy alone does not change post-SCI pain intensity.
  • There is limited (Level 4) evidence, based on one pre-post study with small numbers, that visual imagery may reduce neuropathic pain post SCI.
  • Based on three level 1 studies, there is strong evidence, of the benefits of transcranial electrical stimulation in reducing post-SCI pain.
  • There is limited (Level 4) evidence that using a static field magnet helps to reduce reports of sharp, stabbing nociceptive shoulder pain but does not significantly reduce the VAS score of pain in individuals with a SCI.
  • There is limited (level 4) evidence that TENS reduced at-the-injury site pain in only a minority of patients with thoracic or cauda equina SCI, but not those with cervical SCI.
  • There is level 1 evidence that transcranial magnetic stimulation significantly reduced post-SCI pain significantly over the long-term.
  • There is level 1 evidence that Gabapentin and pregabalin improve neuropathic pain post SCI. 
  • There is level 4 evidence that the anticonvulsant Gabapentin is more effective when SCI pain is <6 mos than >6 mos.
  • There is level 2 evidence that lamotrigine improves neuropathic pain in patients with incomplete SCI.
  • Based on one Level 1 study, Levetiracetam is not effective in reducing neuropathic pain post SCI.
  • There is Level 1 evidence that valproic acid does not significantly relieve neuropathic pain post SCI.
  • There is level 1 evidence that amitriptyline is effective in the treatment of post-SCI pain in depressed individuals.
  • There is Level 1 evidence that trazodone does not reduce post-SCI neuropathic  pain.
  • There is level 1 evidence (based on one RCT) that Lidocaine delivered through a subarachnoid lumbar catheter provides short-term relief of pain greater than placebo.
  • There is level 1 evidence (based on one RCT) that intravenous Ketamine significantly reduces allodynia when compared to placebo.
  • There is level 1 evidence (based on one RCT) that mexilitene (a derivative of lidocaine) does not improve SCI dysesthetic pain when compared to placebo.
  • There is level 1 evidence (based on one RCT) that Intrathecal Baclofen reduces dysesthetic pain post SCI.  However, the sample size was small and a before and after trial reported contradictory results.
  • There is level 4 evidence that Intrathecal Baclofen reduces musculoskeletal pain post-SCI by reducing spasticity.
  • There is level 4 evidence that motor point phenol block is effective in reducing short term spastic shoulder pain post SCI.
  • There is level 4 evidence that local botulinum toxin injections to treat focal spasticity reduces pain.
  • There is level 1 evidence that intravenous morphine significantly reduces mechanical allodynia more than placebo.
  • There is level 1 evidence that tramadol is effective in reducing neuropathic pain post SCI.
  • There is level 1 evidence that alfentanil reduces overall post SCI pain.
  • There is level 1 evidence that alfentanil is more effective at reducing wind up like pain than ketamine.
  • There is conflicting evidence for the use of THC in reducing spastic pain in SCI individuals.
  • There is level 1 evidence (based on only one RCT) that Intrathecal Clonidine alone did not provide pain relief greater than placebo, although there was a trend.
  • There is level 2 evidence (based on only one prospective controlled study) that the combination of Intrathecal Morphine and Clonidine did provide pain relief greater than placebo.
  • There is level 4 evidence that topical capsaicin reduces post-SCI radicular pain.
  • There is level 4 evidence that spinal cord stimulation improves post-SCI pain.
  • There is level evidence to support the use of dorsal longitudinal T-myelotomy procedures, in particular Pourpre’s technique, to reduce spastic pain post SCI.
  • There is limited (Level 4) evidence to support the use of the DREZ surgical procedure to reduce pain post SCI. It may be that some populations (segmental pain) are more likely to benefit from this procedure.

Key Points

  • Pain post SCI has a significant effect on quality of life.
  • Post-SCI pain is common and often severe beginning relatively early post injury.
  • Post-SCI pain is most commonly divided into neuropathic or musculoskeletal pain.
  • Massage and heat may be helpful for post-SCI pain.
  • Acupuncture may reduce post-SCI pain.
  • Regular exercise reduces post-SCI pain.
  • A shoulder exercise protocol reduces post-SCI shoulder pain intensity.
  • MAGIC wheels 2 gear wheelchair reduces shoulder pain.
  • Hypnosis may reduce pain intensity post SCI.
  • Transcranial magnetic stimulation reduces post-SCI pain.
  • Cognitive behavioral therapy combined with pharmacological treatment results in short term improvement in chronic pain.
  • Cognitive-behavioral pain management programs alone do not alter post-SCI pain.
  • Visual imagery may reduce neuropathic pain post SCI
  • Transcranial electrical stimulation is effective in reducing post-SCI neuropathic pain.
  • Static field magnet may reduce nociceptive shoulder pain post SCI.
  • Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation may reduce pain at site of injury in patients with thoracic but not cervical injury.
  • Transcranial magnetic stimulation reduces post-SCI pain.
  • Gabapentin and pregabalin improve neuropathic pain post SCI.
  • Lamotrigine may improve neuropathic pain in patients with incomplete SCI.
  • Levetiracetam is not effective in reducing neuropathic pain post SCI.
  • Valproic acid does not reduce neuropathic pain post SCI.
  • Amitriptyline is effective in reducing pain in depressed SCI individuals.
  • Trazodone does not reduce post-SCI pain.
  • Lidocaine through a subarachnoid lumbar catheter and intravenous Ketamine improve post SCI pain short term.
  • Mexilitene does not improve SCI dysesthetic pain.
  • Intrathecal Baclofen improves musculoskeletal pain post SCI and may help dysethetic pain related to spasticity.
  • Motor point phenol block reduces spastic shoulder pain.
  • Botulinum toxin injections for treatment of focal spasticity improves pain.
  • Intravenous morphine reduces mechanical allodynia.
  • Tramadol reduces neuropathic pain.
  • Alfentanil reduces chronic pain post SCI.
  • Alfentanil is more effective in reducing wind up like pain post SCI than ketamine.
  • Cannabinoids are a potential new treatment for post-SCI pain in need of further study.
  • Intrathecal Clonidine alone does not provide pain relief although it may be helpful in combination with Intrathecal Morphine.
  • Topical capsaicin reduces post-SCI radicular pain.
  • Spinal cord stimulation may improve post-SCI pain.
  • Dorsal longitudinal T-myelotomy procedures reduce pain post SCI.
  • DREZ surgical procedure reduces pain post SCI.

References

  • Ackerman LL, Follett KA, Rosenquist RW.  Long-term outcomes during treatment of chronic pain with intrathecal clonidine or clonidine/opioid combinations. J Pain Symptom Management 2003;26:668-77.
  • Ahn SH, Park HW, Lee BS, Moon HW, Jang SH, Sakong J et al. Gabapentin effect on neuropathic pain compared among patients with spinal cord injury and different durations of symptoms. Spine 2003;28:341-346.
  • Aisen PS, Aisen ML.  Shoulder-hand syndrome in cervical spinal cord injury.  Paraplegia 1994;32:588-592.
  • Andrews LG, Armitage KJ. Sudek's atrophy in traumatic quadriplegia.  Paraplegia 1971;9:159-165.
  • Arner S, Meyerson BA.  Lack of analgesic effect of opioids on neuropathic and idiopathic forms of pain. Pain 1988;33:11-23.
  • Arner S. Intravenous phentolamine test: diagnostic and prognostic use in reflex sympathetic dystrophy.   Pain 1991;46:17-22.
  • Arnold JMO, Teasell RW, MacLeod AP, Brown JE, Carruthers SG. Increased venous alpha-adrenoceptor responsiveness in patients with reflex sympathetic dystrophy. Ann Int Med 1993;118:619-621.
  • Arnold JMO, Feng QP, Delaney GA, Teasell RW. Autonomic dysreflexia in tetraplegic patients: evidence for alpha-adrenoceptor hyper-responsiveness. Clinical Auton Research 1995;5:267-70.
  • Arrowood JA, Mohanty PK, Thames MD. Cardiovascular problems in the spinal cord injured patient.  In: Ozer MN, Schmitt JK.  Medical Complications of Spinal Cord Injury. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation: State of the Art Reviews, Hanley & Belfus, Philadelphia PA, 1987;1:443-456.
  • Attal N, Gaude V, Brasseur L, Dupuy M, Guirimand F, Parker F et al. Intravenous lidocaine in central pain: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, psychophysical study. Neurology 2000;54(3):564-574.
  • Attal N, Guirimand F, Brasseur L, Gaude V, Chauvin M, Bouhassira D. Effects of IV morphine in central pain: a randomized placebo-controlled study. Neurology 2002;58:554-563.
  • Baker D, Pryce G, Crozford JD et al. Canninoids control spasticity and tremor in multiple sclerosis model. Nature 2000;404:84-87.
  • Banerjee T.  Transcutaneous nerve stimulation for pain after spinal cord injury.  New Engl J Med 1974;10:796.
  • Bej MD, Schwartzman RJ.  Abnormalities of cutaneous blood flow regulation in patients with reflex sympathetic dystrophy as measured by laser doppler fluxmetry. Arch Neurol 1991;48:912-915.
  • Bennett MI, Attal N, Backonja MM, Baron R, Bouhassira D, Freynhagen R, Scholz J, Tolle TR, Wittchen HU, Jensen TS.  Using screening tools to identify neuropathic pain.  Pain 2007;127:199-203.
  • Beric A, Dimitrijevic MR, Lindbloom U.  Central dysesthesia syndrome in spinal cord injury patients. Pain 1988;34:109-116.
  • Beric A.  Post-spinal cord injury pain states. Pain 1997;72:295-298.
  • Blumberg H, Griesser HJ.  Zur pathophysiologic sympathisch unlerhaltener. Schmerzzustunde Der Schnerz 1987;1:62.
  • Bonica JJ. (1991) Introduction: semantic, epidemiologic and educational issues. In: Casey KL, editor. Pain and Central Nervous System Disease: the Central Pain Syndromes. New York: Raven Press, 13-29.
  • Bors E.  Phantom limbs of patients with spinal cord injury. AMA Arch Neurol Psych 1951;66:610-631.
  • Botterell EH, Callaghan JC, Jousee AT. Pain in paraplegia: clinical management and surgical treatment.       Proc Roy Soc Med 1953;47:281-299.
  • Bowsher D.  Central pain: clinical and physiological characteristics. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1996;61:62-69.
  • Breeman WA, de JM, Kwekkeboom DJ, Valkema R, Bakker WH, Kooij PP et al. Somatostatin receptor-mediated imaging and therapy: basic science, current knowledge, limitations and future perspectives. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2001;28(9):1421-1429.
  • Britell CW, Mariano AJ.  Chronic pain in spinal cord injury. In Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation: State of the Art Reviews 1991;5:71-82.
  • Britell CW, Umlauf R, Loehr J, DeLisa JA. Problem survey in an SCI outpatient clinic population: a case of multifaceted, ongoing care. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1989;67:654.
  • Budh CN, Hultling C, Molander C, Werhagen L. Neuropathic pain after traumatic spinal cord injury--relations to gender, spinal level, completeness, and age at the time of injury. Spinal Cord 2004;42(12):665-673.
  • Burchiel KJ, Hsu FP. Pain and spasticity after spinal cord injury: mechanisms and treatment. Spine 2001;26(24 Suppl):S146-S160.
  • Burke DC, Woodward JM.  Pain and phantom sensations in spinal paralysis. In Vinken PJ, Bruyn GW    (eds).  Handbook of Clinical Neurology.  Amsterdam, North Holland Publishing Co, 1976, p. 489-499.
  • Burke DC. Pain in paraplegia. Paraplegia 1973;10:297-313.
  • Burney RE, Maio RF, Maynard F, Karunas R. Incidence, characteristics, and outcome of spinal cord injury at trauma centers in North America. Arch Sung 1992;128:596-599.
  • Burnham RS et al. Shoulder pain in wheelchair athletes: the role of muscle imbalance. Am J Sports Med 1993;21:238-242.
  • Cairns DM, Adkins DH, Scott MD. Pain and depression in acute traumatic spinal cord injury: origins of chronic problematic pain. Arch Phys Med Rehab 1996;77:329-335.
  • Campbell JN, Meyer RA, Raja SN. Is nociceptor activation by alpha-1 adrenoceptors the culprit in sympathetically maintained pain. Am Pain Soc J 1992;91:3-11.
  • Capel ID, Dorrell HM, Spencer EP, Davis MW. The amelioration of the suffering associated with spinal cord injury with subperception transcranial electrical stimulation. Spinal Cord 2003;41(2):109-117.
  • Cardenas DD, Warms CA, Turner JA, Marshall H, Brooke MM, Loeser JD. Efficacy of amitriptyline for relief of pain in spinal cord injury: results of a randomized controlled trial. Pain 2002;96:365-373.
  • Cheing GL, Hui-Chan CW. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation: nonparallel antinociceptive effects on chronic clinical pain and acute experimental pain. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 1999;80(3):305-312.
  • Chiou-Tan FY, Tuel SM, Johnson JC, Priebe MM, Hirsh DD, Strayer JR. Effect of mexiletine on spinal cord injury dysesthetic pain. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1996;75(2):84-87.
  • Christensen K, Henriksen O. The reflex sympathetic dystrophy syndrome. An experimental study of sympathetic reflex control of subcutaneous blood flow in the hand. Scan J Rheumatol 1983;12:263-267.
  • Cioni B, Meglio M, Pentimalli L, Visocchi M. Spinal cord stimulation in the treatment of paraplegic pain. J Neurosurg 1995;82:35-39.
  • Claus Walker J, Halstead LS. Metabolic and endocrine changes in spinal cord injury: Consequences of partial decentralization of autonomic nervous system. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1982;63:569-575.
  • Claus Walker J, Vallbona C, Carter Re, Lipscomb HS. Resting and stimulated endocrine function in human subjects with cervical spinal cord transection. J Chronic Dis 1971;24:193-207.
  • Cohen MJ, McArthur DL, Vulpe M, Schandler SI, Gerber KE. Comparing chronic pain from spinal cord injury to chronic pain of other origins. Pain 1988;35:57-63.
  • Consroe P, Musty R, Rein J, Tillery W, Pertwee R. The perceived effects of smoked cannabis on patients with multiple sclerosis. European Neurology 1997;38(1):44-48.
  • Cremer SA, Maynard F, Davidoff G. The reflex sympathetic dystrophy syndrome associated with traumatic myelopathy.  Pain 1989;37:187-192.
  • Curtis KA, Tyner TM, Zachary L, Lentell G, Brink D, Didyk T et al. Effect of a standard exercise protocol on shoulder pain in long-term wheelchair users. Spinal Cord1999;37(6):421-429.
  • Cyriax J. Textbook of Orthopedic Medicine, ed. 5. Balliere, Tindall and Casell 1969.
  • Davidoff G, Roth E, Guarracini M, Sliwa J, Yarkony G.  Functional-limiting dysesthetic pain syndrome among traumatic spinal cord injury patients: a cross-sectional study.  Pain 1987;29:39-48.
  • Davidoff G, Guarrancini M, Roth E, Sliewa J, Yarkony G.  Trazodone hydrochloride in the treatment of dysesthetic pain in traumatic myelopathy: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.  Pain 1987;29:151-161.
  • Davis L, Martin J.  Studies upon spinal cord injuries: the nature and treatment of pain.  J Neurosurg 1947;4:483-491.
  • Davis R.  Pain and suffering following spinal cord injury.  Clin Orthop 1975;112:76-80.
  • Davis R, Lentini R.  Transcutaneous nerve stimulation for treatment of pain in patients with spinal cord injury.  Surg Neurol 1975;4:100-101.
  • Dalyan M, Cardenas DD, Gerard B. Upper extremity pain after spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 1999;37(3):191-195.
  • Davis SE, Mulcahey MJ, Smith BT, Betz RR. Self-reported use of an implanted FES hand system by adolescents with tetraplegia. Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine 1998;21(3):220-226.
  • DeBarge O, Christensen NJ, Corbett JL, Eidelman BH, Frankel HL, Mathias CJ.  Plasma catecholamines in tetraplegics.  Paraplegia 1978;12:44-49.
  • Defrin R, Grunhaus L, Zamir D, Zeilig G. The effect of a series of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulations of the motor cortex on central pain after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007;88(12):1574-1580.
  • Delaney GA, Arnold JMO, Feng Q.  Increased alpha adrenoceptor responsiveness of superficial dorsal foot veins to noradrenaline in patients with quadriplegia (abstract).  Clinical and Investigative Medicine 1993;16(4):B110.
  • Dew MA, Lynch KA, Ernst J, Rosenthal R, Judd CM.  A causal analysis of factors affecting adjustment to spinal cord injury.  Rehab Psychol 1985;30:39-46.
  • Ditor DS, Latimer AE, Ginis KA, Arbour KP, McCartney N, Hicks AL. Maintenance of exercise participation in individuals with spinal cord injury: effects on quality of life, stress and pain. Spinal Cord 2003;41(8):446-450.
  • Donovan WH, Dimitrijevic MR, Dahm L, Dimitrijevic M.  Neurophysiological approaches to chronic pain following spinal cord injury.  Paraplegia 1982;20:135-146.
  • Drewes AM, Andreasen A, Poulsen LH. Valproate for treatment of chronic central pain after spinal cord injury. A double-blind cross-over study. Paraplegia 1994;32(8):565-569.
  • Drummond PD, Finch PM, Smythe GA.  Reflex sympathetic dystrophy: the significance of differing plasma catecholamine concentrations in affected and unaffected limbs.  Brain 1991;114:2025-2036.
  • Dunn M, Davis R. The perceived effects of marijuana on spinal cord injured males. Paraplegia 1974;12:175.
  • Dyson-Hudson TA, Kadar P, LaFountaine M, Emmons R, Kirshblum SC, Tulsky D et al. Acupuncture for chronic shoulder pain in persons with spinal cord injury: a small-scale clinical trial. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 2007;88(10):1276-1283.
  • Dyson-Hudson TA, Shiflett SC, Kirshblum SC, Bowen JE, Druin EL. Acupuncture and trager psychophysical integration in the treatment of wheelchair user's shoulder pain in individuals with spinal cord injury. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 2001;82(8):1038-1046.
  • Eide PK, Stubhaug A, Stenehjem AE.  Central dysethesia pain after traumatic spinal cord injury dependent on N-Methyl-Diaspartate receptor activation. Neurosurgery 1995;37(6):1080-1087
  • Eide PK.  Pathophysiological mechanism of central neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury.  Spinal Cord 1998;36:601-612.
  • Evans JH.  On disturbance of the body image in paraplegia.  Brain 1962;85:687-700.
  • Frankel HL, Michaelis LS, Golding DR, Beral V.  Blood pressure in paraplegia. Paraplegia 1972;10:193-198.
  • Farkash AE, Portenoy RK.  The pharmacological management of chronic pain in the paraplegic patient.  J       American Paraplegic Society 1986;9(304):41-50.
  • Finley MA, Rodgers MM. Effect of 2-speed geared manual wheelchair propulsion on shoulder pain and function. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007;88(12):1622-1627.
  • Fenollosa P, Pallares J, Cervera J, Pelegrin F, Inigo V, Giner M, et al.  Chronic pain in the spinal cord injured: statistical approach and pharmacological treatment.  Paraplegia 1993;31:722-729.
  • Finnerup NB, Biering-Sorensen F, Johannesen IL, Terkelsen AJ, Juhl GI, Kristensen AD et al. Intravenous lidocaine relieves spinal cord injury pain: a randomized controlled trial. Anesthesiology 2005;102(5):1023-1030.
  • Finnerup NB, Grydehoj J, Bing J, Johannesen IL, Biering-Sorensen F, Sindrup SH et al. Levetiracetam in spinal cord injury pain: a randomized controlled trial. Spinal Cord 2009;47(12):861-867.
  • Floor E, Hsu CC, Davis KM, Jin H, Foos T, Floor E et al. Association of L-glutamic acid decarboxylase to the 70-kDa heat shock protein as a potential anchoring mechanism to synaptic vesicles. Journal of Biological Chemistry 2000;275(27):20822-20828.
  • Finnerup NB, Sindrup SH, Bach FW, Johannesen IL, Jensen TS. Lamotrigine in spinal cord injury pain: a randomized controlled trial. Pain. 2002 Apr;96(3):375-83.
  • Fregni F, Gimenes R, Valle AC, Ferreira MJ, Rocha RR, Natalle L et al. A randomized, sham-controlled, proof of principle study of transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of pain in fibromyalgia. Arthritis & Rheumatism 2006;54(12):3988-3998.
  • Frewin DB, Levitt M, Myers SJ, Co CC, Downey JA.  Catecholamine responses in paraplegia.  Paraplegia 1973;11:238-244.
  • Friedman AH, Nashold BS.  DREZ lesions for relief of pain related to spinal cord injury.  J Neurosurgery 1986;65:465-469.
  • Friedman WH, Rosenblum BN. Paranasal sinus etiology of headaches and facial pain. Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America 1989;22(6):1217-1228.
  • Frisbie JH, Aguilera EJ.  Chronic pain after spinal cord injury: An expedient diagnostic approach.  Paraplegia 1990;28:460-465.
  • Furlan AD, Sandoval JA, Mailis-Gagnon A, Tunks E. Opioids for chronic noncancer pain: a meta-analysis of effectiveness and side effects. CMAJ 2006;174(11):1589-1594.
  • Gajraj NM. Pregablin: Its pharmacology and use in pain management. Anesth Analg 2007;105:1085-15.
  • Gallien P, Nicolas B, Robineau S, Lebot MP, Brissot R.  The reflex sympathetic dystrophy syndrome in patients who have had a spinal cord injury.  Paraplegia 1995;33:715-720.
  • Gellman H, Eckert RR, Botte MJ, Sakimura I, Waters RC.  Reflex sympathetic dystrophy in cervical spinal cord injury patients.  Clin Orthoped and Related Res 1988;233:126-131.
  • Ghostine SY, Comair YG, Turner DM, Kassell NF, Azar CG.  Phenoxybenzamine in the treatment of causalgia.  J Neurosurg 1984;1263-1268.
  • Gibson JC, White LE.  Denervation hyperpathia: A convulsive syndrome of the spinal cord responsive to Carbamazepine therapy.  J Neurosurg 1971;35:287-290.
  • Giardino ND, Jensen MP, Turner JA, Ehde DM, Cardenas DD. Social environment moderates the association between catastrophizing and pain among persons with a spinal cord injury. Pain 2003;106(1-2):19-25.
  • Glynn C, Teddy PJ.  Assessment and management of the patient with spinal cord injury and pain.  In Alderson JD and Frost EAM (eds).  Spinal Cord Injuries, Anaesthetic and Associated Care, Butterworths, London, 1990, pp. 139-166.
  • Guttmann L, Munro AF, Robinson R, Walsh JJ.  Effect of tilting on cardiovascular responses and plasma catecholamine levels in spinal man.  Paraplegia 1963-1964;1:4-18.
  • Guttmann L.  Spinal Cord Injuries, Comprehensive Management and Research.  Blackwell, Oxford, 1973; p. 256-262.
  • Hachen HJ, Rossier AB, Bouvier CA, Ritschard J.  Deficiency within extrinsic prothrombin activator system in patients with acute spinal cord injury.  Paraplegia 1944;1:1019-1020.
  • Hagenbach U, Luz S, Ghafoor N, Berger JM, Grotenhermen F, Brenneisen R et al. The treatment of spasticity with Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol in persons with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2007;45(8):551-562.
  • Hannington-Kiff JG.  Intravenous regional sympathetic blockade with guanethidine.  Lancet 1974;1:1019-1020.
  • Hannington-Kiff JG.  Relief of Sudek's atrophy by regional intravenous guanethidine.  Lancet 1977;1:1132-1133.
  • Harris AJ. Cortical origin of pathological pain. Lancet 1999;354(9188):1464-1466.
  • Hassenbusch SJ, Garber J, Buchser E, DuPen S. Alternative intrathecal agents for the treatment of pain.       Neuromodulation 1999;2:85-91.
  • Hazouri LA, Mueller AD.  Pain threshold studies on paraplegic patients.  AMA Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry 1950;64(5):607-613.
  • Heaton LD, Coates JB.  Neurosurgery of Trauma.  Department of Army, Washington DC, 1965, p. 301-305.
  • Heliporn A.  Two therapeutic experiments on stubborn pain in spinal cord lesions: coupling melitracen-flupenthixol and the transcutaneous electrical stimulation.  Paraplegia 1977-1978;15:353-367.
  • Henry JL.  Pharmacologic studies on the prolonged depressant effects of baclofen on lumbar dorsal horn units in the cat.  Neuropharmalocogy 1982;21:1085-1093.
  • Herman RM, D’Luzansky SC. Pharmacological management of spinal spasticity. J Neurol Rehabil 1991; 5:515-20.
  • Herman RM, D’Luzansky SC, Ippolito R. Intrathecal baclofen suppresses central pain in patients with spinal lesions. A pilot study. Clin J Pain 1992;8(4):338-45.
  • Hocking G, Cousins MJ. Ketamine in chronic pain management: an evidence-based review. Anesth Analg 2003;97(6):1730-1739.
  • Janig W.  Can reflex sympathetic dystrophy be reduced to an alpha-adrenoceptor disease?  American Pain Soc Journal 1992;1(1):16-22.
  • Jensen MP, Barber J, Williams-Avery RM, Flores L, Brown MZ. The effect of hypnotic suggestion on spinal cord injury pain. J Back Musculoskeletal Rehabil 2000;14(1/2):3-10.
  • Johnson M, Martinson M. Efficacy of electrical nerve stimulation for chronic musculoskeletal pain: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Pain 2007;130(1-2):157-165.
  • Kaplan LI, Grynbaum BB, Lloyd KE, Rusk HA.  Pain and spasticity in patients with spinal cord     dysfunction: results of a follow-up study. JAMA 1962;182:918-925.
  • Kazdin AE. Behavior Modification in Applied Settings.6th ed. Belmont, CA:Wadsworth/Thomson Learning; 2001.
  • Kofler M, Donovan WH, Loubser PG, Beric A. Effects of intrathecal baclofen on lumbosacral and cortical somatosensory evoked potentials. Neurology 1992;42(4):864-868.
  • Korn ER. Visualization techniques and altered states of consciousness. In: Sheikh AA, ed. Handbook of Therapeutic Imagery Techniques. Amityville, NY: Baywood Publishing Company Inc; 2002:41–49.
  • Kennedy RH.  The new viewpoint toward spinal cord injuries.  Ann Surg 1946;12:1057-1065.
  • Krueger EG.  Management of painful states in injuries of the spinal cord and cauda equina.  Amer J Phys Med 1960;39:103-110.
  • Krum H, Brown DJ, Rowe PR, Louis WJ, Howes LG.  Steady state plasma.  Steady state plasma [3H] noradrenaline kinetics in quadriplegic spinal cord injury patients.  J Auton Pharmacol 1990;10(4):221-226.
  • Kuhn RA.  Functional capacity of the insolated human spinal cord.  Brain 1950;73:1-51.
  • Kuhn WG.  The care and rehabilitation of patients with injuries of the spinal cord and cauda equina.  Preliminary report on 113 cases.  J Neurosurg 1947;4:40-68.
  • Kvarnstrom A, Karlsten R, Quiding H, Gordh T. The analgesic effect of intravenous ketamine and lidocaine on pain after spinal cord injury. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 2004;48(4):498-506.
  • Levitt M, Levitt JH.  The deafferentation syndrome in monkeys: dysesthesias of spinal origin.  Pain 1981;10:129-147.
  • Lamid S, Chia LS, Kohli A, Cid E.  Chronic pain in spinal cord injury: Comparison between inpatients and outpatients.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1985;66:777-778.
  • Lefkoe TP, Cardenas DD.  Reflex sympathetic dystrophy of the lower extremity in tetraplegia: case report.  Spinal Cord 1996;34:239-242.
  • Levitt M.  The bilaterally symmetrical deafferentation syndrome in macaques after bilateral spinal lesions: evidence for dysesthesias resulting from brain foci and considerations of spinal pain pathways.  Pain 1983;16:167-184.
  • Levendoglu F, Ogun CO, Ozerbil O, Ogun TC, Ugurlu H. Gabapentin is a first line drug for the treatment of neuropathic pain in spinal cord injury. Spine 2004;29(7):743-751.
  • Livshits A, Rappaport ZH, Livshits V, Gepstein R. Surgical treatment of painful spasticity after spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2002;40(4):161-166.
  • Loeser JD, Ward AA, White LE.  Chronic deafferentation of human spinal cord neurons.  J Neurosurg 1968;29:48-50.
  • Loh L, Nathan PW.  Painful peripheral states and sympathetic blocks.  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       1978;14:664-671.
  • Loh L, Nathan PW. Pain due to lesion of central nervous system removed by sympathetic block.  British Medical Journal 1981;28:282:1026:8.
  • Loubser PG, Akman NM. Effects of intrathecal baclofen on chronic spinal cord injury pain. Journal of Pain & Symptom Management 1996;12(4):241-247.
  • Loubser PG, Donovan WH.  Diagnostic spinal anaesthesia in chronic spinal cord injury pain.  Paraplegia 1991;29:36.
  • Maihofner C, Handwerker HO, Neundorfer B, Birklein F. Cortical reorganization during recovery from complex regional pain syndrome. Neurology 2004;63(4):693-701.
  • Marciniak C, Rader L, Gagnon C. The use of botulinum toxin for spasticity after spinal cord injury. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2008;87(4):312-317.
  • Mariano AJ, Britell CW, Umlauf R.  Chronic pain and the psychosocial functioning of spinal cord injured outpatients.  Poster presented at 9th Annual meeting of the Soc Behav Med, San Francisco, CA, 1988.
  • Mariano AJ.  Chronic pain and spinal cord injury:  review and comment.  Clin J Pain 1992; 8:119-122.
  • Martin Ginis KA, Latimer AE, McKechnie K, Ditor DS, Hicks AL, Bugaresti J. Using exercise to enhance subjective well-being among people with spinal cord injury: The mediating influences of stress and pain. Rehabil Psychol 2003;48(3):157-164.
  • Martyn CN, Illis LS, Thom J. Nabilone in the treatment of multiple sclerosis. Lancet 1995;345:579.
  • Mathew GJ, Osterholm JL.  Painful traumatic neuromas.  Surg Clin North Am 1972;51(5):1313-1324.
  • Mathias CJ, Christensen NJ, Corbett JL, Frankel HL, Goodwin TJ, Peart WS.  Plasma catecholamines during paroxysmal neurogenic hypertension in quadriplegic man.  Cir Res 1976;39:204-208.
  • Mathias CJ, Frankel HL, Christensen NJ, Spalding NE.  Enhanced pressor response to noradrenaline in patients with cervical spinal cord transection.  Brain 1976;99:757.
  • Maury M.  About pain and its treatment in paraplegics.  Paraplegia 1977-1978;15:349-352.
  • Max MB, Culhane M, Shafer SC, et al.  Amitriptyline relieves diabetic neuropathy pain in patients with normal or depressed mood.  Neurology 1987;37:589-596.
  • McCasland LD, Budiman-Mak E, Weaver FM, Adams E, Miskevics S. Shoulder pain in the traumatically injured spinal cord patient: evaluation of risk factors and function. J Clin Rheumatol 2006;12(4):179-186.
  • Meinch HM, Schonle PW, Conrad B. Effect of cannabinoids on spasticity and ataxia in multiple sclerosis. J. Neurol 1989;236:120-122.
  • Melzack R, Loeser JD.  Phantom body pain in paraplegics: evidence for a central "pattern generating mechanism" for pain.  Pain 1978;4:195-210.
  • Michaelis LS.  The problem of pain in paraplegia and tetraplegia.  Bull NY Acad Med 1970; 461:88-96.
  • Migita K, Uozumi T, Arita K, Monden S. Transcranial magnetic coil stimulation of motor cortex in patients with central pain.  Neurosurgery 1995;36:1037-1040.
  • Millikan T, Morse, M, Hedrick B. Prevention of shoulder injuries, Sports ‘n Spokes 1951; 17:35-38.
  • Moseley GL. Using visual illusion to reduce at-level neuropathic pain in paraplegia. Pain 2007;130(3):294-298.
  • Moulin DE, Clark AJ, Gilron I, Ware MA, Watson CPN, et al. Pharmacological management of chronic neuropathic pain.  Consensus statement and guidelines from the Canadian Pain Society.  Pain Research & Management: The Journal of the Canadian Pain Society 2007;12:13-21.
  • Munro D. The care of patients paralyzed as the result of injury to the spinal cord and cauda equina. Medical Clinics of North America 1948;32(Bost:Number):Number-91.
  • Munro D.  Two-year end-results in the total rehabilitation of veterans with spinal cord and cauda equina injuries.  New Engl J Med 1950;242:1-10.
  • Munro AF, Robinson R.  Normal levels for plasma adrenaline and noradrenaline compared with those in subjects with complete transverse lesions of the spinal cord.  J Physiol (London) 1958; 141:4P-5P.
  • Naftchi NE, Lowman EW, Sell GH, Rusk HA.  Peripheral circulation and catecholamine metabolism in paraplegia and quadriplegia.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1972;53:357-361, 372.
  • Naftchi NE, Wooten GF, Lowman EW, Axelrod J.  Relationship between serum dopamine-B-hydroxylase activity, catecholamine metabolism, and hemodynamic changes during paroxysmal hypertension in quadriplegia.  Circ Res 1974;35:850-861.
  • Naftchi NE, Demeny M, Vian AT.  Changes neurotransmiter receptors in the spinal cord after paraplegia.  Trans Am Soc Neurochem 1981;12:259.
  • Nash MS, van dV, I, van EN, Johnson BM. Effects of circuit resistance training on fitness attributes and upper-extremity pain in middle-aged men with paraplegia. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 2007;88(1):70-75.
  • Nashold BS Jr, Ostdahl RH.  Dorsal root entry zone lesions for pain relief.  J Neurosurg 1979;51:59-69.
  • Nashold BS, Bullitt E.  Dorsal root entry zone lesions to control central pain in paraplegics.  J Neurosurg 1981;55:414-419.
  • Nashold BS Jr, Alexander E.  Neurosurgical treatment of deafferentation pain.  In: Tollison CD (ed).  Handbook of Chronic Pain Management.  Williams & Wilkens, Baltimore, MD, 1989; p. 125-135.
  • Nashold BS.  Paraplegia and pain.  In Nashold BS, Ovelmen-Levitt J (eds).  Deafferentation Pain Syndromes: Pathophysiology and Treatment, Raven Press Ltd., New York, 1991, pp. 301-319.
  • Nashold BS, Jr., Vieira J, el-Naggar AO. Pain and spinal cysts in paraplegia: treatment by drainage and DREZ operation. British Journal of Neurosurgery 1990;4(4):327-335.
  • Nawoczenski DA, Ritter-Soronen JM, Wilson CM, Howe BA, Ludewig PM. Clinical trial of exercise for shoulder pain in chronic spinal injury. Physical Therapy 2006;86(12):1604-1618.
  • Nayak S, Shiflett SC, Schoenberger NE, Agostinelli S, Kirshblum S, Averill A et al. Is acupuncture effective in treating chronic pain after spinal cord injury? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82(11):1578-1586.
  • Nepomunceno C, Fine PR, Richards JS, Gowens H, Stover SL, Rantanuabol U, Houston R.  Pain in patients with spinal cord injury.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1979;60:595-608.
  • Nicols PJR, Norman PA, Ennis JR. Wheelchair user’s shoulder? Shoulder pain in patients with spinal cord lesions. Scand J Rehab Med 1979;11:29-32.
  • NIH Consensus Conference. Acupuncture JAMA 1998;280:1518-1524.
  • Norrbrink BC, Kowalski J, Lundeberg T. A comprehensive pain management programme comprising educational, cognitive and behavioural interventions for neuropathic pain following spinal cord injury. J Rehabil Med 2006;38(3):172-180.
  • Norrbrink C, Lundeberg T. Tramadol in neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Clinical Journal of Pain 2009;25(3):177-184.
  • Norrbrink BC, Lundeberg T. Non-pharmacological pain-relieving therapies in individuals with spinal cord injury: a patient perspective. Complement Ther Med 2004;12(4):189-197.
  • Ochoa JL, Verdugo R.  Reflex sympathetic dystrophy: Definitions and history of the ideas with a critical review of human studies.  In Low PA (ed).  Clinical Autonomic Disorders.  Boston, Little, Brown and Company, 1993, p. 473-492.
  • Ohry A, Brooks ME, Steinbach TV, Rozin R.  Shoulder complications as a cause of delay in rehabilitation of spinal cord injured patients.  Paraplegia 1978;16:310-316.
  • Osenback RK, Harvey S. Neuraxial infusion in patients with chronic intractable cancer and noncancer pain. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2001;5(3):241-249.
  • Pagni CA.  Central pain due to spinal cord and brainstem damage.  In Wall PD and Melzack R (eds).  Textbook of Pain, 2nd edit, Churchill Livingstone, London, 1989, pp. 634-655.
  • Panagos A, Jensen M, Cardenas DD. Treatment of myofascial shoulder pain in the spinal cord injured population using static magnetic fields: a case series. Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine 2004;27(2):138-142.
  • Penn RD, Kroin JS. Long term Intrathecal  Baclofen infusion for treatment of spasticity. J Neurosurg 1987;66:181-185.
  • Pentland WE, Twomey LT. Upper limb function in persons with long-term paraplegia and implications for independence: part I and II. Paraplegia 1994;34:211-224.
  • Pentland WE, Twomey LT. The weight-bearing upper extremity in women with long-term paraplegia. Paraplegia 1991;29:521-530.
  • Perry KN, Nicholas MK, Middleton JW. Comparison of a pain management program with usual care in a pain management center for people with spinal cord injury-related chronic pain. Clinical Journal of Pain 2010;26(3):206-216.
  • Petro DJ, Ellenberger C. Treatment of human spasticity with delta-9-THC. J Clin Pharmacol 1981; 21:4135-4165.
  • Philip PA, Philip M, Monga TN.  Reflex sympathetic dystrophy in central cord syndrome: case report and       review of the literature.  Paraplegia 1990;28:48-54.
  • Pleger B, Tegenthoff M, Ragert P, Forster AF, Dinse HR, Schwenkreis P et al. Sensorimotor retuning in complex regional pain syndrome parallels pain reduction. Annals of Neurology 2005;57(3):425-429.
  • Plummer JL, Cmielewski PL, Gourlay GK, et al. Antinociceptive and motor effects on intrathecal morphine combined with intrathecal clonidine, noradrenaline, carbachol or midazolam in rats. Pain 1992;49(1):145-152.
  • Pollock LJ, Brown M, Boshes B, Finkelman I, Chor H, Arief AH, Finkel JR.  Pain below the level of injury of the spinal cord.  AMA Arch Neurol Psychiat 1951;65:319-322.
  • Pomeran ZB. Scientific basis of acupuncture. In: Stux G, Pomeran (editors). Basis of Acupuncture. 4 Rev Ed. Springh-Verlag 1998, p.6-72.
  • Powers CM et al. Isometric shoulder torque in subjects with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994;75:761-763.
  • Putzke JD, Richards JS, Kezar L, Hicken BL, Ness TJ. Long-term use of gabapentin for treatment of pain after traumatic spinal cord injury. Clinical Journal of Pain 2002;18(2):116-121.
  • Ragnarsson KT.  Management of pain in persons with spinal cord injury.  Spinal Cord Med 1997;20:186-199.
  • Rainov NG, Heidecke V, Burkert W. Long-Term intrathecal infusion of drug combinations for chronic back and leg pain. J Pain Symptom Manage 2001;22(4):862-871.
  • Raja SN, Treede R-D, Davis KD, Campbell JN.  Systemic alpha-adrenergic blockade with phentolamine: A diagnostic test for sympathetically maintained pain.  Anesthesiology 1991;74:691-698.
  • Rapson LM, Wells N, Pepper J, Majid N, Boon H. Acupuncture as a promising treatment for below-level central neuropathic pain: a retrospective study. Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine 2003;26(1):21-26.
  • Rath SA, Seitz K, Soliman N, Kahamba JF, Antoniadis G, Richter HP. DREZ coagulations for deafferentation pain related to spinal and peripheral nerve lesions: indication and results of 79 consecutive procedures. Stereotactic & Functional Neurosurgery 1997;68(1-4:Pt 1):t-7.
  • Richards JS.  Chronic pain in spinal cord injury: review and comment.  Clin J Pain 1992;8:119-122.
  • Richards JS, Meredith RL, Neopmuceno C, Fine PR, Bennett G.  Psychosocial aspects of chronic pain in spinal cord injury.  Pain 1980;8:355-366.
  • Richardson RR, Meyer PR, Cerullo LJ.  Neurostimulation in the modulation of intractable paraplegic and traumatic neuroma pains.  Pain 1980;8:75-84.
  • Riddoch G.  Phantom limbs and body shape.  Brain 1941;197-222.
  • Rintala DH, Hart KA, Fuhrer MJ.  Self-reported pain in persons with chronic spinal cord injury.  J Amer Paraplegia Soc 1991;14:83.
  • Rintala DH, Holmes SA, Courtade D, Fiess RN, Tastard LV, Loubser PG. Comparison of the effectiveness of amitriptyline and gabapentin on chronic neuropathic pain in persons with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007;88(12):1547-1560.
  • Rintala DH, Loubser PG, Castro J, et al. Chronic pain in a community-based sample of men with spinal cord injury: Prevalence, severity and relationship with impairment, disability, handicap and subjective well-being. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998;79:604-614.
  • Roberts WJ.  A hypothesis on the physiological basis for causalgia and related pains.  Pain 1986;24:297-311.
  • Rose M, Robinson JE, Ells P, Cole JD.  Letter to the editor.  Pain following spinal cord injury: results from a postal survey.  Pain 1988;34:101-102.
  • Rosen L, Ostergren J, Fagrell B, Stranden E.  Skin microvascular and circulation in the sympathetic dystrophies evaluated by ideophotometric capillaroscopy and laser doppler fluxmetry.  Eur J Clin Invest 1988;18:305-308.
  • Rosen L, Ostergren J, Roald OK, Stranden E, Fagrell B.  Bilateral involvement and the effect of
  • sympathetic blockade skin microcirculation in the sympathetic dystrophies.  Microvasc Res 1989;37:289-297.
  • Sampson JH, Cashman RE, Nashold BS, Jr., Friedman AH. Dorsal root entry zone lesions for intractable pain after trauma to the conus medullaris and cauda equina. Journal of Neurosurgery 1995;82(1):28-34.
  • Sandford PR, Benes PS. Use of capsaicin in the treatment of radicular pain in spinal cord injury. J SPINAL CORD MED 2000;23(4):238-243.
  • Sandford PR, Lindblom LB, Haddox JD. Amitriptyline and carbamazepine in the treatment of dysesthetic pain in spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1992;73(3):300-301.
  • Sawynak j, Gabaergic mechanism of analyagesia: an update.  Pharm Biochem Behav 1987;26:462-474.
  • Sherman RA, Ernst JL, Markowski J.  Relationships between near surface blood flow and altered sensation among spinal cord injured veterans.  Am J Phys Med 1986;65(6):281-297.
  • Siddall PJ, Cousins MJ, Otte A, Griesing T, Chambers R, Murphy TK. Pregabalin in central neuropathic pain associated with spinal cord injury: a placebo-controlled trial. Neurology. 2006 Nov 28;67(10):1792-800.
  • Siddall PJ, Molloy AR, Walker S, et al. The efficacy of intrathecal morphine and clonidine in the treatment of pain after spinal cord injury. Anesth Analg 2000;91:(6):1493-1498.
  • Siddall PA, Taylor DA, Cousins MJ.  Classification of pain following spinal cord injury.  Spinal Cord 1997; 35:69-75.
  • Siddall PJ, Taylor DA, McClelland JM, Rutkowski SB, Cousins MJ.  Pain report and the relationship of pain to physical factors in the first 6 months following spinal cord injury.  Pain 1999; 81:187-197.
  • Sie IH, Waters RL, Adkins RH, Gellman H. Upper extremity pain in the postrehabilitation spinal cord injured patient. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1992;73(1):44-48.
  • Silverskiold J. Waters RL. Shoulder pain and functional disability in spinal cord injury patients. Clin Orthopaed Relat Res 1991;272:141-145.
  • Sindou M, Emery E, Blondet E, Mertens P, Sindou M. Microsurgical DREZotomy for pain due to brachial plexus avulsion: long-term results in a series of 37 patients. Stereotactic & Functional Neurosurgery 1997;68(1-4:Pt 1):t-60.
  • Sindou M, Mertens P, Wael M. Microsurgical DREZotomy for pain due to spinal cord and/or cauda equina injuries: long-term results in a series of 44 patients. [Review] [50 refs]. Pain 2001;92(1-2):159-171.
  • Sjolund BH.  Pain and rehabilitation after spinal cord injury: the case of sensory spasticity?  Brain Research Reviews 2002;40:250-256.
  • Spaic M, Petkovic S, Tadic R, Minic L. DREZ surgery on conus medullaris (after failed implantation of vascular omental graft) for treating chronic pain due to spine (gunshot) injuries. Acta Neurochirurgica 1999;141(12):1309-1312.
  • Spaic M, Markovic N, Tadic R. Microsurgical DREZotomy for pain of spinal cord and Cauda equina injury origin: clinical characteristics of pain and implications for surgery in a series of 26 patients. Acta Neurochirurgica 2002;144(5):453-462.
  • Stormer S, Gerner HJ, Gruninger W, Metzmacher K, Follinger S, Wienke C, et al.  Chronic  pain/dysaesthesia in spinal cord injury patients: results of a multicentre study.  Spinal Cord 1997; 35:446-455.
  • Subbarao JV, Klopfstein J, Turpin R. Prevalence and impact of wrist and shoulder pain in patients with spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med 1995;18(1):9-13.
  • Summers JD, Rapoff MA, Varghese G, Porter K, Palmer RE.  Psychosocial factors in chronic spinal cord injury pain.  Pain 1991;47:183-189.
  • Sweet WH.  "Phantom" sensations following intraspinal injuries.  Neurochirurgia 1975;18:139-154.
  • Swerdlow M.  Anticonvulsant drugs and chronic pain.  Clin Neuropharmacol 1984;7:51-82.
  • Tai Q, Kirshblum S, Chen B, Millis S, Johnston M, DeLisa JA. Gabapentin in the treatment of neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, crossover trial. J Spinal Cord Med 2002;25(2):100-105.
  • Tallarida RJ, Stone DJ Jr McCary JD, Raffa RB. Response surface analysis of synergism between morphine and clonidine. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1999;289(1):8-13.
  • Tan G, Rintala DH, Thornby JI, Yang J, Wade W, Vasilev C. Using cranial electrotherapy stimulation to treat pain associated with spinal cord injury. Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development 2006;43(4):461-474.
  • Teasell RW, Delaney GA, Arnold JMO.  Central pain states following spinal cord injuries: similarities to reflex sympathetic dystrophy.  Clinical and Investigative Medicine 1993;16(4):B113.
  • Teasell RW, Arnold JMO. Apha-1 adrenoceptor hyperresponsiveness in 3 neuropathic pain states: complex regional pain syndrome 1, diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain and central pain states following spinal cord injury.  Rain Research and Management 2004;9(2):89-87.
  • To T-P, Lim TC, Hill ST, Frauman AG, Cooper N, Kirsa SW et al. Gabapentin for neuropathic pain following spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2002;40(6):282-285.
  • Turner JA, Cardenas DD.  Chronic pain problems in individuals with spinal cord injuries.  Sem Clin Neuropsychiatry 1999;4:186-194.
  • Turner JA, Cardenas DD, Warms CA, McClellan CB. Chronic pain associated with spinal cord injuries: a community survey. ARCH PHYS MED REHABIL 2001;82(4):501-509.
  • Tunks E.  Pain in spinal cord injured patients.  In Bloch RF, Besbaum M (eds).  Management of spinal cord injuries.  Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore MD, 1986, p. 180-211.
  • Uchikawa K, Toikawa H, Liu M. Subscapularis motor point block for spastic shoulders in patients with cervical cord injury. Spinal Cord 2009;47(3):249-251.
  • Uhle EI, Becker R, Gatscher S, Bertalanffy H. Continuous intrathecal clonidine administration for the treatment of neuropathic pain. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 2000;75(4):167-175.
  • Umlauf RL, Moore JE, Britell CW.  Prevalence and nature of the pain experience in spinal cord injury.  Poster presented at the 8th Annual Meeting of the Soc Behav Med., Washington, D.C., 1987.
  • Ungerleider T, Andyrsiak T, Fairbanks L, Ellison GW, Myels LW. Delta-9-THC in the treatment of spasticity associated with multiple sclerosis. Adv Alcohol Substance Abuse 1987;7:39-50.
  • Vallbona C, Lipscomb HS, Carter RE.  Endocrine responses to orthostatic hypotension in quadriplegia.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1966;47:412-421.
  • Wainapel SF, Freed MM.  Reflex sympathetic dystrophy in quadriplegia: case report.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1984;65:35-38.
  • Wainapel SF.  Reflex sympathetic dystrophy following traumatic myelopathy.  Pain 1984;18:345-349.
  • Wade DT, Robson R, House H, Makel P, Aram J.  A preliminary controlled study to determine whether whole-plant cannabis extreacts can improve intractable neurogenic symptoms, Clinical Rehabilitation 2003;17(1):21-29.
  • White JC, Sweet WH.  Pain and the Neurosurgeon.  Springfield IL, Charles C. Thomas, 1969.
  • Widerstrom-Noga EG, Felipe-Cuervo E, Yezierski RP.  Relationships among clinical characteristics of chronic pain after spinal cord injury.  Archive Phys Med Rehab 2001;82:1191-1197.
  • Widerstrom-Noga EG, Turk DC. Types and effectiveness of treatments used by people with chronic pain associated with spinal cord injuries: influence of pain and psychosocial characteristics. Spinal Cord 2003;41(11):600-609.
  • Wollaars MM, Post MW, van Asbeck FW, Brand N. Spinal cord injury pain: the influence of psychologic factors and impact on quality of life. Clin J Pain 2007;23(5):383-391.
  • Wong JY, Rapson LM. Acupuncture in the management of pain of musculoskeletal and neurologic origin. Phys Med Rehabil Clin North Am 1999;10:531-545.
  • Woolsey RM.  Chronic pain following spinal cord injury.  J Amer Paraplegic Soc 1986;9:39-40.
  • Woolsey RM.  Pain in spinal cord disorders.  In: Young RR, Woolsey RM (eds).  Diagnosis and Management of Disorders of the Spinal Cord.  Saunders, Philadelphia PA,  1995;p. 354-362.
  • Wynn Parry CB.  Pain in avulsion lesions of the brachial plexus.  Pain 1980;9:41-53.
  • Wynn Parry CB.  The management of injuries to the brachial plexus.  Proc Roy Soc B 1984;67:488-490.
  • Yaksh T. Pharmacology of spinal adrenergic systems which modulate spinal cord nociceptive processing. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1985;22:323-330.

Physical Activity

Introduction

Many authors have noted the importance of participation in physical activity and exercise programming for persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) and several of these have provided reviews of the various purported benefits that may occur with regular and appropriate physical activity (Cowell et al. 1986; Washburn & Fignoni 1999; Jacobs & Nash 2001; Nash 2005; Devillard et al. 2007; Fernhall et al. 2008). Despite this assertion and the relative plethora of studies cited within these reviews, especially in some areas (e.g., cardiovascular fitness), there is much that remains to be established about the relationship of exercise and physical activity to the health and well-being of persons with SCI. It has been noted that the majority of physical activity studies are often lower quality with few randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (Valent et al. 2007; Fernhall et al. 2008), which is not surprising as exercise studies are challenging to conduct in and of themselves and this is compounded by multiple further challenges that are presented within the SCI population (Ginis & Hicks, 2005). Little is known about the details of what exercise modality might be best suited for individuals with SCI relative to their varying physical levels of function. Specific information about frequency, intensity and duration is typically lacking. In general, there is a dearth of evidence-based information on which to provide guidance for the promotion and prescription of exercise, especially for the various subsets of individuals that comprise this population (Ginis & Hicks 2007; Myslinski 2005).

The present chapter aims to describe the level of evidence that exists for physical activity and its effect on various aspects of health and wellness for persons with SCI. In particular, we review the evidence that exists for the effectiveness of physical activity on enhancing strength, muscle function, rehabilitation recovery (i.e., functional outcomes) and subjective well-being (including depression and quality of life) as well as the relationship of physical activity to the prevention and minimization of various secondary complications and other health conditions associated with SCI. Following this, we examine the studies that assess the rates of physical activity participation and identify barriers to participation noted in the literature. Finally, we describe the level of evidence associated with interventions targeted at persons with SCI designed to enhance participation in physical activity.

Wolfe DL, Martin Ginis KA, Latimer AE, Foulon BL, Eng JJ, Hicks AL, Hsieh JTC (2010). Physical Activity and SCI. In Eng JJ, Teasell RW, Miller WC, Wolfe DL, Townson AF, Hsieh JTC, Connolly SJ, Mehta S, Sakakibara BM, editors. Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Evidence. Version 3.0.

Effects of Physical Activity

SCI impacts many body systems both immediately and in the long-term as noted in numerous reviews (Bauman et al. 1999; Shields 2002; Nash 2005). In particular, Nash (2005) and Jacobs and Nash (2004) point to physical deconditioning across the musculoskeletal system (i.e., bone, muscle and joint) and alterations in both cardiac and peripheral vascular structure and functioning in persons with SCI. These issues, when combined with continued inactivity, result in seemingly inevitable body system decline and are linked to the increased incidence of various secondary complications and other health conditions associated with SCI such as cardiovascular disease, respiratory complications, osteoporosis, pain, spasticity and diabetes. Evidence for routine physical activity has been noted as an important factor in maintaining health and wellness and preventing many of these conditions in the able-bodied population and in those with chronic disease such as arthritis (US Department of Health and Human Services 1996; Warburton et al. 2006; Kruk 2007). However, the evidence linking health and physical activity in persons with SCI or similar conditions is far from established, despite the importance placed on physical activity by clinicians, consumers and researchers alike in optimizing recovery and maintaining health (Rimmer 1999; Anderson 2004; Fernhall et al. 2008).

In reviewing the literature associated with various physical activity and exercise interventions in SCI, it was apparent that the vast majority of studies examine physiological parameters (e.g., VO2, cardiovascular responses to exercise) that would be characterized as relating to body function and structure within the framework of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). We do not report here the numerous studies that address these physiologic outcome measures other than to note the various conclusions made surrounding specific risk factors associated with the development of cardiovascular disease or other health conditions. There is a relative dearth of studies examining the effect of physical activity interventions on functional outcomes, especially those that might be characterized as measures of activity or participation (as per the ICF). This suggests a target for future research in elucidating either the functional consequences or societal participation benefits associated with physical activity interventions for persons with SCI.

It should be noted that while one of the aims of this chapter is to bring the information about physical activity and SCI into one place, most of these topic areas comprise individual chapters with SCIRE. Therefore, when there may be substantial duplication with an existing SCIRE chapter we have selected to simply reference the existing chapters that contain information about physical activity interventions and to also bring forward the conclusions (evidence statements and bottom-line conclusions) from these chapters so the reader will gain a sense of the degree of evidence across these various conditions. The reader is encouraged to examine the referenced chapter for surrounding discussion and more information concerning the various studies and details about the specific interventions comprising the evidence. Of note, many of the therapies associated with upper limb or lower limb management involve therapeutic exercise programming (often associated with physical or occupational therapy) and for these we simply refer the reader to SCIRE Chapter’s: Upper Limb Rehabilitation Following Spinal Cord Injury (Connolly et al. 2010) and Lower Limb Rehabilitation Following Spinal Cord Injury (Lam et al. 2010) respectively. This has meant that the conclusions related to specific rehabilitation interventions (e.g., Body weight supported treadmill training, FES upper and lower limb applications) may not be comprehensive within the present chapter, but should be augmented by those from the noted chapters.

The following section describes the evidence for physical activity as an intervention directed towards persons with SCI in enhancing strength, muscle function, rehabilitation recovery (i.e., functional outcomes) and subjective well-being (including depression and quality of life) as well as in preventing or minimizing common secondary conditions typically encountered following SCI. These include the role of physical activity in maintaining or enhancing cardiovascular health and bone health as well as preventing or mitigating disability associated with respiratory complications, pain, spasticity and periodic leg movements.

Effects on Muscle Morphology, Strength and Endurance

Even though the most visible aspect of SCI involves impaired muscle function ranging from slight weakness to complete paralysis, there is far more research addressing aerobic training than pure resistance training for enhancing strength, endurance and other aspects of muscle function (Jacobs and Nash 2004). The effects of aerobic exercise on aerobic capacity will be summarised in a subsequent section that is focused on cardiovascular health. The present section describes the effects of various forms of exercise (i.e., not only pure resistance training but also those that incorporate the more frequently implemented endurance training as well) and the various adaptations that result in muscle. These adaptations are characterized as those pertaining to muscle morphology or muscle function. Muscle morphological changes in response to appropriately configured physical activity interventions are reflected in such outcomes as overall changes to muscle cross-sectional area (i.e, direct or indirect measures such as limb circumference) or in changes to individual muscle fibres as reflected by changes in individual muscle fibre size or fibre type. Changes in muscle function are often assessed by direct measurement of muscle strength or power output or might be reflected in muscular endurance (i.e., exercise capacity changes) such as that seen in the ability to manage greater loads over a longer period of time during a progressive exercise program.

Table 1 Physical Activity and Adaptations to Muscle Morphology and Strength

Discussion

Muscle Morphology

A variety of benefits related to gross muscle morphology have been demonstrated in numerous investigations employing multi-week progressive exercise programs of FES-assisted cycling in which lower limb muscles (i.e., typically quadriceps, hamstrings and gluteal muscles) are stimulated to produce cycling movements against resistance (Sloan et al. 1994; Hjeltnes et al. 1997; Mohr et al. 1997; Chilibeck et al. 1999; Scremin et al. 1999; Crameri et al. 2004; Heesterbeek et al. 2005; Griffin et al. 2009). Each of these FES-assisted cycling programs consisted of a minimum of three 30 minute sessions per week with program duration ranging from 8 weeks to 1 year with progressive resistance customized to the individual participant. Of note, Heesterbeek et al. 2005 employed a hybrid FES-assisted cycling protocol in which upper limb cycling was also incorporated into the physical activity intervention and Scremin et al. 1999 had a 4 phase intervention in which the final phase consisted of adding upper limb ergometry to FES-assisted lower limb cycling. These were the only investigations that incorporated upper body exercise although outcome measurement was limited to the muscles of the lower limb. All studies, other than that conducted by Crameri et al. 2004, were uncontrolled investigations incorporating either a prospective pre-post or retrospective case series study design. In addition, all of the studies were relatively small with sample sizes of 18 persons or less. Benefits to gross muscle morphology consisted of significant increases in total body lean muscle mass (Griffin et al. 2009), thigh muscle mass (Mohr et al. 1997), cross-sectional area of overall thigh muscle (Sloan et al. 1994; Hjeltnes et al. 1997, Scremin et al. 1999) and overall thigh volume (Heesterbeek et al. 2005) as well as significant reductions in muscle atrophy (Mohr et al. 1997). Significant increases were also seen in overall cross-sectional area or mean muscle fibre cross-sectional area within individual muscles (Chilibeck et al. 1999; Scremin et al. 1999; Crameri et al. 2004).

Other forms of neuromuscular electric stimulation resistance exercise training have also been shown to produce beneficial muscle adaptations. In a relatively large study, persons with complete denervation due to a conus or caudal lesion (n=20 completing) underwent a 2 year home-based progressive electrical stimulation program which culminated in 30 minute sessions, 5 days/week involving a combination of twitch and tetanic stimulation patterns focusing on quadriceps but also on gluteal, hamstring and other lower limb muscles (Kern et al. 2010). Quadriceps and hamstring muscle cross-sectional areas were significantly larger with training with these results being more pronounced for the quadriceps. Similarly, significant increases in quadriceps muscle cross-sectional areas were produced in 5 males with ASIA A SCI with a home-based, two day/week program over twelve weeks in which four sets of ten unilateral, dynamic knee extensions were elicited by appropriate stimulation (Mahoney et al. 2005). A later report extended these observations with similar results following 18 weeks (Sabatier et al. 2006).

Other modes of endurance-based resistance exercise also led to similar muscle adaptations. For example, sustained participation in body weight support treadmill training 2 or 3 times/week resulted in significant increases in overall muscle cross-sectional areas in the thigh and lower leg muscles (Giangregorio et al. 2005; Giangregorio et al. 2006; Carvalho et al. 2008)as well as increases in mean individual muscle fibre sizes (Stewart et al. 2004) and partial reversal of muscle atrophy (Giangregorio et al. 2006). Of note, Carvalho et al. 2008; Carvalho et al. 2009 conducted a controlled trial (n=15) which showed significantly greater increases in MRI-derived quadriceps cross-sectional area with neuromuscular stimulation combined with body-weight supported treadmill gait training as compared to that seen with conventional physiotherapy. This was conducted over a 6 month period after which the gait training was offered to the control group. Gait training sessions consisted of 20 minute sessions at a frequency of twice/week.

To this point, of all studies noted in this section, each of the interventions were applied to individuals with chronic SCI (i.e., > 6 months post-injury) with the exception of Giangregorio et al. 2005 who performed body weight support treadmill training on those more newly injured (i.e., 2-6 months post-injury). In addition, across studies participants had mostly complete or in rare instances near-complete SCI (i.e., AIS A, B or C).

A novel methodology was employed by Crameri et al. 2004 to investigate the effects of load on these types of muscle adaptations. These investigators used a forty-five minute/day, three day/week FES-assisted cycling exercise protocol over ten weeks in which only one leg of each study participant was permitted to cycle against minimal load. The contralateral leg was also provided similar stimulation parameters as the “cycling” leg but these were applied against a fixed load so as to provoke rhythmic isometric contractions of the quadriceps and hamstrings against resistance. Exercise progressions were implemented with increases to the work-rest cycle and not to resistance as is often done in trials of FES-assisted cycling ergometry. This controlled investigation demonstrated that the amount of resistance is important in producing a training effect as greater increases in isometric force generation and muscle fibre cross-sectional area were demonstrated for the static, high-resistance training condition.

Additionally, muscle biopsies have been performed before and after training, permitting investigation of the effects of physical activity on fibre type. Following SCI, (especially in those with complete or near complete lesions), there is an established transformation of muscle fibres away from type IIa toward type IIx fibres reflecting a functional shift towards less aerobic, more easily fatigable muscle (Grimby et al. 1976; Round et al. 1993). This shift was reversed over ten weeks (Crameri et al. 2002) and also at 6 months of a 1 year program (Andersen et al. 1996) of three day/week FES-assisted cycling exercise and with six months of three day/week body weight-supported treadmill training (Stewart et al. 2004) as each of these studies reported an increase in type IIa fibres and a corresponding reduction in type IIx (or IIb) fibres following training. More interestingly, similar results were seen in Crameri et al. 2004’s investigation of the effect of static load vs. dynamic minimal load conditions with shifts of type IIx to type IIa muscle fibres apparent for both conditions along with the additional finding of a significantly greater increase in type I fibres only for the static, high-resistance trained leg. This represents an even more dramatic adaptation toward the aerobic, oxidative capacity of muscle with this type of training. Kern et al. 2010 demonstrated similar findings with their home-based neuromuscular stimulation promotion with increases in muscle fibre size that reverses the atrophic processes noted in denervated muscle.

There is also some evidence that passive cycling using upper-body assistance to drive paralyzed leg muscles involving 2 day/week sessions over 12 weeks may be sufficient to prevent these inactivity-related shifts towards more “fast” type muscle fibers. Willoughby et al. 2000 demonstrated significant increases in mRNA expression for type IIa fibres (and also for type IIx fibres) in the presence of decreasing proteolytic activity typically associated with muscle degradation. This passive exercise was insufficient to produce a significant increase in muscle size as indicated by no change in thigh girth and it is important to note that the leg movement required upper body voluntary exercise.

Strength and Muscular Endurance

In contrast to those investigations assessing outcomes related to muscle morphology, those assessing strength or muscular endurance were much more diverse with respect to the exercise modes employed. Notably, five investigators incorporated RCT study designs (Needham-Shropshire et al. 1997; Hicks et al. 2003; Hartkopp et al. 2003; Glinsky et al. 2008; Jacobs 2009) despite the acknowledged difficulty in fully implementing such features as participant blinding with the physical activity interventions typically associated with this design (Ginis and Hicks 2005).

Of these RCTs, four of five trials resulted in statistically significantly increases in strength, although there were different training paradigms used to achieve these results across the trials. Needham-Shropshire et al. 1997 used a paired-randomization approach to assign subjects with chronic cervical SCI (n=27) to one of three groups:1) those receiving 8 weeks of neuromuscular stimulation-assisted arm ergometry exercise (NMS); 2) those receiving 4 weeks of NMS assisted exercise followed by 4 weeks of voluntary arm crank exercise; and 3) those participating in a control condition – voluntary exercise for 8 weeks without the application of NMS. Muscle strength was assessed by manual muscle testing in the triceps and the largest treatment effect (i.e., more muscles showing an increase of at least one muscle grade) was seen in Group 1 subjects (p<0.0005) although there were also a significant number of muscles that demonstrated an increase in muscle grade in Group 2 (p<0.03) relative to the control condition. In a pre-post study, Cameron et al. (1998) used a prototype of the NMS-assisted arm crank ergometer used by Needham-Shropshire et al. 1997 to elicit significant improvements to triceps muscle strength following a three days/week upper body training program conducted over eight weeks.

These results are consistent with those reported by Hicks et al. 2003 who conducted an RCT (n=34, with 11 of 21 completing in the exercise group) of a twice weekly progressive voluntary arm ergometry cycling and resistance training exercise.program with sessions of 90-120 minutes over nine months. These investigators noted significant increases (p<0.05) in muscle strength for 3 different upper body maneuvers involving triceps, biceps and anterior deltoid bilaterally at nine months as compared to baseline, although these increases in muscle strength showed progressive improvement over the nine months.

Jacobs (2009) compared a resistance training paradigm involving 3 sets of 10 repetitions across six stations at 60-70% of a maximal single effort vs endurance training for 30 minutes involving arm cranking at 70%-85% of peak HR in persons with neurologically complete paraplegia (n=18). There were 3 sessions/week over a 12-wk training period with standardized exercise progressions for both the resistance training and endurance training groups and participants were matched between groups by body mass and gender. Muscular strength was significantly increased (p<0.01) with resistance training for each of the 6 isotonic strength testing maneuveurs corresponding to those involved for each of the resistance training stations. There were no strength changes apparent for those in the arm ergometry group (i.e., endurance training). However, muscular endurance, as indicated by performance on the Wingate anaerobic power test, was significantly improved with both forms of training, although these improvements were most pronounced with resistance training.

The RCT conducted by Glinsky et al. 2008 failed to show statistically significant increases in strength or muscular endurance (i.e., fatigue resistance) in wrist extensor or flexor muscles that were at least partially paralyzed in persons with tetraplegia (n=32). There was an overall mean increase of 8% and 11% in strength and muscular endurance respectively with training vs no training groups but this was deemed clinically insignificant. This study involved a resistance training program involving 3 sets of 10 repetitions using a customized device that permitted those with even minimal force generation to participate in a progressive exercise program. These authors noted that unlike other trials (e.g., Hicks et al. 2003), all participants had at least some paresis although it should be noted that there was a slight imbalance between experimental (i.e., training) vs control (i.e., no training) groups with respect to a slightly greater impairment in participants in the training group (i.e., 9 vs 6 persons with ASIA A and 4 vs 0 persons with an initial muscle grade of 2).

A similar training system to that employed by Glinsky et al. 2008 was used by Hartkopp et al. 2003 to examine the effect of electrical stimulation on strength and fatigue resistance in wrist extensor musculature in persons with tetrapegia (n=12 completing trial). This RCT used the nontrained arm as a control and demonstrated significant strength gains with a high resistance protocol, but not a low resistance protocol – each involving 5, 30 min sessions/week over 12 weeks. The high resistance protocol consisted of stimulation against a maximal load, whereas the low resistance protocol used a resistance of 50% of maximal load. Both training protocols were effective in improving resistance to fatigue.

There were also several investigations involving mostly pre-post study designs resulting in improved muscle function with different forms of electrically-stimulated exercise. For example, FES-assisted cycling programs involving the lower limbs and of varying durations and frequencies have demonstrated beneficial effects on muscle function. Griffin et al. (2009) demonstrated improved ASIA motor (and sensory scores) for the lower extremity following FES cycling for 2-3 times per week over 10 weeks in a group of persons with mostly incomplete SCI from C4-T7 (i.e., 13 of 18 with incomplete SCI). In persons with complete chronic SCI, FES-assisted cycling is effective for improving resistance to muscular fatigue as indicated by increases to sustained torque generation with repetitive stimulation in programs employing as little as 3, 30 min sessions/week over 6 weeks (Gerrits et al. 2000). A more extensive long-term program involving 5, 1 hour sessions/week over 1 year also was effective in improving fatigue resistance as well as producing a fivefold increase in maximal electrically stimulated torque (i.e., strength of contraction), although this remained lower than in able-bodied individuals (Duffell et al. 2008). Interestingly, in a later study, Gerrits et al. 2002 demonstrated that fatigue resistance was improved more effectively by low frequency (i.e., 10 Hz) vs high frequency (i.e., 50 Hz) stimulation, although each was equally effective in improving force generation (i.e., tetanic tension development).

In addition, several investigators have employed other approaches to lower limb neuromuscular stimulation such as the long-term home-based stimulation program by Kern et al. (2008) which resulted in a near ten-fold increase in stimulation-elicited muscle force in addition to the benefits to muscle morphology noted above. Sabatier et al. 2006 conducted a smaller pre-post study (n=5 persons with complete SCI) of an eighteen week home-based neuromuscular electrical stimulation resistance training program involving bi-weekly quadriceps training comprised of four sets of 10 dynamic knee extensions against resistance while in a seated position. This resulted in significant increases in strength (i.e., weight lifted), as well as a 60% reduction in muscle fatigue (p = 0.001).

Given the results of these studies, it is clear that there are a variety of approaches involving neuromuscular stimulation to the lower limb that accrue benefits to muscle function. However, information regarding the minimum requirements with respect to frequency, intensity, duration  of a training program and how each of these might interact with different patient subgroups remains to be definitively established. Interestingly, Petrofsky et al. 2000 conducted a study to assess the effect of altering various parameters associated with a ten week training program of quadriceps muscle stimulation. These investigators assigned subjects (n=90) to 10 different treatment groups and examined the effect of altering some of the parameters associated individual treatment sessions. Greater strength changes were seen for 30 minute sessions as compared to 5 or 15 minute sessions and for 3 day/week training as compared to 1 or 5 day/week training programs. In addition, strength gains and total work capacity was optimized by incorporating a pattern of 3 s extension - 3 s flexion – 6 s rest as compared to longer or shorter durations of work-rest cycles.Several investigations of voluntary exercise employing pre-post study designs have demonstrated strength benefits (in addition to other benefits). These studies have been conducted mostly in persons with paraplegia and have included circuit resistance training for 3 days/week (Durán et al. 2001; Jacobs et al. 2001; Nash et al. 2007), a combination of resistance training and plyometric training (Gregory et al. 2007) and 3, 60 minute sessions/week of kayak ergometer training over 10 weeks (Bjerkefors et al. 2006).

Conclusions

  • There is level 2 evidence from a single study with support from several level 4 studies that an appropriately-configured program of functional electrical stimulation of lower limb muscle in persons with SCI produces muscle adaptations such as increasing individual muscle fibre and overall muscle size and may result in the prevention and/or recovery of muscle atrophy.
  • There is level 2 evidence from a single study with support from several level 4 studies that an appropriately-configured program of functional electrical stimulation of lower limb muscle in persons with SCI results in an increase in muscle fibre types with more aerobic (endurance) capabilities, (most notably a shift in type IIx to type IIa muscle fibres).
  • There is level 1 evidence from a single RCT with support from a single level 4 study that functional electrical stimulation-assisted upper limb cycle ergometry is capable of producing significant increases in upper limb muscle strength in persons with tetraplegia.
  • There is level 2 evidence from a single RCT that voluntary upper limb cycle ergometry is capable of producing significant increases in upper limb muscle strength in triceps, biceps and anterior deltoid in persons with SCI.
  • There is level 1 evidence from a single RCT that voluntary upper limb resistance exercise is effective in increasing upper limb muscle strength in persons with paraplegia.
  • There is conflicting level 1 evidence across two RCTs that electrical stimulation-assisted resistance training of paretic wrist extensors or flexors increases strength and fatigue resistance in persons with tetraplegia.
  • There is level 4 evidence from three studies that suggests that body-weight supported treadmill training in persons with SCI produces muscle adaptations of increasing individual muscle fibre size and overall muscle size and may result in the prevention and/or recovery of muscle atrophy.
  • There is level 4 evidence from several pre-post studies that circuit resistance training and other forms of resistance training combined with other approaches may increase upper limb muscle strength in triceps, biceps and anterior deltoid in persons with tetraplegia.
  • Various forms of exercise, most notably functional electrical stimulation of upper and lower limbs, body-weight support treadmill training and circuit resistance training, may be effective in increasing muscle strength and reducing muscle atrophy. The former two are more appropriate for those with greater muscle impairment.

Physical Activity and Functional Improvement Including Activities of Daily Living

As demonstrated in the previous section, appropriately configured exercise has been demonstrated to increase muscle strength and reduce atrophy. Most rehabilitation professionals presume there is also a clear link between therapeutic exercise and functional improvement that might manifest in enhanced performance of activities of daily living (ADLs). The present section examines the literature that assesses the functional consequences of physical activity programming. As described in of SCIRE Chapter: Rehabilitation Practices (Wolfe et al. 2010), there are numerous reports of substantial gains achieved over the period of inpatient rehabilitation for outcome measures associated with functional independence (e.g., Functional Independence Measure (FIM(TM))) but the definitive attribution of these gains to specific aspects of rehabilitation programming remains to be fully elucidated.

Table 2 Physical Activity and Functional Improvement Including ADLs

Discussion

Of the interventional studies noted in Table 2, only four could be described as examining functionally-based outcome measures as a primary measure of interest and one of these was a very small pre-post study (n=3) incorporating a single-subject design with mixed results and no group results reported in response to a body-weight support treadmill training intervention (i.e., Effing et al. 2006). Of note, Klose et al. 1990 used an RCT design to examine the effect of four different combinations of conventional physical exercise therapy (PET i.e., strengthening, mat mobility, and transfer, self-care and wheelchair skills training), neuromuscular stimulation (NMS)-assisted exercise or EMG (EMG) biofeedback training focused on the upper limbs of males and females with tetraplegia (C4-C6) who were at least 1 year post-injury (n=43, 39 completing). Treatment subgroups received one of the following: 1) 8 weeks each of EMG biofeedback followed by PET; 2) 8 weeks each of EMG biofeedback followed by NMS; 3) 8 weeks each of NMS followed by PET; 4) 16 weeks of PET. All four of these treatment groups showed significant improvement on mobility and self-care scores (p<0.05) although there were no differences between groups with each method equally beneficial in terms of functional improvement.

In addition, da Silva et al. 2005 conducted a prospective controlled trial (n=16) examining the effect of a 4 month swimming program (45 minute 2x/week) on persons with complete SCI (14 with paraplegia) who had just been discharged from inpatient SCI rehabilitation. The primary outcome measure was the FIM and significant differences were noted for the FIM transfer subscale score (p=0.02), overall motor subscale score(p=0.01) and overall score (p=0.01) between those participating in the swimming program as compared to those in the control group who performed only their routine daily activities.

Duran et al. 2001 also incorporated the FIM in assessing the effects of a mixed exercise program involving three 120 minute sessions/week over 16 weeks. Participants were outpatients with paraplegia and 12 of 13 were ≥5 months post-injury (median 10 months). This structured program consisted of activities that were focused on mobility, aerobic resistance, strength, coordination, recreation and relaxation. Significant increases were seen in total FIM score relative to baseline (p<0.001) and time was reduced for all nine wheelchair skills tested (p<0.04 or less) associated with the exercise program. These benefits along with increases in strength and exercise capacity were seen in the absence of statistically significant changes in various physiological parameters (i.e., lipid profile, body composition) although each of these variables did approach significance (p=0.076 to 0.2).

Other investigations incorporated measures associated with the performance of ADLs or other functional measures as secondary objectives. Subjective self-reports of improved walking (with an aid), transferring, dressing and other tasks of daily living along with concomitant strength improvements associated with a FES cycling program were reported by Sloan et al. 1994 for all the incomplete study participants with chronic SCI (n=11 of 12). Hjeltnes and Wallberg-Henriksson 1998 demonstrated significant improvements in the Sunnaas ADL index and muscle strength in persons with tetraplegia in response to a 6-8 week program of 3 day/week 30 minute arm ergometry sessions. This latter investigation was conducted in persons with sub-acute SCI as part of inpatient rehabilitation. Without a suitable control condition, it was uncertain if these benefits were due to the arm ergometry intervention or other aspects of the rehabilitation program or were associated with natural recovery.

Conclusions

  • There is level 2 evidence from a low quality RCT that either 16 weeks of physical exercise therapy alone or a combination of 2, 8 week blocks of this therapy, neuromuscular stimulation or EMG biofeedback may enhance self-care and mobility scores.
  • There is level 2 evidence from a single prospective, controlled trial that a twice weekly swimming program conducted over 4 months immediately following rehabilitation discharge may enhance motor FIM scores. This finding of exercise-related enhancement of functional outcomes is generally supported by 3 additional level 4 studies that employ different modes of physical activity associated with either increases to overall FIM scores or improved performance of ADLs.
  • Prospective, controlled trials are required to better determine the relationship of physical activity programming and functional benefits. There is no evidence for a relationship between specific program parameters (e.g., mode, intensity, frequency, duration) that might be necessary to achieve particular benefits.
  • Physical activity programming may be useful in improving functional outcomes such as performance of ADLs but there is little information describing specific exercise parameters that would be most effective in this respect.

Physical Activity and Subjective Well-Being

Subjective well-being (SWB) refers to how people evaluate their lives. It is a broadly-defined construct that encompasses an array of factors such as psychological well-being, satisfaction with health and physical functioning, and overall life satisfaction. Within the general population, considerable research has shown that regular participation in physical activity is associated with improvements in a wide range of SWB outcomes. In contrast, relatively little research has examined the effects of physical activity on aspects of SWB among people living with SCI.

Although a couple of Level 1 and 2 studies have been conducted, most research examining physical activity and SWB has been cross-sectional (e.g., Manns and Chad 1999; Muraki et al. 2000; Stevens et al. 2008; Tawashy et al. 2009) and is excluded from the present analysis. A wide range of SWB outcomes have been examined such as perceptions of community integration, pain, mood states, anxiety, perceived health, and self-efficacy. Some of these aspects--and their relationship with physical activity--are discussed in different chapters (e.g., community reintegration, pain). Other aspects (e.g., mood states, self-efficacy) have been examined in too few high quality studies to generate reliable conclusions, and have been excluded from the present analysis. Two aspects--depression and quality of life-- have been relatively well-studied in relationship to physical activity. As such, this section reviews only those studies that have included a measure of depression or quality of life.

Table 3 Physical Activity and Subjective Well-Being

Discussion

With regards to depression, all but two studies (Hicks et al. 2005; Warms et al. 2004) showed positive effects of exercise on depressive symptoms (Guest et al. 1997; Hicks et al. 2003; Latimer et al. 2004; Latimer et al. 2005; Martin Ginis et al. 2003). In addition, Kennedy et al. 2006 showed significant reductions in anxiety but not depression using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale with their 1 week physical activity course. Given the variety of modes of physical activity examined in these studies, the consistent findings speak to the robustness of the relationship between physical activity and depression among people living with SCI. In the studies that showed no significant effects of exercise on depression (Hicks et al. 2005; Kennedy et al. 2006; Warms et al. 2004), participants’ baseline depression scale scores were already extremely low, indicating minimal depressive symptomatology and very little room for improvement. As exercise has been shown to exert its greatest effects on people with greater depressive symptomatology, these findings are not particularly surprising.

With regards to quality of life, all of the Level 1, 2, and 4 studies showed that exercise training was associated with better quality of life (Ditor et al. 2003; Effing et al. 2006; Hicks et al. 2003; 2005; Kennedy et al. 2006; Latimer et al. 2004; Latimer et al. 2005; Martin Ginis et al. 2003; Semerjian et al. 2005). Again, given that this association held across different types of physical activity modalities and in studies that used different measures of quality of life, the physical activity-quality of life relationship appears to be robust. However, the one case-study (Effing et al. 2006) did not find quality of life improvements for two of its three participants. When contrasted with the findings of the higher quality studies, these null findings speak to the importance of examining changes in quality of life over time, and in sufficiently large and representative samples, in order to properly assess the effects of physical activity on SWB.

How does physical activity improve depression, quality of life, and potentially other aspects of SWB? This question was examined in a series of papers using data from Hicks et al. 2003’s RCT. Overall, these studies showed that exercise-induced reductions in stress and pain mediated the effects of exercise on quality of life and depression (Latimer et al. 2004; Martin Ginis et al. 2003). In other words, exercise training led to reductions in stress and pain, which, in turn, led to improvements in quality of life and depressive symptoms. There was also evidence that among people who were experiencing stressful life events, exercise helped to buffer the effects of the stress on their SWB (Latimer et al. 2005).

In general, several of the studies examining subjective well-being are constrained by an inadequate control group, making it difficult to discern whether it is the physical activity itself or some other aspect of a structured program that may be contributing to beneficial effects. Regardless, the conclusions below are based on the relative consistency across studies, despite these limitations. Of note, the trials conducted by Hicks et al. 2003 and Latimer et al. 2004 did provide an opportunity for education about exercise to their control group participants which afforded a more effective comparison than other trials which simply asked control group participants to maintain their usual activity patterns and defer initiation of an exercise program until after the study trial. 

Conclusion

  • Based on level 1 and 2 evidence from 4 studies (note that these studies draw on a common data set), exercise is an effective intervention for improving two aspects of SWB--quality of life and depressive symptomatology. For the most part, the level 4 and 5 evidence also supports this conclusion.
  • Emerging data from these studies suggest that changes in stress and pain may be the mechanisms underlying the effects of exercise on quality of life and depression. Further research is needed to examine other aspects of SWB in relation to physical activity.
  • Exercise is an effective strategy for improving at least two aspects of subjective well-being - depression and quality of life.

Physical Activity and Secondary Conditions

Numerous investigators and program planners have pointed to the occurrence of secondary complications or other health conditions that are encountered all too frequently by those with SCI as a means of providing rationale for their particular program of exercise or physical activity promotion (e.g., Rimmer 1999; Zemper et al. 2003; Block et al. 2005; Kosma et al. 2005). As noted previously, there is generally more support for an overall health benefit of physical activity in the able-bodied population including evidence for its role in the prevention of chronic disease (US Department of Health and Human Services 1996; Warburton et al. 2006; Kruk 2007). The present section is intended to outline the evidence that exists in SCI for specific interventions involving physical activity in preventing or mitigating the effects of various secondary health conditions. Specific secondary conditions addressed include those associated with maintaining or enhancing cardiovascular health and bone health as well as preventing or mitigating disability associated with respiratory complications, pain, spasticity and periodic leg movements.

The intent of this section is to bring the information about physical activity associated with various secondary health conditions into one place, as most of these secondary conditions comprise individual chapters with SCIRE. Therefore, we have selected to simply reference the existing chapters that contain information about physical activity interventions and to also bring forward the conclusions (i.e.,evidence statements and bottom-line conclusions) from these chapters so the reader will gain a sense of the degree of evidence across these various conditions. The reader is encouraged to examine the referenced chapter for surrounding discussion and more information concerning the various studies and details about the specific interventions comprising the evidence. Of note, many of the therapies associated with upper limb or lower limb management involve therapeutic exercise programming (often associated with physical or occupational therapy) and for these we simply refer the reader to SCIRE Chapters: Upper Limb Rehabilitation Following Spinal Cord Injury (Connolly et al. 2010) and Lower Limb Rehabilitation Following Spinal Cord Injury (Lam et al. 2010) respectively.

Physical Activity and Cardiovascular Health

Cardiovascular disease, when considered after the first year post-injury within the US Model Systems database, has been acknowledged as the leading cause of death in persons with SCI, supplanting respiratory complications and previous to that septicaemia (Whiteneck et al. 1992; DeVivo et al. 1999). Cardiovascular disease is currently also the leading cause of death in the able-bodied population. A recent review by Myers et al. (2007) noted that there is a significantly high prevalence of cardiovascular disease in persons with SCI with rates of symptomatic cardiovascular disease in SCI of 30%–50% in comparison to 5%–10% in the general able-bodied population. Physical activity interventions comprise a significant part of the strategy in dealing with cardiovascular disease and the reader is referred to SCIRE Chapter: Cardiovascular Health and Exercise Following Spinal Cord Injury (Warburton et al. 2010) for more information on this topic. In the following section, we present those specific evidence-based statements and bottom-line conclusions from this chapter related to physical activity.

Conclusions - From SCIRE: Cardiovascular Health and Exercise Following SCI

Exercise Rehabilitation and Cardiovascular Fitness

Treadmill training

  • There is level 4 evidence (Ditor et al. 2005a) that body-weight support treadmill training (BWSTT) improves cardiac autonomic balance in persons with incomplete tetraplegia.
  • There is level 4 evidence (de Carvalho and Cliquet 2005) that BWSTT can lead to improvements in cardiac autonomic balance in a subset of individuals with motor-complete SCI who respond to ambulation with moderate-to-large increases in heart rate.
  • Level 4 evidence (Ditor et al. 2005b) indicates that BWSTT can improve arterial compliance in individuals with motor-complete SCI.
  • There is level 2 evidence (de Carvalho et al. 2006) that neuromuscular electrical stimulation gait training can increase metabolic and cardiorespiratory responses in persons with complete tetraplegia.
  • There is limited evidence that BWSTT can improve indicators of cardiovascular health in individuals with complete and incomplete SCI.

Upper Extremity Exercise

  • There is level 1 evidence (Davis et al. 1987) that moderate intensity aerobic arm training (performed 20–60 min/day, three days/week for at least 6-8 weeks) is effective in improving the aerobic capacity and exercise tolerance of persons with SCI.
  • There is level 1 evidence (De Groot et al. 2003) that vigorous intensity (70%–80% heart rate reserve) exercise leads to greater improvements in aerobic capacity than moderate intensity (50-60% heart rate reserve) exercise.
  • The relative importance of changes in cardiac function and the ability to extract oxygen at the periphery in persons with SCI after aerobic training remains to be determined.
  • Tetraplegics and paraplegics can improve their cardiovascular fitness and physical work capacity through aerobic exercise training of moderate intensity, performed 20-60 min day, at least three times per week for a minimum of six to eight weeks. Resistance training at a moderate intensity at least two days per week also appears to be appropriate for the rehabilitation of persons with SCI. It remains to be determined the optimal exercise intervention for improving cardiovascular fitness.

Functional electrical stimulation (FES)– Lower Limb Cycle Ergometry and Hybrid (Upper and Lower Limb) and Other Electrically-Assisted Training Programs

  • There is level 4 evidence from pre-post studies that FES training performed for a minimum of three days per week for two months can be effective for improving musculoskeletal fitness, the oxidative potential of muscle, exercise tolerance, and cardiovascular fitness.
  • There is level 4 evidence that FES training is effective in improving exercise cardiac function in persons with SCI.
  • Based on the changes observed in VO2max and findings from able-bodied individuals a consensus (level 5; Expert Opinion) was derived stating that aerobic training is effective in improving the ability to extract oxygen at the periphery in persons with SCI.
  • Interventions that involve FES training a minimum of 3 days per week for 2 months can improve muscular endurance, oxidative metabolism, exercise tolerance, and cardiovascular fitness.

Glucose Homeostasis

  • There is level 1 (De Groot et al. 2003) and level 4 (Chilibeck et al. 1999; Mohr et al. 2001; Jeon et al. 2002) evidence that both aerobic and FES training (approximately 20–30 min/day, three days/week for eight weeks or more) are effective in improving glucose homeostasis in persons with SCI.
  • There is level 4 evidence that the changes in glucose homeostasis after aerobic or FES training are clinically significant for the prevention and/or treatment of type 2 diabetes.
  • Aerobic and FES exercise training may lead to clinically significant improvements in glucose homeostasis in persons with SCI. Preliminary evidence indicates that a minimum of 30 min of moderate intensity training on 3 days per week is required to achieve and/or maintain the benefits from exercise training.

Lipid Lipoprotein Profiles

  • There is level 1 evidence (De Groot et al. 2003) to suggest that aerobic exercise training programs (performed at a moderate to vigorous intensity 20-30 min/day, 3 days per week for 8 weeks) are effective in improving the lipid lipoprotein profiles of persons with SCI.
  • Preliminary evidence (level 4; Solomonow et al. 1997) also indicates that FES training (3 hours/week, for 14 weeks) may improve lipid lipoprotein profiles in SCI.
  • Aerobic and FES exercise training may lead to improvements in lipid lipoprotein profile that are clinically relevant for the at risk SCI population. The optimal training program for changes in lipid lipoprotein profile remains to be determined. However, a minimal aerobic exercise intensity of 70% of heart rate reserve on most days of the week appears to be a good general recommendation for improving lipid lipoprotein profile in persons with SCI.

Physical Activity and Respiratory Complications

Other than death due to external causes (e.g., motor vehicle accident, violence), respiratory complications, have consistently been among the two leading causes of death in persons with SCI when considered after the first year post-injury, and the highest cause of death within the first year post-injury, over the past 35 years within the US Model Systems database (DeVivo et al. 1999). As noted in SCIRE Chapter: Respiratory Management Following Spinal Cord Injury (Sheel et al. 2008):

“The lungs and airways do not change appreciably in response to exercise training. It is likely that exercise is not sufficiently stressful to warrant an adaptive response. This may be even more so when considering the small muscle mass used in wheelchair propulsion or arm cranking exercise. On the other hand, respiratory muscles are both metabolically and structurally plastic and they respond to exercise training. ... Exercise training may influence the control of breathing and respiratory sensations (i.e., dyspnea). It is generally accepted that exercise training results in a lower minute ventilation at any given absolute oxygen consumption or power output. This is likely due to a reduction in one or more of the mechanisms (neural and/or humoral) purported to cause the hyperpnea (increased respiratory rate) associated with exercise. As such, the positive effects of exercise training in SCI may reside in an increase in respiratory muscle strength and endurance as well as a reduced ventilatory demand during exercise.”

For more information about these and other interventions related to exercise and muscle activation related to respiratory complications, the reader is referred to SCIRE Chapter 8 - Respiratory Management Following Spinal Cord Injury (Sheel et al. 2008). In the following section, we present those specific evidence-based statements and bottom-line conclusions from this chapter related to physical activity.

Conclusions - From SCIRE Respiratory Management Following SCI

Exercise Training

  • For exercise training to improve respiratory function the training intensity must be relatively high (70-80% of maximum heart rate) performed three times per week for six weeks. Ideal training regimes have not been identified.

Inspiratory Muscle Training

  • There is level 4 evidence based on several studies to support inspiratory muscle training as an intervention that might decrease dyspnea and improve inspiratory muscle function in some people with SCI.
  • There is limited evidence that inspiratory muscle training improves respiratory muscle strength or endurance in people with SCI.

Physical Activity and Bone Health

Osteoporosis is a condition characterized by low bone mass and deterioration of the skeletal system and is often cited as a secondary complication associated with SCI (Giangregorio and McCartney 2006; Jiang et al. 2006). This bone deterioration results in skeletal fragility and leads to an increased risk of fractures. Physical activity interventions have been suggested as potential strategies for both prevention and treatment of loss of bone mineral density and the reader is referred to SCIRE Chapter: Bone Health Following Spinal Cord Injury (Ashe et al. 2010) for more information on this topic. In the following section, we present those specific evidence-based statements and bottom-line conclusions from this chapter related to physical activity.

Conclusions - From SCIRE Bone Health Following SCI

Non-Pharmacologic Therapy: Rehabilitation Modalities - Prevention (within 12 months of injury)

  • There is level 1 evidence (from one RCT) (Warden et al. 2001) that short-term (6 weeks) ultrasound is not effective for treating bone loss after SCI.
  • There is level 2 evidence (from 1 non-randomized prospective controlled trial) (Shields et al. 2006) that ES reduced the decline in BMD in the leg.
  • There is level 2 evidence (from 1 non-randomized prospective controlled trial) (Eser et al. 2003) that FES-cycling did not improve or maintain bone at the tibial midshaft in the acute phase.
  • There is level 4 evidence (from 1 pre-post study) (Giangregorio et al. 2005) that walking and level 1 evidence (from 1 RCT) (Ben et al. 2005) that standing in the acute phase did not differ from immobilization for bone loss at the tibia.
  • Short term (6 weeks) therapeutic ultrasound is not effective for preventing bone loss after SCI.
  • FES-cycling does not improve or maintain bone at the tibial midshaft in the acute phase but may increase/maintain lower extremity BMD the longer time since injury.

Non-Pharmacologic Therapy: Rehabilitation Modalities - Treatment – Electrical Stimulation

  • There is level 2 evidence (from 1 prospective controlled trial) (Belanger et al. 2000) that electrical stimulation either increased or maintained BMD over the stimulated areas.
  • Electrical stimulation can maintain or increase BMD over the stimulated areas.

Non-Pharmacologic Therapy: Rehabilitation Modalities – Treatment - FES Cycle Ergometry

  • There is level 4 evidence (from 1 pre-post study) (Chen et al. 2005) that 6 months of FES cycle ergometry increased regional lower extremity BMD over areas stimulated.

  • Six months of FES cycle ergometry may increase lower extremity BMD over areas stimulated.

Non-Pharmacologic Therapy: Rehabilitation Modalities – Treatment - Standing and Walking

  • There is inconclusive evidence for Reciprocating Gait Orthosis, long leg braces, passive standing or self-reported physical activity as a treatment for low bone mass
  • There is inconclusive evidence for Reciprocating Gait Orthosis, long leg braces, passive standing or self-reported physical activity as a treatment for low bone mass.

Physical Activity and Pain

Pain is a frequently noted complication in persons with SCI. Although reports vary widely, given historical variation in pain classification and differences in rating pain severity across the various pain categories (i.e., at-, above- or below-lesion neuropathic pain; visceral; musculoskeletal) it is generally established that an average of about two-thirds of people with SCI report some form of pain and nearly one-third of these rate their pain as severe (Siddall and Loeser 2001). Physical activity interventions have been linked to mitigating some of the effects of chronic pain in SCI and the reader is referred to SCIRE Chapter: Pain Following Spinal Cord Injury (Teasell et al. 2010) for more information on this topic. In the following section, we present those specific evidence-based statements and bottom-line conclusions from this chapter related to physical activity.

Conclusions - From SCIRE: Pain Following SCI

Exercises for Post-SCI Pain

  • There is level 1 evidence from a single RCT (Martin Ginis et al. 2003) that a regular exercise program significantly reduces post-SCI pain.

  • Regular exercise reduces post-SCI pain.

Exercises for Shoulder Pain

  • There is level 2 evidence (from one RCT and one PCT) that a shoulder exercise protocol reduces the intensity of shoulder pain post-SCI.
  • There is level 4 evidence that the MAGIC wheels 2-gear wheelchair results in less shoulder pain.
  • Shoulder exercise protocol reduces post-SCI shoulder pain intensity.

Physical Activity and Spasticity

Spasticity, defined as “disordered sensori-motor control, resulting from an upper motor neurone lesion, presenting as intermittent or sustained involuntary activation of muscle” (Pandyan et al. 2005), is a frequent condition associated with SCI with as many as 78% of persons with chronic SCI reporting spasticity (Adams and Hicks 2005). Spasticity may not worsen with age or time, however uncontrolled spasticity has been suggested as having an impact on emotional adaptation, dependency, secondary health problems and environmental integration (Krause 2007). Physical activity interventions have demonstrated to reduce spasticity in SCI and the reader is referred to SCIRE: Spasticity Following Spinal Cord Injury (Hsieh et al. 2010) for more information on this topic. In the following section, we present those specific evidence-based statements and bottom-line conclusions from this chapter related to physical activity.

Conclusions - From SCIRE:Spasticity Following SCI

Interventions Based on Passive Movement or Stretching

  • There is level 1 evidence from a single study that passive ankle movements may not reduce lower limb muscle spasticity in persons with initial mild spasticity.
  • There is level 2 evidence from a single study supported by level 4 evidence from another study that hippotherapy may reduce lower limb muscle spasticity immediately following an individual session.
  • There is limited level 1 evidence from a single study that a combination of a 6 week course of neural facilitation techniques (Bobath, Rood and Brunnstrom approaches) and Baclofen may reduce lower limb muscle spasticity with a concomitant increase in ADL independence. More research is needed to determine the relative contributions of these therapies.
  • There is level 4 evidence from a single study that rhythmic, passive movements may result in a short-term reduction in spasticity.
  • There is level 4 evidence from a single study that externally applied forces or passive muscle stretch as are applied in assisted standing programs may result in short-term reduction in spasticity. This is supported by individual case studies and anecdotal reports from survey-based research.
  • Hippotherapy may result in short-term reductions in spasticity.
  • A combination of neural facilitation techniques and Baclofen may reduce spasticity.
  • Rhythmic passive movements may produce short-term reductions in spasticity.
  • Prolonged standing or other methods of producing muscle stretch may result in reduced spasticity.

Interventions Based on Active Movement (Including FES-assisted Movement

  • There is level 2 evidence from a single study (Kesiktas et al. 2004) that hydrotherapy is effective in producing a short-term reduction in spasticity.
  • There is level 2 evidence from a single study that single bouts of FES-assisted cycling ergometry and similar passive cycling movements are effective in reducing spasticity over the short-term with FES more effective than passive movement.
  • There is level 4 evidence from three studies (Granat et al. 1993; Thoumie et al. 1995; Mirbagheri et al. 2002) that a program of FES-assisted walking acts to reduce ankle spasticity in the short-term (i.e., <24 hours).
  • There is no evidence describing the length and time course of the treatment effect related to spasticity for hydrotherapy or FES-assisted walking.
  • Active exercise interventions such as hydrotherapy and (FES) functional electrical stimulation-assisted walking may produce short-term reductions in spasticity.

Physical Activity and Periodic Leg Movements

Restless legs syndrome and the associated phenomena of periodic limb movement have been noted to occur relatively frequently in persons with SCI (de Mello et al. 1996; Lee et al. 1996). In particular, periodic leg movements are characterized by rapid leg movements during sleep, especially ankle dorsiflexion combined with extension of the large toe and less frequently knee and/or hip flexion. These may occur for several minutes to several hours and may be associated with insomnia and daytime somnolence and the inherent effects this can have on one’s quality of life.

Table 4 Physical Activity and Periodic Limb Movements

Discussion

Following 2 pilot studies showing positive effects with either a single session (de Mello et al. 1996) or multiple sessions (de Mello et al. 2002) of exercise training, de Mello and colleagues conducted a prospective controlled trial comparing the effect of 30 days of initial L-dopa or placebo treatment versus 45 days of three/week 30 minute aerobic arm ergometry exercise training sessions in reducing the incidence of periodic limb movements during sleep (de Mello et al. 2004). Participants were all male, with complete chronic paraplegia (AIS A, lesion levels between T7-T12) with participants crossing-over from 1 treatment to the next. The incidence of periodic limb movements was determined with polysomnographic analysis conducted as part of a sleep study and the effect of each treatment was noted relative to a baseline period. There was a 15 day washout period between the drug and exercise treatments to limit any carry-over effects. Both treatments were equally effective in reducing the amount of periodic limb movements such that the authors suggested a physical activity intervention as the first line of treatment and treatment with dopaminergic agonists to be reserved for persons who prove refractory to the exercise approach (De Mello et al. 2004).

Conclusion

  • There is level 2 evidence from a single study and supported by two additional pre-post trials that a 45 day period of 3/week 30 minute aerobic exercise sessions (arm cycle ergometry) is equally effective as L-dopa in reducing night-time periodic limb movements in persons with complete paraplegia.
  • Aerobic exercise is effective in reducing night-time periodic limb movements in persons with complete paraplegia.

Increasing Physical Activity Participation in SCI

It is generally accepted that physical activity is associated with numerous physical and psychological benefits for both the able-bodied and for persons with SCI. The previous section outlined numerous investigations providing evidence that various forms of physical activity and exercise programming are effective for a variety of SCI-related issues. However, more research is needed to determine the effect of specific parameters such as mode, duration, frequency and intensity to more fully delineate the specific characteristics that would guide exercise prescription for individuals with SCI. There are even fewer studies that are directed towards investigating interventions that are designed to increase participation in physical activity and also that provide the background information needed to effectively design these interventions. Even though it seems obvious and is generally assumed that participation in physical activity is severely limited in persons with SCI, the research base on existing levels of physical activity participation and the specific barriers that persons with SCI must overcome to participate is lacking.

It should be noted that determinations of participation levels and investigations of barriers to participation are not amenable to experimental investigation and typically do not involve an intervention, and therefore comprise subject areas which are typically not addressed according to SCIRE methodology. However, descriptions of the observational studies examining participation levels and barriers to participation are included here as an understanding of these factors is critical for rehabilitation care providers and health promoters to successfully develop and apply physical activity-promoting interventions directed toward persons with SCI. Finally, the effectiveness of interventions that promote physical activity participation of persons with SCI is assessed from the existing literature.

Physical Activity Participation Levels in SCI

Although it is often stated that people with SCI are the most physically inactive segment of society, surprisingly few studies have actually measured physical activity in the SCI population. This lack of research is partly due to the fact that, until recently (Latimer et al., 2006a), there was no valid and reliable measure of physical activity for people with SCI that could be used in large-scale studies. Although several smaller studies (i.e., n < 50) have reported on physical activity levels among persons with SCI, given the considerable heterogeneity of the SCI population, the results of these studies are not necessarily generalizable. Thus, for the purpose of this review, we have focused only on larger-sample investigations.

Estimates of physical activity are affected by the approaches used to define and measure physical activity in a given study. In the reviewed studies, physical activity has been defined both narrowly (e.g., participation in sports activities), and more broadly to capture participation in all activities requiring physical exertion (e.g., leisure-time physical activity, activities of daily living), and even some “exercise” activities that are not at all exerting (e.g., relaxation exercises). With regard to measurement, all of the larger studies utilized self-report measures of physical activity, with considerable variability in the types and amounts of physical activity information collected. This information has ranged from simply the rate of participation in the sample, to more comprehensive data on the types of physical activities performed, and in some cases, participation frequency, duration, or intensity.

Table 5 Physical Activity Participation in the SCI Population

 

Discussion

Physical activity participation rates have been reported in three studies -- two Canadian, and one British. Notably, Martin Ginis and colleagues have reported results from a large cross-sectional study (n=695) based in Ontario, Canada designed to accurately measure the types, amounts, and intensities of LTPA (LTPA; defined as any physical activity that people choose to do during their spare time) performed by people with SCI (Martin Ginis et al. 2008; Martin Ginis et al. 2010a; Martin Ginis et al. 2010b). In these reports, which describe the methods and the baseline data from a prospective, longitudinal cohort study over 1.5 years, the initial overall participation rate was found to be 49.9% with these participants reporting a mean of 27.1 ± 49.4 minutes of LTPA a day, whereas 50.1% of participants reported no LTPA whatsoever (Martin Ginis et al. 2010a). Of those participants reporting >0 min/day of LTPA (n=347), there was a mean of 55.2 ± 59.1 min/day of LTPA at a mild intensity or greater with a median of 33.3 min/day (Martin Ginis et al. 2010b). Being male and greater than 11 years post-injury was associated with inactivity while having motor complete paraplegia and being a manual wheelchair user was associated with the most minutes of daily LTPA (Martin Ginis et al. 2010a). Although there was considerable variability among the various activities preferred by individuals, most participants reporting LPTA did activities at a moderate level of intensity than mild or heavy and the 3 activities most frequently reported were resistance training, aerobic exercise and wheeling. The activities reported as being performed for the longest durations were craftsmanship and sports activities (Martin Ginis et al. 2010b).

In the other Canadian study (Carpenter et al. 2007), 75% of respondents reported participating in “fitness activities” which included breathing and relaxation exercises (i.e., activities that do not necessarily require physical exertion or have fitness-enhancing benefits). The British study (Tasiemski et al. 2005) defined physical activity as involvement in sports and reported participation rates of just 47%. The large between-studies differences in participation rates likely reflect the broader range of activities measured in the Carpenter et al. (2007) study (i.e., activities that are not typically considered physical activities).

Information beyond simple participation rates was reported in two studies (Latimer et al. 2006a; Tasiemski et al. 2005) in addition to the aforementioned information noted by Martin Ginis and colleagues (2010a, 2010b). Tasiemski et al. (2005) reported that the most commonly practiced sports were swimming, archery, weight-training, basketball, and table tennis. Of those who were active, about half spent 3-6 hours/week engaged in sports and the remainder were active for < 2 hours/week. Latimer et al. (2006a) reported that on average, people with SCI spent 30 minutes/day engaged in LTPA and 213 min/day on activities of daily living that required at least mild intensity physical exertion. There was, however, tremendous variability in the amount of daily activity reported. Most of the LTPA was performed at mild and moderate intensities, and most of the activities of daily living were performed at a mild intensity. In general, men engaged in more LTPA than women, and younger people did more LTPA than older people. There were no differences in LTPA as a function of lesion level or completeness. It should be noted that the Latimer et al. (2006a) study was designed to validate the measure of physical activity for the SCI population (i.e., PARA-SCI) to be used in later larger-scale studies (i.e., Martin Ginis et al. 2010a; Martin Ginis et al. 2010b) rather than to measure LTPA in the SCI population. As a result, the study design and potential sampling biases may undermine the generalizability of their findings to the larger SCI population.

Conclusions

  • There is tremendous variability in the number of minutes of daily LTPA reported by persons with SCI.
  • There is level 5 evidence from two large-sample studies from separate jurisdictions (i.e., Canada and UK) that approximately 50% of persons with SCI devote some time per week to sports, exercise, and other forms of LTPA.
  • There is level 5 evidence from a single study that a person with SCI participates in some form of LPTA for an average of about an hour per day (median ~ 30 minutes) when considering only the approximately 50% of people with SCI who are not inactive.
  • There is level 5 evidence from a single study that when physical activity is defined in terms of sports participation, the majority of people with SCI are considered inactive.
  • There is level 5 evidence from a single study that indicates that most daily physical activity is accumulated in the form of activities of daily living when physical activity is defined in terms of participation in any activity that requires physical exertion.
  • There is tremendous variability in the amount of physical activity performed by people living with SCI. A large segment of the population does not engage in any leisure-time physical activity whatsoever.

Barriers to Physical Activity Participation in the SCI Population

The inactive lifestyle of individuals with SCI is a serious functional and health liability.  Consequently, developing effective interventions to promote physical activity should be a research and public health priority (Rimmer 1999). In order to tailor interventions to the needs of individuals with SCI it is necessary to understand the factors affecting their participation in physical activity.

Among adult populations of persons with disabilities, frequently cited barriers impeding participation include: intrapersonal barriers (i.e., personal factors such as health concerns, motivation, and knowledge), systemic barriers (i.e., obstacles such as program costs and accessibility resulting from infrastructure and policy preventing participation or access),  attitudinal barriers (i.e, stigma and negative stereotypes held by persons who are not impaired), and expertise barriers (i.e., gaps in practitioners’ knowledge and skill to effectively prescribe and supervise physical activity for adults with disability). The objective of this section is to examine the prominence of these barriers specifically in the SCI population. Indeed, barriers are a critical factor affecting participation in the SCI population (Latimer et al. 2004). For example, among a group of individuals with SCI exercising at an adapted exercise facility, participation rates were lowest among people experiencing more physical symptoms related to their injury (i.e., intrapersonal barriers; Ditor et al. 2003). 

Table 6 Barriers to Physical Activity Participation in SCI

 

Discussion

This series of four observational (level 5) studies provide an indication of frequently encountered barriers affecting physical activity participation in the SCI population (Martin et al. 2002; Scelza et al. 2005; Vissers et al. 2008; Kehn and Kroll 2009). Although all types of barriers as described above (i.e., intrapersonal, systemic, attitudinal, and expertise) were cited as obstacles to physical activity participation, intrapersonal, systemic, and expertise barriers were the most prominent and consistent. Further research should determine which of these barriers are most influential and modifiable. In turn, practitioners and researchers should direct their effort towards developing interventions to alleviate these key barriers.     

Interestingly, two of the studies suggest that the physical activity barriers that people with SCI encounter vary depending on lesion level and time post injury. People with tetraplegia reported being more concerned about health conditions preventing exercise and exercise being too difficult than individuals with paraplegia (Scelza et al. 2005). Moreover, participants in the study by Vissers et al. (2008) indicated that they encountered more barriers to participation such as a need for more information and opportunity to participate in sport soon after discharge compared to later. Together these findings suggest that strategies for overcoming barriers to physical activity participation may be most effective when they are individualized to suit specific needs.

Conclusion

  • There is level 5 evidence from four studies to suggest that individuals with SCI encounter a variety of factors that impede physical activity participation. Among these factors, the most frequently cited barriers include: (a) intrapersonal barriers such as perceived limited return on investment, health concerns and a lack of motivation, energy and time, (b) systemic barriers such as a lack of accessible facilities or unavailability of personal assistants, transportation difficulties, and program costs, and (c) expertise barriers such as a lack of knowledge about physical activity prescription and client referral processes.
  • Interventions are needed to help alleviate these obstacles. Further research must determine the most influential and modifiable barriers that would be optimal targets for intervention.
  • Individuals with SCI encounter numerous impediments to physical activity participation including intrapersonal, systemic, and expertise barriers. Interventions are needed to help people with SCI manage these barriers.

Effectiveness of Interventions to Increase Physical Activity Participation in SCI

The evidence that a large segment of the SCI population does not engage in any leisure-time physical activity whatsoever emphasizes the need for effective interventions to help people with SCI to become more physically active. In the SCI population, the majority of physical activity intervention studies are efficacy trials establishing the effects of physical activity on specific health outcomes. Few studies have examined strategies for increasing physical activity participation in this population. Thus, it is not surprising that programs and information to increase physical activity are two of the services most desired but least available to people with SCI (Hart et al. 1996; Boyd and Bardak 2004). To begin addressing this gap, this section reviews the physical activity intervention studies that include a measure of physical activity participation as a study outcome.

In the general population, three types of physical activity interventions have strong evidence of effectiveness:  (1) Informational interventions that focus on delivering information to change knowledge and attitudes about the benefits of and opportunities for physical activity (e.g., a community-based media campaign), (2) Behavioural interventions that focus on teaching behavioural skills to promote physical activity participation (e.g., goal-setting),  and (3) Environmental and policy interventions that focus on changing the physical environment, social networks, organizational norms and policies to enable physical activity participation (Kahn et al., 2002).  Our review of physical activity interventions in the SCI population focuses solely on behavioural interventions.   This narrow scope is due to the complete lack of research testing the effectiveness of informational and environmental interventions in the SCI population.

Table 7 Interventions Promoting Physical Activity Participation in SCI

Discussion

Although the sample sizes (n’s = 12-54) are small and the research methods are limited, the findings from the four published studies promoting physical activity for individuals with SCI are encouraging. Each of the level 1 and 2 studies (Arbour-Nicitopoulos et al. 2009; Latimer et al. 2006b; Zemper et al. 2003) reported a significant increase in physical activity participation following an intervention. The level 4 study (Warms et al. 2004) indicated a promising trend in which the majority of participants increased their participation over the course of the intervention. 

In addition to providing evidence that physical activity participation in the SCI population is amenable to change, these studies begin to provide initial insight into essential intervention elements.  All four studies used an established theoretical framework to guide the intervention content. Specifically, Zemper et al. (2003) developed their intervention based on self-efficacy theory (Bandura, 1986), Warms et al. (2004) applied the transtheoretical model (Prochaska et al. 1992), and Latimer et al. (2006b) and Arbour-Nicitopoulos et al. (2009) used the action phase model (Gollwitzer, 1993), with the latter study also incorporating coping planning methods (See Table 9 for descriptions of these models and underlying concepts). The application of these theories in intervention development ensured that important determinants of physical activity behaviour were being targeted thus, boosting the odds of behaviour change. 

Table 8  Descriptions of Theoretical Frameworks and Underlying Concepts

From the studies by Latimer et al. (2006b) and Arbour-Nicitopoulos et al. (2009), we begin to gain an understanding of the impact of a specific intervention strategy on physical activity participation. Latimer et al. (2006b) demonstrated that assisting persons with the creation of implementation intentions is a simple and efficacious intervention technique. Arbour-Nicitopoulos et al. (2009) extended these observations by incorporating a coping planning strategy as part of systematic action planning to circumvent anticipated barriers with self-regulatory strategies. Because the studies by Zemper et al. (2003) and Warms et al. (2004) delivered multifaceted interventions including education, goal setting, and barrier management counselling, the isolated impact of each of these intervention strategies remains unknown. 

Conclusion

  • There is level 1 evidence from a single RCT and supported by two low quality RCTs and by an additional level 4 study that the physical activity behaviour of individuals with SCI is amenable to change, and that theory-based interventions may be a means of generating this change.
  • There is level 1 evidence from a single study that indicates that coping planning as part of action planning is an effective intervention technique for promoting physical activity participation in the SCI population.
  • There is level 2 evidence from a single study that indicates that facilitating the formation of implementation intentions may be an effective intervention technique for promoting physical activity participation in the SCI population.
  • More research is needed to identify additional, specific behavioural interventions that are effective in the SCI population. Furthermore, researchers should begin to consider the impact of other types of interventions including informational and environmental interventions.
  • Behavioural interventions promoting physical activity in the SCI population may lead to increased levels of physical activity participation.

Summary

  • There is level 2 evidence from a single study with support from several level 4 studies that an appropriately-configured program of functional electrical stimulation of lower limb muscle in persons with SCI produces muscle adaptations such as increasing individual muscle fibre and overall muscle size and may result in the prevention and/or recovery of muscle atrophy.
  • There is level 2 evidence from a single study with support from several level 4 studies that an appropriately-configured program of functional electrical stimulation of lower limb muscle in persons with SCI results in an increase in muscle fibre types with more aerobic (endurance) capabilities, (most notably a shift in type IIx to type IIa muscle fibres).
  • There is level 1 evidence from a single RCT with support from a single level 4 study that functional electrical stimulation-assisted upper limb cycle ergometry is capable of producing significant increases in upper limb muscle strength in persons with tetraplegia.
  • There is level 2 evidence from a single RCT that voluntary upper limb cycle ergometry is capable of producing significant increases in upper limb muscle strength in triceps, biceps and anterior deltoid in persons with SCI.
  • There is level 1 evidence from a single RCT that voluntary upper limb resistance exercise is effective in increasing upper limb muscle strength in persons with paraplegia.
  • There is conflicting level 1 evidence across two RCTs that electrical stimulation-assisted resistance training of paretic wrist extensors or flexors increases strength and fatigue resistance in persons with tetraplegia.
  • There is level 4 evidence from three studies that suggest that body-weight supported treadmill training in persons with SCI produces muscle adaptations of increasing individual muscle fibre size and overall muscle size and may result in the prevention and/or recovery of muscle atrophy.
  • There is level 4 evidence from several pre-post studies that circuit resistance training and other forms of resistance training combined with other approaches may increase upper limb muscle strength in triceps, biceps and anterior deltoid in persons with tetraplegia.
  • There is level 2 evidence from a low quality RCT that either 16 weeks of physical exercise therapy alone or a combination of 2, 8 week blocks of this therapy, neuromuscular stimulation or EMG biofeedback may enhance self-care and mobility scores.
  • There is level 2 evidence from a single prospective, controlled trial that a twice weekly swimming program conducted over 4 months immediately following rehabilitation discharge may enhance motor FIM scores. This finding of exercise-related enhancement of functional outcomes is generally supported by 3 additional level 4 studies that employ different modes of physical activity associated with either increases to overall FIM scores or improved performance of ADLs.
  • Prospective, controlled trials are required to better determine the relationship of physical activity programming and functional benefits. There is no evidence for a relationship between specific program parameters (e.g., mode, intensity, frequency, duration) that might be necessary to achieve particular benefits.
  • Based on level 1 and 2 evidence from 4 studies (note that these studies draw on a common data set), exercise is an effective intervention for improving two aspects of SWB--quality of life and depressive symptomatology. For the most part, the level 4 and 5 evidence also supports this conclusion.
  • Emerging data from these studies suggest that changes in stress and pain may be the mechanisms underlying the effects of exercise on quality of life and depression. Further research is needed to examine other aspects of SWB in relation to physical activity.
  • There is level 4 evidence (Ditor et al. 2005a) that body-weight support treadmill training (BWSTT) improves cardiac autonomic balance in persons with incomplete tetraplegia.
  • There is level 4 evidence (de Carvalho and Cliquet 2005) that BWSTT can lead to improvements in cardiac autonomic balance in a subset of individuals with motor-complete SCI who respond to ambulation with moderate-to-large increases in heart rate.
  • Level 4 evidence (Ditor et al. 2005b) indicates that BWSTT can improve arterial compliance in individuals with motor-complete SCI.
  • There is level 2 evidence (de Carvalho et al. 2006) that neuromuscular electrical stimulation gait training can increase metabolic and cardiorespiratory responses in persons with complete tetraplegia.
  • There is level 1 evidence (Davis et al. 1987) that moderate intensity aerobic arm training (performed 20–60 min/day, three days/week for at least 6-8 weeks) is effective in improving the aerobic capacity and exercise tolerance of persons with SCI.
  • There is level 1 evidence (De Groot et al. 2003) that vigorous intensity (70%–80% heart rate reserve) exercise leads to greater improvements in aerobic capacity than moderate intensity (50-60% heart rate reserve) exercise.
  • The relative importance of changes in cardiac function and the ability to extract oxygen at the periphery in persons with SCI after aerobic training remains to be determined.
  • There is level 4 evidence from pre-post studies that FES training performed for a minimum of three days per week for two months can be effective for improving musculoskeletal fitness, the oxidative potential of muscle, exercise tolerance, and cardiovascular fitness.
  • There is level 4 evidence that FES training is effective in improving exercise cardiac function in persons with SCI.
  • Based on the changes observed in VO2max and findings from able-bodied individuals a consensus (level 5; Expert Opinion) was derived stating that aerobic training is effective in improving the ability to extract oxygen at the periphery in persons with SCI.
  • There is level 1 (De Groot et al. 2003) and level 4 (Chilibeck et al. 1999; Mohr et al. 2001; Jeon et al. 2002) evidence that both aerobic and FES training (approximately 20–30 min/day, three days/week for eight weeks or more) are effective in improving glucose homeostasis in persons with SCI.
  • There is level 4 evidence that the changes in glucose homeostasis after aerobic or FES training are clinically significant for the prevention and/or treatment of type 2 diabetes.
  • There is level 1 evidence (De Groot et al. 2003) to suggest that aerobic exercise training programs (performed at a moderate to vigorous intensity 20-30 min/day, 3 days per week for 8 weeks) are effective in improving the lipid lipoprotein profiles of persons with SCI.
  • Preliminary evidence (level 4; Solomonow et al. 1997) also indicates that FES training (3 hours/week, for 14 weeks) may improve lipid lipoprotein profiles in SCI.
  • There is level 2 evidence (based on 1 prospective controlled trial) (de Carvalho et al. 2006) and level 4 evidence (based on 4 pre-post studies) (Silva et al. 1998; Sutbeyaz et al., 2005; Le Foll-de-Moro et al. 2005; Fukuoka et al. 2006;) to support exercise training as an intervention that might improve resting and exercising respiratory function in people with SCI.
  • There is level 4 evidence based on several studies to support inspiratory muscle training as an intervention that might decrease dyspnea and improve inspiratory muscle function in some people with SCI.
  • There is level 1 evidence (from one RCT) (Warden et al. 2001) that short-term (6 weeks) ultrasound is not effective for treating bone loss after SCI.
  • There is level 2 evidence (from 1 non-randomized prospective controlled trial) (Shields et al. 2006a) that ES reduced the decline in BMD in the leg.
  • There is level 2 evidence (from 1 non-randomized prospective controlled trial) (Eser et al. 2003) that FES-cycling did not improve or maintain bone at the tibial midshaft in the acute phase.
  • There is level 4 evidence (from 1 pre-post study) (Giangregorio et al. 2005) that walking and level 1 evidence (from 1 RCT) (Ben et al. 2005) that standing in the acute phase did not differ from immobilization for bone loss at the tibia.
  • There is level 2 evidence (from 1 prospective controlled trial) (Bélanger et al. 2000) that electrical stimulation either increased or maintained BMD over the stimulated areas.
  • There is level 4 evidence (from 1 pre-post study) (Chen et al. 2005) that 6 months of FES cycle ergometry increased regional lower extremity BMD over areas stimulated.
  • There is inconclusive evidence for Reciprocating Gait Orthosis, long leg braces, passive standing or self-reported physical activity as a treatment for low bone mass
  • There is level 1 evidence from a single RCT (Martin Ginis et al. 2003) that a regular exercise program significantly reduces post-SCI pain.
  • There is level 2 evidence (from one RCT and one PCT) that a shoulder exercise protocol reduces the intensity of shoulder pain post-SCI.

    There is level 4 evidence that the MAGIC wheels 2-gear wheelchair results in less shoulder pain.

    There is level 1 evidence from a single study that passive ankle movements may not reduce lower limb muscle spasticity in persons with initial mild spasticity.

  • There is level 2 evidence from a single study supported by level 4 evidence from another study that hippotherapy may reduce lower limb muscle spasticity immediately following an individual session.
  • There is limited level 1 evidence from a single study that a combination of a 6 week course of neural facilitation techniques (Bobath, Rood and Brunnstrom approaches) and Baclofen may reduce lower limb muscle spasticity with a concomitant increase in ADL independence. More research is needed to determine the relative contributions of these therapies.
  • There is level 4 evidence from a single study that rhythmic, passive movements may result in a short-term reduction in spasticity.

    There is level 4 evidence from a single study that externally applied forces or passive muscle stretch as are applied in assisted standing programs may result in short-term reduction in spasticity. This is supported by individual case studies and anecdotal reports from survey-based research.

  • There is level 2 evidence from a single study (Kesiktas et al. 2004) that hydrotherapy is effective in producing a short-term reduction in spasticity.
  • There is level 2 evidence from a single study that single bouts of FES-assisted cycling ergometry and similar passive cycling movements are effective in reducing spasticity over the short-term with FES more effective than passive movement.
  • There is level 4 evidence from three studies (Granat et al. 1993; Thoumie et al. 1995; Mirbagheri et al. 2002) that a program of FES-assisted walking acts to reduce ankle spasticity in the short-term (i.e., <24 hours).
  • There is no evidence describing the length and time course of the treatment effect related to spasticity for hydrotherapy or FES-assisted walking.
  • There is level 2 evidence from a single study and supported by two additional pre-post trials that a 45 day period of 3/week 30 minute aerobic exercise sessions (arm cycle ergometry) is equally effective as L-dopa in reducing night-time periodic limb movements in persons with complete paraplegia.
  • There is tremendous variability in the number of minutes of daily LTPA reported by persons with SCI. There is level 5 evidence from two large-sample studies from separate jurisdictions (i.e., Canada and UK) that approximately 50% of persons with SCI devote some time per week to sports, exercise, and other forms of LTPA.
  • There is level 5 evidence from a single study that a person with SCI participates in some form of LPTA for an average of about an hour per day (median ~ 30 minutes) when considering only the approximately 50% of people with SCI who are not inactive.
  • There is level 5 evidence from a single study that when physical activity is defined in terms of sports participation, the majority of people with SCI are considered inactive.
  • There is level 5 evidence from a single study that indicates that most daily physical activity is accumulated in the form of activities of daily living when physical activity is defined in terms of participation in any activity that requires physical exertion.
  • There is tremendous variability in the number of minutes of daily LTPA reported by persons with SCI. There is level 5 evidence from two studies that, although many report no activity whatsoever, there is a minority that devotes several hours per week to sports, exercise, and other forms of LTPA.
  • There is level 5 evidence from four studies to suggest that individuals with SCI encounter a variety of factors that impede physical activity participation. Among these factors, the most frequently cited barriers include: (a) intrapersonal barriers such as perceived limitd return on investment, health concerns and a lack of motivation, energy and time, (b) systemic barriers such as a lack of accessible facilities, or unavailability of personal assistants transportation difficulties, and program costs, and (c) expertise barriers such as a lack of knowledge about physical activity prescription and client referral processes.  
  • Interventions are needed to help alleviate these obstacles.  Further research must determine the most influential and modifiable barriers that would be optimal targets for intervention.
  • There is level 1 evidence from a single RCT and supported by two low quality RCTs and  by an additional level 4 study that the physical activity behaviour of individuals with SCI is amenable to change, and that theory-based interventions may be a means of generating this change.
  • There is level 1 evidence from a single study that indicates that coping planning as part of action planning is an effective intervention technique for promoting physical activity participation in the SCI population. 
  • There is level 2 evidence from a single study that indicates that facilitating the formation of implementation intentions may be an effective intervention technique for promoting physical activity participation in the SCI population. 
  • More research is needed to identify additional, specific behavioural interventions that are effective in the SCI population.  Furthermore, researchers should begin to consider the impact of other types of interventions including informational and environmental interventions. 
  • li>

Key Points

Physical Activity: Effects on Muscle Morphology,  Strength and Endurance in Persons with SCI

  • Various forms of exercise, most notably functional electrical stimulation of upper and lower limbs, body-weight support treadmill training and circuit resistance training, may be effective in increasing muscle strength and reducing muscle atrophy. The former two are more appropriate for those with greater muscle impairment.

Physical Activity and Functional Improvement Including Activities of Daily Living

  • Physical activity programming may be useful in improving functional outcomes such as performance of ADLs but there is very little information describing specific exercise parameters that would be most effective in this respect.

Physical Activity and Subjective Well-Being

  • Exercise is an effective strategy for improving at least two aspects of subjective well-being - depression and quality of life.

Physical Activity and Secondary Conditions

  • There is limited evidence that BWSTT can improve indicators of cardiovascular health in individuals with complete and incomplete SCI.
  • Tetraplegics and paraplegics can improve their cardiovascular fitness and physical work capacity through aerobic exercise training of moderate intensity, performed 20-60 min day, at least three times per week for a minimum of six to eight weeks. Resistance training at a moderate intensity at least two days per week also appears to be appropriate for the rehabilitation of persons with SCI. It remains to be determined the optimal exercise intervention for improving cardiovascular fitness.
  • Interventions that involve FES training a minimum of 3 days per week for 2 months can improve muscular endurance, oxidative metabolism, exercise tolerance, and cardiovascular fitness.
  • Aerobic and FES exercise training may lead to clinically significant improvements in glucose homeostasis in persons with SCI. Preliminary evidence indicates that a minimum of 30 min of moderate intensity training on 3 days per week is required to achieve and/or maintain the benefits from exercise training.
  • Aerobic and FES exercise training may lead to improvements in lipid lipoprotein profile that are clinically relevant for the at risk SCI population. The optimal training program for changes in lipid lipoprotein profile remains to be determined. However, a minimal aerobic exercise intensity of 70% of heart rate reserve on most days of the week appears to be a good general recommendation for improving lipid lipoprotein profile in persons with SCI.

Physical Activity and Respiratory Complications

  • For exercise training to improve respiratory function the training intensity must be relatively high (70-80% of maximum heart rate) performed three times per week for six weeks. Ideal training regimes have not been identified.
  • There is limited evidence that inspiratory muscle training improves respiratory muscle strength or endurance in people with SCI.


Physical Activity and Bone Health

  • Short term (6 weeks) therapeutic ultrasound is not effective for preventing bone loss after SCI.
  • FES-cycling does not improve or maintain bone at the tibial midshaft in the acute phase but may increase/maintain lower extremity BMD the longer time since injury.
  • Electrical stimulation can maintain or increase BMD over the stimulated areas.
  • Six months of FES cycle ergometry may increase lower extremity BMD over areas stimulated.
  • There is inconclusive evidence for Reciprocating Gait Orthosis, long leg braces, passive standing or self-reported physical activity as a treatment for low bone mass.

Physical Activity and Pain

  • Regular exercise reduces post-SCI pain.
  • Shoulder exercise protocol reduces post-SCI shoulder pain intensity.

Physical Activity and Spasticity

  • Hippotherapy may result in short-term reductions in spasticity.
  • A combination of neural facilitation techniques and Baclofen may reduce spasticity.
  • Rhythmic passive movements may produce short-term reductions in spasticity.
  • Prolonged standing or other methods of producing muscle stretch may result in reduced spasticity.
  • Active exercise interventions such as hydrotherapy and (FES) functional electrical stimulation-assisted walking may produce short-term reductions in spasticity.

Physical Activity and Periodic Leg Movements

  • Aerobic exercise is effective in reducing night-time periodic limb movements in persons with complete paraplegia.

Physical Activity Participation Levels in SCI

  • There is tremendous variability in the amount of physical activity performed by people living with SCI. A large segment of the population does not engage in any leisure-time physical activity whatsoever.

Barriers to Physical Activity Participation in the SCI Population

  • Individuals with SCI encounter numerous impediments to physical activity participation including intrapersonal, systemic, and expertise barriers. Interventions are needed to help people with SCI manage these barriers.

Effectiveness of Interventions to Increase Physical Activity Participation in SCI

  • Behavioural interventions promoting physical activity in the SCI population can lead to increased levels of physical activity participation.

References

  • Adams MM, Hicks AL. Spasticity after spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2005;43(10):577-586.
  • Anderson KD. Targeting recovery: priorities of the spinal cord-injured population. J Neurotrauma 2004;21(10):1371-1383.
  • Andersen, J. L., Mohr, T., Biering-Sorensen, F., Galbo, H., & Kjaer, M. (1996). Myosin heavy chain isoform transformation in single fibres from m. vastus lateralis in spinal cord injured individuals: effects of long-term functional electrical stimulation (FES). Pflugers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology, 431, 513-518.
  • Arbour-Nicitopoulos KP, Ginis KA, Latimer AE. Planning, leisure-time physical activity, and coping self-efficacy in persons with spinal cord injury: a randomized controlled trial. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 2009;90:2003-11.
  • Ashe M, Craven C, Krassioukov A, Eng J. (2008) Bone Health Following Spinal Cord Injury. In: Eng J, Teasell R, Miller W, Wolfe D, Townson A, Hsieh J et al., editors. Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Evidence. Vancouver.
  • Ashe MC, Craven C, Krassioukov A, Eng JJ (2010). Bone Health Following Spinal Cord Injury. In: Eng JJ, Teasell RW, Miller WC, Wolfe DL, Townson AF, Hsieh JTC, Connolly SJ, Mehta S, Sakakibara BM, editors. Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Evidence. Version 3.0 Vancouver: p 1-26.
  • Ashe MC, Eng JJ, Krassioukov AV, Warburton DE, Hung C, Tawashy A. Response to functional electrical stimulation cycling in women with spinal cord injuries using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and peripheral quantitative computed tomography: a case series. Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine 2010;33:68-72.
  • Bandura A. Social Foundations of Human Behaviour. New York, NY: Harper and Row, 1986.
  • Bandura A. Health promotion by social cognitive means. Health Education & Behavior, 2004;31(2):143-164.
  • Bauman WA, Spungen AM, Adkins RH, Kemp BJ. Metabolic and endocrine changes in persons aging with spinal cord injury. Assist Technol 1999;11(2):88-96.
  • Belanger M, Stein RB, Wheeler GD, Gordon T, Leduc B. Electrical stimulation: can it increase muscle strength and reverse osteopenia in spinal cord injured individuals? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000;81(8):1090-1098.
  • Ben M, Harvey L, Denis S, Glinsky J, Goehl G, Chee S et al. Does 12 weeks of regular standing prevent loss of ankle mobility and bone mineral density in people with recent spinal cord injuries? Aust J Physiother 2005;51(4):251-256.
  • Bjerkefors A, Jansson A, Thorstensson A. Shoulder muscle strength in paraplegics before and after kayak ergometer training. European Journal of Applied Physiology 2006;97:613-8.
  • Block P, Skeels SE, Keys CB, Rimmer JH. Shake-It-Up: health promotion and capacity building for people with spinal cord injuries and related neurological disabilities. Disabil Rehabil 2005;27(4):185-190.
  • Boyd E, Bardak L. Cross Canada Checkup: Interim Report of the national consultations on SCI services in Canada – a qualitative overview.  1-91. 2004. Vancouver, BC, Rick Hansen Man in Motion Foundation.
  • Bradley MB. The effect of participating in a functional electrical stimulation exercise program on affect in people with spinal cord injuries. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994;75(6):676-679.
  • Cameron T, Broton JG, Needham-Shropshire B, Klose KJ. An upper body exercise system incorporating resistive exercise and neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMS). J Spinal Cord Med 1998;21(1):1-6.
  • Carpenter C, Forwell SJ, Jongbloed LE, Backman CL. Community participation after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007;88(4):427-433.
  • Carvalho, d. A., Junior, A. C., Rondina, J. M., & Cendes, F. (2008). Muscle hypertrophy in quadriplegics with combined electrical stimulation and body weight support training. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 31, 171-175.
  • Carvalho, d. A, Cliquet A, Cendes F. Electrical stimulation during gait promotes increase in muscle cross-sectional area in quadriplegics. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009;467:553-557.
  • Chen SC, Lai CH, Chan WP, Huang MH, Tsai HW, Chen JJ. Increases in bone mineral density after functional electrical stimulation cycling exercises in spinal cord injured patients. Disabil Rehabil 2005;27(22):1337-1341.
  • Chilibeck PD, Jeon J, Weiss C, Bell G, Burnham R. Histochemical changes in muscle of individuals with spinal cord injury following functional electrical stimulated exercise training. Spinal Cord 1999;37(4):264-268.
  • Connolly S, Foulon B, Teasell R, Aubut J, Jarus T. (2008) Upper Limb Rehabilitation Following Spinal Cord Injury. In: Eng J, Teasell R, Miller W, Wolfe D, Townson A, Hsieh J et al., editors. Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Evidence. Vancouver.
  • Connolly SJ, Mehta, S, Foulon BL, Teasell RW, Aubut JL, (2010). Upper Limb Rehabilitation Following Spinal Cord Injury. In Eng JJ, Teasell RW, Miller WC, Wolfe DL, Townson AF, Hsieh JTC, Connolly SJ, Mehta S, Sakakibara BM, editors. Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Evidence. Version 3.0. Vancouver: p 1-1
  • Cowell LL, Squires WG, Raven PB. Benefits of aerobic exercise for the paraplegic: a brief review. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1986;18(5):501-508.
  • Crameri RM, Weston A, Climstein M, Davis GM, Sutton JR. Effects of electrical stimulation-induced leg training on skeletal muscle adaptability in spinal cord injury. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2002;12(5):316-322.
  • Crameri RM, Cooper P, Sinclair PJ, Bryant G, Weston A. Effect of load during electrical stimulation training in spinal cord injury. Muscle Nerve 2004;29(1):104-111.
  • da Silva MCR, de Oliveira RJ, Conceicao MIG. Effects of swimming on the functional independence of patients with spinal cord injury. Rev Bras Med Esporte 2005;11(4):237-241.
  • Dallmeijer AJ, Van Der Woude LH, Hollander PA, Angenot EL. Physical performance in persons with spinal cord injuries after discharge from rehabilitation. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1999;31(8):1111-1117.
  • Davis GM, Shephard RJ, Leenen FH. Cardiac effects of short term arm crank training in paraplegics: echocardiographic evidence. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1987;56(1):90-96.
  • de Carvalho DC, Cliquet A, Jr. Energy expenditure during rest and treadmill gait training in quadriplegic subjects. Spinal Cord 2005;43(11):658-663.
  • de Carvalho DC, Martins CL, Cardoso SD, Cliquet A. Improvement of metabolic and cardiorespiratory responses through treadmill gait training with neuromuscular electrical stimulation in quadriplegic subjects. Artif Organs 2006;30(1):56-63.
  • De Groot PC, Hjeltnes N, Heijboer AC, Stal W, Birkeland K. Effect of training intensity on physical capacity, lipid profile and insulin sensitivity in early rehabilitation of spinal cord injured individuals. Spinal Cord 2003;41(12):673-679.
  • De Mello MT, Lauro FA, Silva AC, Tufik S. Incidence of periodic leg movements and of the restless legs syndrome during sleep following acute physical activity in spinal cord injury subjects. Spinal Cord 1996;34(5):294-296.
  • De Mello MT, Silva AC, Esteves AM, Tufik S. Reduction of periodic leg movement in individuals with paraplegia following aerobic physical exercise. Spinal Cord 2002;40(12):646-649.
  • De Mello MT, Esteves AM, Tufik S. Comparison between dopaminergic agents and physical exercise as treatment for periodic limb movements in patients with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2004;42(4):218-221.
  • Devillard X, Rimaud D, Roche F, Calmels P. Effects of training programs for spinal cord injury. Ann Readapt Med Phys 2007;50(6):490-499.
  • DeVivo MJ, Krause JS, Lammertse DP. Recent trends in mortality and causes of death among persons with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80(11):1411-1419.
  • Ditor DS, Latimer AE, Ginis KA, Arbour KP, McCartney N, Hicks AL. Maintenance of exercise participation in individuals with spinal cord injury: effects on quality of life, stress and pain. Spinal Cord 2003;41(8):446-450.
  • Ditor DS, Macdonald MJ, Kamath MV, Bugaresti J, Adams M, McCartney N et al. The effects of body-weight supported treadmill training on cardiovascular regulation in individuals with motor-complete SCI. Spinal Cord 2005;43(11):664-673.
  • Ditor DS, Kamath MV, Macdonald MJ, Bugaresti J, McCartney N, Hicks AL. Effects of body weight-supported treadmill training on heart rate variability and blood pressure variability in individuals with spinal cord injury. J Appl Physiol 2005;98(4):1519-1525.
  • Duffell, L. D., Donaldson, N. N., Perkins, T. A., Rushton, D. N., Hunt, K. J., Kakebeeke, T. H. et al. (2008). Long-term intensive electrically stimulated cycling by spinal cord-injured people: effect on muscle properties and their relation to power output. Muscle & Nerve, 38, 1304-1311.
  • Duran FS, Lugo L, Ramirez L, Eusse E. Effects of an exercise program on the rehabilitation of patients with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82(10):1349-1354.
  • Effing TW, van Meeteren NL, van Asbeck FW, Prevo AJ. Body weight-supported treadmill training in chronic incomplete spinal cord injury: a pilot study evaluating functional health status and quality of life. Spinal Cord 2006;44(5):287-296.
  • Erika Scremin AM, Lyvia K, Amilcare G et al. Increasing muscle mass in spinal cord injured persons with a functional electrical stimulation exercise program. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80:1531-6 (abstr).
  • Eser P, de Bruin ED, Telley I, Lechner HE, Knecht H, Stussi E. Effect of electrical stimulation-induced cycling on bone mineral density in spinal cord-injured patients. Eur J Clin Invest 2003;33(5):412-419.
  • Fernhall B, Heffernan K, Jae SY, Hedrick B. Health implications of physical activity in individuals with spinal cord injury: a literature review. J Health Hum Serv Adm 2008;30(4):468-502.
  • Fukuoka Y, Nakanishi R, Ueoka H, Kitano A, Takeshita K, Itoh M. Effects of wheelchair training on VO2 kinetics in the participants with spinal-cord injury. Disability & Rehabilitation Assistive Technology 2006;1:167-74.
  • Gerrits, H. L., De, H. A., Sargeant, A. J., Dallmeijer, A., & Hopman, M. T. (2000). Altered contractile properties of the quadriceps muscle in people with spinal cord injury following functional electrical stimulated cycle training. Spinal Cord, 38, 214-223.
  • Gerrits HL, Hopman MT, Sargeant AJ, Jones DA, De HA. Effects of training on contractile properties of paralyzed quadriceps muscle. Muscle & Nerve 2002;25:559-67.
  • Giangregorio L, McCartney N. Bone loss and muscle atrophy in spinal cord injury: epidemiology, fracture prediction, and rehabilitation strategies. J Spinal Cord Med 2006;29(5):489-500.
  • Giangregorio LM, Hicks AL, Webber CE, Phillips SM, Craven BC, Bugaresti JM et al. Body weight supported treadmill training in acute spinal cord injury: impact on muscle and bone. Spinal Cord 2005;43(11):649-657.
  • Giangregorio LM, Webber CE, Phillips SM, Hicks AL, Craven BC, Bugaresti JM et al. Can body weight supported treadmill training increase bone mass and reverse muscle atrophy in individuals with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury? Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 2006;31(3):283-291.
  • Ginis KA, Hicks AL. Exercise research issues in the spinal cord injured population. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 2005;33(1):49-53.
  • Ginis KA, Hicks AL. Considerations for the development of a physical activity guide for Canadians with physical disabilities. Can J Public Health 2007;98 Suppl 2:S135-S147.
  • Glinsky, J., Harvey, L., Korten, M., Drury, C., Chee, S., & Gandevia, S. C. (2008). Short-term progressive resistance exercise may not be effective at increasing wrist strength in people with tetraplegia: a randomised controlled trial. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy, 54, 103-108.
  • Gollwitzer PA. Goal achievement: The role of intentions. European Review of Social Psychology 1993;4:142-185.
  • Gollwitzer, P. M., Kinney, R. F. Effects of a deliberative and implemental mind-sets on illusions of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1989;56:531–542.
  • Granat MH, Ferguson AC, Andrews BJ, Delargy M. The role of functional electrical stimulation in the rehabilitation of patients with incomplete spinal cord injury--observed benefits during gait studies. Paraplegia 1993;31(4):207-215.
  • Gregory CM, Bowden MG, Jayaraman A, Shah P, Behrman A, Kautz SA et al. Resistance training and locomotor recovery after incomplete spinal cord injury: a case series. Spinal Cord 2007;45(7):522-530.
  • Griffin, L., Decker, M. J., Hwang, J. Y., Wang, B., Kitchen, K., Ding, Z. et al. (2009). Functional electrical stimulation cycling improves body composition, metabolic and neural factors in persons with spinal cord injury. Journal of Electromyography & Kinesiology, 19, 614-622.
  • Grimby G, Broberg C, Krotkiewska I, Krotkiewski M. Muscle fibre composition in patients with traumatic cord lesion. Scand J Rehabil Med 1976;8(1):37-42.
  • Guest RS, Klose KJ, Needham-Shropshire BM, Jacobs PL. Evaluation of a training program for persons with SCI paraplegia using the Parastep 1 ambulation system: part 4. Effect on physical self-concept and depression. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997;78(8):804-807.
  • Hart KA, Rintala DH, Fuhrer MJ. Educational interests of individuals with spinal cord injury living in the community: medical, sexuality, and wellness topics. Rehabil Nurs 1996;21(2):82-90.
  • Hartkopp, A., Harridge, S. D., Mizuno, M., Ratkevicius, A., Quistorff, B., Kjaer, M. et al. (2003). Effect of training on contractile and metabolic properties of wrist extensors in spinal cord-injured individuals. Muscle & Nerve, 27, 72-80.
  • Heesterbeek PJC, Berkelmans HWA, Thijssen DHJ, van Kuppevelt HJ, Hopman MTE, Duysens J. Increased physical fitness after 4-week training on a new hybrid FES-cycle in persons with spinal cord injury. Technology and Disability 2005;17:103-110.
  • Hicks AL, Martin KA, Ditor DS, Latimer AE, Craven C, Bugaresti J et al. Long-term exercise training in persons with spinal cord injury: effects on strength, arm ergometry performance and psychological well-being. Spinal Cord 2003;41(1):34-43.
  • Hicks AL, Adams MM, Martin GK, Giangregorio L, Latimer A, Phillips SM et al. Long-term body-weight-supported treadmill training and subsequent follow-up in persons with chronic SCI: effects on functional walking ability and measures of subjective well-being. Spinal Cord 2005;43(5):291-298.
  • Hjeltnes N, Aksnes AK, Birkeland KI, Johansen J, Lannem A, Wallberg-Henriksson H. Improved body composition after 8 wk of electrically stimulated leg cycling in tetraplegic patients. Am J Physiol 1997;273(3 Pt 2):R1072-R1079.
  • Hjeltnes N, Wallberg-Henriksson H. Improved work capacity but unchanged peak oxygen uptake during primary rehabilitation in tetraplegic patients. Spinal Cord 1998;36(10):691-698.
  • Hsieh J, Wolfe D, Townson A, Short C, Connolly S, Curt A et al. (2008) Spasticity Following Spinal Cord Injury. In: Eng J, Teasell R, Miller W, Wolfe D, Townson A, Hsieh J et al., editors. Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Evidence. Vancouver.
  • Hsieh JTC, Wolfe DL, Townson AF, Short C, Connolly SJ, Mehta S, Curt A, Foulon BL, (2010). Spasticity Following Spinal Cord Injury. In Eng JJ, Teasell RW, Miller WC, Wolfe DL, Townson AF, Hsieh JTC, Connolly SJ, Mehta S, Sakakibara BM, editors. Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Evidence. Version 3.0.
  • Jacobs, P. L. (2009). Effects of resistance and endurance training in persons with paraplegia. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 41, 992-997.
  • Jacobs PL, Nash MS. Modes, benefits, and risks of voluntary and electrically induced exercise in persons with spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med 2001;24(1):10-18.
  • Jacobs PL, Nash MS, Rusinowski JW. Circuit training provides cardiorespiratory and strength benefits in persons with paraplegia. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001;33(5):711-717.
  • Jacobs PL, Nash MS. Exercise recommendations for individuals with spinal cord injury. Sports Med 2004;34(11):727-751.
  • Jeon JY, Weiss CB, Steadward RD, Ryan E, Burnham RS, Bell G et al. Improved glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity after electrical stimulation-assisted cycling in people with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2002;40(3):110-117.
  • Jiang SD, Dai LY, Jiang LS. Osteoporosis after spinal cord injury. Osteoporos Int 2006;17(2):180-192.
  • Kahn EB, Ramsey LT, Brownson RC, Heath GW, Howze EH, Powell KE et al. The effectiveness of interventions to increase physical activity. A systematic review. Am J Prev Med 2002;22(4 Suppl):73-107.
  • Kakebeeke TH, Lechner HE, Knapp PA. The effect of passive cycling movements on spasticity after spinal cord injury: preliminary results. Spinal Cord 2005;43(8):483-488.
  • Kehn M, Kroll T. Staying physically active after spinal cord injury: a qualitative exploration of barriers and facilitators to exercise participation. BMC Public Health 2009;9:168.
  • Kennedy P, Taylor N, Hindson L. A pilot investigation of a psychosocial activity course for people with spinal cord injuries. Psychology Health & Medicine 2006;11:91-9.
  • Kern H, Hofer C, Modlin M et al. Stable muscle atrophy in long-term paraplegics with complete upper motor neuron lesion from 3- to 20-year SCI. Spinal Cord 2008;46:293-304.
  • Kern, H., Carraro, U., Adami, N., Hofer, C., Loefler, S., Vogelauer, M. et al. (2010). One year of home-based daily FES in complete lower motor neuron paraplegia: recovery of tetanic contractility drives the structural improvements of denervated muscle. Neurological Research, 32,  5-12
  • Kesiktas N, Paker N, Erdogan N, Gulsen G, Bicki D, Yilmaz H. The use of hydrotherapy for the management of spasticity. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2004;18(4):268-273.
  • Klose KJ, Schmidt DL, Needham BM, Brucker BS, Green BA, Ayyar DR. Rehabilitation therapy for patients with long-term spinal cord injuries. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 1990;71:659-62.
  • Kosma M, Cardinal BJ, McCubbin JA. A pilot study of a web-based physical activity motivational program for adults with physical disabilities. Disabil Rehabil 2005;27(23):1435-1442.
  • Krause JS. Self-reported problems after spinal cord injury: Implications for rehabilitation practice. TOP SPINAL CORD INJ REHABIL 2007;12(3):35-44.
  • Kruk J. Physical activity in the prevention of the most frequent chronic diseases: an analysis of the recent evidence. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2007;8(3):325-338.
  • Lam T, Wolfe DL, Hsieh JTC, Whittaker M, Eng JJ (2008). Lower Limb Rehabilitation Following Spinal Cord Injury. In: Eng JJ, Teasell RW, Miller WC, Wolfe DL, Townson AF, Hsieh JTC, Konnyu KJ, Connolly SJ, Foulon BL, Aubut JL, editors. Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Evidence. Version 2.0. Vancouver: p 6.1-6.41.
  • Lam T, Wolfe DL, Eng JJ, Domingo A (2010). Lower Limb Rehabilitation Following Spinal Cord Injury. In: Eng JJ, Teasell RW, Miller WC, Wolfe DL, Townson AF, Hsieh JTC, Connolly SJ, Mehta S, Sakakibara BM, editors. Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Evidence. Version 3.0. Vancouver: p 1-47.
  • Latimer AE, Ginis KA, Hicks AL, McCartney N. An examination of the mechanisms of exercise-induced change in psychological well-being among people with spinal cord injury. J Rehabil Res Dev 2004;41(5):643-652.
  • Latimer AE, Martin Ginis KA, Hicks AL. Buffering the effects of stress on well-being among individuals with spinal cord injury: A potential role for exercise. Therapeutic Recreation Journal 2005;39(2):131-138.
  • Latimer AE, Ginis KA, Craven BC, Hicks AL. The physical activity recall assessment for people with spinal cord injury: validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2006a;38(2):208-216.
  • Latimer AE, Martin Ginis KA, Arbour KP. The efficacy of an implementation intention intervention for promoting physical activity among individuals with spinal cord injury: A randomized controlled trial. Rehabil Psychol 2006b;51(4):273-280.
  • Le Foll-de Moro D, Tordi N, Lonsdorfer E, Lonsdorfer J. Ventilation efficiency and pulmonary function after a wheelchair interval-training program in subjects with recent spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86(8):1582-1586.
  • Lechner HE, Feldhaus S, Gudmundsen L, Hegemann D, Michel D, Zach GA et al. The short-term effect of hippotherapy on spasticity in patients with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2003;41(9):502-505.
  • Lechner HE, Kakebeeke TH, Hegemann D, Baumberger M. The effect of hippotherapy on spasticity and on mental well-being of persons with spinal cord injury. ARCH PHYS MED REHABIL 2007;88(10):1241-1248.
  • Lee MS, Choi YC, Lee SH, Lee SB. Sleep-related periodic leg movements associated with spinal cord lesions. Mov Disord 1996;11(6):719-722.
  • Li S, Xue S, Li Z, Liu X. Effect of baclofen combined with neural facilitation technique on the reduction of muscular spasm in patients with spinal cord injury. Neural Regeneration Research 2007;2(8):510-512.
  • Mahoney ET, Bickel CS, Elder C, Black C, Slade JM, Apple D, Jr. et al. Changes in skeletal muscle size and glucose tolerance with electrically stimulated resistance training in subjects with chronic spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86(7):1502-1504.
  • Manns PJ, Chad KE. Determining the relation between quality of life, handicap, fitness, and physical activity for persons with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80(12):1566-1571.
  • Marcus BH, Simkin LR. The transtheoretical model: applications to exercise behavior. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1994;26(11):1400-1404.
  • Martin Ginis KA, Latimer AE, McKechnie K, Ditor DS, Hicks AL, Bugaresti J. Using exercise to enhance subjective well-being among people with spinal cord injury: The mediating influences of stress and pain. REHABIL PSYCHOL 2003;48(3):157-164.
  • Martin Ginis KA, Latimer AE, Buchholz AC, Bray SR, Craven BC, Hayes KC et al. Establishing evidence-based physical activity guidelines: methods for the Study of Health and Activity in People with Spinal Cord Injury (SHAPE SCI). Spinal Cord 2008;46(3):216-221.
  • Martin Ginis KA, Latimer AE, Arbour-Nicitopoulos KP et al. Leisure time physical activity in a population-based sample of people with spinal cord injury part I: demographic and injury-related correlates. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010;91:722-8.
  • Martin Ginis KA, Arbour-Nicitopoulos KP, Latimer AE et al. Leisure time physical activity in a population-based sample of people with spinal cord injury part II: activity types, intensities, and durations. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010;91:729-33.
  • Martin KA, Latimer AE, Francoeur C, Hanley H. Sustaining exercise motivation and participation among people with spinal cord injuries - Lessons learned from a 9 month intervention. Palaestra 2002;18(1):38-51.
  • Mirbagheri MM, Ladouceur M, Barbeau H, Kearney RE. The effects of long-term FES-assisted walking on intrinsic and reflex dynamic stiffness in spastic spinal-cord-injured subjects. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2002;10(4):280-289.
  • Mohr T, Andersen JL, Biering-Sorensen F, Galbo H, Bangsbo J, Wagner A et al. Long-term adaptation to electrically induced cycle training in severe spinal cord injured individuals. Spinal Cord 1997;35(1):1-16.
  • Mohr T, Dela F, Handberg A, Biering-Sorensen F, Galbo H, Kjaer M. Insulin action and long-term electrically induced training in individuals with spinal cord injuries. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001;33(8):1247-1252.
  • Muraki S, Tsunawake N, Hiramatsu S, Yamasaki M. The effect of frequency and mode of sports activity on the psychological status in tetraplegics and paraplegics. Spinal Cord 2000;38(5):309-314.
  • Myers J, Lee M, Kiratli J. Cardiovascular disease in spinal cord injury: an overview of prevalence, risk, evaluation, and management. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2007;86(2):142-152.
  • Myslinski MJ. Evidence-based exercise prescription for individuals with spinal cord injury. J Neurol Phys Ther 2005;29(2):104-106.
  • Nash MS. Exercise as a health-promoting activity following spinal cord injury. J Neurol Phys Ther 2005;29(2):87-103, 106.
  • Nash MS, van dV, I, van EN, Johnson BM. Effects of circuit resistance training on fitness attributes and upper-extremity pain in middle-aged men with paraplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007;88(1):70-75.
  • Needham-Shropshire BM, Broton JG, Cameron TL, Klose KJ. Improved motor function in tetraplegics following neuromuscular stimulation-assisted arm ergometry. J Spinal Cord Med 1997;20(1):49-55.
  • Odeen I, Knutsson E. Evaluation of the effects of muscle stretch and weight load in patients with spastic paraplegia. Scand J Rehabil Med 1981;13:117-121.
  • Pandyan AD, Gregoric M, Barnes MP, Wood D, van WF, Burridge J et al. Spasticity: clinical perceptions, neurological realities and meaningful measurement. Disabil Rehabil 2005;27(1-2):2-6.
  • Petrofsky JS, Stacy R, Laymon M. The relationship between exercise work intervals and duration of exercise on lower extremity training induced by electrical stimulation in humans with spinal cord injuries. European Journal of Applied Physiology 2000;82(5-6):504-509.
  • Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC, Norcross JC. In search of how people change: Application in addictive behaviours. American Psychologist 1992;47:1102-1111.
  • Prochaska JO, Velicer WF. The transtheoretical model of health behavior change. Am J Health Promot. 1997;12(1):38-48.Rimmer JH. Health promotion for people with disabilities: the emerging paradigm shift from disability prevention to prevention of secondary conditions. Phys Ther 1999;79(5):495-502.
  • Round JM, Barr FM, Moffat B, Jones DA. Fibre areas and histochemical fibre types in the quadriceps muscle of paraplegic subjects. J Neurol Sci 1993;116(2):207-211.
  • Sabatier, M. J., Stoner, L., Mahoney, E. T., Black, C., Elder, C., Dudley, G. A. et al. (2006). Electrically stimulated resistance training in SCI individuals increases muscle fatigue resistance but not femoral artery size or blood flow. Spinal Cord, 44, 227-233.
  • Scelza WM, Kalpakjian CZ, Zemper ED, Tate DG. Perceived barriers to exercise in people with spinal cord injury. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2005;84(8):576-583.
  • Semerjian TZ, Montague SM, Dominguez JF, Davidian AM, de Leon RD. Enhancement of quality of life and body satisfaction through the use of adapted exercise devices for individuals with spinal cord injuries. TOP SPINAL CORD INJ REHABIL 2005;11(2):95-108.
  • Sheel A, Reid W, Townson A, Ayas N. (2008) Respiratory Management Following Spinal Cord Injury. In: Eng J, Teasell R, Miller W, Wolfe D, Townson A, Hsieh J et al., editors. Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Evidence. Vancouver.
  • Shields RK. Muscular, skeletal, and neural adaptations following spinal cord injury. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2002;32(2):65-74.
  • Shields RK, Dudley-Javoroski S, Law LA. Electrically induced muscle contractions influence bone density decline after spinal cord injury. Spine 2006;31(5):548-553.
  • Siddall PJ, Loeser JD. Pain following spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2001;39(2):63-73.
  • Silva AC, Neder JA, Chiurciu MV, Pasqualin DC, da Silva RC, Fernandez AC et al. Effect of aerobic training on ventilatory muscle endurance of spinal cord injured men. Spinal Cord 1998;36(4):240-245.
  • Sloan KE, Bremner LA, Byrne J, Day RE, Scull ER. Musculoskeletal effects of an electrical stimulation induced cycling programme in the spinal injured. Paraplegia 1994;32(6):407-415.
  • Solomonow M, Reisin E, Aguilar E, Baratta RV, Best R, D'Ambrosia R. Reciprocating gait orthosis powered with electrical muscle stimulation (RGO II). Part II: Medical evaluation of 70 paraplegic patients. Orthopedics 1997;20(5):411-418.
  • Scremin EAM, Kurta L, Gentili A, Wiseman B, Perell K, Kunkel C, Scremin OU. Increasing muscle mass in spinal cord injured persons with a functional electrical stimulation exercise program. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1999;80:1531-1536.
  • Stevens SL, Caputo JL, Fuller DK, Morgan DW. Physical activity and quality of life in adults with spinal cord injury. Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine 2008;31:373-378.
  • Stewart BG, Tarnopolsky MA, Hicks AL, McCartney N, Mahoney DJ, Staron RS et al. Treadmill training-induced adaptations in muscle phenotype in persons with incomplete spinal cord injury. Muscle Nerve 2004;30(1):61-68.
  • Sutbeyaz ST, Koseoglu BF, Gokkaya NK. The combined effects of controlled breathing techniques and ventilatory and upper extremity muscle exercise on cardiopulmonary responses in patients with spinal cord injury. Int J Rehabil Res 2005;28(3):273-276.
  • Tasiemski T, Kennedy P, Gardner BP, Taylor N. The association of sports and physical recreation with life satisfaction in a community sample of people with spinal cord injuries. NeuroRehabilitation 2005;20(4):253-265.
  • Tawashy AE, Eng JJ, Lin KH, Tang PF, Hung C. Physical activity is related to lower levels of pain, fatigue and depression in individuals with spinal-cord injury: a correlational study. Spinal Cord 2009;47:301-306.
  • Teasell R, Aubut J, Foulon B, Wolfe D, Hsieh J, Townson A et al. (2008) Pain Following Spinal Cord Injury. In: Eng J, Teasell R, Miller W, Wolfe D, Townson A, Hsieh J et al., editors. Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Evidence. Vancouver.
  • Teasell RW, Mehta S, Aubut J, Foulon BL, Wolfe DL, Hsieh JTC, Townson AF, Short C (2010). Pain Following Spinal Cord Injury. In Eng JJ, Teasell RW, Miller WC, Wolfe DL, Townson AF, Hsieh JTC, Connolly SJ, Mehta S, Sakakibara BM, editors. Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Evidence. Version 3.0.
  • Wolfe DL, Hsieh JTC, Mehta S (2010). Rehabilitation Practices and Associated Outcomes Following Spinal Cord Injury. In Eng JJ, Teasell RW, Miller WC, Wolfe DL, Townson AF, Hsieh JTC, Connolly SJ, Mehta S, Sakakibara BM, editors. Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Evidence. Version 3.0
  • Thoumie P, Le CG, Beillot J, Dassonville J, Chevalier T, Perrouin-Verbe B et al. Restoration of functional gait in paraplegic patients with the RGO-II hybrid orthosis. A multicenter controlled study. II: Physiological evaluation. Paraplegia 1995;33(11):654-659.
  • U.S.Department of Health and Human Services. Physical Activity and Health: A Report of the Surgeon General.  1-278. 1996. Atlanta, GA, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion.
  • Valent L, Dallmeijer A, Houdijk H, Talsma E, van der WL. The effects of upper body exercise on the physical capacity of people with a spinal cord injury: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil 2007;21(4):315-330.
  • Vissers M, van dB-E, Sluis T, Bergen M, Stam H, Bussmann H. Barriers to and facilitators of everyday physical activity in persons with a spinal cord injury after discharge from the rehabilitation centre. J Rehabil Med 2008;40(6):461-467.
  • Warburton DE, Nicol CW, Bredin SS. Health benefits of physical activity: the evidence. CMAJ 2006;174(6):801-809.
  • Warburton D, Sproule S, Krassioukov A, Eng J. (2008) Health and Exercise Following Spinal Cord Injury. In: Eng J, Teasell R, Miller W, Wolfe D, Townson A, Hsieh J et al., editors. Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Evidence. Vancouver.
  • Warburton DER, Sproule S, Krassioukov A, Eng JJ (2010). Cardiovascular Health and Exercise Following Spinal Cord Injury. In Eng JJ, Teasell RW, Miller WC, Wolfe DL, Townson AF, Hsieh JTC, Connolly SJ, Mehta S, Sakakibara BM, editors. Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Evidence. Version 3.0. Vancouver: p 1-38.
  • Warms CA, Belza BL, Whitney JD, Mitchell PH, Stiens SA. Lifestyle physical activity for individuals with spinal cord injury: a pilot study. Am J Health Promot 2004;18(4):288-291.
  • Washburn RA, Figoni SF. High density lipoprotein cholesterol in individuals with spinal cord injury: the potential role of physical activity. Spinal Cord 1999;37(10):685-695.
  • Whiteneck GG, Charlifue SW, Frankel HL, Fraser MH, Gardner BP, Gerhart KA et al. Mortality, morbidity, and psychosocial outcomes of persons spinal cord injured more than 20 years ago. Paraplegia 1992;30(9):617-630.
  • Willoughby, D. S., Priest, J. W., & Jennings, R. A. (2000). Myosin heavy chain isoform and ubiquitin protease mRNA expression after passive leg cycling in persons with spinal cord injury. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 81, 157-163.
  • Wolfe D, Mehta S, Hsieh J. (2008) Rehabilitation Practice And Associated Outcomes Following Spinal Cord Injury. In: Eng J, Teasell R, Miller W, Wolfe D, Townson A, Hsieh J et al., editors. Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Evidence. Vancouver.
  • Zemper ED, Tate DG, Roller S, Forchheimer M, Chiodo A, Nelson VS et al. Assessment of a holistic wellness program for persons with spinal cord injury. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2003;82(12):957-968.

Pressure Ulcers

Regan M, Teasell RW, Keast D, Aubut JL, Foulon BL, Mehta S (2010). Pressure Ulcers Following Spinal Cord Injury. In Eng JJ, Teasell RW, Miller WC, Wolfe DL, Townson AF, Hsieh JTC, Connolly SJ, Mehta S, Sakakibara BM, editors. Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Evidence. Version 3.0.
We would like to acknowledge previous contributors: William B Mortenson

Introduction


Impact of Pressure Ulcers

Pressure ulcers are a serious, lifelong secondary complication of spinal cord injury (SCI) that have the potential to “interfere with physical, psychological and social well being and to impact overall quality of life” (Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine 2000; p9).  Although preventable in most situations, pressure ulcers may disrupt rehabilitation, prevent individuals with SCI from working or attending school and interfere with community reintegration. As well, the occurrence of a pressure ulcer can lead to rehospitalization often with an extended length of stay (Fuhrer et al. 1993; Krause 1998; Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine 2000; Jones et al. 2003).

It has been estimated that pressure ulcers can account for approximately one-fourth of the cost of care for individuals with SCI.  In the United States alone, it has been estimated that the cost of care for pressure ulcers is about 1.2-1.3 billion dollars annually while prevention could cost about one-tenth of this (Bogie et al. 2000; Jones et al. 2003).  Because of the costs associated with treating pressure ulcers, Krause et al. (2001) state, “they have received more attention among rehabilitation and public health professionals than any other type of secondary condition associated with SCI” (p107).  Despite the attention given to prevention strategies, pressure ulcers are common among individuals with SCI (Krause et al. 2001).

Incidence and Prevalence

Pressure ulcers (term used in the current document), also known as decubitius ulcers, ischemic ulcers, bed sores or skin sores, have been defined as a “localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence as a result of pressure or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction” (NPUAP 2007).  The primary cause of pressure ulcers is felt to be externally applied pressure for a prolonged period of time over bony prominences such as the sacrum and ischial tuberosities.  This applied pressure leads to decreased blood supply to the overlying soft tissues; tissue ischemia and can ultimately lead to tissue necrosis (Lamid & Ghatit 1983; Crenshaw & Vistnes 1989; Bogie et al. 1995).  DeLisa and Mikulic (1985) have noted that “the visible ulcer represents only the tip of the iceberg or the apex of the lesion” (p 210).  It may take weeks before the actual size and depth of the ulcer is known.  Deeper tissues such as muscle are more sensitive than skin to ischemia caused by pressure (Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine 2000). Deep tissue injury has been added as a distinct pressure ulcer in the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel’s 2007 updated pressure ulcer staging system (Black et al. 2007).

Pressure ulcer formation is a complex process that is still not clearly understood despite years of research.  While the amount, duration and frequency of the applied pressure, the soft tissue’s response to loading, and the role of shear and/or friction are crucial, individual patient characteristics need to be assessed as well. Intrinsic factors such as diagnosis, history of previous tissue breakdown or surgical repair, body build, posture, muscle atrophy, nutritional status as well as magnitude and distribution of interface pressures must be considered. Extrinsic factors are also important including number of hours sitting or lying in wheelchair or bed; types of activities performed while sitting; level of functional independence; type of wheelchair, cushion and bed surface used and the support surface microenvironment; environment (climate, continence, temperature); finances; family/caregiver support; living arrangements and ease of follow up (Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine 2000; Garber et al. 2007; Fleck & Sprigle 2007, Reger et al. 2007).

Annual incidence rates range from 20 – 31% and prevalence rates from 10.2 – 30% (DeLisa & Mikulic 1985, Byrne & Salzberg 1996).  Chen et al. (2005) reported an increasing pressure ulcer prevalence in recent years not explained by aging, years since injury or different demographics.  Risk of pressure ulcers was steady for the first 10 years and increased 15 years post injury. Fuhrer et al. (1993) noted that less extensive pressure ulcers, stages I & II, comprise about 75% of the total number of ulcers observed, leaving 25% as more severe or stage III and IV ulcers.

When a pressure ulcer is severe and not treated aggressively it can lead to further disability such as decreased mobility and loss of independence, surgical interventions, amputation, and even fatal infections (Krause 1998).  It has been estimated that 7-8% of those who develop pressure ulcers will die from related complications (Richards et al. 2004).  Due to the increasing life expectancy for those who sustain an SCI, the risk of developing pressure ulcers is even greater; thus making prevention a priority and a daily concern for individuals with SCI and health care providers.

Risk Factors

Prevention of pressure ulcers requires recognizing risk factors.  The number of risk factors that have been associated with pressure ulcers post SCI is numerous and yet there is limited evidence that with more understanding of these risk factors a decrease in pressure ulcer incidence will occur (Salzberg et al. 1996).  Risk factors that have been identified most often include: limitation in activity and mobility, injury completeness, moisture from bowel and bladder incontinence, lack of sensation, muscle atrophy, poor nutritional status and being underweight (DeLisa & Mikulic 1985; Salzberg et al. 1996; Krause et al. 2001).  Studies have also found that those most likely to develop pressure ulcers are male, have lower levels of education, are unemployed and do not practice standing (Byrne & Salzberg 1996; Schryvers et al. 2000; Ash 2002; Richards et al. 2004).  Other risk factorsinclude: smoking (Lamid & Ghatit 1993; Salzberg et al. 1996; Niazi et al. 1997; Krause et al. 2001), number of comorbidities especially renal, cardiovascular, pulmonary disease and diabetes (Salzberg et al. 1996; Niazi et al. 1997; Ash 2002); residing in a nursing home/hospital (Byrne & Salzberg 1996); autonomic dysreflexia (Salzberg et al. 1996), anemia and hypoalbuminemia (DeLisa & Mikulic 1985; Scivoletto et al. 2004); spasticity and a history of previous ulcers (Vidal & Sarrias 1991; Byrne & Salzberg 1996, Guihan et al. 2008); and an increase in tissue temperature (Fisher et al. 1978); race and ethnicity (Guihan et al. 2008, Saladin and Krause,2009).

Identifying the significant risk factors associated with pressure ulcer development and being able to predict which individuals are most at risk are considered key elements of prevention. A formal assessment is required as research has shown that clinicians tend to intervene only at the highest levels of risk when an informal risk assessment is completed (Ayello & Braden 2002; AHCRP Executive Summary #3, 1992; Keast et al. 2006). Many risk assessment tools in existence were designed for the general population and for this reason their “predictive value” is imprecise in the SCI population (Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine 2000). 

A review of pressure ulcer risk assessment scales used with the SCI population was conducted by Mortensen & Miller (2008). Findings indicated that the SCIPUS (Salzberg et al. 1996) and SCIPUS-A (Salzberg et al. 1999) while developed specifically for the SCI population could not be recommended for use without further testing as they lacked reliability data and were developed and tested using the same retrospective data, limiting their validity. While the two scales showed promise, the Braden scale (Bergstrom et al. 1987) seemed to be the best tool available currently, as it is well validated. The Braden scale does require more testing with individuals with SCI.

Stages (I-IV) of Pressure Ulcers

The assessment of an individual with a pressure ulcer is the basis for planning treatments, evaluating treatment effects and communicating with other caregivers”  (AHCPR, Executive Summary #15 p 3).  One key piece of this assessment is the staging of the pressure ulcer to classify the degree of tissue damage observed by the clinician (AHCPR, Executive summary # 15 1992).  In 1989, the following staging system was recommended by the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP 1989).  As knowledge of the many factors associated with pressure ulcer formation continues to emerge, the staging system has been revised, most recently in 2007 (NPUAP 2007). 

Table 1 National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel’s (NPUAP) updated pressure ulcer staging system (NPUAP 2007):

Since 1989, this staging system has been used consistently in the literature and is widely used and supported (AHCPR 1992; Consortium of Spinal Cord Medicine 2000; RNAO 2002).  However, authors of earlier studies have used numerous ways of documenting the severity of pressure ulcers making it challenging to draw parallels between studies.

Prevention

Preventing pressure ulcers is ultimately the best medicine and begins at the time of injury.  Lifelong prevention recommendations include: examining skin daily to allow for early detection of a pressure ulcer, shifting body weight in bed and wheelchair on a regular basis independently or with assistance, keeping moisture accumulation to a minimum and cleaning and drying skin promptly after soiling, having an individually prescribed wheelchair, pressure redistribution cushion and power tilt mechanism if manual pressure relief is not possible, ensuring all equipment is maintained and functioning properly, decreasing or stopping smoking and limiting alcohol intake (Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine 2000).  Krause et al. (2001) notes that effective prevention strategies require the individual with SCI to take responsibility for his/her skin care.  Prevention strategies must be individualized to promote sustainable outcomes.  Individuals with SCI need assistance from health care professionals to integrate realistic prevention strategies into daily schedules (Clark et al 2006). King et al. (2008) indicated that the value of preventative behavior needed to be emphasized. While in hospital, individuals with SCI need to practice skin care skills daily, know and direct their skin care program, learn to problem solve potential barriers while getting regular feedback on their performance. Support from family and the health care team is essential. As well, patients need to understand how quickly and quietly a pressure ulcer may appear and how it must be treated promptly. Other strategies suggested for education include training by peers, presenting information in a variety of methods including group learning, simulation exercises and case studies (Dunn et al. 2009).

It should be noted that outcome assessment for pressure ulcer prevention can be measured via either direct or indirect means. That is, the effectiveness of preventative interventions can be determined by direct indicators, like pressure ulcer incidence, or by indirect indicators, like ischial tuberosity (IT) pressure mapping or transcutaneous oxygen tension (PTCO2) levels. The former are preferred as they reflect definitive indications of the success (or failure) of preventative interventions. Sheppard et al. (2006) indicated that knowing one’s skin tolerance was related to intention to do pressure relief. Attendance at a seating clinic would be helpful as skin tolerance can be measured.

Whenever possible, individuals who are at risk for pressure ulcer development or who are being treated for a pressure ulcer should be referred to a registered dietitian for assessment and intervention as necessary (Keast et al. 2006).  In a study by Houghton & Fraser (2008), paraplegic and tetraplegic spinal cord injured individuals living in the community with pressure ulcers (stage II to unstageable) underwent assessment that included medical and wound characteristics and screening of blood values for the presence of anemia, hydration status, glycemic control and hypoproteinemia.  Study subjects with two or fewer abnormal blood values at the time of screening achieved complete wound closure following standard wound care and treatment with adjunctive therapy.  Individuals who presented with greater than two abnormal blood values related to nutrition and hydration status did not achieve wound closure.  The authors recommended that all individuals with pressure ulcers be screened for underlying inadequacies in nutrition and hydration and receive intervention to address these issues to promote optimal wound healing. Alexander et al. (1995) found that patients with paraplegia and a pressure ulcer had a resting energy expenditure that was hypermetabolic underscoring the need for thorough assessment and adequate nutritional support.

Recommendations for prevention or treatment of a pressure ulcer would include eating a well balanced, nutritionally complete diet with appropriate calories, proteins, micronutrients (vitamins and minerals) and fluids. The nutrition plan must be individualized based on the assessed needs (Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine 2000; Keast et al. 2006).  If a pressure ulcer is present, the plan would need to be optimized using foods, supplements and/or enteral nutrition if warranted.  The individual’s weight would need to be monitored as an undesirable weight trend has been identified as an early indicator of risk (Keast et al. 2006). 

There have been numerous recommendations for the prevention of pressure ulcers post SCI but it is important to consider the evidence that informs those recommendations. Potential preventative techniques found in the SCI literature that have been reviewed and will be discussed in the following section include: effect of electrical stimulation on ischial pressures and blood flow, pressure relief practices, wheelchair cushion selection, effect of lumbar support thickness on ischial pressures, specialized seating clinics, pressure ulcer prevention education, behavioural contingencies, and telerehabilitation.

Treatment

Once a pressure ulcer has begun it is important to prevent if from worsening and ultimately to have it heal quickly but this is challenging. Rappl (2008) examined the metabolic and physiological changes that happen in tissue below the level of a SCI in relation to the events which take place during wound healing. The author examined that every step of wound healing is affected by the physiological changes that occur post SCI explaining why pressure ulcers may heal more slowly in individuals with a SCI. As previously stated, severe pressure ulcers can lead to further disability, surgery, amputation and death (Krause 1998).  According to Chen et al. (2005) pressure ulcers are among the leading cause of unplanned rehospitalization post SCI and can contribute to longer lengths of stay and more costly treatment than other medical conditions.  Once an individual has had an ulcer they are at increased risk for recurrence (Krause & Broderick 2004).  Pressure ulcer treatment is more costly than prevention (Bogie et al. 2000; Jones et al. 2003). In addition to standard wound care, many adjunctive therapies are used to accelerate closure of wounds that are hard to heal.  It is important to identify appropriate clients who are likely to benefit for these treatments as they are often time consuming and expensive (Houghton & Fraser 2008; Allen & Houghton 2003).

Research has looked at the effect of: electrical stimulation, laser, US/UVC, non-thermal pulsed electromagnetic energy, topical negative pressure, normothermia, recombinant human erythropoietin, anabolic steroid therapy, effectiveness of various dressings, maggot therapy and topical oxygen for healing of pressure ulcers post SCI.  Each of these treatments will be discussed in subsequent sections.

Prevention

Effects of Electrical Stimulation on Pressure Ulcer Prevention

Electrical stimulation has been used since the 1960’s to enhance healing of various chronic wounds including pressure ulcers in both the able bodied and spinal cord injured individual (Kloth & Feeder 1988; Baker et al. 1996, Bogie et al. 2000).  More recently electrical stimulation has been studied to assess its potential for pressure ulcer prevention post SCI.

Given that the primary cause of pressure ulcers is felt to be externally applied pressure over bony prominences such as ischial tuberosities (Bogie et al. 1995), researchers have studied the role of electrical stimulation in reducing ischial pressures and redistributing seating interface pressures both of which could assist with pressure ulcer prevention (Bogie et al. 2006).  Prevention studies are focusing on skin vs. muscle stimulation, dynamic vs. long-term effects and surface vs. implanted devices (Levine et al. 1990; Bogie et al. 1995; 2000; 2006).

Table 2 Effects of Electrical Stimulation on Reducing Ischial Pressure Post SCI

Discussion

Two articles were found that examined the effects of electrical stimulation on ischial pressure.  Bogie and Triolo (2003) studied changes in interface pressure distribution at the support/surface interface following 8 weeks of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) delivered via an implanted neuroprosthesis.  With NMES, mean ischial regional interface pressure had a uniform tendency to decrease post exercise assessment, p<0.01.

Lui et al (2006b) studied the effects of electrical stimulation delivered via an implanted sacral anterior root stimulator (SARS) on seat interface pressure distribution.  With electrical stimulation of the S2 nerve root sufficient to result in gluteal muscle contraction, there was an average decrease of 33% in peak pressure p<0.01 and a 38% decrease in gradient peak pressure p<0.05 at the ischial tuberosities of the seated participants.

While it is difficult to compare these results because one study used 8 weeks of NMES versus dynamic electrical stimulation, it does appear that electrical stimulation decreases ischial pressures.  More research is needed to study the effect of long term electrical stimulation on reducing ischial pressures and whether this can be used in a clinical setting to prevent pressure ulcers post SCI.

As was stated previously, researchers are focusing on the effects of electrical stimulation, which may have a role in pressure ulcer prevention post SCI.  One effect under investigation is the ability of electrical stimulation to change blood flow to skin and muscle.  Bogie et al. (2006) state that with increasing interface pressures over bony prominences, regional blood flow is adversely affected.  It is believed that by increasing regional blood flow, tissue health would be enhanced assisting with pressure ulcer prevention (Levine et al. 1990; Bogie et al. 1995; 2000; 2006).

Table 3 Electrical Stimulation for Increasing Tissue Blood Flow Post SCI

Discussion

Lui et al (2006a) administered dynamic electrical stimulation to the S2 nerve root through an implanted sacral anterior nerve root stimulator (SARS) and studied the effects on cutaneous blood circulation as measured by changes in the index of Hemoglobin (IHB) and index of oxygenation (I0X).  With stimulation there was a statistically significant increase in IHB p = 0.005 and I0X p = 0.02.  The mechanism of how electrical stimulation altered IHB and I0X is unclear.

Bogie and Triolo (2003) administered 8 weeks of NMES to 8 subjects using gluteal electrodes.  They then assessed unloaded gluteal tissue blood flow through assessment of local transcutaneous oxygen levels (PTCO2).  While the results did not reach statistical significance, baseline mean unloaded tissue oxygen levels increased by 1-36% in 5/8 subjects.

Mawson et al. (1993) administered high voltage pulsed galvanic stimulation (HVPGS) to 29 SCI subjects lying supine.  Baseline PTCO2 levels were compared to levels reached at the end of 30 minutes of HVPGS.  The authors found PTCO2 level at the end of stimulation was 66±18 mmHg – 35% higher (p<0.00001). 

While the evidence to date is promising, more research is needed to determine the effect of electrical stimulation on blood flow to tissues at risk for pressure ulcer development post SCI.

Conclusion

  • There is limited level 4 evidence that electrical stimulation decreases ischial pressures post SCI.
  • There is level 4 evidence that electrical stimulation may increase blood flow at sacral and gluteal areas post SCI.
  • Electrical stimulation may decrease ischial pressures.
  • Electrical stimulation may increase blood flow to tissues.
  • More research is needed to see if decreasing ischial pressures and/or increasing blood flow to tissues will help prevent pressure ulcers post SCI.

Pressure Relief Practices on Pressure Ulcer Prevention Post SCI

Teaching individuals with spinal cord injuries to shift their weight regularly while seated is a common and intuitive recommendation for pressure ulcer prevention as it is hypothesized that this relieves pressure on at risk tissues and allows for recovery of blood flow and oxygenation (Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine 2000; Coggrane & Rose 2003; Makhsous et al 2007a).  Several techniques have been suggested depending on the physical and cognitive status of the individual and include a lateral, forward lean or vertical push up (Bogie et al 1995; Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine 2000).  When a manual weight shift cannot be performed the use of a power tilt feature has been recommended (Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine 2000).

Table 4 Pressure Relief Practices on Preventing Ulcers Post SCI

Discussion

There are very few studies that have researched which techniques provide adequate pressure relief and how long a weight shift must be performed to unload weight-bearing areas such as the ischia.

Spijkerman et al. (1995) assessed interface pressure while individuals were tilted at 5°, 15° and 25° from horizontal. Results indicated that body tilt had a significant effect on mean pressure p=0.003.  The lowest overall mean pressure (82.91mmHg) was demonstrated at 25° tilt.

Coggrave and Rose (2003), in a retrospective chart review of 46 SCI subjects seen in a seating clinic, assessed the duration of various pressure relief positions required for loaded transcutaneous oxygen tension (tCPO2) to recover to unloaded levels.  Results indicated that it took approximately 2 minutes of pressure relief to raise tissue oxygen to unloaded levels for most subjects.  This length of pressure relief was more easily sustained by the subjects leaning forward, side to side or having the wheelchair tipped back at > 65º compared to a pressure relief lift.

Similar to Coggrave and Rose (2003), Makhsous et al (2007a) demonstrated full recovery of tcPO2 with the dynamic protocol in the off loading configuration but it took > 2 minutes to achieve this result.  Those individuals with paraplegia using a wheelchair pushup were only able to sustain the lift for 49 seconds leading to incomplete recovery of tissue perfusion.

Henderson et al. (1994) pressure mapped 10 SCI subjects and recorded pressures at the ischial tuberosity (IT) and a circumscribed area around the IT.  The authors then pressure mapped the subjects with their wheelchairs tipped back at 35º, 65º and after the subjects were assisted into a forward leaning position >45°.  Results showed that the wheelchairs tipped back at 65º and the subjects in a forward leaning position demonstrated statistically significant pressure reduction at the IT and circumscribed area (p<0.05) with the forward lean showing the greatest reduction (78% reduction at IT, 70% reduction circumscribed area).

Hobson (1992) showed that for individuals with SCI, changes in posture can reduce maximum pressures that occur while seated.  Recline of the backrest to 120º, full body tilt to 20º, forward flexion to 50º and lateral bending to 15º all resulted in decreases in maximum pressures.  Maximum reductions in tangentially induced shear forces (TIS) occurred with forward trunk flexion of 50º and full body tilt of 20º; backrest recline to 120º increased TIS by 25%.

The studies reviewed demonstrate that pressure relief by position change, if sustained for an appropriate length of time, results in pressure reduction and recovery of tcPO2 to unloaded levels.  The type and duration of pressure relief required to achieve these results varied from individual to individual.  Sustaining a pressure relief lift/pushup for the time required to allow for recovery of tcPO2 to unloaded levels (1-2 min) would be difficult for most individuals with SCI.

Conclusion

  • There is level 3 evidence that 1-2 minutes of pressure relief must be sustained to raise tissue oxygen to unloaded levels.
  • There is level 4 evidence to support position changes to reduce pressure at the ischial tuberosities.
  • 65° of tilt or forward leaning of >45° both showed significant reduction in pressure.
  • The type and duration of pressure relief by position changing must be individualized post SCI using pressure mapping or similar techniques.
  • More research is needed to see if decreasing ischial pressures and/or increasing blood flow to tissues using weight shifting techniques will help prevent pressure ulcers post SCI.
  • For most individuals with SCI, a pushup/vertical lift of 15-30 seconds is unlikely to be sufficient to allow for complete pressure relief.

Wheelchair Cushion Selection and Pressure Ulcer Prevention Post SCI

Bogie et al (1995) stated that 47% of pressure ulcers occur at the ischial tuberosities or sacrum and are therefore more likely to have been initiated while seated.  Provision of a wheelchair cushion that relieves and redistributes pressure and reduces risk of pressure ulcer formation is an important prevention recommendation.  Historically, cushion design has been based on the belief that sitting interface pressure should be distributed evenly to reduce areas of high pressure underneath bony prominences (Yuen & Garrett 2001). Cushion selection can be difficult as there are numerous cushions on the market each citing specific characteristics along with various amounts of pressure reduction and redistribution that make a cushion “superior.”  When assessing an individual for a cushion, factors such as the degree of pressure reduction and redistribution (Garber 1985), temperature effects (Fisher et al 1978; Seymour & Lacefield 1985); level of SCI, pressure relief abilities, transfer technique and lifestyle (Garber 1985; Markhous et al. 2007a) are typically considered.  As well as a reduction in pressure ulcer risk, cushions must also promote adequate posture and stability for the individual with SCI (Sprigle et al. 1990). Seat cushions can be made from a variety of materials, can be static or dynamic (Garber 1985; Markhous et al. 2007a) and incorporated into a variety of wheelchairs.  See Table 20.4.

Table 5 Wheelchair Cushion Selection and Pressure Ulcer Prevention Post SCI

Discussion

Numerous authors have investigated various wheelchair cushions and seating systems to try and determine which offer the most pressure or risk factor reduction to prevent occurrence of pressure ulcers in individuals with SCI.

Makhsous et al. (2007b), in a case-control study, exposed subjects to two 1-hour protocols: alternate, where sitting posture was alternated dynamically every 10 minutes between normal (sitting upright with ischial support) and sitting upright with partially-removed ischial support and lumbar support (WO-BPS), and normal (normal posture plus pushups performed every 20 minutes).  These investigators found that the anterior portion of the seat cushion had a larger contact area among those with tetraplegia compared to those in the other groups.  It also was determined that those with a SCI had a larger contact area in the mid portion of the seat cushion.  There were significant differences between the groups when looking at the average pressure over the whole seat (p<0.001) and the total contact area on the seat cushion.  With the WO-BPS posture, the average pressure for the tetraplegia group was higher than it was for the other groups (p<0.001).  Most importantly, the total contact area on the posterior portion of the cushion was less for the WO-BPS posture group.  As well, peak interface pressure was lower for all groups, with the greatest decrease from normal posture seen in the tetraplegia group.  The average pressure increased on the anterior and middle portion of the cushion in all groups.

In the study conducted by Burns and Betz (1999), 3 wheelchair cushions were tested: dry flotation (ROHO High Profile), gel (Jay 2), and dynamic (ErgoDynamic), the last consisting of two air-filled bladders (H-bladder, IT-bladder). These were compared to each other under high pressure conditions (upright sitting or IT-bladder inflated) and low pressure conditions (seat tilted back 45° or H-bladder inflated).  When analyzing the pressure placed on the ischial tuberosities, it was found that the pressure was higher during upright sitting than in the tilted back position for both the dry flotation and the gel cushion (p<0.001), with the dry flotation cushion providing more pressure relief than the gel cushion during upright sitting (112 versus 128 mmHg, p=0.01).  Mean pressure with the IT-bladder-inflated cushion (157 mmHg) was greater than upright pressures for either the dry flotation or gel cushions (111 and 128 mmHg, respectively p<0.01).  Most importantly, ischial tuberosity pressure for the dynamic cushion during H-bladder inflation in an upright position was comparable to the pressure for the dry flotation cushion in a tilted back position (71 versus 74 mmHg, p=0.91) and significantly less than the pressure obtained with the gel cushion (71 versus 86 mmHg, p<0.05).

Brienza and Karg (1998) had subjects sit on 3 different surfaces (flat foam, initial contour and final contour).  Interface pressures were measured using a pressure-sensing pad.  Results indicated that when SCI subjects were compared to the elderly subjects without SCI, depth values increased and the mean maximum depth of the final contour was deeper for the SCI group, suggesting that pressure distributions for the SCI group were more sensitive to support surface characteristics than elderly subjects without SCI.

Seymour et al. (1985) evaluated 8 cushions for pressure, temperature effects and subjective factors influencing cushion purchase.  While data indicated a wide variability in pressure measurements in individual subjects, the air filled cushion (Bye Bye Decubiti) had the best pressure readings.  The alternating pressure and foam cushions had consistently higher temperature readings across both groups.

Gilsdorf et al (1991) studied subjects sitting on ROHO and Jay cushions.  Normal force, shear force, centre of force, lateral weight shifts and amount of weight supported by armrests were studied under static and dynamic conditions. The ROHO cushion showed a tendency to carry a larger percentage of total body weight; have a more anterior centre of mass; and showed more forward shear force.  There were more lateral weight shifts on the Jay cushion.  Armrests supported a portion of body weight.

Garber (1985) evaluated 7 cushions based on amount of pressure reduction.  The author also looked at how frequently each cushion was prescribed to subjects with quadriplegia and paraplegia.  The ROHO cushion produced the greatest pressure reduction in the majority of subjects (51%) but was prescribed more often for subjects with quadriplegia vs. paraplegia (55% vs. 45%).

Takechi & Tokuhiro (1998) studied the seated buttock pressure distribution in six patients with paraplegia using computerized pressure mapping. Five wheelchair cushions were evaluated (air cushion, contour cushion, polyurethrane foam cushion, cubicushion, silicone gel cushion). Tests showed that if the area of contact was more widespread, the peak pressure was lower. The air cushion and the silicone cushion were found to have the lowest peak pressures.

These studies demonstrate that there are individual variations inherent in those with SCI (e.g. paraplegia vs. tetraplegia).  As a result the need for objective measures such as pressure mapping is needed to assist with individualizing a wheelchair cushion prescription.  Objective findings together with the clinical knowledge of the prescriber, individual characteristics and the client’s subjective reports need to be considered when prescribing a wheelchair cushion to minimize pressure ulcer risk factors.  None of these studies included direct evidence of pressure ulcer prevention associated with a particular cushion type.

Conclusion

  • There is level 3 evidence that various cushions or seating systems (e.g. dynamic versus static) are associated with potentially beneficial reduction in seating interface pressure or pressure ulcer risk factors like skin temperature.
  • No one cushion is suitable for all individuals with SCI.
  • Cushion selection should be based on a combination of pressure mapping results, clinical knowledge of prescriber, individual characteristics and preference.
  • More research is needed to see if decreasing ischial pressures or decreasing risk factors such as skin temperature via the use of specialty cushions will help prevent pressure ulcers post SCI.

Lumbar Support Thickness on Reducing Ischial Pressures Post SCI

Shields and Cook (1992) discussed the role spinal deformities such as kyphosis, may play in the formation of pressure ulcers in individuals with chronic SCI.  In previous research with non-disabled subjects, they had demonstrated that the addition of lumbar support reduced highest seated buttock pressure and was associated with a change in pelvic tilt.  If those findings were to hold true in the SCI population, the authors noted this could lead to ways to assess seated postures for appropriate pressure distribution and augment electric wheelchair seating systems to provide continuous pressure shifts.

Table 6 Lumbar Support Thickness on Reducing Ischial Pressures Post SCI

Discussion

Shields and Cook (1992) studied 18 SCI and able-bodied subjects to test the effect of varying lumbar support thickness (0, 2.5, 5.0, 7.5 cm) on seated buttock pressures at the ischial tuberosities.  With the SCI group a 2% decrease in mean high pressure was seen with the 7.5 cm lumbar support compared to a 90% reduction for the control group.  With the 2.5 cm and the 5 cm lumbar support there was an increase in mean high pressure of 12% and 13% respectively compared to reductions in the control group of 25% and 80%, respectively.  Surprisingly, the findings showed that the addition of lumbar support to wheelchairs had a minimal effect on reducing highest seated buttock pressure at the ischial tuberosities of subjects with chronic ≥ 3 years SCI.  Given the minimal effect noted on reducing pressures at the IT, adding lumbar support to the wheelchair of those with chronic SCI is unlikely to have a role in prevention of pressure ulcers post SCI.

Conclusion

  • There is level 3 evidence that adding lumbar support to the wheelchair of those with chronic SCI has a negligible effect on reducing seated buttock pressures at the ischial tuberosities. 
  • Adding lumbar support to the wheelchairs of individuals with chronic SCI is unlikely to have a role in pressure ulcer prevention post SCI.

The Effect of Specialized Seating Clinics on Pressure Ulcer Prevention Post SCI

Developing the ability to maintain skin integrity and prevent pressure ulcer formation is an important component of any SCI rehabilitation program.  Prevention education includes an emphasis on taking personal responsibility for maintaining healthy skin through personal care, inspection of skin, pressure relief and correct use of prescribed equipment (Bogie et al. 1995).  The incorporation of seating clinics into both the inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation program has been shown to reduce the incidence of pressure ulcers and readmission rates due to pressure ulcers (Dover et al. 1992).  Seating clinics not only provide education but also make recommendations for appropriate seating systems based on interface pressures, thermography and assessment of tissue viability.  Verbal and visual feedback is provided to the individual with SCI and active participation is encouraged (Dover et al. 1992; Coggrave & Rose 2003; Kennedy et al. 2003).

Table 7 The Effect of Specialized Clinics on Pressure Ulcer Prevention

Discussion

Kennedy et al. (2003) studied 50 individuals with SCI participating in a comprehensive rehabilitation program.  The individuals were divided into 3 groups to determine if attendance at a specialized seating assessment clinic (SSA) would improve skin management ability as evidenced by lower  “to be achieved” scores on the skin subscale of the Needs Assessment Checklist (NAC); optimal timing of attendance at the SSA was also studied.  Results indicated significant differences between group 1 (attendance at SSA prior to NAC 1 (within one month of mobilization)) and group 3 (no attendance at SSA) at both NAC 1 (p<0.05) and NAC 2 (on admission to pre-discharge ward) (p<0.01).  Skin management “to be achieved” scores were significantly lower for individuals who attended SSA before their first NAC at both time points.  Significant differences were also observed between “to be achieved” scores at first and second NAC within all groups: Group 1(p<0.0001), Group 2 (p<0.01) and Group 3 (p<0.01).  Results indicate that attendance at a SSA did improve individual’s skin management abilities and that early attendance was optimal.  The results also indicate that attendance at SSA is an adjunct to the skin management abilities taught during a comprehensive rehabilitation program.  More research is needed to determine if early attendance at a SSA translates into prevention of pressure ulcers over time.

Conclusion

  • There is Level 2 evidence showing that early attendance at specialized seating assessment clinics (SSA) increases the skin management abilities of individuals post SCI. 
  • Early attendance at specialized seating assessment clinics should be part of a comprehensive rehabilitation program.
  • More research is needed to determine if early attendance at a specialized seating assessment clinic (SSA) results in pressure ulcer prevention over time.

Pressure Ulcer Prevention Education Post SCI

Pressure ulcer prevention education programs for individuals with SCI provide knowledge and emphasize behaviours intended to reduce the risk of pressure ulcer occurrence (Bogie 1995; Rodriguez & Garber 1994; Schubart et al. 2008).  Typically this education is delivered while the individual is an inpatient at a time when they and their family are adjusting to a diagnosis of SCI and are likely suffering from information overload.  Under these circumstances, the individuals’ ability to appreciate the knowledge and behaviours necessary to prevent pressure ulcers over their lifetime is compromised (Garber et al.1996; Schubart et al. 2008).  With shorter lengths of stay, there is less time to deliver prevention education and fewer opportunities for reinforcement of acquired knowledge.  This means that individuals with SCI are being discharged with potentially less information on pressure ulcer prevention (Garber et al.1996).  As well, there is little data on the specific education needs required by individuals with SCI at risk for pressure ulcer formation (Schubart et al 2008) (See Table 20.9).

Table 8 Pressure Ulcer Prevention Education Post SCI

Discussion

In an RCT conducted by Garber et al. (2002), subjects in the intervention group (n=20) while an inpatient for pressure ulcer surgery were provided with four 1-hour sessions of enhanced education on the prevention and management of pressure ulcers. Information presented at the sessions included education regarding preventative strategies such as skin inspection, weight shifts/turns, nutrition and pressure redistribution surfaces for the bed and wheelchair, as well as pressure ulcer etiology.  The control group (n=21) received standard education regarding preventative practices. After discharge, the groups were followed for 2 years or until recurrence of pelvic pressure ulcer. 

Improvement on the pressure ulcer knowledge test was noted in both groups upon discharge from hospital; however, it was significantly different between the groups (p<0.03), with those in the intervention group gaining more knowledge about preventing pressure ulcers. No significant differences were noted on the multidimensional Health Locus of Control Scale and the Health Beliefs Questionnaire between the two groups at discharge.  Two years post treatment, it was noted that both groups had retained most of the knowledge they had gained during their hospitalization, but the level of knowledge retained by the control group was below that of the treatment group: 60.8% versus 68% on the pressure ulcer knowledge test.

In a parallel study, Rintala et al. (2008), randomized the same subjects into three groups: Group 1 (N=20) had received the enhanced education sessions. They were followed through structured monthly telephone contact where they were questioned regarding skin status, pressure ulcer preventative behaviors and reminded of behaviors they were not using. Group 2 (N=11) were contacted monthly by mail to assess skin status only and Group 3 (n=10) were contacted every 3 months by mail to assess skin status. If those in groups 2 and 3 had not responded in 2 weeks, they were contacted by telephone. Group 1 had a significantly longer time before recurrence of pressure ulcers (19.6 months, p=0.002) while no significant difference was seen between group 2 or 3. For persons who had not had previous pressure ulcer surgery, the enhanced education and structured follow-ups extended their ulcer free time. As well, less people in group 1 had a recurrence of a pressure ulcer (33.3%) versus group 2 (60%) and group 3 (90%).

In summary, those individuals who received an enhanced education and structured follow-up, showed more improvement on the pressure ulcer knowledge test at discharge, retained more of this knowledge 2 years post intervention and had fewer recurrences of pressure ulcers. For those individuals who went on to have a recurrence, time to recurrence was much longer.

Conclusion

  • There is Level 2 evidence that providing enhanced pressure ulcer prevention education is effective at helping individuals with SCI gain and retain this knowledge. 
  • There is level 1 evidence that providing enhanced pressure ulcer education and structured follow-up is effective in reducing recurrence of pressure ulcers especially in those individuals with no previous history of pressure ulcer surgery.
  • Structured pressure ulcer prevention education, helps individuals post SCI gain and retain knowledge of pressure ulcer prevention practices.
  • Research is needed to determine the specific educational needs of individuals with SCI required to reduce the risk of pressure ulcer formation.
  • More research is needed to determine if pressure ulcer prevention education results in a reduction of pressure ulcers post SCI.

Effect of Behavioural Contingencies on Pressure Ulcer Prevention Post SCI

Despite the attention given to prevention of pressure ulcers, they continue to be a common occurrence among individuals with SCI (Krause et al. 2001).  For many patients admitted to hospital with a pressure ulcer it is their first time but there is a group of patients who have recurring pressure ulcers.  For some of these individuals the recurrence is due to noncompliance with prevention strategies possibly related to lack of incentives to maintain healthy behaviours (Jones et al. 2003).  What is not known is whether rewarding positive prevention strategies would reduce the severity of pressure ulcers or prevent them entirely, and are the results sustainable once the rewards are withdrawn?

Table 9 Effect of Behavioural Contingencies on Pressure Ulcer Prevention Post SCI

Discussion

Results of study 1 showed average Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing (PUSH) scores were lower by 10.5 points from baseline; no hospitalizations were required and ultimately costs during the intervention phase went from $6263.00 (US) to $235.00 (US).  In the post-intervention phase, 3 subjects were able to maintain the lower PUSH scores and 3 were not.  In study 2, the results were highly variable.  Mean PUSH scores decreased from baseline by 8.3 points (visits only) and a further 3.1 points when payments were added.  For 2 out of 3 participants PUSH scores rose again during the post-intervention phase.  The mean number of hospitalizations dropped from 1.67 (baseline) to 0.33 (intervention and post-intervention).

Although this was a very small study, the data from study 1indicates that when behavioural contingencies were introduced, positive behaviours resulted.  As well, this is one of the few prevention studies that did not use indirect outcome measures. For some participants results were sustainable once behavioural contingencies were withdrawn.  More research is needed to determine the role of behavioural contingencies in pressure ulcer prevention post SCI.

Conclusion

  • There is very limited level 4 evidence to suggest that the introduction of behavioural contingencies is associated with a reduction in pressure ulcer severity and decreased health care costs.
  • Research is needed to determine the role of behavioural contingencies in pressure ulcer prevention post SCI.
  • Research is needed to determine why some individuals adhere to pressure ulcer prevention strategies and others do not.

Telerehabilitation and Pressure Ulcer Management Post SCI

Telerehabilitation is the use of telecommunication technology to deliver rehabilitation services at a distance” (Vesmarovich et al. 1999; p 264).  Telerehabilitation allows visual and verbal interaction between the individual with SCI and the health care provider.  Impaired mobility and distance to specialized SCI centers often make follow up care difficult for individuals with SCI (Mathewson et al. 2000; Galea et al. 2006).  Telerehabilation has the potential to deliver medical rehabilitation including education, nutritional and psychosocial elements of health care at a distance facilitating continuity of care (Galea et al. 2006).  Shorter lengths of stay have potentially increased the need for education post-discharge and technology can be used to continue education begun during inpatient rehabilitation including education on pressure ulcer prevention and care of ulcers if they occur.  Continuation of pressure ulcer prevention education and early detection and intervention via technology may reduce the need for hospitalization related to pressure ulcers (Phillips et al 2001).  The use of a videophone capable of transmitting high resolution images, and verbal interactions between nurse, patient and caregiver could mean accurate and timely assessment and treatment of wounds and improved healing (Mathewson et al 1999). In a study conducted at a mock home setting, Hill et al. (2009) found “video conferencing was better overall than the use of the telephone when assessing the detailed clinical characteristics of a pressure ulcer (p 200).” Both were found to be useful when assessing for the presence of a pressure ulcer.

Table 10 Telerehabilitation and Pressure Ulcer Management Post SCI

Discussion

Vesmarovich et al. (1999) described the use of telerehabilitation delivered via a videophone system that transmitted still images and audio to treat stage III and IV ulcers.  While no statistical results were reported, 7 out of 12 ulcer sites healed.

Philips et al. (1999) using the same videophone system divided SCI participants into 3 groups.  The videophone group had the highest number of identified and/or reported ulcers.  The annualized data for emergency room (ER) visits, hospitalizations and health care visits were similar for the video and telephone groups while hospitalizations and visits were less in the standard care group.  No differences were significant at p<0.05.

Results of these two small studies fail to support the use of telerehabilitation in delivery of cost effective prevention strategies and early pressure ulcer identification and treatment.  More research is needed to determine how telerehabilitation can be used to deliver and monitor compliance with pressure ulcer prevention strategies as well as its use in identification and treatment of pressure ulcers post SCI.

Conclusion

  • There is level 4 evidence that telerehabiliation does not make a significant difference in the prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers post SCI.  More research is needed into its effectiveness for improving healing and reducing costs.
  • Telerehabilitation’s role in delivering prevention education and treatment to those individuals with SCI living in the community is not yet proven. More research is needed.

Treatment


Electrical Stimulation for Pressure Ulcer Healing Post SCI

The use of various forms of electrical current in augmenting tissue repair was reported as early as the 1600’s when charged goldleaf was used to prevent scarring in smallpox survivors (Kloth & Feedar 1988).  The therapeutic effects of electrical stimulation for wound healing have been well documented since the 1960’s especially for wounds not responding to standard forms of treatment (Kloth & Feeder 1988; Baker et al. 1996; Bogie et al. 2000).

One theory as to why electrical stimulation is effective in promoting wound healing includes the possibility that the electrical current promotes migration of cells such as epithelial, macrophages, neutrophils and fibroblasts-galvanotaxis (Feedar et al. 1991; Baker et al. 1996; Bogie et al. 2000).  Under normal circumstances there is a flow of charged particles from an uninjured area to an injured area triggering a biological repair system.  The belief is that application of exogenous electrical current should be able to enhance healing in non-healing wounds by mimicking the body’s own healing system. (Carley & Wainapel 1985; Baker et al. 1996).  A second theory purports that application of electric current activates cutaneous nerves and creates a centrally mediated increase in circulation to the wound thereby promoting healing (Baker et al. 1996).  Despite the usage of electrical stimulation to promote wound healing, there remains a lack of clear understanding as to how it works to repair tissue (Bogie et al. 2000).

Some of the documented effects of electrical stimulation on wound healing include decreased healing time, increased collagen synthesis, increased wound tensile strength, increased rate of wound epithelialization and bactericidal effects (Kloth & Feedar 1988).  Electrical stimulation has also been shown to improve tissue perfusion and reduce edema formation indirectly stimulating healing by improving oxygen delivery to tissues (Houghton & Campbell 2007).  The studies on electrical stimulation for wound healing have looked at low intensity direct current, high voltage pulsed direct current, and alternating current.  The literature shows a high variability as to which protocols are the most effective for a specific patient or ulcer (Bogie et al. 2000). 

The use of electrical stimulation to promote closure of pressure ulcers when combined with standard wound interventions has been recommended in both the able bodied and spinal cord injured individual.  Most studies discuss the role of electrical stimulation in pressure ulcers which have failed to respond to standard treatments and electrical stimulation is seen as an adjunctive modality to standard wound treatments (Consortium of Spinal Cord Medicine 2000; Keast et al. 2006; AHCPR, Executive Summary # 15 1992).

Table 11 Electrical Stimulation for Pressure Ulcer Healing Post SCI

Discussion

Griffin et al. (1991) showed the efficacy of high voltage pulsed direct current (HVPC) for the healing of pelvic pressure ulcers in subjects with SCI.  When compared with the placebo group, the subjects healed with HVPC showed a greater percentage of change decrease in wound surface area (WSA) at day 5 (p=0.03), day 15 (p=0.05) and day 20 (p=0.05).  Several studies also reported similar findings (Stefanovska et al. 1993; Baker et al.1996; Adegoke & Badmos 2001).  Stefanovska et al. (1993) showed that the healing rate for wounds treated with low frequency pulsed current (AC) was significantly better than the groups treated with direct current or conventional treatment alone (p=0.003).  Baker et al. (1996) showed that for ulcers that responded to any form of electrical simulation (“good responses”), asymmetric biphasic stimulation (group A) was most effective for enhanced wound healing.  Wounds that were already showing healing in the control group, with the addition of either protocol A or B (symmetrical Biphasic) showed that healing rate was greater (43.3% Δ/week) when compared to control period (9.7% Δ/week).  Adegoke and Badmos (2001) showed that the surface area of grade IV pelvic pressure ulcers treated with interrupted direct current (IDC) and nursing care decreased by 22.2% versus 2.6% in the placebo group. Karba et al. (1997) demonstrated that when using direct current, placement of the positive stimulation electrode covering the pressure ulcer and the negative electrodes on intact skin resulted in a greater relative healing rate per day (7.4%, p=0.028) compared to when the positive and negative electrodes were both placed on intact skin on opposite sides across the wound (4.8%).

While there were differences in the type and duration of electric current applied in the 5 studies and in some cases, electrode placement, all demonstrated that when used in conjunction with standard wound management, electrical stimulation did accelerate the healing rate of pressure ulcers in patients with SCI.  More research is needed to determine which type of electric current and application protocol will be most useful to enhance healing of pressure ulcers post SCI.

Conclusion

  • There is level I evidence from 2 RCTs to support the use of electrical stimulation to accelerate the healing rate of stage III and IV pressure ulcers when combined with standard wound management.
  • Electrical stimulation should be added to standard wound management to promote healing of Stage III and IV pressure ulcers post SCI.
  • More research is needed to determine which type of electric current and application protocol will result in better healing of pressure ulcers post SCI.

Laser Treatment for Pressure Ulcer Healing Post SCI

Lasers have been used in the treatment of wounds since the 1970s.  Lasers are believed to exert their effects on the proliferative phase of wound healing, prompting fibroblast activity and granulation tissue formation in non-healing, chronic wounds.  Currently the use of laser to promote wound closure in chronic wounds is not supported by evidence (Houghton & Campbell 2007; Consortium of Spinal Cord Medicine 2000).  The two studies presented in this document support this conclusion.

Table 12 Laser Treatment for Pressure Ulcer Healing Post SCI

Discussion

Taly et al. (2004) studied 35 subjects (64 ulcers) using multi-wavelength light therapy compared to “standard” wound care alone.  Overall no significant differences were found between the two groups with regard to the number of ulcers healed and time taken to heal.

Nussbaum et al. (1994) studied 16 patients and compared standard wound care alone to standard care combined with either laser or Ultrasound/Ultraviolet C (US/UVC).  Results showed that laser treatment combined with standard wound care had the least effect on wound healing compared to the control group and US/UVC group.  A significant difference was found between the US/UVC and laser group with the US/UVC treatment showing the greater effect on wound healing.

Both of these studies demonstrated that laser treatment was no more effective in promoting wound healing than standard wound care alone post SCI.

Conclusion

  • There is level 1 evidence (from two RCTs) to suggest that laser treatment has no added benefit in pressure ulcer healing post SCI than standard wound care alone.
  • Laser treatment does not improve pressure ulcer healing post SCI.

Ultrasound/Ultraviolet C for Pressure Ulcer Healing Post SCI

Houghton and Campbell (2007) note that both ultrasound (US) and ultraviolet light C (UVC) have been used in the treatment of chronic wounds.  Ultrasound acts mainly at the “inflammatory stage of the wound healing cascade to stimulate the release of chemical mediators of cells which in turn produces changes in the amount and strength or integrity of the scar tissue” (p 409-410).  The bactericidal effects of UVC suggest that it is indicated for the treatment of chronic infected wounds where there is much surface bacteria or where bacteria have become resistant to antibiotic therapy.  The authors go on to say that there is research to support the use of UVC in the treatment of chronic infected wounds but that therapeutic US gave no added benefit when used to treat pressure ulcers.  The Consortium of Spinal Cord Medicine (2000) found minimal data specific to the use of US or UVC to treat pressure ulcers in SCI.  Schmuckler (2008) in a case series of 5 SCI patients with sacral pressure ulcers used low frequency, noncontact, nonthermal ultrasound (Acoutic Pressure Wound Therapy, MIST Therapy Systems) to prepare the wound bed for subsequent treatments. The author demonstrated that in 4 out of 5 wounds the therapy was effective in reducing slough and eschar, promoting granulation tissue and reducing wound area and volume. One small RCT will be discussed that combined US/UVC and compared its effects to laser and standard wound care.

Table 13 Ultrasound/Ultraviolet C for Pressure Ulcer Healing Post SCI

Discussion

In one small RCT (n=16) Nussbaum et al. (1994) demonstrated that when compared to standard wound care alone or laser combined with standard wound care, Ultrasound/Ultraviolet C (US/UVC) plus standard wound care showed a greater effect on wound healing in a shorter period of time.  As US/UVC was alternated over 5 days and seen as one treatment, conclusions cannot be drawn as to the individual effects of US or UVC.  More research is needed to study the effects of US and UVC (alone or in combination) on pressure ulcer healing post SCI.

Conclusion

  • There is level 1 evidence, from 1 small RCT, to suggest that combining US/UVC with standard wound care decreases wound healing time of pressure ulcers post SCI but no evidence to clarify whether UVC or US, used alone, have a beneficial effect.
  • US/UVC should be considered as an added treatment when pressure ulcers are not healing with standard wound care post SCI.

Effects of Non-Thermal Pulsed Electromagnetic Energy Treatment for Healing of Pressure Ulcers Post SCI

Keast et al. (2006)in updating best practices recommendations for the prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers, recommends considering electromagnetic fields as one adjunctive modality for stimulating closure of chronic non-healing pressure ulcers.  Electromagnetic energy is believed to act at the proliferative stage of wound healing to promote production of granulation tissue formation (Houghton & Campbell 2007). 

Table 14 Non-Thermal Pulsed Electromagnetic Energy for Healing of Pressure Ulcers Post SCI

Discussion

One RCT was found that studied the effects of electromagnetic energy on pressure ulcer healing in patients with SCI.  Salzberg et al. (1995) evaluated the effects of non-thermal pulsed electromagnetic energy (PEE) for healing of stage II and III ulcers in patients with SCI.  In the stage II treatment group (n=10), a greater proportion of ulcers healed (84%) after 1 week versus control (40%), p=0.01.  For complete healing, the treatment group healed in a median 13 days versus 31.5 days for controls (p<0.001).  In the stage III group, healing was also associated with PEE treatment.  3/5 ulcers healed on average within 43 days; while 0/5 healed in control group.  Ulcer area decreased 70.6% versus 20.7% in control group.

Olyaee Manesh et al. (2006) in a systematic review for the Cochrane Database looked at two articles, Salzburg et al. (1995) being one of them, and found that neither study found a statistically significant difference between the healing rate of people treated with electromagnetic therapy when compared to those in the control group.

More research is needed to further our understanding of the mechanism of action of PEE and its role in pressure ulcer healing in individuals post SCI.

Conclusion

  • There is level I evidence from one small RCT to support the efficacy of pulsed electromagnetic energy to accelerate healing of stage II and III pressure ulcers post SCI.
  • Pulsed electromagnetic energy improves wound healing in Stage II and Stage III pressure ulcers post SCI.

Topical Negative Pressure Therapy for Pressure Ulcer Healing Post SCI

Topical negative pressure therapy (TNP) distributes negative pressure (subatmospheric pressure) across an ulcer wound surface via a special dressing and can be applied continuously or intermittently.  The intent of TNP is to promote wound healing and it has been used to treat a variety of acute and chronic wounds including pressure ulcers (Smith et al 2007; Argenta & Morykwas 1997). An airtight system is created using special foam, sterile tubing and canister, and an adhesive film drape (Houghton & Campbell 2007).  Vacuum is applied via a suction bottle or pump (Műllner et al 1997).  The negative pressure in the wound bed increases blood flow, reduces local tissue edema, decreases bacterial colonization and increases granulation tissue formation and mechanical wound closure (Smith et al 2007; Houghton & Campbell 2007; Argenta & Morykwas 1997).

Table 15 Topical Negative Pressure Therapy for Pressure Ulcer Healing Post SCI

Discussion

Coggrave et al. (2002) applied topical negative pressure (TNP) continuously to pressure ulcers of seven individuals with SCI.  The TNP was applied to prepare the wound for surgical closure.  Treatment time varied from 11-73 days with percent decrease in wound volume varying from 33-96%.  Granulation tissue was seen to develop and bacterial colonization decreased in 5 cases. Given the small sample size and variable responses, more research is needed to determine the role of TNP as a treatment for pressure ulcers post SCI.

Conclusion

  • There is very limited level 4 evidence that topical negative pressure (TNP) improves healing of pressure ulcers post SCI.
Topical negative pressure (TNP) when applied to a pressure ulcer may improve healing post SCI. More research is needed.

Effects of Normothermic Dressing on Pressure Ulcer Healing Post SCI

Heat has been used for centuries because of its positive effects on wound healing (Kloth et al 2000). Heat when applied to healthy skin causes vasodilation resulting in an increase in blood flow and oxygen delivery to tissues (Rund & Sussman 2007).  This has lead to a belief by some, that these effects may be beneficial for wounds such as pressure ulcers where perfusion is compromised due to pressure (Kloth et al. 2000). Normothermia is the application of controlled levels of radiant-heat energy to a wound (Consortium of Spinal Cord Medicine 2000; Kloth et al. 2000).

Table 16 Effects of Normothermic Dressing in Pressure Ulcer Healing Post SCI

Discussion

Kloth et al. (2000) in a 4 week controlled trial of fifteen stage III and IV pressure ulcers, reported a 61% reduction in ulcer surface area for wounds treated with a normothermic dressing.  In the 6 control wounds treated with standard wound care, there was a 19% reduction in ulcer surface area.  Of the 21 wounds studied, 10 involved SCI patients.

Conclusion

  • There is very limited level 3 evidence that the use of a normothermic dressing may improve healing of pressure ulcers post SCI.
  • Use of a normothermic dressing may improve healing of pressure ulcers post SCI but more research is needed.

Recombinant Human Erythropoietin for Healing of Pressure Ulcers Post SCI

Chronic pressure ulcers result in not only a significant negative impact on the quality of life of persons who are living with these wounds but also in extensive economic costs to the individual and the health care system.  Chronic ulcers experienced by individuals with hemoglobin values less than 100 g/L may be difficult to heal because of impaired tissue oxygenation.  It is important to distinguish between iron deficiency anemia and anemia of chronic disease (ACD).  ACD occurs in individuals with chronic inflammatory and/or infectious processes; a chronic non-healing pressure ulcer is a chronic inflammatory condition.  ACD is thought to be the result of impaired red blood cell production because of persistent elevated levels of circulating inflammatory cytokines (Spivak 2002).  The endogenous hormone erythropoietin, and recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) play crucial roles in the regulation of hematopoiesis and induce red blood cell production.  It has direct hemodynamic and vasoactive effects and modulates the inflammatory process, thereby potentially reversing the conditions believed to underlie chronic pressure ulcers.  Treatment with rHuEPO has been shown to be effective in increasing hemoglobin values in five individuals with stage IV pressure ulcers related to ACD (Turba et al. 1992) and in the complete healing of a chronic leg ulcer in a single case report (Al-Momen 1991).  Few clinical studies have been performed that investigate the value of rHuEPO in the healing of chronic wounds.        

Table 17 Recombinant Human Erythropoietin for Healing of Pressure Ulcers Post SCI

Discussion

A retrospective chart review of 4 individuals with SCI and stage IV chronic pressure ulcers was performed by Keast and Fraser (2004).  Following treatment with 75 IU/kg of rHuEPO subcutaneously 3 times weekly for 6 weeks, the mean baseline hemoglobin for the 4 subjects increased from 88 g/L (+/- 7.4) to 110 g/L (+/- 3.7).  Mean ulcer surface area decreased from 42.3 cm2 (+/- 40.2) to 38.4 cm2 (+/- 44.3) over 6 weeks of treatment despite the fact that one of the subjects showed a significant increase in wound surface area as a result of surgical de-roofing performed to eliminate all undermining.  All subjects showed a decrease in the depth of the target ulcer from 2.3 cm (+/- 1.2) to 1.2 cm (+/- 1.0).  Observations suggested that some of the subjects demonstrated increased ability to fight recurrent infections; all subjects reported that they felt more energetic and better able to participate in their rehabilitation activities.  No adverse effects were observed.  Human recombinant erythropoietin shows promise not only in resolving the anemia of chronic disease associated with stage IV pressure ulcers but also in the healing of these wounds in persons with SCI.  Further study is warranted.    

Conclusion

  • There is very limited level 4 evidence suggesting the use recombinant human erythropoietin aids in the healing of stage IV chronic non-healing pressure ulcers post SCI.
  • Recombinant human erythropoietin shows promise in assisting with the healing of stage IV chronic non-healing pressure ulcers post SCI.

Anabolic Steroid Agents for Healing of Pressure Ulcers Post SCI

Impaired nutritional status and decreased nutritional intake are significantly associated with development and healing of pressure ulcers (Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine 2000).  Spungen et al. (2001) stated that use of anabolic steroids and increased protein intake have been associated with promoting anabolism, weight gain and in turn wound closure in burn patients.  Since a “hypermetabolic, potentially catabolic state also is associated with pressure ulcers” (p 140), the use of an anabolic steroid agent may also promote closure of nonhealing, pressure ulcers in the SCI population.

Table 18 Anabolic Steroid Agents for Healing of Pressure Ulcers Post SCI

Discussion

In a case series of nine subjects with stage III and IV pressure ulcers, Spungen et al. (2001) demonstrated complete healing in 8/9 subjects 3-12 months after daily administration of 20mg of oxandrolone. Given that this is only one small case series, more research is needed to determine the role of anabolic steroid agents (oxandrolone) for promotion of healing of stage III and IV pressure ulcers post SCI.

Conclusion

  • There is very limited level 4 evidence to support the use of anabolic steroid agents (oxandrolone) to promote healing of stage III and IV pressure ulcers post SCI.
  • Anabolic steroid agents may promote healing of serious pressure ulcers post SCI.

Effectiveness of Dressings for Treatment of Pressure Ulcers Post SCI

Dressings are one of several interventions required to treat a wound.  The appropriate choice of a dressing aids the body’s ability to heal a wound. Purposes of dressings include keeping the wound bed moist, removing excess exudate, providing a barrier against contamination and gas exchange. An appropriate dressing increases healing rate, reduces pain, and decreases infection rates while being cost effective and affordable (Broussard 2007).  Due to the estimated costs associated with pressure ulcers and their treatment, various dressings used with the SCI population have been investigated.

When hydrocolloid dressings are placed over a wound, the dressing absorbs the exudate and changes into a gel.  The outside of the dressing allows for gas exchange and protects against outside contamination. Hydrocolloid dressings maintain a moist wound environment and support autolytic debridment.  Dressings can be left in place for 3-5 days, decreasing time and costs (Heynemen et al. 2008; Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine 2000; Houghton & Campbell 2007).  Hydrocolloid dressings are typically used for stage II and III pressure ulcers (Heynemen et al. 2008).

Hydrogel dressings act to retain moisture and rehydrate wounds, provide autolytic debridment and fill dead space.  They provide minimal absorption of exudates. Hydrogel is available as a sheet or in an amorphous viscous form which requires a secondary dressing (Broussard 2007; Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine 2000). Dressings can be left in place for 48-72 hours depending on the type of hydrogel in use (Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine 2000; Broussard 2007).

Phenytoin is an anti-epileptic medication. The healing properties of topical phenytoin were first reported over 50 years ago. Over the years, various topical preparations of phenytoin have been studied and while its exact mechanism of action is unknown, it may enhance healing by stimulation of fibroblast proliferation, promotion of collagen deposition, antibacterial activity and decreased collagenase activity (Anstead et al. 1996; Hollisaz et al. 2004; Subbanna et al. 2007). It has not been widely used because its efficacy has not been sufficiently established through controlled clinical trials (Ovington 1999; Subbanna et al. 2007).

Table 19 Effectiveness of Dressingsfor Treatment of Pressure Ulcers Post SCI

Discussion

Hollisaz et al., in a RCT involving 83 subjects, found that those in the hydrocolloid dressing (HD) group (n=28) seemed to have the greatest completion of healing regardless of ulcer location and stage (74%, p<0.005), compared to those in the phenytoin cream (PC) group (40%, n=28) or simple dressing (SD) group (27%, n=27). For stage I ulcers, those in the HD group healed faster than those in the other two groups; however, for stage II ulcers, there was no difference in healing between the HD and PC groups (67% vs 48%, p>0.05). When looking at the area of injury, gluteal ulcers also healed more completely in the HD group than in the other two, whereas the healing of sacral ulcers did not differ between the 3 groups.

Subbanna et al. (2007) using a phenytoin solution (5mg/ml) found improvements in PUSH 3.0 and ulcer size when compared to normal saline but the differences did not reach statistical significance (p=0.261, p=0.132).

Whittle et al. (1996) treated 5 pressure ulcers (stage II-IV) with hydrogel dressings. After approximately 4-6 weeks of treatment, 3 ulcers healed completely with the others showing a large improvement.  Kaya et al. (2005) compared the effectiveness of applying an occlusive hydrogel type dressing to a poviodine-iodine soaked gauge dressing.  There were no statistically significant differences in rate of healing but significantly more ulcers healed with the hydrogel dressing

Conclusion

  • There is Level 1 evidence from a single RCT that completion of healing for stage I and II pressure ulcers is greater with an occlusive hydrocolloid dressing compared to phenytoin cream or simple dressing post SCI.
  • There is Level 2 evidence from a single, small RCT that occlusive hydrogel-type dressings heal more pressure ulcers than conservative treatment post SCI.
  • There is level 1 evidence that topical phenytoin shows a trend towards healing of stage I and II pressure ulcers post SCI.
  • Occlusive hydrocolloid dressings are useful for healing of stage I and II pressure ulcers post SCI.

Maggot Therapy for Healing of Pressure Ulcers Post SCI

The beneficial effects of fly larvae have been known for centuries.  The intentional use of fly larvae (maggot therapy) for the treatment of wounds was used extensively in the 1930s and 1940s but was discontinued when antimicrobials and surgical debridment were introduced. Maggot therapy (MT) was reintroduced to treat intractable wounds in the 1990s (Mumcuoglu et al. 1999). Sterilized larvae of the Phaenicia sericata species are often used for MT (Mymcuoglu et al. 1999; Sherman 2002). MT is believed to work through three processes: debridment of necrotic tissue, disinfection of the wound and promotion of tissue growth (Sherman 2002).

Table 20 Maggot Therapy for Healing of Pressure Ulcers Post SCI

Discussion

In one non-RCT conducted by Sherman et al. (1995), 8 of 20 patients diagnosed with stage III and IV pressure ulcers were treated with maggot therapy.  All 8 patients underwent 3 weeks of conventional treatment, followed by maggot therapy.  All necrotic wounds were debrided within one week of maggot treatment and wound healing was faster among the 8 who had received maggot therapy than in the 12 who had not.

Conclusion

  • There is Level 2 evidence from one very small study to support the use of maggot therapy as an adjunctive therapy for non-healing stage III and IV pressure ulcers post SCI.
  • Maggot therapy may be useful as an added treatment when stage III and IV pressure ulcers are not healing post SCI.

Topical Oxygen for Treatment of Pressure Ulcers Post SCI

Chronic hypoxia of a wound and periwound tissues is known to impede wound healing by impairing collagen formation, angiogenesis and epithelialization. Hypoxia also lowers a wounds resistance to infection (Stotts et al. 2007). Oxygen supply to chronic wounds has been augmented by treatment with systemic (hyperbaric) oxygen therapy or through a less studied modality, topical oxygen therapy (Stotts et al. 2007; Kalliainen et al. 2003). No controlled studies have looked at the efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen on the healing of pressure ulcers (Houghton & Campbell 2007; Consortium of Spinal Cord Medicine 2000). Kalliainen et al. 2003, in a case series analysis studied topical oxygen and its effects on the healing of chronic wounds, some of which were noted to be pressure ulcers but the exact number was not reported. 38 out of 58 wounds (65.5%) healed during treatment with topical oxygen alone but pressure ulcers were included in wounds found to be least responsive to topical oxygen.

Table 21 Topical Oxygen for Treatment of Pressure Ulcers Post SCI

Discussion

In one very small case series of 3 patients, Banks & Ho (2008) demonstrated that when topical oxygen (EpiFLO device) was applied to stage IV pelvic pressure ulcers, comparism of pre and post treatment linear measurements showed 49%, 48% and 31% improvement respectively from baseline. While a positive effect was shown, more research is needed to determine the role of topical oxygen therapy as a adjunctive therapy for the healing of pressure ulcers post SCI.

Conclusion

  • There is very limited level 4 evidence that topical oxygen therapy may improve healing of pressure ulcers post SCI.
  • Use of topical oxygen therapy may have a positive association with healing of pressure ulcers post SCI but more research is needed.

Summary

Numerous studies cited in this document have spoken to the fact that pressure ulcers, though largely preventable, are still a common, potentially serious lifelong secondary complication of SCI. Pressure ulcers have the potential to impact overall quality of life (Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine 2000), disrupt rehabilitation, vocational and educational pursuits and community reintegration (Fuhrer et al. 1993; Krause 1998; Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine 2000; Jones et al. 200), and lead to increased hospital readmission rates with longer lengths of stay (Chen 2005). Pressure ulcer prevention is more cost effective than treatment (Bogie et al. 2000; Jones et al. 2003). Despite the attention given to prevention strategies, pressure ulcers still occur.

Pressure ulcers are potentially preventable but without evidence to guide practice and education, pressure ulcers will continue to occur. Given the human and economic costs of pressure ulcer formation post SCI, more quality research needs to be done on all aspects of pressure ulcer prevention so that solid evidence is available to individuals with SCI, their families and health care providers.

There are several treatment interventions for pressure ulcers which are supported by level 1 evidence. These include: use of electrical stimulation, US/UVC and pulsed electromagnetic energy as adjunctive therapies and hydrocolloid dressings to assist with the complete healing of stage I and II pressure ulcers post SCI. Well reasoned treatment interventions supported by evidence should be incorporated into treatment plans for individuals with SCI who have pressure ulcers. Providing enhanced pressure ulcer education and structured follow-up has been shown to reduce recurrence of pressure ulcers post SCI.  

  • There is limited level 4 evidence that electrical stimulation decreases ischial pressures post SCI.
  • There is level 4 evidence that electrical stimulation may increase blood flow at sacral and gluteal areas post SCI.
  • There is level 3 evidence that 1-2 minutes of pressure relief must be sustained to raise tissue oxygen to unloaded levels.
  • There is level 4 evidence to support position changes to reduce pressure at the ischial tuberosities.
  • There is level 3 evidence that various cushions or seating systems (e.g. dynamic versus static) are associated with potentially beneficial reduction in seating interface pressure or pressure ulcer risk factors like skin temperature.
  • There is level 3 evidence that adding lumbar support to the wheelchair of those with chronic SCI has a negligible effect on reducing seated buttock pressures at the ischial tuberosities. 
  • There is Level 2 evidence showing that early attendance at specialized seating assessment clinics (SSA) increases the skin management abilities of individuals post SCI. 
  • There is Level 2 evidence that providing enhanced pressure ulcer prevention education is effective at helping individuals with SCI gain and retain this knowledge. 
  • There is level 1 evidence that providing enhanced pressure ulcer education and structured follow-up is effective in reducing recurrence of pressure ulcers especially in those individuals with no previous history of pressure ulcer surgery.
  • There is very limited level 4 evidence to suggest that the introduction of behavioural contingencies is associated with a reduction in pressure ulcer severity and decreased health care costs.
  • There is level 4 evidence that telerehabiliation does not make a significant difference in the prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers post SCI.  More research is needed into its effectiveness for improving healing and reducing costs.
  • There is level 1 evidence from 2 RCTs to support the use of electrical stimulation to accelerate the healing rate of stage III and IV pressure ulcers when combined with standard wound management.
  • There is level 1 evidence (from two RCTs) to suggest that laser treatment has no added benefit in pressure ulcer healing post SCI than standard wound care alone.
  • There is level 1 evidence, from 1 small RCT, to suggest that combining US/UVC with standard wound care decreases wound healing time of pressure ulcers post SCI but no evidence to clarify whether UVC or US, used alone, have a beneficial effect.
  • There is level 1 evidence from one RCT to support the efficacy of pulsed electromagnetic energy to accelerate healing of stage II and III pressure ulcers post SCI.
  • There is very limited level 4 evidence that topical negative pressure (TNP) improves healing of pressure ulcers post SCI.
  • There is very limited level 3 evidence that the use of a normothermic dressing may improve healing of pressure ulcers post SCI.
  • There is Level 2 evidence from one very small study to support the use of maggot therapy as an adjunctive therapy for non-healing stage III and IV pressure ulcers post SCI.
  • There is very limited level 4 evidence suggesting the use recombinant human erythropoietin aids in the healing of chronic non healing pressure ulcers in post SCI.
  • There is very limited level 4 evidence to support the use of anabolic steroid agents (oxandrolone) to promote healing of stage III and IV pressure ulcers post SCI.
  • There is Level 1 evidence from a single RCT that completion of healing for stage I and II pressure ulcers is greater with an occlusive hydrocolloid dressing compared to phenytoin cream or simple dressing post SCI.
  • There is Level 2 evidence from a single, small RCT that occlusive hydrogel-type dressings heal more pressure ulcers than conservative treatment post SCI.
  • There is level 1 evidence that topical phenytoin shows a trend towards healing of stage I and II pressure ulcers post SCI.
  • There is very limited level 4 evidence that topical oxygen therapy may improve healing of pressure ulcers post SCI.

Key Points

  • Electrical stimulation may decrease ischial pressures.
  • Electrical stimulation may increase blood flow to tissues.
  • More research is needed to see if decreasing ischial pressures and/or increasing blood flow to tissues will help prevent pressure ulcers post SCI.
  • 65° of tilt or forward leaning of >45° both showed significant reductions in pressure.
  • The type and duration of pressure relief by position changing must be individualized post SCI using pressure mapping or similar techniques.
  • More research is needed to see if decreasing ischial pressures and/or increasing blood flow to tissues using weight shifting techniques will help prevent pressure ulcers post SCI.
  • For most individuals with SCI, a pushup/vertical lift of 15-30 seconds is unlikely to be sufficient to allow for complete pressure relief.
  • No one cushion is suitable for all individuals with SCI.
  • Cushion selection should be based on a combination of pressure mapping results, clinical knowledge of prescriber, individual characteristics and preference.
  • More research is needed to see if decreasing ischial pressures or decreasing risk factors such as skin temperature via the use of specialty cushions will help prevent pressure ulcers post SCI.
  • Adding lumbar support to the wheelchairs of individuals with chronic SCI is unlikely to have a role in pressure ulcer prevention post SCI.
  • Early attendance at specialized seating assessment clinics (SSA) should be part of a comprehensive rehabilitation program.
  • More research is needed to determine if early attendance at a specialized seating assessment clinic results in pressure ulcer prevention over time.
  • Structured pressure ulcer prevention education, helps individuals post SCI gain and retain knowledge of pressure ulcer prevention practices.
  • More research is needed to determine the specific educational needs of individuals with SCI required to reduce the risk of pressure ulcer formation.
  • Research is needed to determine if pressure ulcer prevention education results in a reduction in the formation of pressure ulcers post SCI.
  • Research is needed to determine the role of behavioural contingencies in pressure ulcer prevention post SCI.
  • Research is needed to determine why some individuals adhere to pressure ulcer prevention strategies and others do not.
  • Telerehabilitation’s role in delivering prevention education and treatment to those individuals with SCI living in the community is not yet proven. More research is needed.
  • Electrical stimulation should be added to standard wound management to promote healing of Stage III and IV pressure ulcers post SCI.
  • More research is needed to determine which type of electric current and application protocol will result in better healing of pressure ulcers post SCI.
  • Laser treatment does not improve pressure ulcer healing post SCI.
  • US/UVC should be considered as an added treatment when pressure ulcers are not healing with standard wound care post SCI.
  • Pulsed electromagnetic energy improves wound healing in Stage II and Stage III pressure ulcers post SCI.
  • Topical negative pressure (TNP) when applied to a pressure ulcer may improve healing post SCI.  More research is needed.
  • Use of a normothermic dressing may improve healing of pressure ulcers post SCI but more research is needed.
  • Maggot therapy may be useful as an added treatment when stage III and IV pressure ulcers are not healing post SCI.
  • Recombinant human erythropoietin shows promise in assisting with the healing of chronic non-healing pressure ulcers post SCI.
  • Anabolic steroid agents may promote healing of serious pressure ulcers post SCI.
  • Occlusive hydrocolloid dressings are useful for healing of stage I and II pressure ulcers post SCI.
  • Use of topical oxygen therapy may have a positive association with healing of pressure ulcers post SCI but more research is needed.

References

  • Adegoke BO, Badmos KA. Acceleration of pressure ulcer healing in spinal cord injured patients using interrupted direct current. Afr J Med Med Sci 2001;30:195-197.
  • Agency for Health Care Quality and Research.  (AHCPR) Guideline 15: Treatment of Pressure Ulcers; 1992. www.guidelines.gov.
  • Agency for Health Care Quality and Research (AHCPR). Guideline 3: Pressure ulcers in adults: Prediction and Prevention; 1992. www.guidelines.gov
  • Alexander LR, Spungen AM, Liu MH, Losada M, Bauman WA. Resting metabolic rate in subjects with paraplegia: the effect of pressure sores. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 1995;76:819-22.
  • Al-Momen AK. Recombinant human erythropoietin induced rapid healing of a chronic leg ulcer in a patient with sickle cell disease. Acta Haematol 1991;86:46-48.
  • Allen J, Houghton PE. A case study for Electrical Stimulation on a stage III pressure ulcer. Wound Care Canada 2003;2:34-36.
  • Anstead GM, Hart LM, Fong Sunahara J, Liter ME. Phenytoin in wound healing. Annals of Pharm 1996;30:768-775.
  • Argenta LC, Morykwas MJ. Vacuum-assisted closure: a new method for wound control and treatment: clinical experience. Ann Plast Surg 1997;38:563-576.
  • Ash D. An exploration of the occurrence of pressure ulcers in a British spinal injuries unit. J Clin Nurs 2002;11:470-478.
  • Ayello EA, Braden B. How and why to do pressure ulcer risk assessment. Adv Skin Wound Care 2002;15:125-131.
  • Baker LL, Rubayi S, Villar F, Demuth SK. Effect of electrical stimulation waveform on healing of ulcers in human beings with spinal cord injury. Wound Repair Regen 1996;4:21-28.
  • Banks, PG, Ho, CH.. A novel topical oxygen treatment for chronic and difficult-to-heal wounds: case studies. Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine 2008; 31:297-301
  • Bergstrom N, Braden BJ, Laguzza A, Holman V. The Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk. Nurs Res 1987;36:205-210.
  • Black J, Baharestani M, Cuddigan J, Dorner B, Edsberg L, Langemo D, Posthauer ME, Ratliff C, Taler G. National pressure ulcer advisory panel’s updated pressure ulcer staging system. Urol Nurs. 2007;27:144-150.
  • Bogie KM, Nuseibeh I, Bader DL. Early progressive changes in tissue viability in the seated spinal cord injured subject. Paraplegia 1995;33:141-147.
  • Bogie KM, Reger SI, Levine SP, Sahgal V. Electrical stimulation for pressure sore prevention and wound healing. Assist Technol 2000;12:50-66.
  • Bogie KM, Triolo RJ. Effects of regular use of neuromuscular electrical stimulation on tissue health. J Rehabil Res Dev 2003;40:469-475.
  • Bogie KM, Wang X, Triolo RJ. Long-term prevention of pressure ulcers in high-risk patients: a single case study of the use of gluteal neuromuscular electric stimulation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006;87:585-591.
  • Brienza DM, Karg PE. Seat cushion optimization: a comparison of interface pressure and tissue stiffness characteristics for spinal cord injured and elderly patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998;79:388-394.
  • Broussard CL. (2007) Dressing Decisions. In: Krasner DL, Rodeheaver GT, Sibbald RG, editors. Chronic Wound Care: A Clinical Source Book for Healthcare Professionals. Malvern, PA: HMP Communications, 249-262.
  • Burns SP, Betz KL. Seating pressures with conventional and dynamic wheelchair cushions in tetraplegia. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 1999;80:566-571.
  • Byrne DW, Salzberg CA. Major risk factors for pressure ulcers in the spinal cord disabled: a literature review. Spinal Cord 1996;34:255-263.
  • Carley PJ, Wainapel SF. Electrotherapy for acceleration of wound healing: low intensity direct current. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1985;66:443-446.
  • Chen Y, DeVivo MJ, Jackson AB. Pressure ulcer prevalence in people with spinal cord injury: age-period-duration effects. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86:1208-1213.
  • Clark FA, Jackson JM, Scott MD, Carlson ME, Atkins MS, Uhles-Tanaka D et al. Data-based models of how pressure ulcers develop in daily-living contexts of adults with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006;87:1516-1525.
  • Coggrave M, West H, Leonard B. Topical negative pressure for pressure ulcer management. Br J Nurs 2002;11(6 Suppl):S29-S36.
  • Coggrave MJ, Rose LS. A specialist seating assessment clinic: changing pressure relief practice. Spinal Cord 2003;41:692-695.
  • Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine. Pressure ulcer prevention and treatment following spinal cord injury: A clinical practice guideline for health care professionals.  1-77. 2000.
  • Crenshaw RP, Vistnes LM. A decade of pressure sore research: 1977-1987. J Rehabil Res Dev 1989;26:63-74.
  • DeLisa JA, Mikulic MA. Pressure Ulcers. What do we do if preventive management fails. Pressure Ulcers 1985;77:209-212.
  • Dover H, Pickard W, Swain I, Grundy D. The effectiveness of a pressure clinic in preventing pressure sores. Paraplegia 1992;30:267-272.
  • Dunn CA, Carlson M, Jackson JM, Clark FA. Response factors surrounding progression of pressure ulcers in community-residing adults with spinal cord injury. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 2009;63:301-9.
  • Feedar JA, Kloth LC, Gentzkow GD. Chronic dermal ulcer healing enhanced with monophasic pulsed electrical stimulation. Phys Ther 1991;71:639-649.
  • Fisher SV, Szymke TE, Apte SY, Kosiak M. Wheelchair cushion effect on skin temperature. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1978;59:68-72.
  • Fleck CA, Sprigle S. (2007) Support Surfaces: Tissue Integrity, Terms, Principles, and Choice. In: Krasner DL, Rodeheaver GT, Sibbald RG, editors. Chronic Wound Care: A Clinical Source Book for Healthcare Professionals. Malvern, PA: HMP Communications, 629-640.
  • Fuhrer MJ, Garber SL, Rintala DH, Clearman R, Hart KA. Pressure ulcers in community-resident persons with spinal cord injury: prevalence and risk factors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993;74:1172-1177.
  • Galea M, Tumminia J, Garback LM. Telerehabilitation in spinal cord injury persons: a novel approach. Telemed J E Health 2006;12:160-162.
  • Garber SL. Wheelchair cushions for spinal cord-injured individuals. Am J Occup Ther 1985;39:722-725.
  • Garber SL, Rintala DH, Rossi CD, Hart KA, Fuhrer MJ. Reported pressure ulcer prevention and management techniques by persons with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996;77:744-749.
  • Garber SL, Rintala DH, Holmes SA, Rodriguez GP, Friedman J. A structured educational model to improve pressure ulcer prevention knowledge in veterans with spinal cord dysfunction. J Rehabil Res Dev 2002;39:575-588.
  • Garber SL, Reddy NP, McLane K.M., Krouskop TA. (2007) The Role of Technology in Pressure Ulcer Prevention. In: Krasner DL, Rodeheaver GT, Sibbald RG, editors. Chronic Wound Care: A Clinical Source Book for Healthcare Professionals. Malvern, PA: HMP Communications, 653-660.
  • Gilsdorf P, Patterson R, Fisher S. Thirty-minute continuous sitting force measurements with different support surfaces in the spinal cord injured and able-bodied. J Rehabil Res Dev 1991;28:33-38.
  • Griffin JW, Tooms RE, Mendius RA, Clifft JK, Vander ZR, El Zeky F et al. Efficacy of high voltage pulsed current for healing of pressure ulcers in patients with spinal cord injury. Phys Ther 1991;71:433-444.
  • Guihan M, Smith BM, LaVela SL, Garber SL. Factors predicting pressure ulcers in veterans with spinal cord injuries. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 2008;87:750-7.
  • Henderson JL, Price SH, Brandstater ME, Mandac BR. Efficacy of three measures to relieve pressure in seated persons with spinal cord injury. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 1994;75:535-539.
  • Heyneman A, Beele H, Vanderwee K, Defloor T. A systematic review of the use of hydrocolloids in the treatment of pressure ulcers. J Clin Nurs 2008;17:1164-1173.
  • Hill, M. L., Cronkite, R. C., Ota, D. T., Yao, E. C., & Kiratli, B. J. (2009). Validation of home telehealth for pressure ulcer assessment: a study in patients with spinal cord injury. Journal of Telemedicine & Telecare;15:196-202.
  • Hobson DA. Comparative effects of posture on pressure and shear at the body-seat interface. J Rehabil Res Dev 1992;29:21-31.
  • Hollisaz MT, Khedmat H, Yari F. A randomized clinical trial comparing hydrocolloid, phenytoin and simple dressings for the treatment of pressure ulcers [ISRCTN33429693]. BMC Dermatol 2004;4:18.
  • Houghton PE, Campbell KE. (2007) Therapeutic Modalities in the Treatment of Chronic Recalcitrant Wounds. In: Krasner DL, Rodeheaver GT, Sibbald RG, editors. Chronic Wound Care: A Clinical Source Book for Healthcare Professionals. Malvern, PA: HMP Communications, 403-415.
  • Houghton PE, Fraser CH. Biomarkers that predict response to adjunctive therapies in people with spinal cord injury. Proceedings of World Union of Wound Healing Societies . 2008.
  • Jones ML, Mathewson CS, Adkins VK, Ayllon T. Use of behavioral contingencies to promote prevention of recurrent pressure ulcers. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003;84:796-802.
  • Kalliainen LK, Gordillo GM, Schlanger R, Sen CK. Topical oxygen as an adjunct to wound healing: a clinical case series. Pathophysiology 2003; 9:81-87.
  • Karba, R., Semrov, D., Vodovnik, L., Benko, H., & Savrin, R. DC electrical stimulation for chronic wound healing enhancement. Part 1. Clinical study and determination of electrical field distribution in the numerical wound model. Bioelectrochemistry and Bioenergetics.1997;43:265-270.
  • Kaya AZ, Turani N, Akyuz M. The effectiveness of a hydrogel dressing compared with standard management of pressure ulcers. Journal of Wound Care 2005;14:42-44.
  • Keast DH, Fraser C. Treatment of chronic skin ulcers in individuals with anemia of chronic disease using recombinant human erythropoietin (EPO): a review of four cases. Ostomy Wound Manage 2004;50:64-70.
  • Keast DH, Parslow N, Houghton PE, Norton L, Fraser C. Best practice recommendations for the prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers: Update 2006. Wound Care Canada 2006;22-32.
  • Kennedy P, Berry C, Coggrave M, Rose L, Hamilton L. The effect of a specialist seating assessment clinic on the skin management of individuals with spinal cord injury. J Tissue Viability 2003;13:122-125.
  • King RB, Porter SL, Vertiz KB. Preventive skin care beliefs of people with spinal cord injury. Rehabilitation Nursing 2008;33:154-62.
  • Kloth LC, Feedar JA. Acceleration of wound healing with high voltage, monophasic, pulsed current. Phys Ther 1988;68:503-508.
  • Kloth LC, Berman JE, Dumit-Minkel S, Sutton CH, Papanek PE, Wurzel J. Effects of a normothermic dressing on pressure ulcer healing. Adv Skin Wound Care 2000;13:69-74.
  • Krause JS. Skin sores after spinal cord injury: relationship to life adjustment. Spinal Cord 1998;36:51-56.
  • Krause JS, Vines CL, Farley TL, Sniezek J, Coker J. An exploratory study of pressure ulcers after spinal cord injury: relationship to protective behaviors and risk factors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82:107-113.
  • Krause JS, Broderick L. Patterns of recurrent pressure ulcers after spinal cord injury: identification of risk and protective factors 5 or more years after onset. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:1257-1264.
  • Lamid S, El Ghatit AZ. Smoking, spasticity and pressure sores in spinal cord injured patients. Am J Phys Med 1983;62:300-306.
  • Levine SP, Kett RL, Cederna PS, Brooks SV. Electric muscle stimulation for pressure sore prevention: tissue shape variation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1990;71:210-215.
  • Lui QL, Nicholson GP, Knight SL, Chelvarajah R, Gall A, Middleton FRI, Ferguson-Pell MW, Craggs MD. Pressure changes under the ischial tuberosities of seated individuals during sacral nerve root stimulation. J Rehabil Res Dev 2006b;43:209-218.
  • Lui QL, Nicholson GP, Knight SL, Chelvarajah R, Gall A, Middleton FRI, Ferguson-Pell MW, Craggs MD. Interface pressure and cutaneous hemoglobin and oxygenation changes under ischial tuberosities during sacral nerve root stimulation in spinal cord injury. J Rehabil Res Dev 2006a;43:553-564.
  • Makhsous M, Rowles DM, Rymer WZ, Bankard J, Nam EK, Chen D et al. Periodically relieving ischial sitting load to decrease the risk of pressure ulcers. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007b;88:862-870.
  • Makhsous M, Priebe M, Bankard J, Rowles D, Zeigler M, Chen D et al. Measuring tissue perfusion during pressure relief maneuvers: insights into preventing pressure ulcers. J Spinal Cord Med 2007a;30:497-507.
  • Mathewson C, Adkins VK, Lenyoun MA, Schmidt AM, Jones ML. Using telemedicine in the treatment of pressure ulcers. Ostomy Wound Manage 1999;45:58-62.
  • Mathewson C, Adkins VK, Jones ML. Initial experiences with telerehabilitation and contingency management programs for the prevention and management of pressure ulceration in patients with spinal cord injuries. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2000;27:269-271.
  • Mawson AR, Siddiqui FH, Connolly BJ, Sharp CJ, Stewart GW, Summer WR et al. Effect of high voltage pulsed galvanic stimulation on sacral transcutaneous oxygen tension levels in the spinal cord injured. Paraplegia 1993;31:311-319.
  • Mortenson WB, Miller WC. A review of scales for assessing the risk of developing a pressure ulcer in individuals with SCI. Spinal Cord 2008;46:168-175.
  • Mullner T, Mrkonjic L, Kwasny O, Vecsei V. The use of negative pressure to promote the healing of tissue defects: a clinical trial using the vacuum sealing technique. Br J Plast Surg 1997;50:194-199.
  • Mumcuoglu KY, Ingber A, Gilead L, Stessman J, Friedmann R, Schulman H et al. Maggot therapy for the treatment of intractable wounds. Int J Dermatol 1999;38:623-627.
  • National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel. Pressure Ulcer Stages. NPUAP http://npuap.org/positn6.htm. 1989; Last accessed: 7-15-2005.
  • National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel. Pressure Ulcer Stages Revised by NPUAP. NPUAP http://www.npuap.org/pr2.htm. 2007; Last accessed: 9-18-2007.
  • Niazi ZB, Salzberg CA, Byrne DW, Viehbeck M. Recurrence of initial pressure ulcer in persons with spinal cord injuries. Adv Wound Care 1997;10:38-42.
  • Nursing Best Practice Guideline: Assessment and management of stage 1 to IV pressure ulcers.  Toronto. RNAO 2002.  www.rnao.org/bestpractices
  • Nussbaum EL, Biemann I, Mustard B. Comparison of ultrasound/ultraviolet-C and laser for treatment of pressure ulcers in patients with spinal cord injury. Phys Ther 1994;74:812-823.
  • Olyaee, M. A., Flemming, K., Cullum, N. A., & Ravaghi, H. Electromagnetic therapy for treating pressure ulcersCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2001;CD002930
  • Ovington LG. Dressings and ajunctive therapies: AHCPR guidelines revisited. Ostomy Wound Manage 1999;45:94S-106S
  • Phillips VL, Temkin A, Vesmarovich S, Burns R, Idleman L. Using telehealth interventions to prevent pressure ulcers in newly injured spinal cord injury patients post-discharge. Results from a pilot study. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1999;15:749-755.
  • Phillips VL, Vesmarovich S, Hauber R, Wiggers E, Egner A. Telehealth: reaching out to newly injured spinal cord patients. Public Health Rep 2001;116 Suppl 1:94-102.
  • Rappl LM. Physiological changes in tissues denervated by spinal cord injury tissues and possible effects on wound healing. International Wound Journal 2008;5:435-44.
  • Reger SI, Ranganathan VK, Sahgal V. Support surface interface pressure, microenvironment, and the prevalence of pressure ulcers: an analysis of the literature. Ostomy Wound Management 2007;53:50-8.
  • Richards JS, Waites K, Chen YY, Kogos K, Schumitt MM. The epidemiology of secondary conditions following spinal cord injury. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 2004;10:15-29.
  • Rintala, D. H., Garber, S. L., Friedman, J. D., & Holmes, S. A. Preventing recurrent pressure ulcers in veterans with spinal cord injury: impact of a structured education and follow-up intervention. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation. 2008;89:1429-1441
  • Rodriguez GP, Garber SL. Prospective study of pressure ulcer risk in spinal cord injury patients. Paraplegia 1994;32:150-158.
  • Rund C, Sussman G. (2007) Nontraditional or Alternative Topical Therapies for Wound Care. In: Krasner DL, Rodeheaver GT, Sibbald RG, editors. Chronic Wound Care: A Clinical Source Book for Healthcare Professionals. Malvern, PA: HMP Communications, 287-295.
  • Salzberg CA, Cooper-Vastola SA, Perez F, Viehbeck MG, Byrne DW. The effects of non-thermal pulsed electromagnetic energy on wound healing of pressure ulcers in spinal cord-injured patients: a randomized, double-blind study. Ostomy Wound Manage 1995;41:42-4, 46, 48.
  • Saladin LK, Krause JS. Pressure ulcer prevalence and barriers to treatment after spinal cord injury: comparisons of four groups based on race-ethnicity. Neurorehabilitation 2009;24:57-66.
  • Salzberg CA, Byrne DW, Cayten CG, van Niewerburgh P, Murphy JG, Viehbeck M. A new pressure ulcer risk assessment scale for individuals with spinal cord injury. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1996;75:96-104.
  • Schmuckler J. Acoustic pressure wound therapy to facilitate granulation tissue in sacral pressure ulcers in patients with compromised mobility: A case series. Ostomy Wound Management 2008;54:50-53.
  • Schryvers OI, Stranc MF, Nance PW. Surgical treatment of pressure ulcers: 20-year experience. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000;81:1556-1562.
  • Schubart JR, Hilgart M, Lyder C. Pressure ulcer prevention and management in spinal cord-injured adults: analysis of educational needs. Adv Skin Wound Care 2008;21:322-329.
  • Scivoletto G, Fuoco U, Morganti B, Cosentino E, Molinari M. Pressure sores and blood and serum dysmetabolism in spinal cord injury patients. Spinal Cord 2004;42:473-476.
  • Seymour RJ, Lacefield WE. Wheelchair cushion effect on pressure and skin temperature. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1985;66:103-108.
  • Sheppard R, Kennedy P, Mackey CA. Theory of planned behaviour, skin care and pressure sores following spinal cord injury. J. Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2006;13:359-367.
  • Sherman RA, Wyle F, Vulpe M. Maggot therapy for treating pressure ulcers in spinal cord injury patients. J Spinal Cord Med 1995;18:71-74.
  • Sherman RA. Maggot versus conservative debridement therapy for the treatment of pressure ulcers. Wound Repair Regen 2002;10:208-214.
  • Shields RK, Cook TM. Lumbar support thickness: effect on seated buttock pressure in individuals with and without spinal cord injury. Phys Ther 1992;72:218-226.
  • Smith APS, Kieswetter K, Goodwin AL, McNulty AK. (2007) Negative Pressure Wound Therapy. In: Krasner DL, Rodeheaver GT, Sibbald RG, editors. Chronic Wound Care: A Clinical Source Book for Healthcare Professionals. Malvern, PA: HMP Communications, 271-286.
  • Spijkerman, D. C. M., Terburg, M., Goossens, R. H. M., & Stijnen, T. (1995). Effects of inflation pressure and posture on the body-seat interface pressure of spinal cord injured patients seated on an air-filled wheelchair cushion. Journal of Rehabilitation Sciences. 1995;8:8-12.
  • Spivak JL. Iron and the anemia of chronic disease. Oncology (Williston Park) 2002;16(9 Suppl 10):25-33.
  • Sprigle S, Chung KC, Brubaker CE. Factors affecting seat contour characteristics. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1990;27:127-134.
  • Spungen AM, Koehler KM, Modeste-Duncan R, Rasul M, Cytryn AS, Bauman WA. 9 clinical cases of nonhealing pressure ulcers in patients with spinal cord injury treated with an anabolic agent: a therapeutic trial. Adv Skin Wound Care 2001;14:139-144.
  • Stefanovska A, Vodovnik L, Benko H, Turk R. Treatment of chronic wounds by means of electric and electromagnetic fields. Part 2. Value of FES parameters for pressure sore treatment. Med Biol Eng Comput 1993;31:213-220.
  • Stotts NA, Wipke-Tevis DD, Hopf HW. (2007) Cofactors in impaired wound healing. In: Krasner DL, Rodeheaver GT, Sibbald RG, editors. Chronic Wound Care: A clinical Source Book for Healthcare Professionals. Malvern, PA: HMP Communications. pg 215-220.
  • Subbanna, P. K., Margaret Shanti, F. X., George, J., Tharion, G., Neelakantan, N., Durai, S. et al. Topical phenytoin solution for treating pressure ulcers: A prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial. Spinal Cord. 2007;45:739-743
  • Takechi, H. & Tokuhiro, A. Evaluation of wheelchair cushions by means of pressure distribution mapping. Acta Medica Okayama. 1998;52:245-254.
  • Taly AB, Sivaraman Nair KP, Murali T, John A. Efficacy of multiwavelength light therapy in the treatment of pressure ulcers in subjects with disorders of the spinal cord: A randomized double-blind controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:1657-1661.
  • Turba RM, Lewis VL, Green D. Pressure sore anemia: response to erythropoietin. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1992;73:498-500.
  • Vesmarovich S, Walker T, Hauber RP, Temkin A, Burns R. Use of telerehabilitation to manage pressure ulcers in persons with spinal cord injuries. Adv Wound Care 1999;12:264-269.
  • Vidal J, Sarrias M. An analysis of the diverse factors concerned with the development of pressure sores in spinal cord injured patients. Paraplegia 1991;29:261-267.
  • Whittle H, Fletcher C, Hoskin A, Campbell K. Nursing management of pressure ulcers using a hydrogel dressing protocol: four case studies. Rehabil Nurs 1996;21:239-242.
  • Yuen HK, Garrett D. Comparison of three wheelchair cushions for effectiveness of pressure relief. Am J Occup Ther 2001;55:470-475.

Primary Care

Introduction

Primary care has been shown worldwide to be one of the most significant factors in maintaining the health of individuals and populations (Starfield 1997).  In recent years, there has been a renewal and reshaping of primary care around the world, with an unprecedented emphasis on funding models, accessibility and quality.  In the last decade, there has been an increased interest in the role and effectiveness of primary care in spinal cord injury.   However in most typical primary care practices, there are only a handful of patients with spinal cord injuries, and there is considerable uncertainty among family physicians about how to provide them with an optimal standard of care (Holcomb 2008; McColl et al. 2008; Middleton 2008; Potter 2004; Stanley 1981).

Family physicians play a key role in maintaining the health of people with spinal cord injuries.  According to Bluestein (1988), family physicians play an important coordinating role, acting as a link between the spinal cord injured patient and multiple health care providers. The family physician also acts as a patient advocate, and as a central clearinghouse for information.  Kroll and Neri (2008) and Holcomb (2008) discuss the essential role that family physicians play in health maintenance and promotion for patients with spinal cord injuries, particularly with regard to routine age and sex-appropriate preventive health care.  Family physicians are often conflicted in the expectation that they will provide a gatekeeper role in the health care system (Batavia, 1999).  They are simultaneously expected to be the patient’s carer, supporter and advocate, while at the same time screening patients for access to specialists, programs and benefits. 

Primary care is good, economical, holistic care, but the literature suggests that family medicine does not serve patients with spinal cord injuries as well as other patients.  What are the barriers to providing optimal care?  Are they physical, knowledge-based, attitudinal or systemic (McColl et al. 2009)?  People with spinal cord injuries report that family physicians typically lack the specific expertise necessary to provide them with optimal primary care (Kroll et al. 2003; Batavia 1999; Tolbert 2002; Stanley 1981).  Several approaches have been tried to remedy this problem.  Some authors favour multidisciplinary approaches, where nurses and other rehabilitation specialists work in collaboration with the family physician.  Bernardez (1994) recommends specially trained physician assistants; however, physician assistants are neither available nor registered to practice in many countries outside of the US.  Holcomb (2008) recommends specialist community-based nurses as adjuncts to family physician care.  Of note, he argues against the use of medical specialists (such as physiatrists) as a substitute to good community-based primary care.  Scarcity, geographical mal-distribution, and lack of training in health promotion and illness prevention mitigate against the utility of specialists as primary care providers for the SCI patient.

A series of articles have been written as primers to family physicians who may have a patient with a spinal cord injury in their practice (Tepperman 1989; Stanley 1981; Middleton et al. 2008a & b; Brooker 1999).  Groah (2002) offers a self-training module with 4 case studies.  Mann, Middleton and Leong (2007) offer an assessment tool for improving health care to people with spinal cord injuries. 

This review outlines empirical evidence regarding primary care for adults with spinal cord injuries. In order to develop a more comprehensive analyses of this material, the methods used expanded upon those traditionally used for the other SCIRE reviews (see SCIRE Methods). Specifically, two new databases with a focus on the social sciences were searched (Social Sciences Abstracts, and Social Work Abstracts), and the inclusion criteria was broadened to include any relevant qualitative studies.

This literature has been divided into three subsections: 1) access and utilization; 2) outreach program; and 3) health issues.

McColl MA, Aiken A, McColl A, Smith K (2010). Primary Care for People with SCI. In: Eng JJ, Teasell RW, Miller WC, Wolfe DL, Townson AF, Hsieh JTC, Connolly SJ, Mehta S, Sakakibara BM, editors. Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Evidence. Volume 3.0. Vancouver: p. 1-24.

Access and utilization issues for primary care of adults with SCI

Access to primary care has been a key health issues in many jurisdictions in recent years.  However typically when the media refer to access, they mean issues like wait times, geographical distribution and supply of providers.  However for people with spinal cord injuries, there is another layer of access issues – the simple ability to enter and use the facilities of the practice, and the ability to receive an appropriate standard of care.  Thus, whereas access issues may delay and inconvenience patients in the general population, for patients with disabilities, access issues can actually prevent care.  This section summarizes the findings of 11 studies that provide information on access and utilization of primary care among adults with SCI.

Table 1: Access and utilization issues for primary care of adults with SCI

Discussion

Donnelly and colleagues (2007) and Bockeneck (1997) agree that most people with spinal cord injuries (approximately 90%) have access to primary care; that is, they identify a family physician who is their regular doctor.  These results came from surveys of people with long-standing spinal cord injuries in the US, Canada and Great Britain.

In a Dutch sample, van Loo and associates (2009) found that 77% of their community-dwelling sample with spinal cord injuries of average 13 years duration had contacted their family physician in the past year for an issue related to their disability.  Glickman and associates (1996), in a survey of primary care providers in England, found that on average, patients with SCI attended their clinics 4 times per year, with an additional 4.5 home visits made by the family doctor, and as many as 51 home visits made by other members of the health care team working out of the primary care setting.  This finding highlights the extensive network of community rehabilitation available in the UK.  Munce and colleagues (2009), focusing on the Canadian context, found that women tend to make more visits to their family physician than men; however, very high utilization of primary care (more than 50 visits per year) was related to being over 70 years of age, having significant  complications, and living in a chronic care facility. 

Bockeneck (1997) surveyed patients attending outpatient clinics in the US, and found that 50% considered their physiatrist as their family physician, and were happy to receive their primary care at the rehabilitation centre.  Warms (1987) also found that more than half of community-dwelling adults with SCI in the US received primary care from their physiatrist.  However, in a survey of physiatrists treating patients with spinal cord injuries, Francisco and colleagues (1995) found that only 40% of physiatrists were willing to assume this role, and 53% believed that physiatrists were competent to fulfill this role.  Only 38% felt that their residency training had adequately equipped them to provide primary care. 

Donnelly and others (2007) found that 63% of their international sample had a spinal cord injury specialist or physiatrist; 56% had both SCI specialist and family doctor, and only 1% had neither.  Beatty and colleagues (2003) found that 57% of those surveyed with an SCI reported a need for specialist care, but 25% had unmet needs.  With regard to specialist visits, Munce and colleagues (2009) found that Canadians with SCI were most likely to be high users of specialist services if they were younger and if they lived in chronic care.  Both Bockeneck (1997) and van Loo and associates (2009) found that patients preferred specialist care, and were most happy to receive their follow-up care from rehabilitation specialists rather than community care.

Donnelly and colleagues (2007) show that people with long-term spinal cord injuries develop complex rubrics for navigating their personal health care systems.  There is considerable confusion about which issues are most appropriate to bring to the family physician versus the physiatrist, and there are significant international differences in who does what.  Beatty and colleagues (2003) surveyed adults with a variety of disabilities in the US, and found that about 63% of those with SCI indicated a need for primary care, while 33% reported an unmet need for primary care (meaning a self-report of service needed but not received).  A troubling finding of the same study was that unmet needs were greatest among those with the poorest health and lowest incomes.  van Loo et al. (2009) reported that 72% of their sample reported unmet needs, particularly related to rehabilitation consultation, telephone consults and home visits.

The most prevalent impediment to accessible primary care is the need for specialized expertise in order to adequately serve as the first line provider for patients with spinal cord injuries.  In Australia, Cox and associates (2000) found that 81% of people living in the community with SCI reported limited local provider expertise; 25% indicated a high need for specialist outreach services.  Goetz and colleagues (2005) show that clinical guidelines for specialized primary care can improve outcomes for people with spinal cord injuries, but that adherence to guidelines does not necessarily follow publication.  They describe strategies, such as improved documentation forms and procedural flowsheets, which significantly increased adherence and promoted improved care. 

Donnelly and colleagues (2007) noted that physical accessibility of the office and equipment could be an issue in primary care.  These results came from surveys of people with long-standing spinal cord injuries in the US, Canada and Great Britain.  Munce et al (2009) noted that geography might be an impediment to access, since emergency room visits were twice as common for those living in rural areas.  In the absence of a local family practice, patients might be more inclined to attend the emergency department of a local hospital.  Often in rural areas, family physicians provide the medical service in emergency rooms after hours, and the central location of the emergency department in a rural community may provide easier access for patients. Cox and colleagues (2000) found that home visits and telephone consultations were preferred methods for increasing accessibility to primary care.

According to Donnelly and colleagues (2007) satisfaction was high (~75%) with quality and accessibility of care for both family physicians and rehabilitation specialists.  One program where satisfaction was particularly high was the annual Comprehensive Preventive Health Evaluation (CPHE; Colllins 2005).  In a large sample of American veterans with SCI, compliance with CPHE was related to having health needs and issues successfully addressed.  van Loo and colleagues (2009) found that 23% of visits to family physicians in their sample were to obtain annual follow-up.

Conclusions

  • There is level 4 evidence that GP utilization is related to older age, complications and chronic care living (Munce et al. 2009)
  • There is level 4 evidence that individuals living in more rural areas are twice as likely to visit the Emergency Department than those living in cities (Munce et al. 2009).
  • There is level 4 evidence that clinician adherence to bowel and bladder guidelines improves with targeted implementation plan (Goetz et al. 2005).
  • There is level 5 evidence that half of those with a perceived need for physical rehabilitation received it; significant predicting factors of access to health services include health plan type, health condition, health status, severity of condition, income level and age (Beatty et al. 2003).
  • There is level 5 evidence that an annual Comprehensive Preventive Health Evaluation conducted at the SCI centre is related to improved health care utilization and having health, psychosocial, and equipment needs met (Collins 2005).
  • There is level 5 evidence that 40% physiatrists are willing to provide primary care to those with disabilities;  38% feel prepared by residency training to do so (Francisco et al. 1995).
  • There is level 5 evidence that there is considerable duplication between primary care and physiatry;  there is high satisfaction with primary care and physiatry; (Donnelly et al. 2007).
  • There is level 5 evidence that there are significant differences in service utilization between Canadians, Americans, and Britons, but no difference in access to and satisfaction with the services (Donnelly et al. 2007).
  • There is level 5 evidence that barriers to specialized multi-disciplinary outreach service are limited local expert knowledge, lack of funding, service fragmentation (Cox 2001)
  • There is level 5 evidence that half of SCI out-patients consider physiatry as primary care; 90% have little difficulty receiving medical care in the community (Bockeneck 1997).
  • There is level 5 evidence that 75% of people with SCI have multiple clinical problems; patients made an average of 4 GP visits and received average 4.5 home visits (Glickman et al. 1996)
  • A large majority of people with spinal cord injuries have a family doctor and are satisfied with care received.
  • People with spinal cord injuries tend to be high users of primary care.
  • Lack of SCI-specific expertise appears to be the greatest impediment to access to primary care.  Physical barriers are also encountered in some practices.
  • Unmet health needs are a significant problem for people with SCI in primary care, with information needs in particular being poorly met.
  • There is no concensus about the role of physiatry in primary care.  While many people with SCI are content to receive their primary care from a physiatrist, there is some question as to whether physiatrists are the appropriate primary care provider.
  • Coordination is needed to ensure continuity and coverage when multiple providers are involved.

Outreach Programs

A number of models have been proposed in the literature for enhancing access and quality of primary care for people with disabilities.  This review found evidence only regarding outreach models, where expert providers, usually from an institutional rehabilitation setting, reach out to supplement the resources of community primary care settings.  Table 2 presents information on four such multidisciplinary outreach programs.

Table 2: Outreach programs

Discussion

The highest quality evidence found in this review showed no effect of an outreach program for maintaining health after discharge from rehabilitation (Bloemen-Vrencken et al. 2007).  Bloemen-Vrencken and associates (2007) saw no difference in complications, readmissions, or quality of primary care when a nurse provided liaison from rehabilitation to community primary care. 

Another approach to outreach involved a nurse-led clinic aimed at enhancing bowel and bladder care.  Participants reported more up-to-date and practical information was obtained from nurses than from their usual primary care providers (Williams 2005). 

Beck and Scroggins (2001) also describe an educational intervention aimed at people with tetraplegia and their caregivers.  They found significant increases in knowledge and skills related to respiratory complications, autonomic dysreflexia, spasticity, reportable symptoms, effects of aging and availability of community resources.

Other strategies for improving primary care to people with spinal cord injuries include the use of home visits.  Prabhaka and Thakker (2003) showed a decrease in readmissions, and an increase in functional status and quality of care using a home visiting program. 

Conclusions

  • There is level 2 evidence that an outreach program (Transmural care - nurse liaison from rehab to primary care) does not appear to be effective in reducing pressure sores, urinary tract infections or hospital re-admission rates  (Bloemen-Vrencken et al. 2007)
  • There is level 4 evidence that outreach in the form of home visits from a multidisciplinary team from the rehab centre led to fewer re-admissions and improved rehab outcomes (Prabhaka et al. 2003). 
  • There is level 4 evidence that a multidisciplinary Health Maintenance Education outreach program improves patient satisfaction with primary care and increases knowledge of respiratory complications, autonomic hyperreflexia, spasticity, aging and community resources (Beck and Scroggins 2001).
  • There is level 4 evidence that a specialised nurse-led community clinic provided up-to-date and readily applicable knowledge about bowel and bladder issues and skin breakdown, and was preferred over a medical clinic (Williams 2005).
  • There is conflicting evidence about the effectiveness of outreach programs for maintaining health in the community with SCI.

Health issues of key importance in primary care for SCI

The final section of this review presents articles discussing the most common health concerns experienced by people with SCI in the community, and those issues most typically seen in primary care.  This section is made up of 13 surveys of patients and providers, aiming to increase awareness of the nature and scope of health concerns typically experienced by people living in the community with spinal cord injuries.  Table 3 summarizes the health issues and information needs of individuals with SCI when they seek primary care.

Table 3: Health issues of key importance

Discussion

There is consensus in the literature about the issues that are of most concern to people with spinal cord injuries when they seek primary care.  Fifty-eight percent (58%) of contacts with the family physician were related to secondary complications (van Loo et al. 2009).  Most consistently mentioned were bowel and bladder problems and pain (Donnelly et al. 2007; Collins 2005; Glickman 1996; Warms 1987; Williams 2005).  Eighty percent (80%) of SCI patients in primary care bring multiple problems to their family physician (Glickman 1996), and according to Warms (1987), 80% of the issues raised in the typical family medicine encounter are disability-related.

Both Collins (2005) and Beatty (2003) refer to the need for adaptive equipment and prescription medications as concerns in primary care.  Collins (2005) notes that these are key reasons why individuals seek an annual check-up.  Beatty (2003) notes that 94% of patients with SCI have needs for prescription medications, and 69% for adaptive equipment.  In both instances, the primary care physician is the coordinator for these needs.  They also found that 93% of prescription medication needs and 69% of equipment needs were met.

Ashe and associates (2009) provide support for the importance of bone density, and the need for pharmacological treatment if indicated.  Two articles highlighted the need for attention to skin care and spasticity.  Glickman and associates (1996) claim that 42% of patients have dermatological issues and 65% need help with the management of spasticity.  van Loo’s sample in the Netherlands (2009) demonstrated that 34% of all secondary complications were preventable, especially skin complications, which were judged to be 53% preventable.

Unfortunately, there are a number of issues where unmet needs have been observed in primary care.  Donnelly and colleagues (2007) noted that there are issues that appear not be well covered by primary care, whether it came from a family physician or physiatrist – specifically issues of psychological health, sexual and reproductive health, lifestyle and community functioning.  McDermott and colleagues (2005) noted that depression is significantly higher among people with disabilities, and that it has a significantly earlier onset when the disability is of a traumatic origin.  Warms (1987) also found unmet needs for health promotion and lifestyle issues.

One frequently overlooked area of primary care for people with spinal cord injuries is the area of sexual and reproductive health.  Oshima and colleagues (1998) note that physicians are typically not prepared for the special issues associated with the gynaecological or obstetric needs of women with spinal cord injuries, or of the procedures necessary to provide them with a reasonable standard of primary care. 

Finally, several studies referred to the information needs of people with spinal cord injuries in primary care.  Vaidyanathan and colleagues (2001) found unequivocally that patients wanted clear information about their health, preferably in written form.  They wanted information shared among health providers as well as with themselves.   Gontkovsky and colleagues (2007) also identified information needs in a spinal cord injured population, especially information about aging, current research and other educational offerings.  Ethnic minorities in particular had a difficult time having their information needs met. 

Conclusions

  • There is level 3 evidence that depression rates are higher and onset is earlier among individuals with disabilities, especially traumatic-onset disabilities, such as SCI, compared to controls (McDermott et al. 2005).
  • There is level 5 evidence that 52% of contact with GP’s was regarding secondary complications; 34% of secondary complications are believed to be preventable; 72% report an unmet need for health care, particularly rehabilitation services (van Loo et al. 2009)
  • There is level 5 evidence that physiatrists consider bone health after SCI is an important issue, and favour treatment pharmacologically over rehabilitation (Ashe et al. 2009).
  • There is level 5 evidence that individuals with chronic SCI would like more information regarding aging with SCI, SCI research, and SCI educational information;  ethnic minorities had the greatest unmet needs for information (Gontkovsky et al. 2007).
  • There is level 5 evidence that 90% of individuals with SCI would like to receive written information about their condition following a medical checkup (Vaidyanathan et al. 2001).
  • There is level 5 evidence that 80% of issues raised by patients with SCI in primary care are disability-related; health promotion and counseling needs typically unmet (Warms 1987).
  • There is level 5 evidence that needs for lifestyle and emotional issues often go unmet (Donnelly et al. 2007).
  • There is level 5 evidence that the majority medical residents are not comfortable treating a women with tetraplegia who has recently become pregnant. (Oshima et al. 1998)
  • There is a high level of consistency in identifying the most common issues raised by people with spinal cord injuries in primary care.
  • The majority of the issues raised in primary care are disability-related — specifically, they are secondary complications of the spinal cord injury.
  • The most commonly raised issues are bowel, bladder and pain.  Also of significant concern are skin care, equipment and medication needs, depression and bone density.
  • Unmet needs in primary care pertain primarily to psychological issues, sexual and reproductive health, health promotion and lifestyle, and information needs.

General Discussion and Implications

This scoping review set out to discover the current state of knowledge in the research literature about primary care for people with spinal cord injuries.  Only 20 articles were found published in the last 29 years that met the inclusion criteria for this review.  Of these, only 1 resulted in Level 2 evidence; that is, generalizable findings based on quasi-experimental research (Bloemen-Vrencken et al. 2007; a prospective randomized controlled trial).  One offered Level 3 evidence (McDermott et al 2005; a case control study), 5 offered Level 4 evidence (post-tests, pre-post tests, and case series)), and 13 surveys provided Level 5 evidence. 

Despite the paucity of research, it is encouraging to note most people with spinal cord injuries report that they do have primary care coverage, either from their family physician or from a spinal cord injury specialist, and most are satisfied with the care they receive (Bockeneck 1997; Collins et al. 2005; Donnelly et al. 2007).  There appears to be some agreement that an annual follow-up visit, whether with the family physician or the rehabilitation specialist, is compatible with having one’s concerns addressed and having a plan for health maintenance and prevention of secondary complications.  However, significant unmet needs persist – needs for specialized expertise regarding spinal cord injury, needs for information, and needs for health promotion, lifestyle and prevention services (Beatty et al. 2003; Donnelly et al. 2007; Gontovsky et al. 2007; Munce et al. 2009; van Loo et al. 2009).  These unmet needs are most likely a product of the complexity of lifelong spinal cord injury, and the ongoing need for creative, vigilant, responsive primary care. 

Patients with spinal cord injuries are undoubtedly among the small percentage in any typical caseload who have multiple, complex health needs.  According to Wallace and Seidman (2006) and Rosen (2006), 5-6% of the patients in a standard family practice consume about 1/3 of the practice’s resources.  These patients require the services of a multi-disciplinary team to adequately manage their array of health and social concerns.  Interestingly, this statistic of 5-6% coincides precisely with the prevalence of severe disabilities in the Canadian population (Statistics Canada 2006).  We suggest it is no coincidence that those with severe disabilities, such as spinal cord injury, are high users of primary care, and bring with them multiple needs and expectations (McColl and Shortt 2001).  Despite the best of intentions, these needs may not all be met in the standard 10-20 minute family physician interaction, where there are often restrictions on the number of issues that may be raised.  For patients who routinely attend with 5 or 6 issues, of which only 3 can be raised, it is little wonder that unmet needs persist, regardless of the quality of care that is delivered in that standard brief interaction.

The answer to this dilemma is not to simply ask more of family physicians, but rather to suggest alternative models of primary care for these subsets of the population with extraordinary needs.  Bloemen-Vrencken et al. (2005) and McColl et al. (2009) provide review articles on models of community care for people with spinal cord injuries.  Bloemen-Vrencken and colleagues (2005) found that  models such as tele-consultation, out-patient clinics, case management and home visiting could not be definitively evaluated based on the available research, however several studies produced positive results in terms of secondary complications, service utilization and well-being.  McColl and colleagues (2009) found that the clinic model is the most common approach in primary care to community follow-up of patients with severe disabilities; however, other promising models, such as shared care, case management and community-based rehabilitation, should be considered.  Booth and Kendall (2007) provided qualitative evidence that specialized multidisciplinary outreach increased coordination with local care providers and enhanced resources needed for successful transition to the community. 

The broader health literature is unequivocal that a robust system of primary care is the best assurance available of good health outcomes for the population, and reasonable health service utilization.  Historically, a subset of the population with spinal cord injuries has used specialists (particularly physiatrists) to provide their primary care.  While this approach ensures a high degree of expertise in spinal cord injury, there are a number of arguments against it.  Not least among these is the clear preference by physiatrists to resist responsibility for primary care (Francisco et al. 1995).  The primary care system is best positioned to provide comprehensive, multidisciplinary, holistic care for all, including people with spinal cord injuries. 

Summary

  • There is level 5 evidence that half of those with a perceived need for physical rehabilitation received it; significant predicting factors of access to health services include health plan type, health condition, health status, severity of condition, income level and age (Beatty et al., 2003).
  • There is level 5 evidence that an annual Comprehensive Preventive Health Evaluation conducted at the SCI centre is related to improved health care utilization and having health, psychosocial, and equipment needs met (Collins 2005).
  • There is level 5 evidence that 40% physiatrists are willing to provide primary care to those with disabilities;  38% feel prepared by residency training to do so (Francisco et al., 1995).
  • There is level 5 evidence that there is considerable duplication between primary care and physiatry;  there is high satisfaction with primary care and physiatry; (Donnelly et al., 2007).
  • There is level 5 evidence that there are significant differences in service utilization between Canadians, Americans, and Britons, but no difference in access to and satisfaction with the services (Donnelly et al., 2007).
  • There is level 4 evidence that GP utilization is related to older age, complications and chronic care living (Munce et al., 2009)
  • There is level 4 evidence that individuals living in more rural areas are twice as likely to visit the Emergency Department than those living in cities (Munce et al 2009).
  • There is level 5 evidence that barriers to specialized multi-disciplinary outreach service are limited local expert knowledge, lack of funding, service fragmentation (Cox, 2001)
  • There is level 5 evidence that half of SCI out-patients consider physiatry as primary care; 90% have little difficulty receiving medical care in the community (Bockeneck, 1997).
  • There is level 5 evidence that 75% of people with SCI have multiple clinical problems; patients made an average of 4 GP visits and received average 4.5 home visits (Glickman et al., 1996)
  • There is level 2 evidence that an outreach program (Transmural care - nurse liaison from rehab to primary care) does not appear to be effective in reducing pressure sores, urinary tract infections or hospital re-admission rates  (Bloemen-Vrencken et al. 2007)
  • There is level 4 evidence that clinician adherence to bowel and bladder guidelines improves with targeted implementation plan (Goetz et al 2005).
  • There is level 4 evidence that outreach in the form of home visits from a multidisciplinary team  from the rehab centre led to fewer re-admissions and improved rehab outcomes (Prabhaka et al. 2003). 
  • There is level 4 evidence that a multidisciplinary Health Maintenance Education outreach program improves patient satisfaction with primary care and increases knowledge of respiratory complications, autonomic hyperreflexia, spasticity, aging and community resources (Beck & Scroggins, 2001).
  • There is level 4 evidence that a specialised nurse-led community clinic provided up-to-date and readily applicable knowledge about bowel and bladder issues and skin breakdown, and was preferred over a medical clinic (Williams 2005).
  • There is level 3 evidence that depression rates are higher and onset is earlier among individuals with disabilities, especially traumatic-onset disabilities, such as SCI, compared to controls (McDermott et al, 2005).
  • There is level 5 evidence that 52% of contact with GP’s was regarding secondary complications; 34% of secondary complications are believed to be preventable; 72% report an unmet need for health care, particularly rehabilitation services (van Loo et al., 2009)
  • There is level 5 evidence that physiatrists consider bone health after SCI is an important issue, and favour treatment pharmacologically over rehabilitation (Ashe et al, 2009).
  • There is level 5 evidence that individuals with chronic SCI would like more information regarding aging with SCI, SCI research, and SCI educational information;  ethnic minorities had the greatest unmet needs for information (Gontkovsky et al, 2007).
  • There is level 5 evidence that 90% of individuals with SCI would like to receive written information about their condition following a medical checkup (Vaidyanathan et al, 2001).
  • There is level 5 evidence that 80% of issues raised by patients with SCI in primary care are disability-related; health promotion and counseling needs typically unmet (Warms, 1987).
  • There is level 5 evidence that needs for lifestyle and emotional issues often go unmet (Donnelly et al 2007).
  • There is level 5 evidence that the majority medical residents are not comfortable treating a women with tetraplegia who has recently become pregnant. (Oshima et al 1998)

Key Points

  • A large majority of people with spinal cord injuries have a family doctor and are satisfied with care received.
  • People with spinal cord injuries tend to be high users of primary care.
  • Lack of SCI-specific expertise appears to be the greatest impediment to accessing primary care.  Physical barriers are also encountered in some practices.
  • Unmet health needs are a significant problem for people with SCI in primary care, with information needs in particular being poorly met. 
  • There is no concensus about the role of physiatry in primary care.  While many people with SCI are content to receive their primary care from a physiatrist, there is some question as to whether physiatrists are the appropriate primary care provider. 
  • Coordination is needed to ensure continuity and coverage when multiple providers are involved.
  • There is conflicting evidence about the effectiveness of outreach programs for maintaining health in the community with SCI.
  • There is a high level of consistency in identifying the most common issues raised by people with spinal cord injuries in primary care.  
  • The majority of the issues raised in primary care are disability-related – specifically, they are secondary complications of the spinal cord injury. 
  • The most commonly raised issues are bowel, bladder and pain.  Also of significant concern are skin care, equipment and medication needs, depression and bone density.
  • Unmet needs in primary care pertain primarily to psychological issues, sexual and reproductive health, health promotion and lifestyle, and information needs.

References

  • Ashe MC, Eng JJ, Krassioukov A. Physiatrists' opinions and practice patterns for bone health after SCI. Spinal Cord 2009 March;47(3):242-248.
  • Batavia AI. Of wheelchairs and managed care. Health Aff. 1999 Nov-Dec;18(6):177-182.
  • Beatty PW, Hagglund KJ, Neri MT, Dhont KR, Clark MJ, Hilton SA. Access to health care services among people with chronic or disabling conditions: patterns and predictors. Arch.Phys.Med.Rehabil. 2003 10;84(10):1417-1425.
  • Beck LA, Scroggins LM. Optimizing health of individuals with tetraplegia. SCI Nursing 2001 Winter;18(4):181-186.
  • Bernardez SJ, Brown LT, Nora JT, Stevermer D. Primary care for the spinal cord injured patient. J Am Acad Physician Assist 1994 1994;7(7):526-531.
  • Bloemen-Vrencken J, de Witte L, Post MW. Follow-up care for persons with spinal cord injury living in the community: a systematic review of interventions and their evaluation. Spinal Cord 2005 08;43(8):462-475.
  • Bloemen-Vrencken J, de Witte L, Post M, Pons C, van Asbeck F, LHV, et al. Comparison of two Dutch follow-up care models for spinal cord-injured patients and their impact on health problems, re-admissions and quality of care. Clin.Rehabil. 2007 11;21(11):997-1006.
  • Bluestein, D., Starling, E., Moore, P., Droesch, J., Davis, D., Wade, W (1988).  Caring for a paraplegic patient and her family. J.Fam.Pract. 1988 370-1; Oct;27(4):365-367.
  • Bockenek WL. Primary care for persons with disabilities: a fragmented model of care for persons with spinal cord injuries... The Primary Care Summit... April 6, 1995, at the Rehabilitation Institute of Michigan. Am.J.Phys.Med.Rehabil. 1997 1997;76(3):S43-6.
  • Booth S, Kendall M.  Benefits and challenges of providing transitional rehabilitation services to people with spinal cord injury from regional, rural and remote locations.  Aust. J. Rural Health 2007 Jun; 15(3): 172-178. 
  • Brooker C, Cousins MJ, Molloy AR. Neuropathic pain: A GP's guide. Modern Medicine of Australia 1999;42(5):58-68.
  • Collins EG, Langbein WE, Smith B, Hendricks R, Hammond M, Weaver F. Patients' perspective on the comprehensive preventive health evaluation in veterans with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2005 Jun;43(6):366-374.
  • Cox RJ, Amsters DI, Pershouse KJ.  The need for a multidisciplinary outreach service for people with spinal cord injury living in the community.  Clin. Rehabil. 2001 Dec; 15(6):  600-606.
  • Donnelly C, McColl MA, Charlifue S, Glass C, O'Brien P, Savic G, et al. Utilization, access and satisfaction with primary care among people with spinal cord injuries: a comparison of three countries. Spinal Cord 2007;45(1):25-36.
  • Francisco GE, Chae JC, DeLisa JA. Physiatry as a primary care specialty. Am.J.Phys.Med.Rehabil. 1995;74(3):186-192.
  • Glickman S, Dalrymple-Hay M, Phillips GF. Spinal cord injury after rehabilitation: the general practice experience. Br J Ther Rehabil 1996 03;3(3):168-171.
  • Goetz LL, Nelson AL, Guilhan M, Bosshart HT, Harrow JJ, Gerhart KD, et al.  Provider adherence to implementation of clinical practice guidelines for neurogenic bowel in adults with spinal cord injury.  J. Spinal Cord Med. 2005; 28(5): 394-406.
  • Gontkovsky ST, Russum P, Stokic DS. Perceived information needs of community-dwelling persons with chronic spinal cord injury: findings of a survey and impact of race. Disabil.Rehabil. 2007 08/30;29(16):1305-1312.
  • Groah SL, Stiens SA, Gittler MS, Kirshblum SC, McKinely WO. Spinal cord injury medicine. 5. Preserving wellness and independence of the aging patient with spinal cord injury: a primary care approach for the rehabilitation medicine specialist. Arch.Phys.Med.Rehabil. 2002 03/02;83(3):S82.
  • Holcomb,L.O. (2008).  Community reintegration and chronic spinal cord injury. SCI Nurs.  2000; 17(2):52-58.
  • Kroll T, Beatty PW, Bingham S. Primary care satisfaction among adults with physical disabilities: the role of patient-provider communication. Manag.Care Q. 2003;11(1):11-19.
  • Kroll T, Neri MT. Use of primary prevention services among male adults with cerebral palsy, multiple sclerosis, or spinal cord injury in managed care and fee-for-service. Manage Care Q 2004;12(3):6-10.
  • McColl, M. A., Forster, D., Shortt, S. E. D., Hunter, D. J. W., Dorland, J., Benecki, L. et al. . Physician experiences providing primary care to people with disabilities. Healthcare Policy 2008;4(1): 129-147.
  • McColl, M.A., Shortt, S., Godwin, M., Smith, K., Rowe, K., O’Brien, P., & Donnelly, C. .  Models for integrating rehabilitation and primary care:  a scoping study.  Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2009; 90 (9): 1523-1531.
  • McDermott S, Moran R, Platt T, Issac T, Wood H, Dasari S. Depression in adults with disabilities, in primary care. Disability & Rehabilitation 2005 Feb 4;27(3):117-123.
  • Middleton JW, Leong G, Mann L. Management of spinal cord injury in general practice - part 1. Aust.Fam.Physician 2008 04;37(4):229-233.
  • Middleton JW, Leong G, Mann L. Management of spinal cord injury in general practice - part 2. Aust.Fam.Physician 2008 05;37(4):331-338.
  • Munce SE, Guilcher SJ, Couris CM, Fung K, Craven BC, Verrier M, et al. Physician utilization among adults with traumatic spinal cord injury in Ontario: a population-based study. Spinal Cord 2009 Jun;47(6):470-476.
  • Oshima S, Kirschner KL, Heinemann A, Semik P. Assessing the knowledge of future internists and gynecologists in caring for a woman with tetraplegia. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 1998 10;79(10):1270-1276.
  • Potter,  P.J., Wolfe , D.L., Burkell,  J.A., Hayes, K.C. (2004).  Challenges in educating individuals with SCI to reduce secondary conditions. Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation, Jun;10(1):30-40.
  • Prabhaka MM, Thakker TH.  A follow-up program in India for patients with spinal cord-injury:  paraplegia safari.  J. Spinal Cord Med. 2004; 27(3): 260-262.
  • Statistics Canada (2010). 2006 Participation and activity limitations survey: Disability in Canada. Ottawa: Government of Canada.
  • Stanley,  W.G. (1981).  Follow-up care of the spinal cord injury patient. Am.Fam.Physician, Jul;24(1):105-111.
  • Starfield, B. (1997). The future of primary care in a managed care era. International Journal of Health Services, 27, 687-696.
  • Tepperman PS. Primary care after spinal cord injury. What every physician should know. Postgrad.Med. 1989 Oct;86(5):211-218.
  • Tolbert G. Staying connected: clinicians must provide lifelong care to people with SCI. Adv Dir Rehabil 2002 12;11(12):23.
  • van Loo, MA, Post MWM, Bloemen, JHA, van Asbeck, FWA (2009).  Care needs of persons with long-term spinal cord injury living at home in the Netherlands.  Spinal Cord (online publication 3 November 2009).
  • Vaidyanathan S, Glass CA, Soni BM, Bingley J, Singh G, Watt J, et al. Doctor-patient communication: do people with spinal cord injury wish to receive written information about their medical condition from the physicians after an outpatient visit or after a readmission in the spinal unit? Spinal Cord 2001 12;39(12):650-653.
  • Warms CA. Health promotion services in post-rehabilitation spinal cord injury health care. Rehabil.Nurs. 1987 1987;12(6):304-308.
  • Williams S. Improving the continuing care for individuals with spinal cord injuries.  British Journal of Nursing 2005 Feb 10-23; 14(3): 161–165.

Rehabilitation Practices

Introduction

The SCI rehabilitation practices of today were influenced greatly by the pioneering efforts of Sir Ludwig Guttman who was instrumental in the creation of specialized spinal units to care for injured soldiers returning to England during and after WWII (Guttmann 1967). Eventual adoption of this more specialized and integrated approach followed in many additional jurisdictions (Bors 1967; Bedbrook 1979), bolstered by reports of reduced mortality and enhanced long-term survival which was attributed in part to more effective management of secondary conditions associated with SCI (e.g., UTI’s, pressure sores, respiratory conditions) (Richardson & Meyer Jr. 1981; Le & Price 1982; Geisler et al.1983).

At present, the “ideal” scenario for modern SCI care is purported to be treatment in specialized, integrated centres with an interdisciplinary team of health care professionals providing care as early as possible following injury and throughout the rehabilitation process with appropriate discharge to the community characterized by ongoing outpatient care and follow-up (Donovan et al. 1984; Tator et al. 1995). This is best facilitated under one roof or within an organized “system” which is distinguished by seamless transitions as patients proceed from acute care through rehabilitation to outpatient care. While it is generally accepted that this “ideal” more specialized, integrated approach should result in better outcomes, there is very little robust evidence that supports this directly. This is understandable, given the relatively low incidence of SCI, limitations in designing trials with adequate controls and the inherent difficulty in ascribing potential outcomes to such a multi-faceted process as rehabilitation. For these reasons, we have adopted an alternative approach within the present chapter with respect to the reviewed articles as compared to most other chapters in SCIRE. Many of the articles presented in the current chapter do not investigate a specific intervention although they do describe rehabilitation outcomes and the various factors that are associated with producing optimal outcomes. Accordingly, when no specific intervention is assessed experimentally, a PEDro or Downs and Black (Downs & Black 1998) score is not provided. These articles were separated into five categories: Description of Rehabilitation Outcomes, Factors for Optimal Outcomes, Specialized vs. General SCI Units, Early vs. Delayed Admission to Specialized Units and Health Care After SCI Inpatient Rehabilitation.

In addition, in some studies the distinction between acute vs. rehabilitative care is somewhat blurred as studies may have been conducted in centers or systems where these services are more integrated. The present chapter is focused on issues associated with rehabilitation care and we have attempted to clearly identify when acute care practice may have been merged within the reporting of rehabilitation research results.

Wolfe DL, Hsieh JTC, Mehta S (2010). Rehabilitation Practices and Associated Outcomes Following Spinal Cord Injury. In Eng JJ, Teasell RW, Miller WC, Wolfe DL, Townson AF, Hsieh JTC, Connolly SJ, Mehta S, Sakakibara BM, editors. Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Evidence. Version 3.0

Common Abbreviations Used In SCI Rehabilitation

AIS – ASIA Impairment Scale

ASIA – American Spinal Injury Association (and associated International Guidelines for Neurological Classification)

BI – Barthel Index

FIM – Functional Independence Measure

LOS – Length of Stay

MBI – Modified Barthel Index

OT – Occupational Therapy

SLT – Speech & Language Therapy

PT – Physical Therapy (Physiotherapy)

UTI – Urinary Tract Infection

What is SCI Rehabilitation

There is little consensus among rehabilitation specialists for what constitutes the essential elements of SCI rehabilitation. As with most forms of rehabilitation, rehabilitation programming directed towards persons with SCI has been likened to a “black box”, with research endeavours focused on the entire “rehabilitation package“ but little emphasis on investigating the effectiveness of specific therapeutic practices (Whiteneck et al. 2009).

Although an internationally accepted definition of SCI rehabilitation and its essential elements remains to be determined, we have provided an operational definition that distinguishes between specialized and general programs of SCI rehabilitation on which this Chapter is based. This definition was informed by a preliminary review of service offerings among the 16 SCI US Model System rehabilitation programs (http://www.spinalcord.uab.edu/show.asp?durki=104757&site=1226&return=21392) and of Canadian SCI rehabilitation programs (SCISN Rehabilitation Escan; SCI Definitions Framework:  http://www.gtarehabnetwork.ca/downloads/self-assessment-tool-sci-inpatient.pdf). In addition, other resources were reviewed including the WHO definition of rehabilitation (World Health Organization, 1981), the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (World Health Organization 2001) and efforts of clinicians and researchers to characterize the specialized treatment outcomes and methods involved in general (Stucki et al. 2007) and SCI-specific rehabilitation (Harvey et al. 2009; DeVivo 2007; Blackwell et al. 2001). Given these resources, a definition of specialized SCI rehabilitation could be described as follows:

A specialized SCI rehabilitation program provides comprehensive, and patient-focused rehabilitation services, for inpatient, transitional living, outpatient and follow-up care, to empower people with SCI and their families to achieve optimal quality of life continuing into the community (focusing on increasing self-reliance and gaining independence).  Through organized regional referrals, care is delivered through a multidisciplinary team provided by board certified physician specialists and accredited allied health professionals (i.e. physical/occupational/speech/ recreational therapists, nurse specialists, psychologists, dieticians, engineers, social workers, etc.). As a rehabilitation program specialized in the care of people with SCI (experienced through trauma or disease), active participation in research is facilitated through university affiliated teaching institutions.

Areas of further expertise may include specialized clinics (i.e. seating, audiology, pain, wound, sexuality/reproduction), respiratory/paediatric services, community/peer-support/fitness-wellness/health-maintenance/injury-prevention/day/combined (i.e. brain injuries, strokes, amputations, orthopedic conditions, neuromuscular diseases, burns and related disabilities) programs, support groups, vocational counseling, innovation/research updates, education, etc.  Such specialized programs will be nationally (and possibly internationally) recognized and may be accredited through independent accreditation bodies (e.g., CARF/Commission on Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities; JCAHO/Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations; AC/Accreditation Canada).

Up to date, general rehabilitation programs would likely follow the ICF-based conceptualization of rehabilitation that “aims to enable people with health conditions experiencing or likely to experience disability to achieve and maintain optimal functioning in interaction with the environment” (Stucki et al 2007).  In contrast to a specialized SCI rehabilitation program, the general rehabilitation program is designed for individuals who have a medically stable disability, without additional active medical problems that could affect participation in therapies, with identifiable rehabilitation goals and a high potential to achieve those goals towards upgrading or maintenance of independence in the home and community.  General medical oversight, nursing, and physical/occupational/speech therapies are commonly provided to facilitate a return to work or to functional independence for activities of daily living. A general program of rehabilitation may not be able to provide acute medical services and diagnostics, especially for complex medical conditions that involve multiple body systems such as spinal cord injury with or without impaired cognition.  Special considerations could be made for these latter individuals but referral to an appropriate specialized rehabilitation program is the preferred option.  Services are intended for residents of the regions immediately surrounding the rehabilitation facility and are not usually affiliated with a university-based teaching institution.  Some general rehabilitation programs may have further areas of expertise such as wound treatment or pain management, etc.

There are currently efforts underway to “unravel” the “black box” of rehabilitation as applied to persons with SCI (Whiteneck et al. 2009). These investigators are employing a practice-based evidence approach across multiple centres to identify and investigate the myriad of practices that are conducted across the rehabilitation enterprise. They intend to link this information with appropriate and systematic outcome measurement so as to evaluate the effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions (or combinations thereof). A critical step that was required before embarking on this ambitious endeavour was to develop a taxonomy of rehabilitation interventions associated with every discipline contributing to SCI rehabilitation (Gassaway et al. 2009). The taxonomies provide a systematic means to enable clinicians to document the specific interactions and interventions they conduct with their patients and this has been completed for seven disciplines including physical and occupational therapy, psychology, speech language pathology, therapeutic recreation, social work and nursing (e.g., Natale et al. 2009; Ozelie et al. 2009; Wilson et al. 2009; Gordon et al. 2009; Cahow et al. 2009; Abeytal et al. 2009; Johnson et al. 2009).

Description of SCI Rehabilitation Outcomes

Much research has been directed at describing outcomes following SCI rehabilitation and examining various factors that might be associated with good (or poor) outcomes. Ethical and practical considerations limit the application of randomized controlled designs or other experimental designs in investigating methods for enhancing patient outcomes. Typically, investigators employ case series, case control or pre-post trial designs and often utilize correlational or predictive analyses (e.g., univariate or multivariate regression) of large single or multi-centre patient databases to determine specific associations or factors that are associated with optimal rehabilitation outcomes. Often these studies are quite large in scope as investigators explore relationships among a variety of socio-demographic and injury-related variables as they endeavour to determine optimal rehabilitation practice. Given the inherent breadth of findings present in individual studies in this area in which large databases are mined for relationships among large arrays of variables, it is difficult to follow the same pattern of brevity and topic focus found in most chapters of the present review. In the present section we have taken a slightly different approach. First, a comprehensive table can be found in Section 9.0 Appendix 1 that lists specific studies in more detail and which outlines various findings directed at describing outcomes associated with comprehensive inpatient SCI rehabilitation. This is intended as an overall resource for those interested in the specific findings relating to outcomes associated with rehabilitation practice. In the text are more focused tables summarizing specific data culled from the more comprehensive table (contained in the appendix), thereby permitting an assessment of similar types of rehabilitation outcomes. The subsequent section then describes more focused investigations that examine the effect of the various factors in producing optimal outcomes. These include studies that assess the effect of the intensity of rehabilitation, age, gender and race on rehabilitation outcomes.

 

There are many types of outcomes that have been associated with SCI rehabilitation. In the present review, we will focus on the most commonly employed measures and have outlined these along with a few typical examples in Table 1. In particular, these include measures that examine the effectiveness of health delivery as well as measures that assess functional, neurological and general health status of patients. Each of these measurement types comprise the topic areas of separate summary tables assembled from the more comprehensive table in Appendix 1. It should be noted that other measures of obvious importance to SCI rehabilitation care providers and people with SCI such as measures of health-related quality of life and those that assess different facets of community integration (e.g., employment status, Reintegration to Normal Living Index) have not been included in the present chapter as they are considered in the chapter entitled “Community Reintegration Issues Post Spinal Cord Injury”. In addition, studies examining health status have not been fully addressed in the present chapter as these typically report the incidence of specific secondary conditions (most notably, pressure sores and UTIs) and these will be described more fully in the specific chapters devoted to these issues.

Table 1 Outcome Measure Types and Examples Relevant to SCI Rehabilitation

Outcome Measure Type

Specific Outcome Measures

Health Delivery Indicators

LOS, Hospital Charges, Discharge Destination

Functional Status

FIM, MBI

Neurological Status

AIS, ASIA motor scores, Frankel Index

Health Status

Incidence of secondary complications

It should also be noted that specific outcome measures can combine 2 of these outcomes such as in measures of efficiency. Most commonly, change scores for functional (e.g., FIM) or neurological (e.g., ASIA motor scores) measures are divided by LOS to get an average change for that particular measure, thereby providing an indication of the efficiency of the rehabilitation process in effecting change. Measures of this nature will be profiled in the sub-section for which the numerator is related. For example, ASIA motor score efficiency would be addressed under findings associated with neurological status.

Rehabilitation Length of Stay

Several authors have made comparisons of rehabilitation length of stay (LOS) between countries or across other jurisdictions (Burke et al. 1985; Muslumanoglu et al. 1997; Pagliacci et al. 2003; Chan & Chan 2005). Additionally, others have noted the trend for progressively shorter LOS over the past several decades, especially in the US (DeVivo 2007; DeVivo et al. 1991; Morrison 1999; Eastwood et al. 1999) although there is also data from Israel that shows this as well (Ronen et al. 2004). Stover noted that reductions in the 1970s and early 1980s were likely due to increased efficiency of rehabilitation teams (Stover 1995). More recent reductions in the US have been attributed to restrictions imposed by payers (Morrison 1999). Table 2 summarizes various reports in the literature for LOS organized by jurisdiction and also by the time period for which the data was collected. Data were only included in this table if the underlying sample was deemed representative of an overall heterogeneous population of individuals with SCI (i.e., unselected sample of a single or multi-centre study). Some data was included and grouped for evaluating specific issues and this has been appropriately indicated. In addition, data from studies for which it was not clear that the purpose of admission was for comprehensive inpatient rehabilitation (and may have involved acute care) were not included.

Table 2 Rehabilitation Length of Stay (by Country and Sample Period)

Rehabilitation LOS is also known to vary according to neurological status and data from studies reporting LOS organized by level of injury (i.e., paraplegia vs. tetraplegia) or completeness are shown in Table 3. Again this is organized by jurisdiction (country) and the time period over which the sample was analyzed.

Table 3 Rehabilitation Length of Stay (by Neurological Status)

Discussion

As seen in Tables 2 and 3, rehabilitation LOS varies widely from country to country. While no investigators have systematically analyzed country-by-country variation it is apparent that the US has typically shorter rehabilitation LOS times than other countries reporting data. Most data has originated in the US, bolstered by the development of the US model systems database, with reports from other countries for the most part limited to a handful of descriptions of single-centre experience.

Within the US, it is clear that the trend for progressively shorter rehabilitation LOS has continued to 2009. Across 5 separate reports, the National SCI Statistical Centre (2005, 2009), DeVivo (2007), Morrison (1999) and Eastwood et al. (1999) indicated reduced LOS from the period between 1973 to 2006. Eastwood et al. (1999) examined the large US Model systems database of individuals with traumatic SCI (N=3,904) and reported annual mean LOS values from 1990 to1997. For these years, the highest value was 80.9 days in 1992 and the lowest was 54.3 days in 1996. Mean LOS values for 1990-1992 seemed fairly stable at higher values, with 1994-1997 values lower and 1993 at an intermediate value. DeVivo (2007) has reported on the same dataset over a longer period of time beginning in 1973 (N=24,333), to extend the trend to a LOS of 45 days in 2006.  Morrison (1999) performed a direct comparison of 1991 vs 1995 mean LOS values in the largest SCI rehabilitation in the US in order to assess the effect of shorter rehabilitation LOS on functional outcomes. These authors confirmed an even more striking difference between these 2 years given an average LOS of 95.8 days in 1991 as compared to 54.2 days in 1995 (p<0.001). Other reports have described reductions over earlier periods, most notably multi-centre investigations associated with the US Model Systems databases (De Vivo et al. 1991). These same trends are apparent by looking at the public data available from the US National SCI Statistical Centre (NSCISC 2005, 2009).

It is uncertain if the same patterns have been seen in non-Model System centres or in other countries, although it is clear from a single-centre report from Israel analyzing LOS decade by decade that significantly lower LOS was seen beginning in 1996 as compared to earlier time periods (Ronen et al. 2004). Data from this report and also reports from other countries (Tooth et al. 2003, Burke et al. 1985, Australia; Chan & Chan 2005, China; Pagliacci et al. 2003, Italy; Sumida et al. 2001, Japan; Schonherr et al. 1999, Netherlands) indicated LOS remains significantly longer than reported in US data. LOS data from these reports is displayed over time and across several countries in Figure 1 (Note: US Model Systems data for this figure is that reported in the National SCI Statistical Centre 2005 Annual Report).

A low-cost, low intensity, outpatient rehabilitation program is reported by a Columbian group (Lugo et al 2007; N=42) where in-patient rehabilitation was shortened to an average of 13.5 days and augmented with 18 month, interdisciplinary out-patient rehabilitation follow-up.  This low cost intervention achieved adequate functional goals, although these were achieved over a longer period of time due to the lack of accessibility to continuous and intensive therapy.  This report might inform payer-directed LOS reduction efforts which may be driven by a focus on costs and may not necessarily circumvent any consequences associated with reductions to LOS by an increased attention to outpatient services.

Also apparent from Table 3 is the relationship of longer LOS associated with higher level of injury and greater severity of injury.  Similar patterns were seen in all studies describing rehabilitation LOS for individuals with varying injuries. That is, the greatest mean rehabilitation LOS values were seen for those with complete tetraplegia (especially high level) whereas the shortest mean values occurred for those with incomplete paraplegia (DeVivo et al. 1990; Tooth et al. 2003; Chan & Chan 2005) although this relationship of level and injury severity was only a non-significant trend in the data from Israel (Ronen et al. 2004).

Figure 1 Mean Rehabilitation Length of Stay Reported From Different Countries

Conclusions

  • There is level 3 evidence (with predominately US data) that rehabilitation LOS has become progressively shorter during the period of 1973 to 2006. For other countries, only investigators from Israel have published data in a single report that is consistent with this trend.
  • There is level 3 evidence that those with higher level and more severe injuries have longer rehabilitation LOS.
  • Those with higher level and more severe injuries have longer rehabilitation LOS.
  • Rehabilitation LOS in the US and Israel has become progressively shorter over the last few decades.

Neurological and Functional Status

Several studies have identified patterns of neurological and/or functional improvement over the first few months post-injury. The majority of these studies examine neurological and/or functional status and associated changes between rehabilitation admission and discharge. In addition, the Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine (1999) has published a review of expected neurological and functional outcomes following SCI. This Clinical Practice Guideline refers to the work of Bracken et al. (1993; 1997), Geisler et al. (1991) and Waters et al. (1994a; 1994b) in noting that over half of the expected recovery occurs in the first 2 months following injury and recovery may continue but slows noticeably after 3-6 months. This change in neurological status may represent the natural course of recovery, however, it is uncertain as to the extent that rehabilitation practices play in enhancing this recovery.

The Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine (1999) Clinical Practice Guideline provides a comprehensive consensus review itemizing expected functional achievements for individuals at every level of SCI. Table 4 summarizes various reports in the literature for neurological and/or functional status organized by jurisdiction and also by the time period for which the data was collected. As above, data were only included in this table if the underlying sample was deemed representative of an overall heterogeneous population of individuals with SCI (i.e., unselected sample of a single or multi-centre study).

Table 4 Neurological and/or Functional Status (by Country and Sample Period)

Discussion

The AIS represents an internationally recognized system for the classification of individuals with SCI, and as such, has been employed to characterize overall improvement in the neurological status of people with SCI (ASIA 2002). It is somewhat similar to earlier systems such as the Frankel grading classification system. The AIS is an ordinal 5 grade scale classifying individuals from “A” to “E” with “A” designating those with complete SCI and “E” designating individuals with normal sensory and motor function. Most notably, DeVivo (2007), Pagliacci et al. (2003), Celani et al. (2001), Marino et al. (1999) and DeVivo et al. (1991) employed large multi-centre databases and found that individuals with incomplete injuries (especially AIS B or C) were more likely to improve at least 1 grade over the course of rehabilitation. In particular, DeVivo et al. (1991) reported that 45.2% and 55.9% of those initially admitted as AIS B and C respectively improved at least 1 AIS grade as compared to only 10.3% and 7.3% of individuals initially classified as AIS A or D respectively. Over the period of 1973-2006, DeVivo (2007) reported that there was an 8.8% increase in likelihood that those classified as AIS A at admission would improve to AIS B at discharge.  Other reports have presented similar findings and data culled from a sample of these investigations have been summarized in Figure 2. This Figure illustrates the proportion of persons assessed at each AIS (or Frankel) grade status (i.e., A, B, C or D) at discharge from rehabilitation relative to the proportion of people at each AIS level at rehabilitation admission for each of the studies (Burke et al. 1985; Marino et al. 1999; Sumida et al. 2001; Catz et al. 2002; Pagliacci et al. 2003; DeVivo 2007). This provides an indication of the degree of neurological recovery that occurs over the period of rehabilitation. It should be noted that for each study (i.e., jurisdiction) the admission and discharge time points are variable relative to the time of injury although these all are typically within the first six months following injury. In addition, all datasets consisted of relatively unselected patients with traumatic SCI, other than the report by Sumida et al. (2001) which included patients with SCI of both traumatic and nontraumatic etiology.

As one can see, it is striking how similar these patterns of AIS conversion rates are across health systems (i.e., Australia, Israel, Italy, Japan, USA) with only Catz et al. (2002) (i.e., Israel) providing somewhat disparate results.  Overall, AIS A patients comprise from 40-50% of individuals admitted to SCI rehabilitation centers and a similar, but slightly reduced percentage of those are assessed AIS A at discharge. AIS B and AIS C patients comprise ~5-15% and ~10-30% respectively with moderate reductions in these percentages manifest at discharge. Conversely, those assessed AIS D comprise ~15-25% of those admitted which increases to ~25-35% by discharge.

Figure 2: Discharge AIS (or Frankel) Grades for each Initial Admission AIS Grade

The majority of patients assessed AIS A at admission remain so at discharge, whereas a much greater proportion of individuals assessed AIS B recovered significant motor function during rehabilitation so as to be assessed AIS C or D. The conversion rate is even greater for those assessed initially as AIS C but much less so for those assessed as AIS D.

These conversion rates appear similar across these studies and therefore provide a base for comparison with other findings. For example, Moslavac et al. (2008) reported data for a centre-based study in Croatia at which all national cases of SCI resulting from road traffic accidents received rehabilitative care. In this case, although 49% of people were AIS A at admission and 93% of these remained AIS A at discharge, there was a tendency for greater proportions of persons making conversions to AIS D or E of those assessed with an incomplete injury at admission.

Similarly, many individuals also make significant functional gains during comprehensive inpatient rehabilitation. Most often, functional status has been assessed at admission and discharge from rehabilitation using the FIM (De Vivo et al. 1991; Muslumanoglu et al. 1997; Tooth et al. 2003; Chan & Chan 2005) or MBI (Yarkony et al. 1987). Typically, functional gains are greater with rehabilitation for those with incomplete injuries as compared to complete injuries and for those with paraplegia as compared to those with tetraplegia (De Vivo et al. 1991; Muslumanoglu et al. 1997;Tooth et al. 2003; Chan & Chan 2005). In particular, DeVivo et al. (1991) reported similar average FIM gains for those with incomplete and complete paraplegia and incomplete tetraplegia (i.e., 37, 36 and 34 respectively) but much reduced gains for those with complete tetraplegia (i.e., 15).  For the most part increases seen in the FIM have been attributed to motor FIM changes with little change in cognitive FIM scores at least partly due to an apparent ceiling effect (Chan & Chan 2005).

Conclusions

  • There is level 4 evidence that a significant proportion of people (~50%) initially assessed as AIS B and C will improve by at least 1 AIS grade in the first few months post-injury concomitant with inpatient rehabilitation. Fewer individuals (~10%) initially assessed as AIS A and D will improve by 1 AIS grade.
  • There is level 4 evidence that individuals make significant functional gains during inpatient rehabilitation, more so for those with complete and incomplete paraplegia and incomplete tetraplegia.
  • Most individuals make significant functional gains during inpatient rehabilitation.
  • A significant proportion of people improve 1 AIS (ASIA Impairment Scale) grade in the first few months post-injury, particularly those initially assessed AIS B and C.

Factors for Optimal Outcomes


Effect of Intensity on Rehabilitation Outcomes

Although it is commonly assumed that the therapies delivered during inpatient rehabilitation are effective, there is generally little direct evidence that demonstrates a clear relationship between typical therapeutic practice and enhanced functional outcomes (Heinemann et al. 1995). Moreover, there is no evidence that establishes a recommended intensity or amount of therapy that should be delivered to produce a desired result. In SCI rehabilitation, there exists a paucity of studies that examine this issue.

Table 5 Individual Studies - Intensity of Rehabilitation

Discussion

Heinemann et al. (1995) employed a case series design to examine the effect of increased therapeutic intensity on functional rehabilitation outcomes as indicated by motor, cognitive and total FIM scores as well as FIM efficiencies. These investigators performed a comprehensive chart review of patients with SCI (N=106) and traumatic brain injury (N=140) to determine the number of 15-minute therapy units delivered in the provision of PT, OT, SLT and Psychology services. They then performed multiple regression analyses to determine if the amount of therapy was associated with positive outcomes. For the most part, there was little evidence that increased therapeutic intensity had any effect on improving outcomes for the SCI sub-sample although the paucity of well-controlled studies in this area limits the strength of the conclusions that can be drawn.

Conclusions

  • There is level 4 evidence based on a single case series that increased therapeutic intensity may not be associated with any functional benefit as measured by the FIM.
  • Increased therapeutic intensity may not necessarily lead to functional benefits, but data is scarce.

Effect of Age on Rehabilitation Outcomes

Historically, traumatic SCI has been viewed as a young, male concern although there have been recent shifts in the demographics of SCI such that an increasing proportion of recently injured individuals are older (both male and female). In fact, recent epidemiological evidence from Ontario, Canada found that the highest rates of SCI-related hospital admission following trauma in this jurisdiction was for those over 70 years of age although the frequency of specific etiologies (e.g., falls vs motor vehicle crashes) varied with age (Pickett et al. 2006). In the US the average age at injury has increased steadily over the last 30 years with the US Model Systems National SCI Statistical Center (2006) reporting an average age of injury of 38.0 years for the period from 2000-2006 as compared to 28.7 years for the period from 1973-1979. In addition, many centers in various jurisdictions around the world also provide rehabilitation services to individuals with spinal cord damage as the result of a variety of nontraumatic etiologies and often these people are much older than those injured due to trauma (McKinley et al. 2001; McKinley et al. 2002; Scivoletto et al. 2003; New 2005).  

Given these trends for increasing age in those undergoing rehabilitation it is important to understand the effects of age on rehabilitation outcomes. Several investigators have employed retrospective assessments of single or multi-centre patient databases to examine this issue (Cifu et al. 1999a; Cifu et al. 1999b; Seel et al. 2001; Scivoletto et al. 2003; Kennedy et al. 2003).

Table 6 Individual Studies – The Effect of Age on Rehabilitation Outcomes

Discussion

Similar approaches involving case control study designs have been employed by various investigators to examine the effect of age on rehabilitation outcomes. However, in the present review, studies employing some form of matching across different age groups were assessed as representing a higher level of evidence (i.e., Level 3) (Cifu et al. 1999b; Devivo et al. 1990; Seel et al. 2001; Scivoletto et al. 2003; Yarkony et al. 1988) as compared to those deemed as having an inadequate method of controlling for potential confounds (i.e., Level 4) (Cifu et al. 1999a; Kennedy et al. 2003). Several of these studies have demonstrated differences between age groups for a variety of rehabilitation outcomes although there were also some contradictory findings within these studies, albeit some of this may have been due to variation between the sampling frames and methods employed in each study.

For example, Seel et al. (2001) and Cifu et al. (1999a) reported reduced rehabilitation LOS for those with paraplegia due to trauma whereas no differences were seen in investigations of those with tetraplegia due to trauma (Cifu et al. 1999b) and also with the mixed sample of people with both traumatic and nontraumatic SCI (Scivoletto et al. 2003).

Yarkony et al. (1988) was the first study to look at the independent effect of age on rehabilitation outcomes in SCI. This study found functional outcome was only related to age in patients with complete paraplegia.  Within these individuals, Yarkony et al. (1988) demonstrated a trend between increase in age and increase dependence in seven functional skills including: bathing, upper and lower body dressing, stair climbing, and transfers to chair, toilet and bath.  Yarkony attributed this trend to the fact that there is a “greater residual muscle function” in these individuals. Devivo et al. (1990) later supported this trend by demonstrating an inverse relationship between patient’s age and their level of independence in self-care activities. Anzai et al (2006) reported that older individuals were at increased risk of being discharged to an extended care facility due to pre-existing co-morbidities and lack of social and financial supports.

Conversely, all studies examining functional change showed that younger individuals demonstrated greater functional improvements as indicated by increases with the FIM (i.e., motor FIM scores, change scores, efficiencies) (Cifu et al. 1999a; Cifu et al. 1999b; Seel et al. 2001) or BI (Scivoletto et al. 2003). These similar results were obtained from studies involving those with paraplegia (Cifu et al. 1999a; Seel et al. 2001), tetraplegia (Cifu et al. 1999b) and a mixed sample comprised of those with both traumatic and nontraumatic SCI (Scivoletto et al. 2003). On the other hand, Kennedy et al. (2003) employed the Needs Assessment Checklist (NAC) developed internally at Stoke-Mandeville, UK and demonstrated that there were few systematic age-related differences associated with goal attainment in a mixed traumatic, nontraumatic sample. The NAC is a client-focused outcome measure that assesses the degree to which specific behavioural outcomes particularly relevant to the client are achieved. Tchvaloon et al (2008; N=143) also reported no significant effect on recovery due to age at injury on an Israeli population of people with traumatic SCI.

In addition to functional outcomes, effective rehabilitation has also been associated with increases in neurological status as indicated by AIS or ASIA motor scores. Of the studies reviewed and possessing measures of neurological status, both studies limited to those with paraplegia showed no age effects (Cifu et al. 1999a; Seel et al. 2001;). Conversely, similar studies of those with tetraplegia or a mixed traumatic and nontraumatic SCI sample demonstrated that younger individuals were more likely to make significant neurological gains during inpatient rehabilitation (Cifu et al. 1999b; Scivoletto et al. 2003). 

Conclusions

  • There is level 3 evidence that significantly shorter rehabilitation LOS is associated with younger vs older individuals with paraplegia. The same may not be true for those with tetraplegia or for mixed cohorts involving traumatic and nontraumatic SCI.
  • There is level 3 evidence that age is inversely related to patient’s independence level.
  • There is level 3 evidence that younger as compared to older individuals are more likely to obtain greater functional benefits during rehabilitation.
  • There is level 3 evidence that significant increases in neurological status during rehabilitation are more likely with younger than older individuals with tetraplegia or for mixed cohorts involving traumatic and nontraumatic SCI. The same may not be true for those with paraplegia.
  • Younger individuals with paraplegia are more likely to have shorter rehabilitation LOS than older individuals.
  • Younger individuals are more likely to make greater functional gains during rehabilitation than older individuals.
  • Younger individuals with tetraplegia (or in a mixed traumatic, nontraumatic sample) are more likely to make gains in neurological status during rehabilitation than older individuals.

Differences in Traumatic vs Non-Traumatic SCI Rehabilitation Outcomes

Those individuals sustaining damage to the spinal cord due to nontraumatic causes are often treated in specialized inpatient SCI rehabilitation centres more commonly associated with those with SCI due to traumatic etiologies. Various reports have estimated that one-quarter to one half of all cases seen in specialized SCI rehabilitation centers are associated with nontraumatic etiologies (Muslumanoglu et al. 1997; McKinley et al. 1999b; van der Putten et al. 2001). Despite these significant numbers, relatively little systematic research is directed at nontraumatic SCI (van der Putten et al. 2001; McKinley et al. 2002). Common causes of nontraumatic SCI includes space occupying lesions such as tumours or prolapsed intervertebral discs, spondylosis such as that seen with degenerative spinal changes resulting in compression of the spinal cord, vascular ischemia as in arteriovenous malformations or spinal infarction, inflammation (e.g., idiopathic transverse myelitis, tropical spastic paraparesis, sarcoid) and those associated with congenital or familial etiologies ( Adams & Salam-Adams 1991; McKinley et al. 1999b; McKinley et al. 2001). Although estimates of the incidence of nontraumatic SCI have been provided (e.g., 8 per 100,000) (Kurtzke 1975), it is difficult to ensure accuracy given the heterogeneous nature of nontraumatic SCI and the variety of facilities and programs where these patients may receive care.

Studies comparing those with damage to the spinal cord due to nontraumatic vs. traumatic etiologies have demonstrated a variety of systematic differences between these 2 patient groups. In general, those with nontraumatic SCI are more likely to be older, female, have paraplegia and have an incomplete injury than those with traumatic SCI (McKinley et al. 1996; McKinley et al. 2001; McKinley et al. 2002; New 2005). In the present section, we review the studies characterizing rehabilitation outcomes between those with SCI due to nontraumatic vs traumatic causes.

Table 7 Individual Studies – Differences in Traumatic vs. Non-Traumatic SCI Rehabilitation Outcomes

Discussion

Studies examining nontraumatic SCI typically make use of retrospective case series designs describing rehabilitation outcomes directly (Citterio et al. 2004; McKinley et al. 1996; van der Putten et al. 2001; New et al. 2005; New 2006) or involve case control designs employing matching techniques to make comparisons with traumatic SCI while controlling for such things as age and level and completeness of injury (McKinley et al. 1999; McKinley et al. 2001; McKinley et al. 2002, 2008). As noted above, those with nontraumatic SCI were more likely to be older, female, have paraplegia and have an incomplete injury than those with traumatic SCI (McKinley et al. 1996; McKinley et al. 2001; McKinley et al. 2002; New 2005).  No difference in age, marriage, education, socioeconomic factors, LoS and functional outcome was reported for a case control analysis originating from India (Gupta et al 2008, N=76)

Patients with nontraumatic SCI were primarily discharged home after rehabilitation (Citterio et al. 2004; McKinley et al. 1996). Citterio et al. (2004) found that discharge to home was predicted by many factors including: marital status, completeness of injury, clinical improvement, efficient bowel and bladder management, and absence of pressure ulcers. Another important predictor was shown to be a longer length of stay. This was due to the finding that there is an increased probability of functional and neurological improvement after longer hospital stay.

Ones et al. (2007) and Yokoyama et al. (2006) showed no significant difference in LOS between individuals with traumatic vs. nontraumatic spinal cord injury.  Conversely, when direct comparisons of traumatic and nontraumatic SCI of various etiologies have been conducted using matching procedures, it is clear that shorter rehabilitation LOS was seen for those with nontraumatic SCI (McKinley et al. 2001; Osterthum et al 2009). In addition, this shorter LOS was associated with reduced hospital charges for both an overall and a per diem basis (McKinley et al. 2001). These findings were replicated with similar studies examining subsets of those with nontraumatic SCI including those with stenosis (McKinley et al. 2002) and those with neoplastic cord compression (McKinley et al. 1999) although this was not the case for a review involving infection-based SCI (McKinley et al. 2008). Most of these findings have been established with data from the US Model Systems, although at least two reports from other jurisdictions have reported longer rehabilitation LOS (van der Putten et al. 2001; New 2005).

None of the studies employing matching procedures noted differences in discharge destinations for those with nontraumatic SCI as compared to those with traumatic SCI (McKinley et al. 1999; McKinley et al. 2001; McKinley et al. 2002). although New et al. (2005) did note that within nontraumatic subjects, those individuals male, younger, more mobile, more independent with bowel and bladder function and having less severe AIS grades were more likely to be discharged home. In addition, the relatively poor prognosis and low survival rate of those with neoplastic cord compression has specific implications for discharge disposition (McKinley et al. 1996) although no specific differences were noted in a matched comparison (McKinley et al. 1999).

Comparing the rehabilitation of individuals with traumatic SCI with or without concomitant TBI, Bradbury et al (2008) reported no significant differences in LOS and FIM change score.  However the presence of dual diagnoses was deemed to result in clinical but not statistically significantly greater costs associated with the FIM change score.

All studies reviewed employed the FIM to assess the functional status of individuals and generally demonstrated improved function with rehabilitation. Typically, motor FIM scores were employed or in the event total FIM scores were used it was acknowledged that changes were due primarily to the motor FIM subscale given a ceiling effect associated with the cognitive FIM subscale (McKinley et al. 1999; New 2005). There was conflicting evidence in admission and discharge FIM scores between traumatic and nontraumatic SCI groups. A study by Ones et al. (2007) found patients with traumatic SCI had significantly lower admission FIM scores than those with nontraumatic SCI.  However, other studies found no such trend (McKinely et al. 1999; McKinely et al. 2001).  FIM discharge scores were shown to be lower in the nontraumatic SCI population than traumatic (McKinely et al. 1999; McKinely et al. 2001) while Ones et al (2007) showed no such difference.  When examining only those with stenosis vs those with traumatic SCI, those with nontraumatic SCI had higher FIM scores on admission, similar scores on discharge, resulting in reduced change scores and lower efficiency (McKinley et al. 2002).  On the other hand, those with neoplastic cord compression demonstrated similar FIM scores on admission, reduced scores on discharge, resulting in reduced change scores but no difference in efficiency (McKinley et al. 1999).

McKinely et al. (1999) and McKinely et al. (2001) found no significant difference between traumatic vs. nontraumatic SCI populations in FIM efficiency.  However, Ones et al. (2007) showed a significantly higher FIM efficiency for persons with a traumatic as compared to a nontraumatic etiology. Given this and other conflicting findings in these studies it seems that it is especially important to appreciate the heterogeneity inherent in rehabilitation outcomes of persons with nontraumatic etiologies. In particular, much variation might be expected, especially between centre-based reports with relatively small sample sizes and which include various nontraumatic etiologies within a single nontraumatic grouping. Future research should focus on large scale, case control methodologies employing subject matching strategies that control for potential confounding variables or that examine the effect of potential mediating variables. It is also important to consider logical subgroups based on specific etiologies of nontraumatic SCI.

Van der Putten (2001) assessed a variety of factors using multiple linear regression techniques in order to predict those most associated with increases in FIM motor scores during rehabilitation. They included 100 consecutively admitted patients with nontraumatic SCI with rehabilitation periods of > 1 week. The primary factors associated with improved motor FIM scores accounting for 54% of the variance were having a lower score on admission and reduced time between symptom onset to admission. Age, specific diagnostic subgroup (i.e., space-occupying, vascular, spondylosis, inflammation or hereditary), or lesion level did not improve the prediction significantly.

Conclusions

  • There is level 4 evidence that those with nontraumatic SCI are more likely to be older, female, have paraplegia and have an incomplete injury as compared to those with traumatic SCI.
  • There is level 3 evidence that those with nontraumatic SCI have generally reduced rehabilitation LOS, reduced hospital charges but similar discharge destinations as compared to those with traumatic SCI.
  • There is conflicting level 3 evidence that individuals with nontraumatic SCI have lower FIM efficiencies than those with traumatic SCI, although many studies are comparing persons with different etiologies of nontraumatic SCI.
  • There is level 3 evidence that individuals with traumatic SCI with or without concomitant TBI have similar LoS and achieve similar FIM motor scores, but associated costs were higher in those with dual diagnosis.
  • Individuals with nontraumatic SCI have reduced LOS and less functional improvement with rehabilitation as compared to those with traumatic SCI, although additional studies that better control for nontraumatic subtypes are required.

Effect of Gender and Race on Rehabilitation Outcomes

Potentially, there are many additional factors that may affect rehabilitation outcomes following inpatient SCI rehabilitation. Two of these factors include gender and race, although neither has been examined comprehensively. With respect to gender effects, studies investigating rehabilitation outcomes associated with women have focused on long-term psychosocial outcomes associated with issues such as marriage or motherhood or issues associated with community and vocational reintegration (Westgren & Levi 1994; DeVivo et al. 1995; Shackelford et al. 1998; Krause et al. 1998). Studies of the effects of race on rehabilitation outcomes have been limited to evaluations of the differences between whites and African Americans using US Model Systems data (Meade et al. 2004a; Putzke et al. 2002), although as with studies of gender, investigations of the effects of race have focused more on vocational issues and satisfaction with life (James et al. 1993; Krause et al. 1998; Krause 1998; Meade et al. 2004b).

Table 8 Individual Studies – The Effect of Gender on Rehabilitation Outcomes

Table 9 Individual Studies – The Effect of Race on Rehabilitation Outcomes

Discussion

Gender

Greenwald et al. (2001) employed a mixed, block design, matching male and female subjects so as to control for covariant effects of injury characteristics (level and AIS) and age at injury. They retrospectively analyzed 1,074 subjects over a 10-year period from 1988-1998 by using US Model Systems data culled from 20 different SCI centers over a variety of geographic regions. In general, there were no significant differences between males and females for rehabilitation outcomes including discharge disposition, LOS, FIM motor scores (including change scores and efficiencies) or ASIA motor scores. There were also no reported gender-related differences for the incidence of most medical complications encountered during rehabilitation stay including pneumonia, autonomic dysreflexia, pulmonary embolism, cardiac arrest, kidney calculi or gastrointestinal hemorrhage. However, men did have significantly higher rates for pressure sores although the authors reported that these differences were not robust and did not result in increased stays, charges or lower functional outcomes.

Studies have found mixed evidence for gender-related differences in the incidence of DVT in the spinal cord injured population. Greenwald et al. (2001) demonstrated a significantly higher rate of DVT in men while Furlan et al. (2005) found a higher trend of DVT in women.

The prevalence of psychiatric complications was found to be higher in women than men in the spinal cord injured population (Furlan et al. 2005). After SCI, women in the chronic stage had more symptoms of depression than men in the chronic stage (Furlan et al. 2003) but Krause et al. (2006) did not report a gender difference with regard to number of days adversely impacted by poor mental health in women.

Sipski et al. (2004) demonstrated that as a whole no gender related differences were seen in ASIA score improvement 1 year after injury. However, in contrast to the Greenwald et al. (2001) and Furlan et al. (2005) studies, Sipski et al. (2004) found  women’s ASIA motor scores were significantly higher than men’s 1 year after injury. Also in contrast to Greenwald et al. (2001), Sipski et al. (2004) found men showed significantly more FIM motor improvement than women by discharge.

Overall, it appears there is only minimal evidence that suggests gender differences for most rehabilitation outcomes. Of note, the study with the strongest design (i.e., case control with matching to limit potential confounding) found few gender-related differences (Greenwald et al. (2001). Of note, Krause et al. (2006) found a significant difference between men and women in only one (i.e., nonroutine physician visits) of six measures addressing healthcare utilization and general health status. Upon analysis of the effect of the potential mediating variables of education and income it was found that these had substantially more impact on the likelihood of women having more nonroutine physician visit than did the role of gender differences.

Race

Similar case control designs employing matched groups of Caucasians vs. African Americans from the US Model Systems database have also been employed to examine race effects on rehabilitation outcomes. Putzke et al. (2002) matched race groups according to age, education, gender, occupational status, impairment level, etiology, primary sponsor of care and geographic region whereas Meade et al. (2004) matched according to level of injury, AIS, age and primary sponsor of care. By controlling for all these variables, these authors were able to establish that race acts more as a proxy variable than a predictor of outcomes (Putzke et al. 2002). For example, differences did exist in a wide variety of demographic, rehabilitation outcomes and medical complications for African Americans vs. Caucasians but these were generally accounted for by socio-demographic and etiological differences associated with these groups (Putzke et al. 2002; Meade et al. 2004). For example, African Americans were significantly more likely to be injured as the result of violence and have 11th grade education or less while Caucasians were more likely injured as a result of motor vehicle crashes and had high school education or more (Putzke et al. 2002; Meade et al. 2004). It is likely that these etiological and socio-demographic variations have far more to do with differences seen in rehabilitation outcomes than race.

Similarly, Krause et al (2006) observed that, post-discharge, African Americans in a Southeastern US SCI population reported a greater number of poor health days, more hospitalizations, and a greater number of days hospitalized. However, by conducting an analysis of the effect of the potential mediating variables of education and income it was found that these had substantially more impact on these findings than did the effect of race. 

Conclusions

  • There is level 3 evidence from a single study that there is no difference with respect to gender on discharge destination, rehabilitation LOS and neurological or functional outcomes associated with rehabilitation, although there is conflicting level 4 evidence from individual studies that indicate gender differences for some of these outcomes.
  • There is level 3 evidence that there is no difference with respect to race (Caucasians vs African-American) on rehabilitation LOS and neurological or functional outcomes associated with rehabilitation that are not otherwise explained by socio-demographic or etiological differences.
  • Neither gender nor race effects have been demonstrated definitively for discharge destination, rehabilitation LOS and neurological or functional status in US Model Systems data.

Specialized vs General SCI Units (Acute Care)

Donovan et al. (1984) contend that best practice for SCI care consists of a situation in which every individual sustaining a SCI is admitted to an integrated, comprehensive system where expertise, facilities and equipment are focused on optimal patient care and cost effectiveness. At the other extreme is the situation condemned by Bedbrook and Sedgley (1980), of piecemeal care for those with SCI characterized by “the occasional patient being treated by the occasional doctor”. In practice, care provided by most SCI centers likely falls somewhere in between these extremes of specialized vs. general care. The present section outlines the studies that are focused on examining the hypothesis that care provided through specialized SCI centers is more efficient and effective than that delivered at general centers.

The reader should note that while the majority of these studies were conducted from rehabilitation centers, the experimental manipulation of interest concerns the degree to which specialist care is delivered during the acute care period.

Table 10 Individual Studies – Specialized vs General SCI Units

Discussion

The majority of the studies examining the effect of specialist vs. general SCI care settings focused on this issue during the acute period of care only, with the primary outcome measures being taken at admission to rehabilitation and no follow-up after this point.  Of the five studies reviewed, two investigated the results associated with a specialized, integrated unit comprised of both acute and rehabilitation services (Donovan et al. 1984; Smith 2002). Donovan et al. (1984) noted rates of six of seven different medical secondary complications typically encountered by individuals with SCI were lowest for the cohort admitted initially (i.e., typically within 48 hours post-injury) to the specialist SCI centre.  This cohort was analyzed retrospectively with complication rates determined at various times throughout rehabilitation (i.e., 1-15, 16-30, 31-45, 46-60 days) and compared with those being admitted to specialist SCI centers from more general care settings at similar time periods. Most striking was the absence of decubitis ulcers during any time period for those under more specialized care vs. a progressively greater incidence for those with greater time spent in general care. No statistical analysis was conducted for this study. Smith (2002) conducted a postal survey (i.e., observational study) of 800 persons who had received care through either a specialist spinal injury unit (n=701) or in a general setting (n=99) within the UK. This cross-sectional sample reported significantly improved outcomes for 10 of 18 health outcomes, 16 of 18 functional outcomes and 5 of 10 social outcomes for those who had received care from the specialist vs non-specialist setting. Notable findings included reduced pressure sores (p=0.048), and a lower level of required assistance for the group who had received specialist care, and there was a trend but no statistically significant difference noted between the groups for life satisfaction (p=0.07).

In the remaining 3 studies all comparisons were limited to specialized vs. general acute care and were retrospective in nature. Two of these studies compared subjects as they were being admitted for comprehensive rehabilitation (Yarkony et al. 1985; Heinemann et al. 1989). In both studies, patients were transferred significantly faster to comprehensive inpatient rehabilitation from more specialized acute care settings than from general hospital settings. In the remaining study by Tator et al. (1995), the same issue was investigated by examining outcomes associated with a seven year experience of a newly developed specialist SCI unit as compared to historical data culled from pre-existing trauma units reflecting more general settings (Tator et al. 1995). In this study, subjects were also transferred to rehabilitation faster from the specialist SCI unit resulting in a reduced length of stay (LOS) in acute care.

In general, all of these studies demonstrated improved medical outcomes associated with more specialized care. In addition to the reduced complication rates noted above by Donovan et al. (1984) and Smith (2002), others have noted that more specialized acute care resulted in less spine instability (Heinemann et al. 1989) and significantly improved joint motion with reduced incidence of contractures (Yarkony et al. 1985) upon admission to a comprehensive rehabilitation program. In addition, reduced mortality and improved neurological recovery (as demonstrated by higher scores on the Cord Injury Neurological Recovery Index) were seen in the newly developed specialist SCI unit as compared to the data from pre-existing general trauma units (Tator et al. 1995). It should be noted that a gradual reduction of mortality was seen over the entire study period and that reductions attributed to the specialist unit might also be due to many general gradual improvements in medical care, especially as a historical control was used as the primary basis for comparison.

Only one study has examined the functional benefits realized during rehabilitation associated with SCI-specific acute care vs. that delivered in more general settings. Heinemann et al. (1989) used the Modified Barthel Index to show that those individuals receiving more specialist care made functional gains during subsequent rehabilitation with significantly greater efficiency (i.e., functional change/LOS) than those referred from general settings. No statistically significant differences were seen between the specialist vs. general groups for either admission or discharge functional levels nor were significant differences seen with LOS. There was, however, a significant reduction in the time from injury to rehabilitation admission for those receiving care in the specialist SCI unit. This implies an overall reduced length of total hospitalization for this group, although this data was not reported. Functional benefits associated with early admission and reduced LOS will be reviewed in the next section.

A primary limitation of all studies reported here was the use of retrospective data collection methods and in the case of Tator et al. (1995), the use of historical controls. Another important limitation of some of these studies is the failure to control for (or at least adequately describe) the time to admission to initial care following injury, especially with respect to control subjects (e.g., Donovan et al. 1984; Yarkony et al. 1985; Heinemann et al. 1989). This is an important confounding variable as early admission to a specialized system of care is likely associated with better outcomes as demonstrated in the following section. Therefore, the present conclusions are limited to a Grade 3 level of evidence and some findings have been reduced to Grade 4 if not corroborated and involving inadequate controls. While more carefully controlled prospective studies would be difficult to implement, they would be required to strengthen the evidence in this area.

Conclusions- Benefits of Specialized vs General SCI Units

  • Based on several retrospective, case-control studies there is level 3 evidence that individuals cared for in interdisciplinary, specialist SCI acute care units soon after injury (most being admitted within 48 hours) begin their rehabilitation program earlier.
  • There is level 3 evidence that individuals cared for in interdisciplinary, specialist acute care SCI units have fewer complications upon entering and during their rehabilitation programs.
  • There is level 4 evidence that individuals initially cared for in interdisciplinary, specialist acute care SCI units make more efficient functional gains during rehabilitation (i.e., more or faster improvement).
  • There is level 4 evidence that individuals cared for in interdisciplinary, specialist SCI units have reduced mortality.
  • More specialized, interdisciplinary acute SCI care is associated with faster transfers to rehabilitation and may result in fewer medical secondary complications, more efficient functional gains and reductions in overall mortality.

Early vs Delayed Admission to Specialized SCI Units

As noted by others and in the previous section, earlier as opposed to delayed admission to interdisciplinary, specialized SCI units has been associated with a variety of beneficial outcomes (DeVivo et al., 1990). The question of whether earlier admission to an organized system leads to enhanced outcomes is inexorably linked to the question of specialist vs general care for individuals with SCI. In all studies in this and the preceding section the authors framed their studies as addressing either the question of delay or the question of interdisciplinary, specialist care yet similar designs were employed for each (i.e., retrospective case control). For those subjects experiencing a delay to admission to a specialized SCI unit, it was either presumed or established that preceding acute care was conducted at a general hospital unit. The author simply chose to characterize this as either a delay or more general care. For the present review we have maintained this distinction as originally intended by each author, especially, as in some cases, there is little or no verification of the general nature of the pre-admission care or the time of first admission, respectively. However, the reader is advised that the specific findings and conclusions reached in both sections are most likely associated with a delay to an interdisciplinary, specialized acute or rehabilitation SCI unit with prior care delivered at a general hospital facility. 

In addition, much variation exists in the literature that addresses the question of delayed admission. There is no uniform or accepted definition of what constitutes a delay and this varies depending on the context of the study, most notably whether it is conducted from an acute vs rehabilitation perspective. For the present review, all studies which examine this question by comparing 2 or more groups within the first week post-injury have been examined separately from those with an initial time period greater than 1 week post-injury. These have been termed 1) Acute and 2) Post-acute studies, respectively.

Table 11 Individual Studies – Early vs Delayed Admission (Acute Studies)

Table 12 Individual Studies – Early vs Delayed Admission (Post-Acute Studies)

Discussion

The present section describes a series of studies in which investigators examined the effect of delayed admission to a specialist SCI unit. However, there is not a common definition of what constitutes a “delayed” admission. Therefore, to assist the reader in summarizing these delays, the details of the various time frames under examination are outlined along with their respective results in Table 13.

Table 13 Studies Examining Delayed Admission to SCI Unit (Comparison Studies Only)

Two acute studies were reviewed which each employed retrospective, 2 group (case control) designs with a definition of 24 hours as to what constituted an “early” vs a “delayed” admission (DeVivo et al. 1990; Dalyan et al. 1998). Each study examined a fairly large cohort admitted to a multidisciplinary, specialized SCI unit (i.e., US model system center) within 24 hours post-injury vs those admitted after 24 hours. Neither study reported the actual injury to admission times for the “delayed” admission group and both failed to provide information about the referral sources (e.g., specialist vs. general nature). DeVivo et al. (1990) noted that total hospital LOS (i.e., acute and rehabilitation) was reduced for all patient groups except for those with complete tetraplegia when admission was not delayed. Mean hospital charges were also reduced for early admission subjects except those with complete paraplegia and there were some reductions in the incidence of specific medical complications with early admission for some patient groups, most notably a trend for a reduction in pressure sores for all but those with incomplete paraplegia. In addition these authors also reported a trend for increased neurologic recovery and reduced mortality with earlier admission, although they also noted methodological concerns associated with the actual measures employed. Dalyan et al. (1998), in a study focusing on the development of contractures, noted a reduced incidence of contractures for those admitted within 24 hours to a specialized unit.

Of the studies examining time periods longer than one week (i.e., post-acute), five studies have been reviewed (Oakes et al. 1990; Aung & el Masry 1997; Sumida et al. 2001; Amin et al. 2005; Scivoletto et al. 2005). The initial admission delays examined ranged from 1 week (Aung & el Masry 1997) to 1 month (Scivoletto et al. 2005). All studies employed retrospective case control designs and all examined LOS for the entire period of initial hospitalization as a primary outcome measure. In all cases, those admitted earlier had reduced LOS, regardless of the considerable variation between studies in the definition of what constituted a delay in admission. It should be noted that this difference to LOS was statistically significant for all studies but one; for which it was reported as a trend (p=0.15). This study examined the longest delay of 1 month (Scivoletto et al. 2005). 

Functional benefits were also demonstrated for individuals admitted earlier. Scivoletto et al. (2005) reported that those admitted earlier than 1 month had significantly greater gains and greater efficiency associated with the Barthel Index (BI) as well as greater mobility gains and efficiency as measured by the Rivermead Mobility Index (RMI) but there was no difference with respect to walking as measured by the Walking Index for SCI (WISCI). Similarly, Sumida et al. (2001) reported increased Functional Independence Measure (FIM) gains and efficiencies for those admitted earlier than 2 weeks post-injury as compared to those admitted later. Interestingly, these investigators also showed that for a majority of the various patient groups tested (i.e., paraplegia and tetraplegia, early and late), significant associations were seen between a measure of function (i.e., FIM) and a measure of impairment (i.e., ASIA motor scores). However, Scivoletto et al. (2005) found no effect of early vs. late admission on AIS motor scores. A follow-up study conducted by Scivoletto et al. (2006) reported significant improvements in all measures employed in their prior study (i.e., BI, RMI, WISCI, ASIA motor scores) as assessed between admission to discharge even in those subjects that were admitted at ≥90 days post-injury – although there was no control condition reported to confirm that these improvements were different than might have been seen with earlier admission. Taken together, these studies suggest better outcomes are seen with earlier admission, although improvements are still possible even if rehabilitation onset is delayed for several months.

Other investigators examined the role of early vs late admission on the incidence of secondary medical complications. Oakes et al. (1990) reported that earlier admissions were associated with a reduced incidence of secondary medical complications in those with tetraplegia and Aung and el Masry (1997) noted a reduction in the number of pressure sores for all subjects with earlier admission.

Despite the apparent benefits of earlier admission to a multidisciplinary, specialized integrated SCI unit, there are significant issues which serve to constrain the strength of evidence in this area. First and foremost is the retrospective nature of all studies conducted to date. It is difficult to ascertain how comparable the “early” vs “later” groups truly are with respect to potential confounding variables. In particular, there is a paucity of information on the pre-admission level of care and medical status, especially for the delayed admission groups. In addition, it is difficult to discern the potential role that medical status or the presence of secondary medical complications may have played in admission delays. The retrospective nature of the studies outlined in this and the previous section makes it difficult to determine if individuals prone to complications and with poorer medical status would have naturally comprised a greater proportion of the delayed admission groups. Therefore, as noted earlier, more carefully controlled prospective studies would be required to strengthen the evidence in this area.

Conclusions - Benefits of Early vs Later Admission

  • Based on several retrospective, case-control studies there is level 3 evidence that individuals admitted earlier to interdisciplinary, integrated specialist SCI units have a shorter total hospitalization length of stay than those admitted later.
  • There is level 3 evidence that individuals admitted earlier to interdisciplinary, integrated specialist SCI units make greater functional gains in a shorter period of time (i.e., greater efficiency) than those admitted later.
  • There is level 3 evidence that individuals admitted earlier to interdisciplinary, integrated specialist SCI units have fewer secondary medical complications (especially pressure sores) than those admitted later.
  • There is level 4 evidence for positive utility of admission to rehabilitation even at delays ≥90 days post injury.
  • Because of the variability between studies as to what constitutes “early” admission to interdisciplinary, specialist integrated SCI units;, it is not possible to determine a specific period for optimal admission. At least one study has demonstrated benefits with an early admission described as £30 days post-injury. The majority of studies defined early admissions as 1-2 weeks post-injury, while studies focused on acute care describe early admission as within 24 hours post-injury.
  • Earlier admission to specialized, interdisciplinary SCI care is associated with reduced length of total hospital stay and greater and faster rehabilitation gains with fewer medical secondary complications.
  • Prospective studies with stronger designs are needed to strengthen the evidence and provide more direction as to the optimal model of care.

Health Care After SCI Inpatient Rehabilitation


Outpatient and Follow-up Care

Various authors have noted the importance of providing continued, regular, specialized follow-up care following discharge from rehabilitation (Ernst et al. 1998; Cox et al. 2001; Dryden et al., 2004). In a recent review, Bloemen-Vrencken et al. (2005) described various follow-up programmes for persons with SCI. These authors noted that the vast majority of the papers in this area offered little more than a description of the program with 5 of these being identified as either experimental or quasi-experimental in nature. Of these, 2 studies examined the effect of various models of care associated with routine after-care (Dinsdale et al. 1981; Dunn et al. 2000), while the remaining 3 studies focused on evaluations of telehealth applications (specifically telemedicine) or nursing education for the prevention of pressure sores or UTIs (Barber et al. 1999; Phillips et al. 1999; Phillips et al., 2001). The present section describes the literature examining different approaches to the provision of follow-up care, recognizing that several of these involve the investigation of the role of telehealth applications.

Cox et al. (2001) performed a needs assessment of 54 community-dwelling individuals with SCI using structured telephone interviews and reported a perceived high need for a specialist, multidisciplinary SCI outreach service. Some of the issues identified as the greatest areas of need included dealing with physical changes, transportation, work issues, ongoing education and pain management. The primary barriers to needs being met were overwhelmingly related to limitations of local expert knowledge but also included inadequate funding, complicated processes or service fragmentation and not knowing where to go for help. Preferred service delivery options in order of preference included telephone advice, home visits, SCI outpatient clinics, community-based service and regional hospital clinics (Cox et al. 2001). Similar suggestions have been provided by clinicians, especially as they observe the consequences of inadequate care received by some individuals upon discharge from inpatient rehabilitation programmes (Vaidyanathan et al. 2004).  Despite these reports, little direct evidence has been established for the effectiveness of different methods of providing follow-up care.

Table 14 Outpatient and Follow-up Care

Discussion

Dunn et al. (2000) performed an exploratory study of the value of receiving regular, comprehensive outpatient health care follow-up as compared to those who were deemed to have no access to these services. Although this investigation was limited by a poor description of the specific services offered to both the experimental and control groups, there were significant differences in the perceived health, independence, and absence of depression in those seen regularly in outpatient clinics. In addition, this group had significantly less frequent occurrences of specific secondary conditions and also rated the severity of these conditions as less than those having no access to these clinics (Dunn et al. 2000). Although this trial was prospective in nature and attempted a quasi-experimental controlled methodology, the potential confounds (i.e., gender, completeness, race, age, veteran status) varied greatly between the experimental and control groups. In addition, it was uncertain if selection bias may also have been an issue, as the authors did not specify what percentage of individuals within their own service provision cohort refused or did not receive regular outpatient care. These limitations resulted in this study being assessed as having a Level 4 level of evidence.

Similarly, Bloemen-Vrencken et al. (2007) conducted a large scale investigation comparing the utility of a transmural nurse to liase between community-based patients and health care professionals as compared to routine outpatient care as characterized by periodic visits to a rehabilitation doctor or centre, but results were limited by methodological problems. No differences were seen between a matched sample (n=31 in each group) in terms of the prevalence of secondary complications (i.e., notably pressure sores or UTIs) or associated healthcare utilization over the first year post-discharge. The authors noted several limitations with this study, in addition to recruitment issues that resulted in a sample that was half the intended size. Most notably, the implementation of the transmural nurse program was deemed inadequate with nurses making less home visits than was intended. In addition, centres participating in the control condition enhanced their outpatient program mid-study and it was also felt that the follow-up period of one year was too short given the observation that many patients are more consistent in attending follow-up visits during the early post-discharge period but then gradually may lose contact with the rehabilitation centre.

Due to financial constraints in the developing country of Columbia, Lugo et al (2007; N=42) reported on prospectively planned FIM and ASIA outcomes resulting from an interdisciplinary outpatient program of rehabilitation for individuals with SCI.  An average 13.5 day in-patient rehabilitation program was augmented with 18 months of follow-up (at 1, 3, 6, 12 & 18 month time points).  Although there was a lack of accessibility to continuous therapy, some functional goals were achieved over the 18 month treatment period.  In the absence of protocolized SCI care in developing countries, regular interdisciplinary follow-up and low-cost outpatient service delivery can be effective in achieving functional rehabilitation goals provided that provisions are made for program accessibility (i.e. transportation).

Telehealth applications seem especially amenable to the provision of follow-up care given the typical care model of specialized health care services centralized in large urban centres that must continue to meet the needs of patients as they return to their disparate communities and as they link with primary care practitioners, who often lack specialized knowledge about optimal SCI management. Dallolio et al. (2008) conducted a multi-centre RCT (n=127) across 3 centres in Italy, Belgium and the UK that employed a series of telemedicine videoconferences that served to assess the risk of secondary complication development in informing prevention and treatment recommendations and also to address issues that would enhance function. Overall, patients that received the telemedicine sessions did not show significant increases in FIM or SCIM II gains, nor reductions in secondary complication development as compared to those who underwent routine follow-up visits. However, site by site analysis demonstrated that patients participating in the telemedicine intervention at the largest site (Italy, n = 59 of 127) did show significantly increased functional benefits. In addition, when considering participants across all 3 sites, patients were generally more satisfied with their care when receiving telemedicine visits as an adjunct to their regular care.

Earlier studies have also suggested that telehealth has promise in delivering education directed towards preventing secondary complications – most notably pertaining to pressure sore management. Vesmarovich (1999) and colleagues published 2 separate reports noting the potential of a telehealth application (i.e., Picasso Still-Image Videophone) in managing and preventing further pressure sores (Phillips et al. 1999; Vesmarovich et al. 1999). In an exploratory pilot study using a pre-post study design (n=8), Vesmarovich et al. (1999) reported that this approach facilitated education, allowing it to be provided at the point of need, thereby reinforcing previous inpatient rehabilitation education. Phillips et al. (1999) compared the same videophone technology to telephone-only consultation or standard care in a prospective controlled trial (n=37) investigating participants newly discharged from inpatient rehabilitation to home. Standard care consisted of access to a helpline which offered free information and counselling over the study period. The videophone group received weekly counselling sessions focusing on self-checking for pressure ulcers and other related education via videophone for 6-8 weeks followed by weekly telephone counselling for 4-6 weeks. Similar activities were conducted with the telephone group for 10 weeks following discharge. No significant differences were reported across the 3 groups with respect to doctor/hospital/ER visits, calls to helpline, pressure sore occurrences/characteristics or employment status. The videophone group reported the highest number of ulcers over a variable follow-up period of 7 ± 2 months but this was attributed to more stage I and II ulcers being identified using this approach. In addition, participants in the videophone group had the highest rate of return to work. The authors did note that this study was severely limited by inadequate sample size, inability to control for confounding variables and non-randomized design and therefore the level of evidence assigned to this article has been downgraded to Level 4. Power calculations assuming 80% power revealed that a sample size of 120 would have been required to detect an effect of the intervention in increasing post-injury employment by 5%.

Conclusions

  • There is limited level 4 evidence that provision of routine, comprehensive, specialist follow-up services may result in perceived improvements of health, independence and less feelings of depression.
  • There is limited level 4 evidence that coordination of care through a community-based transmural nurse has no effect on reducing secondary complications and associated health utilization as compared to routine outpatient care consisting of periodic visits to a specialized rehabilitation doctor or centre.
  • There is level 4 evidence that regular and accessible interdisciplinary follow-up can result in achieving functional goals where protocolized SCI care is unavailable.
  • There is limited  Level 1 evidence  from a single study that telemedicine videoconferencing as an adjunct to routine follow-up care improves patient satisfaction and may lead to enhanced functional outcomes.
  • Routine, comprehensive, specialist follow-up services may result in improved health.
  • In the absence of protocolized SCI care, regular and accessible interdisciplinary follow-up and outpatient care can result in functional goal attainment.
  • Telehealth applications such as telemedicine may enhance patient satisfaction with follow-up services and also may improve functional outcomes.

Rehospitalization and Healthcare Utilization after Initial Rehabilitation in SCI

Persons with SCI are at greater risk for numerous secondary health complications than the general population and therefore are at far greater likelihood of being admitted to hospital or seeking medical care for one reason or another. At least some of the causes for these admissions or other forms of healthcare utilization have been deemed as preventable (e.g., pressure sores, UTIs) and therefore there has been much interest in understanding the patterns and antecedents for rehospitalization/healthcare utilization so as to inform effective preventative strategies.

Table 15 Individual Studies – Rehospitalization and Healthcare Utilization

Discussion

Rehospitalization

Of the nine papers reviewed across six distinct jurisdictions (i.e. Australia, Canada, Italy, Turkey, UK, USA), differences in methods of calculating readmission rates and specific inclusion criteria made comparisons tenuous at best. Regardless, it is apparent that hospital re-admission is a very significant issue across all regions with universally high re-admission rates (Savic et al. 2000; Cardenas et al. 2004; Charlifue et al. 2004; Dryden et al. 2004; Franceschini et al. 2003; Jaglal et al. 2009; Middleton et al. 2004; Paker et al. 2006; Dorsett and Geraghty 2008). Cardenas et al. noted an average rehospitalization rate of 55% (defined as the number of patients rehospitalized within a particular anniversary of injury year) for the first year post injury and then rates of 36-38% for subsequent anniversary years from 5-20 years post injury. This analysis was conducted on the large multi-centre US model systems dataset (n=8668) between 1995-2002. This was very similar to the rates reported by Charlifue et al. (2004) which was not surprising as she had examined the same database, albeit, over different years (1973-1998).

The only other high-quality, population-based data on which to base a comparison exists for the jurisdiction of Ontario, Canada. Jaglal et al. (2009) defined rehospitalizations over the first year after initial rehabilitation discharge, thereby circumventing the primary limitation of most other studies associated with a variable follow-up period. Multiple administrative healthcare databases were linked to overcome the other common limitation inherent in several other studies, that being the variances which may occur with participant self-report. These authors reported a rehospitalization rate of 27.5% - approximately half that reported in the US. This appears to be similar to the rates reported over a somewhat similar time period in Queensland, Australia (n=46) by Dorsett and Geraghty (2008) as participants reported rehospitalization rates of ~18% from 0-6 months post-discharge (estimated from graph), ~25% from 6-12 months, ~31% for year 2, ~18% for year 3 and ~38% for year 10. Overall cumulative rehospitalization rates were reported at 32.6% over the first 2 years and 52% by the 10th year. Middleton et al. (2004) reported slightly higher 10 year (i.e., cumulative) rehospitalization rates for the jurisdiction of New South Wales, Australia (n=432) with 58.6% of persons with SCI being rehospitalized due to a SCI-related issue and an additional 10.8% being admitted to hospital for a non-SCI-related issue. Another report indicated an overall re-admission rate of 64% over 6 years involving 3 longitudinal interviews of community dwelling persons (n=198) with a mean of 33 years injury duration associated with two large SCI specialist centres in the UK (Savic et al. 2000).

One trend that can be gleaned from these reports is that the rehospitalization rates generally decline following the initial year or two post-discharge (Cardenas et al. 2004; Charlifue et al. 2004; Middleton et al. 2004). Regardless, in the context of informing initial rehabilitation practice, rehospitalization rates in the first year post-discharge are of particular importance and the data associated with the largest and highest-quality studies demonstrate a higher rate in the US versus other jurisdictions (i.e., Australia, Canada). It is difficult to speculate on why this may be the case given the variation between these countries in terms of health care and social systems although one suggestion has been that the high rehospitalization rate may be linked to a shortened rehabilitation stay, especially present in the US (Cardenas et al. 2004). It is certainly the case that the US has the shortest rehabilitation LOS than any other jurisdiction reporting data (See Section 4.2).

There is reasonable agreement for the primary reasons for hospital readmission following initial SCI inpatient rehabilitation across most studies (Cardenas et al. 2004; Dorsett and Geraghty 2008; Dryden et al. 2004; Franceschini et al. 2003; Jaglal et al. 2009; Middleton et al. 2004; Paker et al. 2006; Savic et al. 2000). All reports included issues associated with skin (e.g., pressure ulcers) and the genitourinary system (e.g., UTIs and to a lesser extent complications of the upper urinary tract) as among the highest reasons for readmission. Other issues that were associated with significant rates of readmission included diseases of the respiratory system (e.g., infections, especially in persons with tetraplegia), musculoskeletal complaints (e.g., spasticity, pain) and digestive system problems (e.g., bowel). Of note, musculoskeletal issues were found to be most prominent as a cause of readmission in the report by Jaglal et al. (2009) than any other issue. It should be noted that although readmission rates were significant due to pressure ulcers, when considering the subsequent length of stay often associated with this specific complication, the impact of pressure ulcers are even more consequential (Savic et al. 2000; Middleton et al. 2004).

Cardenas et al. (2004) conducted multivariate logistic regression on the large US Model Systems dataset and determined that motor FIM™ scores at discharge and the payer were the two most significant predictors of rehospitalization within the first year (i.e., those with lower motor score state or federal funded persons vs those with private insurance were more likely to be hospitalized). Payer, motor FIM™ and race were also noted as predictors of readmission at later points in time. A similar analysis was conducted by Jaglal et al. (2009) and the factors most significantly associated with rehospitalization in the first year were longer length of rehabilitation stay, rural residence, ≥50 outpatient physician visits and ≥50 specialist visits following the initial admission. Odds ratios for individual factors associated with the highest likelihood of being rehospitalized included: Total physician visits ≥ 50 (OR=3.69), Total specialist visits ≥ 50 (OR=2.95), rural residence (OR=1.94), presence of comorbidities with Charlson score ≥ 3 (OR=2.08), >70 years old (OR=1.72). Charlifue et al. (2004) noted that both the number and length of rehospitalizations were predicted by being older at injury, being unmarried, having an indwelling catheter, having a more severe SCI and having been hospitalized 5 years earlier.

Healthcare Utilization

Similar to that evident with hospital readmissions, it is apparent that persons with SCI utilize other aspects of the healthcare system more frequently than most other persons, especially in the first year following rehabilitation discharge. Three Canadian studies from two separate jurisdictions (i.e., provinces of Alberta and Ontario) determined the rates of physician contacts for persons returning to the community following initial rehabilitation. Guilcher et al. (2010) and Munce et al. (2009) examined the linked results from several province-wide (Ontario) administrative healthcare databases to investigate differences in the number of physician contacts in the first year following rehabilitation associated with etiology (i.e., nontrauma / trauma) or gender respectively. There were no significant differences due to etiology with similar numbers of overall physician visits for those with nontraumatic vs traumatic SCI (31.2 vs 29.7 respectively), however there were differences in the types of physicians seen between the 2 groups (Guilcher et al. 2010). Women with SCI had significantly more physician visits than men in the first year following discharge (37.0 vs 30.0) although they were more likely to visit their family physician, whereas men had significantly more visits to their physiatrist (Munce et al. 2009). Some of the individual factors associated with a greater likelihood of having more physician visits included age, lower function (i..e., lower FIM scores), direct discharge to a chronic care / other rehabilitation facility, urban vs rural residence or the presence of comorbidities / prior (in-hospital) complications (Munce et al. 2009; Guilcher et al. 2010). Dryden et al. (2004) used similar methodologies in another Canadian province (i.e., Alberta) and found a median number of physician contacts of 22.0 in the first year and this declined dramatically to 8.0 visits by year 2 and to 4.0 visits by year 6. In all cases, control subjects identified in the overall health registry and matched by age, gender and geographic region had significantly fewer physician contacts for each year (median = 3.0 visits).

Conclusions

  • There is level 4 evidence that at least 25% of persons with SCI (moreso in some jurisdictions including the US) may expect a hospital readmission in the first year following discharge from SCI rehabilitation.
  • There is level 4 evidence from three studies that hospital re-admission rates are highest in the first year post injury and then stabilize at a still significantly high rate.
  • There is level 4 evidence from eight studies that urinary problems (UTIs), pressure ulcers, respiratory infections and musculoskeletal problems are consistently among the most frequent causes of hospital readmission among persons with SCI.
  • There is level 4 evidence from three studies that factors such as increased age, lower function / greater severity of injury, prior contact with the health system, funding, rural habitation and being unmarried are associated with a greater chance of a hospital readmisssion.
  • There is level 3 evidence from 1 study and supported by two level 4 studies that persons with SCI have an increased number of physician contacts as compared to matched controls from the general population, especially moreso in the first year post-injury.
  • Hospital readmission occurs frequently for persons with SCI (especially within the first year post-injury), with UTIs, pressure ulcers, respiratory infections and musculoskeletal problems among the most frequent causes.
  • Persons with SCI have more physician contacts than the general population, especially more so in the first year post-injury.

Key Points

Description of SCI Rehabilitation Outcomes

Rehabilitation Length of Stay

  • Those with higher level and more severe injuries have longer rehabilitation LOS.
  • Rehabilitation LOS in the US and Israel has become progressively shorter over the last few decades.

Neurological and Functional Status

  • Most individuals make significant functional gains during inpatient rehabilitation.
  • A significant proportion of people improve 1 AIS (ASIA Impairment Scale) grade in the first few months post-injury particularly those initially assessed AIS B and C.

Factors for Optimal Outcomes

Effect of Intensity on Rehabilitation Outcomes

  • Increased therapeutic intensity may not necessarily lead to functional benefits, but data is scarce.

Effect of Age on Rehabilitation Outcomes

  • Younger individuals with paraplegia are more likely to have shorter rehabilitation LOS than older individuals.
  • Younger individuals are more likely to make greater functional gains during rehabilitation than older individuals.
  • Younger individuals with tetraplegia (or in a mixed traumatic, nontraumatic sample) are more likely to make gains in neurological status during rehabilitation than older individuals.

Differences in Traumatic vs Non-Traumatic SCI Rehabilitation Outcomes

  • Individuals with nontraumatic SCI have reduced LOS and less functional improvement with rehabilitation as compared to those with traumatic SCI, although additional studies that better control for nontraumatic subtypes are required.

Effect of Gender and Race on Rehabilitation Outcomes

  • Neither gender nor race effects have been demonstrated for discharge destination, rehabilitation LOS and neurological or functional status in US Model Systems data.

Specialized vs General SCI Units (Acute Care)

  • More specialized, interdisciplinary acute SCI care is associated with faster transfers to rehabilitation and may result in fewer medical secondary complications, more efficient functional gains and reductions in overall mortality.

Early vs Delayed Admission to Specialized SCI Units

  • Earlier admission to specialized, interdisciplinary SCI care is associated with reduced length of total hospital stay and greater and faster rehabilitation gains with fewer medical secondary complications.
  • Prospective studies with stronger designs are needed to strengthen the evidence and provide more direction as to the optimal model of care.

Health Care After SCI Inpatient Rehabilitation

Outpatient and Follow-up Care

  • Routine, comprehensive, specialist follow-up services may result in improved health
  • In the absence of protocolized SCI care, regular and accessible interdisciplinary follow-up and outpatient care can result in functional goal attainment.
  • Telehealth applications such as telemedicine may enhance patient satisfaction with follow-up services and also may improve functional outcomes.

Rehospitalization and Healthcare Utilization after Initial Rehabilitation in SCI

  • Hospital readmission occurs frequently for persons with SCI (especially within the first year post-injury), with UTIs, pressure ulcers, respiratory infections and musculoskeletal problems among the most frequent causes.
  • Persons with SCI have more physician contacts than the general population, especially more so in the first year post-injury

Summary

  • There is level 3 evidence (with predominately US data) that rehabilitation LOS has become progressively shorter up to the mid-1990s. Only investigators from Israel have published data that supports this contention.
  • There is level 3 evidence that those with higher level and more severe injuries have longer rehabilitation LOS.
  • There is level 4 evidence that a significant proportion of people (~50%) initially assessed as AIS B and C will improve by at least 1 AIS grade in the first few months post-injury concomitant with inpatient rehabilitation. Fewer individuals (~10%) initially assessed as AIS A and D will improve by 1 AIS grade.
  • There is level 4 evidence that individuals make significant functional gains during inpatient rehabilitation, more so for those with complete and incomplete paraplegia and incomplete tetraplegia.
  • There is level 4 evidence based on a single case series that increased therapeutic intensity may not be associated with any functional benefit as measured by the FIM.
  • There is level 3 evidence that significantly shorter rehabilitation LOS is associated with younger vs older individuals with paraplegia. The same may not be true for those with tetraplegia or for mixed cohorts involving traumatic and nontraumatic SCI.
  • There is level 3 evidence that age is inversely related to patient’s independence level.
  • There is level 3 evidence that younger as compared to older individuals are more likely to obtain greater functional benefits during rehabilitation.
  • There is level 3 evidence that significant increases in neurological status during rehabilitation are more likely with younger than older individuals with tetraplegia or for mixed cohorts involving traumatic and nontraumatic SCI. The same may not be true for those with paraplegia.
  • There is level 4 evidence that those with nontraumatic SCI are more likely to be older, female, have paraplegia and have an incomplete injury as compared to those with traumatic SCI.
  • There is level 3 evidence that those with nontraumatic SCI have generally reduced rehabilitation LOS, reduced hospital charges but similar discharge destinations as compared to those with traumatic SCI.
  • There is conflicting level 3 evidence that individuals with nontraumatic SCI have lower FIM efficiencies than those with traumatic SCI, although many studies are comparing persons with different etiologies of nontraumatic SCI.
  • There is level 3 evidence that individuals with traumatic SCI with or without concomitant TBI have similar LoS and achieve similar FIM motor scores, but associated costs were higher in those with dual diagnosis.
  • There is level 3 evidence from a single study that there is no difference with respect to gender on discharge destination, rehabilitation LOS and neurological or functional outcomes associated with rehabilitation, although there is conflicting level 4 evidence from individual studies that indicate gender differences for some of these outcomes.
  • There is level 3 evidence that there is no difference with respect to race (Caucasians vs African-American) on rehabilitation LOS and neurological or functional outcomes associated with rehabilitation that are not otherwise explained by socio-demographic or etiological differences.
  • Based on several retrospective, case-control studies there is level 3 evidence that individuals cared for in interdisciplinary, specialist SCI acute care units soon after injury (most being admitted within 48 hours) begin their rehabilitation program earlier.
  • There is level 3 evidence that individuals cared for in interdisciplinary, specialist acute care SCI units have fewer complications upon entering and during their rehabilitation programs.
  • There is level 4 evidence that individuals initially cared for in interdisciplinary, specialist acute care SCI units make more efficient functional gains during rehabilitation (i.e., more or faster improvement).
  • There is level 4 evidence that individuals cared for in interdisciplinary, specialist SCI units have reduced mortality.
  • Based on several retrospective, case-control studies there is level 3 evidence that individuals admitted earlier to interdisciplinary, integrated specialist SCI units have a shorter total hospitalization length of stay than those admitted later.
  • There is level 3 evidence that individuals admitted earlier to interdisciplinary, integrated specialist SCI units make greater functional gains in a shorter period of time (i.e., greater efficiency) than those admitted later.
  • There is level 3 evidence that individuals admitted earlier to interdisciplinary, integrated specialist SCI units have fewer secondary medical complications (especially pressure sores) than those admitted later.
  • There is level 4 evidence for positive utility of admission to rehabilitation even at delays ≥90 days post injury.
  • Because of the variability between studies as to what constitutes “early” admission to interdisciplinary, specialist integrated SCI units; it is not possible to determine a specific period for optimal admission. At least one study has demonstrated benefits with an early admission described as £30 days post-injury. The majority of studies defined early admissions as 1-2 weeks post-injury, while studies focused on acute care describe early admission as within 24 hours post-injury.
  • There is level 4 evidence that provision of routine, comprehensive, specialist follow-up services may result in perceived improvements of health, independence and less feelings of depression.
  • There is limited level 4 evidence that coordination of care through a community-based transmural nurse has no effect on reducing secondary complications and associated health utilization as compared to routine outpatient care consisting of periodic visits to a specialized rehabilitation doctor or centre.
  • There is level 4 evidence that regular and accessible interdisciplinary follow-up can result in achieving functional goals where protocolized SCI care is unavailable.
  • There is limited  Level 1 evidence  from a single study that telemedicine videoconferencing as an adjunct to routine follow-up care improves patient satisfaction and may lead to enhanced functional outcomes.
  • There is level 4 evidence that at least 25% of persons with SCI (moreso in some jurisdictions including the US) may expect a hospital readmission in the first year following discharge from SCI rehabilitation.
  • There is level 4 evidence from three studies that hospital re-admission rates are highest in the first year post injury and then stabilize at a still significantly high rate.
  • There is level 4 evidence from eight studies that urinary problems (UTIs), pressure ulcers, respiratory infections and musculoskeletal problems are consistently among the most frequent causes of hospital readmission among persons with SCI.
  • There is level 4 evidence from three studies that factors such as increased age, lower function / greater severity of injury, prior contact with the health system, funding, rural habitation and being unmarried are associated with a greater chance of a hospital readmisssion.
  • There is level 3 evidence from 1 study and supported by two level 4 studies that persons with SCI have an increased number of physician contacts as compared to matched controls from the general population, especially moreso in the first year post-injury.

Appendix: Studies Describing Rehabilitation Outcomes

Table 16 Individual Studies Describing SCI Rehabilitation Outcomes

References

  • Adams RD, Salam-Adams M. Chronic nontraumatic diseases of the spinal cord. Neurol Clin 1991;9(3):605-623.
  • Amin A, Bernard J, Nadarajah R, Davies N, Gow F, Tucker S. Spinal injuries admitted to a specialist centre over a 5-year period: a study to evaluate delayed admission. Spinal Cord 2005;43(7):434-437.
  • Anzai K, Young J, McCallum J, Miller B, Jongbloed L. Factors influencing discharge location following high lesion spinal cord injury rehabilitation in British Columbia, Canada. Spinal Cord 2006;44(1):11-18.
  • ASIA. American Spinal Injury Association: International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury. Chicago, IL: American Spinal Injury Association, 2002.
  • Aung TS, El Masry WS. Audit of a British Centre for spinal injury. Spinal Cord 1997;35(3):147-150.
  • Barber DB, Woodard FL, Rogers SJ, Able AC. The efficacy of nursing education as an intervention in the treatment of recurrent urinary tract infections in individuals with spinal cord injury. SCI Nurs 1999;16(2):54-56.
  • Bedbrook G. Discerning matters of future importance in paraplegia. Paraplegia 1979;17(1):36-45.
  • Bedbrook GM, Sedgley GI. The management of spinal injuries--past and present. Int Rehabil Med 1980;2(2):45-61.
  • Blackwell TL, Steins SA, Winkler T, Krause JS. Spinal Cord Injury Desk Reference: Guidelines for Life Care Planning and Case Management.  New York, New York: Demos Medical Publishing Inc. 2001.
  • Bloemen-Vrencken JH, de Witte LP, Post MW. Follow-up care for persons with spinal cord injury living in the community: a systematic review of interventions and their evaluation. Spinal Cord 2005;43(8):462-475.
  • Bloemen-Vrencken JH, de Witte LP, Post MW, Pons C, van Asbeck FW, van der Woude LH et al. Comparison of two Dutch follow-up care models for spinal cord-injured patients and their impact on health problems, re-admissions and quality of care. Clinical Rehabilitation 2007;21(11):997-1006.
  • Bors E. The Spinal Cord Injury Center of the Veterans Administration Hospital, Long Beach, California, U.S.A. Facts and thoughts. Paraplegia 1967;5(3):126-130.
  • Bradbury CL< Wodchis WP, Mikulis DJ, Pano EG, Hitzig SL, McGillivray CF, Ahmad FN, Craven BC, Green RE. Traumatic brain injury in patients with traumatic spinal cord injury: clinical and economic consequences. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008;89:S12-84.
  • Bracken MB, HOLFORD TR. Effects of timing of methylprednisolone or naloxone administration on recovery of segmental and long-tract neurological function in NASCIS 2. J Neurosurg 1993;79(4):500-507.
  • Bracken MB, Shepard MJ, HOLFORD TR, Leo-Summers L, Aldrich EF, Fazl M et al. Administration of methylprednisolone for 24 or 48 hours or tirilazad mesylate for 48 hours in the treatment of acute spinal cord injury. Results of the Third National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Randomized Controlled Trial. National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study. JAMA 1997;277(20):1597-1604.
  • Burke DC, Burley HT, Ungar GH. Data on spinal injuries--Part II. Outcome of the treatment of 352 consecutive admissions. Aust N Z J Surg 1985;55(4):377-382.
  • Cardenas DD, Hoffman JM, Kirshblum S, McKinley W. Etiology and incidence of rehospitalization after traumatic spinal cord injury: a multicenter analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85(11):1757-1763.
  • Catz A, Thaleisnik M, Fishel B, Ronen J, Spasser R, Folman Y, Shabtai EL, Gepstein R. Recovery of neurologic function after spinal cord injury in Israel. Spine 2002;27:1733-1735.
  • Celani MG, Spizzichino L, Ricci S, Zampolini M, Franceschini M. Spinal cord injury in Italy: A multicenter retrospective study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82(5):589-596.
  • Chan SC, Chan AP. Rehabilitation outcomes following traumatic spinal cord injury in a tertiary spinal cord injury centre: a comparison with an international standard. Spinal Cord 2005;43(8):489-498.
  • Charlifue S, Lammertse DP, Adkins RH. Aging with spinal cord injury: Changes in selected health indices and life satisfaction. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 85:1848-1853.
  • Chung L, Pan AW, Wang YH. A causal model of rehabilitation resource use for subjects with spinal cord injury in Taiwan. J Rehabil Med 2003;35(5):208-212.
  • Cifu DX, Seel RT, Kreutzer JS, McKinley WO. A multicenter investigation of age-related differences in lengths of stay, hospitalization charges, and outcomes for a matched tetraplegia sample. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80(7):733-740.
  • Cifu DX, Huang ME, Kolakowsky-Hayner SA, Seel RT. Age, outcome, and rehabilitation costs after paraplegia caused by traumatic injury of the thoracic spinal cord, conus medullaris, and cauda equina. J Neurotrauma 1999;16(9):805-815.
  • Citterio A, Franceschini M, Spizzichino L, Reggio A, Rossi B, Stampacchia G. Nontraumatic spinal cord injury: an Italian survey. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85(9):1483-1487.
  • Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine. Outcomes following traumatic spinal cord injury: clinical practice guidelines for health-care professionals. J Spinal Cord Med 2000;23(4):289-316.
  • Cox RJ, Amsters DI, Pershouse KJ. The need for a multidisciplinary outreach service for people with spinal cord injury living in the community. Clin Rehabil 2001;15(6):600-606.
  • Dallolio L, Menarini M, China S, Ventura M, Stainthorpe A, Soopramanien A et al. Functional and clinical outcomes of telemedicine in patients with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008;89(12):2332-2341.
  • Dalyan M, Sherman A, Cardenas DD. Factors associated with contractures in acute spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 1998;36(6):405-408.
  • De Vivo MJ, Richards JS, Stover SL, Go BK. Spinal cord injury. Rehabilitation adds life to years. West J Med 1991;154(5):602-606.
  • DeVivo MJ, Kartus PL, Stover SL, Fine PR. Benefits of early admission to an organised spinal cord injury care system. Paraplegia 1990;28(9):545-555.
  • DeVivo MJ, Kartus PL, Rutt RD, Stover SL, Fine PR. The influence of age at time of spinal cord injury on rehabilitation outcome. Arch Neurol 1990;47(6):687-691.
  • DeVivo MJ, Hawkins LN, Richards JS, Go BK. Outcomes of post-spinal cord injury marriages. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995;76(2):130-138.
  • DeVivo MJ. Sir Ludwig Guttmann Lecture: trends in spinal cord injury rehabilitation outcomes from model systems in the United States: 1973-2006. Spinal Cord 2007;45(11):713-721.
  • Dinsdale S, Thurber D, Hough E, Rencz S. Community based monitoring for spinal man. Can J Public Health 1981;72(3):195-198.
  • Donovan WH, Carter RE, Bedbrook GM, Young JS, Griffiths ER. Incidence of medical complications in spinal cord injury: patients in specialised, compared with non-specialised centres. Paraplegia 1984;22(5):282-290.
  • Dorsett P, Geraghty T. Health related outcomes of people with spinal cord injury—a 10 year longitudinal study. Spinal Cord 1008;46:386-391.
  • Downs SH, Black N. The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health 1998;52(6):377-384.
  • Dryden DM, Saunders LD, Rowe BH, May LA, Yiannakoulias N, Svenson LW et al. Utilization of health services following spinal cord injury: a 6-year follow-up study. Spinal Cord 2004;42(9):513-525.
  • Dunn M, Love L, Ravesloot C. Subjective health in spinal cord injury after outpatient healthcare follow-up. Spinal Cord 2000;38(2):84-91.
  • Eastwood EA, Hagglund KJ, Ragnarsson KT, Gordon WA, Marino RJ. Medical rehabilitation length of stay and outcomes for persons with traumatic spinal cord injury--1990-1997. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80(11):1457-1463.
  • Ernst JL, Thomas LM, Hahnstadt WA, Piskule AMA. The Self-Identified Long-Term Care Needs of Persons with SCI. SCI PSYCHOSOCIAL PROCESS 1998;10:127-132.
  • Franceschini M, Di Clemente B, Rampello A, Nora M, Spizzichino L. Longitudinal outcome 6 years after spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2003;41;280-285.
  • Furlan JC, Krassioukov AV, Fehlings MG. The effects of gender on clinical and neurological outcomes after acute cervical spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma 2005;22(3):368-381.
  • Gassaway J, Whiteneck G, Dijkers M. Clinical taxonomy development and application in spinal cord injury research: the SCIRehab Project. J Spinal Cord Med 2009;32(3):260-269.
  • Geisler FH, Dorsey FC, Coleman WP. Recovery of motor function after spinal-cord injury--a randomized, placebo-controlled trial with GM-1 ganglioside. N Engl J Med 1991;324(26):1829-1838.
  • Geisler WO, Jousse AT, Wynne-Jones M, Breithaupt D. Survival in traumatic spinal cord injury. Paraplegia 1983;21(6):364-373.
  • Greenwald BD, Seel RT, Cifu DX, Shah AN. Gender-related differences in acute rehabilitation lengths of stay, charges, and functional outcomes